C-Arm Aids Tumor Localization in Laparoscopy
C-Arm Aids Tumor Localization in Laparoscopy
Abstract
When laparoscopic surgery is selected for gastrointestinal resection, accurate tumor localization is important. We used a C‑arm intraoperatively
in a case where preoperative endoscopic clipping was done at the tumor site. Our patient was an 82‑year‑old man with moderately differentiated
adenocarcinoma in the sigmoid colon. ResolutionTM Clips were applied adjacent to the lesion on the proximal and distal ends. Intraoperatively,
the growth over the sigmoid colon was traced using the assistance of the C‑arm according to the endoclips placed during colonoscopy. Bipolar
current was used to mark the edges of resection based on the C‑arm findings. The operative time was 110 minutes. On postoperative day 5,
the patient was discharged from the hospital after an uneventful postoperative stay. The combination of preoperative endoscopic clipping and
intraoperative C‑arm assistance can achieve accurate localization of tumors for laparoscopic surgery, potentially reducing operative time,
leading to resection with oncologically safe margins of the colon.
lesion was taken and Radiopaque Resolution™ Clips [Figures 3 mark the edges of resection based on the C‑arm findings.
and 4] were applied adjacent to the lesion at the proximal and Medial‑to‑lateral dissection was done around the marked
distal ends. The biopsy result showed moderately differentiated sigmoid colon along with the mesocolon. The right ureter and
adenocarcinoma in the colon. A CT scan of the abdomen was gonadal vessels were identified and safeguarded. Abdominal
performed, which showed a polypoidal lesion in the sigmoid incision was made at the left iliac fossa. A wound bag was
colon measuring 25 × 15 mm [Figures 5 and 6], with subtle placed to cover the incision and the dissected sigmoid colon
overlying prominence of the vasa recta. There was no evidence was removed from the incision and cut. Vascularity of the cut
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/wjcs by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AW
of fat stranding or adenopathy and no significant focal lesions ends was confirmed. The descending colon was anastomosed
were observed in the liver. After thorough routine preoperative with the rectum with end‑to‑end anastomosis using 3‑0
workup, the patient was planned for laparoscopic sigmoid Mersilk sutures in two layers. Hemostasis was confirmed. The
colectomy. abdominal drain was kept through the left paracolic gutter in
nYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 04/20/2024
The patient was positioned in the modified Lloyd Davies the pelvis, which was removed on postoperative day 5. The
position. Parts were prepared, painted, and draped. The operative time was 110 minutes. On postoperative day 5, the
following ports were placed: one 10‑mm port in the umbilical patient was discharged from the hospital after an uneventful
area, 10‑mm port in the right lumbar region and two 5‑mm postoperative stay.
ports in the left lumbar region, and one 5‑mm port in the upper
right lumbar region. Discussion
The growth over the sigmoid colon was traced using Since the COLOUR Study Group demonstrated that the
C‑arm assistance according to the endoclips placed during results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer were
colonoscopy [Figures 7-8]. Bipolar current was used to similar to those of traditional surgery in terms of survival
Figure 1: Endoscopic view of the lesion (green arrow) Figure 2: Failure of saline lift (yellow arrow)
Figure 3: Proximal end of the lesion Figure 4: Distal end of the lesion
a b
Figure 8: (a) C‑arm images showing the proximal clip (blue arrow) and
the distal clip (yellow arrow), (b) C‑arm images showing the proximal
clip (blue arrow) and the distal clip (yellow arrow)
The inability to view the clip from the serosal side of the 8. Singh S, Arif A, Fox C, Basnyat P. Complication after pre‑ operative
intestines is the primary disadvantage of endoscopic clipping.[27] India ink tattooing in a colonic lesion. Dig Surg 2006;23:303.
9. Del Rio P, Dell’Abate P. Complication of an endoscopic tattoo.
We hypothesized that this endoscopic clipping constraint may Endoscopy 2003;35:638.
be addressed by a reasonably simple, noninvasive method that 10. Matsuda T, Parra‑Blanco A, Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T.
uses the help of a C‑arm for tumor location. Assessment of likelihood of submucosal invasion in non‑polypoid
colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endos Clin N Am 2010;20:487‑96.
11. COLOR Study Group. COLOR: A randomized clinical trial
Conclusion
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/wjcs by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AW
comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Dig Surg
2000;17:617‑22.
The combination of preoperative endoscopic clipping
12. Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—Are
and intraoperative C‑arm assistance can help achieve we being honest with our patients?. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:723‑7.
accurate localization of tumors for laparoscopic surgery, 13. Feingold DL, Addona T, Forde KA. Safety and reliability of tattooing
potentially reducing operative times, leading to resection with colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg
nYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC1y0abggQZXdgGj2MwlZLeI= on 04/20/2024