0% found this document useful (0 votes)
255 views8 pages

Black and Red Ware Culture, Ganga Valley

Black and red ware culture

Uploaded by

Kalpita Mondal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
255 views8 pages

Black and Red Ware Culture, Ganga Valley

Black and red ware culture

Uploaded by

Kalpita Mondal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
Chapter- 4 Cultural Background of Chalcolithic Culture of Middle Ganga Plain Cultures of the Middle Ganga Plain:- Today the middle Ganga plain is the most densély populated area of India. By the oncoming of the Ist millennium B. C. the plain is dotted with a large number of Neolithic-Chalcolithic settlements. The surrounding hilly tracts were already inhabited by the stone settlers in the Vindhya-Kaimur belt and the plateau of Chota Nagpur. In due course of time with transition from hunting-gathering to agricultural base of economy there appear to be a shift in ecological preference. Some sites found in Uttar Pradesh-Bihar confirm this contention. The district of Chandauli and Meja subdivisions of Allahabad district in Uttar Pradesh have yielded Stone Age sites from Lower Palaeolithic to Neolithic phase. There are a good number of Mesolithic sites, which were witness to the some of seasonal migration of the people from the Vindhyan range, appear in Pratapgarh district. Numerous graves of Mesolithic people are located on horse-shoe lakes. The Palaeolithic 159 settlements in these areas really belong to the spurs of the Vindhyan Mountains. This is also true of the middle Palaeol:thic settlement found in Paisara village in Mongyr and Neolithic-Chalcolithic settlements in Senuwar in Rohtas district. Fortunately both the sites were excavated by Banaras Hindu University. Though these sporadic Paleolithic settlements had started in various parts of Middle Ganga valley, the real breakthrough in the history of cultural life of the area comes with the introduction of metal technology. In middle Ganga plain continuous habitation begins with culture using Black-and-Red ware, initially in Neolithic Palaeoenvironment. Supposedly it is comparatively later horizon of Neolithic Culture. The Chalcolithic culture in middle Ganga plain begins around 2000 B. C. that continues till the advent of Iron around 1000 B. C. Here we propose to make an in-depth study of the middle Ganga plain right from the earliest levels of its continuous history starting with Black- and-Red ware with Chalcolithic culture. The Black-and-Red ware (B. R. W.) continues with some changes till early historic period. Most sites of the middle Ganga plain have a continuous occupation up to Sunga-Kushana period and Gupta-post Gupta periods e.g. Ayodhya, Sringverpura, Kausambi, Rajghat, Khairadih, Chirand, Patliputra, Sonpur, Vaisali, Raigarh, Manjhi, Narhan, Oriup etc. 160 Chalcolithic Culture with Black-and-Red Ware:- Occurring in diverse contexts, Black-and-Red ware is a unique pottery tradition. Black-and-Red ware was first discovered in 1945 and then at Brahmgiri in 1947 by R. E. M. Wheeler." In the beginning the Black-and- Red ware occurred invariably with Megaliths and it acquired the designation of Megalithic ware and later on with Satvahna culture. After independence, the archaeological forthcoming from different parts of country changed the supposed exclusive burial character of the Black-and-Red ware. It came to be associated with the archaeological cultures from Neolithic period to the end of first millennium B. C? Before going into the details of the cultural dimensions and other related issue of Black-and-Red ware, a few words about the technique of manufacturing of the ceramic may be in order here. Technique:- The Black-and-Red ware enjoys the nomenclature because of its appearance. It is a ware which is black inside and red out side with black top. The results are obtained with a special technique known as “inverted firing technique”. In this technique, the pots are placed in an inverted position in the kiln, subjecting the exterior to oxi¢izing conditions and the 161 interior to reducing conditions. Saw-dust or some vegetable material might have been fitted in the pots while firing under reducing conditions. As result, the interior turns black and the exterior dull red to buff in colour. It is a well known that Black-and-Red ware is a product of inverted firing. However, some effort has been made to create some special effect of dullness in view of Majumdar.* The Black-and-Red Ware Culture in Middle Ganga Plain:- The B. R. W. in Middle Ganga Plain appears from Neolithic to N. B. P. W. period. For the convenience, we may divide its occurrence in Pre N. B. P.W. period in three cultural contexts, viz. (A). Neolithic (B). Chalcolithic (C). In association with iron in pre N. B. P. W. period. (A). In Neolithic context, this pottery appears at sites like Chirand, Chechar Kutubpur, Taradih, Senuwar and Sohgaura etc. These Neolithic settlements demonstrate a rich cultural material. The people were generally living in the wattle and daub houses. Some of the houses at Chirand were circular in plain. The floors were made of rammed earth. Ovens of different shapes. have been found at Chirand.* 162 The ceramic industry was dominated by red ware along with grey and B. R. W. Both plain and painted B. R. W. was found. This pottery was painted in white colour with linear pattern. Generally vase, bowl, deep bowl, dish, pan, footed cup were the prominent shapes. severa! types of stone and bone types of stone and bone tools were in use. Microliths were used in considerable number. Beads of various semiprecious stone are found at Chirand in numerous shapes.* Ornaments of terracetta, bone and ivory were also used, as is attested to at Chirand® and Taradih. Several type of terracotta objects like ornaments and figurine are found at Chirand.* ‘The significant finds of Chirand neolithism handmade figurines of terracotta. Bull, serpent, bird and female figurines have been found hand modeled here. The culture subsisted on agriculture, cattle breeding and hunting and gathering. Grain like wheat, barely, mung, massor and rice ete. were cultivated in this time of span. Cattle, sheep, goat, pig and dog were also domesticated. Occurrence of charred bones and cut-marks on bones of several wild animals suggest hunting and fishing substantiated the economy heavily. (B). In the Chalcolithic context the ceramic industry appears at sites like Sonpur, Narhan, Imlidih, Manjhi, Khairadih, Vaisali, Maner, Lahuradewa, Malhar, Oriup etc. During this period the B. 8. W. industry became 163 predominant and pottery was sophisticated. The people of this period were with slightly advanced material culture. The houses were made of wattle and daub. The floors were made of beaten earth and rarely of lime. Mud walls were also in use as evident at several sites. The houses were seemingly partitioned into a number of rooms by rising walls; one of them served the purpose of Kitchen. A number of armed clay has been found at Lahuradewa’. They are made in different direction and location on mud floors. These hearths are comparable with the modern ones, employed for cooking the food. Three different kinds of ovens, circular, semi-circular dug out have been found at Oriup.'” Agriculture, fishing and hunting seem to have been the main stay of their economy. Though metal agriculture implements have not been attested to from any site but a good list of cereals have been attested from sites like Narhan, Lahuradeva, Agiabir, Malhar, Chirand, Senuwar, Sonpur, Taradih and Oriup etc. Discovery of animals and fish bone from several sites indicates that cattl: breeding, hunting and fishing were other important source of livelihood of these people. Several types of hunting tools were also used. Microliths were still in use. Beads of terracotta, stone and semiprecious stones have been discovered almost from all the Chalcolithic sites (Sites of Middle Ganga Plain). Copper bangles are also found from Oriup.'' Copper wires were found at Chirand, Sonpur etc. 164 Terracotta bead, animal and human figurines, mctal objects, fragmentary bone pieces were also in use, though rarely. Several types of bones objects were being used. Ceramic industry was characterized mainly by B. R. W. Besides B. R.W., the potters also produced black, black slipped, red, cream slipped red and steel grey wares. Long necked jar, vase, bowl, dish and basin are the principal types noticed in the B. R. W. (©. In the Pre N. B. P. W. iron age, B. R. W. has been reported from the sites like Rajghat, Prahladpur, Ganwaria and Narhar: etc. During this period the material culture of the people remained same as in preceding Chalcolithic period. Only change was the introduction of iron in the Middle Ganga Plains. The tradition of painting takes a dramatic turn by its reappearance in the Middle Ganga Plain. In this area the pottery was painted with white linear designs. The B. R. W. was relegated to a sub-ordinate position of being just an associated ceramic industry. In this area both plain and painted B. R. W. are found. Thus, it is obvious that Black-and-Red wares occur in different archaeological context. 165 References- (1). Wheeler, R-E.M., “Brahmaigiri and Chandravalli 1947; Megalithic and other cultures in Mysore state,’’ Ancient India, No.4. (July, 1947- January, 1948), P- 200 and 202. (2). Wheeler, R.E.M., Early India and Pakistan (London, 1960), p.163. (3). Majumdar, G.G., The problem of Black-and-Red ware; A Technological Approach in (Ed).A.K. Narain, Megaliths in India, (Banaras, 1969) (4). Sinha, B. P., Archaeology of Bihar. K.P. JRI (Patna 1988) p. 82 (5). Ibid. p. 82 (6). Ibid. p. 83 (1). LAR, 1981- 82, p. 10- 12 (8). Sinha, B.P, 1988. op. cit., p83 (9). Tiwari, R. RK. Srivastava, K.K. Singh, and K.S Saraswat.2005-6, Further Excavation at Lahuradeva, District (U.P.) Pragdhara No.16, Journal of the up state Archaeological Organization (Lucknow), Puratattva No. 36, pp.68-75, (10).1AR, 1966-67; p.6 (11).[bid, p.6 166

You might also like