Scribd
Upload
26 views

Comparative Report On Flutter and React Native

The document compares Flutter and React Native frameworks. Flutter uses Dart and Skia for rendering while React Native uses JavaScript and native components. Flutter has better performance for animations and graphics while React Native can have overhead from its bridge. Both support hot reloading but Flutter is more stable. Flutter learning curve includes Dart while React Native is easier for JavaScript developers.

Uploaded by

wardahabid03
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
26 views

Comparative Report On Flutter and React Native

The document compares Flutter and React Native frameworks. Flutter uses Dart and Skia for rendering while React Native uses JavaScript and native components. Flutter has better performance for animations and graphics while React Native can have overhead from its bridge. Both support hot reloading but Flutter is more stable. Flutter learning curve includes Dart while React Native is easier for JavaScript developers.

Uploaded by

wardahabid03
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Comparative Report on Flutter and React Native

Introduction

Flutter and React Native are two prominent frameworks for cross-platform mobile application
development. They enable developers to build applications for both iOS and Android using a
single codebase, significantly reducing development time and cost. This report explores the key
differences between Flutter and React Native across various dimensions such as architecture,
performance, development experience, community support, and more.

1. Framework Overview

Flutter

• Developer: Google
• Language: Dart
• Release Year: 2017
• Primary Use Case: High-performance, visually appealing mobile applications.

React Native

• Developer: Facebook
• Language: JavaScript (with JSX)
• Release Year: 2015
• Primary Use Case: Versatile, performant mobile applications with extensive library
support.

2. Architecture

Flutter

• Layered Architecture: Comprises a series of independent layers, including the Dart


framework, Skia (graphics engine), and C/C++ engine.
• Rendering: Uses Skia to render its UI, providing a consistent look and feel across
platforms.

React Native

• Bridge and Native Modules: Utilizes a JavaScript bridge to communicate with native
modules, enabling the use of native components.
• Rendering: Renders using native components, giving a native look and feel but
potentially leading to performance bottlenecks due to the bridge.

3. Performance
Flutter

• Rendering Performance: High, thanks to direct compilation of Dart to native code and
the use of Skia.
• Animation and Graphics: Smooth and high-performing animations due to its own
rendering engine.

React Native

• Rendering Performance: Generally good but can suffer due to the overhead of the
JavaScript bridge.
• Animation and Graphics: Performance can be impacted by the JavaScript bridge,
though optimizations like Hermes (a JavaScript engine) help mitigate this.

4. Development Experience

Flutter

• Hot Reload: Fast and reliable, allowing quick iteration without losing state.
• Widget Library: Rich set of pre-designed widgets for consistent and high-quality UI
across platforms.
• IDE Support: Excellent support in Android Studio and Visual Studio Code.

React Native

• Hot Reload: Available but can be less stable compared to Flutter.


• Component Library: Extensive library of components and third-party libraries,
leveraging the rich JavaScript ecosystem.
• IDE Support: Good support in various IDEs, including Visual Studio Code and IntelliJ.

5. Community and Ecosystem

Flutter

• Community Size: Growing rapidly with strong backing from Google.


• Package Ecosystem: Increasing number of packages and plugins, though not as
extensive as React Native's ecosystem.

React Native

• Community Size: Large and established community with numerous contributors.


• Package Ecosystem: Vast array of third-party libraries and plugins due to its mature
JavaScript foundation.

6. Learning Curve
Flutter

• Learning Dart: Requires learning Dart, which may be unfamiliar to developers with a
background in JavaScript or other languages.
• Documentation: Comprehensive and well-structured official documentation.

React Native

• Familiarity with JavaScript: Easier for developers already familiar with JavaScript and
React.
• Documentation: Extensive documentation and numerous tutorials available due to its
popularity.

7. Integration and Flexibility

Flutter

• Integration with Native Code: Supports integration with native code (Java, Swift,
Objective-C) but requires a bit more setup.
• Flexibility: Highly flexible in creating custom widgets and UIs from scratch.

React Native

• Integration with Native Code: Easier integration with existing native applications and
code.
• Flexibility: Flexible but often relies on third-party libraries for advanced features.

8. Use Cases and Applications

Flutter

• Notable Applications: Google Ads, Alibaba, Reflectly.


• Best For: Projects needing highly custom UIs, games, and complex animations.

React Native

• Notable Applications: Facebook, Instagram, Skype, Tesla.


• Best For: Projects that benefit from a large library ecosystem and those requiring
integration with existing native apps.

Conclusion

Both Flutter and React Native offer powerful tools for cross-platform mobile development. The
choice between them depends on various factors such as team expertise, project requirements,
and performance needs. Flutter excels in performance and customizability, making it ideal for
high-performance applications with complex UIs. React Native, with its extensive ecosystem and
ease of use for JavaScript developers, is a robust choice for versatile and large-scale applications.

You might also like