1.

Introduction

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of this review checklist document is to facilitate thorough and consistent reviews of
software design documents within our project. By providing a structured checklist, we aim to
ensure that all aspects of the software design are thoroughly evaluated for quality, completeness,
and adherence to project requirements and standards.

1.2 Scope

This review checklist covers various aspects of software design documents, including system
architecture, component design, data design, user interface design, security design, testing and
quality assurance considerations, change management procedures, compliance with standards,
and overall completeness and consistency.

1.3 Audience

The intended audience for this review checklist includes developers, architects, testers, project
managers, and other stakeholders involved in the software development process. Each role can
benefit from using the checklist to ensure that software design documents meet the necessary
standards and requirements.

1.4 How to Use This Checklist

To use this checklist effectively, follow these steps:

1. Review the checklist to familiarize yourself with the criteria and items to be evaluated.

2. Schedule a review meeting with relevant stakeholders, assigning roles and responsibilities for
the review.

3. Use the checklist to systematically evaluate each section of the software design document,
noting any discrepancies or areas for improvement.

4. Capture review feedback and discuss any issues or concerns raised during the review meeting.
5. Update the design document based on review feedback, incorporating necessary changes and
improvements.

1.5 Review Process

Reviews using this checklist will be conducted as part of the software development lifecycle.
Review meetings will be scheduled at appropriate milestones, with participation from key
stakeholders. Reviewers will collaborate to ensure that all aspects of the software design
document are thoroughly evaluated and any issues are addressed promptly.

1.6 Document Conventions

Throughout this checklist, the following conventions are used:

 Checkbox: Indicates an item to be reviewed. Check the box if the criteria are met.

 N/A: Indicates that the item is not applicable to the current review. Mark as N/A
if the criteria do not apply.

 Severity Levels: Severity levels may be assigned to indicate the importance or

urgency of addressing a particular issue.

1.7 Revision History

Version 1.0 (Date: april/30/2024)

 Initial release of the review checklist document.

Creating a software quality assurance (QA) review checklist for a software design document
involves focusing on ensuring that the document is clear, comprehensive, and aligned with
project requirements and best practices. Here's a checklist:
 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1. Document Structure  the document title,

and Organization author, department, and
submission details
clearly mentioned

 The document includes a

table of contents for easy
navigation.

 Sections are logically

organized, with clear
headings and
subheadings.

 Consistent formatting
(font style, size, color,
etc.) is applied
throughout the
document.

 Figures, diagrams, and

tables are appropriately
labeled and referenced.

 The document has a clear

title, page number, and
date.

2. Scope and Objectives  The document clearly

defines the scope of the
 software project.

 Objectives and goals of

the software design are
stated clearly.

 Stakeholders and their

roles are identified.

3. System Architecture  Overall system

architecture is
described, including
components, modules,
and their interactions.

 Design patterns and

architectural styles used
are documented.

 Scalability,
performance, and
reliability
considerations are
addressed.

 Interfaces with external

systems or APIs are
specified.

4. Component Design  Detailed design of

individual
 components/modules is
provided.

 Data structures and

algorithms used are
explained.

 Class diagrams,
sequence diagrams, and
other relevant diagrams
are included.

 Error handling and

exception handling
mechanisms are
described.

5. Data Design  Data model and

schema are defined.

 Database design,
including tables,
relationships, and
constraints, is
documented.

 Data migration and

data validation
strategies are outlined.

6. User Interface Design  User interface

 wireframes or
mockups are included.

 Navigation flow and

interaction design are
described.

 Accessibility
considerations are
addressed.

 Consistency with
branding and design
guidelines is ensured.

7. Completeness and  Does the document

Accuracy cover all relevant
aspects of the design
for the Internship and
Career Management
System?

 Are all requirements

from the analysis phase
addressed in the
design?

 Are all diagrams,

tables, and figures
referenced in the text
and correctly labeled?
8. Consistency and Clarity  Are there any
inconsistencies or
contradictions within the
document?

 Is the terminology used

consistent throughout the
document?

 Are all abbreviations and

acronyms defined and
used consistently?

9. Compliance with  Does the design adhere

Standards to any specified design
standards or
guidelines?

 Are there references to

relevant industry
standards or best
practices?

 Is the document
compliant with any
organizational
templates or formatting
guidelines?

10. Traceability and Cross  Are there clear

Referencing traceability links
between requirements,
 analysis, and design
elements?

 Do all design
decisions trace back to
specific requirements
or user needs?

 Is there cross
references between
different sections of
the document for easy
navigation?

11. Feasibility and  Does the design address

Maintainability the feasibility of
implementation within
the given constraints?

 Are there considerations

for system
maintainability,
scalability, and
extensibility?

 Are potential risks and

mitigation strategies
identified in the design?
12. Security Design  Security requirements
and threats are identified.

 Authentication and
authorization
mechanisms are
specified.

 Data encryption and

privacy measures are
described.

 Compliance with
security standards and
regulations is
documented.

13. Testing and Quality  Testing strategies,

Assurance including unit testing,
integration testing, and
acceptance testing, are
outlined.

 Quality attributes such

as performance,
reliability, and usability
are addressed in the
design.

 Measures for code

quality control, such as
code reviews and static
 analysis, are mentioned.

 Documentation includes
guidelines for
developers to ensure
adherence to the design
during implementation.

 Plans for design reviews

and updates are
included.

14. User Interface and User Is the user interface design

Experience described in sufficient detail?

 Are user interactions,

workflows, and
navigation paths
clearly outlined?

 Is there consideration
for usability and
accessibility
requirements?

15. Change Management  Procedures for

handling design
changes and updates
are documented.

 Version control and

 configuration
management processes
are described.

 Impact analysis for

proposed changes is
provided.

16. References and  Are all external

Citations references, standards,
and sources properly
cited?

 Do references to external
documents or research
align with the content in
the design document?

 Are there any missing

references that should be
included for credibility
and accuracy?