Nusayrilieve Nusayrideolojisine Genel Bir Bak Suriyernei
Nusayrilieve Nusayrideolojisine Genel Bir Bak Suriyernei
net/publication/340607141
CITATIONS READS
0 3,268
2 authors, including:
Mehmet Biçici
Gaziantep University
26 PUBLICATIONS 20 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Mehmet Biçici on 13 April 2020.
ÖZ
Ortadoğu etnik, kültürel, dini çeĢitliliği çok olan bir yapıya sahiptir. Bu yapının unsurlarından biride kendine özgü
kapalı bir grup olan Nusayrilerdir. Suriye Devlet yönetimindeki Esad ailesi ve Suriye‟de gerçekleĢen iç savaĢ nedeniyle
gerek medyada gerekse akademik makalelerde Nusayri ismi sık sık zikredilmektedir. Peki, kimdir Nusayriler? Suriye
devlet yapılanmasında ilerlemelerinin inançlarıyla bağlantısı var mıdır? Nusayrilik inancı tarihsel süreç içerisinde bir
ideolojiye dönüĢmüĢ müdür ya da çıkıĢı itibariyle zaten ideolojik bir yapıda mıdır? ġüphesiz ki bu sorulara cevap
verebilmek için gerek dinsel, gerekse kültürel olarak Nusayrilerin tarihi ve antropolojik geliĢimini incelememiz
gerekmektedir. Bu çalıĢmada sırasıyla önce Nusayriliğin ilk oluĢumunu, inanç sistemlerini, kültürlerini, yerleĢim
yerlerinin dağılımını ve tarih içinde nasıl değiĢim gösterdiklerini anlamaya çalıĢtık. Kapalı bir toplum olan Nusayrilerin
siyasi anlamda ilerlemelerinin dini inançlarıyla olan bağlantısını, inançlarının siyasal bir ideolojiye dönüĢüp
dönüĢmediğini ve ideolojik karakterde olan bir inancın kendini nasıl yansıttığı konularını değerlendirdik.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Nusayrilik, Ġdeoloji, Ġnanç, Suriye,
1
Bu çalıĢma, Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Güvenlik Stratejileri Bölümü, Orta doğuda Nusayrilik ve Nusayri
ideolojisi isimli Yüksek Lisans tezinden üretilmiĢtir.
Social Sciences Studies Journal (SSSJournal) 2019 Vol:5 Issue:33 pp:2119-2131
1. INTRODUCTION
During the period of their emergence, the Nusayris were known as Namiris, Nusayris, or Ansaris; but since
the 1920s, they have been known as Arab Alawis. In Turkey, they are colloquially referred to as “Fellah”
(farmhand), and as “Arap uĢağı” (Arab folk) to emphasize their ethnic origins (Üzüm.2000:s.173,174). As
a result of their Islamic interpretations and beliefs, which are not accepted by other sects including Shia
Islam itself, of which they are a sub-sect, the Nusayris are known as a batini (esoteric) sect of the Shia sect.
A closed community with distinctive characteristics, secrecy is essential in the rituals of Nusayris. While
their attitude within the sect is shaped by ta‟wil, the principle of taqiyya shapes their attitude in their
dealings with people outside their sect. Ta’wil refers to the symbolic or allegorical interpretation of holy
texts and religious practices, while taqiyya refers to the dissimulation of religious belief or sect in the face
of possible danger (Türk,2013:pp. 31,85). The Nusayris have managed to survive in this manner under the
administration of numerous states. Even though there has been much scientific research about the Nusayris,
who have been acting on these principles, there is still a lot of mystery surrounding their community.
In the present study, we will first offer an overview of the events that led to the division of Islam into sects
and the emergence of Shia Islam, the origin of Nusayriyya; then we will discuss the divisions within the
Shia sect into further sub-sects and offer insights into some of these sub-sects. We will consider claims
regarding the origin of the name Nusayri and the ethnicity of the Nusayris, then we will explore the
religious, political, sociological and cultural changes the Nusayris have gone through since their emergence
until the present, as well as the causes of these changes. We will provide a short account of the states under
whose rule the Nusayris lived from their emergence until the foundation of the Syrian State. We will offer
information about the core beliefs of the Nusayris which have led to their identification as a batini
(esoteric) sect: Belief in Ali (hulul) and metempsychosis (tanasukh). In this study, we have also assessed
the role of the Nusayris in the creation and political history of the Syrian State. We have briefly mentioned
the formation of the Baath Party and the Nusayri activities within the party. As a conclusion, we have tried
to define the concepts of ideology and religion, and, based on the information revealed in this study, shared
our findings as to whether or not the Nusayri sect has ideologically-shaped political sides.
2. METHODOLOGY
Published theses, articles, national and international books, magazines and opinion pieces on the Nusayri
faith have been used in this study. Case study research has been conducted in the form of interviews with
members of the Nusayri sect who asked to remain anonymous. Comparative research methods have been
adopted to evaluate the information gathered from these individuals and from written sources on the
Nusayri faith.
3. THE NUSAYRI FAITH AND THE HISTORY OF NUSAYRIS
3.1. The Division of Islam into Sects
Islam is a religion that was received by Muhammad (570-632) of the Banu Hashim Clan through divine
revelation in the 7th century. Islam spread over a large area within a short span of time, and united those
who believed in this religion within a single structure. However, after the death of the Islamic prophet
Muhammad, disagreements arose about who would succeed him as the religious and political authority.
The political events that resulted from this power struggle generally developed along two axes: the related
Banu Hashim and Banu Umayya. As a result, madhabs (sects/schools of Islamic jurisprudence), literally
meaning paths to follow, emerged. Islam is divided into three main sects: Sunnites, Shiites and Kharijites.
Islamic scholars assert that the emergence of these sects was caused by the events of Saqifah and Karbala
(Topaloğlu, 2001:pp. 2-10). In the course of history, numerous sub-sects with various names emerged out
of these main sects. Among the reasons for these sub-divisions are the political turmoil of the period, the
conquests that led to the spread of Islam over a large area, the Islamization of the peoples inhabiting these
conquered lands and the emergence of distinct political views from the synthesis between Islam and the
cultures of these peoples, their interpretations of Islam based on these views, and the struggle for power
that took place in the Islamic context. From the Sunni branch emerged the four schools of fiqh (Islamic
jurisprudence): Hanafi, Hanbali, Shafi‟i, Maliki. The most well-known school to have emerged from the
Khariji branch and survived until the present is the Ibadiyya. The Ja‟fari School is the main school of
jurisprudence to have emerged from Shia Islam. Deriving its name from Imam Ja‟far al-Sadiq, the Ja‟fari
School is also known as “Twelvers”. Zaidiyyah, also known as “Fivers,”ranks the second. They derive
their name from Zayd ibn Ali, whose imamate they support in place of his brother Muhammad al-Baqir,
son of Zayn al-Abidin and the fifth imam. Another branch that emerged from Shia Islam is Isma‟ilism, also
sssjournal.com Social Sciences Studies Journal (SSSJournal) [email protected]
2120
Social Sciences Studies Journal (SSSJournal) 2019 Vol:5 Issue:33 pp:2119-2131
known as “Seveners”. They accept Ja'far al-Sadiq‟s older son Isma'il ibn Jafar al-Mubarak as the appointed
seventh imam, and they are one of the Ghulat sects born out of Shia Islam. Ghulat is a term that means
exceeders. Among the core beliefs of Ghulat sects is hulul (manifestation). Tanāsukh (metempsychosis)
and ibaha are also among their core beliefs (Çağatay et al. Çubukçu, 1985:pp. 65-68).
3.2. Origin of the Name “Nusayri”
It is necessary to first dwell on the origin of the name “Nusayri” in order to have an idea about the period
when the Nusayris emerged, the area they inhabited and the figures or places from where their beliefs
developed. There are many different accounts regarding the emergence of the name “Nusayri”. Among the
most significant are the claims that the name was derived from “Nasrani” (Christian) which was taken from
the name of a village called “Nasuraya” in Kufa, Iraq, which was named after an imaginary Shiite martyr
(Uluçay, 2003:p. 4). Melikoff asserts that the name “Nusayri” is a traditional one, and that, inspired by the
Alevis of Anatolia, the Nusayris were called “Alawites” (Melikof, 1994:pp. 26-34). Al-Tawil argues that
the name was derived from “Nusayra,” which is the diminutive of the word for “help”. When the troops
sent by Caliph Umar to conquer Syria faced difficulties and asked for help, an army of 450 people from
Ansar came to their assistance. This small army that came to help is known as “Nusayra,” meaning small
help. The code of war of the period required that the conquered lands would be given to the conquering
army. The lands conquered by the Nusayra group were called Nusayra. (Al-Tawil, 2000:p. 81) Hasan ReĢit
Tankut claims that the name “Nusayri” referred to a group of people who believed in a religion much older
than Abrahamic religions, but that its followers failed to preserve the original characteristics of this Nusayri
faith (Tankut, 1938:p. 25). The most probable one of all these claims is that the name is derived from the
name of Muhammad ibn Nuṣayr al-Namiri, the founder of the sect.
3.3. Ethnic Origins of the Nusayris
Ethnicity is a concept that defines the identities of communities of a common origin who develop a culture,
worldview and lifestyle based on their acceptance of a shared origin. At the same time, it characterizes a
community and helps us understand its social and physical characteristics. Ethnicity is one of the core
elements that brings a community together. Then what is the ethnic identity that characterizes the Nusayri
community? The Nusayri faith emerged in the Iraqi city of Kufa, populated densely by Arabs. In the course
of history, due to changing dynamics, groups belonging to the Nusayri sect migrated to different areas from
their place of origin. These migrations resulted in their concentration in the area around the Nusayri
mountains. The Arab Nusayris who settled in this area influenced the other ethnicities inhabiting the
vicinity of the area. Al-Tawil argues that this situation results from the inflated sense of individualism, and
the quick-tempered nature of Arabs who assimilated and Arabized numerous peoples thanks to their
attachment to their language and to the customs of their people. In addition to Arab Nusayris, another
populous ethnic group which settled in Syria and around the Nusayri mountains is the Turks. It is highly
likely that the Nusayris had contacts with the Turks in this region where they settled and, due to the Arabic
temperament which has been mentioned, Arabized and absorbed these ethnic groups. Al-Tawil‟s claim that
the ancestors of the Nusayris are Ghassanids, Tanukhids, Phoenicians, Qahtanites, Mekharizas, Mudharis,
Banu Rabiah of Adnamids, Circassians, and a branch of Turks, verifies this account. Another important
aspect to consider here is the expansionist character of the Nusayri order at its emergence. During the
period from its emergence until its conversion into a closed society, people or groups of other faiths and
ethnicities would first be called to Islam and Shiism, then the ones who were found fitting would be
admitted into the order (Al-Tavil, 2000:p. 274).
One of the essential goals of anthropology is to define the changes undergone by ethnic groups through
religious, linguistic and geographical factors. It is for this reason that the physical and cultural interaction
between the Nusayris and Turkmens has been studied by numerous Anthropologists in an effort to gain
insight into the ethnic origin of the Nusayris. In his work “Völker, Ressen, Sprachen,” German
anthropologist Felix Von Luschan finds similarities between the two ethnicities and emphasizes the
possibility of a Turkish origin.
“... their [the Nusayris’] serious and calm attitude, and their somatologic attributes
resemble completely the Takhtadjis of Lycia (the Lycian Hinterland). (The Takhtadjis
are Turkmen Alevis). The Sunnis use the name “Alevi” to refer to both sides. I have
measured their cephalic indexes and the average is 85 (Luschan, p. 204-cited by
Tankut, 1938:p. 11).”
Hasan ReĢit Tankut, a professor of Turkology, claims in his book Nusayrilik ve Nusayriler Hakkında (On
the Nusayri Faith and Nusayris) that their origin goes back to Turks. Tankut defines the average cephalic
index of 85 as the ideal measurement for a Turkmen. He asserts that, since Arabs have a cephalic index of
72-75, especially the Nusayris living in Anatolia cannot be Arabs from an anthropological perspective.
According to Tankut, because Nusayris are a closed group and do not intermarry, their cephalic index has
not fallen under 85 and they have preserved their ethnic characteristics (see. Table. 1)
Table 1: Cephalic Indexes (Tankut,1938:pp. 11-12)
Elisef Generally Turkish 84.40
Von Luschan Western Turk 81
Von Luschan Takhtadji-Alevi 86
Von Luschan Nusayri 86
Chantre Anatolian Qizilbash 86.11
Chantre Cappadocian Turk 84.53
Hauschild and Wagen Seil Anatolian Turk 84.19
Pittart Anatolian Turk 84.78
ġevket Aziz Kansu Anatolian Turk 85.01
ġevket Aziz Kansu Anatolian Turk 84.19
Drawing on his own research as well as the sources he uses, Hasan ReĢit Tankut traces the ethnic origin of
the Nusayris to the Turks. It seems beneficial to us to have a look at other works of research which claim an
Arabic ethnic origin for the Nusayris. According to Andrew, the language of the Nusayris stems from the
Syriac/Lebanese dialect of Arabic which are part of Gabal and Ansari in Syria. Aringberg Laanatza argues
that the origin of Syrian Alawites, including the Nusayris living in Turkey, goes back to a homogeneous
Arabic clan. She emphasizes the importance of mother tongue in defining ethnic identity. She notes that,
for this reason, the linguistic element must be the basis on which the ethnic identities of Alawite groups are
established (Andrew, Arinberg-Laanatza; quoted in Türk, 2013: pp. 35-36). Sertel, on the other hand, notes
that the Nusayri identity has both ethnic and religious components, and argues that the religious and ethnic
components must be dealt with together (Sertel, 2005:p. 11).
The concept of language is a defining element of ethnic origin. Geographic and religious changes may
cause changes in ethnicity. The most outstanding change in such situations is linguistic change. Changes in
the religious structure may even cause changes in the way the masses think. In this connection, it is
necessary to note that the Nusayri sect is a religious system, and that being of Arabic origin was not a
prerequisite for its followers during its formation. However, in an effort to preserve the secrecy of their
doctrine of mystery, coming from a Nusayri family became a prerequisite over time for those joining the
Nusayri faith. It is noted in the abovementioned sources that it is possible that other ethnicities which
converted to the Nusayri faith may have become part of this closed religious group, become absorbed by
their numerous population through marriages, and become Arabized and lost touch with their native
languages and cultures. Under these circumstances, we need to accept the self-identification of today‟s
Nusayris as our basis. Even though there are those within these Nusayri communities who self-identify as
Turkmen or eti-Turk, we must take the language of the Nusayris and their views on their identity as our
basis and accept them as Arab Alawites.
3.4. The History of Nusayriyya and its Emergence
The Nusayri faith was founded in the Arabic city of Kufa by Abū Shuʿayb Muhammad ibn Nusayr al-Abdi
al-Bakri al-Numayri in the 9th century. Muhammad ibn Nusayr was among the elites of Basra. Being a close
associate of Ali ibn Muhammad al-Hadi and Hasan ibn Ali al-Askari , both of them Imams of Twelver Shia
Islam, Muhammad ibn Nusayr declared himself to be the Bab (gate) of Hasan ibn Ali al-Askari. Afterwards
he started spreading his particular esoteric doctrines and training disciples. The followers of Muhammad
ibn Nusayr were called Nusayri. What sets Muhammad ibn Nusayr and other Ja'fari movements apart is his
advocacy of esoteric beliefs which are otherwise not present in the Ja'fari faith; and, since he had declared
himself to be the bab of Hasan ibn Ali al-Askari, he and his followers were called ghulat (extremist), kafir
(infidel), batini (esoteric). Despite the ostracization by other sects, Muhammad ibn Nusayr managed to
form around himself a small community who believed in him and followed him (Keser, 2014:pp. 14-15).
After his death, Muhammad ibn Nusayr was succeeded by Muhammad ibn Jundab, who in turn was
succeeded by Muhammad al-Jannan al-Junbulani.During the leadership of al-Junbulani, a new order named
Junbulaniyya was founded.Al-Junbulani continued to spread the teachings of the order and to train
disciples. Junbulani met Hamdan al-Khasibi in Egypt, where he had gone to spread his teachings.Al-
Khasibi entered the Junbulaniyya order after meeting al-Junbulani.Following al-Junbulani, al-Khasibi
settled in Junbula and was taught here by Junbulani.Hamdan al-Khasibi assumed the leadership of the order
after the death of al-Junbulani.Al-Khasibi is credited with being the second founder of the Nusayri sect. For
it was during the leadership of al-Khasibi that the sect spread and gained recognition. After assuming
leadership, al-Khasibi first moved to Baghdad and then to Aleppo, where he continued to teach his
doctrine. In that period, Aleppo was ruled by Sayf al-Dawla, the founder of the Aleppo branch of the
Hamdanis. Many of al-Khasibi‟s disciples became emirs of the Buwayhis, Hamdanis and Fatimids. Kitab
al-Hidaya al-Kubra (Book of Greatest Guidance), written in Aleppo by al-Khasibi, was dedicated to Sayf
al-Dawla. It can be observed that the Hamdanis were the biggest supporters of the Nusayris. He wrote the
epistle Rast Bash (Persian, “Be Righteous”) under the patronage of Buwayhis and dedicated it to Adud al-
Dawla.Al-Khasibi and his disciples first called people of all religious beliefs and ethnicities to Islam and
then admitted those they found fitting into their order. One of the most significant figures of his period, al-
Khasibi was succeeded after his death by Sayyid Muhammad ibn Ali al-Jilli, who operated the center in
Aleppo, while the other center in Basra was operated by Sayyid al-Jisri, and the Nusayris thus came to be
administered from two centers. Following the death of Sayyid al-Jilli, the center in Aleppo was relocated to
Latakia and the leadership of the order was assumed by Abu Said al-Maymun ibn Qasim al-Tarabani. The
mountainous region surrounding Latakia became a Nusayri area in this period and came to be known since
then as the Nusayri Mountains. The Nusayri presence in Baghdad, on the other hand, came to an end with
the Mongolian invasion in 1258 (Keser, 2014:pp. 19-20; al-Tawil, 2000:pp. 153-212).
Al-Tarabani was the last religious leader of the whole Nusayri order, and after him there has not been
anyone to lead the whole order. Under the administration of individual sheiks ruling their respective
territories, Nusayri factions live in isolation from one another and under the authority of different
administrations (Uluçay, 2003:p. 7). In this same period, the allied forces of Kurds and Ismailis were
attacking the divided and isolated groups of Nusayris. Following these attacks, the Nusayris of Banyas of
Latakia asked the Nusayri emir of the Sinjar region in Iraq, Hasan al-Makzun Sinjari, to come to their aid.
In 1222, Sinjari and his troops conquered the area and united all the Nusayris under his authority. In
addition to jihad al-zahir, the jihad that is fought openly, Sinjari made jihad al-batin, the fight against one‟s
will and self, compulsory for the Nusayris.Following the death of al-Sinjari, the Nusayri union was lost
once again and the Nusayris began to live again in divided groups (Keser, 2014:pp. 21-22). In the following
periods, the areas inhabited by the Nusayris all came under Mamluk rule. The Mamluks were devoted
proponents of the Sunni faith. They did not tolerate other sects. It is for this reason that they made the
construction of mosques in Nusayri villages an obligation. They forbade entry into the Nusayri sect and
forbade the Nusayris from drinking wine and using it in their rituals. They imposed heavy taxes on the
Nusayris. The Mamluks were acting in an effort to eradicate the Nusayriyya. Unable to withstand religious
and economic pressures, the Nusayris started a messianic uprising, but it was brutally crushed by the
Mamluks (Friedman, 2010:pp. 52-58; Keser, 2014:pp. 21-23; Al-Tawil, 2000:pp. 225-230). Trying to
handle intense pressures, the Nusayris were faced for the first time in this period fatwas that were issued
against them. The first fatwa against the Nusayris was issued in 1317 by Taqi al-Din ibn Taymiyyah. In his
fatwa, Taymiyyah declares that the Nusayris are deviants who harm the religion of Islam, and goes as far as
to say that they are not Muslims. In addition to all this negative discourse, Taymiyya decrees that the
Nusayris are not to be interred in Muslim cemeteries, that their food is not to be shared and their women
are not to be married, and that they should not be admitted into the military. He even asserts in clear terms
that Muslims should hunt down Nusayris, and that it is acceptable for a Muslim to confiscate Nusayri
property and to enslave Nusayri women and children (Frieadman, 2010:pp. 62,189-192; Keser, 2014:pp.
23-24).
Following the conquests of Syria, Palestine, and Egypt by Sultan Selim I, the Nusayris began to live under
Ottoman authority. Faced with such pressure under Mamluk rule, the Nusayris endeavored for a long time to
preserve their status as a congregation. However, after Selim I put an end to Mamluk rule, the same kind of
pressure was inflicted on the Nusayris. The Nusayri presence in Aleppo almost came to an end in this
period. Nuh al-Hanafi al-Dimashqi, mufti of Syria, issued a fatwa similar to that issued by Taymiyya against
the Nusayris and other esoteric groups. The period saw once again heavy taxes inflicted on the Nusayris,
who were under religious and economic pressure. Many Nusayris who were unable to stand these pressures
left their homes and took refuge in the Nusayri mountains situated between Tripoli and Antioch (Al-Tawil,
2000:pp. 247-258; Keser, 2014:p. 24). By the middle of the 19th century, Ottoman policies toward the
Nusayris reflected a considerable degree of relaxation. Every religion within the Ottoman State was
considered a millet (nation). Muslims were the real custodians of the state. Others were known as dhimmi.
However, the Nusayris, Druze, Yazidis, Wahhabis, Ismailis and Hurufis were not considered dhimmi and
were shown tolerance (Aksoy, 2010:p. 204; Uluçay, 2003:p. 8; Keser, 2014:p. 25).
The Ottoman State had weakened during the reign of Abdulhamit II. Imperial powers took advantage of this
opportunity to pursue policies aimed at dividing communities of different religions, sects and ethnicities that
inhabited the Ottoman State. Conscious of this situation, the Ottoman State took numerous measures to
preserve social unity. There had been policies aimed at encouraging the conversion of the Druze, Yazidis,
and Nusayris into Sunni Islam. Within the framework of these policies, jizya tax was not levied on these
groups, mosques and schools were built in their villages, and they were admitted into the military (Uluçay,
2003:pp. 8-11; Türk, 2013:p. 47). In this period, very few Nusayris owned their own land. They generally
worked at farms owned by Sunni and Christian landlords. Even though it was thought that some Nusayris
had converted to the Hanefi school of Islam as a result of these policies of Sunnification, the landlords who
employed Nusayris in their service claimed that they had never really converted but had only chosen to
appear that way in an effort to gain land and power. This situation created constant tension between the
Sunni population and the Nusayris. Conflict even arose between the two groups during shared religious
rituals and were suppressed by the Ottoman administration. Further, not having much economic power, the
Nusayris staged frequent uprisings against the Ottoman policies of conscription and taxation, which were
crushed by the Ottoman State‟s harsh military actions. A new period dawned for the Nusayris when the First
World War came to an end. The areas they inhabited for centuries under Ottoman rule had now come under
the authority of new powers after the dissolution of the Ottoman State. While some Nusayris remained
within the present borders of the Republic of Turkey, Syria and Lebanon came under French authority. This
development largely destroyed the historical ties between the Nusayris of Turkey and Syria (Bilgili et al.,
2010:p. 77; Al-Tawil, 2000:pp. 288-294; Keser, 2014:pp.25-29)
4. THE BELIEFS AND FUNDAMENTALS OF THE NUSAYRI FAITH
We have already mentioned that the Nusayris are known as a batini (esoteric) sect due to their beliefs. In
the Nusayri faith, there is a zahiri (exoteric) and batini (esoteric) side to everything, and the universe, as
well as all creation, is based on this relationship of duality. Nusayris use the name al-Nur (the Light) to
express their belief that material conception is incapable of comprehending God, and Ma’na (Meaning) to
describe God as the reason for all creation (Keser, 2014:p. 53). In the exoteric context, Ali is the imam, but
in the esoteric context, he is the manifestation of ma’na. Ali is in fact the earthly manifestation of the
Creator. Even though some Nusayris deny their belief in hulul for fear of social pressure, the section on
shahada (profession of faith) in the 11th chapter of Hamdan al-Khasibi‟s sixteen-chapter work, Kitab al-
Majmu, confirms the presence of hulul in the Nusayri faith.
I testify that there is no god but Ali ibn Abi Talib, and no hijab but Muhammad Mahmud, and no
bab but Salman al-Farisi (Turan-Translation of Kitabu-l Mecmu).
We have already mentioned that ma‟na is one of the attributes of God. According to Nusayris, God reveals
himself on earth in certain periods known as qubba. In each of these revelations, “Ism” and “Bab”
accompany him. Ma‟na is God himself, Ism the prophet, and Bab is the gate that assists them. God revealed
himself on earth seven times before Abel and seven times after Abel. Before Abel, he became manifested
as al-Hannu, al-Yannu, Azdashir, Durettud, al-Barru, al-Rahim, Yussef al-Hakim (Aristotle). Ma‟na
became manifested in human form seven times after Abel, and the last time was his hulul in Ali‟s body (
see: table.2), (Keser, 2014:p. 54; Türk, 2013:p. 49).
Table 2: The forms in which God was manifested (hulul) after Abel (Türk, 2013:p. 49)
Ma’na Ism Bab
Abel Adam Gabriel
Seth Noah Yail Ibn Fatin
Joseph Jacob Ham Ibn Kush
Joshua Moses Dan Ibn Usbaud
Asaf Solomon Abd Allah Ibn Siman
Simon Peter Jesus Rawzaba Ibn al-Marzuban
Ali Muhammad Salman al-Farisi
Mystery is a key element in the Nusayri faith, since it is an esoteric belief system. This mystery has
developed around three letters.
use a different hand gesture).During rituals, a drink made of grape juice, called nakfi, is distributed as part
of the ritual. People known as naqeeb and najeeb assist the sheikh during communal rituals. Naqeeb is the
apprentice sheikh who comes from the same lineage as the sheikh. Najeeb is usually someone who is
favored by the community and who, without having to come from the sheikh‟s lineage, assists the sheikh
during rituals. Communal rituals are performed during feasts and offerings, as well as during initiation
ceremonies (Keser, 2014:pp. 65,89-91; Türk, 2013:pp. 94-95).
4.2. Initiation into the Nusayri Sect
One of the most important rules for admission into the sect is to come from a Nusayri family. People who
come from non-Nusayri families are not admitted into the sect. The second rule for admission into the sect
is to be a male of sound mind. The continuity and transmission from generation to generation of Nusayri
beliefs is carried out by the institution of religious unclehood. Any child (around ages 12-14) who meets
the prerequisites and is thought to have matured enough for admission into the sect, first chooses someone
as his religious uncle. The child‟s father and brothers cannot act as his religious uncle. Once the uncle has
been chosen, the child‟s process of initiation into the sect lasts over a period of seven to nine months and
includes three rituals. Nusayris believe that the day of initiation, whereby the person gains access to the
mystery, is the true birth of a person; for this reason, the first ritual symbolizes insemination. An
insignificant secret is revealed to the child during this first ritual, and the child is then observed by his
family and other members of the community to find out whether or not he keeps the secret until the next
ritual. The second ritual is performed for the children who manage to keep this secret. The second ritual
represents the conception stage. The child memorizes the letter Ayn, Mim, Sin during this ritual and takes
vows not to reveal the secrets. The third ritual represents the day of birth. The child, who has had his true
birth as a Nusayri, pays a visit to the house of his religious uncle. He stays there for 30 or 40 days, and
memorizes prayers and the sections of the Kitab al-Majmu. Having completed the training he received from
the religious uncle, the child is now a Nusayri and returns home a true Nusayri (Türk, 2013:pp. 91-100;
Keser, 2014:pp. 41-50).
4.3. Nusayri Belief in Holy Books
There are two holy books for the Nusayris; the first one is, without doubt, the Quran al-Karim, considered
holy by Muslims. Nusayris believe that the Quran al-Karim has an exoteric meaning that is accessible to
and can be comprehended by everyone, and an esoteric meaning which is not accessible to and cannot be
comprehended by everyone. The esoteric rather than the exoteric side of the Quran al-Karim is much more
important for the Nusayris. For instance, when an oath is taken in the Surat al-Tin of the Quran al-Karim
“by the fig and the olive,” while the exoteric meaning is that an oath is taken by two trees, the esoteric
meaning is that these two represent Egypt and Syria. Nusayris also believe that the Quran al-Karim has
been altered and therefore lost its true meaning. The other book considered holy by the Nusayris is the
Kitab al-Majmu. Written by Hamdan al-Khasibi, this book is considered the foundation of the faith. Kitab
al-Majmu is a book of religious and ritual training. There are claims that the first five surats of the Kitab
al-Majmu were written by Hamdan al-Khasibi, while the remaining 11 were written by different Nusayri
sheiks and scholars over a period of more than a thousand years. Kitab al-Majmu was published for the first
time in Tarsus by Süleyman Efendi, a Nusayri native of Adana who later converted to Christianity and was
assassinated in Tarsus. It was later translated to English and French. It was translated into Turkish for the
first time by Ahmet Turan (Turan, 1996:p. 6-7). Another book considered important by the Nusayris is the
Kitab al-Jafr. Nusayris believe that this book was written by Ali himself. They describe the book as a kind
of book of oracles which offers information about everything that takes place from the time of creation
until the day of judgment. As a result of the pressure and restrictions inflicted on them, Nusayris have been
transmitting ritual and religious knowledge only face to face from a sheikh to a new initiate. Only a portion
of this knowledge has been written down and made subjective. Nusayris possess records of their religious
knowledge that has been transmitted from generation to generation. The longer one of these begins with al-
Jilli. The shorter one begins with al-Jisri. The shortest prayer to be taught is called “kitni” (Türk,
2013:pp.100-1004; Üzüm, 2000:pp. 173-187).
4.4. Nusayri Feasts and Holy Days
The Nusayri faith has hundreds of holy days and feasts to be celebrated. Some of these are Islamic feasts
and holy days celebrated by all Muslims. In addition, numerous feasts originally belonging to other
religions are celebrated by the Nusayris. Feasts of Christian origin are especially numerous; this is as much
due to the fact that the Nusayris accept the prophets of every religion and consider every religion holy, as it
is to the fact that there has been interactions as a result of inhabiting the same area; or it can possibly be a
remnant from those times when they would perform taqiyya. Nusayris also have traditional feasts
belonging to their own culture which are celebrated depending on natural changes and historical
events.There are also feasts known as “Leyli” (nocturnal). The most significant characteristic of Nusayri
feasts is custodianship. Certain families act as custodians of certain feasts and these feasts are celebrated
each year in their houses. Custodianship can be transmitted by way of a son inheriting it from his father.
Nusayris celebrate these feasts and nights in a spirit of solidarity and cooperation. Feasts are celebrated at
shrines if the custodian‟s house is not convenient. On feast days, men and women gather in solidarity to
prepare a feast for the guests. A traditional dish called Khrisi, often made of meat and wheat, is prepared.
Communal prayer is performed and zakat is offered to the ones in need (Türk, 2013:pp.120-126; Keser,
2014:p. 94).
5. A POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE SYRIAN STATE AND THE RISE OF NUSAYRIS
ALONG WITH BAATH
After the First World War, the French invaded Syria and established a mandatory administration in the
region. Implementing a strategy to divide and conquer, France divided the region into the State of Aleppo,
the State of Damascus, Jabal al-Druze State, Alawite State, and the State of Greater Lebanon (Ataman,
2012:p. 7). It was for the first time in this period that the Nusayris were called Arab Alawites. The Latakia
region of Syria was named an Alawite region for the first time during this process. In 1922, the Alawite
State, one of the first artificial states in the Middle East, was established. In 1939, this state was
reincorporated into Syria as a province within the country. It was for the first time during this period that
the Nusayris gained official recognition and could live without restrictions. The French practice of
providing arms and military training for minorities was in fact a turning point for the Nusayris. Nusayris
accounted for half of the French “Troupes spéciales du Levant,” a military corps organized into eight
battalions (Pipes, 1990:pp. 158-175). Nusayris were trained in military arts within these corps and began to
understand the military system. They were receiving education in French schools offering western style
education, and some of them were being sent to Europe for their education. The idea of climbing the social
ladder by means of education became widespread among the Nusayris, who were admitted also into
military schools, and thus an educated Nusayri elite and middle class emerged (Keser, 2014:p. 32). In the
year 1942, the Alawite State which had been established under French mandatory rule was incorporated
into the Syrian State. However, the Nusayris, who had achieved political and administrative status for the
first time, were split into two groups regarding their incorporation into the Syrian State. While Nusayri
intellectuals favored the idea of incorporation into the Syrian State, tribal leaders and sheiks were not
willing to be incorporated into any state structure. Despite this disagreement, they were incorporated into
the Syrian State in 1942. During the period following their incorporation, Nusayris occupied many
administrative positions within the Syrian State and played an active role in the formation of the Socialist
Baath Party (Keser, 2014:p. 30).
By the year 1946, Syria had gained its independence from France. In the process up to its independence,
Syria had been colonized, and impoverished due to the existence of landlord tribes. Bureaucracy was
monopolized by a class of wealthy and aristocratic people, who had retained their wealth since the period
of French mandate and were supported by the wealthy urban population. Having experienced enough
poverty, Syria experienced divisions within itself in an already divided Arab World, and this resulted in a
political vacuum. The Baath Party, meaning the Arab Renaissance Party, emerged in this period with Arab
nationalism as its basis. Before Baath, Said al-Husri was without doubt the first name to come to mind in
relation to Arab nationalism. Having a secular ideological basis, Said al-Husri argued that their shared
culture was the foundation of the Arab Nation and that the Arab Nation had a history going back to pre-
Islamic times, and he emphasized the fact that religions were a part of their culture. He had as his goal the
unification of the divided Arabs into one nation with a shared culture. He sought to unite Arabs of different
religions on the basis of shared historical and cultural values. In this connection, Said al-Husri influenced
Michel Aflaq, who was himself an Arab but a Christian. Further developing al-Husri‟s nationalist ideology,
Michel Aflaq emphasized the existence of a shared Arabic culture and history, as well as the insignificance
of differences between Arabs (Çitil, 2013:p. 68). During the period from the year 1920 until the
independence of Syria, the nationalists in Syria and in other Arabic countries were involved in an anti-
imperialistic movement. In the post-independence period, they analyzed and dealt with both economic and
social problems. Placing special emphasis on the colonial period, they believed the unification of Arabs to
be their salvation if they wanted to avoid going back to that period. In light of these problems and
conclusions, the principles of Baath were shaped, and the constitution of the party was in turn determined
sssjournal.com Social Sciences Studies Journal (SSSJournal) [email protected]
2127
Social Sciences Studies Journal (SSSJournal) 2019 Vol:5 Issue:33 pp:2119-2131
by these principles. Even though the initial foundations of Baath were laid in 1943, its first congress took
place in 1947 with the participation of Michel Aflaq (Christian), Salah al-Din al-Bitar (Sunni), and Zaki al-
Arsuzi (Nusayri), and it was in this period that it become an active political party. The Baath Party in Syria
was organized into cells, groups, sections, branches, regional command and national congress. Its
organization into cells implies that Baath was in fact engaging in a secret organization as well (ġentürk,
2003:p. 58).
Shukri al-Quwatli was elected the first president of independent Syria. President Shukri al-Quwatli was
toppled in a military coup in 1949. After Adib Shishakli, who had seized power through this military coup,
was overthrown, Baath won 18 parliamentary seats in the election. Shukri al-Quwatli was once again
elected president (1954). In this period, Baathism developed beyond Syria‟s borders, and the United Arab
Republic was created as a result of an agreement to unite Syria and Egypt. However, in practice the union
did not work as had been theorized. A group of military officers had formed a secret committee within the
Syrian State Army. The objective of this committee was to introduce a series of reforms and to seize
control. Among the leaders of this organization were Salah Jadid, Hafez al-Assad, Muhammad Umran and
Humad Ubeid (Galvani, 1974:pp. 3-16). In the year 1961, the conservative Sunni officers of Damascus
staged a coup under Abd al-Karim al-Nahlawi‟s leadership. After the coup d‟état, Syria unilaterally
seceded from the United Arab Republic (Ataman, 2012:pp. 8,9). The coup of 1961 was in fact a turning
point for Baath. The failure of the United Arab Republic resulted in a pronounced factionalism within the
Baath Party, which had supported the creation of the union. The party, which had previously sought to
unite all Arabs, now switched to Arab nationalism within Syria‟s borders. Power struggles continued and
military coups followed one another after this period. The Baathist military officers staged another coup in
March 1963 and seized power. Himself a Nusayri, Hafez al-Assad became Commander of the Syrian Air
Force. Another Nusayri, Salah Jadid became Chief of Staff of the Syrian Army. Muhammad Umran
assumed the role of military commander. During this period, the Baath party organized its 6th Congress in
Damascus and shifted more toward Marxism (ġen, 2010:p. 235). An uprising started in Hama led by the
Muslim Brotherhood, who opposed this shift toward Marxism, but was crushed by the Syrian State. In
1964 Salah Bitar was elected prime minister and led a campaign against M. Aflaq. The word “Islam” was
included in the new constitution to avoid aggravating the situation further. At the 8th National Congress,
Michel Aflaq resigned from his position as the party's leader. A new coup d‟état led by Hafez al-Assad was
staged in 1966. M. Aflaq was sent into exile. Nureddin al-Atassi, a Sunni, was delegated to form a
government. Hafez al-Assad was appointed defense minister and commander of the Syrian Air Force.
Nusayris were now rising to power, and the period of Neo-Baathism had officially started. In the following
period, Hafez al-Assad claimed that the Syrian defeat in the ongoing conflict against Israel had diminished
trust in the government and seized power in a bloodless coup. Ahmad al-Khatib was appointed president.
Hafez al-Assad was appointed with leading the government. He was elected president in the 1971
referendum (Ataman, 2012:p. 9). On 31 January 1973, he removed the word “Islam” from the constitution.
After 1970, Hafez al-Assad took special care to install Nusayris in critical positions within the Syrian State.
Nusayri factions emerged within the intelligence and military. It has been claimed that he installed
members of the secular Sunni elite in his cabinet to avoid criticism from the Sunnis (Dam, 2000:pp. 134-
136).
Al-Assad always gave importance to his relations with the USSR, a superpower of the period. His aim was
to use this strong ally to gain power and not be left alone in the Middle East. In 1973, he sided with Egypt
in the Arab–Israeli War against Israel, which had expanded its territory after the Six-Day War, in an effort
to take back the occupied territories; however, the war ended in defeat. Syria and Egypt parted ways after
this war. Hafez al-Assad‟s administration supported the Palestine Liberation Organization against Israel. In
1975 the Lebanese Civil War started. In 1976, despite the objections other Arabic countries, Syria decided
to enter Lebanon and supported the Palestine Liberation Organization. In 1982, an uprising against the
government started in Hama, known as the stronghold of the Muslim Brotherhood. However, this uprising
was crushed brutally. It estimated that 5000 to 25000 people lost their lives in Hama (Dam, 2000: 183-
184). In 1984, Hafez al-Assad entered a power struggle with his brother, Rifaat al-Assad. Rifaat al-Assad
attempted to stage a coup d‟état but failed, and he was subsequently sent into exile. In 2000, the late Hafez
al-Assad is succeeded by his son, Bashar al-Assad. Bashar al-Assad introduced a series of expected reforms
and started the period known as “Damascus Spring”. The reforms were not found sufficient and instead
mobilized the Syrian intellectuals who prepared a manifesto and presented it to the government. The
manifesto called for free elections and new political parties, but these posed threats for the government. For
this reason, the process known as Damascus Spring came to an end, and the government took an anti-
reformist stance (Ataman, 2012:p. 24; Çitil, 2013:pp. 97, 98).
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, Syria was mentioned by the USA among the countries which
possessed nuclear weapons. America therefore imposed an embargo against Syria. Foreign pressure on
Syria intensified (Dağ, 2013:p. 60; Arıkan, 2012:p. 26). In 2011, the Arab Spring, a movement which had
started in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, spread also to Syria. Anti-government protests calling for democracy
and freedom erupted in the Syrian city of Daraa, and spread to other cities within a short span of time.
Many people lost their lives as a result of the harsh military response to the protests. America condemned
Bashar al-Assad for the atrocities and called for his resignation. Thus, the Syrian civil war which would
claim the lives of thousands and turn thousands into refugees seeking asylum in other countries, began.
Bashar al-Assad continued the foreign policy that had taken shape during his father‟s presidency. He
strengthened his alliance with Iran and Russia against America and Israel. In May 2017, the plan for
creating safe zones within Syria was signed with the participation of Russia, Iran and Turkey. After that the
Syrian Civil War entered a period of virtual standstill (Arıkan, 2012:p.28; Dağ, 2013:pp. 86-87).
6. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELIGION AND IDEOLOGY
The concept of ideology was employed for the first time in the 18th century during the French Revolution
by Antoine Destutt de Tracy and a group known as the society of ideologists, to refer to society‟s activity
and system of ideas as well as the science of ideas (Bulut, 2011:p. 184). Numerous thinkers, social and
political scientists have tried to define ideology in the periods after the ideologists. It is for this reason that
ideology has a number of positive and negative definitions. David Mclellan argues that, among the
terminology of social sciences, ideology is the most ambiguous and the most difficult to define
(Mclellan,1999). In the broadest sense, ideology refers to the totality of political, religious, legal,
philosophical, scientific ideas which shape the behaviors of a society by shaping political and social
teachings, or which may be accepted as a vision or an ideal (Turkish Language Association). As can be
seen, ideology is an index of ideals and goals. It seeks to find ways to actualize these ideals. Ideology is the
sum total of ideas which aim to find the causes for the emergence of ideals, to define the problems, and to
take action based on the solutions it finds to the problems. These ideas can be based as much on the sum
total of economic, philosophical, ethical values as on dogmatic structures which, like religions and sects,
claim to possess the absolute truth. Each ideology introduces a worldview. Karl Mannheim argues that an
ideology covers the whole Weltanschauung (worldview) of a social class or society or even a historical
period. Thus ideology and worldview have become two concepts which tend to be employed together.
Ideologies require absolute submission, they do not accept other ideologies. Ideologies can be classified
into main categories such as religion, nationalism, socialism. Primitive, polytheistic religions as well as
Abrahamic religions such as Islam or Judaism are studied within the category of religious ideology. The
proponents of the idea that there is no relation between religion and ideology claim that the most important
difference between the two is that religions are for individuals and ideologies for societies. If we look at
their emergence, we see that religions are in fact revolts against the existing order in their respective
societies. In a general sense, there is no individual religion for a single person. Acts of worship are what is
individual. Religions are aimed at societies. Émile Durkheim asserts that religion is an institution which
offers a miniature version of society. According to Durkheim, religion is a social phenomenon. It is social,
not individual (Mardin, 2017:pp. 45-46).
According to Alfred Brown, religion forms the skeleton of social structure and presents it in a way that
people can understand; it also creates emotions in order to ensure the continuation of society (Mardin,
2017:pp. 47-49). Every religion seeks to keep society under control by means of its dogmas. It aims to
solve social problems through these dogmas and to refine social structure. Social activity is kept under
control through these dogmatic rules. It is even a mechanism that organizes societies into collective action.
This side of religion offers an explanation of its relationship to ideology. To look at a more specific case,
the division of Islam into sects is a political move. Each of these sects offers a distinct worldview. The fact
that these sects generate political and social teachings to shape social activity, reveals the ideological side
of sects. Jean-William Lapierre argues that ideologies are merciless, and adds that they do not allow the
emergence of an opposing system of thought and want to destroy the existing ones (Ergil, 1983:p. 72).
Sectarian conflicts that have been going on for centuries, especially between the Shiite and Sunnite sects,
reveal the merciless side of ideologies. According to Philip E. Converse, people learn their systems of
belief as wholes. These beliefs that they learn, they adopt from the societies they inhabit. According to
Converse, the need to coexist in society is a coercive force. He argues that a belief system becomes
ideological inasmuch as it includes coercive forces (Mardin, 2017:p. 158). The fact that Nusayris are a
closed society in which individuals grow up under the influence of indoctrination from a young age, reveals
how coercive this society is. According to Karl Mannheim, ideologies are ideas which cannot completely
reveal those things they offer which are at odds with the system. While utopias are idealized versions of the
future which serve the interests of communities living under pressure. Ideology and Utopia are two
inseparable concepts (Mardin, 2015:pp. 57-58). In a way, it can be argued that ideologies offer Utopias. In
Shia Islam, a Mahdist utopia has emerged against other sects or the system (Bulduruç, 2013). It is
necessary to note that, while ideologies may undergo revisions and change in accordance with new or
different practices created by changes in social relations, they may also give birth to a distinct type of
ideology. This is exemplified by the division of Shia Islam into numerous sects which were further divided
into competing sub-sects over the course of history.
7. CONCLUSION
Societies, like individuals, are wholes which have their distinct characteristics and personalities, and which
are subject to change. It is natural that societies which share the religious or racial basis of their social
structure, or even only a shared culture, also have shared fears. It is for this reason that the most important
needs of societies are safety and security. All other needs are secondary to these two important needs.
Societies seek to preserve their social structures and take measures that will protect them against possible
outside threats. The actions of different societies which inhabit the same geographical area are related to
one another in this sense as well. Over the course of history, the sovereigns who ruled over them or the
other societies of the region have tried to engage the Nusayris. Different religious and political ideologies
which occupied the territories they inhabited saw them as a threat or as competition and caused them
damage. Especially under Mamluk rule, the Nusayris were targeted by Sunni ideology, which represented
them as non-Islamic and tried to eradicate them by means of heavy sanctions. The representation of
heterodox sects and religious groups as non-Islamic by mainstream Islamic sects is in fact a result of their
potential to found new states (Mardin, 2017:p. 69). Each sect, Sunni or Shia or their sub-sects, rejects one
another because of this threat. This situation not only reveals the political and ideological side of belief
systems, it also exemplifies how destructive ideologies are toward other ideologies. Above all else,
ideologies seek to preserve their existence. As a result of the pressures inflicted on them, Nusayris became
a closed society. They have managed to survive by means of hiding themselves, concealing their identity,
and through sectarian teachings and indoctrination within the family.
We have already mentioned that the division of Islam into sects was a political move. Shia Islam, which
emerged after this division, is an ideological sect from which have emerged other ideological sub-sects.
Taking this as our point of departure, we can argue that, since the Nusayri faith is a sub-sect of Shia Islam,
it has been an ideological sect since its emergence. It is highly probable that, even though it had an
expansionist character when it first emerged, the Nusayri ideology has undergone revisions over time due
to the pressure from other sectarian ideologies, and it has managed to survive by introducing certain inner
dogmas and worldviews within the society in which it was practiced. According to Lévi-Strauss, primitive
people endeavor to organize their knowledge in a process which he calls bricolage (Strauss, 1966:pp., 21-
33). This is how Mardin explains the situation: bricolage, that is the endeavor to create a worldview, which
emerges at the level of common people as the appearance of a mass society is gained, also has an effect on
the elites. Over the course of modernization, minor cultures begin to gnaw on major cultures, and over time
place themselves within the structures of major cultures (Mardin, 2017:p. 152). Over time, the Nusayris
also wanted to place themselves within a larger structure, and installed themselves intellectually within the
structure of Baath. Nationalism, socialism, and secularism, which were the cornerstones of Baath, not only
reflected the shared fears of the Nusayri community, they also reflected the ideology of this community
which had revised itself into a closed group.
SOURCES
AKSOY, E. (2010). “Nusayrilerin Sosyal Yapıları Ve Cumhuriyetin Ilk Yıllarında Türkiye‟de YaĢayan Bu
Topluluğa Devletin YaklaĢımları”. Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaşi Veli Araştırma Dergisi, Vol: 54, pp. 199-
212.
ARIKAN, P. (2012), “Suriye„nin Nusayri Yüzü ve Ġran”, Ortadoğu Analiz Dergisi, Vol: 4, No: 43, pp.19-
29.
ATAMAN, M. (2012). “Suriye‟de Ġktidar Mücadelesi: Baas Rejimi, Toplumsal Talepler ve Uluslararası
Toplum”, SETA Report, pp. 6-55.
BĠLGĠLĠ, A. S.vd. (2010), Osmanlı Arşiv Belgelerinde Nusayriler ve Nusayrilik (1745-1920), TC. Gazi
Üniversitesi Türk Kültürü ve Hacı BektaĢi Veli AraĢtırma Merkezi AraĢtırma Dizisi, Ankara.
BULUT, Y. (2011), “Ġdeolojinin Tarihçesi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Vol: 3, No:23, pp.183-
206.
BULDURUÇ, S.Y. (2013), “Ġslamda Politik Ayrımlar ve Devrimci KopuĢ”, http://www.teorivepolitika.net.
pp.56-57, Accessed Date 07.11.2017
ÇAĞATAY, N. vd. ÇUBUKÇU, Ġ. A. (1985), “İslam Mezhepleri Tarihi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Press,
Ankara.
ÇĠTĠL, S. (2013), “Ortadoğuda Devlet-Mezhep Pragmatizmi Doğrultusunda Oluşturulan Politikalar:
Suriyede Yönetimi Şekillendiren Nusayriler”, (BasılmamıĢ Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Abant Ġzzet Baysal
Üniversitesi Sosyal bilimler Enstitüsü Uluslararası iliĢkiler ABD, Bolu, pp.124.
DAĞ, A. E. (2013), “Suriye Bilad’ı Şam’ın Hazin Öyküsü”, ĠHH Ġnsani YardımVakfı AraĢtırma ve
Yayınlar Birimi, Mavi Ofset, 2.Baskı, Ġstanbul, pp.211.
DAM, N.V.(2000), “Suriye’de İktidar Mücadelesi”, Translate .S.Ġdiz ve A.F.Çalkivik,Ġstanbul ĠletiĢim
Press.
ERGĠL, D. (1983), “Ġdeoloji Üzerine DüĢünceler”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Vol:38, No:1, pp.69-
95.
ET-TAVĠL M. E. G. (2000), “Arap Alevileri’nin Tarihi Nusayriler”, Translate. Özdemir, Ġ. Çivi Yazıları.
LUCHAN, F. V. (1922),Völker Reisen Sprachen,Welt-Verlac-Berlin.
KESER, Ġ.(2014), “Nusayri Alevilik, Tarih İnanç Kimlik”, Telos Press, Ġstanbul.
LAPĠERRE, J.W.(1981),"İdeoloji Nedir?", Ġlimler ve Ġdeolojiler, Translate, Fahrettin Arslan, Ankara
MARDĠN, ġ. (2017), “Din ve İdeoloji”, ĠletiĢim Press, Ġstanbul.
MARDĠN, ġ. (2015), “İdeoloji”, ĠletiĢim Press, Ġstanbul.
MANNHEĠM, K.(2016) "İdeoloji ve Ütopya", Çev.Mehmet Okyayuz, Nika Press, Ankara.
MCLELLAND, D.(1999), “İdeoloji”, Çev: Ercüment Özkaya, Doruk Press, Ankara.
MELĠKOFF, I. (1994), “Uyur idik, Uyardılar”, Alevilik-BektaĢilik AraĢtırmaları, Translate. ALPTEKĠN,
T. Cem Press.
PIPES, D. (1990), “Greater Syria: The History of an Ambition”, Oxford Unıversıty Press.
SERTEL, E. (2005), “Dini ve Etnik Kimlikleriyle Nusayriler”, Ütopya Press, Ankara.
STRAUSS, C. L. (1966), “The Savage Mind”, English Translation, George Weidenfeld and Nicolson Ltd,
The Garden City Press Limited, Great Britain.
ġEN, S. (2010), “Ortadoğuda İdeolojik Bunalım-Suriye Baas Partisi ve İdeolojisi”, 2. Baskı, Ġstanbul.
ġENTÜRK, D. (2003), “Ortadoğu’da Arap Birliği rüyası: Saddam’ın Baas’ı”, Alfa Press, Ġstanbul.
TANKUT, H. R., “Nusayriler ve Nusayrilik hakkında”, Ulus Basım Evi, Ankara,1938
TOPALOĞLU, F. (2001), “Hz. Ali'nin Hz. Osman Devri Siyasi Olaylarına Yönelik Tutumu”, (BasılmamıĢ
Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Temel Ġslam Bilimleri ABD.
TURAN, Ahmet, (1996), “Kitabu‟l-Mecmu‟nun Tercümesi”, 19 Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi
Dergisi, Vol.8, pp.5-18
TÜRK, H. (2013), “Nusayrilik, İnanç Sistemleri Ve Kültürel Özellikleri”, Kaknüs Press, Ġstanbul
ULUÇAY, Ö. (2003), Nusayrilik Ġnanç Esasları-Tenasuh-Karahan Kitap Evi-Adana.
ÜZÜM, Ġ. (2007), “Nusayrilik”, Ġslam Ansiklopetisi, Cilt.33,Ġstanbul, pp.270-274.
ÜZÜM, Ġ. (2000), “Türkiye‟de Alevi / Nusayri Önderlerinin Eserlerinde Ġnanç Konularına YaklaĢım”,
İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol.4, pp.173-187.
YARON, F. (2010), “The Nusayri-Alawis”, Leiden and Boston: Brill.