Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Reduction Including Lipid Modification PDF 66143902851781
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Reduction Including Lipid Modification PDF 66143902851781
NICE guideline
Published: 14 December 2023
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng238
Your responsibility
The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful
consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals
and practitioners are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the
individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or the people using their service.
It is not mandatory to apply the recommendations, and the guideline does not override the
responsibility to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual, in
consultation with them and their families and carers or guardian.
All problems (adverse events) related to a medicine or medical device used for treatment
or in a procedure should be reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency using the Yellow Card Scheme.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 2 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Contents
Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 5
Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 6
1.1 Identifying and assessing cardiovascular disease risk for people without established
cardiovascular disease ......................................................................................................................... 6
1.3 Lifestyle changes for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease ........ 10
1.4 Initial lipid measurement and referral for specialist review ......................................................... 13
1.8 Statins for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with
chronic kidney disease ......................................................................................................................... 22
1.12 Lipid-lowering treatments that should not be used or not used routinely ............................... 27
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 3 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Context ......................................................................................................................................... 46
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 4 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Overview
This guideline covers identifying and assessing risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in
adults without established CVD. It covers lifestyle changes and lipid-lowering treatment
(including statins) for primary and secondary prevention of CVD, and includes guidance for
people who also have diabetes or chronic kidney disease.
Who is it for?
• Healthcare professionals
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 5 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Recommendations
People have the right to be involved in discussions and make informed decisions
about their care, as described in NICE's information on making decisions about your
care.
Making decisions using NICE guidelines explains how we use words to show the
strength (or certainty) of our recommendations, and has information about
prescribing medicines (including off-label use), professional guidelines, standards
and laws (including on consent and mental capacity), and safeguarding.
1.1.2 Prioritise people based on an estimate of their CVD risk before doing a full formal
risk assessment. Estimate their CVD risk using CVD risk factors already recorded
in primary care electronic medical records. [2008]
1.1.3 Review estimates of CVD risk on an ongoing basis for people over 40. [2008]
1.1.4 Prioritise people for a full formal risk assessment if their estimated 10-year risk of
CVD is 10% or more. [2008, amended 2014]
1.1.5 Discuss the process of risk assessment with the person identified as being at
risk, including the option of declining any formal risk assessment. [2008]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 6 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.1.6 Do not use opportunistic assessment as the main strategy in primary care to
identify CVD risk in unselected people. [2008]
1.1.8 Use the QRISK3 tool for people with type 2 diabetes aged between 25 and 84.
[May 2023]
Until electronic clinical systems in which QRISK2 is embedded are updated with
QRISK3, it may be necessary to use QRISK2.
1.1.9 Do not use a risk assessment tool for people who are at high risk of CVD,
including people with:
• type 1 diabetes (see the section on primary prevention of CVD for people
with type 1 diabetes)
• an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m2
and/or albuminuria (see the section on primary and secondary prevention of
CVD for people with chronic kidney disease [CKD])
1.1.10 Recognise that CVD risk tools may underestimate risk in certain groups of people,
including but not limited to:
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 7 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.1.11 Consider people aged 85 or older to be at increased risk of CVD because of age
alone, particularly people who smoke or have raised blood pressure. [May 2023]
For a short explanation of why the committee made these recommendations and how
they might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on full formal risk
assessment.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review A:
CVD risk assessment tools: primary prevention.
1.1.13 Set aside adequate time during the consultation to provide information on risk
assessment and to answer any questions. Arrange for further consultation if
needed. [2008, amended May 2023]
1.1.14 Document the discussion relating to the consultation on risk assessment and the
person's decision. [2008]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 8 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.1.15 Offer people information about their absolute risk of CVD and the absolute
benefits and harms of any intervention over a 10-year period. [2008]
1.1.16 Consider using a lifetime risk tool such as QRISK3-lifetime to inform discussions
on CVD risk and to motivate lifestyle changes, particularly for people with a
10-year QRISK3 score less than 10%, and people under 40 who have CVD risk
factors. [May 2023]
• find out what, if anything, the person has already been told about their CVD
risk and how they feel about it
• explore the person's beliefs about what determines future health (this may
affect their attitude to changing risk)
• check that they have understood what has been discussed. [2008, amended
2014]
1.1.18 If the person's CVD risk is at a level where treatment is recommended but they
decline the offer of treatment, advise them that their CVD risk should be
reassessed in the future. Record their choice in their medical records. [2008,
amended 2014]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 9 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
For a short explanation of why the committee made the 2023 recommendation and
how it might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on communication
about risk assessment, lifestyle changes and treatment.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review A:
CVD risk assessment tools: primary prevention.
NICE's surveillance team reviewed the evidence about aspirin for the primary
prevention of CVD. Based on the review, NICE decided to add a do not routinely offer
recommendation about this. For full details, see the January 2023 exceptional
surveillance report.
Behaviour change
1.3.1 Advise and support people at high risk of or with CVD to achieve a healthy
lifestyle in line with NICE's guideline on behaviour change: general approaches.
[2014, amended May 2023]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 10 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Healthy eating
For advice on healthy eating, see the NHS eat well guide.
Cardioprotective diet
1.3.2 Advise people at high risk of or with CVD to eat a diet in which total fat intake is
30% or less of total energy intake, saturated fats are 7% or less of total energy
intake, and where possible saturated fats are replaced by mono-unsaturated and
polyunsaturated fats. [May 2023]
• increase their mono-unsaturated fat intake with olive oil, rapeseed oil or
spreads based on these oils and to use them in food preparation. [2014]
For a short explanation of why the committee made the 2023 recommendation and
how it might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on cardioprotective
diet.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review B:
dietary cholesterol strategies.
Physical activity
1.3.5 Advise people at high risk of or with CVD to do aerobic and muscle-strengthening
activities in line with the UK Chief Medical Officers' physical activity guidelines.
[2008, amended 2014]
1.3.6 Encourage people who are unable to perform moderate intensity physical activity
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 11 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.3.7 Advice about physical activity should take into account the person's needs,
preferences and circumstances. Agree goals and provide the person with written
information about the benefits of activity and local opportunities to be active, in
line with recommendation 2 of NICE's guideline on physical activity: brief advice
for adults. [2008]
Weight management
1.3.9 Offer people at high risk of or with CVD who are overweight or obese appropriate
interventions in line with NICE's guideline on obesity: identification, assessment
and management. [2008]
Alcohol consumption
1.3.10 For advice on how to keep the health risks from drinking alcohol to a low level,
see the UK Chief Medical Officer's alcohol consumption guidelines. [2008]
Smoking cessation
1.3.11 Advise and support all people who smoke to stop, in line with the
recommendations on treating tobacco dependence in NICE's guideline on
tobacco. [2008]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 12 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.4.2 Use clinical findings, a full lipid profile and family history to judge the likelihood of
a familial lipid disorder, rather than using strict lipid cut-off values alone. [2014,
amended December 2023]
1.4.5 Arrange for specialist assessment of people with a total blood cholesterol level of
more than 9.0 mmol per litre or a non-HDL cholesterol level of more than 7.5 mmol
per litre even in the absence of a first-degree family history of premature
coronary heart disease. [2014]
1.4.6 Refer for urgent specialist review if a person has a triglyceride level of more than
20 mmol per litre that is not a result of excess alcohol intake or poor glycaemic
control. [2014]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 13 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.4.7 In people with a triglyceride level between 10 mmol and 20 mmol per litre:
• seek specialist advice if the triglyceride level remains at more than 10 mmol
per litre. [2014]
1.4.8 In people with a triglyceride level between 4.5 mmol and 9.9 mmol per litre:
• be aware that the CVD risk may be underestimated by risk assessment tools
and
• seek specialist advice if non-HDL cholesterol level is more than 7.5 mmol per
litre. [2014]
1.5.2 Take into account potential benefits from lifestyle changes, the person's
preferences, the presence of any comorbidities, whether they are on multiple
medications, whether they are frail and their life expectancy. (See also NICE's
guideline on multimorbidity.) [May 2023, amended December 2023]
1.5.3 Advise people who are being offered a statin that the risk of muscle pain,
tenderness or weakness associated with statin use is small and the rate of severe
muscle adverse effects (rhabdomyolysis) because of statins is extremely low.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 14 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
[May 2023]
• that other drugs, some foods (for example, grapefruit juice) and some
supplements may interfere with statins and
• smoking status
• alcohol consumption
• diabetes status
• renal function
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 15 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.5.6 Do not routinely exclude from statin treatment people who have liver
transaminase levels that are raised but are less than 3 times the upper limit of
normal. [May 2023]
1.5.7 Before offering a statin, ask the person if they have had persistent generalised
unexplained muscle symptoms (pain, tenderness or weakness), whether
associated or not with previous lipid-lowering treatment. If they have, measure
creatine kinase levels. If creatine kinase levels are:
• more than 5 times the upper limit of normal, re-measure creatine kinase after
7 days; if creatine kinase levels are still 5 times the upper limit of normal, do
not start statin treatment (see the section on when statins are
contraindicated or not tolerated)
• raised but less than 5 times the upper limit of normal, start statin treatment at
a lower dose. [May 2023]
For a short explanation of why the committee made these recommendations and how
they might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on discussions and
assessment before starting statins.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review C:
statins: efficacy and adverse effects.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 16 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.6.3 Recognise that people may need support to change their lifestyle. To help them
do this, refer them to programmes such as exercise referral schemes or weight
management services. (See NICE's guidelines on behaviour change: individual
approaches, physical activity: exercise referral schemes and weight management:
lifestyle services for overweight or obese adults.) [May 2023]
1.6.4 Offer people the opportunity to have their risk of CVD assessed again after they
have tried to change their lifestyle. [May 2023]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 17 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.6.8 Do not rule out treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg for the primary prevention of
CVD just because the person's 10-year QRISK3 score is less than 10% if they
have an informed preference for taking a statin or there is concern that risk may
be underestimated. [May 2023]
1.6.9 For people aged 85 and older consider treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg. Be
aware of factors that may make treatment inappropriate (see recommendations
1.5.1 and 1.5.2). [May 2023]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 18 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.6.11 Consider statin treatment for the primary prevention of CVD for people aged 18
to 40 with type 1 diabetes, including those who have had diabetes for 10 years or
less. [May 2023, amended December 2023]
1.6.12 When starting treatment with a statin for adults with type 1 diabetes, use
atorvastatin 20 mg. [May 2023]
For a short explanation of why the committee made these recommendations and how
they might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on statins for primary
prevention of CVD.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review C:
statins: efficacy and adverse effects.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 19 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
For a short explanation of why the committee made this recommendation and how it
might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on lipid target for
secondary prevention of CVD.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review D:
escalation of lipid-lowering treatment for secondary prevention of CVD.
As part of the December 2023 update, a new NICE indicator was developed to
support quality improvement in managing cholesterol levels for people with CVD. This
NICE indicator is suitable for inclusion in local and national general practice
measurement frameworks, including those underpinned with financial incentives:
NM252: The percentage of patients with CVD in whom the last recorded LDL
cholesterol level (measured in the preceding 12 months) is 2.0 mmol per litre or less,
or last recorded non-HDL cholesterol level (measured in the preceding 12 months) is
2.6 mmol per litre or less, if LDL cholesterol is not recorded.
Initial treatment
1.7.2 Offer atorvastatin 80 mg to people with CVD, whatever their cholesterol level,
unless the person meets the criteria in recommendation 1.7.3. [May 2023,
amended December 2023]
• the person would prefer to take a lower dose. [May 2023, amended
December 2023]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 20 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.7.4 Do not delay statin treatment for secondary prevention of CVD but discuss
lifestyle changes at the same time if appropriate. [May 2023, amended
December 2023]
1.7.5 If a person has acute coronary syndrome, do not delay statin treatment. Measure
full lipid profile on admission and at 2 to 3 months after starting treatment. [May
2023, amended December 2023]
For a short explanation of why the committee made these recommendations and how
they might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on statins for
secondary prevention of CVD.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review C:
statins: efficacy and adverse effects.
1.7.9 Take into account the person's preferences, the presence of any comorbidities,
whether they are on multiple medications, whether they are frail and their life
expectancy. (See also NICE's guideline on multimorbidity.) [December 2023]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 21 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.7.10 If the person is taking the maximum tolerated dose and intensity of statin but the
lipid target for secondary prevention of CVD is not met (see
recommendation 1.7.1), consider additional lipid-lowering treatments (see NICE's
technology appraisal guidance on alirocumab, evolocumab, ezetimibe and
inclisiran). [December 2023]
1.7.11 Consider ezetimibe in addition to the maximum tolerated intensity and dose of
statin to reduce CVD risk further, even if the lipid target for secondary prevention
of CVD is met (see recommendation 1.7.1). [December 2023]
For a short explanation of why the committee made these recommendations and how
they might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on lipid target for
secondary prevention of CVD.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review D:
escalation of lipid-lowering treatment for secondary prevention of CVD.
1.8.2 If the lipid target for primary or secondary prevention of CVD (see
recommendation 1.6.1 and recommendation 1.7.1) is not met and eGFR is 30 ml per
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 22 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
minute per 1.73 m2 or more, increase the dose of atorvastatin. [May 2023,
amended December 2023]
1.8.3 Agree the use of higher doses with a renal specialist if eGFR is less than 30 ml
per minute per 1.73 m2. [May 2023]
1.9.2 If the person reports adverse effects when taking a high-intensity statin, discuss
the following strategies with them:
• stopping the statin and trying again when the symptoms have resolved to
check if the symptoms are related to the statin
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 23 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.9.3 If a person is not able to tolerate a high-intensity statin, aim to treat with the
maximum tolerated intensity and dose of statin. [2014, amended December
2023]
1.9.4 Advise the person that any statin at any dose reduces CVD risk. [2014, amended
May 2023 and December 2023]
For a short explanation of why the committee made the 2023 recommendation and
how it might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on optimising
treatment for people on statins.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review C:
statins: efficacy and adverse effects.
1.10.2 If the person is taking ezetimibe but the lipid target for secondary prevention is
not met (see recommendation 1.7.1), consider alternative or additional lipid-
lowering treatments (see NICE's technology appraisal guidance on alirocumab,
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 24 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
For a short explanation of why the committee made these recommendations and how
they might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on lipid target for
secondary prevention of CVD.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review D:
escalation of lipid-lowering treatment for secondary prevention of CVD.
1.11.2 Measure liver transaminase at 12 months, but not again unless clinically indicated.
[May 2023, amended December 2023]
1.11.4 If people report muscle pain, tenderness or weakness while taking a statin and
have a creatine kinase level less than 5 times the upper limit of normal, reassure
them that their symptoms are unlikely to be due to the statin and explore other
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 25 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.11.5 Do not measure creatine kinase levels in asymptomatic people who are being
treated with a statin. [May 2023]
Restarting statins
1.11.7 Remind the person to restart the statin if they stopped taking it because of drug
interactions or to treat intercurrent illnesses. [May 2023]
1.11.9 Offer an annual full lipid profile to inform discussions about secondary prevention
of CVD. [May 2023, amended December 2023]
1.11.10 Consider an annual full lipid profile to inform discussions about primary
prevention of CVD. [May 2023, amended December 2023]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 26 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
1.11.12 Discuss with people who are stable on a low-intensity statin or medium-intensity
statin the likely benefits and potential risks of changing to a high-intensity statin
when they have a medication review and agree with the person whether a
change is needed. [May 2023]
For a short explanation of why the committee made these recommendations and how
they might affect practice, see the rationale and impact section on assessing
response to treatment.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review C:
statins: efficacy and adverse effects.
They do not apply to people with familial hypercholesterolaemia. For guidance on using
fibrates, bile acid sequestrants and combination treatment for this population group, follow
the recommendations on drug treatment in NICE's guideline on familial
hypercholesterolaemia.
Fibrates
1.12.2 Do not routinely offer fibrates to prevent CVD. [2014, amended December 2023]
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 27 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Nicotinic acid
1.12.3 Do not offer nicotinic acid (niacin) to prevent CVD. [2014, amended December
2023]
1.12.6 Tell people that there is no evidence that omega 3 fatty acid compounds help to
prevent CVD, except use of icosapent ethyl as described in NICE's technology
appraisal guidance on icosapent ethyl with statin therapy. [2014]
Combination treatment
1.12.7 To prevent CVD, do not offer the combination of a statin with:
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 28 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
High-intensity statin
The following doses for statins are high intensity, based on the percentage reduction in
LDL cholesterol they can produce:
• atorvastatin: 20 mg to 80 mg
• rosuvastatin: 10 mg to 40 mg.
Medium-intensity statin
The following doses for statins are medium intensity, based on the percentage reduction in
LDL cholesterol they can produce:
• atorvastatin: 10 mg
• fluvastatin: 80 mg
• rosuvastatin: 5 mg
• simvastatin: 20 mg to 40 mg.
Low-intensity statin
The following doses for statins are low intensity, based on the percentage reduction in LDL
cholesterol they can produce:
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 29 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
• fluvastatin: 20 mg to 40 mg
• pravastatin: 5 mg to 40 mg
• simvastatin: 10 mg.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 30 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
For a short explanation of why the committee made this recommendation for
research, see the rationale section on statins for primary prevention of CVD.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review C:
statins: efficacy and adverse effects.
For a short explanation of why the committee made this recommendation for
research, see the rationale section on statins for primary prevention of CVD.
Full details of the evidence and the committee's discussion are in evidence review C:
statins: efficacy and adverse effects.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 31 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
A small amount of evidence suggested that the additional fields included in QRISK3 (such
as severe mental illness, regular corticosteroid use and atypical antipsychotic use) enabled
the tool to perform better than QRISK2 at predicting CVD events for people with these risk
factors. Use of QRISK3 should, therefore, result in more people within these groups being
appropriately considered for risk reduction approaches including statin treatment.
It was noted that the group of people with severe mental illness used to develop and
validate QRISK3 included a high proportion of people with severe and moderate
depression. This is reflected in the definition of severe mental illness in QRISK3 but does
not reflect the definition used in electronic clinical systems in primary care. The committee
agreed, informed by their clinical experience and expert opinion, that people with
moderate to severe depression are not considered to have as great an increased risk of
CVD as people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychoses. By using data
that grouped these conditions together, QRISK3 may underestimate CVD risk for people
with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychoses. Despite this the committee
agreed to recommend use of the tool for people with severe mental illness (however
defined), but clinical judgement should inform interpretation.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 32 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
The committee was aware that the NHS Health Check best practice guidance states that
gender should be recorded as reported by the individual. If the individual discloses gender
reassignment, they should be provided with CVD risk calculations based on both genders
and advised to discuss with their GP which calculation is most appropriate for them as an
individual. They agreed that healthcare professionals are expected to follow this guidance
when undertaking formal risk assessments.
An age range is given for QRISK3 because it is only intended for people aged between 25
and 84 years (inclusive).
The committee agreed that the use of a risk tool remains appropriate in people with type 2
diabetes to support shared decision making. They agreed, based on the evidence, that
QRISK3 performed better than QRISK2 for the population as whole and so should be used
for people with type 2 diabetes.
Based on their clinical experience, the committee identified a list of factors for which all
CVD risk tools underestimate risk. They highlighted the importance of using clinical
judgement to interpret risk scores. As risk scores are used to guide decisions about
interventions to prevent CVD, the committee agreed it was particularly important to ensure
people are not incorrectly considered to be at low risk.
The 2014 recommendation to consider people aged 85 and older to be at increased risk of
CVD was retained as the committee agreed with this statement and there are still no tools
for this age group. The committee highlighted it is important that this group be considered
for interventions to prevent CVD even though a formal risk assessment would not be
carried out.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 33 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
The evidence for lifetime risk tools was not considered sufficient to recommend their use
instead of 10-year risk tools. However, the committee agreed they can have value in
communication of risk. See the section on communication about risk assessment, lifestyle
changes and treatment.
Using QRISK3 instead of QRISK2 will require clinical systems to be updated by software
developers for the impact on practice to be minimised. Public Health England issued
guidance in August 2021 on using QRISK3 in NHS health checks and how to deal with the
transition period (responsibility for the NHS Health Check programme has transferred to
the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, but the guidance produced by Public
Health England remains current).
QRISK3 requires some additional clinical information that was not required for QRISK2.
However, if integrated into electronic clinical systems, QRISK3 is not likely to require
additional resources over QRISK2. There may be some implementation costs as healthcare
professionals become familiar with the additional information included in QRISK3 and in
managing the transition period.
Return to recommendations
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 34 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
However, the committee noted that the usefulness of lifetime risk tools is primarily in
communicating risk. They agreed by consensus that lifetime risk tools should be
considered to help inform discussions about risk and motivate lifestyle changes. The
committee highlighted that these tools may underestimate the ongoing benefit of lipid-
lowering treatments as they do not predict risk reduction from taking medicines, and noted
this should be considered when interpreting the results. They agreed lifetime risk
calculation would not be necessary for everyone, but it may be particularly useful for
people with a QRISK3 score less than 10% or under 40s who have CVD risk factors.
The committee agreed that the online calculators for lifetime risk tools such as QRISK-
lifetime were easy to complete and provided some interpretation of the risk scores to aid
discussions, but acknowledged that lifetime risk assessment would not be done for
everyone.
The committee believe that using lifetime risk tools may have a long-term benefit in
encouraging people to participate in lifestyle changes or engage in treatment, if
appropriate. Given this, any additional time costs were considered likely to improve
management of CVD risk and reduce future CVD events.
Return to recommendation
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 35 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Return to recommendation
Cardioprotective diet
Recommendation 1.3.2
Only evidence on dietary cholesterol was in scope for review and therefore the guidance
on total fat intake and proportion of saturated fat versus unsaturated fat was not changed.
Return to recommendation
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 36 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
The committee agreed to strengthen the recommendation to reassure people that the risk
of these adverse effects occurring is low.
The evidence supported the other 2014 recommendations, so they were retained. The
committee agreed a full lipid profile should be provided before starting statins and
amended the recommendation on lipid measures accordingly. See the section on
assessing response to treatment for further details.
Return to recommendations
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 37 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
The committee agreed to retain 20 mg as the recommended starting dose for all people
starting atorvastatin for primary prevention of CVD. Although there was committee
consensus that higher doses have a greater effect, they agreed that starting at the lowest
effective dose was likely to be preferable to people, but that up-titration of the dose
should be considered as appropriate, following recommendation 1.9.1.
The evidence supported the 2014 recommendations on optimising lifestyle changes and
treating comorbidities and secondary causes of dyslipidaemia before starting statins, so
they were retained.
The committee agreed to retain the following recommendations for research because
there is still a lack of direct evidence in these areas:
Evidence showed that statins are cost effective for people with 10-year CVD risk scores
less than 10%.
The committee agreed that if more people took statins there would be a greater reduction
in CVD events. However, they also recognised that practical considerations needed to be
taken into account.
They agreed that risk scores are an important aid to shared decision making on statins.
National audit data (CVDPREVENT) suggests that 60% of people without CVD and a QRISK
score of 20% or more are prescribed lipid-lowering treatment, compared with 50% for
people with scores of 10% or more. Therefore, the committee consensus was that an even
smaller proportion of people with scores less than 10% may choose to take statins.
The committee agreed that focusing on increasing uptake among people with the most
potential to benefit would have more impact than lowering the statin treatment threshold.
The 10% 10-year QRISK score was therefore retained as the threshold for offering statins.
Although QRISK3 is specified in the recommendations, it is acknowledged that QRISK2
may be used in some circumstances until QRISK3 is embedded in electronic clinical
systems (see the panel after recommendation 1.1.8 for details). The 10% threshold applies
whether QRISK2 or 3 is used.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 38 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Despite this, the committee agreed that a more person-centred approach should be
adopted and recommended atorvastatin 20 mg as an option for people who want to take
statins, irrespective of their QRISK3 score, or where clinical judgement suggests the
person may be at high risk of CVD (for example, if the person has CVD risk factors not
covered by QRISK3).
National audit data suggests that about half of people with a QRISK score of 10% or more
are on lipid-lowering treatment. It is unclear if people are not being offered treatment or if
they are declining or stopping treatment.
Return to recommendations
The evidence supported the 2014 recommendations on initial treatment with statins and
so they were retained. The recommendation on acute coronary syndromes was amended
to clarify that a full lipid profile is needed on admission to hospital and 2 to 3 months after
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 39 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
starting treatment. See the section on assessing response to treatment for further details.
Return to recommendations
Return to recommendation
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 40 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Lipid target
The committee agreed LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol levels should be reduced
as much as possible in people with CVD. However, people respond differently to statins
and other lipid-lowering treatments, and it is not cost effective to offer the full range of
treatments to everyone with CVD.
The clinical evidence consisted of 34 randomised control trials (RCTs). Clinically significant
reductions in LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol levels compared to placebo were
seen for all 4 lipid-lowering treatments covered by the clinical trials: alirocumab,
evolocumab, ezetimibe and inclisiran. The majority of people in the trials were also taking
statins.
Modest reductions in major CVD events such as myocardial infarction, stroke and related
deaths were also seen for all 4 medicines. The committee recognised that some of the
trials involved short follow-up periods of 1 year or less, so these medicines are likely to
have a bigger impact on CVD events over the long term. There was no clinically important
increased risk of adverse events. Injection site reactions were more frequent with
alirocumab, evolocumab and inclisiran than with placebo but these were mild and not
persistent.
The model estimated the absolute LDL cholesterol target at which it was cost effective to
escalate treatment for people on a high-intensity statin. The analysis explored different
combinations of lipid-lowering treatments.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 41 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Escalation of treatment was cost effective for people on statins with LDL cholesterol levels
of more than 2.2 mmol per litre. There was a little more uncertainty about the cost
effectiveness of escalating treatment for people with LDL cholesterol levels between
2.0 mmol and 2.2 mmol per litre. An LDL cholesterol target of 1.8 mmol per litre was not
cost effective. The committee decided that 2.0 mmol per litre was likely to be cost
effective and would allow more people to be treated than 2.2 mmol per litre.
Even though the main economic analysis was based on the impact of lipid-lowering
treatment on LDL cholesterol levels, the committee recognised the need to identify a non-
HDL cholesterol target for use when LDL cholesterol levels have not been requested or
calculated.
Using the distribution of LDL cholesterol levels for the population with CVD and on a statin
in the clinical practice research datalink (CPRD) dataset, 42% of people had LDL
cholesterol levels of 2.0 mmol per litre or more. Using the same data, the threshold for
non-HDL cholesterol that would produce an identical number of people being escalated for
treatment was 2.6 mmol per litre. An alternative approach would be to use the Friedewald
equation and insert the mean triglyceride level of 1.4 mmol per litre along with the LDL
cholesterol of 2.0 mmol per litre. This approach also indicates a non-HDL cholesterol
target of 2.6 mmol per litre.
Both target measures are slightly higher than other national and international targets
because, unlike other targets, the LDL cholesterol target is based on the cost
effectiveness of treatment escalation. However, the committee thought it was sufficiently
similar and, because it was more affordable, was more likely to be implemented.
In a separate analysis, escalation with statin plus ezetimbe (but no injectable treatment)
was evaluated at different LDL cholesterol levels. Ezetimibe was cost effective regardless
of LDL cholesterol, so the committee agreed that it could be considered for people with
lipid levels below the agreed target. They noted that the trade-off between further
reducing risk and increasing medication should be taken into account. These should be
considered and fully discussed with the person as part of informed shared decision
making. Furthermore, the committee agreed that adherence may be lower for people on 2
pills rather than 1, especially if they are below the target.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 42 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
The committee did not review the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of lipid-lowering
treatments in people who are statin intolerant or for whom statins are contraindicated but
based their recommendations on NICE's technology appraisal guidance on alirocumab,
bempedoic acid, evolocumab, ezetimibe and inclisiran.
The committee emphasised that statin treatment is known to be the most effective
method of reducing the risk of CVD events and that this should be the main treatment for
most people. They highlighted the importance of reviewing statin medication in response
to adverse effects before deciding someone is statin intolerant.
An economic analysis estimated the absolute LDL cholesterol target at which it was cost
effective to escalate treatment for people on ezetimibe who are statin intolerant. The
analysis explored different combinations of lipid-lowering treatments.
The committee discussed whether the lipid target should be different because of the
different treatment options and associated costs. However, it was noted that this may
introduce inequality regarding access to lipid-lowering treatment. Also, the target at which
escalation of lipid-lowering treatment is cost effective did not change when the statin
intolerant population was included in the economic model alongside the statin tolerant
population, largely because the prevalence of statin intolerance is relatively low. Therefore,
the committee agreed that the target for people who cannot take statins should be the
same as for those who can take them.
They recommended offering ezetimibe to people who cannot take statins (in line with
NICE's technology appraisal guidance on ezetimibe) and, if this does not achieve the lipid
target in this guideline, to offer alternative or additional lipid-lowering treatments (in line
with other technology appraisal guidance).
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 43 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Increased uptake of statins, ezetimibe and other lipid-lowering treatments will result in
higher medication and monitoring costs to the NHS. It will also contribute to an increased
workload in primary care, including for GP practices and pharmacies, and in laboratories
that process lipid profile and liver function tests. The committee agreed that increased
uptake of lipid-lowering treatments is necessary for an overall improvement in population
health, but that the extra cost of lipid-lowering treatment would be partly offset by savings
due to a reduction in CVD events (including hospital admissions for stroke, heart disease
and cardiovascular procedures).
Return to recommendations
They agreed that blood tests should provide a full lipid profile and that LDL cholesterol
levels can be calculated rather than measured directly. They recommended that a full lipid
profile should be done to inform annual medication reviews about secondary prevention of
CVD, and considered for reviews about primary prevention of CVD.
These changes were also applied to the recommendations on baseline blood tests before
starting statins and statin treatment after an acute coronary syndrome.
The evidence supported the 2008 and 2014 recommendations on when to measure
creatine kinase, not stopping statins because of an increase in blood glucose or HbA1c and
restarting statins if stopped because of drug interactions or illness, so they were retained.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 44 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Return to recommendations
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 45 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Context
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for
almost 18 million deaths each year (over 30% of all global deaths). Around 7 million people
in the UK have CVD.
Over 70 million prescriptions for statins are dispensed in England each year, costing the
NHS around £100 million. The total healthcare cost of CVD in England is estimated to be
£7.4 billion.
Despite the weight of conclusive research and consistent national and international
guidelines, many people at significant risk of CVD do not receive lipid-lowering treatment,
or they receive inadequate treatment. Anxieties about the safety of statins may mean
healthcare professionals are reticent about offering them, and people are reluctant to start
or continue statin treatment. Depending on statin intensity, 30% to 50% of people stop
taking statins within 6 years.
Over the past 5 years, more evidence has become available on the benefits and adverse
effects of statins.
Ways to estimate and explain CVD risk have also improved, and healthcare professionals
now have more varied and accurate approaches available for individualised risk
assessment. This can empower patients and professionals to discuss interventions to
reduce short-term and long-term CVD risk.
Increasing awareness of elevated lipids (including cholesterol) as a risk factor for CVD, so
that appropriate intervention can be provided, is critical to the delivery of the NHS Long
Term Plan. By 2029, the ambition in England is for at least 45% of people aged 40 to 74
with a 20% or greater risk of developing CVD in the next 10 years to be on appropriate
lipid-lowering treatment. Local achievement of this ambition can be monitored using the
CVDPREVENT audit.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 46 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
For full details of the evidence and the guideline committee's discussions, see the
evidence reviews. You can also find information about how the guideline was developed,
including details of the committee.
NICE has produced tools and resources to help you put this guideline into practice. For
general help and advice on putting our guidelines into practice, see resources to help you
put NICE guidance into practice.
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 47 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification
(NG238)
Update information
December 2023: This guideline updates and replaces NICE guideline CG181 (July 2014).
We reviewed the evidence and made a new recommendation on the target lipid level for
secondary prevention of CVD for adults on lipid-lowering treatment. New
recommendations are marked [December 2023]. We also restructured the guideline to
provide better navigation. Some of the existing recommendations have been amended to
be consistent with the new recommendations or for clarification because of the
restructure.
May 2023: We reviewed the evidence and made new recommendations on risk
assessment tools for primary prevention of CVD, cardioprotective diets and statin
treatment for primary prevention of CVD. Recommendations for chronic kidney disease
and initial treatment with statins for secondary prevention of CVD were not changed.
July 2014: This guideline updates and replaces NICE guideline CG67 and NICE technology
appraisal guidance 94.
ISBN: 978-1-4731-5636-4
Accreditation
© NICE 2024. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and- Page 48 of
conditions#notice-of-rights). 48