Yadav Et Al 2020 Influence of Psychosocial Factors and Parafunctional Habits in Temporomandibular Disorders A Cross
Yadav Et Al 2020 Influence of Psychosocial Factors and Parafunctional Habits in Temporomandibular Disorders A Cross
the Helkimo Anamnestic Index) consist- Two investigators participated in the RESULTS
ing of TMD symptom-related questions study. The first investigator (UY) performed A total of 75 patients who reported
(see Sidebar: Anamnestic Questionnaire), the clinical examination of patients and with a chief complaint of pain in the
which was validated by a professor in the evaluation of the modified anamnestic TMJ region were included in the study;
Department of Community Medicine, questionnaires, and the second investigator 55 patients (80%) were women and 20
Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore. ( JA) evaluated anxiety and depression using (20%) were men. Of these 75 patients, 63
The participants were later asked to com- the HADS questionnaire in the Depart- (84%) had Angle class 1 malocclusion and
plete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression ment of Psychiatry, KMC Hospital, At- the remaining 12 (16%) had Angle class 2
Scale (HADS) questionnaire (developed tavar, Mangalore. Both investigators were malocclusion (Table 1).
by Zigmond and Snaith9 in 1983), consist- unaware of each other’s findings. The patients were divided into 6 groups
ing of 14 questions, equally distributed for by age as follows: 1) 20 years and younger,
anxiety and depression. Data Analysis 2) 21 to 30 years, 3) 31 to 40 years, 4) 41
The patients were then examined clini- Association of the role of bruxism with to 50 years, 5) 51 to 60 years, and 6) more
cally and the findings, especially the hard- the severity of TMD cases was performed than 60 years.
tissue findings (for parafunctional habits), using χ2 test. According to the DC/TMD criteria,10
were recorded in a case history pro forma. Simple linear regression analysis to patients were categorized into these 4
Palpation of the muscles of mastication predict the TMD score with the variables subgroups:
was done using the 2014 Diagnostic Cri- of age, sex, bruxism, anxiety and depres- 1. Mild TMD: Mild myofascial pain, re-
teria for Temporomandibular Disorders sion was conducted to derive the equation. curring in nature
(DC/TMD),10 followed by a thorough 2. Moderate TMD: An intra-articular
examination of the TMJ. mechanical disturbance that interfered
with a joint’s smooth action
3. Severe TMD: Signs and symptoms
of arthralgia and arthritis (clinically
Table 1. Distribution of participants with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) by age, evident joint pain with inflammation
sex, Malocclusion, bruxism, and anxiety and depression scores or swelling)
TMD free, Mild TMD, Moderate TMD, Severe TMD, Chi square 4. TMD free: Only occasional pain with
Variable no. (%) no. (%) no. (%) no. (%) value p valuea a duration of less than 1 year.
Age, y Bruxism was most prevalent among
≤ 20 1 (33.3) 4 (14.8) 8 (23.5) 1 (9.1) 16.3 0.365 women aged 21 to 30 years and 31 to
21-30 1 (33.3) 15 (55.6) 13 (38.2) 2 (18.2) 40 years (Table 1). Of 11 patients who
31-40 0 (0) 4 (14.8) 6 (17.6) 2 (18.2) had a diagnosis of severe TMD, 10 had
41-50 0 (0) 1 (3.7) 3 (8.8) 3 (27.3) bruxism, a significant finding (p = 0.001;
51-60 1 (33.3) 1 (3.7) 4 (11.8) 2 (18.2) Table 1). Our study findings revealed that
> 60 0 (0) 2 (7.4) 0 (0) 1 (9.1) the degree of TMDs increased from the
Sex youngest group to the oldest group and
Female 2 (66.7) 21 (77.8) 22 (64.7) 10 (90.9) 3.3 0.338 was significant (p = 0.04; Table 2).
Male 1 (33.3) 6 (22.2) 12 (35.3) 1 (9.1)
In the present study, female participants
had an increased degree of TMDs com-
Occlusion
pared with male participants (Table 1).
Class 1 2 (66.7) 23 (85.2) 29 (85.3) 11 (100) 2.8 0.417
Results for the anxiety and depression
Class 2 1 (33.3) 4 (14.8) 5 (14.7) 0 (0)
score revealed higher scores among the 21-
Bruxism
to 30-year age group vs other age groups
Absent 0 (0) 19 (70.4) 12 (35.3) 1 (9.1) 16.5 0.001
and an increased rate of prevalence among
Present 3 (100) 8 (29.6) 22 (64.7) 10 (90.9) female patients compared with male pa-
Anxiety score tients (Table 1).
Normal 2 (66.7) 17 (63) 13 (38.2) 3 (27.3) 9.9 0.354 In our study, patients with TMDs
Mild 0 (0) 2 (7.4) 11 (32.4) 4 (36.4) showed moderate depression scores, nota-
Moderate 1 (33.3) 7 (25.9) 9 (26.5) 3 (27.3) bly seen among women in the age group of
Severe 0 (0) 1 (3.7) 1 (2.9) 1 (9.1) 31 to 40 years. In the severe TMD group,
Depression score 12 patients had raised HADS scores and
Normal 1 (33.3) 21 (77.8) 22 (64.7) 7 (63.6) 8.2 0.221 10 had normal HADS scores, which was
Mild 2 (66.7) 5 (18.5) 11 (32.4) 2 (18.2) a clinically significant finding but not sta-
Moderate 0 (0) 1 (3.7) 1 (2.9) 2 (18.2) tistically significant (Figure 1).
Severe 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Linear regression analysis was con-
a Boldface indicates significant. ducted to derive a formula to calculate the
TMD score as follows:
The2Permanente Journal • For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2020 The Permanente Press. All rights reserved. The Permanente Journal • https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/19.144
ORIGINAL RESEARCH & CONTRIBUTIONS
Influence of Psychosocial Factors and Parafunctional Habits in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study
Table 2. Correlation of degree of temporomandibular disorder (TMDs) with age, sex, concluded that TMD primarily affects
bruxism, anxiety, and depression women, because more than 84% of those
affected were women. Bonjardim et al16
Unstandardized 95% Confidence
coefficientsa interval for B
conducted a study in 217 patients and
Standardized
found that women were more commonly
B Standard coefficients,a Lower Upper
Model 1 error β t p valueb bound bound affected by TMDs. In the present study, we
(Constant) 7.482 1.869 4.003 <0.001 3.754 11.211 found that 73.3% of patients having signs
Age 0.747 0.357 0.256 2.093 0.040 0.035 1.459
and symptoms of TMDs were women. Ac-
cording to a study by Syed et al17 in 2012,
Sex -0.608 1.039 -0.067 -0.585 0.561 -2.680 1.465
women were seen to have higher degree
Bruxism 2.335 0.927 0.286 2.519 0.014 0.486 4.184
of TMDs, attributed to higher anxiety
Anxiety 0.086 0.144 0.081 0.595 0.554 -0.202 0.373
and depression scores with the habit of
Depression -0.116 0.172 -0.094 -0.672 0.504 -0.460 0.228
bruxism. The authors state that because
a Dependent variable: TMD Score = 7.482 + 0.747 (Age) - 0.608 (Sex [male 2, female 1]) + 2.335 (Bruxism 1, 0) + 0.086 bruxism results in overuse of masticatory
(Anxiety) - 0.116 (Depression)
b Boldface indicates significant. muscles, it can eventually lead to a higher
possibility of developing TMDs.17 In the
our study, with an increase in anxiety score,
TMD score = 7.482 + 0.747(Age) - clinical criteria used among various stud- it was noticed that the degree of TMDs
0.608{Sex [Female(1)] [Male(2)} + 2.335 ies, there appears to be an irregularity in also increased.
{Bruxism [Absent(1)], Present(0)} + the literature regarding the prevalence of The results of our study reinforce the
0.086(Anxiety) - 0.116(Depression) clinical signs and symptoms. Studies have assumption that there is an association
where the score for male sex = 2 and for suggested that between 1% and 75% of between TMD and bruxism. Although the
female sex = 1, and the score for having the population showed at least 1 objec- association between psychological factors
bruxism = 0, and no bruxism = 1. tive TMD sign, and 5% to 33% reported and TMD is inconsistent in the literature,
subjective symptoms.12 there is biological plausibility for this as-
DISCUSSION A peak incidence for TMD symptoms sociation in our study.
TMDs are distinctively identified as was recorded between age 20 and 40 years, Bonjardim et al18 conducted a study
a triad of clinically apparent signs and with a lower incidence seen in younger or in 196 young adults in which 101 were
symptoms that include muscle and/or elderly patients.13 Graff-Radford et al,14 women and 95 were men. They noted that
TMJ pain, TMJ sounds, and restriction in a 1989 study, found that patients had participants who had moderate or severe
and deviation of the mouth in its open- TMDs prevalent at ages 21 to 30 years TMD exhibited class 1 malocclusion,
ing path.11 followed by above 50 years. In the present which was seen to be nonsignificant.18
The prevalence of TMD is debatable, study, among 75 patients aged between 0 Similar findings were observed in our
owing to the lack of uniformity in the and 70 years, it was noted that 80% of the study, wherein the patients with class
diagnostic criteria adapted by various in- patients had TMDs, and most of these 1 malocclusion had moderate to severe
vestigators. Evidence toward an increasing patients were in the 21- to 30-year group TMD symptoms but the results were
prevalence of TMD signs and symptoms followed by 20 years of age or younger. nonsignificant.
in the general population has been noted Esposito et al15 reviewed records of 425 Wieckiewicz et al19 conducted a study in
in several studies. Because of the dissimilar consecutive patients having TMDs. They 456 Polish university students to assess the
Figure 1. Correlation of degree of temporomandibular disorders with anxiety and depression score.
occurrence of TMDs and parafunctional habit of bruxism among patients with in women, increases with the increase in
habits and their correlation with psycho- such parafunctional habits and the start anxiety and depression scores. The existing
logical and emotional factors. Symptoms of relaxation therapy. It is important to correlation between these factors paves the
of TMDs were noticed in 246 students. A explain to the patient the background of way for preventive actions aimed at those
total of 164 female students were found to the disorders, especially the role of one’s with moderate and severe signs of TMD.
have TMDs, anxiety, and depression. The emotional stress, and to prescribe coun- An interdisciplinary approach should be
authors observed a significant correlation seling and behavioral therapy to reduce created for this population to reduce para-
between TMD and psychological prob- anxiety.20 functional habits and TMDs. v
lems. The incidence of TMD symptoms As explained in the Results section, we a Using the formula n = Zα2 p q/E2, where Zα = 95%
was seen to be higher in women, and emo- performed linear regression analysis to confidence level, p = Proportion from reference, q = 100 –
tional issues appeared to be an important derive a formula to calculate the TMD p, and E = 20/100 × p.
predisposing factor for the occurrence of score using the variables age, sex, brux-
muscular disorders.19 ism, anxiety, and depression. Association Disclosure Statement
In our study, we found that 73.3% of of the prediction of the TMD score with The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to
disclose.
patients with TMD diagnosis were female. the variables showed a significant asso-
Bruxism was more common in female pa- ciation with age (p = 0.040) and bruxism
Acknowledgments
tients than in male patients. Hence, female (p = 0.014) with anxiety and depression
Kathleen Louden, ELS, of Louden Health
patients appeared to have higher chances .However sex did not appear to play a Communications performed a primary copy edit.
of TMDs compared with male patients. significant role. In a study by Montero-
Anxiety and depression scores were seen Martín et al,21 clinical variables of pain References
to be higher in women with signs and duration and pain interference with ac- 1. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular
symptoms of TMDs. Hence, the degree tivities of daily living, as well as the bio- disorders: Implications for the investigation
of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med
of TMDs appeared to be higher in female psychosocial variables of depression and 1997;8(3):291-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045
patients with a bruxism habit and high jaw disability were used to calculate the 4411970080030401 PMID:9260045
anxiety and depression scores. TMD score. All the variables they used to 2. Weinberg LA. Temporomandibular dysfunctional
profile: A patient-oriented approach. J Prosthet
In our study we found a correlation calculate the TMD score were significant Dent 1974 Sep;32(3):312-25. DOI: https://doi.
between the degree of TMD with age, in their regression model. org/10.1016/0022-3913(74)90036-5 PMID:4530847
sex, bruxism, anxiety, and depression. The 3. Oral K, Bal Küçük B, Ebeoğlu B, Dinçer S. Etiology
of temporomandibular disorder pain. Agri 2009
degree of TMD increases from younger CONCLUSION Jul;21(3):89-94. PMID:19779999
to older age groups and is significant. The present study revealed that the 4. Bonjardim LR, Lopes-Filho RJ, Amado G,
Additionally, women have increased in- degree of TMDs is higher in the female Albuquerque RL Jr, Goncalves SR. Association
between symptoms of temporomandibular
tensity of TMDs, and the degree of TMD population and increases from younger to disorders and gender, morphological occlusion,
significantly increases in patients with the older age groups. The correlation between and psychological factors in a group of
university students. Indian J Dent Res 2009 Apr-
habit of bruxism. Finally, patients having malocclusion and degree of TMD is not Jun;20(2):190-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-
increased anxiety and depression scores significant, but the parafunctional habit of 9290.52901 PMID:19553721
appear to be more susceptible to an in- bruxism is significantly associated with a 5. Valle-Corotti K, Pinzan A, do Valle CV, Nahás AC,
Corotti MV. Assessment of temporomandibular
creased degree of TMD. higher degree of TMD symptoms. Anxiety disorder and occlusion in treated class III
The most important stage of a treatment and depression scores are higher in wom- malocclusion patients. J Appl Oral Sci 2007
protocol in TMD is education about the en, and the degree of TMDs, especially Apr;15(2):110-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-
77572007000200007 PMID:19089112
6. Molina OF, dos Santos J Jr, Nelson SJ, Grossman E.
Prevalence of modalities of headaches and bruxism
among patients with craniomandibular disorder.
Cranio 1997 Oct;15(4):314-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10
Anamnestic Questionnaire1 .1080/08869634.1997.11746026 PMID:9481994
7. Michelotti A, Cioffi I, Festa P, Scala G, Farella
Q1) Do you have difficulty in opening your mouth? Yes/no M. Oral parafunctions as risk factors for
Q2) Do you have difficulty in moving or using your jaw? Yes/no diagnostic TMD subgroups. J Oral Rehabil 2010
Mar;37(3):157-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
Q3) Do you have tenderness or muscular pain when chewing? Yes/no 2842.2009.02033.x PMID:20002533
Q4) Do you have frequent headaches? Yes/no 8. Kanehira H, Agariguchi A, Kato H, Yoshimine
Q5) Do you have neck aches or shoulder pain? Yes/no S, Inoue H. Association between stress and
temporomandibular disorder. Nippon Hotetsu Shika
Q6) Do you have pain in or about the ears? Yes/no Gakkai Zasshi 2008 Jul;52(3):375-80. DOI: https://
Q7) Are you aware of noises in the jaw joints? Yes/no doi.org/10.2186/jjps.52.375 PMID:18678971
Q8) Do you consider your bite “normal”? Yes/no 9. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety
and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand
Q9) Do you use only one side of your mouth when chewing? Yes/no 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. DOI: https://doi.
Q10) Do you have morning facial pain? Yes/no org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
PMID:6880820
10. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al;
References International RDC/TMD Consortium Network,
1. Conti A, Freitas M, Conti P, Henriques J, Janson G. Relationship between signs and symptoms of temporomandibular International Association for Dental Research,
disorders and orthodontic treatment: A cross-sectional study. Angle Orthod 2003 Aug;73(4):411–417. DOI:
https://10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0411:RBSASO>2.0.CO;2 PMID:12940562
The4Permanente Journal • For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2020 The Permanente Press. All rights reserved. The Permanente Journal • https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/19.144
ORIGINAL RESEARCH & CONTRIBUTIONS
Influence of Psychosocial Factors and Parafunctional Habits in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study
Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.6348 between symptoms of temporomandibular
Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic criteria 32 PMID:22126531 disorders and gender, morphological occlusion,
for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for 14. Graff-Radford SB, Reeves JL, Baker RL, Chiu and psychological factors in a group of
clinical and research applications: Recommendations D. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve university students. Indian J Dent Res 2009 Apr-
of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* stimulation on myofascial pain and trigger point Jun;20(2):190-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-
and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J Oral sensitivity. Pain 1989 Apr;37(1):1-5. DOI: https://doi. 9290.52901 PMID:19553721
Facial Pain Headache 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. DOI: org/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90146-2 PMID:2786179 19. Wieckiewicz M, Grychowska N, Wojciechowski K,
https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1151 PMID:24482784 15. Esposito CJ, Panucci PJ, Farman AG. Associations et al. Prevalence and correlation between TMD
11. Fricton JR, Schiffmann EL. Epidemiology of in 425 patients having temporomandibular based on RDC/TMD diagnoses, oral parafunctions
temporomandibular disorders. In: Fricton JR, Dubner disorders. J Ky Med Assoc 2000 May;98(5):213-5. and psychoemotional stress in Polish university
R, editors. Orofacial pain and temporomandibular PMID:10835837 students. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:472346. DOI:
disorders. New York, NY: Raven; 1995. p 295-303 16. Bonjardim LR, Garião MB, Pereira LJ, Castelo https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/472346 PMID:25121100
12. De Kanter RJ, Truin GJ, Burgersdijk RC, et al. PM. Anxiety and depression in adolescence and 20. Freesmeyer WB, Fussnegger MR, Ahlers MO.
Prevalence in the Dutch adult population and their relationship with signs and symptoms of Diagnostic and therapeutic-restorative procedures
a meta-analysis of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Int J Prosthodont 2005 for masticatory dysfunctions. GMS Curr Top
temporomandibular disorder. J Dent Res 1993 Jul-Aug;18(4):347-52. PMID:16052791 Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;4:Doc19.
Nov;72(11):1509-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002 17. Syed RA, Syeda AR, Katti G, Arora V. Prevalence PMID:22073067
20345930720110901 PMID:8227702 of temporomandibular joint disorders in outpatients 21. Montero-Martín J, Bravo-Pérez M, Albaladejo-
13. Anastassaki Köhler A, Hugoson A, Magnusson at Al-Badar Dental College and Hospital and Martínez A, Hernández-Martín LA, Rosel-Gallardo
T. Prevalence of symptoms indicative of its relationship to age, gender, occlusion and EM. Validation the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-
temporomandibular disorders in adults: Cross- psychological factors. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 14sp) for adults in Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir
sectional epidemiological investigations covering two 2012 Oct-Dec;24(4):261-8. Bucal 2009 Jan 1;14(1):E44-50. PMID:19114956
decades. Acta Odontol Scand 2012 May;70(3):213- 18. Bonjardim LR, Lopes-Filho RJ, Amado G,
Albuquerque RL Jr, Gonçalves SR. Association