0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views12 pages

V. Smea - A4

awea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views12 pages

V. Smea - A4

awea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

V. SCHOOL MONITORING, EVALUATION AND ADJUSTMENT STRATEGIES (SMEA)


The school will implement a systematic process for collection, collation, and analysis of key education data and information that will allow the School
Governing Council (SGC) to determine the progress of SIP implementation based on targets. The main objective of the SMEA is to facilitate decision-
making for a more relevant and responsive delivery of basic education services at the school level.

Pillar 1 – Access
The table below highlights the key performance indicators (KPIs) on access including school’s target in six (6) years. Access indicators are expanded to cover school-
age children, learners in school, out-of-school children (OSC), and out-of-school youth (OSY). Most KPIs are currently verifiable in the Enhanced Basic Education
Information System (EBEIS) except indicators pertaining to incidences of OSC and OSY. Targets pertaining to OSC and OSY will be set when mechanisms for
determining baseline information are established and operational.
Result Division Means of Frequency
Physical Target Responsible M&E
Statement/ Key Targetby2028 Verification/ of Data
Performance Body Strategy
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Source of Collection
IndicatorOutcome (IO) #1 All school-age children, out-of-school youth, and adults accessed
Intermediate Data
relevant basic learning opportunities
1. Percentage of school-age children in school - Net Enrollment Rate (NER)
Annual
SECONDARY –
95% 96% 97% 98% 99% 100% BEIS/ICT Implementation
NER 98% EBEIS Annually
92% 94% 96% 98% 99% 100% Coordinator Review
(JHS & SHS)
(AIR)/SOSA
2. Incidence of OOSC & OSY
Annual
Junior High School
Implementation
Out of School BEIS/ICT
3.25% EBEIS Annually Review
Rate 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1% 0% Coordinator
(AIR)/SOSA
Annual
Senior High Implementation
School BEIS/ICT Review
4% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1% 0% EBEIS Annually
Out of School Coordinator (AIR)/SOSA
Rate
IO1.1- All five-year-old children in school
IO1.2 - All learners will stay in school and finish key stage
4. Percentage of enrollees (Elem, JHS, SHS) in a given school year who continue to be in school the following school year- Retention Rate
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

Junior High School


EBEIS/ICT
Retention Rate 98.50% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% SF7/EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Coordinator
Senior High
EBEIS/ICT
School 98.50% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% SF7/EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Coordinator
Retention Rate
5. Percentage of currently enrolled learners but did not finish/complete the school year – Dropout Rate (DR)
Junior High School EBEIS/ICT
Dropout Rate 0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% .5% 0% SF7/EBEIS Annually Coordinator AIR/SOSA

Senior High EBEIS/ICT


School 0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% .5% 0% SF7/EBEIS Annually Coordinator AIR/SOSA
Dropout Rate
IO1.2 - All learners will stay in school and finish key stage
7. Percentage of OSC and OSY who returned to school or participated in ALS – Participation Rate of OSC and OS
OUT-OF-SCHOOL TBD
YOUTH
EBEIS/ICT
Participation Rate 80% 85% 90% 95% 98% 98% SF7/EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Coordinator

8. Percentage of completers in ALS- completed session -ALS


OUT-OF-SCHOOL TBD EBEIS/ICT
CHILDREN – Coordinator
Completed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A SF7/EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Sessions - ALS

OUT-OF-SCHOOL TBD
YOUTH -
EBEIS/ICT
Completed 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% SF7/EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Coordinator
Sessions - ALS

B. Pillar 2 – Equity
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

The SMEA Framework of Pillar 2 highlights DepEd’s commitment on inclusion. The table contains the KPIs that will be used to measure involvements
and performance of learners or groups in situations of disadvantage. The table also outlines the indicators, proposed means of verification (MOV), and
the M&E strategies to be used in validating the outcomes under Equity. To date, no targets on Equity are committed pending the completion of baseline
information on learners in situations of disadvantage and development of systems that will “tag” learners in situation of disadvantage.

Result Division Means of Frequency


Physical 2026
Target 2027 Responsible M&E
Statement/ Key Targetby2028 2023 2024 2025 2028 Verification/ of Data
Performance Body Strategy
Source of Collection
Indicator Data

SECONDARY – % 80
Disparity in EBEIS & ICT
85% 87% 90% 93% 95% 98% EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
transition rate Coordinator

SECONDARY -
Gender Parity EBEIS & ICT
Index Completion 85% 87% 90% 93% 95% 98% EBEIS Annually Coordinator AIR/SOSA

SECONDARY TBD EBEIS & ICT


97% 97% 98% 98% 99% 99% EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Retention Rate Coordinator
4. Percentage of learners in situations of disadvantage (disaggregated by group) achieved at least a fixed level of proficiency/mastery in (a) functional
Functional
Literacy
% of learners at Semi- PHIL-IRI
TBD 65% 70% 75% 80% 83% 85% PHIL-IRI AIR/SOSA
with at least Annually Coordinator
proficient level or
better
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

Numeracy
% of learners at
EBEIS & ICT
with at least TBD 70% 75% 77% 79% 81% 84% MPS Annually AIR/SOSA
Coordinator
proficient level or
better
21st Century Skills
% of learners at
with at least Quarterly & EBEIS & ICT
TBD 72% 74% 76% 78% 80% 82% MPS & NAT AIR/SOSA
proficient level or Annually Coordinator
better

C. Pillar 3 – Quality
The SMEA Framework for Pillar 3 outlines the KPIs on quality. The overall target on quality is set at “learners attaining nearly proficient level or better.”
The national achievement test (NAT) administered by DepEd’s Bureau of Education Assessment (BEA) will be used to verify learners’ attainment.

Result Division Means of Frequency


Physical 2026
Target 2027 Responsible M&E
Statement/ Key Targetby2028 2023 2024 2025 2028 Verification/ of Data
Performance Body Strategy
Source of Collection
IndicatorOutcome (IO) #3. Learners complete K-12 basic education having attained all learning standards that equip them with the necessary skills
Intermediate
1. Percentage of learners pursued their chosen paths
% Proceeded to TBD SHS Adviser &
91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 96% SRC Annually AIR & SOA
college Registrar
% Proceeded to TBD EBEIS & ICT
91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 96% EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
employment Coordinator
% Proceeded to TBD
EBEIS & ICT
entrepreneurship 91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 96% EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Coordinator
% Proceeded to TBD
EBEIS & ICT
middle level skills 91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 96% EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Coordinator
training
2. Percentage of learners in a cohort who completed Grade 6 / Grade 12- Completion Rate - (CR)
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

SECONDARY – CR ICT/ School


Planning
90% 97.5% 98% 98.5% 99% 99.5% 100% EBEIS Annually AIR/SOSA
Service

Percentage of Master
Annual PIR,
learners achieving Teachers/ HT/
Mid-Year
nearly proficient School
75% 75% 76% 77% 78% 79% 80% MPS Quarterly Review,
or better in Assessment
Outcome
English Team
Evaluation

IO3.3 -Learners attain Stage 3 (Grades 7-10) learning standards of literacy & numeracy skills and apply 21st century skills to various
6. Percentage of
G10 learners
attaining nearly
PHIL-IRI Reading
proficient level or 75% 75% 76% 77% 78% 79% 80% SEMESTRAL PIR/APR/ SOSA
Report Coordinator
better in Stage 3
literacy (4 pp/yr)

7. Percentage of
G10 learners
attaining nearly
proficient level or
better in Stage 3
numeracy Math Coor/
75% 75% 78% 81% 83% 85% 90% Quarterly MPS QUARTERLY PIR/APR/ SOSA
standards (4 MPS Coor
pp/yr)

IO3.4 - Learners attain Stage 4 (Grades 11-12) learning standards equipped with knowledge and 21st century competencies
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

8. Percentage of
Grade 12 learners
attaining nearly
Math
proficient level or
Coordinator/
better in Stage 4 75% 80% 84% 86% 88% 90% 92% Quarterly MPS QUARTERLY PIR/APR/ SOSA
MPS
core SHS areas (6
Coordinator
pp/yr)

D. Pillar 4 – Resiliency and Well-Being


The SMEA Framework for Pillar 4 shows the KPIs to be used in planning learners’ resiliency and well-being. Together with Equity, Pillar 4 highlights
DepEd’s commitments to advance the rights and well-being of learners. Currently, the mechanisms for verifying KPIs under Pillar 4 will need to be
established and set up. As of this period, no targets are set for most KPIs.
Result Division Means of Frequency
Physical Target Responsible M&E
Statement/ Key Targetby2028 Verification/ of Data
Performance 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Body Strategy
Source of Collection
Indicator Data
Intermediate Outcome (IO) #4. Learners are resilient and know their rights and have the life skills to protect themselves and claim their education
Annual
Performance
1. Percentage of Review (AIR)/
DRRM In-
affected and State of the
100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% EBEIS Annually Charge, BEIS
displaced learners School Address
Coordinator
retained (SOSA)/ Mid-
Term Review
(MTR)
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

2. Percentage of
learners who
reported violence Annual
committed against Performance
them by other Survey Form Review (AIR)/
learners (bullying) Child
(School May State of the
or adults (child 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Annually Protection
develop a School Address
abuse) based on Committee
survey form) (SOSA)/ Mid-
intake sheets of Term Review
schools (MTR)

3. Percentage of
learners who are
happy and
satisfied with their Annual
basic education Child Performance
experience in Protection Review (AIR)/
Learner
relation to the Committee, State of the
98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Satisfaction Annually
enjoyment of their Child Friendly School Address
Rating (LSR)
specific rights in School System (SOSA)/ Mid-
school and Committee Term Review
learning centers (MTR)
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

4. Percentage of
Annual
learners who
Child Performance
know their rights
Protection Review (AIR)/
TO and IN Learner
Committee, State of the
education, and 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Satisfaction Annually
Child Friendly School Address
how to claim them Rating (LSR)
School System (SOSA)/ Mid-
positively
Committee Term Review
(MTR)

5. Percentage of
schools and
learning centers Annual
significantly Child Performance
manifesting Protection Review (AIR)/
Learner
indicators of RBE Committee, State of the
98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Satisfaction Annually
(Right-Based Child Friendly School Address
Rating (LSR)
Education) in the School System (SOSA)/ Mid-
learning Committee Term Review
environment (MTR)

6. Learners
Performance
Satisfaction Rating Child
Review (AIR)/
on Rights-based Protection
Learner State of the
Education Committee,
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Satisfaction Annually School Address
Child Friendly
Rating (LSR) (SOSA)/ Mid-
School System
Term Review
Committee
(MTR)

IO4.1 Learners are served by a Department that adheres to a rights-based education framework at all levels.
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

7. Percentage of
personnel in
schools/ learning
centers who know Annual
the rights of Diagnostic Tool
Child Performance
children and on RBE for
Protection Review (AIR)/
learners in DepEd Offices
Committee, State of the
relation to RBE, 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% and Schools, Annually
Child Friendly School Address
and are able to Reports of
School System (SOSA)/ Mid-
infuse them in training on
Committee Term Review
their respective RBE completed
(MTR)
jobs/ duties

IO4.2 Learners are safe and protected, and can protect themselves from risks and impacts from natural and human-induced hazards
8. Percentage of Annual
learners equipped Performance
with capacities on Review (AIR)/
Child Friendly
what to do before, CSS Monitoring State of the
School System
during, and after 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Tool and Annually School Address
Committee/
a disaster/ EBEIS (SOSA)/ Mid-
SDRRM
emergency Term Review
(MTR)

9. Percentage of Annual
learners in safe Child Performance
schools Protection Review (AIR)/
CSS Monitoring Committee, State of the
100% 96% 97% 98% 99% 100% 100% Tool and Annually Child Friendly School Address
EBEIS School System (SOSA)/ Mid-
Committee/ Term Review
DRRM (MTR)
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

IO4.3 Learners have the basic physical, mental, and emotional fortitude to cope with various challenges in life
10. Percentage of
students with Annual
improved health Performance
statistics Review (AIR)/
(To be State of the
School Health
100% 90% 92% 94% 96% 98% 100% developed by Annually School Address
In-Charge/ Sch
CO) (SOSA)/ Mid-
Term Review
(MTR)

11. Percentage of
learners with Annual
improved physical Child Performance
fitness level Protection Review (AIR)/
(To be Committee, State of the
100% 95% 96% 97% 98% 99% 100% developed by Annually Child Friendly School Address
CO) School System (SOSA)/ Mid-
Committee/ Term Review
DRRM (MTR)

E. Enabling Mechanisms - Governance


To ensure more inclusive and complete enabling mechanisms, DepEd expanded the criteria for measuring success of governance and management
strategies. Tables below enumerates the KPIs to be used in verifying the six mechanisms under governance. These include: (i) participative and
inclusive management processes, (ii) strategic human resource management, (iii) investments in basic education, (iv) internal systems and processes,
(v) stakeholders’ participation, and (vi) public and private education complementarity.
Result Division Means of Frequency
Physical Target Responsible M&E
Statement/ Targetby2028 Verification/ of Data
KeyPerformance 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Body Strategy
Source of Collection
Indicator Data
Enabling Mechanism #1. Education leaders and managers practice participative and inclusive management processes
1. Levels of SBM practice
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

Annual
Performance
Review (AIR)/
Level Level Level Level Level SBM Level of SBM State of the
SECONDARY Level 1.5 Annually
1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 2 Practice Committee School Address
(SOSA)/ Mid-
Term Review
(MTR)

2. OPCRF RATING
Annual
Performance
Review (AIR)/
SBM Level of State of the
SBM
OPCRF RATING 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 5 Practice Annually School Address
Committee
OPCR MOV (SOSA)/ Mid-
Term Review
(MTR)

Enabling Mechanism #2. Strategic human resource management enhanced for continuing professional development and
3. Achieving ideal ratio on:
Classroom Physical
1:55 1:50 1:45 1:45 1:45 1:45 PPE Inventory Annually
Facilities
Teachers 1:55 Human Annual
1:50 1:45 1:45 1:45 1:45 SF7 Annually
Resource Performance
Textbooks 1:04 Property Review (AIR)/
1:04 1:03 1:03 1:02 1:01 PPE Inventory Annually
Custodian State of the
Seats 1:01 Property School Address
1:01 1:01 1:01 1:01 1:01 PPE Inventory Annually
Custodian (SOSA)/ Mid-
Science and Math 1:10 Property Term Review
1:09 1:08 1:07 1:06 1:05 PPE Inventory Annually (MTR)
Equipment Custodian
ICT Package/ E- 1:43 School ICT
1:35 1:30 1:25 1:20 1:15 PPE Inventory Annually
Classroom Coordinator
ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PCNCHS, C.Y. 2023-2028 School Monitoring and Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA)

Enabling Mechanism #3. Investments in basic education provide learners with the ideal learning environment
4. Presence of:
Annual
Performance
Review (AIR)/
School Heads
State of the
Functional Library 100% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% PPE Inventory Annually & School
School Address
Librarian
(SOSA)/ Mid-
Term Review
(MTR)

Annual
Performance
Review (AIR)/
Connection to Physical State of the
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% PPE Inventory Annually
Electricity Facilities School Address
(SOSA)/ Mid-
Term Review
(MTR)

Annual
Performance
Review (AIR)/
Connection to
ICT and State of the
Internet of 100% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% PPE Inventory Annually
Librarian School Address
Functional Library
(SOSA)/ Mid-
Term Review
(MTR)

You might also like