Rubrics – Project Review Two
S. Categories Score 3 Score 2 Score 1 Score 0
No
Design Choice (CO3) The most appropriate choice A reasonable choice is A choice is made after The misunderstanding may
1 is made after a thorough made after a good basic analysis. lead to irrelevant choices.
analysis. analysis.
2 Design Methodology The methodology to The methodology to The methodology to The methodology to
implement the design is implement the design is implement the design is implement is mostly wrong.
(CO3) sound. reasonable. mostly correct but has
minor errors.
Develop and Conduct The implementation and The implementation The implementation The implementation
Experiment the experiments are and the experiments are and the experiments are and the experiments are
3 scientifically sound. scientifically sensible. having some minor wrong.
(CO5) errors.
4 Design of system The methodology for The methodology for The methodology for The methodology for
evaluation (CO5) system evaluation is system evaluation is system evaluation is system evaluation is not
appropriate. reasonable. mostly correct but has identified.
minor errors.
5 Team Project Execution The students meet their guide The students meet their The students meet their The students did not meet
and Effort (CO4) on a regular basis and follow guide on a regular guide only sporadically the guide after the previous
timelines as planned. basis, but do not meet review
the timelines as
planned.
6 Describe the issues have a very good have a relatively good Can partly understand there is no understanding of
pertaining to society, understanding of the issues understanding of the these issues but cannot these issues
health, safety, legal, and can relate to the issues and can partly relate to their project
environment, project relate to the project
Culture applicable to
the project (CO6)
7 Written Report and All technical aspects of the All technical aspects of Technical aspects of The report and presentation
presentation project are covered and the project are covered. the project are partially slides have lot of errors.
interaction documented as per the Most of the questions covered. The questions The questions are not at all
format. All the questions asked by the evaluation are not answered answered or answered
(CO5) from the evaluation panel panel are answered satisfactorily wrongly.
are answered confidently. confidently.
8 Plagiarism in the Report There is no plagiarism and There is no plagiarism Most of the report content is
substantial improvement but limited improvement There is reasonable plagiarized
(CO5,CO7) from the previous report. from the previous report. plagiarism. No
improvement from the
previous report.
