Modern Approaches To Sustainable Agriculture
Modern Approaches To Sustainable Agriculture
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
Modern Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture
Sadiq Sani1; Abubakar Ibrahim Abdulkadir 2; Nasif Abdullahi3; Kabiru Musa Abubakar 4; Abdullahi Abdul5; Abdullahi Lawal Umar 6
1, 2,3,4,5 & 6
Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, Mewar University, Gangrar-312901, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, India.
Corresponding Author; Sadiq Sani
Abstract:- The global population is increasing at an hindering crop production and formulate strategies using
alarming rate, presenting a formidable challenge in available resources and technologies (Pretty et al., 2018;
meeting the escalating demand for food. This concern has Tilman et al., 2011). Sustainable agricultural approaches and
garnered the attention of agrarian scientists and practices offer solutions for producing food and agricultural
policymakers worldwide. The present population's rapid products with minimal environmental impact, ensuring food
utilization of natural resources raises apprehensions about accessibility and availability without compromising the well-
compromising the entitlement of future generations to being of future generations (Garnett et al., 2013). Defined as
access nutritious food and clean air. The multifaceted an integrated system of plant and animal production practices,
causes of this challenge can be delineated, with a sustainable agriculture aims to satisfy human food and fiber
prominent factor identified as the deficient or suboptimal needs, enhance environmental quality, sustain the economic
implementation of innovative approaches and practices for viability of farm operations, and improve the overall quality of
sustainable agriculture. These contemporary strategies life for farmers and society (Gold, 2007). It can also be
encompass climate-smart agriculture (CSA), precision conceptualized as an agricultural system that meets present
farming, sustainable intensification, biodynamic needs without compromising the ability of contemporary or
agriculture, regenerative agriculture, organic farming, future generations to meet their needs, based on an
agroecology, integrated nutrient management (INM), understanding of ecosystem services (Kremen & Miles, 2012;
integrated pest management, conservation agriculture, Robertson & Swinton, 2005). The discourse on sustainability
aquaponics, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and big in agriculture involves constant debate, encompassing
data analytics. It discusses the potential of these ecocentric and anthropocentric approaches. These alternatives
approaches to enhance resource efficiency, optimize yield, present two distinctive perspectives: the ecocentric approach,
minimize environmental impact, and address challenges focusing on organic and biodynamic farming techniques to
related to food security and climate change resilience. modify consumption patterns, resource allocation, and use
Empirical evidence supports the assertion that the (Altieri, 1999; Pimentel et al., 2005); and the technocentric
adoption of these approaches and practices serves as a approach, involving technology, planning, and lifestyle as
safeguard for agricultural sustainability. integral components of a holistic examination of sustainable
development (Pretty, 1995). A comprehensive and
Keywords:- Sustainable Agriculture, Modern Approaches, interdisciplinary approach to sustainable development
Climate Smart Agriculture, Precision Farming, Aquaponics, integrates all these factors (Conway, 1997). Within the
Biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data Analytics. technocentric approach, sustainability is posited to be
achievable through various scenarios, from state-led industrial
I. INTRODUCTION system modifications to biotechnological solutions addressing
increasing food demands (Tilman et al., 2002; Godfray et al.,
As the global population continues to escalate 2010). These viewpoints distinguish between technocentric
exponentially, addressing the rising demand for agricultural and ecocentric methods, further divided into technocentric
products necessitates heightened efforts toward sustainable abundance and technocentric accommodation, relying on
proliferation (United Nations, 2017; FAO, 2020). This technological advancements to resolve food scarcity issues
imperative extends to enhancing the global food supply, (Dryzek, 1997). The latter involves communitarian ecocentric
curbing food losses, and ensuring access to nutritious food for and radical ecocentric subtypes, aiming for a balanced co-
those facing starvation and malnutrition (Godfray et al., 2010). evolution between the social structure and the ecosystem
The pressing need for global agriculture is to become more (Taylor, 2002). Sustainable agriculture is intricately linked to
productive and efficient to meet the demands of an estimated food security, encompassing various aspects such as food
8.5 billion people by 2030, 9.7 billion by 2050, and a availability, access, nutritional sufficiency, safety, and
projected peak of approximately 10.4 billion during the 2080s economic stability (FAO, 2012). To address the long-term
(UN DESA, 2019; FAO, 2018). Achieving sustainability in challenge of food security, modern sustainable agricultural
annual food resources is paramount to avoiding a severe approaches and practices should be universally adopted and
economic crisis and potential food shortages, compelling applied across all scales of agricultural production. This
agricultural scientists and stakeholders to investigate barriers article, under the umbrella of sustainable agriculture, seeks to
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2298
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
scrutinize and spotlight various unique approaches relevant to international and domestic agricultural and climate change
all stakeholders. policy agendas (FAO, 2013). The three main goals of CSA are
to sustainably boost food security, build resilience and adapt
II. MODERN APPROACHES TO SUSTAINABLE to climate change, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions
AGRICULTURE compared to business-as-usual scenarios (FAO, 2010). CSA
can effectively improve soil-water storage and grain yield of
Examining and evaluating established approaches maize crops, and significantly enhance profit efficiency in
designed to enhance agricultural sustainability, particularly maize production (Partey et al., 2018; Tesfaye et al., 2015).
those emphasizing ecosystem considerations, is crucial. These Overall, CSA serves as a framework for improving food
approaches, exemplified by principles with environmental, security, rural livelihoods, and climate change adaptation,
economic, and social objectives, have evolved over time either although there is a need for further research and extension to
as methodological approaches (e.g., agroecology or ensure long-term food and nutrition security (FAO, 2010). The
sustainable intensification) or were prioritized in policy selection of CSA for sustainability is based on three main
agendas from inception (e.g., carbon farming) (Bonaudo et al., objectives: increasing adaptation, decreasing greenhouse gas
2014; Pretty et al., 2018). These agricultural sustainability emissions below business-as-usual levels, and sustainably
strategies demonstrate adaptability to various production increasing production and profitability.
methods and conditions, encompassing the entire farm/system
in their design. They often come with professional B. Organic farming
endorsements and, in some instances, a market label, as seen Organic farming is a sustainable agricultural approach
in organic farming. Despite differences in scope, ranging from that emphasizes environmental protection, animal welfare,
more overarching approaches like agroecology or sustainable food quality and safety, resource sustainability, and social
intensification to more focused ones such as permaculture or justice (Rigby & Cáceres, 2001). A contemporary definition of
high nature value farming, they share a commonality— organic farming aims to create integrated, humane, and
providing farm owners with options that significantly economically sustainable production systems that rely on
influence long-term farm management (Wezel et al., 2009; renewable resources and manage ecological and biological
Garnett et al., 2013). processes to achieve acceptable levels of nutrition and
economic returns (Lampkin, 1994). The popularity of organic
A. Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) farming has surged due to growing concerns about the adverse
Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) is a strategic approach impacts of chemical inputs in conventional agriculture
designed to enhance Agricultural Management within the (Liebman & Davis, 2009). Consumers' preference for organic
context of climate change, focusing on sustainability (Lipper products is aligned with a global trend towards a "return to
et al., 2014; FAO, 2013). This approach involves the nature" lifestyle, driven by beliefs in the safety and health
introduction of new agricultural technologies and practices benefits of natural products (Schleenbecker & Hamm, 2013).
aimed at boosting production, adapting to climate change, and Despite significant global interest, organic agriculture
mitigating its impacts by reducing greenhouse gas emissions represented only 1.5 percent of total agricultural land as of
(FAO, 2010). CSA, which was established in 2009, has 2018, actively implemented in over 186 countries (Willer &
evolved through various inputs and interactions to provide Lernoud, 2019). Organic farming is recognized as an efficient
internationally applicable concepts for managing agriculture and promising agricultural practice that produces consistent
for food security in a changing climate (Lipper et al., 2014). yields, improves soil health, and addresses environmental
CSA encompasses agricultural methods that simultaneously concerns without the use of synthetic fertilizers (Seufert,
enhance production, adaptability, and mitigation of Ramankutty, & Foley, 2012). Environmental health is a
greenhouse gas emissions, while contributing to food security primary focus in organic farming, contributing to reduced soil,
and development initiatives (Campbell et al., 2014). water, and air pollution. It serves as a natural instrument for
Adaptation under CSA involves reducing exposure to short- biodiversity protection and agricultural sustainability
term hazards and increasing resilience to longer-term (Bengtsson, Ahnström, & Weibull, 2005). Organic farming
challenges while preserving ecological systems (Scherr et al., also has significant social implications, particularly for small
2012; Campbell et al., 2014). Mitigation goals include farmers in rural areas. It enhances soil and ecosystem health
reducing greenhouse gas emissions by managing soils and by reducing chemical inputs and reusing agricultural waste
plants to act as carbon sinks (Campbell et al., 2014). (Altieri, 1995). The practice is gaining popularity due to
Furthermore, CSA aims to improve agricultural techniques increased awareness of health, food quality, and
and approaches to enhance productivity, earnings, and food environmental concerns (Altieri, 1999; Pimentel et al., 2005).
and nutritional security while minimizing environmental Five major features characterize organic agriculture: respect
impact (Lipper et al., 2014). Sustainable intensification is a for the environment and animals, sustainable cropping
key component of CSA, which seeks to maximize natural methods, non-chemical fertilizers and pest control, production
resource utilization and enhance agricultural productivity of high-quality food, and avoidance of genetically modified
(Pretty et al., 2011). CSA has garnered attention in both crops (IFOAM, 2005). It ensures food security through
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2299
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
environmentally sound practices with low external inputs D. Sustainable Intensification
(Parrott & Marsden, 2002). Organic agriculture employs Agricultural intensification is essential to meet the
various strategies to boost output without relying on external demands of a growing human population, aiming to increase
agricultural inputs, particularly chemicals. It focuses on soil resource utilization efficiency while minimizing
fertility control, crop and livestock management, and nutrient environmental impact (Pretty et al., 2011). Sustainable
efficiency, thereby producing healthy food while maintaining intensification (SI) focuses on boosting agricultural production
a balanced ecosystem (Gomiero, Pimentel, & Paoletti, 2011). without harming the environment or converting more non-
Organic farming is an effective and socially accepted agricultural land (Godfray et al., 2010; Garnett et al., 2013). It
approach, meeting the growing consumer demand for health- involves strategies aimed at producing more food while
conscious and environmentally friendly products, and preserving ecosystem services and building resilience to
presenting opportunities for farmers in the market (Rigby & climate change (Pretty et al., 2011; Garnett et al., 2013).
Cáceres, 2001). Intensification typically means producing more per unit of
input, but this can lead to diminishing returns if not balanced
C. Biodynamic Agriculture with the optimization of other inputs (Godfray et al., 2010;
Biodynamic agriculture, established in 1924 by Rudolf Tilman et al., 2011). Sustainable intensification addresses this
Steiner, integrates organic farming practices with by improving efficiency across all inputs and considering
metaphysical principles to foster symbiotic relationships trade-offs before intensification (Pretty et al., 2011). Practices
between cultivators and their soil (Paull, 2011; Carpenter- such as soil and water management, biodiversity enhancement,
Boggs et al., 2000). While it shares similarities with organic and more efficient land use contribute to sustainable
farming, biodynamic agriculture uniquely emphasizes natural intensification while reducing environmental impact (Tilman
rhythms, such as solar and lunar movements, to optimize et al., 2011; Pretty et al., 2011; Garnett et al., 2013).
cultivation and harvest timing (Koepf, 1989; Turinek et al.,
2009). This holistic approach considers interconnected By combining and synergizing existing solutions,
systems and aims to heal the planet by promoting healthier sustainable intensification addresses multiple societal issues
plants and restoring vitality to the soil and livestock while promoting environmental sustainability (Pretty et al.,
(Carpenter-Boggs et al., 2000; Turinek et al., 2009). 2011; Godfray et al., 2010). It has become increasingly
Biodynamic agriculture avoids synthetic inputs and provides important as environmental policies gain prominence, offering
psychological support to farmers, making it one of the most a promising future for production systems that provide
sustainable and environmentally conscious farming practices, multiple societal benefits (Tilman et al., 2011; Garnett et al.,
suitable for all climate zones (Koepf, 1989; Turinek et al., 2013; Pretty et al., 2011). Agricultural intensification
2009). Its primary goal is to achieve sustainable agricultural improves farmers' livelihoods, economic conditions, food
production by combining natural and ecological perspectives security, and employment opportunities for current and future
with celestial influences (Paull, 2011; Turinek et al., 2009). generations, making it a viable choice for improved living
This approach focuses on farming, food, and horticulture, conditions in many countries (Godfray et al., 2010; Pretty et
aiming to restore ecological balance and organic harmony to al., 2011). Sustainable intensification offers a comprehensive
farm or garden environments (Paull, 2011; Reganold, 1995; approach to balance environmental, economic, and social
Turinek et al., 2009). The demand for biodynamic products is goals in agriculture, making it a superior solution for
increasing, especially in Europe, with 202,000 hectares sustainable agriculture overall (Pretty et al., 2011).
dedicated to biodynamic agriculture as of 2019 (Willer &
Lernoud, 2019). The "Demeter" brand is globally recognized E. Regenerative Agriculture
for promoting biodynamic products, adhering to strict Regenerative agriculture emphasizes the preservation
certification standards that ensure quality and holistic practices and rehabilitation of food and farming systems through the
(Willer & Lernoud, 2019; Paull, 2011). Despite initial regeneration of topsoil, improvement of biodiversity,
skepticism, biodynamic agriculture has gained scientific enhancement of water cycles, and overall ecosystem health
recognition as a viable alternative for long-term agricultural (LaCanne & Lundgren, 2018). It integrates various sustainable
sustainability (Reganold, 1995). Biodynamic farming aims to agriculture practices such as permaculture, agroecology,
enhance soil, animal, food, and human health, viewing the agroforestry, and holistic management, and utilizes techniques
farm as a self-sustaining ecosystem influenced by lunar and like recycling agricultural waste and adopting "no-till" or
planetary cycles (Carpenter-Boggs et al., 2000). By improving "reduced till" practices (Elevitch et al., 2018; Newton et al.,
soil quality, product quantity and nutritional value, and insect 2020). Advocates of regenerative agriculture assert that it can
control, biodynamic agriculture is considered a potential yield significant environmental and social benefits, including
pathway to integrated and sustainable agriculture (Paull, the potential to mitigate climate change by restoring soil
2011). health and enhancing agricultural productivity (Lal, 2020;
Montgomery, 2017). However, the lack of a universally
accepted definition leads to variability in its interpretation and
application (Schreefel et al., 2020; Rhodes, 2017). The
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2300
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
primary objective of regenerative agriculture is to enhance soil conditions, soil properties, and nutritional needs (FAO, 2010;
health, which positively impacts water quality, vegetation, and Röling & Wagemakers, 2000).
land productivity (LaCanne & Lundgren, 2018). Adopting
regenerative practices can increase soil organic carbon, G. Precision Farming
improve soil structure and fertility, enhance water retention, Precision agriculture (PA), also referred to as satellite
and mitigate flood and drought risks (Lal, 2020; Newton et al., farming or site-specific crop management (SSCM), represents
2020). Regenerative agriculture is also considered a pivotal an advanced farming methodology focused on identifying,
strategy for sustainable urban food production, particularly measuring, and responding to crop variability within and
when combined with regenerative technologies (Rhodes, between fields (Blackmore et al., 2013; Gebbers &
2017; Altieri et al., 2017). This approach aims to improve soil Adamchuk, 2010). The primary goal of precision farming is to
quality and biodiversity while producing profitable, healthy develop decision support systems (DSS) for whole-farm
agricultural goods through minimized tillage, increased crop management, optimizing input returns while conserving
diversity, and integrated livestock and crop management resources (Sudduth & Kitchen, 2005). This methodology
(Elevitch et al., 2018; Schreefel et al., 2020). It extends employs high-tech sensors and analysis tools to improve crop
beyond sustainability by focusing on regenerating soil and yields and management decisions. Site-specific management
collaborating with natural systems to create a healthier food (SSM) within precision agriculture involves executing
system for people, animals, and the environment appropriate actions at precise times and locations, a concept
(Montgomery, 2017). rooted in agricultural practices but revitalized by the
integration of information technology in precision farming
F. Integrated Farming (Basso & Antle, 2020). Technologies such as variable rate
The concept of the Integrated Farming System (IFS) application (VRA), yield monitors, and remote sensing enable
represents a holistic approach to agriculture, integrating the customization of input utilization to achieve desired
livestock, crops, and aquaculture in an interconnected network outcomes (Peng et al., 2020). This customization is facilitated
where the waste from one component serves as input for by the availability of GPS and GNSS, allowing for precise
another, thereby reducing costs and improving overall geographical variability mapping (Chen et al., 2019).
productivity (Dixon et al., 2001; Singh et al., 2011). IFS aims Precision agriculture extensively utilizes data and information
to emulate natural processes by combining various elements to enhance agricultural resource efficiency, yields, and crop
like plants, animals, birds, fish, and other aquatic life with quality (Liu et al., 2019). By combining technology with
crops to enhance biological diversity (Röling & Wagemakers, agronomic principles, precision farming manages spatial and
2000). Techniques such as mixed cropping, crop rotation, crop temporal variations in all elements of agricultural production
combination, intercropping, and ecologically friendly practices (Gebbers & Adamchuk, 2010). This approach aims to improve
are employed to minimize competition for resources like crop performance and environmental quality while promoting
water, nutrients, and space (Pretty, 2008; Singh et al., 2011). sustainability through optimized utilization of essential inputs
A multi-story architecture is utilized to optimize space usage such as land, water, fuel, fertilizer, and pesticides (Blackmore
and foster interactions between biotic and abiotic components, et al., 2013; Sudduth & Kitchen, 2005). Despite initial capital
enhancing overall diversity (Pretty, 2008). Integrated farming costs and challenges related to data collection, precision
is viewed as a long-term strategy to boost agricultural agriculture offers various benefits such as higher yields,
production through crop diversification, resource integration, reduced fertilizer and pesticide usage, fuel savings, and
and market linkage, particularly benefiting small-family improved water management (Peng et al., 2020). These
farmers in resource-poor regions of Asia and Africa (FAO, advantages contribute to a healthier ecosystem and underscore
2010; Sanginga & Woomer, 2009). Developing a well- the need for supportive legislation and technological
integrated farm with strong market connections requires advancements to optimize precision farming implementation
several years, but the benefits include optimized cropping (Liu et al., 2019).
patterns, recycling farm waste for productive purposes, and
integrating various agricultural enterprises based on agro- H. Agroforestry
climatic and socio-economic conditions (Röling & Agroforestry, characterized by the intentional integration
Wagemakers, 2000; FAO, 2010). The adoption of integrated of agricultural and forestry land-use systems, offers numerous
farming systems faces challenges such as farmers' lack of benefits contributing to the long-term sustainability of
understanding, limited technological capabilities, and agroecosystems (Nair, 2012; Jose, 2009). This practice
inadequate financial support (Dixon et al., 2001). Government addresses land stewardship demands by converting degraded
support is essential for successful implementation, providing land, conserving sensitive areas, and diversifying farm
farmers with the necessary resources and knowledge to adopt production systems (Jose, 2009). When coupled with
IFS (Pretty, 2008; Sanginga & Woomer, 2009). Integrated ecologically oriented land management, agroforestry methods
farming is recognized as a crucial tool for long-term farming aid in preserving ecosystem diversity and processes, thereby
and food security, addressing present and future climatic promoting sustainability and environmental quality (Nair,
2012; Garrity et al., 2010). The economic, environmental, and
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2301
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
social implications of agroforestry are substantial, especially resource usage across a cropping system or rotation,
in the context of modern agriculture facing environmental encouraging farmers to adopt environmentally friendly
challenges (Montagnini & Nair, 2004). As part of ecologically practices with a long-term perspective (Sharma et al., 2018).
oriented land management, agroforestry significantly Overall, INM contributes to maintaining economic yields over
contributes to ecosystem diversification and processes crucial an extended period with minimal impact on native soil fertility
for long-term sustainability (Nair, 2012; Garrity et al., 2010). and pollution, raising farmer awareness of environmentally
It serves as a bridge between agriculture and forestry, creating friendly techniques like organic farming (Thompson et al.,
integrated systems that address both environmental and 2015; Bhattacharya et al., 2017).
economic goals, aiding agricultural adaptation to climate
change and mitigating its consequences (Jose, 2009; Nair, J. Integrated Pest Management
2012; Garrity et al., 2010). Agroforestry systems effectively Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a well-established
protect against wind and water erosion, provide habitats for concept in pest management, evolving to transform pest
diverse flora and fauna, and contribute to the maintenance and control practices in the modern era (Birkett et al., 2018; Gurr
improvement of annual plant yields (Montagnini & Nair, et al., 2017). The new IPM model emphasizes a balanced
2004; Garrity et al., 2010). Despite its significant role in approach considering economic viability, environmental
climate change mitigation, agroforestry is often not safety, and social acceptability to achieve sustainable food
systematically accounted for in global carbon budgets or production and global food security (Gurr et al., 2017; Hoddle,
national carbon accounting (Jose, 2009; Montagnini & Nair, 2017). The revised IPM model incorporates fundamental
2004). It has been a prominent feature of temperate regions principles such as scouting and thresholds, reducing pesticide
worldwide, offering benefits such as food security, enhanced use by integrating biological, cultural, mechanical, physical,
biodiversity, enriched ecosystems, and addressing and chemical processes sustainably to minimize economic,
environmental goals like maintaining CO2 levels below health, and environmental risks (Birkett et al., 2018; Gurr et
specific thresholds (Garrity et al., 2010; Nair, 2012). The al., 2017). It aims to align with current global food production
advantages of agroforestry encompass improved soil fertility trends, consumption patterns, and environmental and social
leading to higher vegetable yields, extended harvest seasons, considerations (Gurr et al., 2017). IPM involves employing a
enhanced produce quality, and increased income for rural variety of pest management strategies to supplement, decrease,
populations (Jose, 2009). or replace synthetic pesticides, including simultaneous
management and integration of tactics, regular monitoring of
I. Integrated Nutrient Management pests and natural enemies, and the use of decision thresholds
Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) constitutes a (Hoddle, 2017; Gurr et al., 2017). This approach not only
strategic approach aimed at sustaining soil fertility and reduces synthetic pesticide use but also enhances on- and off-
optimizing nutrient levels essential for crops throughout their farm sustainability, saving farmers money while providing
life cycle (Malik et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2019). This strategy ecosystem goods and services (Birkett et al., 2018; Gurr et al.,
involves the balanced and integrated use of both organic and 2017). By implementing practical and inexpensive agricultural
inorganic fertilizers, serving the dual purpose of maintaining measures with minimal disruption to the ecosystem, IPM
agricultural productivity while safeguarding the environment ensures sustainable agricultural output, making it a proven
for future generations (Pandey et al., 2020). The INM system strategy to combat pest problems without unnecessary
integrates various key components to achieve its objectives. pesticide use (Hoddle, 2017; Gurr et al., 2017). It relies on
Firstly, it considers all potential nutrient sources to develop current, thorough data on pest life cycles and interactions to
nutrient input programs that enhance nutrient-use efficiency establish action thresholds before implementing pest control
and increase yield production (Thompson et al., 2015; Sharma interventions (Birkett et al., 2018; Gurr et al., 2017).
et al., 2018). Secondly, it emphasizes understanding the types
and quantities of soil nutrient content around the root zone, K. Aquaponics and Hydroponics
known as soil balance, and its temporal and spatial availability Aquaponics is a symbiotic system that combines
to meet nutrient requirements (Singh et al., 2019; Kumar et al., aquaculture (fish cultivation) with hydroponics (soil-less plant
2021). Thirdly, INM focuses on reducing nutrient losses, cultivation) (Endut et al., 2010). Hydroponics involves
particularly in intensive agriculture, through efficient growing plants in nutrient-rich water, often with roots
management practices (Bhattacharya et al., 2017; Chandel et supported by an inert medium (Resh, 2013). Both aquaponics
al., 2020). Finally, it considers all factors influencing the and hydroponics offer significant reductions in water usage
plant/nutrient connection to achieve high-yield production, compared to traditional farming methods, making them
water use efficiency, grain superiority, economic returns, and particularly suitable for urban and arid regions (Goddek et al.,
sustainability (Kumar et al., 2021; Pandey et al., 2020). INM 2015). Additionally, these systems enable year-round
aims to integrate natural and man-made soil nutrients to production and reduce the risk of soil-borne diseases (Rakocy
enhance agricultural output while conserving soil productivity et al., 2006). However, it's essential to note that implementing
for future generations (Malik et al., 2018). Unlike approaches aquaponics and hydroponics requires substantial initial
solely focused on individual crops, INM maximizes nutritional
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2302
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
investments, technical expertise, and consistent monitoring O. Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Agriculture
and management (Rakocy et al., 2006). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Big Data technologies are
revolutionizing the agricultural sector by enabling data-driven
L. Conservation Agriculture decision-making and enhancing operational efficiency.
Conservation agriculture is an agroecosystem Machine learning algorithms, fueled by extensive datasets
management approach aimed at enhancing productivity, from various sources such as weather, soil, and crop data,
biodiversity, and ecosystem services (Pannell et al., 2014). facilitate predictive analytics and recommend optimal farming
This approach is based on three interconnected principles: practices (Biradar et al., 2019). AI also drives automation in
minimizing soil disturbance through no-till farming, agriculture through the deployment of autonomous machinery
maintaining permanent soil cover with crops or cover crops, like tractors and harvesters, equipped with AI capabilities to
and implementing crop rotation (Hobbs et al., 2008). Scientific perform tasks efficiently and reduce reliance on manual labor
evidence suggests that conservation agriculture can improve (Gebbers & Adamchuk, 2010). Moreover, data analytics
water infiltration, reduce erosion, promote soil health, and contribute to improving supply chain management, forecasting
facilitate carbon sequestration (Kassam et al., 2015). However, demand, and optimizing distribution channels, leading to
its adoption may require adjustments in machinery, a longer- reduced waste and increased profitability for farmers (Wolfert
term perspective, and customized pest and weed management, et al., 2017). These technological advancements underscore
which can present challenges for farmers (Pretty et al., 2006). the transformative potential of AI and Big Data in enhancing
agricultural productivity, sustainability, and profitability,
M. Application of Drones and Satellite Imagery paving the way for a more efficient and resilient agricultural
In modern sustainable agriculture practices, drones and industry. However, challenges related to data privacy,
satellite imagery play a crucial role (Anderson et al., 2018). integration complexities, and accessibility remain to be
These advanced technologies enable precise and timely data addressed for widespread adoption and effective
collection, which is essential for monitoring crop health, implementation of these technologies in agriculture.
optimizing irrigation, identifying pests and diseases, and
improving yield forecasts (De Castro et al., 2017; La Saponara III. CONCLUSION
et al., 2020). Satellite imagery provides a comprehensive view
of vast farmlands, allowing for the assessment of overall crop Various approaches to sustainable agriculture encompass
health, irrigation monitoring, and management of large-scale a wide range of methods, including agroecology,
farms (Wu et al., 2018). Conversely, drones offer a closer and permaculture, organic farming, conservation farming,
more detailed perspective, particularly valuable for tasks such regenerative farming, and more. These approaches are crucial
as crop scouting, disease detection, and precise input for maintaining ecological sustainability and addressing food
application (Anderson et al., 2018). security challenges, especially with the growing global
population. The trajectory of sustainable agriculture is
N. Biotechnology in Sustainable Agriculture influenced by technological advancements such as precision
Biotechnology plays a crucial role in advancing farming, drones, biotechnology, and AI. These innovations,
sustainable agriculture by providing essential tools and particularly when integrated synergistically, contribute
methodologies. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are a significantly to promoting sustainability in agriculture.
significant aspect of biotechnology, offering the capability to Practices within sustainable agriculture include crop rotation,
engineer crops with improved traits such as enhanced nutrient embracing biodiversity, minimizing tillage, adopting
content, increased yield, resilience to drought, and resistance integrated pest management (IPM), utilizing precision
to pests and diseases. These modifications reduce the agriculture, and incorporating agroforestry practices. These
dependency on chemical inputs in agricultural practices (Qaim activities play a vital role in improving soil health, conserving
& Kouser, 2013; James, 2018). Additionally, advancements in resources, and reducing environmental impacts. The adoption
gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9, present of modern agricultural approaches and practices is essential
modern opportunities for crop improvement by precisely for transitioning to a sustainable global economy. Preserving
modifying genetic sequences (Scheben et al., 2016). Despite nature's benefits while ensuring food security is crucial for our
the potential benefits, the integration of biotechnology into survival. Embracing these eco-friendly approaches is
agriculture is a topic of debate due to challenges related to imperative for our shared future, emphasizing the urgency of
regulations, ethical considerations, and public acceptance sustainable farming practices.
(Wesseler et al., 2014). These issues underscore the need for
comprehensive assessment and dialogue to ensure responsible
and sustainable utilization of biotechnological innovations in
agriculture.
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2303
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
REFERENCES [15]. Chen, F., Peng, Z., & Li, B. (2019). Advances in
precision agriculture technologies for crop stress
[1]. Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: The Science of tolerance breeding. Agriculture, Ecosystems &
Sustainable Agriculture. CRC Press. Environment, 284, 106586.
[2]. Altieri, M. A. (1999). The Ecological Role of [16]. Conway, G. R. (1997). The Doubly Green Revolution:
Biodiversity in Agroecosystems. Agriculture, Food for All in the 21st Century. Cornell University
Ecosystems & Environment, 74(1-3), 19-31. Press.
[3]. Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. [17]. De Castro, A. I., Jurado, J. M., & Fernandez-Rubio, J.
(2017). Agroecology and the design of climate change- (2017). Unmanned aerial systems (UASs) for
resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable environmental applications. Geosciences, 7(3), 62.
Development, 37(3), 33. [18]. Dixon, J., Gulliver, A., & Gibbon, D. (2001). Farming
[4]. Anderson, K., & Gaston, K. J. (2018). Lightweight systems and poverty: Improving farmers' livelihoods in a
unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial changing world. FAO and World Bank.
ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, [19]. Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The Politics of the Earth:
16(6), 324-325. Environmental Discourses. Oxford University Press.
[5]. Basso, B., & Antle, J. (2020). Digital agriculture: An [20]. Elevitch, C. R., Mazaroli, D. N., & Ragone, D. (2018).
introduction. American Journal of Agricultural Agroforestry standards for regenerative agriculture.
Economics, 102(2), 373-391. Sustainability, 10(9), 3337.
[6]. Bengtsson, J., Ahnström, J., & Weibull, A. C. (2005). [21]. Endut, A., Jusoh, A., Ali, N. M., Wan Nik, W. B., &
The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and Hassan, A. (2010). A study on the optimal hydraulic
abundance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, loading rate and plant ratios in recirculation aquaponic
42(2), 261-269. system. Desalination, 262(1-3), 187-192.
[7]. Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, B., & Kalamdhad, A. S. [22]. FAO. (2010). "Climate-Smart" Agriculture: Policies,
(2017). A review of recent advancements in the Practices, and Financing for Food Security, Adaptation
management of agricultural waste using integrated and Mitigation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
nutrient management. Bioresource Technology, 241, United Nations.
1101-1114. [23]. FAO. (2010). Integrated Crop-Livestock Farming
[8]. Biradar, C. M., Hari Prasad, K. S., & Rao, G. S. L. H. V. Systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in agriculture: A United Nations.
comprehensive review. Journal of Agricultural [24]. FAO. (2013). Climate Smart Agriculture Sourcebook.
Engineering, 56(3), 1-12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
[9]. Birkett, M. A., Pickett, J. A., Khan, Z. R., & Al Abassi, Nations.
S. (2018). IPM to sustainable food production. [25]. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2012). The
Phytochemistry Reviews, 17(5), 1149-1151. State of Food Insecurity in the World.
[10]. Blackmore, S., Godwin, R. J., & Fountas, S. (2013). [26]. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2018). The
Precision agriculture: A new approach to crop Future of Food and Agriculture – Alternative Pathways
management. In Advances in Agronomy (Vol. 120, pp. to 2050.
1-23). Academic Press. [27]. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2020). The
[11]. Bonaudo, T., Bendahan, A. B., Sabatier, R., Ryschawy, State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020.
J., Bellon, S., Leger, F., & Tichit, M. (2014). [28]. Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I.
Agroecological principles for the redesign of integrated J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., & Godfray, H. C. J.
crop-livestock systems. European Journal of Agronomy, (2013). Sustainable intensification in agriculture:
57, 43-51. Premises and policies. Science, 341(6141), 33-34.
[12]. Campbell, B. M., Thornton, P., Zougmore, R., van [29]. Garrity, D., Akinnifesi, F., Ajayi, O., Weldesemayat, S.,
Asten, P., & Lipper, L. (2014). Sustainable Mowo, J., Kalinganire, A., & Larwanou, M. (2010).
intensification: What is its role in climate-smart Evergreen agriculture: A robust approach to sustainable
agriculture? Current Opinion in Environmental food security in Africa. Food Security, 2(3), 197-214.
Sustainability, 8, 39-43. [30]. Gebbers, R., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010). Precision
[13]. Carpenter-Boggs, L., Kennedy, A. C., & Reganold, J. P. agriculture and food security. Science, 327(5967), 828-
(2000). Organic and biodynamic management: Effects on 831.
soil biology. Soil Science Society of America Journal, [31]. Goddek, S., Delaide, B., Mankasingh, U., Ragnarsdottir,
64(5), 1651-1659. K. V., Jijakli, H., & Thorarinsdottir, R. (2015).
[14]. Chandel, V., Sharma, A., & Kumar, R. (2020). Integrated Challenges of sustainable and commercial aquaponics.
nutrient management in sustainable agriculture: A Sustainability, 7(4), 4199-4224.
review. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology,
14(2), 1175-1183.
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2304
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
[32]. Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., [48]. Lampkin, N. (1994). Organic Farming: Sustainable
Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., ... & Toulmin, C. Agriculture in Practice. In Sustainable Agriculture:
(2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion Green Fights for the Future, 56-70.
people. Science, 327(5967), 812-818. [49]. Liebman, M., & Davis, A. S. (2009). Managing weeds in
[33]. Gold, M. V. (2007). Sustainable Agriculture: Definitions organic farming systems: an ecological approach. In
and Terms. USDA National Agricultural Library. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(2), 49-51.
[34]. Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011). [50]. Lipper, L., Thornton, P., Campbell, B. M., Baedeker, T.,
Environmental impact of different agricultural Braimoh, A., Bwalya, M., & Hottle, R. (2014). Climate-
management practices: conventional vs. organic smart agriculture for food security. Nature Climate
agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1-2), Change, 4(12), 1068-1072.
95-124. [51]. Liu, Y., Huang, L., Wang, W., Qin, W., & Zhou, K.
[35]. Gurr, G. M., Wratten, S. D., & Luna, J. M. (2017). (2019). Precision agriculture technologies for crop
Multi-function agricultural biodiversity: Pest farming system. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,
management and other benefits. Basic and Applied 18(4), 731-749.
Ecology, 18, 1-14. [52]. Malik, R. K., Rana, S. S., & Kumar, V. (2018).
[36]. Hobbs, P. R., Sayre, K., & Gupta, R. (2008). The role of Integrated nutrient management for sustainable crop
conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. production. Journal of Pharmacognosy and
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Phytochemistry, 7(2), 1932-1937.
Biological Sciences, 363(1491), 543-555. [53]. Montagnini, F., & Nair, P. K. (2004). Carbon
[37]. Hoddle, M. S. (2017). IPM: What is it and why should sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit
extension educators care? Journal of Extension, 55(3), of agroforestry systems. Springer Science & Business
3FEA2. Media.
[38]. IFOAM. (2005). Principles of Organic Agriculture. [54]. Montgomery, D. R. (2017). Growing a revolution:
International Federation of Organic Agriculture Bringing our soil back to life. W. W. Norton &
Movements. Company.
[39]. James, C. (2018). Global status of commercialized [55]. Nair, P. K. R. (2012). Agroforestry - The future of global
biotech/GM crops: 2018. ISAAA Brief No. 54. ISAAA: land use. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ithaca, NY. [56]. Newton, P., Civita, N., Frankel-Goldwater, L., Bartel, K.,
[40]. Jose, S. (2009). Agroforestry for ecosystem services and & Johns, C. (2020). What is regenerative agriculture? A
environmental benefits: An overview. Agroforestry review of scholar and practitioner definitions based on
Systems, 76(1), 1-10. processes and outcomes. Frontiers in Sustainable Food
[41]. Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Shaxson, F., & Pretty, J. Systems, 4, 577723.
(2015). The spread of conservation agriculture: [57]. Pandey, P., Pandey, A. K., & Singh, N. (2020).
Justification, sustainability and uptake. International Integrated nutrient management for sustainable crop
Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 13(3), 292-320. production: A review. International Journal of Chemical
[42]. Koepf, H. H. (1989). The Biodynamic Farm. Studies, 8(1), 378-383.
Anthroposophic Press. [58]. Parrott, N., & Marsden, T. (2002). The real green
[43]. Kremen, C., & Miles, A. (2012). Ecosystem Services in revolution: Organic and agroecological farming in the
Biologically Diversified Versus Conventional Farming South. Greenpeace Environmental Trust.
Systems: Benefits, Externalities, and Trade-offs. Ecology [59]. Partey, S. T., Koo, J., Sadick, A., Nkansah, P.,
and Society, 17(4). Zougmore, R., & Nyadzi, E. (2018). Climate-smart
[44]. Kumar, V., Joshi, N., Singh, S. K., & Sharma, S. (2021). agriculture in the African context. Sustainability, 10(9),
Impact of integrated nutrient management on soil fertility 3196.
and crop productivity. Journal of Pharmacognosy and [60]. Paull, J. (2011). Biodynamic agriculture: The journey
Phytochemistry, 10(2), 786-791. from Koberwitz to the world, 1924-1938. Journal of
[45]. La Saponara, V., Nardinocchi, C., Dainelli, R., Di Organic Systems, 6(1), 27-41.
Gennaro, S., & Alippi, A. (2020). A review of UAV [61]. Peng, X., Cao, S., Zuo, Q., & Xia, H. (2020). A review
remote sensing applications for agroforestry systems. of the development of precision agriculture technologies.
Remote Sensing, 12(18), 2970. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological
[46]. LaCanne, C. E., & Lundgren, J. G. (2018). Regenerative Engineering, 13(5), 17-29.
agriculture: Merging farming and natural resource [62]. Pimentel, D., Hepperly, P., Hanson, J., Douds, D., &
conservation profitably. PeerJ, 6, e4428. Seidel, R. (2005). Environmental, energetic, and
[47]. Lal, R. (2020). Regenerative agriculture for food and economic comparisons of organic and conventional
climate. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 75(5), farming systems. BioScience, 55(7), 573-582.
123A-124A.
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2305
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
[63]. Pretty, J. (2008). Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, [79]. Schleenbecker, R., & Hamm, U. (2013). Consumers’
principles, and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of perception of organic product attributes and organic food
the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491), purchase decisions: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable
447-465. Development, 33(4), 275-295.
[64]. Pretty, J. N. (1995). Regenerating Agriculture: Policies [80]. Schreefel, L., Schulte, R. P., de Boer, I. J., Schrijver, A.
and Practice for Sustainability and Self-Reliance. P., & van Zanten, H. H. (2020). Regenerative
Earthscan. agriculture–the soil is the base. Global Food Security, 26,
[65]. Pretty, J., Benton, T. G., Bharucha, Z. P., Dicks, L. V., 100404.
Flora, C. B., Godfray, H. C. J., ... & Sutherland, W. J. [81]. Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2012).
(2018). Global assessment of agricultural system Comparing the yields of organic and conventional
redesigns for sustainable intensification. Nature agriculture. Nature, 485(7397), 229-232.
Sustainability, 1(8), 441-446. [82]. Sharma, V., Dhingra, A., & Sharma, S. (2018).
[66]. Pretty, J., Toulmin, C., & Williams, S. (2006). Sustainable agriculture and role of integrated nutrient
Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. management in enhancing soil health and productivity.
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 4(2), Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(3),
101-116. 2128-2133.
[67]. Pretty, J., Toulmin, C., & Williams, S. (2011). [83]. Singh, S., Khadka, M. S., Bista, B., & Shrestha, R.
Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. (2019). Integrated nutrient management in paddy
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9(1), cultivation for sustainable productivity. International
5-24. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research,
[68]. Qaim, M., & Kouser, S. (2013). Genetically modified 5(1), 108-116.
crops and food security. PLOS ONE, 8(6), e64879. [84]. Singh, Y. V., Singh, R., & Prasad, S. M. (2011).
[69]. Rakocy, J. E., Bailey, D. S., Shultz, R. C., & Thoman, E. Integrated farming system for Eastern India. Indian
S. (2006). Aquaponic production of tilapia and basil: Journal of Agronomy, 56(4), 297-304.
Comparing a batch and staggered cropping system. Acta [85]. Sudduth, K. A., & Kitchen, N. R. (2005). The emergence
Horticulturae, 742, 63-74. of precision agriculture. Crop Management, 4(1), 1-14.
[70]. Reganold, J. P. (1995). Soil quality and profitability of [86]. Taylor, B. (2002). Ecological Resistance Movements:
biodynamic and conventional farming systems: A The Global Emergence of Radical and Popular
review. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, Environmentalism. State University of New York Press
10(1), 36-45. [87]. Tesfaye, K., Kruseman, G., Cairns, J. E., Zaman-Allah,
[71]. Resh, H. M. (2013). Hydroponic food production: A M. A., Wegary, D., Zaidi, P. H., & Erenstein, O. (2015).
definitive guidebook for the advanced home gardener Potential benefits of drought and heat tolerance for
and the commercial hydroponic grower. CRC Press. adapting maize to climate change in tropical
[72]. Rhodes, C. J. (2017). The imperative for regenerative environments. Climate Risk Management, 3, 38-51.
agriculture. Science Progress, 100(1), 80-129. [88]. Thompson, M. L., Shearer, S. A., & Meldrum, J. (2015).
[73]. Rigby, D., & Cáceres, D. (2001). Organic farming and Integrated nutrient management strategies for enhancing
the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agricultural crop productivity in intensive maize-based systems.
Systems, 68(1), 21-40. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 214, 87-102.
[74]. Robertson, G. P., & Swinton, S. M. (2005). Reconciling [89]. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011).
Agricultural Productivity and Environmental Integrity: A Global food demand and the sustainable intensification
Grand Challenge for Agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of
and the Environment, 3(1), 38-46. Sciences, 108(50), 20260-20264.
[75]. Röling, N. G., & Wagemakers, M. A. (2000). Facilitating [90]. Tilman, D., et al. (2002). Agricultural Sustainability and
Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Intensive Production Practices. Nature, 418(6898), 671-
Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental 677.
Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press. [91]. Turinek, M., Grobelnik-Mlakar, S., Bavec, M., & Bavec,
[76]. Sanginga, N., & Woomer, P. L. (2009). Integrated Soil F. (2009). Biodynamic agriculture research progress and
Fertility Management in Africa: Principles, Practices, priorities. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems,
and Developmental Process. CIAT. 24(2), 146-154.
[77]. Scheben, A., Wolter, F., Batley, J., & Puchta, H. (2016). [92]. United Nations Department of Economic and Social
How can plant breeding address the future needs of Affairs (UN DESA). (2019). World Population Prospects
agriculture? Plant Molecular Biology, 92(1-2), 561-565. 2019.
[78]. Scherr, S. J., Shames, S., & Friedman, R. (2012). From [93]. United Nations. (2017). World Population Prospects: The
climate-smart agriculture to climate-smart landscapes. 2017 Revision.
Agriculture & Food Security, 1(1), 12.
IJISRT24MAY1714 www.ijisrt.com 2306
Volume 9, Issue 5, May – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1714
[94]. Wesseler, J., Zilberman, D., & Nelson, G. C. (2014). The
impacts and acceptance of agricultural biotechnology:
An introduction to the special issue. Food Policy, 49, 1-
4.
[95]. Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D.,
& David, C. (2009). Agroecology is a science, a
movement, and a practice. A review. Agronomy for
Sustainable Development, 29, 503-515.
[96]. Willer, H., & Lernoud, J. (2019). The World of Organic
Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2019.
Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and
IFOAM Organics International.
[97]. Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M. J.
(2017). Big data in smart farming – A review.
Agricultural Systems, 153, 69-80.
[98]. Wu, M., Sun, Z., & He, X. (2018). Remote sensing
applications for precision agriculture: A learning
community approach. International Journal of Applied
Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 64, 180-191.
