Flavanoid 2
Flavanoid 2
net/publication/333559847
CITATIONS READS
10 1,839
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
“Innovation in and sustainability of the agricultural sector in Palestine” Strengthening cooperation between higher education, agribusiness, government, and farmers
View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Jehad Abbadi on 22 June 2019.
Received: 7th Jan, 19; Revised: and Accepted: 20th Feb, 19; Available Online: 25th Mar, 2019
ABSTRACT
An in-vitro evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of pomegranate peel extract from Palestine
were investigated. In parallel, the total phenolic content (TPC) and the total flavonoids content (TFC) were measured.
The antioxidant activities were determined spectrophotometrically by DPPH, FRAP, CUPRAC and the ABTS methods.
The phenolic and flavonoid contents were separated and partially identified using HPLC and LC-MS. In-vitro inhibitory
effect of the extract on production of Interlukin-6 (Il-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) by Lipopolysacaride
(LPS)-induced polymorphonuclear Cells (PMNCs) was evaluated. Pomegranate peel extract was found to have strong
antiinflamatory activity as revealed by the reduction in the levels of IL-6 and TNF-alfa. It was also found that it is rich in
phenoloic and flavonoids that enhanced its reducing activity and free radical scavenging ability.
Keywords: Pomegranate peel, extract, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant activity, Phenolic compounds, flavonoids.
Table 1: Effects of Pomegranate peel extracts and LPS warmed at 37◦C and mixed with 40 µl of the extract and
on PMNCs viability. the reaction mixtures were later incubated at 37◦C.
Contents % Viability Absorbance at 593 nm was read with reference to a
PMNCs only 95.5±1.2 reagent blank containing distilled water which was also
PMNCs with LPS 93.93±1.3 incubated at 37 ◦C for up to 1 hour instead of 4 min,
PMNCs with LPS and 300 µg/ml 90.1±1.0 which was the original time applied in FRAP assay.
Pomegranate peel extract Aqueous solutions of known Fe+2 concentrations in the
range of 2-5 mM were used for calibration, and results
Then, fifty grams of the above-mentioned powder was were expressed as mmol Fe+2 /g.
mixed with 500 ml of 96% Ethanol and kept on a shaker Cupric reducing antioxidant power (CUPRAC assay)
for 5 days. The extract was filtered through filter paper The cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity of the
(Whatman blue ribbon No. 41). The filtrate solution was extracts was determined according to the method of Apak
dried completely under vacuum using rotary evaporator et al. (2008)21. 100 µl of sample extract was mixed with
(BUCHI Brand) at 50°C. 1ml each of 10 mM of cupper chloride solution, 7.5 mM
Chemicals and reagents of neocuproine alcoholic solution (99.9% ethanol), and 1
2,4,6-tripyridyl- S-triazine (TPTZ), hydrochloric acid M (pH 7.0) of ammonium acetate buffer solution, and 1
37% (w/w), sodium hydroxide, ferric chloride trihydrate, ml of distilled water to make final volume 4.1 ml. After
ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, potassium persulphate, 30 min, the absorbance was recorded at 450 nm against
sodium acetate, sodium carbonate, sodium nitrite, the reagent blank. Standard curve was prepared using
aluminum chloride, methanol, folin-ciocalteu reagent, different concentrations of Trolox. The results were
Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2- expressed as µmol Trolox/g.
carboxylic acid), gallic acid, cupper chloride, Free radical scavenging activity using DPPH (DPPH
neocuproine, 99.9% ethanol, ammonium acetate, DPPH, assay)
methanol, ABTS (2,2-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzothialozine- DPPH assay is based on the measurement of the
sulphonic acid)), and potassium persulphate were all scavenging ability of antioxidants towards the stable
obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Germany. All chemicals DPPH radical. A 3.9 mL aliquot of a 0.0634 mM of
and reagents were of analytical grade. The acetonitrile DPPH solution in methanol (95%) was added to 100 µl of
and water solvents were of an HPLC grade from Sigma. each extract. The mixture was vortexed for 5-10 sec. The
Phenolic and flavonoids standards: Vanillic acid, Ferulic change in the absorbance of the sample extract was
acid, Syringic acid, trans-cinnamic acid, Catechin, p- measured at515 nm for 30 min till the absorbance reached
coumaric acid, Sinapic acid, 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid, a steady state. Methanol (95%) was used as a blank.
Rutin hydrate, Caffeic acid, Quercetin, Gallic acid, 3,4- Standard curve was prepared using different
dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, chlorogenic acid, Taxifolin, concentrations of Trolox. The results were expressed as
Luteolin 7-glucoside, Apigenin 7-glucoside, Luteolin, µmol Trolox/g.
Quercetin 3-D-galactose were from Sigma-Aldrich, Free radical scavenging activity using ABTS (ABTS
Germany. assay)
Regents preparation A modified procedure using ABTS (2, 2-azino-di-(3-
FRAP reagent was prepared according to Benzie and ethylbenzothialozine-sulphonic acid)) as described by
Strain (1999)20 by the addition of 2.5 mL of a 10 mM Pellegrini et al. (1999)22 was used. The ABTS stock
tripydyltriazine (TPTZ) solution in 40 mM HCl plus 2.5 solution (7 mM) was prepared through reaction of 7 mM
mL of 20mM FeCl3.6H2O and 25 mL of 0.3M acetate ABTS and 2.45 mM of potassium persulphate as the
buffer at pH 3.6. Acetate buffer (0.3M) was prepared by oxidant agent. The working solution of ABTS+˙ was
dissolving 16.8 g of acetic acid and 0.8g of sodium obtained by diluting the stock solution in 99.9% ethanol
hydroxide in 1000 mL of distilled water. to give an absorption of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm. 200 µl
HPLC and UHPLC Instrumentation systems sample extract was added to 1800 µl of ABTS+˙ solution
The analytical HPLC is Waters Alliance (e2695 and absorbance readings at 734 nm were taken at 30 °C
separations module), equipped with 2998 Photo diode exactly 10 min after initial mixing (A). The radical-
Array (PDA). Data acquisition and control were carried scavenging activity of the test samples was expressed as
out using Empower 3 chromatography data software Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity TEAC (µmol
(Waters, Germany). The chromatography was performed Trolox/g sample).
under reverse phase conditions using a TSQ Quantum Total phenolic content (Folin-Ciocalteau assay)
Access MAX (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) Total phenolics were determined using Folin-Ciocalteau
which includes a Dionex Pump with degasser module, an reagents. Z. spina-christi plant extracts or gallic acid
Accela PDA detector and an Accela Autosampler. standard (40 µl) were mixed with 1.8 mL of Folin-
Measurement of Antioxidant Activity Ciocalteu reagent (prediluted 10-fold with distilled water)
FRAP assay and allowed to stand at room temperature for 5 min, and
The antioxidant activity of the extracts was determined then 1.2 mL of sodium bicarbonate (7.5%, w/v) was
using a modified method of the assay of ferric added to the mixture. After standing for 60 min at room
reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) of Benzie and Strain temperature, absorbance was measured at 765 nm.
(1999)20. Freshly prepared FRAP reagent (3.0 mL) was Aqueous solutions of known gallic acid concentrations in
Table 2: Effect of pomegranate peel extract on production of IL-6 and TNF alpha by PMNCs.
IL6 amount (pg/ml) TNF alpha amount (pg/ml)
Average STD Average STD
Cells only 106.7 1.2 64.3 1.7
Cells with LPS 640.3 2.1 987.3 5.2
Cells with LPS and 75 µ g extract 371 2.9 669 2.9
Cells with LPS and 150 µ g extract 160 2.9 314.3 3.3
Cells with LPS and 300 µ g extract 63.3 1.2 77.7 2.1
Table 3: Total phenolic content (TPC as mg Gallic acid/g DW *), total flavonoids contents (TFC as mg catechin/g
DW), FRAP (mmol Fe+2/g DW), CUPRAC (µmol Trolox/g DW), DPPH (µmol Trolox/g DW), and ABTS (µmol
Trolox/g DW) of pomegranate peel extract.
TPC** (mg/g) TFC (mg/g) FRAP (mmol/g) CUPRAC (µmol/g) DPPH (µmol/g) ABTS (µmol/g)
33.5± 1.5 8.3± 0.9 12.4 ± 0.4 3756 ±35 225 ± 6 46.2 ±1.5
*
DW: Dry weight
**
Results are expressed as an average of three samples.
the range of 10 - 500 mg/L were used for calibration. was maintained at 35°C. The chromatographic separation
Results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents was achieved using the same HPLC linear gradient
(GAE)/ g sample. program using formic acid instead of acetic acid at a
Total flavonoid content constant flow rate of 0.4 mL/min over a total run time of
The determination of total flavonoids was performed 70 min. The samples were detected by a TSQ Quantum
according to the colorimetric assay of Kim et al. (2003) 23. Access Max mass spectrometer using Electron Spray
Distilled water (4 mL) was added to 1 mL of the extract ionization (ESI) and full scan acquisition. Air was
in a test tube. Then, 0.3 mL of 5% sodium nitrite solution produced (SF 2 FF compressor, Atlas Copco, Belgium).
was added, followed by 0.3 mL of 10% aluminum Purified nitrogen was used as source and exhaust gases.
chloride solution. Test tubes were incubated at ambient Samples of the crude extracts were prepared at a
temperature for 5 minutes, and then 2 mL of 1 M sodium concentration of 5 mg/ml by dissolving 50 mg of crude
hydroxide were added to the mixture. Immediately, the extract in 10 ml of respective solvent (water, 80%
volume of reaction mixture was made to 10 mL with ethanol, or 100% ethanol).
distilled water. The mixture was thoroughly mixed using Cell Culture
test tube shaker and the absorbance of the pink color Polymorphonuclear cells were isolated from a freshly
developed was determined at 510 nm. Aqueous solutions transfused 5 ml whole blood. The blood was mixed with
of known catechin concentrations in the range of 50 - 100 an equal amount of phosphate buffered saline (PBs) in a
mg/L were used for calibration and the results were 1:1 ratio in a sterile condition. Three ml of Histopaque
expressed as mg catechin equivalents (CEQ)/ g sample. were pipetted in 15 ml conical tube. The mixture of the
Chromatographic conditions PBS and the blood was added gently to the tube and then
The HPLC analytical experiments of the crude ethanol spun for 20 min at 400 G. The PMNCs were aspirated
extracts were run on ODS column of Waters (XBridge, and then washed 3 times with 10 ml PBS in a 12 ml
4.6 ID x 150 mm, 5 μm) connected to guard column of conical tube at 100 G for 10 minutes. Supernatant was
Xbridge ODS, 20 mm x 4.6mm ID, 5 μm. The mobile discarded and the cells were isolated and used in our
phase is a mixture of 0.5% acetic acid solution (A) and study.
acetonitrile (B) run in a linear gradient mode. A 100% The isolated PMNCs were cultured in Roswell Park
(A) was descended to 70% (A) in 40 minutes then to 40% Memorial Institute (RBMI) medium that was enriched
(A) in 20 minutes and then to 10% (A) in 2 minutes and with 100-μg ml-1 streptomycin, 100 Uml-1 penicillin,
stayed for 6 minutes and back to the initial conditions in 2 and with heat-inactivated 10% Fetal Bovine Serum
minutes. The HPLC system was equilibrated for 5 (FBS). The mixtures were incubated into 12-well tray at
minutes with the initial acidic water mobile phase (100 % 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator for 24 hours. One ml of the
A) before injecting next sample. All the samples were mixture contains 1 million of the cells and was incubated
filtered with a 0.45 m PTFE filter. The PDA in one well. Different concentrations of the pomegranate
wavelengths range was from 210-500 nm. The flow rate extract were added to lipo poly saccharide (1 μg/ well)
was 1 ml/min. Injection volume was 20 l and the stimulated cells.
column temperature was set at 25◦C. Samples were Cytotoxicity Test
filtered through 0.45 m micro porous disposable filter. The trypan blue exclusion test was used to evaluate the
The UHPLC chromatographic separations were run on a cytotoxicity of the pomegranate extract as illustrated by
Kinetex™ (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) through Avelar-Freitas et al. 201414. Trypan blue dye of an acid
C8 column (2.6 µm particle size, 100 Å pore size, 100 x azo exclusion medium was prepared in 0.4 % dilution,
2.1 mm), protected by a SecurityGuard™ (Phenomenex, then mixed with an equal amount of the cell suspension
Torrance, CA, USA) cartridge C8 column (2.1 mm ID). with 300 µ gram/1 ml of the pomegranate extract. After 2
The injection volume was 10 μL, the oven temperature minutes, Hemocytometer was used to count the cells.
27.648
0.35
256.8
353.3353.3
26.251
26.770
221.4
261.5
253.2 261.5 348.5348.5
0.30
265.1 355.7
0.25
25.644
0.20 363.8
AU
477.4488.3492.0
0.15
29.953
24.020
24.530
0.10
23.210
23.588
22.935
22.45522.061
21.50321.732
15.614
34.940
31.653
27.377
20.520
30.685
66.487
0.05
30.993
36.902
20.276
28.991
33.130
28.545
18.913
65.025
14.449
43.350
20.986
18.395
14.868
65.302
64.852
63.820
66.767
0.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00
Minutes
Figure 1: HPLC-PDA chromatograms of crude Pomegranate peel ethanol extract at 350 nm.
255.6255.6255.6
214.3
215.5
215.5
353.3353.3
354.5
352.1
348.5
Figure 2: Overlaid UV-Vis spectra of the major five peaks of Pomegranate peel ethanol extract eluted between 25.64-
29.95 minutes.
Viable cells were unstained and dead cells were stained effect on the viability of the PMNCs when compared with
blue. the control group. Table 1 represents such results. Such
Immunoassay for TNF-alpha and IL-6: results indicate that any possible reduction in the
Enzyme Linked Immunoassay was employed to measure cytokines’ production is not due to the PMNCs death.
IL-6 and TNF-alpha according to manufacturer’s Anti-inflammatory activities of the plant extracts
instructions. LPS-stimulated PMNCs after 24h, TNF-α, and IL-6
Statistical Analysis levels increased significantly. However when it was
The means of TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations were treated with pomegranate peel extracts with
compared using Paired samples t test applying SPSS concentrations ranged from 75-300 µgm/ ml, TNF-α and
version 19. Differences with P less than 0.05 were IL-6 in cell culture medium were all significantly reduced
considered significant. and the greater the reduction in their concentration, the
stronger the anti-inflammatory effect of the extract (Table
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 2). Such results make the pomegranate peel extracts a
Cytotoxicity of the extracts good source candidate for anti-inflammatory drugs.
Pomegranate peel extracts at concentration of 300 µg/ ml Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Total Flavonoid
and LPS at concentration of 1 µg/ ml have no obvious Content (TFC)
Pomegranate peel extract was found to be rich with hydrogen donors including phenolics. The bleaching of
phenolic and flavonoids with TPC and TFC of 33.5 and DPPH solution increases linearly with increasing amount
8.3 mg/g, respectively, Table 3. of extract in a given volume.
Antioxidant activity DPPH antioxidant activity of pomegranate peel extract
There are two types of typical assays used to evaluate the was found to be 225±6 µmole Trolox/g (Table 1).
AA of plant extracts. The first category measures the Free radical scavenging activity using ABTS
potential of plant extracts to reduce ions or oxidants (by A modified procedure using ABTS (2,2-azino-di-(3-
acting as reducing agents) like ferric ion, cupric ion. The ethylbenzothialozine-sulphonic acid) was used. The
main two assays of this category are FRAP (measures the ABTS+˙ stock solution (7 mM) was prepared through
reduction potential of ferric to ferrous ion), and CUPRAC reaction of 7 mM ABTS and 2.45 mM of potassium
(measures the reduction of cupric to cuprous ion). The persulphate as the oxidant agent. The working solution of
second category of AA measures the ability of plant ABTS+˙ was obtained by diluting the stock solution in
extracts to scavenge free radicals. DPPH and ABTS ethanol to give an absorption of 0.70 ± 0.02 at λ = 734
assays (where DPPH and ABTS are stable free radicals) nm. Sample extract (100 μl) was added to 900 μl of
are the two main examples of this category. These assays ABTS+˙ solution and absorbance readings at 734 nm were
are quick and simple, and their reactions are reproducible taken at 30 °C exactly 10 min after initial mixing.
and linearly related to the concentration of the The ABTS assay measures the relative antioxidant ability
antioxidant(s) present. of extracts to scavenge the radical-cation ABTS+.
Reducing potential of plant extracts produced by the oxidation of 2,2'-azinobis-3-
FRAP assay (Ferric reducing-antioxidant power) ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonate.
This method measures the ability of antioxidants to ABTS antioxidant activity of pomegranate peel extract
reduce ferric iron. It is based on the reduction of the was found to be 46.2 ±1.5 µmol Trolox/g (Table 1).
yellow complex of ferric iron and 2,3,5-triphenyl-1,3,4- HPLC-PDA profiles of pomegranate peel extract
triaza-2-azoniacyclopenta-1,4-diene chloride (TPTZ) to Pomegranate peel was extracted in ethanol solvent and
the blue ferrous form by electron-donating substances concentrated. The chromatogram of 10 l extract at 350
(such as phenolic compounds) at low pH. This reduction nm is shown in figure 1 along with overlaid UV-Vis
is monitored by measuring the change in absorption at spectra. The first eluted peaks at 14.45, 14.86 and 15.61
593 nm. Antioxidant assay was conducted by the method share the same wavelength maximum of 226.6 nm and a
developed by (Benzie and Strain 1999). FRAP values can shoulder at 274 nm. The peaks from 18.39 to 24.53
be obtained by comparing the absorption change in the minutes were also shared similar spectral pattern of two
test mixture with those obtained from increasing maxima’s of around 265 nm and 355 nm respectively.
concentrations of Fe2+. Moreover, the UV-Vis spectra of the major eluted peaks
The antioxidant test based on FRAP assay of between 25.64 to 29.95 minutes is shown in figure 2. The
pomegranate peel extract was found to be 12.4 ±0.4 first maximum wavelengths were at 255.6 nm and the
mmol Fe+2/g of dry material. second maxima was between 348-354 nm. These
Cupric reducing antioxidant power (CUPRAC) absorption patterns characteristics are of typical phenolic
Although FRAP antioxidant assay has been very popular and flavonoid compounds.
among researchers, CUPRAC assay is a relatively new Using very similar conditions to the analytical HPLC-
assay (Apak et al. 2008). It utilizes the copper(II)– PDA, a full scan of the ethanol extract was examined
neocuproine [Cu(II)–Nc] reagent as the chromogenic using UHPLC-MS in the positive and negative
oxidizing agent and is based on the cupric reducing electrospray ionization modes between the range of 200-
ability of reducing compounds to cuprous. 1200 Da. Formic acid was used instead of acetic acid at
The antioxidant test based on CUPRAC assay of 0.1% concentration. The MS results revealed the presence
pomegranate peel extract was found to be 3756 ±35 of some phenolic and flavonoids which were previously
µmole Trolox /g of dry material. identified using different spectroscopic methods.
Free radical scavenging ability of plant extracts
Free radical scavenging activity using DPPH CONCLUSIONS
DPPH is a free radical compound and has been widely Pomegranate peel extract is rich in phenolic and
used to test the free radical scavenging ability of various flavonoids contents and presented an excellent DPPH and
samples (Sakanaka et al. 200524. It is a stable free radical ABTS radical scavenging activities. It also showed
with a characteristic absorption at 517 nm that was used excellent reducing abilities as represented by FRAP and
to study the radical-scavenging effects of extracts. As CUPRAC assays. Pomegranate peel extract also showed a
antioxidants donate protons to this radical, the absorption strong reduction in the production of IL-6 and TNF-α
decreases. Antioxidants, on interaction with DPPH, either from the LPS-induced PMNCs, indicating strong
transfer an electron or hydrogen atom to DPPH, thus antiinflammatory effects. Such results make extracts of
neutralizing its free radical character (Naik et al. 2003)25. pomegranate peels promising source of antiinflammatory
The color changed from purple to yellow and the candidates to be used in the pharmacological industry.
absorbance at wavelength 517 nm decreased.
DPPH assay is based on the ability of the stable free REFERENCES
radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl to react with
1. Gbenou J.; Ahounou J.; Akakpo H.; Laleye A.; Yayi 14. Viuda-Martos M, Fernandez-Lopez J, Pérez-Alvarez
E.; Gbaguidi F.; Baba-Moussa L.; Darboux R.; JA. Pomegranate and its many functional components
Dansou P.; Moudachirou M.; Kotchoni S., as related to human health: a review. Compr Rev Food
Phytochemical composition of Cymbopogon citratus Sci F. 2010;9:635–54.
and Eucalyptus citriodora essential oils and their anti- 15. Qabaha K.I. Antimicrobial and free radical
inflammatory and analgesic properties on Wistar rats. scavenging activities of five Palestinian medicinal
Mol Biol Rep 2013, 40 (2), 1127-1134. plants. African journal of traditional, complementary,
2. Rebogile R. Mphahlele, Olaniyi A. Fawole1, and alternative medicines : AJTCAM, 2013. 10, 101-
Nokwanda P. Makunga and Umezuruike L. Opara, 108.
Effect of drying on the bioactive compounds, 16. Avelar-Freitas B. A., Almeida V. G., Pinto M. C. X.,
antioxidant, antibacterial and antityrosinase activities Mourão F. A. G., Massensini A. R., Martins-Filho O. A.,
of pomegranate peel, BMC Complementary and Brito-Melo G. E. A., Trypan blue exclusion assay by
Alternative Medicine BMC series –2016, 16:143. flow cytometry. Brazilian Journal of Medical and
3. Opara UL, Al-Ani MR, Al-Shuaibi YS. Physico- Biological Research, 2014, 47(4), 307-3015.
chemical properties, vitamin C content and 17. Cheng P, Wang T, Li W, et al. Baicalin Alleviates
antimicrobial properties of pomegranate fruit (Punica Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Liver Inflammation in
granatum L.). Food Bioprocess Tech. 2009; 2:315–21. Chicken by Suppressing TLR4-Mediated NF-κB
4. Sreerkumar S, Sithul H, Muraleedharan P, Azeez JM, Pathway. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2017;8:547.
Sreeharshan S. Pomegranate fruit as a rich source of doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00547.
biologically active compounds. BioMed Res Int. 2014. 18. Qabaha K., Abu Ras S., Abbadi J., Al-Rimawi F. anti-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/686921. inflammatory activity of eucalyptus spp. and pistascia
5. Glazer I, Masaphy S, Marciano P, Bar-Ilan I, Holland lentiscus leaf extracts. Afr J Tradit Complement
D, Kerem Z, Amir R. Partial identification of Altern Med. 2016; 13(5): 1–6.
antifungal compounds from punica granatum peel 19. Gbenou J.D.; Ahounou J.F.; Akakpo H.B.; Laleye A.;
extracts. J Agric Food Chem. 2012; 60:4841–8. Yayi E.; Gbaguidi F.;. Baba-Moussa L., Darboux R.,
6. Fawole OA, Makunga NP, Opara UL. Antibacterial, Dansou P., Moudachirou M., Kotchoni S.O.
antioxidant and tyrosinase-inhibition activities of Phytochemical composition of Cymbopogon citratus
pomegranate fruit peel methanolic extract. BMC and Eucalyptus citriodora essential oils and their anti-
Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:200. inflammatory and analgesic properties on Wistar rats.
7. Fawole OA, Opara UL, Chen L. Bioaccessibility of Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40(2): 1127-1134.
total phenolic concentration and antioxidant capacity 20. Benzie I. F., Strain J. J. Ferric reducing/antioxidant
of pomegranate fruit juice and marc after in vitro power assay: Direct measure of total antioxidant
digestion. Acta Hort. 2015;1079:285–90. activity of biological fluids and modified version for
8. Singh R. P., Chidambara Murthy K. N., Jayaprakasha, simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power
G. K. “Studies on the antioxidant activity of and ascorbic acid concentration. Methods in
pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel and seed extracts enzymology, 1999, 299, 15-27.
using in vitromodels,” Journal of Agricultural and 21. Apak R., Güclü K., Özyürek M., Celik S. E.
Food Chemistry, 2002, 50 (1): 81–86. Mechanism of antioxidant capacity assays and the
9. Kulkarni A. P., Mahal H. S., Kapoor S., Aradhya S. CUPRAC (cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity)
M., “In vitro studies on the binding, antioxidant, and assay. Microchimica Acta, 2008, 160(4), 413-419.
cytotoxic action of punicalagin,” Journal of 22. Re R., Pellegrini N., Proteggente A., Pannala A.,
Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2007, 55 (4), 1491– Yang M., Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying
1500. an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization
10. Basu A, Penugonda K. Pomegranate juice: a heart- assay. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237.
healthy fruit juice. Nutr Rev. 2009;67:49–56. 23. Kim DO, Chun OK, Kim YJ, Moon HY, Lee CY.
11. Abdollahzadeh Sh, Mashouf R, Mortazavi H, Quantification of polyphenolics and their antioxidant
Moghaddam M, Roozbahani N, Vahedi M. capacity in fresh plums. J. Agric. Food Chem.2003,
Antibacterial and antifungal activities of punica 516:509-6515.
granatum Peel extracts against oral pathogens. J Dent 24. Sakanaka S., Tachibana Y., Okada Y. Preparation and
(Tehran) 2011;8:1–6. antioxidant properties of extracts of Japanese
12. Lee CJ, Chen LG, Liang WL, Wang CC. Anti- persimmon leaf tea (kakinoha-cha). J. Food
inflammatory effects of Punica granatum Linne in Chem.,2005, 89, 569-575.
vitroand in vivo. Food Chem. 2010;118:315–322. 25. Naik G.H., Priyadarsini K.I., Satav J.G., Banavalikar
13. Parmar HS, Kar A. Antidiabetic potential of Citrus M.M., Sohoni P.P., Biyani, M.K. Comparative
sinensis and Punica granatum peel extracts in alloxan antioxidant activity of individual herbal components
treated male mice. Biofactors. 2007;31:17–24. used in Ayurvedic medicine. J. Phytochem., 2003, 63,
97-104.