0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views28 pages

Something About The Education of The Young People in The Main Educational Priority of Countries

Uploaded by

Nhã Uyên
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views28 pages

Something About The Education of The Young People in The Main Educational Priority of Countries

Uploaded by

Nhã Uyên
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

NOWADAYS THE WAY MANY PEOPLE INTERACT WITH OTHER HAS CHANGED BECAUSE OF

TECHNOLOGY . IN WHAT WAYS HAS TECHNOLOGY AFFECTEDTHE TYPES OF RELATIONSHIP THAT PEOPLE
MAKE ? HAS THIS BEEN A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT ? GIVE YOUR OPINION

Over the past few years,

the acceleration of breakthrough technology has triggered far-


reaching changes in people’s communication method. There are
a plethora of measures in this trend have influenced our
impersonal relationships, I concur with the idea that this
influence could bring numerous positive outcomes.

It is undeniable to claim that the technology is likely to be


subject in many aspects of our lives. The first effect is to allow
the number of citizens having a desire to communicate with each
other by clicking on a mouse or touching on a screen. Secondly,
the goods consumption of residents is transformed by the advent
of cutting-edge technology in various ways. For instance, instead
of hanging out to purchase essential things, online shopping is
known for the most alternative solution possessing a host of
items, clothes and the like more efficient and faster or saving
their precious time which should be applied for another aspect.

On the other hand, to enhance the quality of people's


communication, the employment of breakthrough devices could
bring forward beneficial ramifications. First and foremost, job-
holders or lucrative enterprises are unlikely to find their
interactions onerous in terms of contracts, conferences,
incomes, among others. In fact, they do not have the attempt to
meet each other to discuss their works addressed via availing
telephones, laptops to have face-to-face communication without
encountering directly as the conventional method. Secondly, in
the aspect of education, there are a host of online services
supporting teachers and students in conducting numerous E-
learning courses. Taking the pandemic of Co-vid 19 as a shining
example, online learning is considered as one of the optimal
ways for learners to accumulate academic knowledge
effectively. This not only makes a contribution to generating the
safest learning environment but also join hands with the
authorities and governments to flattening the curb of death
casualties based on implementing their solutions, particularly in
minimizing the movement.

In conclusion, as cited above, while people's communication is


considerably impacted by the stride of technology, I strongly hold
a belief that this development would cater to our lives with full of
practical results.

Something about the education of the young people in the


main educational priority of countries. But others believe that
educating the adults who cannot read and write is needed by
society and we should help more with it. To what extent, do
you agree or disagree with their opinion

Some sets of people argue that grown up literacy is the problematic issue
and should the national budget youth education in grownup's education,
however, I cannot accept the view considering that the benefits of the
governments and the potential growth of children through the young student
studying.
Admittedly, I partly agree that adult literacy, which is the essential skill for
living in modern society is a worrying issue to not only the government but
also individuals. This is because under-learning cannot move forward one's
life smoothly and might ruin one's economic prospects. More specifically,
it is an undeniable truth that uneducated people are here to get a
satisfactory job since nowadays most of the companies has been changed
the business area which was tertiary industries that manufacturing products to
forth industry that manufacturing cutting edge skills including, artificial
intelligences, Thus they are in there of hiring applicants with specialised skill
and professional knowledge. As a result , the adult who does not have basic
abilities cannot choose to work in a limited working area, such as cleaning
jobs or delivering something. It might lead them to live with low salaries and
will remain to live at the bottom of the social status. From the
perspective of the ministry, the matter is exigent matter to solve through
educating them.

Nevertheless, I, as one of the opponents of this view, would like to point


out two things. First of all, the country's development assessment is
judged by the level of children’s schooling. From the view of the authority,
this assessment is crucial in that it shows the potential of the nation's
future, in other words, the future workforce. Thus , if the country has a
high level of the child's training, then it will show that those children grow
into a person with stable occupations available to pay higher taxes, such as a
doctor, a teacher, or an engineer. This is the reason why the state spent a large
amount of budget on the children's study. Furthermore, when it comes to
thinking about the opposite side which is the national taxes have diverted
into adult study, under-educated children will highly possibly fall into the
swamp of the crime. Considering the nature of the children, unlike the
adults, children are not mature enough to distinguish right from wrong and
easily be affected by external environments. In addition , another
potentially problematic issue is that less-educated children might grow into
a person who the authority trying to educate.

In conclusion, the government that prioritizes the potential merits should


spend the national budget to young children, despite the advantages that
grown up education would bring.

Bai 2

In this present world, education plays a vital role and many countries are
trying to create an environment which encourages the young generation to
focus more on education. However, there are people who say that adults who
are illiterate should also be helped by providing them with a basic level of
learning. I agree with this view because there are many adults who are
employed at positions which require basic communication skills which they
lack. Also, parent's are the first teacher's of children and if they can't teach
their children thenit gets difficult for the child in his/her future.

Firstly, communication skills are a must in this age and people who do not
have them often cannot survive for a long time in this competitive
environment. For example, youngsters communicate very well compared to
adults in multi-national companies. As a result, they move up the ladder
quickly and seniors stay in the same position for long durations. Therefore
, efforts must be taken to help these sought of people as it also helps the
literacy rate of the country.

Secondly, children who go to schools often need help from the parents to
understand the concepts and if parents don't have knowledge about the
subjects than it becomes a disappointment for both of them. For instance ,
when a child struggles in Mathematics subject and if parents are unable to
assist them it turns out to be an issue which is tackled by outsiders like
tutors or relatives. Hence , when seniors are assisted with this basic knowledge,
it's more likely that their children will prosper in future.

To conclude, it's important that youngsters are encouraged and motivated


for proper schooling, but elders also need the same efforts as they also live in
the same area where all these are mandatory for a good life. Hence, it's agreed
that more focus should be given towards the education of adults.

Children educating is expensive. In some countries, the


government pays partly or all education fees. Do the
advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

The government’s responsibility for the education of children has been a


controversial topic for several years. Some people think it will be
considerably beneficial for children if the school expenditure is provided by
the government due to the costly payment. From my standpoint, I
completely agree with the statement that the state ought to support the
payment of studying owing to the fact that this is one duty of the authority
to furnish citizens with basic necessities such as education.

Over the century, the accessing educational system has been an unsolved
issue in several countries around the world. Consequently, people in that
society are not educated and it causes the following trouble, for example
committing crime, health problems and more. These problems normally
occurred due to lacking knowledge and specific skills, which leads them to
be criminals. In some countries, the number of criminals is increasing because
citizens are unable to find a pay-well job, thus they do not enough money to
survive, and they commit crimes instead. If the majority of people are able to
study, the social issues will decrease due to the fact that they have the
capability to work and earn money. Furthermore, the community will be
improved cause having a quality population.

In contrast , in some regions, the state academy is not of adequate


excellent quality and does not have sufficient seats for all students , this
leads students to competitive circumstances, which make them suffer. For
instance, in Thailand, if students would like to be in a renowned university,
they have to get very high grades and need to test with the difficult exams.
Additionally, the budget that the authority provides to each institution is low,
which causes another trouble that comes up, for instance, the school is
incapable to organise the extra activities for their students. Therefore, having
support money from parents might be one method to encourage students to
learn in a supportive environment.

In conclusion, even though some of the support from parents is still crucial for
the school, the main action should be conducted by the government.

Educaiton should be accessible to people of all economic


backgrounds. All levels of educaiton, from primary school to
tertiary education, should be free. To what extent do you
agree with this opinion?

The precedence (ưu tiên) of education for whom and whether it should be
accessible at a free or reasonable price for all age groups which was always
a hotly debatable topic has become more controversial while copious
peoples claim that learning should be available to all classes of folks in
society at an economical price some critics argue that literacy should be free
to all.In my opinion the latter propositions appear to be more rational. This
essay will further elaborate on my view of the positive and negative impacts
of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

Firstly, to (bắt đầu) commence with the first statement undoubtedly every
mankind has the right to get an education in this world therefore, it should be
accessible to wider folks at an economical price that will be advantageous
for the country in terms of massive contribution. furthermore, the
government should emphasize the importance of the same class of
knowledge to the general public rather than distinction but also ensured
quality learning however the middle and low class who do not in a position to
get admission should be awarded scholarships. for ,example, In ,Pakistan all
institutions include a quota system for deserving pupils to get further learning
on a scholarship,

Secondly , moving towards the second argument critics thinks that learning
should be provided free of cost to all citizens in addition, from elementary
school to higher studies it will be an advantage to promote a high literacy
rate and improve the economy of a nation however I think it will not be
financially viable for any institution to provide free study until government
take the initiative to promote learning and bear the cost to make a country
prosperous. for ,instance there is no country in this world where education is
free it can be the least but not zero as it is not financially viable because a
country's economy is based on such institution such as the UK.

Finally , to sum up according to the arguments mentioned above one can


reach a conclusion that the importance of getting a study in every country is
crucial so therefore from my point of view it should be provided to all folks at
economical fees.

BAI 2
Now, In this global era, It seems to be really true that education is a very
significant one, it could have been accessible to people of all kinds of
economic backgrounds.Even though, All kinds of education, from elementary
school to secondary education, should be free without charges. In This
manuscript, I would elucidate my points and provide a clear conclusion.

To commence with, In this current generation, technology is growing by


leaps and bounds which is giving more benefits to education because we
are lived in a knowledge-based society.It is true that people would need
education which is useful for unprivileged people because they are
struggling for remuneration. For instance, In many developing nations, they
could have private schools and colleges with high paid fees, which is the
reason people are suffering to study.Even though, In past, plenty of parents
had imposed on their children to go an early job.

On the other hand , education gives umpteen career prospects which can be
lived prestigious life. Firstly,tertiary education is a very prominent one to
expose to a career because people could have improved many things
through prestigious universities such as comprehensive education , self-
confidence, dedication etc. For instance, In many nations, they could have
tremendously popular schools for primary and tertiary education, and they
could be helped the students effortlessly without charges compared to India.

Understandably, many of the points above have stated that education is


very important for our life . However, In many developed countries could help
to develop nations with education and economy wise. And also, the main
authority should give equal education rights to both men and women , treat
equally.

Something about the education of the young people in the


main educational priority of countries. But others believe that
educating the adults who cannot read and write is needed by
society and we should help more with it. To what extent, do
you agree or disagree with their opinion

Education is the best weapon to kill the pejoratives (sự trở nên xấu thêm) of
the nation . A pool of thought says that the state should emphasise on
infant education . On other hand, a group of people claim that the province
should expedite ( nhanh chóng ,nâng cấp , giục ) their annual budget on
adult education. I firmly stand with the foremost notion. Because
( trẻcon) today's tot is tomorrow's leader and adult alliteration will
diminish in a very short term of time. The below-mentioned paragraphs will
portray my notions.

To embark on, the( vận tốc)velocity of development of the state depends


on the literacy rate of the territory. if, the administration of the nation
concentrates on Kindergaten education mechanism. It will enhance the
number of scholars and that group of people will accelerate the
development. For instance , Finland is the world's happiest nation on the
globe. Because the minor education system of Finland is very strong and this
mechanism removes the ignorant from adults.

Secondly, If government provides quality education to kids. It will play a vital


role in society spreading awareness . This phenomenon will put an effect
on the adult's to age well and they can get literate at home as well with the
help of youngsters.

In nutshell, the basic education system is the backbone of the nation and
government should make its expenses on it. Despite it they also spread an
advertisement for child education

Modern technology has being used more and more in


different aspects of our lives, such as education. Do the
advantages of using technology as an educational tool
outweigh its disadvantages?

The use of technology has been spiking up over the last decade all over
the world. Technological influence can even be seen in the classroom.
Although it possesses both pros and cons, I believe its benefits outweigh the
drawbacks. I shall draw upon a few illustrations that reveal both the aspects
of this phenomenon.

Firstly, some rather obvious advantages of using technology as an


educational instrument can be found. One of them is its ability to engage
students with various interactive learning resources such as audiovisual
representations, smartboards, etc. Additionally, its endless array of
informational resources stand remarkable in the present educational system.
Above all, today's online teaching with the advent of the internet has become
popularly trending with the enormous benefits that it has brought in. For
instance, Online learning has come to our rescue during the coronavirus
pandemic situation. With
this, students do not need to suffer from losing their academic years.

Nevertheless, on the downside of the matter, some negative aspects should


be pondered as well. To begin with, automation can be quite distracting. At a
young age, it is highly possible to lose focus with the online adverts and
windows pop-ups during studies. To illustrate, the recent New York
educational research found that 70% of the teenagers are suffering
withholding their attention spans for a minute on anything. This is the
consequence of online learning. Furthermore, the rate of children suffering
from optometric diseases has been increasing due to the over-exposure to the
screen and thereby leads to sleeplessness, which is highly detrimental among
children.

All in all, it can be seen that the application of tools in schools can be
beneficial for students. However, the merits of technological usage
undoubtedly outweigh the demerits by wisely leveraging it.
With the rapid advancement of communication technology:
smartphones, tablets and other mobile devices, some people
believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?
#advancement#communication#technology#smartphones#tablets#devices#people

With the fast rising in communication technology, some groups of people

often argue that its drawbacks prevail over its merits. This essay agrees with
this statement because it leads to an increase in the crime rate, even though
communicating with others become fast and easy.
On the one hand, technological advancements in areas of communication
have made the exchange of information among individuals rapid and
convenient. This is due to the highly sophisticated applications new mobile
devices possess . For instance , additional features such as; video and voice
recordings and cameras , enable face-to-face conversation, thus , people are
able to read non-verbal signals whilst conversing with others .
On the other hand, advances in gadgets such as ; tablets and smartphones,
have led to increased crime rates. This is because people become literate in the
usage of these devices and the knowledge obtained is used to distort
money from others. In addition, features such as locations and trackers
allow criminals to easily track their victims for various criminal activities
including murder. For example, a survey conducted in the Greater Accra
Region of Ghana revealed that about 10% of the total murder cases recorded
in 2020, were people whose mobile phones were tracked to isolated areas with
no obvious security. I agree with the statement because of the
aforementioned drawback of technological advancements.
In conclusion, as more innovations are being introduced into the world of
technology, I concur with the fact that its downsides , for instance , increased
criminal activities outweigh the merits of making communication convenient
and easy .
Some employers offer their employees subsidised
membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will
make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work.
Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the
arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and
reach a conclusion
#employers#offer#employees#membership#gyms#sports#clubs#staff#work#benefit#arguments#aspects#debate#co
nclusion

Employers are always seeking ways to enhance their employees’ productivity,


and subsidising healthy pursuits may be one way of achieving that. There are
arguments on both sides that should be taken into consideration.

On the one hand, it might be said that if workers take bonuses to visit sports
and entertainment halls,it will help them to be fitter and less stressed. Surely,
in This case, their working time will be more efficient, leading to higher levels
of output and service. Furthermore, the work and life balance of the staff will
hopefully be improved because their leisure time will be more fulfilling. These
may even be more motivating than pay increments, perks, or financial rewards
Such as incentives which may be hard to attain. Many employees who do
sports and exercises on daily basis claim that they feel healthier and more
energetic during the day and are satisfied with their job.
Conversely, the problem with leisure-based subsidies is that their efficacy is
virtually impossible to quantify. For example, with target-related payments,
employers can at least see whether the objectives are reached or not. It might
also be said that, if a budget was spent on extra training for workers or day
release programmes, the employees would achieve better career progression
and have better job prospects. These matters are all easier to measure,
especially in performance reviews and appraisals, and may even help to
reduce the risk of redundancy if the company restructures, downsizes or
outsources its workforce.

In conclusion, it seems that, while health-related subsidies are superficially


attractive, the lack of measurability is a substantial drawback. Spending funds
on ongoing training would appear to be a better use of company or Human
Resources budgets.

With the latest technological advancements, dating is now


possible online. Would you recommend online dating for your
single friends? What are the advantages and disadvantages of
online dating? Site some examples to support your answer.
#advancements#friends#site#support

Since the emergence of technology, communicating with people has


become much easy. There are now several dating websites where dates can
arrange. Despite the fact that seeing somebody online could has some
features, I believe it is not the right way to meet a partner due to its
multiple drawbacks. This essay will discuss both pros and cons of online
dating and then draw a logical conclusion.
In the beginning, helping shy people to make their first movement could be
One of the advantages of hook up websites. To clarify, many boys and girls
do not dare to ask others to go out, and the internet removes this feeling of
embarrassment as there is no face-to-face communication. For example, all
person needs to date another is to write him/ her a message. In addition,
matching with a man or a woman with the same interests might be a merit of
these online sites. Most members there have already written things they are
interested in, like subjects, sports, and personal manners, which means the
chance of finding a soul mate would increase.
However, although accompanying websites have several merits, they
have undeniable demerits. Oneof the most noticeable disadvantages can
be fake identities. To explain this, most participants use fake names and
images to protect themselves or to deceive others. For instance, Twitter has
conducted a questionnaire about using actual photos, and the result was
surprising, as 76% out of 3 million participants use artificial ones. Moving
forward, it seems to be a blind date for both individuals as they have no
previous background with each other. Therefore, there is no guarantee that
this online person would be a miscreant or gentle one

. In conclusion, online dating has both positive and negative sides. it is helpful
for sheepish individuals and those who are looking for partners sharing the
same interests; yet, dating web pages do not necessarily involve the correct
information and ensure if the person is evil or nice. Finally, I think an actual
meeting is better than an online one

As a part of their education, many students work at a


company for a short period of time without a salary. Are there
more advantages than disadvantages to this?
#part#education#students#work#company#period#time#salary

Nowadays, the majority of graduate students should go through a free


Internship in organisations before starting work. This essay will examine the
advantages and disadvantages of working for free and provide a logical
conclusion, showing that in my opinion, the benefits of an internship in a
competitive world exceed its downside. One evident benefit to getting
Work free at the beginning is that it would give the opportunity to perceive
knowledge about your job. For instance , many graduate young people have
only theoretical knowledge from their Universities whether it is law, math or
engineering. In other words, in the practical world, most part of thisknowledge
is worth nothing. As a result, after internship students get more reliable skills.
Another advantage that is working free at the beginning gives you chance to
pass the adaptation period. It means that new student would be not shy and
hesitant when he or she starts working as an employ.
Nevertheless, awareness of doing something for free is one of the principal
drawbacks. Take Kazakh studentsas an example many of them have
hindrances when they work free for a company. The thought that they can’t
overcome it will make them nervous. Secondly, for some students internship
seems like wasting time. Thusthey are not able to be productive as they work
for a salary.
To conclude, it is clear to see that an internship is a great way of developing
your skills and getting the well first part of your career. Hence, in my overall
opinion, both national and global companies should be implemented and
made mandatory for internship graduates.

Some people think that competitive sports have a positive


effect on the child’s education while others argue it is not so.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and opine
#people#sports#effect#child’s#education#opine

It is often argued by a substantial proportion of individuals think that


competitive recreations have many positive effects on children's education.
However, others believe that it is not good for toddlers. This essay will
discuss both views as far as I am in the favour of former notion.

To commence with, adolescents can effortlessly make a successful career in


physical activities. It is helping to increase mind power and concentration.
In other words, juveniles can do hard work to achieve good skills in outdoor
activities. They are becoming patient to learn this and do regular exercises
which are helping to maintain a full body. They must focus and enjoy this
game. For example, Oxford university in the USA revealed that more than one-
fifth of students have high focus power because they are playing outdoor
games regularly. They are preparing for competitive sports due to their
achievements. They should learn discipline and rules which is helping to
achieve high marks on the academic exam. Thus , it is extremely good for
adolescents' education when they learn in the right way.

In addition , the fact cannot be denied that several children are only focusing
on divertissement. They cannot focus on academic work and examinations.
Sometimes they are playing bet games. For instance , the department of
education in Australia clearly that more than two-fifths of youngsters are
playing gambling games and lost high expenditure on these activities. They
can easily learn competitive sports, but sometimes they do not achieve
success and generate money. They are trying to play in bet tournaments. As a
result, it is focusing on divertissement as compared to academic work. Sports
are creating massive disadvantages.
To conclude, unquestionably, it has both negative and positive sides when
toddlers are playing this in the correct way. They can achieve massive success
and acquire new information.

with increase in global tourism it has become obvious that


there are many advantages and disadvantages that can be
found from the effects of tourism. do you believe advantages
outweigh disadvantages?
#tourism#effects

There is a growing trend of international trips for various reasons. These trips
are beneficial for preserving nature, but there are some disadvantages too.
However, I believe that benefits are more than drawbacks. This essay will
discuss the pros and cons in detail.
On one hand, It's the biggest fact that human beings are a major threat to
nature. A large number of visitors leads to land and water pollution by
throwing litter on tourists' points. Also, these people are involved in hunting
local animals, thus , many of the world's species are either in danger or have
vanished from the earth. In Gilgit Baltistan, for example , there is a growing
concern that markhors are disappearing from mountains due tohunting,
therefore , the local government has issued a law which declared hunting
illegal and a serious crime.
On other hand, in order to appeal to tourists, many countries spend more
money on preserving and enhancing the beauty of such spots. By making
these expenses, states are getting two major benefits mainly. The first benefit
is the growing economy when foreign visitors visit local places. Another
benefit is the development of these spots when proper pathways, bridges,
roads, hotels, etc., are built. For instance, the government of Switzerland has
spent a lot on the development and maintenance of natural places, preserving
nature, provision of facilities, etc., hence, boosting tourism and the economy
of the state.
To conclude , even though, there are many pros and cons of it, a proper
investment plan should be made carefully in order to get maximum benefits.

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin


learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than
secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the
disadvantages ?
#experts#children#language#schools#school#outweigh

Some professionals argue that learning a foreign language at primary school


is better compared to secondary seminary. This trend has both merits and
demerits. I believe that despite having a few drawbacks, it has been beneficial
in numerous ways for students.

On the one hand, it is obvious that there are many significant benefits when
new terminology is taught to children from a very young age rather than
waiting for them to become older. One of the major merits is that children at a
young age have a high grasping power due to which they can learn new things
in a lesser time. For instance , a four-year-old boy may learn to operate a
mobile faster compared to a fifty-year-old lady because of the functionality of
the brain. So, if children learn a new language during their primary school
days, Then they will take less date to learn compared to higher schooling time.
Another positive that needs to be mentioned is that mastering a foreign word
can be beneficial to many students if they plan to settle abroad for job
opportunities because they will be given privilege compare to people who are
not aware of the local language. Thus, knowledge of a foreign accent can be
advantageous in many ways.
On the other hand, there are some shortcomings of this notion. The first and
obvious demerit is that learning a new sound may not be useful for those who
do not wish to move to other countries. For example, if a child is learning
French during his academy days and later if he chooses to become an IT
professional in his own country, then French would not be of any benefit to
him in his career. Another negative aspect is that a child does not possess the
required decision-making skill during his early institute days as compared to
secondary school where they can understand their field of interest. So, if they
do not choose a career in the speech field later, then it is a waste of time for
them during primary seminary. Hence, learning a non-regional expression in
primary faculty might be of less benefit.
In conclusion, although there are vivid drawbacks to this given statement, its
merits have clear victory over them because the benefits such as the addition
of knowledge and future opportunities in a different country cannot be
overlooked. Therefore, I believe that the advantages of thisphenomenon
outweigh its disadvantages.

Some people think that newspapers are the best method for
reading the news while others think other media is better.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
#people#newspapers#method#news#media
Living in an information era, people are exposed to the bombardment of News
from different sides, and choosing a way of consuming it is challenging
enough to think about. Therefore, people have different opinions about which
of its means, suchas tabloid, online publishing or TV, is better. While I agree
that there are some benefits to reading accounts in journals, I believe that
other radio sources, especially online ones, are much more effective than
conventional announcement providers in many aspects.

On the one hand, it should be acknowledged that reading magazines to


receive announcements offers several advantages. One of them is that a
paper-based way of data consumption can be healthy in many ways, especially
for the eyes of readers. This is because newspapers do not release any lights
that may affect our eyesight as mobile devices or TV screens do. At the same
time, the audience of the print press may not well suffer from constant
distraction created by advertisements while reading, Whereas those who read
online may encounter promotional posts every other minute. Last, but not
least, it is rare to see fake or misleading information in printed publications
because the content is mostly filtered thoroughly by a team of trained
professionals, suchas editors, writers and journalists, before being published.

On the other hand, I believe that the other types of media have an edge over
the community in many ways. There is no doubt that digital readers enjoy the
convenience of broadcast websites as today they can access those information
sources at the click of a button. Thisis far more time-efficient and comfortable
than print. Moreover, the followers of certain verified online media outlets on
social mediaplatforms, such as Instagram, Twitter and Facebook, mostly
receive updates in real-time. Thismust be another enormous advantage of
digital media because it allows people to hear an up-to-the-minute report
easily, while copies of periodicals take some hours to reach the hands of their
subscribers. The idea that reading accounts online is Also a painless way of
sharing them with others adds more weight to the relative effectiveness of
modern news providers over traditional ones.
It is true that reading news stories through paper-based media can reflect
many healthy, authentic and distraction-free reading merits, but this does not
mean that it is the best form of media. Instead , in my opinion, online
newssources are far more generous than them with their advantages related
to time, speed and convenience. Having said that, I believe that preferences
on this matter are subjective and therefore better to be left to news consumers
themselves to choose which one is the best.

Nowadays, more and more people have access to the Internet. But
constant availability of any information worsens people’s memory
and critical thinking skills. To what extend do you agree or
disagree?
#people#access#internet#availability#information#people’s#memory#skills

Living in the period of digitalisation and technologies, when all information

is available and the process of searching for some particular response is


simple, there is often argued that unlimited access to knowledge is
detrimental for development of individuals. In my opinion, it is indeed harmful
to humans' intellectual development, in spite of its huge contribution to
society's evolution.

In the beginning, the possibility of looking for all kind of information on the
internet, make, subconsciously, memorizing some information pointless for
our brain. It is demonstrated that people are used to forgetting all the
informationthat is easy to find online, making a difference not just in our way
of thinking, but also in brain structure, modifying forever the way people
perceive the world. For instance, there is a term, the Google effect, which is
used for describing the phenomenon of forgetting information that is easy to
google. Furthermore, As a consequence of the amount and diversity of
content found on websites, such as online calculators or essay and note
makers, a lot of young people lose their motivation and determination of
learning science and making some research by themself. Therefore, critical
thinking and problem-solving skills are harmed and not developed enough for
proper development. For example, the last year I used to help students with
middle school exam preparation, and while I was explaining some elementary
operations with exponents, a girl said something that shocked me. She said to
me that she didn't learn fundamental formulas, as she found this activity
pointless, since all the calculus could be done on the internet.
To sum up, the harmful effect of the internet, besides its numerous
advantages, is undoubted. It affects not just the attitude to studies teenagers,
as a result of the huge amount of data available, the accessibility changes the
human brain anatomically. However, the variety of information online has a lot
of benefits for contemporary people, if they maintain the balance and don't
deny the importance of training memory and critical thinking, as it is
paramount for individuals' mental health.

New technologies have changed the way children spend their


free time. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh
the disadvantages?
#technologies#children#time#trend

These days, innovations are regularly up to date to serve people living in many
areas. Consequently, kids' spare time has been spent differently. In my
opinion, I firmly believe that there are more positive than negative results due
to self-learning activities and self incomes so that they can help children
currently and in a long run.

Firstly, self-learning actions provide to young learners based on up-to-date


technology support them to study, understand, and gain more knowledge
effectively from almost all of their interested topics in their free o'clock
because they are able to access and practise it by themself, anywhere,
anytime. Thus, they have built kids' self-motivation from their interests. For
example , some K-pop dancers in Korea have learnt dancing by themself since
they were young ages from some websites, and applications Such as Youtube
and Tiktok in their free plans. Obviously, This exercise can lead kids to develop
faster and more successfully by using the latest tech during their leisure hours.

Secondly, some youngers earn money from their time off since they use their
talent and skills to give value to the community in some perspectives such as
entertainment and education. As the result, they create income at earlier ages.
For instance , in Luca's channel on Youtube that most of the videos are about
playing with toys that Luca usually uses ,and exploring new children's places.
So, he takes this chance to film and put the videos on Social Media in order to
earn funds from that. Clearly, this idea is great for spending youngth's time off.

In conclusion, inventive things are invented intentionally to support society.


Therefore, there are more advantages than disadvantages when it comes to
young kids' spare time differed on the latest tech to help with self-studying
and have their savings for now and for the future.
Some people think that children’s free time must include
educational activities otherwise they will waste their time.
What is your opinion?
#people#children’s#time#activities#waste

It is an irrefutable fact that children's spare life must be utilised for some
educational services. Some people think any activities other than these
services would be considered a waste of time. This essay will discuss the above
statement and conclude with my opinion at the end

To begin with, Some people ascertain that the scion's leisure day must be used
in whileparticipating educational activities such as critical thinking, problem-
solving skills, and participating in debates indeed. Firstly , these participations
will not only enhance students' intellectual stamina but also improve their
problem-solving skills in various ways. For instance, The Hindu published an
article, which unveils that 70 per cent of the people, who participated in
educational services have been identified as more intelligent than the rest of
the folks in their institutions. In addition, these brainstorming secessions will
improve to build their own ideas, which will use in their career, on any issues
eventually.
So, while considering all these positive signs, the majority population has
decided to engage their kids in any educational exercises, which will train
students to participate in these secessions. Consequently, learners will quickly
grab any concept during teaching. In addition, we can see more educational
institutions have adopted these actions in order to utilize students' spare time
while conducting these secessions indeed. For example, a country like The USA
has incorporated academic movements as a part of the trainer's curricula.
Secondly , these actions will not only make them psychologically stable but
Also makes juveniles must participate in many enterprises which will lead to
positive signs in order to get good results eventually.
To summarize, It is an undeniable fact that pupil must use their spare moment
in educational activities in order to improve themselves indeed in my opinion.
People have different job expectations for jobs. Some people
prefer to do the same job for the same company, whereas
others prefer to change jobs frequently.
#people#job#expectations#jobs#company#change

In this modern era of the competitive job market, every profession is


demanding these days. Majority of the people has formed a perception for
every type of role, for instance ,a government school teacher will be retired as
a school teacher or maybe a few as a Principal. Some employees feel
extremely content with their profile that they never think of changing it, on the
contrary, there are also many others who are willing to take the challenge and
likes to switch jobs often. In this essay, I will elucidate how advantages
outweigh the disadvantages.
On the constructive part, if, a person switches his job frequently, he/she gets
more exposure to the work culture. Although, hopping jobs for their selfish
motive, will arise the questions regarding the loyalty of the employee
towards their company, which will give a negative impact on the resume.
However, doing the same task becomes monotonous at some point and the
staff also starts feeling disinterested towards their designated role. As a
result, it is going to affect the productivity of the employee and the
company standing as well. Therefore, nowadays many organizations give
internal promotions and movements, so that everybody gets a chance of
doing every type of work and new creative ideas are welcomed for the
improvement.
On the destructive part, if an employee decides to continue with an
organisation throughout his lifetime. Although, there are enormous
benefits of working in a single company such as comfortable working
conditions, becomes eligible for gratuity and yearly bonus. However, there
will be no cognitive development. Moreover, the scope of getting a higher
salary will also get vanished.
To recapitulate, changing your role with different companies is different for
every person. However, I firmly believe that employees should switch their job
at least once in their life, not only because there can be a cognitive
development but also grooming will be accomplished affirmatively.
BAI 2
It is often observed that few people looking forward to their jobs choose to
change them however some employees want to work in the same
organisation. Considering the benefit of staying at the same job is strong and
long-lasting work relationships with the current organization and drawback
are limited exposure of knowledge whereas betterment of switching jobs
is to learn new technique and difficulty is reduced to the market value of job
seekers.
The utmost advantage of staying with the same firm is building a solid and
long term relationship. The reason behind this is that workers and employers
have the same goal to grow and expand their companyin future.
Therefore, employees can get senior and leadership opportunities. While
workers can learn things to a limited extent only and they have less chance of
learning new expertise when they stay at the one company. For example, My
friend, John, has been working with the same employer for the last 15 years in
a higher position having good knowledge of his company but he is less aware
of the new technology of other industries.
On the other hand, while we consider the opposite side of this scenario,
changing jobs helps in learning new skills. The reason behind this is that a
person is able to explore the environment and work cultures of the new firms.
They can not only get knowledge but also receive a higher salary by switching
to a new company. Despite the fact, workers who constantly switch their jobs
may lose their good market value because of not having long term stability
with previous organisations. That is why they may get difficulty in getting a job
in the future.
To summarise, it is asserted that working for the same organization leads to
building better relations with the employer but it is confined to minimal
learning. Yet, changing companies can enhance their skills and wages, its
downside is lowering the market value of employees.

. On one side of the argument


. To summarise, it is asserted that
. while we consider the opposite side of this scenario

. The utmost advantage of

. The utmost advantage of

BAI 3

There is no doubt that a workforce concerned debate has been escalated


since last two decades. People are expecting to have various jobs nowadays
in their entire life span. Therefore, some people contended that some civilians
like to work for the same company over the years while others prefer to switch
their workplace in a timely manner. This essay will discuss the numerous pros
and cons of the statement.

First of all, having the same jobs over the decades make people comfortable,
and role models for others. For instance, working in the same environment can
provide people not only necessary comfort but also make them goal-oriented
as well which can put them as ideal role models in front of others. In
addition, working on various platforms can improvise humans right from
enthusiastic, confident, competitive and successful. For example, as we are
living in the competitive world, 90% of workers nowadays are prioritizing to
change their jobs moderately as they are not only aware of developing above
mentioned skills but Also want to design their careers in a challenging
environment.

There are numerous disadvantages are on the table for the point of view.
Firstly, having a job in one environment can make people less career-driven
as they are comfortable with their daily routines. Additionally, This can even
decrease their confidence where they might not be ready to accept the new
challenges of life. Second of all, juggling into various places for work might
create some financial trouble at a certain extent, as per a survey , for
instance 45 out of 50 citizens are facing consequences of their decisions
regarding shifting their work. Moreover, career is also important where one
should have a certain reputation from their employer as well, switching
employers periodically might cause trouble in maintaining a good
professional manner.

In a nutshell, the pros of having the same employer include comfort and
achievements which are being contradicted by losing self-confidence as a
disadvantage. Similarly, changing jobs can improvise one with certain skills
but it counteracts by lossing professional morale.

People prefer high paid jobs as compared to job satisfaction.


Do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary era, people are eager for money. It has been
observed that inhabitants select Jobs in which they can get more money
rather than satisfaction. I strongly agree with the above-mentioned notion
since money is the essential part of happiness and handling all the expenses of
our loved ones.

Firstly , citizens do a plethora of things with the help of Money ,in order to
reduce their stress. For example, youngsters do a lot of highly paid
adventure activities and buy expensive things so that they can enjoy their
life with their near and dear ones. Unfortunately, This is the thing which
cannot be achieved with low-paid jobs. From ,This it becomes quite evident
why humans do not prefer those work in which they can get a low salary with
less work even though in these jobs they can easily balance their personal and
professional life.

Secondly, nowadays, Money is required to handle all family expenses. For


instance ,Currently everything is expensive such as children's school education
fees and family medical bills. So folks always prefer to get those jobs in which
they can get some additional benefits along with pay such as family medical
insurance although they do some extra work to get these advantages. Hence ,
This makes it clear why common people do not try to get low-salary jobs
. In summary, it is agreed that inhabitants are more interested in those Jobs in
which they can become financially strong so that they can enjoy their life and
pay utility bills for their family members.

READING : TOURISM : BLESSING OR A CURSE

In developing countries, collectively referred to as ( trung lại quy là ) the Global South, tourism is seen

as a fast and effective means of economic development. This is especially true for countries that lack

exportable natural resources, but possess plenty of natural attractions, such as beaches, mountains,

lush forests, and jungles. As a means of maximising the economic benefits for their citizens, such

countries are encouraged to capitalise on these attractions by promoting tourism and developing a

suitable tourist infrastructure. Many countries are taking up this opportunity and there has been a

noticeable tendency for developing nations to invest heavily in expanding their tourism industries. B In

reality, however, tourism can cause extensive damage to the natural world. It can therefore bring more

harm than good to the communities it is supposed to serve. Ecotourism, for example, is designed to take

advantage of a locale’s natural beauty to attract ‘green’ travellers, but ironically the environment is

often sacrificed to accommodate them. Every year, hordes of tourists flock to St. Lucia to take in its

gorgeous scenery, scuba dive among the coral reefs in its clear waters, and explore the rainforests of the

island’s interior. While well-managed scuba diving trips and excursions into the rainforest may not

directly disturb the native wildlife and flora, the resorts built to accommodate ecotourists have caused

significant increases in beach erosion, and the demand for boating transport has resulted in the loss of

mangrove swamps and increased pollution of the marine environment (Nagle, 1999). C Another problem

is the income disparity that almost always occurs as a result of tourism in underdeveloped nations. It

starts with governments investing heavily in infrastructure such as roads, airports, public transportation

and the like. The money to fund these projects comes out of taxpayers’ wallets, with the idea that the

investment will create jobs and opportunities for the local population, but that is rarely the case.
Contracts to build hotels, resorts, parks, and restaurants are often given to wealthy businesspeople who

exploit local laborers in order to increase profit margins. Then, when the establishments open, the same

pattern occurs with hired staff who work for wages barely above the minimum wage. Thus, the rich get

richer while the increasing wealth gap forces the lower socioeconomic classes into deeper poverty. D

Moreover, overseas investors make it impossible for small, local businesses to compete. International

chains are the first in line to bid for spaces on beachfront property in almost every country of the world.

They pay premium prices to secure their stronghold in developing tourist sectors. This has happened in

Costa Rica, where foreign individuals or companies own 65 per cent of hotels in the country. Therefore,

although tourism constitutes around 12.5 per cent of Costa Rica’s GDP, local businesses have not

benefited from this thriving industry

You might also like