Energy Storage Report 2024
Energy Storage Report 2024
energy-storage.news
Our commitment to delivering world-class integrated energy storage solutions Proud sponsor of
to our customers is built upon employing cutting-edge renewable energy
conversion and best-in-class battery technology.
Investing in early stage businesses involves risks, including illiquidity, lack of dividends, loss of investment
and dilution and it should be done only as part ot a diversified portfolio. It is targeted exclusively at investors
who are sufficiently sophisticated to understand these risks and make their own investment decisions. You www.RheEnergise.com
will only be able to invest once you have confirmed you are sufficiently sophisticated.
Base (MCB) had been switched off by Duke Energy, the energy
company tasked with building the project.
Duke Energy confirmed the accuracy of the report in a state-
ment given to Energy-Storage.news by company director of
communications and public affairs Kaitlin Kirshner, who said
Duke Energy did not believe the equipment itself posed a threat
but that the system has been switched off until the matter is
The Edwards Sanborn solar-plus-storage project in California
resolved.
According to Reuters, the decision was made following high-
LFP cell average falls below US$100/kWh as battery profile accusations by US lawmakers that CATL – the world’s
pack prices drop to record low in 2023 largest manufacturer and supplier of lithium-ion batteries – is
After a difficult couple of years which saw the trend of falling directly funded and enjoys support from the Chinese Commu-
lithium battery prices temporarily reverse, a 14% drop in lithium-ion nist Party.
(Li-ion) battery pack cost from 2022-2023 has been recorded by CATL, for its part, strongly refuted the allegations, publishing
BloombergNEF. a statement in early December 2023. It described the accusa-
On average, pack prices fell 14% from 2022 levels to a record tions that its batteries posed security threats as “false and
low of US$139/kWh this year. This reduction was driven by the misleading”.
dynamics of falling raw material and component prices, and
increases in production capacity. Northvolt and Altris develop ‘breakthrough’ 160 Wh/kg
However, despite the good news, BloombergNEF (BNEF) no sodium-ion battery for energy storage
longer expects to find average pack prices fall below US$100/ Gigafactory company Northvolt and sodium-ion battery technol-
kWh by 2024 (as it predicted in 2020), nor by 2026 (as it predicted ogy firm Altris have together revealed a battery with an energy
last year). It will however be likely to happen before the end of this density of 160 Wh/kg, designed for energy storage systems.
decade, with BNEF forecasting that the average pack will cost The firms revealed the battery’s energy density following a
about US$113/kWh in 2025, and decline in cost sharply to around research partnership and Northvolt’s investment in Altris in May
US$80/kWh by 2030. 2022.
Sodium-ion battery technology is widely seen to be the most
EU approves Italy’s €17.7 billion state aid for large-scale commercially mature electrochemical-based alternative to
energy storage rollout lithium-ion. For comparison, lithium-ion technology generally
The European Union (EU) Commission has approved a state aid has a Wh/kg energy density of between 120 and 260, accord-
scheme aiming to fund the rollout of over 9GW/71GWh of energy ing to the International Energy Agency (IEA) in its Global EV
storage in Italy. Outlook 2023.
Figure 3. A record-breaking 9.6GW of capacity was approved Figure 4. Built capacity is likely to rise substantially in the
in planning in 2023 near future
Figure 2 is a visual representation of the project pipeline The submitted capacity started to increase again in 2021
analysis with a focus on projects scheduled for completion in and, therefore, so did the approved capacity; partly due to the
2024. increase in the 50MW planning threshold, and because devel-
With reference to Figure 2: initially, we filtered out small opers gained more experience in the services available, leading
sites with a capacity of less than 5MW. Then, we removed to more attractive revenue streams.
any projects that have not yet submitted a full application. In 2022, the total capacity of newly submitted projects
After this, we only considered the projects that have obtained reached a record high of 23GW. These projects were approved
planning approval, and among those, we filtered out the ones in 2022 and 2023, with most of the capacity given the green
that have not yet been awarded a capacity agreement; this light in 2023. This is because there are more large-scale
gives all the Short-Term Prospects. projects and these generally have a longer planning process.
The Short-term Prospects are any projects that have an The total amount of capacity that has now been approved
application approved and have also been awarded a capac- in planning, since the market began, is at 32.9GW across 957
ity agreement. The 2024 site prospects are already under sites.
construction and are expected to be completed during this
year. The pattern of submitted, approved and built
By the end of 2024, the operational capacity of energy capacities
storage is likely to increase by 3.3GW/6.7GWh, bringing Looking at the rise of submitted, approved and built capaci-
the total capacity to 7.3GW/11.6GWh. By 2026/2027, this ties, there is a clear (linear) relationship between submitted and
figure has the potential to reach up to 14GW/25.9GWh. This approved capacity. This is evident from the data presented in
includes 11 projects of size 100MW and larger – including one Figure 4.
as big as 500MW – with a duration of at least two hours. Although the build-out of these projects started slowly, there
is still some linearity between the approved and built capac-
How much capacity was approved in planning last ity, but it is not immediately obvious. However, in the previous
year? graphs in this article, there is a similar pattern between the two.
Last year (2023), a remarkable 9.6GW capacity was granted Therefore, the built capacity is likely to soar in the very near
approval in planning, out of which more than 50% was from future.
projects exceeding 100MW in size. It is worth noting that such In conclusion, everything points to a rapid increase in the
projects of this magnitude have only recently been initiated. operational capacity of energy storage in the UK going forward.
Only since 2022 have projects of this size really started to This is evident from the year-on-year increase in built capaci-
come into play. ties, the upcoming short-term prospect sites that are expected
Figure 3 shows the approved capacity of battery storage, by to be completed in the next few years, the increasing amount
project size and by year. of capacity approved in planning, and the linear relationship
The first surge in 2017 was due to a significant increase in between submitted, approved and built capacities.
the number of applications submitted for battery storage that
year. The success of some projects in the Enhanced Frequen- All data and analysis shown in this article comes from
cy Response (EFR) auction in 2016 motivated many develop- our in-house market research at Solar Media Ltd.
ers to submit more applications. However, after this surge, the Full details on how to subscribe to our ‘UK Battery
rate of submitted capacity slowed down, resulting in a similar Storage Project Database Report’ can be found at
trend in the yearly approved capacity. bit.ly/ukstorage
Italy
As readers of Energy-Storage.news will know, Italy is set to
become one of the busiest grid-scale BESS markets in the
coming years.
Following growth in its renewable energy goals and deploy-
ment pipeline, transmission system operator (TSO) Terna has
spent the last few years consulting with the industry on how to
facilitate energy storage on its grid, projecting that 9GW/71GWh
needs to come online by 2030.
The business case for storage will be built around the capacity
market and energy arbitrage, including through a new dedicated
Note: all data refers to the grid-scale segment
platform launched by Terna where storage owners will be able
to sell ‘time-shifting’ of energy to renewable energy owners, plus
ancillary services. Projects will generally be four hours-plus.
All this will be supported by a €17.7 billion (US$19.1 billion)
EU-backed grant support scheme to cover part of the invest-
ment and operating costs for grid-scale storage, approved by
the EU Commission in December 2023.
A whopping 2.6GW/8.9GWh is set to come online in 2024
with an average duration of around 3.4 hours, LCP Delta said.
A big chunk of that is around 1GW that utility and independent
power producer (IPP) Enel is building, much of which it won
long-term capacity market contracts for in 2022.
Deployments will continue at a slower pace thereafter, and by
the end of 2027, 4.8GW/14.7GWh should be online.
Belgium
Germany
Germany was at one time the leading market for grid-scale
BESS in Europe, even ahead of the UK, before the ancillary
service markets which supported that growth were saturated
in 2018.
Starting in 2021 and 2022, ancillary service and energy
trading opportunities have come back, and BESS deploy-
ments have subsequently picked up. ‘Innovation Tender’
grants for co-located projects have also given a boost to the
market.
The government released its Electricity Storage Strategy
in December 2023, aimed at supporting the scale-up and Although Belgium has less BESS online today than larger
integration of energy storage on its grid, putting the technol- neighbours France and Germany, it is notable for having
ogy on the political agenda for the first time. already seen some large-scale, multi-hour-duration deploy-
By the end of 2023, there was 937MW/1,322MWh online in ments.
Germany and another 485MW/681MWh is set to come online Two 25MW/100MWh projects were deployed in the
this year. last few years (by Nippon Koei Energy Europe and Nala
Renewables respectively) and January saw Dutch devel-
Spain oper Giga Storage claim it would start construction on a
The Spanish market has been a challenging one, with anecdo- 600MW/2,400MWh project there, one of the biggest in
tal evidence of ‘over-development’ of solar PV projects and Europe, in 2024.
other challenges perhaps explaining why just 5MW/10MWh A big driver of the multiple hours’ duration and scale of
came online last year. these projects is the country’s capacity market, through the
Deployments are set to pick up, however, with a new energy Capacity Remuneration Mechanism (CRM), which can be
storage deployment target of 22GW by 2030 as part of its stacked with ancillary service opportunities to create a strong
revised NECP (which also includes 76GW of PV by that year). business case.
themselves looking over proposals for a 200MW BESS plant that “You cannot build a battery that is guaranteed to never enter
might, for example, be planned next to a commercial or residen- thermal runaway. Some thermal runaway is going to happen,
tial district. although those incidents are fairly rare. What you can do is
Due to the perhaps unique modular nature of battery storage, engineer a battery that will not explode, that will not spread to
there’s a lot more flexibility in terms of where a facility can be sited other batteries.”
versus traditional power plants, but that sometimes also leads Codes and standards that are now in place that mean even
to what Jeremy Twitchell refers to as “a level of potential conflict in the worst-case scenarios where thermal runaway occurs,
with energy storage that we haven’t necessarily seen with other systems are designed and engineered to limit the failure to just
energy infrastructure”. one unit.
One thing that stands out from the dozens of news reports So again, while local officials shouldn’t have to be experts in
about local opposition to battery storage projects is that the battery fire safety, what they can do, with PNNL’s new paper as
members of communities that speak to the press very often a basis, is ask questions about which codes and standards an
mention that they are in favour of renewable energy and in favour energy storage system is certified to.
of energy storage to enable its growth.
But at the same time, a typical quote will then go on to ask Entering new zones
why the storage system could not be sited somewhere else, A lot of the local authority acceptance issues come back to
where it will not present a potential eyesore or even a fire or just how new grid-connected energy storage is as a concept.
explosion risk. For example, zoning ordinances often don’t have BESS
Developers are not choosing energy storage sites at random, developments as a consideration when it comes to determin-
nor are they choosing sites just because land is available. Mostly, ing whether a storage site can be classified as an industrial
it is about proximity to grid infrastructure, which can dictate how use of land.
strategically useful to the network a BESS asset can be, as well PNNL’s researchers investigated where in the country, and to
as mitigate the need to build out more and more transmission what extent, local zoning ordinances included consideration of
and distribution (T&D) lines, which in themselves can present storage, which Twitchell said was not an easy task given that
development challenges. there are no central repositories of those ordinances to refer-
“If you are close to a substation, you’ve got a lot of lines ence against.
coming out of a substation. If you can tap into that substation, “What we found is that very few municipalities had an
you can provide service and support over a lot of lines, you can ordinance in place. We identified a few different kinds of
support a larger segment of the utility system. If you’re out at the ordinances. The most common version is a municipality had a
end of a particular line, a distribution line or transmission line, you zoning ordinance in place for solar energy and they modified it
don’t have that same level of visibility, you don’t have that same to just say, ‘solar and storage’.”
level of support to the utility system,” Twitchell says. “Obviously storage is a different resource with different
“Substations are like the hubs of the electric grid, and the characteristics and a different risk profile. We also identified a
closer you can be to a hub, the more benefit you can provide, the handful of ordinances that are more proactive [and] provide
better value of the services that you can provide.” specific guidance and regulations around how and where
storage can be built,” Twitchell says.
Elephant in the room However, PNNL was only able to identify “about a dozen
Still, while the technical and economic benefits of certain sites such ordinances around the country”, and many of those were
may be explainable in this way, it might not be enough to elimi- created in response to a specific project proposal, meaning that
nate other concerns. finding municipalities that have proactively addressed the issue
There will always be NIMBYs, who simply do not want anything is rare, although there are some.
built near them or built in a particular area. That is one (possibly Again, asking municipalities to set aside the time and
small) set of people, but frankly, the elephant in the room is safety resources to do that legwork is a big ask, and so PNNL hopes
and the public need to be reassured as well as educated. its report will provide guidance on that. The PNNL energy
Many learnings have been made on safety and incorporated storage team the authors are part of will next be working on a
into industry best practices and standards. Incidents like the follow-up report specifically around “the anatomy of a zoning
2017 fire and explosion at AES’ McMicken BESS project in ordinance,” Twitchell says.
Arizona and the handful of more recent incidents in the US will be “What are the components of it? What are the things that it
thoroughly investigated for their root causes, providing valuable should address? And what are some of the options in terms of
feedback to the industry. how you construct it and some of the requirements? We’ll be
“One of the things we tried to do in the report is point out how drilling down into those topics at a level deeper than we did in
the industry has learned from those incidents, how codes and the latest report.”
standards have evolved to specifically address the safety risks of The report ‘Energy storage in local zoning ordinances’ can
energy storage,” Jeremy Twitchell says. be downloaded from the PNNL website, www.pnnl.gov
“The myriad of trading opportunities available with storage “We are keen to ensure that the
will provide differentiation between competitors and will
provide consumer benefits through innovation. However, this mechanism is applicable for all LDES
will make transparency harder to achieve and increase the
technologies and at the various
potential for operators to exploit the system for financial gain.”
“The ultimate requirement for LDES is driven by the techni- scales needed to support the overall,
cal need for energy security during periods of low renewable
increasingly distributed, energy
energy generation [i.e., as coined in the German language
expression dunkelflaute/‘dark lull’]. Therefore, there should be system”
a mechanism to compel LDES-supported projects to deliver
power during periods of dunkelflaute. Intuitively market signals
should be enough but may not be sufficient under all circum- support mechanisms to initiate the LDES market are needed.
stances.” In principle, we agree with the proposal for the cap and floor
“However, gaming concerns are not unique to the proposed mechanism. We are keen to ensure that the mechanism is
cap and floor model and will exist in any subsidy regime for applicable for all LDES technologies and at the various scales
storage as revenue is dependent on multiple components needed to support the overall, increasingly distributed, energy
within a volatile market.” system. We will be responding to the consultation in due
course.”
LDES technology firms react positively Scott Bolton, executive VP global policy & regulatory affairs
LDES technology firms have generally reacted positively to the for advanced compressed air energy storage (A-CAES)
government proposal. Stephen Crosher, CEO of proprietary technology firm Hydrostor added: “We’re pleased to see
‘high-density’ pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) technol- this proposal from the UK government, which will go a long
ogy firm RheEnergise, said: way to support the decarbonisation of UK electricity markets
“We welcome the commitment to long-duration energy while also adding flexible firming capacity. We look forward to
storage from the UK government and the recognition that reviewing the proposal in further detail.”
ield was founded in 2020 by CEO Amit Gudka, previ- and how can we maximise their usefulness. Across Europe
F ously head of retail utility Bulb which collapsed and was
acquired by Octopus Energy in 2022 (it was the largest utility
it’s definitely an earlier picture,” Wickins says, with the firm’s
experience in Italy so far providing a useful comparison.
in the UK to tumble in the face of soaring natural gas prices).
Field primarily operates in the UK where it has a 20MWh Grid: backlogs, queue management and smart
battery energy storage system (BESS) project online in planning
Oldham, northern England, and several more under construc- As Energy-Storage.news‘ sister site Current has written exten-
tion across the country. It is also targeting Spain, Germany and sively, one of the big challenges in the UK market is long wait
Italy. times to connect projects to the electricity grid. There are more
In this interview, Wickins discusses two important parts of BESS projects being developed and put into the queue than
how the UK market and the approach of transmission system grid connections, network capacity or engineers to integrate
operator (TSO) National Grid are developing: grid interconnec- them, Wickins says.
tion and market mechanisms for energy storage. “This overflowing queue has been born out of a couple of
“There’s lots of appetite in the UK market and the conver- things. It’s been very cheap to apply to connect to the network,
sation has moved on, rightly so, to how we facilitate getting you’ve really had to do nothing in advance of that – the devel-
to our deployment goals as a country. Particularly questions oper approach has been to secure a grid connection then do
around how can we connect all these new assets to the grid everything else,” he says.
“In Italy, it’s different – you can’t apply for a grid connection Wickins says, adding there is good work being done in some
until you have some land secured for your project. That’s more areas and work still to do in others.
onerous and might take you three to six months to secure that One area where Wickins says National Grid is leading the
so it turns the development process the other way around, but world on with BESS is inertia, through its Stability Pathfind-
it slows down the connections being applied for as you won’t ers tender.
get people applying without adequate land.” Other areas need more work. After complaints earlier in
“National Grid is now changing the rules and you’ll need a 2023 about BESS’ treatment in the Balancing Mechanism,
short letter from a landowner saying they are in discussions a revenue stream many hoped would make up for falls in
with you about a project on their land, though we at Field think frequency service prices, Wickins says there is “good visibility
it should go further. Something like a legally binding option of progress” there as well as the introduction of the Open
agreement for the land or at least exclusivity terms having Balancing Platform.
been agreed, for example.” One current problem is that National Grid doesn’t have a
The other aspect of getting projects into the ground more signal telling it the state-of-charge (SOC) of a BESS or how
quickly is around queue management; ensuring projects within long it can be used for, and if this was rectified the TSO
the interconnection queue are assessed based on how likely would be using BESS with a lot more confidence.
they are to be built and not just who joined the queue first.
“There’s been positive movement recently in the direction
of queue management too, in terms of telling projects that “Generally speaking, we’re in a very
aren’t moving forward to get out of the queue and to let those
behind them that are moving forward to come forward. Queue
good position when it comes to
management is really important and we at Field are very providing frequency services. There’s
supportive of what’s been done in the last few years.”
A final aspect of the solution is called ‘construction planning been a big overhaul of that market and
assumptions’, which is about not treating energy storage like it it seems to be working well”
is always exporting when modelling its effect on the grid.
“National Grid is changing these assumptions to treat
batteries in their analysis more in line with how they will Reactive power, which means providing power to help
operate, and that should free up the potential to connect manage voltage, is a market which exists at the transmis-
batteries earlier,” Wickins adds. “These things mean it’s now sion level but not at the distribution level, something Wickins
a totally different picture to if we had had this conversation calls a “missed opportunity” as there are BESS which could
around grid a year ago. Lots of good work has been done provide that service.
over 2023 on this.” A 100MW, transmission-connected project from developer-
National Grid recently appointed global assurance and operator Zenobe Energy claimed to be the first to do this.
risk management provider DNV to assess the potential of A market mechanism for large-scale BESS seen elsewhere
taking out energy projects in the interconnection queue it has that has caught Wickins’ eye is so-called Grid Boosters in
deemed “high-risk”, totalling 29GW. DNV will assess projects Germany, Lithuania and elsewhere. The basic principle of this
and how likely they are to get built, which will involve asking idea is setting up large BESS either side of a high-voltage
developers if they have achieved certain milestones. transmission line to mimic the power flow of the line if it
Wickins says: “It will be interesting to see how that works ever goes down, reducing the need for a second, expensive
in practice. You can imagine National Grid liking the idea that backup line.
someone independent will make the judgement. And if you are “It’s an exciting idea that is not really being talked about in
a developer trying to cling on to your project you’ll argue tooth Great Britain (GB). It’s complicated and there’s some really
and nail that you are nearly there on X, Y and Z. It’s going to detailed power system engineering that’s gone behind it
be a hard job, but DNV is used to doing this sort of thing.” because things happen on a very short timeframe, and what
they are doing in Germany is quite impressive,” Wickins says.
Market mechanisms: frequency, reactive power, BM, “It may be possible that if we had 2.6GW of batteries
inertia and Grid Boosters in Scotland and 2.6GW in England maybe National Grid
The discussion moves on to how market mechanisms need to wouldn’t be turning off 2.6GW of wind today, which is
be further developed in the UK to facilitate the deployment of happening as we speak.
the energy storage the country needs. “These wouldn’t even need to be dedicated BESS but they
“Generally speaking, we’re in a very good position when would need to be the right type of very fast-acting batteries.”
it comes to providing frequency services. There’s been a Wickins adds that he wouldn’t see a contract for difference
big overhaul of that market and it seems to be working well, (CfD), or other cap-and-floor, or feed-in tariff as appropriate
National Grid has driven down prices quite successfully,” market mechanisms for energy storage.
Credit: Fluence.
ing 215GW of solar PV and 145GW of combined offshore and
onshore wind by 2030. The ministry identified 18 separate areas
it considered appropriate for promoting storage deployment.
Those include electricity storage’s role in the context of the
national Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), acceleration Rendering of a 250MW transmission-connected BESS
of network connections, promoting the production of battery supporting the German transmission network, currently
under construction.
cells and system components, identifying obstacles to the
development of pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) and
network charging schemes. trajectory, but not at anything like the levels believed needed.
While the strategy doesn’t yet spell out specific actions, its According to recent analysis from the Fraunhofer Institute
release puts electricity storage on the German political agenda for Solar Energy (Fraunhofer ISE), the installed base of battery
for the first time, said Lars Stephan, senior manager of policy storage close to doubled last year, going from 4.4GW/6.5GWh
and market development for Fluence on LinkedIn. of cumulative installs by the end of 2022 to 7.6GW/11.2GWh
Fluence and four other energy storage-related compa- by the end of 2023. Pumped hydro connected to the grid,
nies active in the German market recently commissioned totalling 6GW, remained unchanged.
a report analysing the projected need for energy storage Frontier Economics said it expects the growth of energy
on the country’s grid. Authored by consultancy Frontier storage in Germany to mirror the success of solar, and it and
Economics, it found that with a supportive policy framework BMWK both pointed out that, unlike the early days of the solar
in place, Germany’s capacity of deployed storage will rise to boom, storage systems are being deployed on an unsubsi-
15GW/57GWh by 2030 and to 60GW/271GW by 2050. dised basis. The market could go much further, the consul-
Frontier Economics also found that those levels of storage tancy said, but with measures including the storage strategy,
deployment could provide around €12 billion (US$13.04 billion) in Germany needs the right framework in place.
economic benefit by the mid-century and lower wholesale electric- Fluence’s general counsel EMEA and managing director
ity prices by, on average, €1/MWh between 2030 and 2050. Markus Mayer said far fewer large-scale storage systems are
“Without the flexibility provided by storage, the country will being built than in other markets such as the UK, US or Australia.
face higher economic costs caused by increasing gas imports There is a “great potential” for increasing the uptake of utility-
and expensive curtailment of renewable generation” Frontier scale storage, but uncertainties in the regulatory and political
Economics director Dr Christopher Gatzen said. space “cause unnecessary delays for our customers and their
Frontier Economics and the companies which funded the projects, for example, during the approval processes or obtain-
study (Fluence, developers Baywa r.e., Kyon Energy, ECO STOR ing network access”, Mayer said.
and optimiser/trader enspired, recommended two main actions “The flexibility provided by storage is fundamental to the
to be taken including a national deployment target for storage success of the energy transition and must become an urgent
and setting aside “corridors” for energy storage facilities. point on the political agenda... The energy storage strategy ...
The German battery storage market is already on an upward gives us hope for positive regulatory changes.”
Roger Hollies, CTO of UK-based Arenko, tells Andy Colthorpe why a frequency event
on Britain’s power network highlights the need for batteries to play a bigger role in
helping stabilise the grid
frequency event that nearly caused major disruption of the 30GW to 35GW of total generation on Great Britain’s grid
A of the electricity grid in Britain could have been more
effectively dealt with had network dispatchers called on more
(GB – the UK would include Northern Ireland, which shares its
grid with the Republic of Ireland).
of the country’s battery storage. The interconnector trip therefore took about 3% of total
That’s the view of Roger Hollies, CTO at UK-based energy power off the network in one go.
storage optimiser and trader Arenko, who spoke to Energy- “This is a reality of the new interconnected grid that we’re
Storage.news about the event in late December 2023 in which operating. With traditional power stations, big loads do not
the operating frequency of the Great Britain (GB) grid dropped tend to drop off instantaneously, whereas interconnectors do.
to 49.2Hz. A big generator will wind down very slowly unless there’s a
Had it dropped any further, the results could have been catastrophic event, but the interconnectors quite often seem
serious, with blackouts and other disruptions to supply as well to trip very large loads off of the system,” Hollies told Energy-
as potential damage to infrastructure. While it isn’t yet clear Storage.news.
exactly what happened in the chain of events, it was precipi- “So, you’ve got this situation where you’ve got high renewa-
tated by a loss of 1GW of load from the IFA Interconnector bles and then a good really big chunk of the system got lost
between the UK and France. instantaneously.”
It came during a couple of days of high renewable genera- The UK has two arms to its electricity network operation.
tion, with a record-breaking 21GW of wind on the system; the One is National Grid, which is the transmission system operator
previous day, there was around 19GW of wind – well over 50% (TSO), physically operating and managing the grid infrastruc-
he Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), enacted in basis to 10% over the course of several years, and standalone
T August 2022, had the potential to flip on its head the
manner in which solar and battery energy storage system
BESS was not eligible for the ITC.
Solar projects and BESS also benefit from bonus depre-
(BESS) projects were developed and financed, in particular ciation. The owner of a project placed in service in 2023
how tax equity financing is utilised in the industry. is permitted to deduct 80% of the cost (after reduction for
Now that we’re over a year removed from the passage of one-half of the ITC) currently, rather than over five to 12 years.
the IRA, it’s a good time to revisit whether some of the predic- Bonus depreciation is set to phase down over the next few
tions, hopes and fears attendant to tax equity financing and years, but it still offers a significant financing enticement.
the IRA have been realised. The ITC has always been something of a double-edged
sword. On the one hand, the ITC has without a doubt been
Double-edged sword the most significant financial incentive for solar energy in the
The investment tax credit (ITC) is a one-time US federal US and has attracted immense amounts of capital investment.
income tax credit based on the cost basis of certain eligible On the other hand, the nature of the ITC as a tax credit has
property, including solar energy systems and BESS. As a excluded many funding sources and introduced potentially
general rule, the ITC is claimed by the owner of the property detrimental artificial incentives to the industry.
for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service. Between the ITC and depreciation, the tax incentives have
Prior to enactment of the IRA, the ITC for solar energy always been too big to ignore. The basic 30% ITC, plus bonus
systems was subject to a phase-down from 30% of eligible depreciation returning almost 20% of project costs as immedi-
ate deductions, means that roughly half of the project value For energy storage, the impacts have been more severe.
lies in tax benefits. Building a project without considering the Pre-IRA, BESS were not eligible for the ITC on a standalone
ITC is not a viable strategy. At the same time, the ITC and the basis. Instead, BESS were eligible for the ITC only if paired
depreciation together create a tax benefit so large that it is with other ITC-eligible electricity-producing property, such as a
essentially impossible for a project to generate enough taxable solar energy system. There were also significant limitations on
income to fully utilise its own tax benefits. how the BESS could be used. To qualify for the full ITC, under
what are known as the dual-use equipment rules, BESS had
Nothing is certain, except taxes to be charged only by the associated solar energy system or
To utilise the ITC, a significant amount of income subject to other ITC eligible property through at least the first five years
US Federal income tax is required, and the claimant gener- after the BESS was placed in service.
ally must be a US taxpayer. Except under unique circum- Any charging from the grid or other ineligible property, and
stances, the ‘US taxpayer’ requirement excludes many the ITC was subject to reduction; and if the total energy input
potential investors and customers: foreign companies, for the BESS from non-ITC eligible property was greater than
government entities, and tax-exempt entities – including 25% then no ITC was permitted with respect to the BESS.
most universities, schools and hospitals. Due to other (more These restrictions made standalone BESS much less attrac-
complex) requirements, individuals are in most cases also tive, and most storage systems installed pre-IRA were part of
excluded from claiming the ITC. hybrid systems – i.e., combined solar and storage projects,
Prior to the IRA, the ITC was not transferable. Depreciation or wind and storage projects. BESS within hybrid systems
is not transferable. As a result, and because project devel- are inherently limited in functionality, and do not utilise the full
opers typically can’t absorb all the tax benefits themselves, potential of the storage technology.
outside financing is generally required to realise the value of The IRA significantly changed this landscape, for both solar
the ITC and depreciation. and storage. The full ITC rate was reinstated to 30%, and
The structures used to monetise the ITC are complex. standalone BESS were added to the list of facilities that are
The most common are partnership flip and sale-leaseback eligible for the ITC, meaning that BESS now no longer need to
structures; some tax equity participants use inverted lease be paired with other ITC-eligible generating property. The IRA
structures, but those are less common. These complex struc- extended the window for ITC eligibility for projects that begin
tures come with high transaction costs. Transaction costs for construction no later than 2033, and possibly longer.
a single tax equity financing frequently exceed a million dollars. The IRA also introduced several ITC adders, such as a 10%
Even for a simplified and streamlined transaction, the total adder for facilities located in certain ‘energy communities’, a
transaction cost will almost certainly exceed US$250,000. 10% adder for facilities that satisfy certain ‘domestic content’
requirements, and a 10-20% adder for wind and solar (and
Solar and storage markets shaped by tax credits associated BESS) facilities located in certain low-income
These requirements combine to create a set of circumstanc- communities, that collectively have the potential to increase
es where there is a fairly small pool of possible ITC investors. the ITC to 70% of the eligible basis of a facility.
In practice, most tax equity investors are banks and insur- In addition to the extension, the IRA added new eligibil-
ance companies. ity requirements. On a going-forward basis, any facility that
This has impacted the shape of the solar energy industry in is over 1MWac must satisfy certain prevailing wage and
the US. Third-party ownership structures are common. Small apprenticeship requirements (although projects on which
commercial projects (less than ~300kW) are very difficult construction began before January 29, 2023, will be exempt
to finance, and therefore are quite rare. Generally speak- from these requirements). These prevailing wage and appren-
ing, larger projects are favoured. Bundled financings are ticeship requirements generally require that in the construc-
favoured – combining multiple projects into single financings. tion, repair or alteration of a facility the taxpayer, contractors,
This effectively requires a developer to have multiple projects and subcontractors must pay wages at local prevailing wage
ready for financing in the same year, which can be difficult for rates published by the US Department of Labor and a certain
smaller developers. percentage threshold of such work must be performed by
Solar has to be structured and financed separately from qualified apprentices.
other assets, even if part of a larger project. This complicates If an otherwise eligible facility is subject to but does not
and discourages including solar as part of general develop- satisfy these prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements,
ments. Most large solar manufacturers are generally unable the credit rate for the facility drops to 6%, rather than 30%.
to own projects, as most are not US companies and do not Further, for projects placed in service beginning in 2025 that
have significant US taxable income. This removes vendor didn’t begin construction before then, a new rule will require
finance as an option for manufacturers to encourage adoption that those projects have an anticipated greenhouse gas
of their products, which in turn makes it more difficult for new emissions rate of not greater than zero.
competitors to enter the US market. The IRA also made solar facilities eligible for the production
to justify a full-on tax equity financing. While smaller projects fore no surprise that we have seen a substantial increase in
may elect to forgo the depreciation benefits (because owners standalone projects in states where standalone storage was
don’t have taxable income to utilise depreciation), this is not already growing (principally California and Texas), but no
a realistic option for larger projects. A similar effect is in place apparent impact in jurisdictions where other obstacles remain.
for tax-exempt entities: the direct pay option only applies to This is where we are, and where we expect we will remain.
the ITC. Depreciation benefits are forever lost if a tax-exempt Some projects are now financeable that were not before the
entity is the tax owner of the project. IRA. Other projects can now choose to forgo outside tax
It is perhaps not surprising that what we are seeing so far equity financing. But the era of complex tax equity financings
is analogous to what happened during the Section 1603 cash is not over. To the contrary, the IRA all but guarantees that tax
grant programme in the wake of the 2008-2009 economic equity financings will continue for at least another decade.
crisis. Then, as now, some small projects took the cash
grant and used what they could of the depreciation without Authors
outside financing. But for larger projects (and larger bundles),
Morten Lund is Of Counsel at Foley & Lardner LLP’s
tax equity financing was still an easy choice. This effect may San Diego office, and a member of the firm’s Energy
become more pronounced as bonus depreciation phases Sector. For more than 25 years, has advised develop-
ers, lenders, investors, and other project participants,
down, but tax equity financing will continue so long as there is
with a particular focus on solar energy and energy
any additional value to be extracted. storage projects.
On the storage side, the story is similar, but for different
Adam Schurle is a Milwaukee-based partner in
reasons. An ITC for energy storage (without solar) removed a Foley’s Tax Practice Group. A significant portion of
major hurdle to widespread adoption of standalone storage his practice is focused on tax advice for developers
and financial institutions in wind, solar, hydroelectric,
projects. Other hurdles remain, however. biomass and other renewable energy finance transac-
There are significant regulatory hurdles to standalone tions. He helps these clients qualify for federal, state,
and local tax incentives and implement transaction
storage in many states, and there are only a few states structures that maximise the value of those incen-
with active markets for energy storage services. It is there- tives.
Sav #StorageSummit
e 20
%o
n all
ticket
s. Use co
de: ESN20
9-10 July 2024
Sands Expo and Convention Centre,
Singapore
There is an additional technology with sodium-sulphur progress will lead to increased performance and capacity of
batteries available. A high-temperature battery, which has the storage systems, all achieved within the confines of the
been commercially available for over ten years and with a same footprint. The potential for improved efficiency and
proven operational track record. I believe this technology performance makes LFP a focal point for innovation and
could be a hidden champion. Not reaching the volume of progress in energy storage.
Li-ion or sodium-ion (Na-ion), but I believe market share will • Sodium-ion batteries as complementary technology:
increase. The spotlight is also shifting toward sodium-ion batteries, as
Recycling will also be a big trend, especially in Europe they are slowly becoming more marketable. As the technol-
where regulations require the circulator of the battery, or the ogy of sodium-ion batteries matures, their integration into
OEM, to take back batteries and recycle them accordingly. the energy storage landscape could offer a compelling
Further, nearly all major battery cell manufacturers are working supplement to existing technologies such as LFP.
on recycling factories, or are partnering with the recycling • Rise of multi-hour storage: The relevance and viabil-
industry, because everyone wants to have their raw materi- ity of multi-hour storage (3, 4, 5 hours) may witness a
als back. We’ll certainly see a circular economy for storage notable increase with complementary technologies. This
developed in the coming years, eliminating recycling issues for synergy has the potential to enhance the dependability and
batteries in the future. economic feasibility of extended-duration energy storage
solutions.
Florian Antwerpen, managing director, Kyon Energy • Price dynamics of lithium-ion batteries: The trajectory of
In the dynamic landscape of energy storage technologies, lithium-ion battery prices is a crucial factor to monitor. As
several key trends are poised to shape the industry’s future. advancements continue and economies of scale come into
From the Kyon perspective, these are some noteworthy devel- play, there is a compelling question of whether the cost of
opments: lithium-ion batteries will continue to decline. A decreasing
• Higher energy density with new LFP battery cells: It price point could render multi-hour storage with lithium-ion
is expected that the energy density of new lithium iron batteries increasingly attractive, opening new possibilities
phosphate battery cells will increase in the future. This and applications.
Save 20% on
all Tickets.
21 – 22 May 2024 Use code:
PVTP20
Sydney, Australia
Enabling
Investment & The Impact of Case Studies A Favourable Technology & Australia’s
Barriers to
Revenue Energy Storage from Across Policy Innovation Transition to
Market Entry
Considerations on the NEM Australia Environment Solutions Renewable
Energy
reyr Battery, a NYSE-listed firm, has taken the drastic “When you have something that costs around US$100
F decision to minimise all further investments in its
flagship Giga Arctic project in Mo I Rana, Norway, as well
per kWh to make (lithium-ion battery cells) and one conti-
nent is giving a US$35 per kWh tax credit to anyone building
as other European projects. Instead, it will only focus on gigafactories, you’ve basically shifted the market. Everyone
scaling in the US for now, where it is developing a gigafac- here has been working to get their head around what it means
tory project in Georgia. Freyr has an ambitious 200GWh but no government in Europe has come up with an adequate
2030 production target across its gigafactory projects in response.”
Europe and the US. “It’s why you are seeing lots of projects migrating to the US
The company’s share price has been falling since July but or Canada; it’s hard to get project-level financing for these in
tumbled some 40% after its Q3 report in which it spelled out Europe. Those pools of capital are global. Why would they do
the decision. It sits at US$1.66 at the time of writing, 90% it in Europe when you can do it in the US for 35% cheaper?
down from a year ago. For now, all our scaling will happen in the US.”
We asked Steen whether, assuming the company went
IRA has “shifted the market” ahead with its European projects as planned, the electric
Put simply, the IRA’s 45x tax credit for battery manufactur- vehicle (EV) and energy storage system (ESS) industry would
ing, which is paid directly, has made it much harder to justify be nonetheless willing to pay a premium for locally made,
investing in Europe’s industry, as Steen explained to Energy- greener battery cells.
Storage.news. He responded, tersely: “If that was the case, why would
the US do the IRA (and its generous tax credit for battery is feasible and will drive the green transition. The question now
manufacturing)?” is can we kickstart this industry.”
On the ground in Norway, the company is close to complet-
ing the commissioning of its customer qualification plant Freyr still “very focused on ESS market”
(CQP), a smaller-scale production facility for customers to test Freyr has always been notable for targeting the stationary
batteries made using the proprietary semi-solid lithium iron ESS market more than other companies building lithium-ion
phosphate (LFP) technology Freyr has licensed from technol- gigafactories and as such has featured more prominently in
ogy company 24M. Energy-Storage.news’ coverage.
Alongside pausing its European investments, Freyr has Interviewing the then-CEO Tom Jensen in March 2022, he
begun “cost rationalisation initiatives” to halve its use of said the company could sell half of its long-term production
cash compared to 2023, including laying off employees and into the ESS market.
contractors especially relating to the Norwegian gigafactories.
It expects to exit 2023 with US$250 million in cash with a
runway of two-plus years. “The PV market provides all the data
and experience you need to understand
“Mutually attractive policy solution needed”
The Giga Arctic gigafactory building next door will be complet- what will happen to batteries and
ed but will remain a shell, ready for a “hot start” but waiting
other green technologies. Is that kind
for a “mutually attractive policy solution” from Norway and
Europe, the company has said. of dependence and exposure in the
The pause in investment in Giga Arctic will “allow for
current geopolitical realities something
continued technology development at the CQP while FREYR
continues to work with stakeholders in Norway and Europe we want? It is the same plot, the same
to establish competitive regulatory framework conditions for
scaling battery manufacturing”.
movie”
When asked what those competitive conditions and policy
solutions would look like, Steen pointed to the example of Recent events do not change its focus on ESS; Steen said:
the EU’s Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework (TCTF), “We’re very focused on the ESS market and building a system
adopted by the bloc in March this year to foster support integration to build containerised BESS products. Given the
measures for sectors key to the energy transition. Energy- softening EV demand and strong ESS demand, this focus has
Storage.news has reported on substantial grant schemes for been a sensible choice. The specifics of the 24M tech also
ESS deployments using it in Slovenia and Hungary. means a C-rate more amenable for ESS.”
Though note that Norway is not in the EU but is closely The firm’s main route into the ESS market is a joint venture
linked through the European Economic Area (EEA). with system integrator Nidec ASI, finalised in December last
“World trade has been seen as a good thing and trade barri- year, whereby Freyr will build cells and modules based on
ers have been seen as a bad thing, and there is a notion in Nidec’s IP which Nidec will use to build the full containerised
Europe that this still needs to be the basic rule. But, the TCTF battery energy storage system (BESS) solution.
provides a loophole within those world trade rules,” Steen
said. Conventional technology partnership with Sunwoda
The firm has also asked for an “IRA-matching” package Some have questioned Freyr’s big bet on 24M’s technology
from the Norwegian government comprising export guaran- platform which has not yet been industrialised at giga-scale.
tees, loans and buybacks worth a total of NOK9.5 billion In June, the company announced it had entered into a
(US$870 million). heads-of-terms agreement with China-based lithium-ion
Steen added that by not matching the IRA, Europe risks battery cell manufacturer Sunwoda (a Benchmark Miner-
remaining totally dependent on China for batteries and its als Intelligence Tier 1 battery firm) to “expand business in
battery industry going the same way as the PV module the western hemisphere based on Sunwoda’s conventional
manufacturing one did. technology”.
“The PV market provides all the data and experience you Steen wouldn’t discuss this in any detail, but the company
need to understand what will happen to batteries and other has said an option is to include a development track as part
green technologies. Is that kind of dependence and exposure of its Giga America project for conventional production line
in the current geopolitical realities something we want? It is the equipment – i.e. building conventional lithium-ion battery cells.
same plot, the same movie,” Steen said. The advantage of building a plant using conventional
“We have lithium in Finland, graphite in Norway. Developing lithium-ion technology is that there is no need to build a pilot
this industry at giga scale from mining all the way to DC blocks plant or CQP.
Credit: Wärtsilä
All battery-based energy storage systems degrade over
time, leading to a loss of capacity. As the energy storage Augmentation will become
increasingly important as battery
industry grows, it’s critical that project developers proactively systems age
plan for this inevitable ‘degradation curve’. Failing to do so will
not only limit potential revenues but could even jeopardise the storage systems lose capacity. This is significant considering
role of energy storage as a key enabler of grid stability and, by nearly 60% of installed energy storage systems were used
extension, the energy transition. for price arbitrage in 2021 — a number that is expected to
As the initial wave of grid-scale energy storage deployments continue to grow.
begins to mature, managing the effects of battery degradation Degradation rates also differ by battery type. There are
will emerge as a key strategy for developers looking to future- several kinds of lithium-ion battery chemistries being used in
proof assets and accelerate renewable energy adoption. Many the energy storage market today, and each comes with its
industry experts suggest that augmentation is poised to be the respective benefits and drawbacks. Nickel manganese cobalt
solution of choice, allowing developers to take advantage of (NMC) had historically been the dominant chemistry for energy
declining battery costs and technological advancements. storage, but this is quickly changing. By 2030, lithium iron
phosphate (LFP) is expected to be the dominant chemistry
Understanding battery degradation — growing from a market share of 10% in 2015 to more than
Battery degradation in energy storage systems is a natural 30% in 2030. The primary benefit of LFP battery technology is
phenomenon. Just like portable electronics wear out to that it enables a longer lifespan compared to other lithium-ion
become less efficient over time — think of how long your old chemistries.
phone can hold a charge — the amount of energy that can be Temperatures, both hot and cold, can have a significant
stored and dispatched from energy storage systems gradu- effect on battery degradation. Higher temperatures may
ally declines. Whereas the average rate of battery degradation increase energy storage system performance in the short
in electronics or electric vehicles is generally predictable, it’s term, but eventually lead to higher degradation rates and a
harder to calculate the decline of energy storage systems with diminished lifespan. Once temperatures surpass 100 degrees
similar accuracy. The rate of degradation and capacity loss is Fahrenheit (approximately 38 degrees C), degradation in
influenced by a variety of factors, including frequency of use, lithium-ion cells quickly accelerates. Prolonged exposure to
operational pattern, battery chemistry, and ambient operating extreme cold can also impact battery performance. When
environments. temperatures drop, internal battery resistance increases,
Energy storage systems that engage in heavy arbitrage are which requires more effort to charge. This, in turn, lowers the
particularly prone to rapid degradation. Arbitrage strategies system’s overall capacity.
involve purchasing and storing energy when prices are low
and selling and discharging it when the demand for energy Managing degradation through oversizing or
increases. Optimal charging and discharging intervals often augmentation
run contrary to preferred arbitrage opportunities, meaning Battery degradation in energy storage systems is
developers have limited visibility into the pace at which energy inevitable. But it can be managed with careful planning and
Credit: Wärtsilä
years, allowing them to maintain the contracted capacity over
the project’s lifetime.
A key advantage of oversizing is that it doesn’t require site
mobilisation, permits, additional labour, or the commission-
The choice of augmentation method depends on the type of
ing of new hardware down the line. By fronting the installation system, its grid connection and the services it provides
process, developers can keep their energy storage systems
operational even as they contend with degradation. There’s no for potential risk and reward. Still, the likelihood of further cost
need for assets to be shut down — either partially or entirely reductions — especially considering the already low price of
— for weeks or longer to perform retrofits. lithium-ion battery technology — makes augmentation particu-
Oversizing also enables developers to lock in capital expen- larly alluring.
ditures at the project outset, mitigating future cost uncertainty
and helping to improve forecasting. As the cost of lithium-ion Choosing between augmentation strategies
batteries continues to fall to new lows, however, developers There are two primary methods of augmentation — alternating
may lose out on significant savings by taking this approach. current augmentation (AC) and direct current (DC) shuffling —
Alternatively, developers may choose to offset degrada- that developers can choose between based on their system
tion by augmenting the capacity periodically throughout the type, grid connection, and needed services.
project’s lifetime. In this case, there must be extra physi- AC augmentation focuses on improving the interplay
cal space with adequate electrical configuration in the initial between the energy storage system and electrical grids,
project layout to add new hardware. Proper planning is critical enhancing system stability, and enabling grid support
to minimise downtime and risks associated with augmenta- functions. With AC augmentation, new physical infrastructure
tion. is added to the project, including inverters and Power Conver-
In 2013, one kilowatt-hour (kWh) of lithium-ion battery sion Systems (PCS), which are responsible for making AC
technology cost more than US$730. Flash forward to 2021 electricity usable in downstream devices like energy storage.
and that price had come down to US$141/kWh — a marked Alongside the PCS, new protective enclosures are installed
reduction of more than 80%. Had a developer opted to to house essential components, including the batteries
oversize their system back in 2013 as opposed to augmenting themselves and associated safety, control, and monitoring
it years later, they would have paid almost twice as much while equipment. The added capacity of AC augmentation can be
missing out on important technological advances that offer installed without requiring significant modifications to exist-
greater efficiency. Of course, battery prices do occasionally ing equipment, minimising disruption. It also offers significant
tick up — like in 2022 as a result of inflationary pressures and system flexibility, allows for incremental sizing, and presents an
supply bottlenecks — but these can be seen as an exception extremely low risk of technical complications.
to a much wider trend. However, there are a few drawbacks associated with AC
Suppliers have since rebounded from 2022’s difficulties augmentation that developers should keep in mind, particularly
and battery prices are once again trending downward. Costs for grid-connected energy storage systems.
are further expected to fall as battery manufacturers ramp Adding new PCS equipment — while relatively straight
up production. By 2030, lithium-ion battery capacity is set to forward from a technical standpoint — requires permitting and
more than double, which will go a long way towards alleviat- regulatory approval when connected to the grid. This process
ing supply shortages. Furthermore, the US National Renew- is cumbersome, time-consuming, and extremely compli-
able Energy Laboratory suggests that the costs of lithium-ion cated, slowing down the ability of developers to augment
energy storage systems could decline by up to 47% by 2030. their systems. These limitations don’t impact energy storage
As prices continue to fall, augmentation is becoming an systems that are independent from the grid, however. Islanded
increasingly attractive way for developers to mitigate battery microgrids can forgo lengthy bureaucratic approvals, making
degradation and capacity loss. It may not be right for every them well-suited for AC augmentation. For grid-connected
situation, though, as each energy storage project is unique energy storage systems, DC shuffling is the more suitable
and different augmentation strategies depend on the appetite augmentation strategy.
DC shuffling prioritises the internal distribution of energy compared to NMC batteries. Improperly integrating these
within battery stacks to ensure balanced charging and technologies can lead to potential repercussions, including
discharging of individual cells and modules, which is vital for voltage imbalances that could trigger thermal runaway. Moreo-
prolonging battery lifespan and maximising overall system ver, developers that incorporate battery modules from different
efficiency. manufacturers run the risk of software incompatibilities, which
Whereas AC augmentation primarily focuses on external could impact monitoring and controlling processes and risk
interactions between energy storage systems and the grid, DC overall system performance and safety.
shuffling optimises energy distribution within battery stacks, To mitigate these issues during augmentation — whether
delivering greater internal efficiency and resiliency. AC or DC shuffling — developers should look to leverage
By reconfiguring battery enclosures from one string of complementary technologies wherever possible. The careful
batteries and transferring them equitably throughout the selection of augmentation equipment and the utilisation of
system, DC shuffling leads to a more balanced distribution of advanced software solutions can help ensure the successful
energy across the battery stack. and safe augmentation of energy storage systems.
A new string of enclosures is then introduced behind the
PCS from which the existing batteries were shuffled. This Battery degradation management will remain
addition guarantees that the overall system retains its power important into the future
capacity and that the number of PCS units and the nominal The energy storage landscape may be dominated by lithium-
power of the plant remain unchanged. This allows DC shuffling ion battery technology today, but that could very well change
augmentation to bypass permitting and regulatory approval, in the future. There are a range of emerging technologies
as there are technically no new connections being made to the including sodium-ion (Na-ion), hydrogen, and long-duration
grid. energy storage (LDES) that have significant potential.
DC shuffling also benefits from lower equipment costs Na-ion batteries, for instance, offer a reduced environ-
relative to AC augmentation, as there’s greater repurposing of mental impact and safety benefits relative to lithium. Hydro-
infrastructure. DC shuffling is well suited for grid-connected gen, lauded for its high energy density and versatility, also
ESS, though it may not always be possible due to technical holds great promise as a clean and flexible storage solution.
limitations, from auxiliary load breaker and busbar limita- Meanwhile, LDES technologies offer extended discharge
tions to short circuit ratings. Consequently, developers must periods, addressing the need for sustained power during
diligently evaluate the specific technical and operational prolonged lulls in renewable energy production.
aspects of their systems before deciding whether to invest in These technologies, while promising, have not yet been
AC or DC augmentation. deployed at scale. They will have to prove themselves individu-
ally at the grid level before developers have enough faith
Bringing it all together in being able to use them for augmentation. But as these
There may not be a standardised rate of battery degradation in up-and-coming storage technologies mature, they have the
energy storage systems, but software can provide invaluable potential to reshape the augmentation landscape, provid-
insights, helping inform augmentation decisions. Sophisticated ing developers with an array of options that can enhance the
energy management programs, such as ES&O’s GEMS Digital resiliency, efficiency, and sustainability of their energy storage
Energy Platform, can gather operational data over a period to systems.
inform recommendations on capacity enhancements that can With hundreds of gigawatts worth of battery-based energy
result in significant monetary gains. storage systems operating at a global scale, mitigating capac-
Energy management software is not only useful for making ity losses will become a central part of managing projects
data-driven decisions, but it’s also key to seamlessly and cost- for developers and integrators in the years to come. Careful
effectively implementing augmentation strategies. Software battery degradation management practices including augmen-
optimises the dispatch of augmented energy storage systems tation will enable developers to drive greater performance,
and harmoniously integrates the new and existing equipment. lower lifetime costs, and keep the renewable energy transition
Energy management software must be flexible and power- moving forward.
ful enough to incorporate disparate battery technologies and
capacity levels. In cases where new equipment differs signifi-
cantly, a software system’s ability to coordinate and control Author
these diverse technologies is indispensable.
Developers must also consider the importance of comple- Giriraj Rathore, in his role as the business strategy
manager at Wärtsilä Energy, harnesses a blend of
mentary augmentation technology. Augmenting with batteries technical expertise and strategic acumen to drive
of different capacities can introduce significant complexities innovation in energy storage solutions. His educa-
tional background includes a bachelor’s degree in
that need to be handled with the utmost care. LFP batteries, mechanical engineering, complemented by an MBA
for instance, require different thermal management strategies specialising in international business.
York City. As New York utilities move toward meeting regula- The tonnage that can be feasibly transported to land-
constrained sites is one consideration to make
tory mandates for reduced or zero-carbon emissions, thermal
generation systems are being ramped down or retired. Renew-
risk of thermal runaway propagation. However, this chemistry to provide many gigawatts of round-the-clock baseload power
can pose another set of risks. leave the market, use cases for long-duration storage will
Due to lower heat values lower and lack of flame during increasingly come to the forefront. Though market dynamics
a thermal runaway event, LFP chemistry can create more currently favour lithium-ion BESS facilities, that could change if
explosive gases that can raise the risk of explosions for these these facilities were needed to provide round-the-clock power
batteries located in contained spaces. output.
Fire suppression systems for all lithium-based technologies
currently aim primarily to protect the building and related enclo- No project is identical
sures. There is no silver bullet for stopping thermal runaway Energy density has become a priority for both operational
within the lithium-ion technology group, simply because it is a and financial reasons, but to date, most of the advances have
chemical reaction that is hard to stop once it begins. come primarily from the batteries and secondarily from space
Effective thermal management programmes may utilise optimisation within enclosures, along with creative enclosure
HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) or chiller configurations.
systems that aid in maintaining operational stability while lower- Energy density has become a priority for battery OEMs to
ing the risk profile for batteries to go into thermal runaway due help reduce total project cost and fit more capacity within
to thermal abuse. For example, direct expansion air handling small footprints. However, as the grid continues to change
units using refrigerant liquid are an option. Though these and the market shifts to deeper decarbonisation, it is unclear
are reasonably cost-effective to install, it must be noted that whether energy storage technologies will advance enough to
efficiency decreases over time. Central utility plant designs meet the demand for baseload power. Ultimately, money is the
incorporating large centrifugal chillers are another option that driver within any market, and with the reduction of capital it
can be used to distribute cooled water across large interior may be that planners and policymakers begin to conclude that
spaces. This proven technology offers the potential for redun- it is imperative to adjust policy or regulatory drivers to keep
dancy and greater operational flexibility. Placement of racks pace with continued increases in capital cost or to provide
in vertical configurations can add another element of thermal further incentives to advance the development of lithium-ion
management by creating different heat zones and hot and cool technologies and other technologies.
aisles. One possible sign to indicate the technology advancement
for the energy storage market is shifting is the development
Other battery chemistry options of battery cell types geared specifically to meet the needs
Though there are a number of non-lithium technologies in of the power industry. The energy storage market previously
development, none to date can compare to the energy densi- used battery cells generally designed for the EV market and
ties, better efficiencies and lower capital cost of lithium-ion not necessarily designed with a use case for the storage
batteries. market. By optimising the cell design for storage applications,
Several non-lithium battery technologies are proven but are improvements in degradation and cycle life (i.e., life of the
unlikely to unseat the dominance of lithium-ion anytime soon. battery) can be achieved. Some manufacturers are starting to
Unless a technology emerges with the scale and economic offer a 25-year performance guarantee (one cycle per day) for
viability to support a robust supply chain, we are unlikely to see certain battery types.
another dominant technology emerge in the utility-scale energy As more fossil-based thermal generation exits the market,
storage market in the near term. that capacity must be replaced by other sources along,
If it weren’t for the demand for batteries generated by energy storage playing a key role. As these energy storage
the automotive industry, it’s difficult to predict what type of systems are moving into more urban areas, energy density
storage technology would be emerging to meet the chang- and land availability will be topics of great interest for the
ing demands of the power industry. The known alternatives foreseeable future.
currently provide only a fraction of the energy density available
from the primary lithium-ion battery technologies. The round- Authors
trip efficiencies — defined as the percentage of electricity put
Josh Tucker is engineering manager for the Energy
into storage that is later retrieved (i.e., the higher the round-trip
Storage Department at Burns & McDonnell. He is
efficiency, the less energy is lost in the storage process) — are responsible for all engineering for the energy storage
not as high with alternative battery and other storage technol- business.
ogies at present.
Flow battery technologies, for example, offer certain advan-
Ben Echeverria, energy storage regulations and
tages such as longer output duration and longer cycle life, but compliance at Burns & McDonnell, is responsible for
are hampered by lower round-trip efficiencies. assisting the EPC project teams on energy storage
projects globally, focusing on the safety, regula-
The market dynamics will change as more thermal power tion and overall compliance of the interconnected
plants are retired. As dispatchable power units with capacity systems.
Project overview:
• Battery energy storage system (BESS) project in
Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy, designed by Benny Energia
• Power installed: 200MW
• Energy capacity: 800MWh
• Charge and discharge hours: four hours
Credit: FlexGen.
at some point”. Brandt gave an interview following a FlexGen
announcement a couple of months ago that the system integrator A BESS project
had carried out a number of upgrades to customer battery energy integrated by FlexGen
storage system (BESS) assets in the ERCOT, Texas, market.
In addition to providing commissioning, engineering and of FlexGen’s rival system integrators – on the need for BESS asset
procurement services for utility-scale BESS, FlexGen also operators to respond to changing energy market rules. It examined
onboards projects with its energy management system (EMS) and how Fluence’s Mosaic automated bidding platform was used to
digital controls platform, Hybrid OS. adapt the market participation of a 720MWh BESS in Califor-
Over in ERCOT, FlexGen carried out upgrades to Hybrid OS for nia’s CAISO market to changes in market rules. Fluence product
its customers’ sites to meet changing power market regulations as manager Drew Skau explained how the BESS’ owner, utility PG&E,
well as new utility standards. The company claimed that through was able to optimise the battery’s performance and revenue
field experience and application of R&D work at its new laboratory potential in the face of those changes.
and compliance centre facilities, it has managed to reduce the time
required for such upgrades by about 75%. Creating new value with upgrades
That matters, Brandt said, because whether asset owners and One interesting difference between CAISO and ERCOT is that
investors are aware of it or not, their BESS project too will be in line CAISO expects to manage state of charge in batteries connected
for the upgrade treatment, sooner or later. to its grid, while ERCOT does not, although state-of-charge
“The reality is: energy storage projects are going to be upgraded monitoring has been proposed in ERCOT recently.
many times over their lives, no matter which ISO you’re in because FlexGen’s EMS is capable of providing good state-of-charge
regulators are going to change the way that batteries have to data, Yann Brandt said, due to in-built data analytics capabilities.
operate in the grid, power markets are going to change, revenue That’s an advantage in markets like CAISO where that’s a necessity
opportunities are going to adapt, and some projects are going to of market participation and has a multitude of other purposes.
enter into different financial relationships, whether it’s corporate “Having an analytic system embedded into an EMS allows you to
PPAs, or some other hedges or tolls,” Brandt said. be able to make real-time decisions based on what you’re seeing
In this particular case, it was that grid and wholesale electricity from the asset, versus what should have happened with the asset
market operator ERCOT implemented some new ancillary services against the theoretical, digital mirror image of that site,” Brandt said.
products, Fast-Frequency Response (FFA) Advancement and The energy storage market is still at its early stages, but is
ERCOT Contingency Reserve Service (ECRS). already “roaring”, because the fundamental need for energy
To keep up with revenue opportunities, BESS assets need to storage is converging with the market reality that money can be
remain in compliance with the codes and parameters governing made from it, the FlexGen CCO said. In all of that excitement,
those opportunities. That necessitates upgrades, and in some of asset owners perhaps don’t think too much about what happens
the more fast-acting markets, those will be more frequent. “It’s just a little way into the lifetime of a project, and perhaps aren’t aware
a fundamental necessity that you need to update your systems,” that there may come a time when they want to, say, swap out an
Brandt said. EMS or change which optimiser takes their asset into the markets.
“Hopefully by telling this story, people will at least think about
BESS market adaptation the reality of: ‘What will I do when I need to do upgrades due to
There will be lots of different reasons for upgrading. In December compliance?’ That’s definitely something we want more people to
2023, Energy-Storage.news hosted a webinar with Fluence – one think about when they’re building sites.”
irtual power plants (VPPs) have existed since the electricity networks built around large-scale power plants.
V latter part of the 20th century, as a form of demand
response technology. Large energy users at industrial or
Customer-sited DERs, like rooftop solar PV, electric vehicle
(EV) chargers, heat pumps and, of course, battery storage
commercial sites have been incentivised to turn down their systems, all have a role to play in today’s virtual power
electricity use at the request of utilities or grid opera- plants.
tors during peaks, while in some cases, the use of other However, the potential use of VPPs as a grid flexibil-
energy-intensive equipment like water heaters has been ity resource is largely untapped. That led the DOE’s Loan
managed to help mitigate peak demand. Programs Office (LPO) to identify VPPs as a technology area
However, how we look at the term has changed radically that, like long-duration energy storage (LDES), green hydro-
in the past 10 years or so, as it has come to encompass gen and other emerging low-carbon resources, could use
different models of aggregated distributed energy resources some help in educating the market.
(DER), pooling their capabilities to provide grid services or A September report in the DOE’s ‘Pathways to commer-
energy capacity. cial liftoff’ series for emerging climate tech highlighted the
In this way, VPPs can disrupt the centralised model of potential of VPPs, as well as the challenges ahead. Report
author and LPO senior advisor Jennifer Downing told Energy- versus utility-scale, you’re ignoring the fact that Americans
Storage.news a while back that battery storage is perhaps are buying these resources for a different reason in most
the most versatile resource available to VPP operators. cases than doing grid services.
What follows is our conversation with Downing, where People are buying electric vehicles because it’s a superior
we explore some other areas of the LPO’s research into the car, or they’re buying a smart electric water heater because
technology and the associated business models. it’s going to save them overall on their energy bill, or it’s
going to decarbonise their home, and a lot of folks are
A variety of factors have been holding VPP technologies buying behind-the-meter batteries for backup power.
back from widespread adoption. What were some of the So, the cost to the customer is justified by the primary
reasons why the DOE identified this as an area to write function of the DER. Then, we’re taking the fraction of the
about in the ‘Pathways to commercial liftoff’ series of capacity that is flexible and using that for grid services.
reports? That’s where you get the cost-effectiveness. You have to
From a high-level view, we are experiencing an increase in split the total cost of a distributed storage system versus
demand at a pace and magnitude that we have not seen in when you are comparing it to the cost of a utility-scale
decades, and that is thanks to the electrification of vehicles, resource.
industry, heating, and data centres… it’s really increasing the If you’re just looking at storage, if those behind-the-meter
peak demand on the grid that we need to solve. batteries were not used for that homeowner’s backup power
We think about this at the Department of Energy as really at all, then maybe yes, you then add up the cost of every
needing three pillars of investment. Powerwall and compare that to the cost of a utility-scale
One is more generation, two is grid-enhancing technolo- battery, and that’s a relevant comparison. But people are
gies that increase the capacity of the lines to deliver the buying these Powerwalls for their own backup power so
electrons, and three: demand flexibility or virtual power plants it’s unfair to count the whole cost of the behind-the-meter
that allow us to flex demand with the same level of dexterity battery and compare that to a utility-scale battery.
as, traditionally, we’ve only used to flex supply.
That is why we wanted to shine a light on virtual power Behind-the-meter resources can have a ‘double
plants because they are so critical in meeting demand needs source of value’
on the timescale that we need to electrify. If you look across So what we’re talking about there is recruiting people
those three pillars, VPPs can be among the fastest solutions. that would have installed DERs anyway. But I’m wonder-
If you have a customer-sited resource, you are not waiting ing how closely the need for VPPs will correlate with
in transmission interconnection queues for three, four or five areas where people might already be buying battery
years. If you look at the timeline to build a small modular systems, and conversely, we’ve seen virtual power plant
reactor, it’s a lot longer than ramping up your capacity via programmes and pilots where customers in constrained
solar and storage systems on commercial rooftops, for load pockets are encouraged to buy battery systems
example. that enrol into VPPs. Will scaling up VPPs be possible
We’re going to need ‘all of the above’, but we wanted to by enrolling customers who would have bought batteries
make sure that people weren’t discounting demand flexibility anyway, or will it also require incentivising new custom-
as we think about serving higher load. And really, it’s about ers as well?
using the infrastructure that we have more efficiently. The short answer to your question is that it will require both
types of customers. A really good example is Swell Energy’s
I’ve heard people comment that you could build a single- battery VPP in Hawaii, where they recruited people who had
site battery storage project that’s perhaps 100MW, and batteries already and offered them monthly payments plus an
that could be somewhere between one-hour to four- export credit for the use of their batteries. They also expand-
hour duration. Whereas to build that same amount of ed the capacity of the VPP by going to households and small
battery storage across residential or even commercial businesses that didn’t have a battery before and offered
VPPs takes a lot of individually sited systems. I guess them somewhere between a couple of hundred dollars and
their argument is that building large-scale is effectively US$1,000 per kilowatt of flexible capacity. The provider is
cheaper than aggregating behind-the-meter systems, but always preserving 20% to 50% [of the stored energy], maybe
what’s your take on that view? depending on your needs, for your backup power.
It’s a couple of things. One is that customer-sited resources They recognise that that flexible capacity is valuable for
don’t require the same kind of land and construction. I also the grid, and that’s why they’re offering that signup bonus
mentioned the need for speed, and if you have distributed payment. You see that, too, with Green Mountain Power,
energy resources on the distribution grid, you don’t face the where they are offering these batteries at a low cost to the
same kind of transmission interconnection hurdles. homeowner, and, again, the homeowner is willing to pay that
Then also when you’re looking at the cost of distributed because they’re getting backup power.
services remain. decide the extent to which they bid into ancillary services, the day
In this piece we interview Habitat Energy, one of the most ahead energy market, or save capacity to capture real-time volatil-
well-known optimisers, Enertel AI, which provides AI-modelled ity,” says Enertel cofounder David Murray.
price forecasting but not optimisation, as well as independent Firms can either simply provide price forecasts to enable
sources in the wider market. in-house decision-making, like Enertel, or go one step further and
The past possibility of successfully monetising a BESS by offer to take over management of the BESS, as Habitat does,
having it simply sit in one or two different ancillary service while sometimes each part may be offered by a different third
markets is fast disappearing, with those markets’ saturation party. No model is without its challenges.
forcing a rapid diversification of the revenue stack. That diver-
sification requires a more sophisticated trading strategy, most Optimisation firms’ lack of transparency
likely with the help of AI-based forecasting, which is where BESS The first, which Energy-Storage.news has written about exten-
optimisation firms’ value proposition comes in. sively, is optimisers’ lack of transparency into the AI algorithms that
“Energy price forecasts, especially with confidence intervals, forecast the prices underpinning trading decisions, and even the
will increasingly be used as inputs for batteries as they must forecasts themselves, which typically won’t be provided either.
This is, according to some, because of a fear that providing Preference for in-house control of assets
the pricing forecasts to customers will allow those customers It’s fairly obvious that if you can make the same returns on
to reverse-engineer the optimisers’ algorithms – their ‘secret your BESS asset, you would prefer to keep the management
sauce’ – and steal their competitive advantage. of it in-house.
The lack of transparency might be fine for some develop- Larger asset owners won’t want an automated solution
ers who are happy for “results to speak for themselves”, as because of over-reliance on a software provider when they
one optimiser Gridmatic put it to Energy-Storage.news a few have GW+ of capacity and will want to retain agency over
months ago, but won’t be for others. optimisation decisions, Enertel’s cofounder David Murray
Habitat Energy cofounder and director Ben Irons says claims.
the company takes a similar approach to managing BESS However, Irons says that even as asset owners get larger
projects: “With our model, you give us the keys, and we’ll and more familiar with BESS, there will still be plenty of value
generate the revenue. Transparency isn’t as much of an issue for third-party firms to add. It takes around 2GW of operational
as long as the revenue comes in. The project owners don’t capacity before the in-house model gets even remotely cost-
necessarily need reporting on a day-by-day basis since they competitive and even that is with some significant caveats,
are not the ones pushing the buttons.” Irons says.
There obviously need to be conversations with the asset “If you’re a battery owner or developer, your skills are in
owner on their specific requirements around BESS’ lifetime raising money, procurement and EPC. Do you really want to
warranty, and any physical constraints that might bring, as well have to go and hire data scientists and compete with Silicon
as their risk-return appetite, he says.
“But once the asset goes live, we give regular performance
updates, but we resist letting them get involved in trading “There’s no code to crack. Everyone’s
because that’s a responsibility they’ve assigned to us.”
Irons says that it’s actually when you separate the forecast-
trying to make as much money as
ing and optimisation pieces to separate third parties that possible by sticking their battery in
the lack of transparency becomes a big issue, which is why
Habitat only offers the wrapped service and not just forecast- whatever revenue stream makes the
ing alone. most sense on a given day. That’s not
“If you’ve got one company sending a stream of instruc-
tions saying you should discharge at 4pm, and the other a secret”
company which is receiving those instructions and respon-
sible for pushing the buttons thinks it should be at 5pm,
you can see why tension arises. The trader will call up the Valley by creating a tech team within your asset ownership
forecaster and ask for some transparency behind the recom- company? You’d need to be very committed and confident to
mendation, and the forecaster will say, ‘that’s our suggestion, do that.”
take it or leave it’.” He also points out that many large asset owners, like UK
Habitat’s own forecasting and trading desks work very energy storage fund Gresham House, use many different
closely with each other to this end, Irons says. optimisers in order to see how each is performing.