FORM INTERNSHIP B.
1
LESSON PLAN AND DELIVERY EVALUATION FORM
Name: Naw Nay Tha Blay Paw Subject: Jolly Phonic Date: 8 February 2024
Instructions:
Read through the evaluation criteria and circle the most appropriate score for each criterion.
Provide comments for each section as relevant/appropriate.
CRITERIA MARKING KEY:
4 = Excellent
4 = Very Good
3 = Good
2 = Average
1 = Needs Improvement
Criteria for Grading
1. Lesson Plan 5
The lesson plan was organized correctly, with appropriate goals and 4
objectives.
3
2. Clear Behavioral Expectations 5
The students were given very clear behavioral expectations. 4
Classroom rules were reinforced.
3
3. Anticipatory Set/Introduction to the Lesson 5
The teacher gained the children’s attention. 4
The class was quiet, seated and waiting in anticipation.
The teacher used aids, IT, pictures to stimulate student’s curiosity. 3
The teacher used an element of surprise to create curiosity and interest with
his/her students. 2
1
4. Procedural steps in the lesson were followed. 5
The lesson had a logical flow. 4
Remember, however, that you teach children not the plan. Therefore,
procedural steps can change or be altered when appropriate. 3
Be flexible to capture a teachable moment.
2
5. Content 5
The teacher has a good working knowledge and understanding of the topic 4
and objectives.
Content was delivered accurately and confidently. 3
6. Teaching manner 5
Good eye contact 4
Confident; encouraged students to participate
Positive facial expressions 3
Student-centered methodology
2
7. Voice Projection 5
Clear diction and enunciation 4
Voice pitched at an audible level
Voice projection was appropriate and not above the noise of the class. 3
8. Pace of the Lesson 5
Appropriate time for each step in the lesson (be flexible) 4
The lesson moved along at an appropriate pace.
3
9. Rapport with students 5
Teacher demonstrates professional distance. 4
Teacher was firm, assertive, fair, and friendly.
Teacher showed that good rapport is built on good teaching. 3
Teacher encouraged positive communication.
2
10. Questions 5
A good selection of HLQ (higher level questions) and LLQ (lower level 4
questions) were asked.
Wait time was appropriate. 3
Teacher responded/accepted answers positively.
Additional questions extended the student’s thinking. 2
11. Effectiveness of the Lesson’s Resources/Aids/Materials 5
IT-PPT/overheads/DVD 4
Charts/books/pictures/Objects/artifacts
Drama 3
Games
2
12. Student Involvement 5
Students were actively participating and engaged in learning. 4
Collaborative learning process.
Students remained on task. 3
13. Classroom management Whole class/ paired/ group teaching 5
Students were given clear expectations. 4
Students were well organized and on task.
Behavioral expectations were reinforced. 3
14. Guided Practice 5
4
The teacher circulated amongst the students, answering questions, explaining 3
tasks and assisting when needed.
2
15. The teacher gave praise when students remained focused. 5
Positive praise was given for appropriate: Behavior; thoughtful answers; 4
being on task, etc.
3
16. Closure 5
The teacher returned to the initial objectives to revise and appropriately sum 4
up the lesson at the conclusion.
3
17. OVERALL SCORE
78/80
General Comments:
a. Strengths
- Miss Chi demonstrated exceptional clarity in explaining concepts and maintaining
students’ engagement during lessons.
- Students were responsive and engaged
b. Areas of Improvements
- Ensure everyone pays attention when you explain new information during the activity.
- Learn to be relax and enjoy the lesson with students.
Supervising Teacher Date
