MGDI60162 Module Guide 2023
MGDI60162 Module Guide 2023
2022/23
HRD AND
LEADERSHIP
MGDI60162
Course Unit Guide
2022/2023 Session
Semester 2
2
2. Learning outcomes and objectives
On successful completion of this course unit, students will be able to understand and critically
discuss core issues in HRD and leadership. The module aims are to develop students’ learning in
four broad categories, as briefly described below:
Understand and critically evaluate the theory and practice of leadership and
its historical and social foundations.
Understand and critically discuss comparative leadership styles and
relational leading.
Develop knowledge about HRD strategic interventions that focus on
leadership and capacity development in international organisations
including the UN and NGO/INGOs.
Understand the relationship between ethics, CSR and leadership in HRD and
development context.
Intellectual skills
Practical skills
3
3. Teaching schedule
4
4. Assessment
Important notice
For the essay, you can draw best practice examples from your professional
experiences to support your answers and arguments.
5
4.1 Marking criteria
The assessment of your assignment for this module is based on the quality of
four key criteria: research, analysis, ability to link theory and practice and
structure. These marking criteria reflect GDI’s grading standards and students’
overall score will be consistent with the GDI’s grade descriptor outlined in the
rubric shown below.
80 % +
Outstanding work in every respect. A comprehensive and complete answer that clearly
demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject and high intellectual quality.
75-79 %
Excellent work in every respect. Comprehensive and clearly demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the subject and clear intellectual quality. Indications of originality and
comprehensiveness.
70-74%
Excellent work. Demonstrates a thorough and critical understanding of the subject and
clear intellectual quality.
60-69%
Thorough, clear treatment showing a good understanding of arguments and context.
Engages with the major issues. Very good work towards the top end of the scale.
50-59%
Provides a competent discussion of relevant material and some evidence of
critical/analytical thought.
40-49%
Adequate treatment of the subject but with little critical insight. Reproduces material
covered in lectures/seminars but adds little from own investigation.
30-39%
Inadequate treatment of the subject. Barely reproduces material covered in
lectures/seminars.
20-29%
Highly inadequate work that reveals very limited knowledge of the subject. Often
irrelevant.
6
4.2 Attendance requirements
Attending all your classes is very important and one of the best ways to help you succeed
in this module. Research has found a clear correlation between student attendance and
overall performance. In accordance with the ethos of the University of Manchester and
the Global Development Institute, you are expected to arrive on time and take an active
part in all your timetabled classes and tutorials. You are also expected to attend and
engage with relevant seminars organised by SEED and GDI, especially the
Development@Manchester Seminar Series, as they will help in your personal and
professional development as well as networking.
The University of Manchester closely monitors the attendance of all students and
continued absence can result in various consequences including the termination of your
registration as you will be considered to have withdrawn from your studies.
If you are unable to attend a class for a valid reason (e.g., illness), please contact your
Module Tutors (Dr Kelechi Ekuma or Dr Natalie Cunningham) or the Module Administrator
(Mr Luke Robinson), using the contact details provided in this Guide.
7
5. Learning resources
The nature of learning for this course unit requires full engagement with the
course materials and wider reading to facilitate your own critical reflection
about your knowledge of leadership, so you can appreciate what is amiss in
your own leadership skills portfolio. However, we would not want to suggest
that there is a universal theory or dominant theory for good leadership. A key
skill that will be acquired during this module is that of taking responsibility
for your own learning and by taking a proactive, not prescriptive or a passive
approach.
Blackboard (BB) will be used for the distribution of the Module booklet and
teaching and learning materials. It will also be used as an interactive
mechanism between students and tutors, for example, to direct students to
particular readings or to provide news about the course unit or its content.
BB’s discussion board functionality will also be used to encourage knowledge
sharing and community learning and active participation in these fora will be
accredited in marking.
PLEASE NOTE: Blackboard will not be used as a repository for all course unit
learning materials. Some reports will be on BB, but this unit requires reading
beyond BB. Due to copyright reasons, we cannot put journal articles on BB.
You are advised that, once you have fully committed to this unit, it is
important that you undertake all readings assigned. Lecture slides will be put
on BB at least 48hrs before each session.
8
5.1 Readings and indicative references
Books
Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (Eds.). (2017). The nature of leadership. Sage publications.
Clarke, N. (2018). Relational Leadership: Theory, practice and development. Routledge.
Hickman, G. R. (2010). Leading change in multiple contexts. London: Sage.
Northouse, P.G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice, 9th ed. London: Sage. The older edition
(6th upwards) can also be used in the absence of the 9th edition.
Thorpe, R. Gold, J, Mumford, A. (2010). Leadership and management development. London: Gower
Publishing.
Other readings
Grint, K., Jackson, B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (2011). The Sage handbook of leadership. London: Sage.
Buchanan, D., & Badham, R. (2008). Power, politics, and organizational change: Winning the turf
game. Sage.
Head, B. and Alford, J. (2013). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management.
Administration & Society, 47(6), pp.711-739.
Klimoski, R. (2012). Context matters. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 28-32.
9
6. Note to students with disabilities
10