School Geography Curriculum Guide
School Geography Curriculum Guide
To cite this article: Alan Kinder & Eleanor Rawling (2023) The GA’s Framework for the school
geography curriculum, Geography, 108:2, 101-106, DOI: 10.1080/00167487.2023.2217633
Spotlight On …
The GA’s
Framework for the
school geography
curriculum
Spotlight On … Introduction
In the autumn of 2022, the Geographical
Association (GA) published A framework for the
educational considerations should inform the knowledge rather than just an accumulation of
Spotlight On … development of the school curriculum. Crucially, it world facts. Similarly, disciplinary knowledge is
clarifies the relationship between disciplinary and only meaningful when applied and developed in the
The GA’s
substantive knowledge. Substantive knowledge particular contexts of places, environments, topics
Framework for the comprises the ‘facts and information about and themes.
school geography phenomena in the world’ (GA, 2022, p. 5) that
curriculum populate the themes and topics of any school The framework also summarises key
curriculum (Figure 2) and provides the context considerations around progression, distinguishing
within which disciplinary understanding is between the sequencing of curriculum inputs
developed. Substantive and disciplinary knowledge planned by the teacher and the outlining of
work together: knowledge about the world must be expected outcomes of pupil learning. Both tasks
shaped by disciplinary understanding and require a clear understanding of how the subject
approaches in order to become geographical works if they are to result in high-quality geography
Aims
Curricula based on this framework should provide opportunities for: promoting curiosity about the world;
inspiring wonder, joy and passion; understanding the key concepts, distinctive practices, skills and
applications of the subject; appreciating dynamic links and interrelationships; addressing real-world issues;
promoting personal/moral development, independent thinking, and the development of informed, engaged
citizens.
Disciplinary knowledge
Features of the discipline significant for school geography3
How geographers think and know How geographers find out – How geographers apply
– thinking like a geographer working like a geographer. knowledge – making use of
geography
Includes learning how key Includes undertaking the skills,
concepts and conceptual methods and approaches of Applying knowledge,
frameworks help us make sense geographical enquiry; the understanding and skills to real-
of the world and allow us to argumentation/analysis involved world challenges and issues –
generate new ideas; clarifying the in confirming how we know what living peacefully and productively
distinctiveness of geographical we know; recognition of the with others and ensuring our
thought values and moral/ethical future on the planet
dimensions involved in any
Place, Space, Earth Systems, enquiry and development of one’s Learning about application and
Environment own moral and ethical stance young people learning to apply for
themselves
Time, Scale, Diversity, Qualitative and quantitative
Interconnection, Interpretation enquiry in classroom and field;
personal development
Substantive knowledge
Lies behind and supports all disciplinary knowledge3
‘Knowing about’
The full range of contextual and specific knowledge of the world around us (often called world knowledge)
including locational knowledge; tangible features such as rivers, mountains, cities, countries and landscapes;
also more abstract features such as economic systems, community beliefs, everyday practices and
imaginative place representations
All curriculum development requires a selection of substantive content to be made. A minimum entitlement of
substantive knowledge is necessary for a national-level curriculum to ensure consistency across schools.
Figure 2: Curriculum
Further selection of content should be made by those developing the curriculum, e.g. exam boards, resource
aims, disciplinary and
providers, schools and teachers. Criteria for selection initially derive from the Curriculum framework, but will
substantive knowledge
be added to later by curriculum developers to address other purposes at national, sub-national and
102 components. Source: GA,
school level.
2022.
GEOGRAPHY vol108-part2.qxp_Layout 1 25.05.2023 13:13 Page 103
The GA’s Curriculum framework lies above national level and offers potential at all levels.
3 Classroom School geography Broad departmental plans for geography in the school;
teacher level departments and stage plans and year plans, sequences of topics
individual geography Detailed development and interpretation of schemes
teachers of work, lesson plans and decisions about resources
and experiences to provide (including fieldwork)
Figure 3: Levels of
curriculum development
Planning of professional development opportunities
and planning for
geography. Source: GA
Plans for implementing the departmental assessment
(2022), after Rawling, 103
strategy and commitment to review lessons/courses
2007; 2020a.
GEOGRAPHY vol108-part2.qxp_Layout 1 25.05.2023 13:13 Page 104
using the criteria developed, select a minimum follows this approach, since it comprises ‘a
Spotlight On … entitlement of substantive content to provide a number of highly-prescriptive (if not always precise)
sound and consistent basis for pupil requirements for teaching’ (Kinder, 2015, p. 80),
The GA’s
progression, and that provides access to key with these requirements focused predominantly on
Framework for the ‘[p]lace and locational knowledge … alongside
concepts, allows inclusion of a range of time
school geography periods and scales and promotes opportunities knowledge of human and physical processes and
curriculum to address diversity, interconnection and some technical procedures, such as map skills’
interpretation (ibid.). This approach tends to offer ‘a limited diet
• leave room for awarding organisations and of “facts” and low-level skills’ (Morgan, 2017, p.
publishers to make selections, and for 24) and to give limited attention to geography’s
teachers to select content appropriate to their disciplinary components. Given that progression in
setting and expertise geographical knowledge and skills rests on
• decide on monitoring and assessment disciplinary as well as substantive content, this
strategies: outline broad outcomes for approach can also create profound difficulties for
conceptual understanding and skill implementation, particularly around progression
development. If a national assessment system and assessment. Such was the outcome of the
is desired, define a minimum entitlement of 1991 National Curriculum for England and Wales
content to provide the context for assessment (Lambert and Hopkin, 2014).
criteria.
The second type of response is to set out the
geographical concepts and/or skills required
Why the framework is without specifying the minimum entitlement of
needed substantive content needed to provide real-world
substance and context for their development. The
In one sense, the framework follows on from
Humanities Area of Learning and Experience (AoLE)
earlier statements by the GA concerning the
currently in force in Wales is of this type,
nature, scope and purposes of geography in
consisting of ‘statements of what matters’,
education. Noteworthy examples from the past
‘principles of progression’ and ‘descriptions of
include A Case for Geography (Bailey and Binns,
learning’ (Wales Government, n.d.) but ‘there is no
1987), which was credited with earning geography
minimum entitlement of knowledge, no criteria for
its ‘place in the sun’ within the first national
further selection of content, no well-defined
curriculum for England and Wales (Bailey, 1989, p.
progression threads in each subject’ (Rawling,
149), and A Different View: A manifesto from the
2020b, p. 101). In Morgan’s colourful phrasing,
Geographical Association (GA, 2009) – an initiative ‘[o]ne of the dangers of this approach is that the
to communicate the potential of the school subject answer to “what is geography?” ends up being
across the geography education community and to quite ethereal and almost “mystical”‘ (2017, p.
a wider audience. However, the framework is a new 24).
kind of curriculum policy initiative, rather than a
recasting or confirmation of what has gone before. A connected set of issues with national curriculum
In particular, the framework responds to the requirements therefore concerns the licence and
significant educational and professional issues guidance they provide for professionals working at
attributed to successive national curricula, since other levels within the system. An overly-
their first iterations appeared across England, prescriptive approach reduces the ability of those
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in the early responsible for developing qualifications,
1990s. assessment systems, textbook materials, or
indeed for planning at the school level, to create
One set of issues concerns the failure of national distinctive, creative or locally-appropriate
requirements to translate the structure of specifications, publications and curricula –
geographical knowledge into a curriculum context producing a kind of curriculum ‘straitjacket’
with the necessary fidelity. Morgan (2017) (Lambert and Hopkin, 2014, p. 71). Conversely,
observes ‘there have been two types of responses loosely-written or sparing national guidelines place
to the question of what knowledge to include in too great a demand on teachers and others in
school geography curricula, neither of which are, I respect of curriculum development. Government
think, sufficient’ (p. 24). The first of these is to guidance in Wales, as explained above, places
mandate (sometimes in specific detail) the almost all the responsibility for creating a
substantive content to be taught. The 2013 balanced, structured curriculum on schools (Wales
Geography National Curriculum for England Government, n.d.). and begs the question of how
104
(Department for Education [DfE], 2013) arguably there can truly be a Welsh national curriculum if
GEOGRAPHY vol108-part2.qxp_Layout 1 25.05.2023 13:13 Page 105
International Research in Geographical and Royal Society of Chemistry (2020) The Elements of a
Environmental Education, 23, 1, pp. 64–78. Successful Chemistry Curriculum: The Royal Society of
https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.858446 Chemistry’s vision for 11–19 chemistry education.
Morgan, J. (2017) ‘The making of geographical Available at https://www.rsc.org/globalassets/22-new-
ignorance?’, Geography, 102, 1, pp. 18–25. perspectives/talent/chemistry-curriculum-framework/c
https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2017.12094005 hemistry-curriculum-brochure.pdf
Rawling, E. (2007) Planning Your Key Stage 3 Geography Tracy, C. (2018) ‘Guidelines for future physics curricula’,
Curriculum. Sheffield: Geographical Association. School Science Review, 370, pp. 36–43. Available at
Rawling, E. (2015) ‘Curriculum change and examination https://www.ase.org.uk/resources/school-science-
reform for geography 14–19’, Geography, 100, 3, pp. review/issue-370/guidelines-future-physics-curricula
164–8. Wales Government (n.d.) Area of Learning and Experience:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2015.12093972 Humanities. Available at
Rawling, E. (2020a) ‘How and why national curriculum https://hwb.gov.wales/curriculum-for-
frameworks are failing geography’, Geography, 105, 2, wales/humanities/statements-of-what-matters
pp. 69–77.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2020.12094091 All URLs last accessed 22/5/2023.
Rawling, E. (2020b) ‘Geography in the Welsh curriculum;
a good idea but…’, Teaching Geography, 45, 3
Alan Kinder is Chief Executive of the
(Autumn), pp. 101–4. Available at
https://portal.geography.org.uk/downloads/journals/T
Geographical Association, Sheffield, UK
G_AUT_2020_RAWLING.pdf (email: [email protected]; Twitter:
Royal Society of Biology (2021) Evolving 5–19 Biology: @GAChiefExec). Eleanor Rawling is an
Recommendations and framework for 5–19 biology Independent Consultant and Author (email:
curricula. Available at [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0003-4572-
https://www.rsb.org.uk/images/Evolving_5- 2739).
19_Biology.pdf