Overview of Fusion-Fission Hybrid Reactor Design Study in China
Overview of Fusion-Fission Hybrid Reactor Design Study in China
net/publication/255141641
CITATIONS READS
8 629
12 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Guoshu Zhang on 24 March 2014.
YICAN WU, LIJIAN QIU, QUNYING HUANG, BINGJIA XIAO, XIAOPING LIU,
YIXUE CHEN, M. H. KONG, and ASIPP DESIGN TEAM Institute of Plasma Physics
Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 1126, Hefei, 230031, China
III. BLANKET
IV. DIVERTOR
Fig. 4. Attaching lock of the blanket in the vacuum vessel. Fig. 5. Divertor structure.
Fig. 7. Temperature distribution in the target plate. Fig. 8. Neutronics calculation model.
model. Since the streaming neutrons are effectively tritium from the blanket to the tritium extraction system
reduced, this divertor configuration is beneficial. The is considered. Using the SWITRIM code, the tritium in-
total heating power in the TFC, calculated to be 4.2 kW, ventory and its distribution were obtained. The time-
mainly results from gamma heating and comes from dependent inventories in various subsystems are shown
region IV ~see Fig. 8!. In the outboard, the peak nuclear in Fig. 9. Under full-power operation of the FEB-E, 0.5 kg
heating in the winding pack, the peak insulator dose, and of initial tritium inventory will meet the requirement of
the peak fast neutron fluence is 0.2 mW0cm 3, 1.4 3 10 6 circulation. Furthermore, the tritium leakage issue is an-
Gy04.5 full-power year ~FPY!, and 1 3 10 18 neutrons0 alyzed. Under normal operations, tritium leakage from
cm 2 4.5 FPY, respectively. The corresponding values in the helium coolant is negligible, and from the plasma
the inboard are nearly four times that in the outboard exhaust system is low. Under accidents, when the blan-
because of the thin inboard space. Thus, the TFC shield- ket temperature goes up to 10008C, tritium leakage in-
ing is adequate. creases because of the enhanced permeation from the
lithium side, but it is still allowable. However, leakage
from the plasma exhaust system is a concern in accidents.
V. TRITIUM ISSUES
The SWITRIM code has been developed to simulate VI. TEST BLANKET MODULE
the whole circulation process of tritium through various
subsystems, including burning, breeding, isotope sepa- A high-power density blanket module is designed
ration, extraction, and storage processes to assess the for the FEB-E as a test module. The concept of LiPb
tritium inventory in these subsystems. The coupled equa- eutectic0transuranium oxide suspension is adopted to
tions for time-dependent tritium inventories in all sub- reach an aiming power density of 50 to 100 W0cm 3. A
systems were established. The discrete transfer of the structure is designed within the FEB-E vacuum vessel.
Fig. 9. Time variation of the tritium inventory in FEB-E sub- The waste disposal rating and remote maintenance
systems: Y0 5 inventory in tritium storage, Y1 5 in rating ~RMR! are calculated for the FEB-E. The activa-
outboard blanket, Y2 5 in inboard blanket, and Y11 5 tion calculation and analyses of all long-lived radio-
total tritium inventory.
active nuclides are performed. The results indicate that
the first wall and blanket structure materials of the FEB-E
can meet the nuclear waste disposal criteria after a few
weeks from shutdown. The RMR of the first wall and
One-dimensional neutronics calculation gives a k eff of blanket at different times after 1 FPY of operation are
0.84, an energy multiplication of 37, and a rather flat calculated. The results indicate that based on the present
power density distribution throughout the blanket. The design, an additional 25-cm lead layer is needed to meet
peak power density is 70 W0cm 3. The cross section of the requirement of hands-on maintenance at the outer
the module is shown in Fig. 10. Multiple cooling panels surface of the TFC shielding.12,13
are introduced to reduce the peak temperature of the blan- Finally, based on the FEB-E design, a 1:10 model
ket. Each cooling channel has two passes through the has been built, showing the details of the reactor struc-
blanket. The panels are held flexibly by the neighbor ture including the cooling tubes, manifolds, and channels.
panels at the position of the turnings to keep the spacing.
This also provides a strong structure to guarantee relia-
bility. The first wall is supported by a second cooling
panel and ribs to strengthen this weakest part of the mod- VIII. SPHERICAL TOKAMAK TRANSMUTATION
ule. Mechanical analyses will help to improve this first- CONCEPT
wall design. Measures to be taken are to shape the first
wall in a curved form and to thicken the second cooling To seek a new and efficient way to realize a volu-
panel. In order to avoid high temperature hence high metric neutron source, the spherical tokamak concept
stress at the ribs, no fissile materials are put into this has been studied in China. Spherical or low aspect ratio
zone. This configuration is suitable for power density
flattening by arranging a different proportion of fissile
fuel along the radial direction. In spite of up to 15 cool-
Fig. 10. Cross section of the high-power test blanket module. Fig. 11. Temperature distribution in test blanket module.
tokamaks 14 with an aspect ratio ~A! in the range of 1.2 to 4. a helium and LiPb eutectic dual cooled fast fis-
2.0 offer the possibilities of compact volumetric fusion sion blanket concept simultaneously for transmu-
neutron sources as well as fusion reactors requiring rel- tation of actinides and long-lived fission products
atively low external fields. The conceptual study on the
5. a multifunction fuel cycle blanket concept.
spherical tokamak has been oriented to the level of the
volumetric neutron source for the purpose of nuclear waste In the studied concepts, fissile 239 Pu and 33 U have
transmutation. The optimized core parameters of the been put into the blankets for neutron multiplication and
spherical tokamak neutron source are listed in Table II. energy balance adjustment. Thus, the requirement for
A design with an aspect ratio near the lower limit fusion driver technology could be much more easily sat-
~due to limited space! requires an unshielded center con- isfied; that is, the plasma core parameters and fusion
ductor post ~CCP! as part of the TFC circuit. The fully technology requirements are far less stringent. The ef-
exposed CCP will receive severe neutron damage, resis- fective transmutation of long-lived-waste nuclides could
tive and nuclear heating power, which is one of the key be achieved based on the requirement for relatively low
components and requires replacement periodically. The neutron wall loadings of 0.2 to 1.0 MW0m 2, which is
analysis results for the CCP considering neutron radia- between the levels of that achieved in the Joint European
tion effects such as radiation damage, transmutation, nu- Torus ~JET! tokamak device and that in the ITER engi-
clear and resistive heat removal, induced radioactivity, neering design.
and blanket tritium breeding ratio in a spherical tokamak
reactor compared with those estimated for the first wall
of conventional tokamak reactors have been studied to REFERENCES
see if the technical requirements are comparable.15 The
analyses have shown that the severity of neutron radia-
1. J. H. HUANG and G. ZH. SHENG, “ Progress in Concep-
tion damage and transmutation in the CCP is comparable tual Design of a Tokamak Engineering Test Breeder,” Proc.
with that estimated for the first wall of conventional to- 3rd Annual Scientific Conf., Moscow, Russia, September 1992,
kamak reactors. Thus, radiation damage, transmutation Nuclear Society International.
effects, and other relevant problems of the CCP need to
be studied further if a design with high neutron wall 2. L. QIU, Y. WU, Q. XU, and Q. HUANG, “Transmutation
loading is adopted. of Sr-90 Using Fusion-Fission Hybrid Reactor,” Proc. 14th
Since 1990, China has performed many studies on Int. Conf. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Re-
transmutation of long-lived nuclides in the blankets of search, Wuerzburg, Germany, September 30–October 7, 1992,
hybrid reactors in addition to studies on breeding nu- IAEA-CN-560G-2-4, Vol. 3, p. 391, International Atomic En-
ergy Agency ~1992!.
clear fuel using hybrid reactors. The studies have cov-
ered various blanket concepts 15–22 : 3. Y. C. WU and L. J. QIU, “Fusion-Fission Hybrid Blanket
1. a thermal fission blanket concept with 239 Pu fis- Conceptual Design,” Proc. 2nd Japan0China Symp. Materials
sile neutron multiplication material for transmu- for Advanced Energy Systems and Fission and Fusion Engi-
tation of fission products neering, Tokyo, Japan, June 4–12, 1994, University of Tokyo
~1994!.
2. hard neutron spectrum blanket concepts for trans-
mutation of actinides 4. K. M. FENG and J. H. HUANG, “Transmutation Calcula-
3. a thermal neutron spectrum blanket concept for tion of 237 Np with a Fusion Reactor,” J. Fusion Eng. Des., 29,
transmutation of actinides 64 ~1995!.
9. L. QIU, “ Perspective on Fusion Research in China with Japanese Symp. Materials for Advanced Energy Systems and
Special Innovation on Hybrid Reactor Program,” Fusion Eng. Fission and Fusion Engineering, Fukuoka, Japan, December
Des., 55, 535 ~2001!. 4–7, 2000, Kyushu University.
10. Y. R. CRUTZEN et al., “Structural Design Aspects of the 17. K. M. FENG, G. S. ZHANG, and Z. J. GUO, “Transmu-
Locking System Needed for Next Tokamak Plasma Facing Com- tation of Minor Actinides in a ST Tokamak Fusion Reactor,”
ponents Against Electromagnetic Transients,” Fusion Eng. Des., Chinese J. Nucl. Fusion Plasma Phys., 20, 1, 13 ~2000!.
16–18, 363 ~1991!.
18. L. J. QIU et al., “A Compact Tokamak Transmutation Re-
11. G. F. MATTHEWS, “ Plasma Detachment from Divertor actor for Treatment of High Level Wastes ~HLW!,” presented
Targets and Limiters,” Nucl. Mater., 220–222, 104 ~1995!. at 15th International Atomic Energy Agency Int. Conf. Plasma
Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Seville, Spain,
12. K. M. FENG and G. HU, “Calculations of Remote Main-
September 26–October 1, 1994.
tenance Rating for a Fusion Experiment Breeder, FEB-E,” Chi-
nese J. Nucl. Fusion Plasma Phys., 19, 1, 27 ~1999!. 19. L. J. QIU et al., “A Compact Tokamak Transmutation Re-
13. K. M. FENG, “Calculations of Waste Disposal Rating for actor,” presented at the International Atomic Energy Agency
a Fusion Experiment Breeder, FEB-E,” Chinese J. Nucl. Fu- 16th Fusion Energy Conf., Montreal, Canada, October 7–11,
sion Plasma Phys., 20, 1, 13 ~2000!. 1996.
14. Y.-K. M. PENG and E. T. CHENG, “Magnetic Fusion 20. L. J. QIU et al., “A Low Aspect Ratio Tokamak Transmu-
Driven Transmutation of Nuclear Waste ~FTW!,” J. Fusion tation Reactor,” Fusion Eng. Des., 41, Part B, 437 ~1998!.
Energy, 12, 381 ~1993!.
21. L. J. QIU et al., “Advanced Study of Tokamak Transmu-
15. Y. C. WU et al., “Waste Transmutation and Energy Pro- tation System,” presented at 18th International Atomic Energy
duction in Spherical Tokamak Hybrid Reactor,” presented at Agency Fusion Energy Conf., Sorrento, Italy, October 4–10,
20th Symp. Fusion Technology ~SOFT!, Marseille, France, 2000.
September 7–11, 1998.
22. Y. WU, B. XIAO, Q. HUANG, and L. QIU, “Neutron
16. K. FENG and G. HU, “Transmutation of Minor Actinides Radiation Effects of the Center Conductor Post in a Spherical
in a ST Tokamak Fusion Reactor,” presented at Sixth Sino- Tokamak Reactor,” Fusion Technol., 35, 1 ~1999!.