WP Kennzahlen en
WP Kennzahlen en
Key performance
indicators in pro-
duct development
Systematically evaluate and continuously
improve innovation productivity
© CONTACT Software GmbH. All rights reserved. After the editorial deadline for this publication
there have been some changes. All information without guarantee.
Contents
1 Preface 4
2 Challenge 6
6 Summary 19
7 Glossary 21
8 List of abbreviations 23
9 References 25
Preface
1
Preface 5
The continuous improvement of (business) processes If development processes are to be managed more
and products is crucial to the competitiveness of a efficiently and the effectiveness of the R&D organization
company. It is expected that products be developed and improved, meaningful KPIs that identify weak points
improved ever faster and cheaper. That is why KPIs that and potential in the processes are needed. This was the
provide information about a company’s innovation aim of the Process Indicators for Product Engineering
productivity have become increasingly important in (PIPE) initiative launched by the VDMA in cooperation
recent years. These KPIs help decision-makers systemat- with leading PLM software and service providers such as
ically measure, evaluate and manage products and CONTACT Software, Dassault and IBM. Appropriate KPIs
processes. KPIs can be used to make interrelationships for product development and core processes such as
and important information within a company transpar- change, project and configuration management are
ent. available in a VDMA guideline [1].
A wide variety KPIs have long been collected in depart- This white paper describes the requirements relating to
ments like the production department with the aim of performance indicator management in the product
monitoring the quality of the manufactured compo- development process and explains the processes and
nents and the performance of the production processes advantages of the continuous and automated collection
and optimizing them in the context of a continuous of KPIs in operative product lifecycle management
improvement process (CIP). Although universally (PLM) systems.
accepted KPIs for evaluating production processes, such
as those specified by the German Mechanical Engineer-
ing Industry Association (VDMA) (VDMA Standard Sheet
66412-1 MES KPIs) exist, assertions about the effective-
ness and efficiency of product development are gener-
ally not very reliable.
6
Challenge
2
Challenge 7
Performance indicator
management
3
Performance indicator management 9
Figure 1:
KPIs and performance
define measure
change evaluate
KPIs are a tool that can be used for controlling and product development are presented below.
quality assurance purposes. They serve to translate
generally formulated corporate objectives or project Time-to-Market (TtM)
requirements into concrete or measurable targets, If companies use the TtM method, the timing of the
evaluate the results achieved and highlight future market launch is determined before product devel-
developments. opment starts. The aim of TtM management is to
optimize the innovation process in terms of time.
Performance indicator management is crucial to the This means that innovative products – from the
successful handling of KPIs. It integrates multiple initial idea to market launch – are planned in such a
object and process KPIs and provides the following way that they are launched onto the market at the
management tools for work performed in this con- economically optimum time [2].
text: define, measure, evaluate and change.
A company must define a product development Design to X
method before products, projects or processes can A somewhat more comprehensive approach is
be evaluated using KPIs or performance measure- provided by design to X (also design for X), which
ment systems. focuses on the product. Measurable attributes or
target values such as weight or cost are defined for a
product. This assignment makes it possible to moni-
Product development tor the specified targets during development.
Table 1:
Overview of KPIs KPI Determination Sample KPIs
Relation Numbers Different variables with a meaningful Unit costs, return on investment,
(relative numbers) connection are correlated throughput time, return on sales
Key performance indicators product KPIs in the context of design to X and project
KPIs are defined as highly condensed metrics that KPIs for traditional project controlling is to make the
provide information about a fact that can be ex- handling of routine operational business more
pressed in numbers in a more precise, coordinated efficient.
and documented manner than can be provided by
ratios or absolute numbers, provide information Product attributes and product-specific targets
about developments within a company and consti- include costs, weight, installation space, consump-
tute strategic success factors [4]. In most cases, ratios tion and emissions. For example, the progress of an
provide information about cause-and-effect correla- individual project can be illustrated in the form of an
tions or, as indices, illustrate evolution of a value over earned-value or milestone trend analysis.
time. The following table lists different types of KPIs
[5]: Process KPIs
Process KPIs, on the other hand, describe the attri-
When it comes to controlling product development, butes of a business process and evaluate the attri-
another type of differentiation, namely between butes of several objects accordingly. Process KPIs
object and process-oriented KPIs, makes sense. that look at the performance of the organization or
While object KPIs support controlling for individual certain core processes include, for example, the
products and projects, process-oriented KPIs form throughput times for technical changes or adherence
the basis for continuous process improvements [4]. to schedules when processing orders. They docu-
ment average values from a set of individual values,
Object KPIs such as the throughput times for all the technical
Object KPIs always describe the attributes of exactly changes within a certain period. In addition, they
one object: a product or a project. The purpose of allow comparisons to be made in order to identify
Performance indicator management 11
trends, for example over specific periods of time. clarify each other. A distinction is made between
Process KPIs make it easier to identify weak points in one- dimensional and multidimensional perfor-
the processes and thus form the basis for continuous mance measurement systems, depending on wheth-
process improvements. er they yield a single monetary KPI or several both
monetary and non-monetary KPIs [4].
The definition of conclusive process KPIs also pro-
vides the basis for determining the maturity of the One-dimensional performance measurement
organization and its business processes. Many com- systems
panies use the Capability Maturity Model Integration The ROI tree, one of the oldest (one-dimensional)
(CMMI) approach to identify potential for rationaliza- performance measurement systems, was developed
tion and implement process improvements. CMMI by DuPont. Only past monetary values are included
provides a variety of reference models for assessing in the ROI tree [7].
the processes and the strengths and weaknesses of
an organization, including companies that develop Multidimensional performance measurement
software, systems or hardware (CMMI-DEV). These systems
reference models combine the best practices from The use of multidimensional performance measure-
certain process areas (e.g. project planning, require- ment systems makes it possible to take a holistic
ments engineering, etc.) but without providing approach. Not only financial KPIs such as sales or
concrete instructions for their implementation [6]. profit but also actors, processes and values like
customer satisfaction are taken into consideration
Interpreting KPIs here. Examples of multidimensional performance
KPIs provide aggregated information. How this measurement systems include the Balanced Score-
information is interpreted and which conclusions are card (BSC) and Total Quality Management (TQM)
drawn or forecasts are made will depend on the approaches.
person analyzing the data[4]. The often high number ■■ BSC: Deriving concrete measures and criteria from
of impacting factors means that care must be taken business practices and quality-related specifica-
when measuring and interpreting key process data in tions for evaluations poses a challenge for many
particular. For example, it may be useful to classify companies. The BSC approach provides assistance
technical changes according to product areas and in this context. The BSC is a systematic concept for
release status (in development, sample/prototype, in measuring, documenting and managing concrete
series production) in order to draw the correct con- activities, such as measures for achieving strategic
clusions about the efficiency of change management goals (e.g. reducing development costs), in a
from the automatically calculated throughput times. company. This involves not only taking a look at
the financial aspects but also the customer‘s point
of view, such as customer satisfaction, process
Performance measurement quality and employee potential as well as long-
term prospects for growth. A performance mea-
systems surement system that is tailored to the organiza-
In many cases, individual KPIs alone do not allow the tion in question is developed on the basis of critical
development of products or the effectiveness of success factors and a cause-and-effect analysis [8].
processes to be assessed accurately. Only in combi- ■■ TQM: The TQM approach is essentially based on a
nation with other indicators, e.g. as part of a more self-assessment of the organization in which the
comprehensive performance measurement system, actors and processes on the one hand and the
do they allow further evaluations such as the reasons results on the other are evaluated and correlated
for success or failure or the potential opportunities with each other [9].
and risks of entrepreneurial activity. A performance
measurement system refers to a set of variables that
are related to each other, complement each other or
12 Performance indicator management
Performance
measurement systems
Multidimensional
One-dimensional performance
performance measurement
measurement systems
systems
Success-oriented
Value-based performance Balanced Scorecard
performance
measurement systems (BSC)
measurement systems
DuPont-Scheme:
Discounted Cash Flow Total Quality Management
Return on Investment
(DCF) (TQM)
(ROI)
4
14 PLM-integrated performance indicator management
The development of performance indicator manage- The integration of performance indicator manage-
ment capability not only determines which KPIs are ment, which supports both case-by-case analysis
to be evaluated but also the IT solution that will pro- and process analysis, makes certain demands on the
vide performance indicator management support. architecture of the PLM solution with regard to the
The architecture of powerful PLM solutions makes definition of object classes and KPI types. Useful in
it possible for them to prepare and make available this context is a framework that makes it possible to
both object-oriented and process-oriented KPIs. This define KPIs for both objects and object classes, auto-
means that they can provide simultaneous support matically calculate the actual values of KPIs at freely
for different performance indicator management selectable intervals, automatically aggregate actual
applications and create synergies between them, i.e. values via object structures, record their history and
allow KPIs that have already been determined to be define targets for certain KPIs using formulas. In addi-
used in different forms for different roles and tasks – tion, comprehensive performance indicator manage-
from product management to project management ment requires tools for an appropriate representation
and process development through to corporate of all the elements comprising a KPI and of the full
management. set of KPIs defined and available in the system. It
must be able to display all parameter values defined
One particular performance feature of PLM-inte- for an object or class together with the associated
grated performance indicator management is the target values and levels of fulfillment.
possibility of defining actions if recorded values
deviate from the target specifications and to track Performance indicator management in PLM systems
them in the PLM context. This means that the actions can also be linked to other functional areas such as
are recorded together with the (estimated) impact on requirements management, for example to define
the desired target or target value and the associated KPIs for continuous monitoring of critical require-
costs so that product developers or quality assurance ments.
staff can assess, on the basis of a graphical presen-
tation, which combination of actions will enable the Product-oriented performance indicator
target to be achieved at the lowest possible cost. At management
the same time, the impact of the actions taken are in the PLM context allows developers to take account
monitored with the aid of automatically recorded of a number of different criteria. Product properties
KPIs so that additional action can be taken if there is can be evaluated continuously by automatically
still a gap between target and actual values. deriving certain parameters from the CAD system or
the calculation tool and aggregating them if neces-
Users are provided with the following management sary (e.g. the weight of the individual parts). Similarly,
tools (see Figure 1): the KPIs for project controlling can be aggregated at
different levels of detail in order to obtain an ongoing
1. Define KPIs view of the current project status.
2. Measure processes and products using KPIs
3. Display and evaluate information Process-oriented key indicator management
4. Change or improve processes and products simplifies the task of identifying potential improve-
„
ments in the development organization based on
KPIs that provide information on the performance
A special feature of a PLM integrated of certain core processes such as change, project or
configuration management. The corresponding KPIs
key figure management is the possibility can be tracked over time. This allows the benefits of
to check for deviations from the targets certain organizational changes or the introduction of
new PLM tools to be assessed.
define corrective actions and track
them in the PLM context
PLM-integrated performance indicator management 15
Integration of external data Integration in the PLM system is, however, even more
important when it comes to the process KPIs as they
sources often involve automatically recorded and/or aggre-
There is a wide variety of IT solutions for the different gated data. The process data comes from MES or ERP
application areas within the value chain. Far-sighted, systems and can be transferred to the PLM system
cross-system analysis can only be carried out using a and updated automatically via interfaces. This allows
central performance indicator management solution interactions to be mapped within a system using
[10]. KPIs.
Project Product
5
CONTACT Metrics & Reporting 17
Action management
Another potential application is integrated action # new New=…
management in which actions to be taken in the
… total and after ECR, ECO phase in
event of discrepancies in the target ranges are %-set discarded relation to total ECs started and ended
defined. The predicted effect on the achievement of in the reference period
the target and the costs associated with them can be Ø throughput … activation to completion, total and
stored here. This allows a comprehensive analysis of time after ECR, ECO, ECN phase
which combination of actions will enable the target … total and after ECR, ECO phase in
%-set with
to be achieved at the lowest possible cost to be per- relation to total ECs started and com-
correction
pleted in the reference period
formed. The success of the actions can be monitored
continuously. This is where values such as material Table 2:
costs, for example, are specified. Example Engineering Change
18 CONTACT Metrics & Reporting
KPI cockpits: visualization, The following figure shows an example of the display
of a process-related KPI in the KPI cockpit. The visual
evaluation and reporting display of the KPI cockpit is divided into two parts. At
KPI cockpits are intuitive, integrated web applica- the top, there is a chart showing the development of
tions in which achievement of the target, history and the KPI over time on the left and a diagram of the
actions defined for the individual KPIs are displayed. measures initiated on the right. The individual KPIs
The actual KPI values are automatically recorded in for projects are listed below the process view.
the history so that trend recognition is possible for
each KPI. Target ranges, actual values and actions
can also be entered and edited directly here.
The reporting mechanism provides users with a
variety of different display options: display of the
evolution of the value over time, evaluation of the
relationships between different parameters and the
comparison of objects and processes. The key fea-
tures of the KPI cockpit include
Figure 4:
Example of process KPIs
Summary
6
20 Summary
„ PLM-integrated key figure management Software applications like Metrics & Reporting from
CONTACT Software offer an approach that enables
visualization contributes to the as well as the entire innovation process to be managed and
dashboard and reporting functions more evaluated using defined KPIs.
transparency in the company.. The key synergy effect of PLM integration is the ability
to define uniform procedures that can be controlled
centrally for all processes, record critical values auto-
The continuous improvement of (business) processes matically and continuously and display them in real
and products is crucial to the competitiveness of a time with the help of powerful dashboard and report-
company. It is expected that products be developed ing functions. PLM-integrated performance indicator
and improved ever faster and cheaper. management thus makes a significant contribution
to increasing transparency within a company.
The developers and design engineers in companies The translation of corporate objectives into corre-
are facing a host of challenges when it comes to sponding metrics and their ultimate evaluation is a
product development. In addition to target costs, matter for the companies themselves and requires
they have to comply with increasingly strict statutory employees with the requisite skills.
requirements regarding safety, environmental com-
patibility, energy consumption, etc. as they work and
they need to clearly document their compliance. The
number of critical requirements or product attributes
that have to be monitored during development is
steadily growing. Compliance management is an
integral part of controlling development processes
today.
7
22 Glossary
8
24 List of abbreviations
Abbreviation Explanation
BSC Balanced Scorecard
CAD Computer-Aided Design
CIP Continuous Improvement Process
CMMI Capability Maturity Model Integration
CMMI DEV Capability Maturity Model Integration Development
EC Engineering Change
ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
R&D Research & Development
KPI Key Performance Indicator
MES Manufacturing Execution Systems
PDM Product data management
PIPE Process Indicators for Product Engineering
PLM Product Lifecycle Management
ROI Return on Investment
RQM Requirements Management
TQM Total Quality Management
TtM Time-to-Market
VDMA Verband Deutscher Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
References
9
26 References
[1] VDMA. Process Indicators for Product Engineering (PIPE): Engineering Prozesse einheitlich bewerten. VDMA
Verlag, 2013.
[2] Michael Nippa and Fabio Labriola. Roadmapping als integrative Planungsmethode im Rahmen eines situa-
tionsgerechten Time-to-Market Management. Technologie-Roadmapping. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
[3] Klaus Ehrlenspiel and Harald Meerkamm. Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz,
Zusammenarbeit. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG, 2013.
[5] Nicole Zeise (2010): Modellierung von Kennzahlensystemen mit BPMN. In: Lecture Notes in Informatics
(LNI)-Proceedings - Series of the Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) Volume P-160/63. ISBN 978-3-88579-254-3.
[8] Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton. Balanced Scorecard-Strategien erfolgreich umsetzen. 1st edition,
Schäffer-Poeschel, 1997.
[9] European Foundation of Quality Management. EFQM. Available at: http://www.efqm.org/ [Accessed:
16.07.2018].
[10] it-production. Wechselwirkungen von ERP- und MES-Kennzahlen - Stellschrauben für die Wertschöpfungs-
kette. Available at: https://www.it-production.com/allgemein/wechselwirkungen-von-erp-und-mes-kennzah-
lenstellschrauben-fuer-die-wertschoepfungskette/ [Accessed: 16.07.2018].
contact-software.com