Page 1

1
2
3 Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission 12-6-2024
4 Email: [email protected]
5
6 COMPLAINT NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
7 Sir/Madam,
8 this is a COMPLAINT part 1 of 3 of many different issues but are all interrelated.
9
10 I am a self-educated constitutionalist and as result have a different understanding then most
11 people have. In AEC v Schorel-Hlavka (representing myself) opposing Council gave me the
12 understanding that my NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS (served upon all 9
13 Attorney-Generals) contained constitutional issues she claimed no one ever raised before. On 19
14 July 2006 the County Court of Victoria exercising federal jurisdiction upheld both my appeals
15 and neither the Commonwealth and/or any of the 9 Attorney-Generals challenged any of my
16 submissions stated in my 409 pages written submissions “ADDRESS TO THE COURT”.

17
18 There were actually 2 appeals and both succeeded.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1
2 This is a 3-part COMPLAINT, which also relies upon details provided by Dr Joseph Sansone to
3 indicate that there was a worldwide deception of a pre-planned “covid scam”.
4
5 I understand that politicians and their collaborators were involved in this elaborate “covid scam”
6
7 However, what we have is politicians for decades and even far longer since federation blatantly
8 disregarding the true meaning and application of the legal principles embedded in the
9 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)! Because I have been for decades
10 exposing many issues (of which some are referred to in this 3 part COMPLAINT) my 91-year-
11 old very ill wife and myself have been subjected to LAWFARE, etc.
12 What is needed is to reclaim our constitutional, legal, human, natural and common law rights!
13
14 https://michelchossudovsky.substack.com/p/never-new-virus-never-pandemic
15 There Never Was a “New Corona Virus”, There Never Was a Pandemic
16 The official “corona narrative” is predicated on a “Big Lie” endorsed by corrupt
17 politicians.
18
19 https://redacted.inc/newsletter/naked-burrito-june-10-2024/
20 The Lead: WHO Caught Lying About Bird Flu
21
22 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-canadian-military-saw-800-spike-in-
23 vaccine-injuries-following-covid-jab-rollout/?utm_source=daily-canada-2024-06-
24 06&utm_medium=email
25 EXCLUSIVE: Canadian military saw 800% spike in vaccine injuries following
26 COVID jab rollout
27
28 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccines-journal-covid-shot-cancer-retracted-
29 study/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=2024
30 0607
31 Why Did Journal Retract Study Showing COVID Vaccines May Cause Cancer? Emails
32 Raise New Questions
33
34 This 3-part COMPLAINT will address various issues albeit not referred to in any particular
35 order of importance.
36
37 Politicians and their collaborators lied and Australians died!
38
39 I understand that the Federal government as well as state governments paid media corporations
40 huge amounts of monies to deny Australians their right of “FREEDOM OF SPEECH”,
41 “political liberty”, “religious liberty”, etc.
42
43 There has to be legal accountability and the politicians who were cashing on of the 2% reported
44 commissions from pharmaceutical companies to pursue this murderous “covid scam” needs to
45 be investigated and held legally accountable.
46 This is needed as to seek to avoid ever a similar kind of conduct to be repeated!
47
48 The TERRORISM inflicted upon both my very ill wife and myself cannot be permitted to be
49 left as is. Those who were behind it must be held legally accountable. A failure to do so basically
50 means that those who are paid in their positions to attend to matters are essentially thumping
51 their noses on the constitution and I view by this became TRAITORS!
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1
2 Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
3 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
4 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the
5 observations to which I allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of
6 misconception.
7 END QUOTE
8
9 Hansard 19-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
10 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS:
11 This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community ought to be able to
12 understand.
13 END QUOTE
14 .
15 Hansard 21-9-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
16 QUOTE
17 The Right Hon. C.C. KINGSTON (South Australia)[9.21]: I trust the Drafting Committee
18 will not fail to exercise a liberal discretion in striking out words which they do not
19 understand, and that they will put in words which can be understood by persons commonly
20 acquainted with the English language.
21 END QUOTE
22
23 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
24 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
25 We want a people's Constitution, not a lawyers' Constitution.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 About 2 months ago my 41-year-old son revealed to me that his doctor had made known he had
29 a mere 2 months to 2 years to live. I understand he suffers from Turbo Cancer as result of 2
30 Pfizer jabs. However due to his weakness he had a fall and broke a rib and fractured another (on
31 X-ray and I understand was advised another such episode and he might merely live another
32 week.
33
34 Why is this relevant? This is because we do have a Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
35 Act 1900 (UK) and it is the criminal conduct, malfeasance, etc. that I view was why my son
36 ended up becoming a victim.
37
38 Obviously, you will need to have reliable details/information that somehow this falls within the
39 ambit of the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission to investigate. And below I intent
40 to set it all out, albeit in limited format.
41
42 Obviously, you may desire to know against whom I lodge the complaint. I will list some albeit
43 indicate that it would take reams of paper to list each and everyone and so will limit me to some
44 extend to refer to certain persons/entities albeit all and anyone who collaborated, etc should also
45 be held legally accountable.
46
47 To be able to let you follow the threat I will have to go back some decades, as this is relevant.
48
49 I with my then wife and first-born son in 1971 migrated from The Netherlands to Australia. We
50 arrived without commanding the English language and since then neither did I have any formal
51 education in the English language. I had resigned from the Royal Dutch Army due to illness and
52 was recommended by my military doctor to migrate to another country that had a climate more
53 suitable to me. This (the medical issues) is actually very relevant to what I later explain!
54
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 I in 1982 commenced to conduct a Special Lifeline Service MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS

2 PREVAIL®, always FREE OF CHARGE, even when I assisted/represented a party in
3 litigation. It became very clear to me that the was a common denominator/commonality that
4 people simply found that no matter to which politician or official they complained to generally
5 they were given some statement which turned out never to be adhered to. Often, officials later
6 claiming they never stated certain things, etc. So I urged people to make complaints in writing
7 and request a response in writing. I adhere to this principle also.
8
9 On 28 March 1984 I naturalized only to discover that instead as is required constitutionally, I
10 was given a certificate of being an “Australian citizens”. Constitutionally there is no such
11 nationality as Australians are “subject of the British Crown”, and again in my aforementioned
12 appeals I made it a constitutional issue and again neither the Commonwealth and/or any of the 9
13 Attorney-Generals challenged me on this. While I am well aware of the ruling of the High Court
14 of Australia, this I did challenge in my NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS and on 4
15 December 2002 the magistrates Court of Victoria at Heidelberg actually ordered my NOTICE
16 OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS to be heard and determined by the High Court of
17 Australia. However, this matter was also before the County court of Victoria on 19 July 2006
18 when I succeeded in both appeals unchallenged. Since than the High Court of Australia never
19 heard and determined the matter and this means it is Res Judicate. The purported Australian
20 Citizenship Act (Cth) is and remains to be ULTRA VIRES unless and until if ever at all a Court
21 of competence jurisdiction were to declare it to be INTRA VIRES!
22
23 Just to skip back a bit. I was an INDEPENDENT candidate in the 1999 Victoria and my research
24 prior to this indicated to me that the so called “state land taxation” delegated as “council rates”
25 was unconstitutional. In 2001 I was an INDEPENDENT candidate in the federal election of
26 Jagajaga and reproduce below a card I used at the time.
27

28
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1
2 Do notice the statement:
3 Did you know State land taxes & compulsory
4 voting are unconstitutional?
5
6 As for the “compulsory” voting considering I defeated the AEC in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka
7 against both charges FAILING TO VOTE (2001 & 2004) there can be absolutely no doubt I
8 succeeded in this. And as for the “State land taxation” we need to go to the matter of The
9 Municipal of Sydney v Commonwealth 1904 High Court of Australia where the Court held that
10 that a municipal council has no legislative powers and only can exercise “council rates”
11 delegated by State legislation”! As such, at the time in 1904 it was lawful for the municipal
12 council to raise “council rates” for the State by delegated powers of “State land taxation”.
13
14 When the Commonwealth was created by federation of the Colonies it was obvious that on 1
15 January 1901 the Commonwealth didn’t have any elected Members of Parliament, let alone any
16 Commonwealth legislation where first federal election needed to be held. For this the Framers of
17 the constitution made clear that until the Commonwealth commenced to legislate upon a subject
18 matter listed in Section 51 of the constitution the (newly created) States could exercise
19 “concurrent” legislative powers.
20
21 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
22 QUOTE
23 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the
24 Commonwealth legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
28 QUOTE
29 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the
30 states will nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
31 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?
32 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws
33 will, however, remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of
34 making these new laws will be all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
35 END QUOTE
36
37 Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
38 QUOTE Mr. HOWE.-
39 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
40 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
41 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in
42 the meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
43 END QUOTE
44
45 On 11 November 1910 the Commonwealth commenced to legislate as to “land taxation” and by
46 this the states no longer had “concurrent” legislative powers as to “land taxation”. As the High
47 Court of Australia in the 1943 income taxation case made clear that once the Commonwealth
48 commenced to legislate on a subject matter the States no longer could do so.
49
50 It should be understood that the States were created within Section 106 “subject to this
51 constitution” and hence the States Colonial constitutions by federation were amended for so far
52 legislative powers were transferred to the Commonwealth.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1
2 HANSARD 10-03-1891 Constitution Convention Debates
3 QUOTE
4 Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of
5 parliamentary sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark
6 on federation we throw parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer
7 supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They
8 have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their constitutions. That
9 must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament
10 under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of
11 changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the
12 parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of
13 being vested in one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary
14 sovereignty is dispensed with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring
15 into existence a powerful judiciary which towers above all powers, legislative and
16 executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter of the constitution.
17 END QUOTE
18
19 What in my research appears to have been overlooked is that the newly created States had to
20 publish in the Gazette their amended former Colonial constitution as subject to the provisions of
21 the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
22 The Supreme Court of Victoria so to say threw out of the window charges against Albert Park
23 protestors (Jeff Kennett time) because the Albert Park Racing Act had not been gazetted.
24
25 With the former Colonial Victoria Constitution Act 1855 this then became State Victoria
26 Constitution Act 1855 subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
27 but I understand it was never gazetted and as such the State of Victoria had no legislative powers
28 since federation.
29 While the State of Victoria claimed to have legislated the Victorian Constitution Act 1975 (with
30 since about 120 amendments) it must be clear that as the Victorian Parliament became a
31 “constitutional Parliament” it had no legislative powers to amend the constitution without the
32 consent of a Victoria State referendum authorising this. Hence, neither the Victoria Constitution
33 Act 1855 or the purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 have any legal validity.
34
35 This is also relevant in that the State of Victoria claimed to have enacted the “Local Government
36 Act” this somehow as to provide the “councils” some sort of powers. Constitutionally this is
37 absurd. This, because the States couldn’t create a additional level of Government called “local
38 government’ when constitutionally the States were “local government” and the Commonwealth
39 was the “central government’.
40 I understand that in ATO v Melton the Court allegedly held that a council didn’t have to pay
41 GST. Firstly I view that the GST legislation [A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act
42 1999 (GST Act)] is unconstitutional.
43
44 Hansard 20-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
45 QUOTE Mr. HIGGINS:
46 Laws imposing taxation, except laws imposing duties Customs on imports, shall deal with
47 one subject of taxation only.
48 What is meant by one subject of taxation? Suppose a land tax is imposed, you tax posts
49 and rails. That may be argued not to be a law dealing with one subject.
50 END QUOTE
51

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 7

1 Here Mr. Higgins make clear that rails and post are 2 different items and as such not one subject.
2 We now find that the Commonwealth applies GST for goods to be imported even so it is a
3 different form of taxation subject matter where as that which was manufactured in Australia.
4 Indeed, as shown below “import” taxation can be enforced against the state. As such, it is absurd
5 to have a “import taxation” as well as GST” being applicable to one product imported.
6
7 In 2010 I had printing work forwarded to me from overseas and well Customs made clear I
8 would have to pay GST on the items before being released to me. Well, I write them a 43-page
9 response and then I was advised the boxes had been released without any GST payment required.
10 Reality of this utter and sheer nonsense was that I had ordered the printing from a company
11 operating in Australia and had been charged GST. This company then let an overseas printer
12 perform the job and then send it to me. How on earth can I be charged a second time GST when
13 already having prepaid it when I placed the order? Surely, where the printing company has the
14 items printed possibly pending printing capacity is not my issue?
15 Meaning the Commonwealth is defrauding Australians where they have already paid GST for
16 goods and then get charged again for GST for the same goods that already had included GST
17 charges.
18
19 Hansard 20-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
20 QUOTE
21 Mr. GLYNN: I think the last few words of this clause are too comprehensive in their
22 meaning. In South Australia there is a lot of land which is leased with the right of
23 purchase, and I can see that under the latter portion of this clause there is considerable
24 danger of defeating the effect of direct taxation.
25 Mr. O'CONNOR: In a case of that kind the reversion which is in the Crown would
26 not be taxed, but the letting value would be taxed.
27 Mr. BARTON: I might mention that the property of the Commonwealth in that land is
28 the reversion upon the lease. The reversion upon the lease would not be [start page 1002]
29 taxable, but the interest of the lessee in the property would be taxable.
30 Mr. GLYNN: I am only pointing out a difficulty that might arise.
31 Mr. HENRY: I would like to raise a question as to the right of the Commonwealth
32 to tax materials for State purposes. In the event of a colony importing rails,
33 machinery, engines, &c., for State purposes, I would like to know whether such
34 exports are to be free from Customs duties. Will the Federal Parliament have a right
35 to levy duties on materials imported for State purposes?
36 Mr. BARTON: This is a matter that was discussed very fully in the Constitutional
37 Committee, and I think my hon. friend Sir George Turner will remember that I consulted
38 the members of the Finance Committee upon it, intimating to them the opinion of the
39 Constitutional Committee on the point. The words:
40 Impose any tax on property
41 do not refer to the importation of goods at all, and any amendment to except the Customs
42 would be unnecessary. This clause states that a State shall not, without the consent of the
43 Parliament of the Commonwealth, impose taxation on property of any kind belonging to
44 the Commonwealth, meaning by that property of any kind which is in hand, such as land
45 within the Commonwealth. That has no reference to Customs duties.
46 Sir GEORGE TURNER: Will articles imported by the States Governments come in
47 free?
48 Mr. BARTON: The question then arises whether articles imported by the States
49 Governments are to come in free, but this section has nothing to do with that. Under
50 this Bill and in the measure of 1891 I believe duties would have been collectable upon
51 imports by any State, and after the consultation which I had with the hon. member

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 8

1 and his colleagues on the Finance Committee the Constitutional Committee decided
2 not to make any exemption in the case of any State.
3 END QUOTE
4
5 Again:
6
7 Mr. BARTON: The question then arises whether articles imported by the States
8 Governments are to come in free, but this section has nothing to do with that. Under
9 this Bill and in the measure of 1891 I believe duties would have been collectable upon
10 imports by any State, and after the consultation which I had with the hon. member
11 and his colleagues on the Finance Committee the Constitutional Committee decided
12 not to make any exemption in the case of any State.
13
14 Therefore, it must be absolutely clear that a State or any State entity cannot escape having to pay
15 import duties.
16 And this brings us back to the Shire of Melton issue where somehow the Court approved that
17 Melton didn’t have to pay GST.
18
19 Moment, being it Melton Shire or any other council they are ‘municipal corporations” and have
20 no legislative powers. They are operating as “corporations” and as such as much liable to pay
21 taxation as any other corporation. The ATO cannot exclude anyone from any taxation unless
22 within constitutional context has been provided for in legislation.
23
24 HANSARD 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
25 QUOTE Mr. GORDON.-
26 The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on
27 the Constitution we will have to wipe it out."
28 END QUOTE
29 .
30 Hansard 16-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
31 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS (Victoria).-
32 In the next sub-section it is provided that all taxation shall be uniform throughout the Commonwealth.
33 An income tax or a property tax raised under any federal law must be uniform "throughout the
34 Commonwealth." That is, in every part of the Commonwealth.
35 END QUOTE
36 .
37 Hansard 19-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
38 QUOTE
39 Mr. MCMILLAN: I think the reading of the sub-section is clear.
40 The reductions may be on a sliding scale, but they must always be uniform.
41 END QUOTE
42 And
43 Hansard 19-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
44 QUOTE
45 Sir GEORGE TURNER: No. In imposing uniform duties of Customs it should not be necessary for the
46 Federal Parliament to make them commence at a certain amount at once. We have pretty heavy duties in
47 Victoria, and if the uniform tariff largely reduces them at once it may do serious injury to the colony. The
48 Federal Parliament will have power to fix the uniform tariff, and if any reductions made are on a
49 sliding scale great injury will be avoided.
50 END QUOTE
51 .
52 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
53 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
54 But it is a fair corollary to the provision for dealing with the revenue for the first five years after the
55 imposition of uniform duties of customs, and further reflection has led me to the conclusion that, on the
56 whole, it will be a useful and beneficial provision.

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 9

1 END QUOTE
2 And
3 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
4 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
5 On the other hand, the power of the Commonwealth to impose duties of customs and of excise such as it may
6 determine, which insures that these duties of customs and excise would represent something like the average
7 opinion of the Commonwealth-that power, and the provision that bounties are to be uniform throughout
8 the Commonwealth, might, I am willing to concede, be found to work with some hardship upon the states
9 for some years, unless their own rights to give bounties were to some extent preserved.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 Hansard 31-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates
13 QUOTE Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH:
14 2. Customs and excise and bounties, but so that duties of customs and excise and bounties shall be uniform
15 throughout the commonwealth, and that no tax or duty shall be imposed on any goods exported from one
16 state to another;
17 END QUOTE
18
19 Hansard 11-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
20 QUOTE The CHAIRMAN.-
21 Taxation; but so that all taxation shall he uniform throughout the Commonwealth, and that no tax or duty
22 shall be imposed on any goods passing from one state to another.
23 END QUOTE
24 .
25 Hansard 22-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
26 QUOTE
27 Mr. BARTON.-I am saying now that I do not think there is any necessity for clause 95 in its present form.
28 What I am saying however, is that it should be made certain that in the same way as you provide that the
29 Tariff or any taxation imposed shall be uniform throughout the Commonwealth, so it should be
30 provided with reference to trade and commerce that it shall be uniform and equal, so that the
31 Commonwealth shall not give preference to any state or part of a state. Inasmuch as we provide that
32 all taxation, whether it be customs or excise duties, or direct taxation, must be uniform, and inasmuch
33 as we follow the United States Constitution in that particular-in the very same way I argue that we should
34 protect the trade and commerce sub-section by not doing anything which will limit its effect. That is the real
35 logical position.
36 END QUOTE
37
38 It must be very clear that on a “sliding scale” this means everyone must be charged the same on a
39 taxable income level.
40 The ‘not-for-profit’/non-profit’ businesses cannot avoid paying taxes as they too must be held
41 (that is constitutionally) accountable as any other business. For sure, the Commonwealth can
42 legislate as to certain taxation deductions, such as spending on charities, etc, but then it still must
43 require such business to declare its claimed deductions.
44 Political parties cannot be excluded from paying taxation either, as that would violate
45 constitutional requirements of a “sliding scale”.
46
47 Getting back to the “land taxation”, the State of Victoria (and I suspect other states likewise)
48 failed as it appears to me to publish in the Gazette the new State constitution Act 1855 as
49 amended by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and hence never was
50 valid, and the Old Colonial Constitution Act 1855 neither remained valid at time of federation.
51
52 Barry Collier MP referred to that there was “concurrent power” but that was wiped out when the
53 commonwealth on 11 November 1910 commence to legislate as to “land taxation”. As for that
54 the States got the powers to legislate back, there is no such constitutional provision as the
55 Framers of the Constitution made clear once Caesar makes a decision then always remains to be
56 so.

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 10

1
2 37-0114 No 1
3 QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the
4 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011
5 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+
6 Barry+Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+M
7 arch+2011+claimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding
8 +land+taxation+returned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+con
9 stitution+doesn’t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Commonwealth+po
10 wer+back+to+the+States%3F
11 Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the
12 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative
13 powers regarding land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when
14 the constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive
15 Commonwealth power back to the States?
16
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 11

1 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:

2 Answer:
3 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation
4 returned to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism to
5 transfer exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States. The Australian
6 Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers between the Commonwealth and
7 the States, and any changes or transfers of powers would require formal amendments
8 to the Constitution through specific processes outlined in Section 128.
9 The Australian Constitution establishes a federal system of government where certain
10 powers are allocated exclusively to the Commonwealth Parliament under Section 51,
11 including taxation. Land taxation falls under this category of powers exclusively
12 vested in the Commonwealth. While there are provisions for concurrent powers and
13 areas where both levels of government can legislate, matters related to land taxation
14 are generally within the domain of the Commonwealth.
15 Any assertion that States could unilaterally reclaim legislative authority over land
16 taxation without a constitutional amendment would be legally unfounded and
17 contrary to the established framework of federalism in Australia. Therefore, unless
18 there is a formal amendment to the Constitution or a change in legislation at the
19 federal level, States do not have the authority to independently control land taxation.
20 In summary, based on the existing constitutional framework and principles of
21 federalism in Australia, it is not feasible for States to regain legislative powers over
22 land taxation without proper constitutional amendments or legal mechanisms.
23 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
24 1. Australian Constitution
25 2. Legal Principles of Federalism in Australia
26 3. Division of Powers between Commonwealth and States
27 These sources were consulted to provide accurate information on the distribution of
28 legislative powers in Australia’s federal system and how changes or transfers of such
29 powers would need to adhere to constitutional provisions.
30 Web Search Results
31 5 results
32
33
34 Barry Collier (politician)
35 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Barry_Collier_(politician)
36 Barry Collier (politician)
37 He was a Labor Party member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1999
38 to 2011 and from 2013 to 2015, representing the electorate of Miranda.
39
40 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW
41 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › la › department › Documents › department-of-the-
42 legislative-assembly-annual-report-for-2009-2010 ›
43 LA%20Annual%20Report%20200910.pdf
44 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW
45 parliamentary recess between december 2010 and the march 2011 election should provide
46 staffing resources to complete some of these projects.
47
48 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
49 https//api.parliament.nsw.gov.au › api › hansard › search › daily › pdf › HANSARD-1820781676-64586
50 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 12

1 Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Amendment (Heavy Vehicle Registration Charges)

2 Bill 2009. State Revenue Legislation Amendment (Defence Force ...
3
4 Committee Secretary 5-6-2011 Joint ...
5 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees › house_of_representatives_committees
6 Committee Secretary 5-6-2011 Joint ...
7 This did not have the effect of preventing the. States from imposing land tax, but rather
8 returned taxation powers back to them. Accordingly ...
9
10 House of Representatives Official Hansard
11 https//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu › document
12 House of Representatives Official Hansard
13 House of Representatives Officeholders. Speaker—The Hon. David Peter Maxwell
14 Hawker MP. Deputy Speaker—The Hon. Ian Raymond Causley MP.
15 END QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW
16 on 2 March 2011
17
18 Obviously, the Commonwealth cannot claim that the councils were collecting “land taxation” on
19 its behalf this as all taxation must be “uniform” throughout the Commonwealth of Australia, and
20 the so called “council rates” are not. I own properties in both Buloke Shire Council and Banyule
21 City Council and no matter my past writings about “council rates” based on State land taxation
22 being unconstitutional they nevertheless continued to charge this purported “council rates”.
23
24 It must be understood this is a federal issue!
25
26 Banyule City Council started then a reign of terror upon my wife and myself.

27
28

29
30
31 On 6 September 2023 Banyule City Council employees trespassed upon our property, and
32 caused damages. It is trespassing when it is not authorised by my wife and myself and neither
33 did Banyule City Council obtain a WARRANT as to enter property.

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 13

1 On 7 September 2023 Banyule City Council then trespassed upon our neighbouring property and
2 then climbed over the fence to gain access to our property. Entered a gazebo and went to the
3 back of the property and then started to take photo’s, etc. Subsequently again entered the gazebo
4 and climbed over the fence trespassing again also upon our neighbours property. And seemingly
5 not satisfied with this then went about to vandalise my wife’s station wagon that was lawfully
6 parked in front of our property. This vandalised really did upset my wife. She was then 909 years
7 old and suffers from heart failure and other comorbidities and Banyule City Council was well
8 aware of this due to past correspondences.
9 I subsequently received a 25 October 2023 demand from “beckslegal” lawyers claiming that
10 Banyule City Council was their client and that the Fire Rescue Victoria had issued a reports as to
11 a fire danger. I requested a copy of the alleged report but none was provided. I then contacted
12 Fire Rescue Victoria for a copy of the report but none was provided. As such, I took it there
13 never was a report. It was a false claim to try to justify the trespassing by Banyule City Council
14 employees.
15
16 But worse was to come!
17
18 On 29 November 2023 My wife called out to me that someone was trying to break in and I asked
19 her to measure her blood levels, etc, and her heart rate had gone up from 72 to 122. As such
20 placing her life in danger.
21 I went out and located two Banyule City Council employees in our backyard and the when I
22 asked her name, she merely provided a purported NOTIFICATION TO NOTICE TO ENTER
23 with her name Angela O’Brien. I asked how they came into our yard and she gave me the
24 understanding having climbed over the fence. I made clear they were trespassing.
25 Days later I received another NOTIFICATION TO NOTICE TO ENTER via mail.
26 Due to the fear and shock my wife then lost her ability to balance herself and since then relies
27 upon using a wheelchair. It must be clear that this was uncalled physical harm caused upon my
28 wife without any legal justification.
29
30 Subsequently, I received yet another NOTIFICATION TO NOTICE TO ENTER referring to 3
31 January 2024. On that day I arranged for a person to video tape anyone trespassing and well a
32 Banyule City council employee was against trespassing on neighbouring property and then
33 taking photographs or other images of my property and then went also to 109 Graham Road and
34 there the owner caught him at the fence taking photos of our property and he then claimed he had
35 an appointment with us. This even so there was never any appointment. The videos show that
36 this Banyule City Council employee actually walked along the footpath in both directions along
37 our front gates without even any attempt to ring the bell at the front gates. If there was an
38 appointment as he had claimed then surely, he would have first of all attempted to ring the bell at
39 the gate!
40
41 In 2008 Banyule City Council targeted me for have exceeding 3-hour parking limit even so by
42 their own recording I had been parked 2 hours and 29 minutes! So they finally, after first
43 refusing, withdrew their Infringement Notice.
44 In 2010 while I was an INDEPENDENT candidate in the state election for Ivanhoe councillor
45 Anthony Carbines used Banyule City Council employee to remove and destroy my election
46 banners. The police did attend to notice the damages, etc.
47
48 They started to target our property since 2018 with aerial photos and then claimed I was
49 violating a “permit” this even so neither my wife (since she moved into Banyule City Council
50 residence at 107 Graham Road) or myself never had any application of any “permit”.
51
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 13 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 14

1 And Banyule City Council yet provided another demand and the way this is going I could face
2 more as long as I live.
3
4 And I will not ignore Buloke Shire Council its problem making conduct as it too has been
5 causing problems.
6
7 It must be clear that the issue of the unconstitutional “council rates” and my refusal in 2023 to
8 pay anything as they ongoing over many years ignored my objections clearly so to say is some
9 kind of payback.
10
11 But there is a lot more to it.
12
13 My wife on 2 October 2019 attended to a cardiologist (after having had many test) and he as I
14 understand it made known to my wife that she had nothing to worry about. However, on 10
15 October 2019 I urged my wife to let me take her to a hospital as I was concerned something was
16 wrong with her. OK I never had any medical or science training and my wife reminded me that
17 her cardiologist had made clear she was all right. In the end she agreed to go to hospital. At the
18 hospital the ICU nurse placed my wife under all kinds of monitors, etc. The doctor then informed
19 me that my wife would have died within a few hours had I not presented her as her lungs were
20 filled with fluid, etc. My wife was 10 days in hospital.
21
22 And well, in January 2020 it was all about this claimed SARS-CoV-2 (covid-19 virus) and I
23 realised that I needed to protect my wife and better research what I could.
24 I downloaded the alleged sequence the Chinese had provided to scientist, and also downloaded
25 videos where a British female scientist claimed to have in a mere 2 hours established the covid-
26 19 vaccine. In another video she claimed it was 3 hours. Peter Doherty Institute as I understood it
27 claimed in January 2020 to have had 6 sequences of people infected with covid.
28
29 As I referred to from onset I resigned from the Royal Dutch Army due to health issues, and I
30 realised that I could be very vulnerable with the alleged covid-19 virus and so I better for this
31 also concentrate upon what is really going on.
32
33 As I am a self-educated constitutionalist it was to me rather strange that the States were
34 implementing MANDATES as in my view the States lacked any legislative, executive and/or
35 administrative powers regarding any “man-kind” infectious diseases for which QUARANTINE
36 measures were to be taken.
37
38 I am aware that the High court of Australia in Palmer v WA claimed that the States had powers
39 but that was completely wrong, this as the court concealed the true intentions of the Framers of
40 the constitution such as:
41
42 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
43 Convention)
44 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
45 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
46 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
47 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
48 END QUOTE
49
50 One will not find this in the ruling of the High Court of Australia!
51

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 15

1 As the Commonwealth commenced with the Quarantine Act 1908 legislation, this means that the
2 States since then no longer had any legislative powers as to “man-kind” infectious diseases.
3 Later this was superseded by the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth). Yet, despite of this the State of
4 Victoria (as an example) ignored this and issued the MANDATES.
5

6
7
There never was a covid-19 pandemic!
8
9
There never was a SARS-CoV-2 virus!
10 QUOTE 20240608-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Banyule City Council, Cr Mayor Tom Melican and
11 Ors
12 Banyule City Council & Mayor Cr Melican & Ors (Australia, Victoria date) 8-6-2024
13 [email protected]
14
15 Cc:
16 Cr Tom Melican Mayor [email protected] Cr Alison Champion [email protected]
17 Cr Fiona Mitsinikos [email protected] Cr Elizabeth Nealy [email protected]
18 Cr Mark Di Pasquate [email protected] Cr Alida McKern [email protected]
19 Cr Peter Dimarelos [email protected] Cr Rick Garotti [email protected]
20 Cr Peter Casteldo [email protected] Jan Richardson [email protected]
21 Janet Redgrave Team Leader Dev.Plan. [email protected] Mr RomanWojtkowski [email protected]
22
23 Re: 20240608-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Banyule City Council Mayor Cr Tom Melican and Ors
24
25 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
26 COMPLAINT
27 Sir & Ors,
28 as shown below, the courts have ruled that this purported “covid-19 vaccine” actually
29 is not a vaccine at all but a “medical treatment”, and as only qualified medical practitioners
30 may provide for a “medical treatment” then what lawful authority did any council’s health
31 department, etc, have to terrorise business owners about the FAKE covid-19 vaccine?
32
33 Also, what business was and is it of Banyule City Council that I was purchasing and then
34 transporting material for renovations of my Berriwillock property? Sending me a correspondence
35 of DEMAND by “becklegal” that I have to remove items that my son and I just had purchased,
36 such as 100mm water tubing, allegedly as being a fire danger, is totally absurd! So, is Banyule
37 City Council now ordering that every property must remove 100 mm sewerage tubing? And for
38 that you were terrorising us, trespassing, causing property damage including vandalising a
39 lawfully parked motor vehicle, STALKING, causing physical harm to my wife who Banyule
40 City Council was well aware suffers from heart failure and other comorbidities. and a lot more?
41
42 When I was a single parent and took my toddler daughter to kinder and showed all children how
43 to make plaster figurines and paint them those toddlers in my view seemed to be more intelligent
44 than the lot in Banyule City Council.
45 I do not need to prove to Banyule City Council anything, but if needed can prove in a court of
46 law that whatever I possess is lawfully purchased and I do not need to prove if I did or didn’t sell
47 anything, this as it would be for Banyule City Council to prove I was selling items. If it cannot
48 and yet engaged in serious criminal conduct not warranted by law then obviously Banyule City
49 Council will be held legally accountable. Its failure/refusal to stop its criminal activities would
50 be in my view of serious concern of any court of competent jurisdiction and would indicate that
51 this was indeed a deliberate ongoing persecution (lawfare) for ulterior purposes.
52
53 While Banyule City Council might have acted because of my exposure of unconstitutional
54 conduct by Banyule City Council and others this in itself cannot be any excuse.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 15 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 16

1 There can be no question about it that some residents left their caravans/trailers parked in the
2 street, and they are lawfully entitled to do so when their caravan/trailer are registered. After all
3 they are paying registration fees for them. The same with a motor vehicle. In my view
4 councillors would have done better to spend their time and attention as to the FAKE “covid-19
5 vaccines” which caused considerable harm upon many residents. It obviously questions who
6 really is in charge of a council when seemingly every Tom, Dick and Harry does its own thing
7 and no one bothers (despite my many complaints) to actually consider what is lawful and avoid
8 criminal conduct by council officers.
9
10 QUOTE 20240608-MrG. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to ESa lawyers
11 ES&a lawyers (Australia, Victoria date) 8-6-2024
12 C/o Basil L Stafford LLB
13 Email: [email protected]
14
15 Cc: Cr Alan Getley (Mayor) [email protected] Cr David Pollard [email protected]
16 Cr Carolyn Stewart [email protected] Cr Bernadette Hogan [email protected]
17 Cr Graeme Milne (Dep Mayor) [email protected] Cr B Simpson [email protected]
18 Cr Daryl Warren [email protected] Penelope Grant Revenue Officer [email protected]
19
20 Re: 20240608-MrG. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to ESa lawyers
21
22 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
23 Sir/Madam,
24 in early 2020 I started to prepare for an almighty litigation against politicians and
25 their collaborators about the “covid scam”. I had absolutely no doubt that this was an advance
26 planned scam and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) did not permit
27 the kind of conduct that was implemented, such as the MANDATES, etc. Obviously, it is one
28 thing to prepare in advance for a litigation but another to get the “evidence”.
29 I know too well from litigation over many decades that at time you can create your own evidence
30 by writing to intended opposing parties and more often than not they may not respond. Then later
31 when in court they desire to respond when faced with the details they never responded upon only
32 I then successfully opposed any adjournment.
33 A few decades ago, I was at the (court) bar table and called out a woman who was the opponent
34 for faking the need for a wheelchair. She had been attending in numerous courts always in a
35 wheelchair. OK, the trial judge didn’t take it kindly and warned me that if I persisted in this then
36 he would issue an order for the woman to present a medical certificate and then it would go
37 against me if she did. Well, her Counsel filed not only a medical certificate but also 11
38 Affidavits. Oh boy, did the trial judge lag into me for having dared to accuse this woman for
39 faking the need for a wheelchair as clearly, she had a medical certificate and well, he gave me an
40 opportunity to respond. I asked: “Your Honour can you explain to me if VET means a
41 veterinarian”. The judge looked at the medical certificate and then asked opposing Counsel, is
42 that medical certificate issued by a veterinarian? Counsel for the woman then responded that her
43 GP refused to issue a medical certificate and so she got the Veterinarian instead to issue a
44 medical certificate but he now withdrew the medical certificate and all 11 Affidavits.
45 Ok, you now may understand that it was established that a VET (veterinarian) cannot act as
46 being a qualified medical doctor, as such cannot act as a medical practitioner dealing with
47 humans! A person can obtain a Phd and called a doctor, but is not a medical doctor and cannot
48 practice as a medical doctor regarding human diseases. The same with a person who
49 successfully studied to be a lawyer. The person can be a lawyer, but cannot practice law unless
50 admitted to the Bar of the Supreme Court.
51 Ok, you may now get to understand that a veterinarian cannot dictate medical issues
52 regarding humans. Perhaps you may now question your client, Buloke Shire Council, why it
53 enforced MANDATES since 2020?
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 16 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 17

1
2 The head of the United Nations (UN) is not a qualified medical doctor!
3 The head of the World Health Organisation (WHO) is a veterinarian, not a qualified medical
4 doctor!
5 The head of World Economic Forum (W.E.F.) is not a qualified medical doctor.
6 The Federal Minister for heals was Greg Hunt not being a qualified medical doctor!
7 The Prime minister is not a qualified medical doctor.
8 The TGA John Skerrit neither was a qualified medical doctor.
9 The Premier of Victorian then being Daniel Andrews was not a qualified medical doctor.
10 The Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton was not a qualified medical doctor.
11 The various Victorian Ministers for Health were not qualified medical doctors.
12
13 And yet they all somehow dictated that all Victorians had to be injected with the (FAKE)
14 COVID-19 vaccine that really was a “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION “bioweapon”, etc.
15 One specialist, who was a qualified medical doctor, urged my wife to have the covid vaccination.
16 I asked him if he could explain what the risk were in view that my wife suffers from heart failure
17 and other comorbidities and well his response was; he didn’t know but it was MANDATED. I
18 then explained to him what the risk were for my wife and his response was “You are very
19 intelligent.”. Well, we didn’t attend for him to tell me that.
20 My wife changed specialist.
21
22 So, we had the medical profession doing what they were told by unqualified persons!
23
24 And even at a public hospital when a medical doctor was going on about the alleged covid
25 vaccine they also were making known they were simply told and didn’t know relevant details.
26 Yet one made known (December 2021) that the hospital already had injected some 800,000
27 citizens.
28
29 Remember the MANDATES that prevented travelling more than 5 KM?
30
31 Well recently the former Minister of Health Greg Hunt (former Director for W.E.F.) made
32 known he didn’t know Victoria had a 5km restriction MANDATE, etc. This, even so by the
33 Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) he cannot delegate his powers!
34
35 Well, ask your client on what medical advise it pursued its employees to be jabbed with the
36 “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION “bioweapon”?
37 A recent published study provided:
38

39
40 Video: “Proof” (Dr John Campbell- Re excess deaths)

41
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 17 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 18

1
2 Yes, the report indicates a 36% more chance to have serious adverse events in the vaccine
3 group then those in the placebo group.
4
5 And let us not ignore either that the Chinese sequence published in January 2020 of the alleged
6 patient zero, actually never was as it turned out it was what a computer selected from different
7 sequences and by putting together parts of different sequences to create this purported sequence
8 of patient zero. Actually, Peter Doherty Institute, Melbourne, who had I understand claimed to
9 have had 6 sequences of patient’s way back in January 2020 later admitted they never actually
10 isolated and purified any virus according to the Koch postulate.
11 There never was a covid-19 virus! It was simply influenza and other illnesses which were re-
12 labelled covid-19 and that was planned more than 10 years earlier with LockStep 2010!
13
14 So, your client participated in the advance planned mass-murder without bothering to challenge
15 this whatsoever!
16 And your client somehow expect me to pay towards the horrendous harm it caused upon many?
17
18 And, let not forget the video “Fauci ADMITS Masking & Social Distancing Rules Were
19 MADE UP!” by Jimmy Dore.

20
21

22

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 18 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 19

2
3
4 There is a lot more to it all!
5
6 A “MEDICAL TREATMENT” cannot be prescribed by a vetinerian or unqualified persons not
7 being a qualified medical doctor and as such where the couryt held “makes the COVID jab
8 a medical treatment, not a vaccine” then only a qualified medical doctor can prescribed
9 such medical treatment and obviously not because of any claimed MANDATES, but upon a
10 medical assessment of each particular person that of each patient this is an appropriate “medical
11 treatment”,.
12
13 https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/9th-circuit-court-rules-covid-19?utm_source=post-email-
14 title&publication_id=1103773&post_id=145428446&utm_campaign=email-post-
15 title&isFreemail=true&r=1a0316&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
16 9th Circuit Court Rules COVID-19 mRNA Injections Are NOT Legally Vaccines
17 "The right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is entirely consistent with this Nation’s
18 history and constitutional traditions and the case merits are sufficient to invoke that
19 fundamental right."
20 QUOTE
21 Announcing this huge win on behalf of their clients, Health Freedom Defense Fund
22 issued a press release, stating that the case was won;
23 “On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the Supreme
24 Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit
25 on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In
26 Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination
27 mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.
28 The majority, however, noted that HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the COVID jabs
29 are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 but

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 19 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 20

1 only purport to mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its
2 complaint, makes the COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.
3 The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of
4 disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based
5 on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the
6 jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject
7 to, and survives, the rational basis test.”
8 The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which
9 the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient
10 rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority
11 concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.”
12 When HFDF asked the court to opine as to whether or not the CDC’s claim that the
13 COVID-19 vaccines were ‘safe and effective’, the court responded with the rhetorical
14 question, “safe and effective for what?”
15 END QUOTE
16
17 Since the “covid scam” commenced I then already urged that no one should have any kind of
18 vaccination unless the person was medically assessed and had a blood test done so the medical
19 practitioner (that is a qualified medical doctor) could assess if any vaccination was appropriate.
20
21 As the FAKE covid-19 vaccine, as I exposed years ago was no more but a “gene therapy”
22 DEPOPULATION “bioweapon” to pursue mass murder then
23
24 The same is with any other kind of so called vaccinations that are claimed to be “safe and
25 effective” without generally any scientific basis they are as such.
26
27 In 2020 the MANDATES included not to travel more than 5 km, and as such I was prevented to
28 travel to Berriwillock. Many others who travelled for a hefty fine! I had to rely upon a friend to
29 assist with looking after my property. Likewise, in 2021 and 2022.
30
31 Buloke Shire Council as a “Law Enforcement Agency” didn’t enforce the law but rather violated
32 the law to enforce MANDATES in a harmful manner to residents and its own employees all
33 because NON-QUALIFIED persons dictated this!
34
35 Remember the scare mongering by then Premier of Victoria Daniel Andrews, making clear he
36 was not interested in people claiming human rights but he was to save people, etc?
37 Remember him claiming that the unvaccinated were a danger for the vaccinated and should be
38 denied to access certain venues, etc?
39 Remember, the so-called council health departments closing down shops and insisting that hair
40 dressers had to be vaccinated or be closed down?
41
42 https://vigilantnews.com/post/ex-cdc-director-drops-covid-
43 bombshell/?omnisendContactID=64e46a7c187c178b19a2c495&utm_campaign=campaign%3A+
44 Vigilant+Fox+Daily+Digest+%5B06%2F07%2F2024%5D+%2866630fa926971a58281a73af%2
45 9&utm_medium=email&utm_source=omnisend
46
47 Ex-CDC Director Drops Stunning COVID
48
49 Video:
50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMlhvnMpRU0&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2
51 Fvigilantnews.com%2F&feature=emb_imp_woyt
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 20 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 21

1 QUOTE
2 Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director under the Trump administration, says there
3 was a “huge influence by the pharmaceutical industry” to get everyone
4 vaccinated.
5 Dr. Redfield wanted to prioritize shots for the elderly, but “that’s not what happened.”
6 What’s also disturbing is that when the Biden administration came in, the CDC “stopped
7 tracking people that were infected that were previously vaccinated.”
8 Former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo asked Dr. Redfield why the health agency would do
9 such a thing. Dr. Redfield’s response was eye-opening.
10 CUOMO: “Why did they stop tracking it [breakthrough cases]?”
11 REDFIELD: “I think there was a decision not to do anything that made the vaccine
12 sound like it didn’t work.”
13 Vaccine Mandates, a “Terrible Decision”
14 Dr. Redfield also told Chris Cuomo that vaccine mandates were a “terrible decision.”
15 He says vaccine mandates were “emotional” and not based on science — and that there
16 was no rationale for mandating the shots on healthy, young people.
17 END QUOTE
18
19 Clearly as now admitted “He says vaccine mandates were “emotional” and not based on
20 science” then one has to question on what scientific and medical grounds were the FAKE covid-
21 19 vaccines justified?
22
23 As your client as I understand it was engaged in enforcing these UNCONSTITUTIONAL and
24 non-scientific MANDATES such as for mask, social distancing, purported COVID-19 vaccines
25 then your client can perhaps explain in a court of law why it collaborated, etc, with the
26 UNCONSTITUTIONAL mandates?
27 Let it be very clear that if all councillors had demanded to see legal and scientific evidence as to
28 the validity of MANDATES then hundreds of thousands of victims may never have ended up
29 being victims, let alone the many who died may still be alive.
30
31 https://www.globalresearch.ca/uk-telegraph-reports-skyrocketing-excess-
32 deaths/5859170?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
33 British Media Report Confirms Skyrocketing Excess Deaths in All Highly COVID-19
34 Vaccinated Countries
35

36
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 21 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 22

1 Yes, in 2020 less people died then 2019 and so also in 2021, 2022 and 2023 but yet we had then
2 Premier Daniel Andrews in 2020 claiming day after day how many people had died, while
3 concealing that less people died in the overall.
4
5 My son Mark (41) was about 2 months ago given a life expectancy of 2 months to 2 years to live
6 as he had 2 Pfizer jabs forced upon him to keep his job only then for Holden thereafter
7 downsizing and he lost his job anyhow. And well my extensive writings since early 2020 now
8 will be used to show I warned and warned and well all those involved (including councillors) in
9 the “covid scam” should be held legally accountable.
10
11 I have recently published a 3-part Supplement to my original 6 August 2021 COMPLAINT to
12 the Australian Federal Police which includes extensive set out why there never was a covid-19
13 virus! I will provide links below but if the links do not work because Scribd shadow ban
14 documents it doesn’t like (which in itself is unconstitutional) then I can on request email copies.
15
16 Because I raise numerous constitutional issues and considering I defeated the Commonwealth
17 and the 9 Attorney-Generals in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka in both cases, then your client cannot
18 overcome the Res Judicate! It cannot seek to enforce purported state law where the former
19 Victorian Attorney-General made known to accept the court’s decision!
20
21 Mark was on 5 June 2024 admitted (again) to hospital but then discharged himself on 6 June
22 2024 because he didn’t want to mis out on celebrating my birthday. After all he may not life to
23 see another one of my birthdays.
24
25 Your client and other councils by having gone along with the unconstitutional jabbing of
26 Victorians and enforcing the UNCONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES by this prevented me to
27 attend to the Berriwillock property such as to continue the renovations, etc. It neither did bother
28 to organise with me (as Wycheproof Shire Council used to do) as to arrange for your client at its
29 own cost to slash the growth resulting from the undesired and unlawful contamination of my
30 FEE SIMPLE property.
31 As result also, I discovered that many thousands of tools and equipment have been stolen from
32 the property.
33
34 The onus is now upon your client to try to compensate for its ongoing problems, as it could
35 have avoided most if not all of it.
36
37 Zinfra issued me with a notice of my 107 Graham Property, Viewbank making known that my
38 property is in a “Low Bushfire Risk Area” and it will clear the branches around the power lines
39 (so far I did it always myself) “Costs These works are carried out free of charge”
40
41 A few years ago, in Queensland, a dam was releasing water causing considerable damages to
42 property owners and the State government was required to provide compensation.
43
44 Buloke Shire Council” claiming to be a “Law Enforcement Agency” and yet enforcing unlawful
45 MANDATES and disregarding to enforce the “Safe Drinkwater Act” and failing to prevent the
46 contamination of my property with unwanted grain, etc, then must be held legally accountable.
47
48 In the process of the unconstitutional MANDATES my property was robbed and now your
49 client can make proposals how it desires to my satisfaction address the various issues.
50

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 22 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 23

1 I cannot continue to rely upon others, let alone incur huge cost and Buloke Shire Council then
2 still seeking to litigate and so it now can submit to me what it proposes do to clear my property
3 of the unwanted grain/wheat growth, etc and seek to prevent any further contamination, at its
4 cost!
5 Also, what it now proposes to do at its cost about renovating my property considering my tools
6 and equipment, etc, has been robbed
7
8 What your client proposes to do to investigate the harm it may have inflicted upon the residents
9 within the Shire of Buloke by its enforcement of unconstitutional MANDATES demands, and
10 how to compensate any and/or all victims.
11
12 As I understand it, many businesses went broke/bankrupt and marriages failed, etc, and
13 schoolchildren denied proper education where as I view councillors really cared for residents,
14 they as I did could have done their research and prevent if not all at least most harm.
15
16 There can be no excuse to claim “following orders” because following unconstitutional/unethical
17 directions from unqualified persons never can be an excuse.
18
19 When someone desires to be a councillor then the person better understand that there are
20 obligations and liabilities and ignoring resident’s constitutional, legal, human, natural and
21 common law rights will not be accepted.
22
23 Obviously, Banyule City council is also in part to blame as its conduct to vandalise my wife’s
24 lawfully parked motor vehicle and so preventing me to have the use of the motor vehicle to
25 travel with a trailer to Berriwillock to continue renovations, as well as to cause physical harm on
26 29 November 2024 by their trespassing, etc, that my wife now relies upon a wheelchair is what
27 cannot be ignored.
28 As I indicated Buloke Shire Council charged me $400 for NOT collecting garbage and NOT
29 having the local tip open. For seeking to extort from me alleged “council rates” that are
30 unconstitutional. And, then engage a debt collector to pursue to extort from me monies by threats
31 of litigation!
32
33 I do not fear litigation as I spend a considerable time over about 5 decades assisting/representing
34 parties and always FREE OF CHARGE because my issue was to persist in people obtaining
35 JUSTICE.
36 I had this man who contemplated suicide and he was then advised to contact me. He did. His
37 issue was that he had orders against him without ever having been given a chance to place his
38 case before the court. I indicated that a judge may have to make a decision upon the evidence
39 before him and one could lose a case not because there was no evidence but because the judge
40 may have to consider which party presents the best case, etc. Anyhow, I assisted him in getting a
41 hearing and after the judge ruled against him, we left the court. He thanked me for my assistance
42 and made clear he was very pleased with the judge. As the judge explained he had listened to
43 both parties and in the end had to make a decision which party he held was presenting the best
44 case and therefore decided as he did. This is what this man held he finally had an honest judge
45 who actually listened to him and showed to have considered what he presented and that to him
46 was he had obtained JUSTICE even so he still had lost the case.
47
48 Regretfully, besides the courts numerous persons made known that when they approached
49 councillors, they say something but really did nothing. It is a modus operandi with councillors,
50 lawyers, judges, etc. Just check how many times Buloke Shire Councillors responded to my
51 objections to the unconstitutional “council rates”. They never at least to my knowledge did! And
52 this again is the general modus operandi with councillors.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 23 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 24

1 They were enforcing the unconstitutional MANDATES and in the process cause elaborate harm
2 and victims even dying or get injured for life. In my view they could have prevented if not all at
3 least most.
4 How many times did a councillor complain to the state government that the childhood
5 vaccinations should be investigated if they are actually properly tested? I doubt any did. Yet,
6 when it comes to measles, polio, etc, they are “man-kind” diseases that in my view are within
7 the exclusive legislative powers of the Commonwealth since 1908!
8 Well now having 3 of my grandchildren ending up with AUTISM and having obtained details
9 that the (USA) CDC all along was aware but did hide that vaccinations caused AUTISM, then
10 obviously the issue is if I can do my own research and discover this all, then why can all those
11 councillors around Australia and in particular Victoria not likewise have done the same?
12 Is it that councillors want the power to dictate but not the responsibilities for their actions?
13 Is it that councillors take the position they can blatantly disregard the rights of residents and even
14 if they are doing it all wrong/unlawful, etc, in the end no one will sue them as the property
15 owners will pay any compensation bill?
16 She was denied proper face to face medical care at Austin Hospital all because of the rubbish
17 mask, and jabs that we had to incur many thousands of dollars for private care. I did make clear
18 to Austin some years ago I would hold them legally accountable. After all, I have the unique
19 position to have the knowledge about constitutional issues relevant to it all as well as that the
20 entire “covid scam” was a fraudulent advance planned deception!
21 And your client can do its own research to trye to prove that there was ever a actual Koch
22 postulate isolation and purification of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 (covid-19) virus, when already
23 the German court ruled it didn’t exist, as I in the past published!
24
25 Well, one may notice that when I write I generally include councillors email addresses in the
26 headings of my writings, so no one of them can claim they never were given an opportunity to be
27 aware of what I conveyed to them. Albeit, it is not my job to educate councillors as to their
28 moral, ethic and/or legal responsibilities! They may ignore my writings or even go on the
29 internet attacking my credibility but then they also have to accept the legal consequences that
30 they can be personally sued.
31
32 Your client may have to make a choice to litigate in the High Court of Australia about
33 constitutional issues, and knowing that I defeated the lot in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka or it seeks to
34 make proposals how to seek to resolve to my satisfaction matters in dispute.
35
36 Let us not ignore that councils claim to be “Law Enforcement Agencies” while in fact using staff
37 to terrorise businesses that they must have the covid jab or be closed down. Where were the
38 medical qualifications of council staff to dictate a medical treatment? Is that absurd idiotic
39 nonsense used to claim to pursue “Law Enforcement”, when in real terms it is “TERRORISM”?
40
41 https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/journalists/anthony-dowsley/page/27
42 Our Journalists | News Corp Journalist Network | The Advertiser
43 Roberta claims Gobbo told Carl cops were trying to kill him. Gangland widow Roberta Williams
44 claims doublecrossing lawyer Nicola Gobbo told Carl corrupt ...
45
46 I wrote about this way back in 2017 upon my own personal research and referring to the
47 evidence on possession of the Victorian Police, etc.
48 Then subsequently a former police officer physically commenced to destroy a new fence I was
49 building (with assistance of his employee) and I had a quate of About $10,000 to place a new
50 fence there.
51 As I understand it Nicolo Gobbo became a police informer when she was still a law student.
52 Carl Williams actually wrote about his suspicion she was a police informant.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 24 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 25

1
2 I am not against lawyers, as when it came to lawyer Serena Teffaha I wrote the following article:
3
4 This submission I view addresses that the VLSC cannot in violation of the rule of law
5 claim to enforce it. Neither should any legal practitioner risk to be “cancelled” for
6 daring to speak out in favour of a clients case.
7 This document can be downloaded from:
8 https://www.scribd.com/document/503960157/20210421-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
9 B-to-Associate-of-His-Honour-Forbes-J
10
11 It was one of her earlier writings that she referred to the Biosecurity Act 2015 that alerted me to
12 certain critical issues.
13
14 In my view, she should be reinstated and with compensation, as a lawyer like Serena is
15 what is needed in the legal profession.
16 Regretfully, we had judges who went along with the “covid scam” despite that there never
17 was then or even now that this alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus actually existed.
18
19 Hansard 1-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
20 Australasian Convention),
21 QUOTE Mr. OCONNER (New South Wales).-
22 Because, as has been said before, it is [start page 357] necessary not only that the
23 administration of justice should be pure and above suspicion, but that it should be
24 beyond the possibility of suspicion;
25 END QUOTE
26
27 In my view Lawyer Serena Teffaha was all along correct and it was her exposure to reveal this
28 what appears to have been to debar her from practicing law.
29 There are/were many lawyers who I view deserve credit for seeking to expose the rot but
30 regretfully far too often they are then denied to practice law.
31
32 We have many Members of Parliament who likewise are pursuing justice and then often
33 ridiculed by those in power. Yet, time and time again it turns out that those Members of
34 parliament who were right after all never even got an apology and the Members of Parliament
35 that ridiculed them and actually were so to say the death merchants, they somehow so far never
36 were held legally accountable.
37
38 My past writings since early 2020 and so published was setting out that the so called “covid-19
39 vaccine” never was a vaccine at all!
40
41 QUOTE 20210206-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE -Genocidal fake vaccinations
42 https://www.theepochtimes.com/four-deaths-in-elderly-reported-from-3-countries-during-
43 first-days-of-vaccine-rollout-authorities-urge-calm_3639786.html
44 Four Deaths in Elderly Reported From 3 Countries During First Days of Vaccine
45 Rollout, Authorities Urge Calm
46
47 https://www.theepochtimes.com/hundreds-sent-to-emergency-room-after-getting-covid-19-
48 vaccines_3644148.html
49 Hundreds Sent to Emergency Room After Getting COVID-19 Vaccines
50 QUOTE
51 Over 1,000 people injected with a new COVID-19 vaccine have experienced an adverse event, with
52 hundreds being taken to emergency rooms.

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 25 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 26

1 One patient in Michigan on Dec. 16, 2020, became lightheaded and dizzy, and experienced chest tightness
2 and hand tingling. She repeatedly told doctors, “I think I am having a panic attack.” She was sent to the
3 emergency room for evaluation.
4 That’s one of 308 reports from patients sent to hospital emergency rooms documented on
5 the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). That represents 0.0064 percent of the total
6 vaccinations done, 4.8 million, as of Jan. 5.
7 In other cases, patients experienced nausea, tremors, stabbing pain, and wheezing.
8 In one report, a 33-year-old male in Georgia reported receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine on Dec. 17,
9 2020.
10 “I initially had to sit down for about 15 min and felt my mouth dry, my tongue was kind of tingling, not
11 swollen. I was checked for anaphylactic shock. I felt like an adrenaline shock, and felt my heart racing, my
12 [blood pressure] was high—stayed in the ER for an hour for observation. I felt the same kind of sensation
13 when I had COVID in July. This morning, had chills early in the morning around 1 a.m. but it is all gone
14 now,” he wrote.
15 VAERS was established in 1990 to serve as an early warning system to detect possible safety problems in
16 U.S.-licensed vaccines. It’s managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S.
17 Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Anyone can report an adverse event to the system.
18 “VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem, but is especially useful for
19 detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse event reporting that might indicate a possible safety
20 problem with a vaccine. This way, VAERS can provide CDC and FDA with valuable information that
21 additional work and evaluation is necessary to further assess a possible safety concern,” the system’s website
22 states.
23 Issues with the newly approved COVID-19 vaccines began almost immediately after they started being
24 administered. A healthcare worker at Bartlett Regional Hospital in Alaska suffered a suspected severe
25 allergic reaction, or anaphylaxis, after receiving Pfizer’s vaccine. She was taken to the emergency room and
26 spent several nights there before being discharged.
27 Thousands of people self-reported being unable to work or perform daily activities, or required care from a
28 health care professional, after getting one of the doses from the first tranche.
29 The FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System hasn’t been updated to include data for the last quarter of 2020
30 yet.
31 END QUOTE
32
33 Dr Sherri Tenpenny refers to the website clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ regarding the details, as
34 such they are government issued details.
35 Dr Sherri Tenpenny on Twitter
36 https://mobile.twitter.com/BusyDrT/status/1356973785698729987/photo/1
37 QUOTE
38 The Estimated Study Completion Date is 31 January, 2023 for Pfizer
39
40 The Estimated Study Completion Date is October 27, 2022 for Moderna
41 END QUOTE
42
43 Considering that the so called “vaccinations” are “emergency” vaccinations that need final
44 approval once the test are concluded I view that the Government is recklessly playing with the
45 lives of the many, in particular the elderly. It just doesn’t make sense to have the elderly
46 injected with stuff that likely will kill them unless this is a deliberate genocide.
47
48 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_kJtCIVOfM
49 China Fake Corona Vaccine
50 This video warns about FAKE vaccines
51
52 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUkTmgfYWe8
53 Fake Covid-19 Vaccines: What to Know About Counterfeit Shots Sold Online WSJ
54 This video is a warning that there are websites selling FAKE vaccines, which can in fact be
55 deadly pending what is in it.
56
57 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URyYpR1KMQU
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 26 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 27

1 Australia secures 10 million more Pfizer doses SBS News

2 Allegedly the Australian government has purchased some 100 million vaccines.
3
4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJimpdnLYIA
5 Coronavirus Vaccine: “In Case Of Adverse Events…” What Covaxin Consent Form Says
6 With this vaccination one must first sign a consent form as to that one cannot sue if there are
7 complications.
8 .
9 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izogAfsV9R8
10 Covid Stats Show a Trend From Vaccinations: Johns Hopkins
11 This appears to indicate that the overall estimated losses to the US economy is nearly the entire
12 national income. One may ask why is the Covid-19 death toll so much hyphened up when the
13 total yearly death toll after all appears to be about the same as the previous year?
14
15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hklx8Qxf5aY
16 Will the vaccine work against coronavirus mutations?
17 If the gene therapy is to a certain virus then any mutation may not work. Is that meaning that a
18 person will have numerous gene therapies and ends up with numerous changes to the DNA?
19
20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7hj0UjU0wM
21 Alarmist coronavirus claims have been ‘consistently wrong’
22 We had all kinds of alarmist such as Neil Ferguson making absurd claims, as he did with the so
23 called Global Warming when in the end it never resulted. There have been numerous claims
24 about hospitals having been overwhelmed when people went down to those hospitals and finding
25 that the hospitals are nearly empty. As such there is an elaborate con job going on.
26
27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=the81FQoAUI
28 What the COVID Vaccine Does To Your Body
29 Whenever a person has some vaccination and/or gene therapy then this likely will permanently
30 affect the body, and well some permanent changes are of short duration when the person dies as
31 result of the vaccination.
32
33 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moE-XtI60uo
34 Can COVID-19 Vaccine Cause Infertillity ObGyn doctor Answers
35 This video to me is questionable in that this Doctor supposed to be an expert actually seems to be
36 unaware that I various courts already held that vaccinations caused sterilization, such as in one
37 court case about million women. Hardly just a few women. Claiming that there is “no scientific
38 evidence” may underline how absurd this claim was.
39 END QUOTE 20210206-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE -Genocidal fake
40 vaccinations
41
42 As my published writings exposes there was ample of warnings about the dangers of this FAKE
43 covid-19 so called vaccine and yet it was ignored all around.
44
45 QUOTE 20210331-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to PM Mr SCOTT MORRISON & Ors-Re FOI,
46 CORONAVIRUS, DNA, etc-Suppl 4-test-03-06
47 DID YOU CATCH COVID-19 AFTER GETTING THE VACCINE?
48 The HighWire with Del Bigtree
49 DID YOU CATCH COVID-19 AFTER GETTING THE VACCINE?
50 More than two months into the vaccine rollout and the Covid vaccine still has not proven to
51 stop infection or transmission of SARS-CoV2, which could explain what mainstream media is
52 calling “breakthrough cases,” a phenomenon where people are testing positive for #Covid19
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 27 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 28

1 within a few days or weeks after getting the Covid vaccine.

2 #BreakthroughCases #VaccineEfficacy #MSM #Pfizer #Moderna #TheHighwire #DelBigtree
3
4 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-19-vaccine-
5 news/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=cc4fbf8a-fef7-446e-b013-777366a5330a
6 Concord Cancels School Due to Bad Reactions to COVID Vaccine + More • Children's Health Defense
7 10/30/20
8 BIG PHARMA › NEWS
9 Concord Cancels School Due to Bad Reactions to COVID Vaccine + More
10 QUOTE
11 chris • (https://disqus.com/by/disqus_ h54AAYB0VI/)
12 Not sure what to take seriously, if anything.. Pfizer CEO won't take his product? Trump
13 and his staff won't take it (CNN), but then: “The FDA’s decision followed an extraordinary
14 sequence of events on Friday morning when the White House chief of staff, Mark
15 Meadows, told the FDA commissioner, Dr. Stephen Hahn, to consider looking for his next
16 job if he didn’t get the emergency approval done on Friday????????
17 And nurses are already injected with the genetically modifying concoction??
18 It seems like one is in a nightmare dream for long time already...
19 Taking the newest Pfizer publication on their BNT162b2 trial results in the vaccinated
20 group of ~20000, TWO people died. If condition for any of these trials was to be perfectly
21 healthy, that would imply Pfizer's genetically modifying slurry causes a death rate of
22 0.01%. And now this concoction suppose to be for covid-19 with the newest data on its
23 death rates of 0.05% among the SICK ONES, and now a vaccine which caused 0.01%
24 DEATH RATES AMONG ALL THE HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS? That's not even idiocy, that's
25 100% proof that genetically modifying all humans is the number ONE priority of the
26 satanic cult. People are not being told that:
27 1. the injection will cause an expression of the anti-VMAT-2 protein(wiping out
28 human believe), which is partly IMBEDDED into the C-terminl portion of the RNA
29 code of the SPIKE in that concoction
30 2. that there are countless tiny pieces of anthrax, botulin, ricin, tetanus toxins in
31 that modified mRNA slurry
32 3. that there are pieces of HIV proteins, which is making participants starting to
33 test positive for HIV!
34 4. that there are fragments of FSHR, HCG and others fertility modifying proteins equally
35 included in that 'vaccine'
36 5. that there are EMF responding elements in the viral code
37 6. that if papers about viral shedding of vaccinated are right, then we got a HUGE
38 PROBLEM, since THOSE WHO ALLOW TO BECOME DAMAGED FOR GOOD with those
39 products, WHILE NOT BEING INFORMED PROPERLY, ARE A DANGER TO EVERYONE
40 ELSE AROUND..

41 For anyone who doesn't read Technocracy News, PLEASE read todays article:
42 "COVID mRNA Vaccines Kick Off Planetary Genetic Overwrite"
43 I'd add only the following, about the nanoparticles coming together with the
44 modified mRNA, since one can't even find the details on those special ingredients.
45 Here some pieces from AMerican Laboratory News Feb 1999, ~20 years ago(!!!):
46 " Modern biopharmaceuticals in development are principally comprised of

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 28 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 29

1 monoclonal antibodies, gene therapy agents and variety of other large protein-
2 based materials*. Many of these products will be formulated either as direct
3 preparations or in a liposomal or nanoparticle delivery vehicle (->covid vaccine is
4 both liposomal nano). These nanoparticles are DESIGNED to allow the active drug
5 (new SYNTHETIC GENES) to be effectively carried within the body and TARGET the
6 diseased cell type or area (whole body with covid jab).
7 Specific size and surface characteristics of these new nanoparticle formulations
8 DIRECTLY EFFECT THE TARGETING of the drug as well as RATES at which the active
9 drug is dosed to the disease site.
10 Understanding these insights is FUNDAMENTAL in the research, development and
11 process control of todays new drug delivery systems..."
12 *Biotechnology Medicines in Development 1996.
13 => That's why so intense monitoring of every recipient with the new genetically
14 modifying jab, that's why all the G's (in particular 5G with different spacial energy
15 distribution than the previous 1,2,3,4G, absorbed by every single nanoparticle) which can
16 drive those nanoparticles anywhere in the body, that's why Zuckerbergs Biohub
17 analysing still human genetic material of every positive PCR in CA, only in order to
18 prepare for monitoring the coming genetic changes, that's why disruption of normal
19 communication, exchange, real information in order to perform undisturbed the
20 SATANIC PLAN TO WIPE OUT HUMAN GENETIC FOOTPRINT.
21 END QUOTE
22 END QUOTE 20210331-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to PM Mr SCOTT MORRISON & Ors-Re FOI,
23 CORONAVIRUS, DNA, etc-Suppl 4-test-03-06
24
25 As shown above I wrote to then Prime Minister Scott Morrison also (repeatedly) but it was all
26 ignored. After all, as now with the DIGITAL ID issues they are in powers and rightly or
27 wrongly will exercise their power to gain more power. In that regard it makes not one of iota
28 difference as to what political party a Member of Parliament belongs when in power, as it is all
29 about their exercise of powers and how they can ensure to be re-elected and gain revolving door
30 appointments, never mind the streets littered with their victims.
31
32 I, as a Dutchman, travelled as a 17-year-old (later 18-year-old) in Noord Braband and well
33 my motorbike had a problem. I attended to a repair business and the owner explained it
34 was Sunday and he doesn’t work then but I was at liberty to use his workshop to repair my
35 motor bike. I did repair my motor bike and then thanked the man for his kindness. He
36 refused any payment. I then travelled through part of Belgium and then into Germany.
37 Near Koblenz my motor bike again broke down and well I knocked on a little house and an
38 old lady indicated I had to wait for her family to come home. I did, not speaking any
39 German but understanding what she was indicating. Then a couple with their child arrived
40 home and I in Dutch explained my problems. They offered me a bed. I then was working
41 on their field pulling a plough with the man behind it. I subsequently was able to score a
42 job in a toolroom and after 3 months moved nearby my work, but the couple refused any
43 payments. I then rented a room with a family who had 2 sons my age. I lived there for a
44 number of months before renting a bungalow opposite where I was working. I did have a
45 girlfriend and her father was a civil engineer who one day asked us to join him in his study.
46 He explained that he and the family were going to move to another country and well he
47 was going to offer us a deal but subject to a test, that if I was to pass the test then he would
48 give the house as a wedding presence. To Anne Marie and myself. I didn’t know what test
49 he had in mind but I accepted. He then explained we (that is him and I) would go to a pub
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 29 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 30

1 and then see who would outlast in drinking and stay sober. Anne Marie indicated to me
2 that I could never succeed because her father always drinks a lot of beer whereas she knew
3 I maximum would one glass in an entire day. I nevertheless accepted the challenge. So, the
4 father and I went to the pub and he ordered 2 beers. I sipped at the huge glass of beer and
5 then asked him if he could tell me about his growing up and about how he became a civil
6 engineer, etc. And well he started as when he was a child and when he finished his first
7 drink he encouraged me to drink my beer but I explained that I wanted to understand what
8 he was saying about his life and so I better take it easy. He ordered 2 beers and when he
9 finished his second, I suggested he takes my second beer before it f-goes off as I still had
10 my first beer. He accepted and each time he ordered new beers the same switching of
11 empty for full beer glasses. The table was filling with empty glasses and I was still on my
12 first beer. By the time the pub closed I was still on my first beer glass whereas the father
13 was unstable standing up. The next day the father called us again into his study and made
14 known I had passed the test as I had been very honest to getting him to drink my beer time
15 and time again but that proved I was very smart rather then stupid to try to outdrink him, as
16 he knew I never would have stood a change to defeat him in drinking the volume of beer
17 he is used to. So, he announced his blessing for the marriage and he would give us the
18 house as a wedding present. Here I was renting a bungalow and my possession was a
19 motor bike and some clothing and suddenly I was offered ownership (with Anna Marie) of
20 a house without any financial debts. A double story large mansion! The father then made
21 known he was going to leave Anna Marie and myself alone to work out wedding plans.
22 When Anne Marie and I were along I explained that I did love her very much but there
23 would be no wedding as I was to leave and never come back. I then left! I decided not to
24 tell her my real reasons. Our relationship had always been platonic, and as such she was so
25 to say not damaged goods.
26 Reality was that her father when talking at the pub had also made known what he did
27 during the second world war and how he killed people, and somehow was proud on what
28 he did then. I had as I understand it some 96 persons of my Jewish family ending up death
29 in concentration camps and there was no way I could ever have him as my father-in-law,
30 and not wanting to hurt Anna Marie’s feelings I held it better not to reveal this to her, so I
31 would not cause either a possible division between her and her father.
32
33 Even more than half a century later I often wonder what may have happened to Anne
34 Marie, as she was really a beautiful, person but no matter he offered this mansion of a
35 house, as a wedding present to me this had no value when it came to my views that if Anne
36 Marie and I were to have children they may inherit his kind of character.
37
38 And my rejection of property was because I held, I was not for sale, has been with me ever since.
39 Hence, I would assist people, even at times borrowing monies to assist/represent others in their
40 litigation, etc. I can understand that a legal practitioner may need to charge for services rendered
41 to clients, but I am too well aware that many lawyers are crooks and swindle their clients. This
42 also may underline why I so much respected lawyer Serena Teffaha, because in my view she
43 was the right kind of lawyer, who placed herself at risk for exposing the truth.
44 How on earth can anyone respect the judges when they are concealing that the state government
45 was involved in the set up of murdering Carl Williams as I already exposed in 2017?
46 When Daniel Andrews and his wife Catharine had this accident with the pushbike driver, I
47 suspected that Daniel Andrews more than likely was the driver but Catharine too the fall to
48 protect him. The fact that as I view it he lied in his statement to the police and other conduct very
49 much seemed to me to pin point he was the driver but for the sake of protecting his future
50 Catherine took the fall. I had the same perception when he claimed to have fallen as somehow
51 what he stated didn’t seem to me to be correct. And I suspect he would do the same about the
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 30 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 31

1 MANDATES, etc, as after all he deceived Victorians from onset to go on and on about people
2 dying concealing the death toll was actually lower.

3
4

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 31 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 32

1 This is from my wife as she realises, she is near the end of her life and likely never may enjoy
2 the peace and tranquillity of life at Berriwillock, as the property renovations not only was
3 hampered but with the tools and equipment stolen makes it even more difficult to get it all done
4 in the limited time she has left. Also, due to her health issues was unable to go anywhere to
5 celebrate my birthday.
6
7 The same with my son Mark, he has many fond memories about the time at Berriwillock, but
8 now too may be denied to enjoy life at Berriwillock, due to the time limit he has been given by
9 his doctors, as result of the Pfizer jabs and the subsequent health problems.
10
11 And any councillor who thinks to do a great job as a councillor I would make it very clear look
12 in the mirror and see who you are really.
13
14 The federal government is all about mis/disinformation when in real terms it was and still is the
15 greatest offender. I happen to read an article:
16
17 https://www.9news.com.au/world/donald-trumps-attacks-on-us-justice-system-after-guilty-verdict-could-be-useful-
18 to-autocrats-like-putin/f58b4656-64ec-447b-a951-047108f72113?dicbo=v2-
19 ljQomTb&utm_campaign=outbrain&utm_source=nine.com.au&utm_medium=partner
20 Trump's attacks on US justice system after guilty verdict could be useful to autocrats like
21 Putin
22 QUOTE
23 After his historic guilty verdict in his hush money case, Donald Trump has attacked
24 the US criminal justice system, making unfounded claims of a “rigged” trial that
25 echoed remarks from the Kremlin.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 TO ME THIS WAS UTTER AND SHEER RUBBISH.
29
30 https://www.westernjournal.com/trump-defense-team-notified-comment-found-new-york-court-page-predicting-
31 outcome-trial/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTBreaking&utm_campaign=wj-
32 breaking&utm_content=conservative-tribune
33 Trump Defense Team Notified of Comment Found on New York Court Page Predicting
34 Outcome of Trial
35 QUOTE
36 “Today, the Court became aware of a comment that was posted on the Unified Court
37 System’s public Facebook page and which I now bring to your attention,” Merchan wrote.
38 The judge stated that a Facebook user named Michael Anderson commented, “My cousin
39 is a juror and said Trump is getting convicted.”
40 Anderson concluded, “Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!”
41 The comment was accompanied by both a party emoji and a heart emoji.
42 Merchan reported that the comment was posted on May 29 – which was a day before a jury
43 of 12 New Yorkers convicted Trump on May 30.
44 According to NBC News, the comment that warranted a letter to Trump’s legal team is
45 now deleted, and the network had not independently confirmed its existence.
46 The news led to quick calls for the conviction to be vacated:
47 It was not immediately clear whether the person who posted it had really been linked to a
48 juror.
49 END QUOTE
50
51 As I understand it President Donald J Trump was charged with misdemeanours that had a life
52 expectancy of 2 years (statute of limitations), even so more than 6 years had already passed,
53 however, were allegedly validated by non-existing other charges.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 32 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 33

1 Again:
2 QUOTE
3 After his historic guilty verdict in his hush money case, Donald Trump has attacked
4 the US criminal justice system, making unfounded claims of a “rigged” trial that
5 echoed remarks from the Kremlin.
6 END QUOTE
7
8 “making unfounded claims of a “rigged” trial” & “that echoed remarks from the
9 Kremlin.”.
10
11 And here we are again the media in my view making deceptive claims as I view it was doing
12 regarding the “covid scam” and they obviously have learned nothing as to legal accountability
13 unless they are held “legally accountable”.
14
15 Did anyone bother to check if the huge payout of millions of dollars to the media was actually
16 constitutional permissible. I do not think so, as I have set out in my past published writings.
17
18 It is therefore time not to just politicians, lawyers, judges, councillors, etc, legally accountable
19 but also go after the media.
20
21 My wife even this today stated she may only have days to live, and not even Banyule City
22 Council bothered to apologize for the harm they inflicted upon her such as on 29 November
23 2023, and well they will discover that they will be held legally accountable!
24 Let every one who were harmed as result of this elaborate “covid scam” now also go ahead and
25 hold all the evil doers legally accountable, including the lawyers who are seeking to cover up for
26 the evil doers!
27
28 Let it be very clear that matters that remain unresolved to my satisfaction then more than
29 likely will only escalate, and as such any delay should be sought to be avoided.
30 END QUOTE 20240608-MrG. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to ESa lawyers
31
32 Banyule City Council chose its own lawyers and regardless if they are competent or incompetent
33 in the end Banyule City Council has to cop the consequences having disregard our legal rights.
34 ND QUOTE 20240608-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Banyule City Council, Cr Mayor Tom Melican
35 and Ors
36
37 We have a system that one has to be a qualified
38 medical doctor to be able to prescribe medical
39 treatment for a (human) patient.
40
41 The head of the United Nations (UN) is not a qualified medical doctor!
42 The head of the World Health Organisation (WHO) is a veterinarian, not a qualified
43 medical doctor!a
44 The head of World Economic Forum (W.E.F.) is not a qualified medical doctor.
45 The Federal Minister for heals was Greg Hunt not being a qualified medical doctor!
46 The Prime minister is not a qualified medical doctor.
47 The TGA John Skerrit neither was a qualified medical doctor.
48 The Premier of Victorian then being Daniel Andrews was not a qualified medical doctor.
49 The Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton was not a qualified medical doctor.
50 The various Victorian Ministers for Health were not qualified medical doctors.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 33 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 34

1
2 My son Mark (41) was employed as a qualified motor vehicle mechanic by PAC Group and then
3 place with Holden.
4
5 Holden made clear that Mark needed to have the jabs or lose employment. Mark waited to the
6 last day, he didn’t want to have the jab but then had to have it. Then the following month he had
7 to have the second jab, or lose employment, so he did have that also. Thereafter Holden
8 downsized and Mark lost his job anyhow. He was unable to pay rent for the room and ended up
9 homeless, and worse now may lose his life as I understand it due to a Turbo Cancer as result of
10 the jabs!
11
12 Obviously, one has to question on what legal basis could
13 Holden insist Mark to inflict self-harm?
14
15 On what legal basis could Holden have as I understand it
16 a person not medically qualified to dictate Mark he must
17 have medical treatments having the jabs?
18
19 On what legal basis could Mark be deemed to have given
20 “informed consent” when it was all pushed as being a
21 “vaccine” whereas it never was a “vaccine” but a “gene
22 therapy” DEPOPULATION “bio weapon”?
23
24

25
26
There never was a covid-19 pandemic!
27

28 There never was a SARS-CoV-2 virus!

29
30
31 We must not ignore either the following:
32
33
34
35
36 TREASON
37
38 TERRORISM
39
40 FRAUD
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 34 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 35

1
2 In My view TREASON constitute as an example where a person betrays the true meaning and
3 application of the legal principles embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
4 Act 1900 (UK).
5
6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason
7 QUOTE
8 Treason is the crime of attacking a state authority to which one owes allegiance. This
9 typically includes acts such as participating in a war against one's native country,
10 attempting to overthrow its government, spying on its military, its diplomats, or its secret
11 services for a hostile and foreign power, or attempting to kill its head of state. A person
12 who commits treason is known in law as a traitor.
13 Historically, in common law countries, treason also covered the murder of specific social
14 superiors, such as the murder of a husband by his wife or that of a master by his servant.
15 Treason (i.e. disloyalty) against one's monarch was known as high treason and treason
16 against a lesser superior was petty treason. As jurisdictions around the world abolished
17 petty treason, "treason" came to refer to what was historically known as high treason.
18 At times, the term traitor has been used as a political epithet, regardless of any verifiable
19 treasonable action. In a civil war or insurrection, the winners may deem the losers to be
20 traitors. Likewise the term traitor is used in heated political discussion – typically as a slur
21 against political dissidents, or against officials in power who are perceived as failing to act
22 in the best interest of their constituents. In certain cases, as with
23 the Dolchstoßlegende (stab-in-the-back myth), the accusation of treason towards a large
24 group of people can be a unifying political message.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Completed_Inquiries/pjcis/securityleg/repo
28 rt/chapter5
29 Chapter 5 International Terrorism - Parliament of Australia
30 Definition of terrorism in Australian law. 5.5. Terrorism in Commonwealth law is defined as an act or threat
31 that is intended to: advance a political, ...
32 QUOTE

33 Definition of Terrorism
34 International law background
35 5.2
36 Broadly speaking, international counter-terrorism law dates from the 1970s.1 The United
37 Nations General Assembly Ad Hoc Committee on Terrorism was established in 19962, and
38 throughout the 1990s, the UN adopted a number of resolutions and instruments intended to
39 create a more comprehensive set of standards to deal with international terrorism (see
40 below).3 There are thirteen international conventions and protocols that deal with specific
41 terrorist methods and tactics.See Appendix A.
42 5.3
43 Nevertheless, the definition of ‘terrorism’ remains contentious and efforts within the UN to
44 reach agreement on a comprehensive international legal definition have so far been
45 unsuccessful.4 There are, however, a number of definitions of terrorism used in the domestic
46 legal systems of comparable countries, which provide useful points of reference.
47 5.4
48 As noted in Chapter 2, the UNSC has affirmed that measures adopted to combat terrorism must
49 be consistent with existing international law on human rights, refugees and humanitarian
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 35 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 36

1 law.5 It is important, therefore, that the definition of terrorism does not conflict with the law of
2 armed conflict, human rights and refugee law.
3
4 Definition of terrorism in Australian law
5 5.5
6 Terrorism in Commonwealth law is defined as an act or threat that is intended to:
7 • advance a political, ideological or religious cause; and
8 • coerce or intimidate an Australian or foreign government or the public (or section of the
9 public ), including foreign public.
10 • The conduct falls within the definition if it:
11 • causes serious physical harm to a person or serious damage to property;
12 • causes death or endangers a persons life;
13 • creates a serious risk to the health and safety to the public (or section of the public), or
14 • seriously interferes, disrupts or destroys:
15 an electronic information, telecommunications or financial system; or

16 an electronic system used for the delivery of essential government services, used for or
17 by an essential public utility, or transport system.
18 5.6
19 Conduct that constitutes, ‘advocacy’, ‘protest’, ‘dissent’ and ‘industrial action’ are
20 exceptions provided the activity is not intended to:
21 • cause death or endanger the life of a person; or
22 • create a serious risk to health or safety to the public (or section of the public).
23 5.7
24 The Australian definition has been criticised as imprecise, so that it will only acquire meaning
25 through its practical application by prosecutorial authorities. Nevertheless, the Gilbert and
26 Tobin Centre for Public Law argued during the Sheller Inquiry and again before us, that the
27 definition, as amended, is one of the best in the common law world.6 The AGD has argued for
28 its simplification.7
29 END QUOTE
30
31 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud
32 QUOTE
33 In law, fraud is intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain, or to deprive a victim of a legal
34 right. Fraud can violate civil law (e.g., a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud or
35 recover monetary compensation) or criminal law (e.g., a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and
36 imprisoned by governmental authorities), or it…+
37 END QUOTE
38
39 Section 44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) sets out in clear
40 terms what may or may not be done within constitutional context.
41
42 QUOTE
43 44 Disqualification
44 Any person who:
45 (i) is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or
46 adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or
47 entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a
48 foreign power; or
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 36 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 37

1 (ii) is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under

2 sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offence
3 punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State
4 by imprisonment for one year or longer; or
5 (iii) is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent; or
6 (iv) holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension
7 payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the
8 revenues of the Commonwealth; or
9 Chapter I The Parliament
10 Part IV Both Houses of the Parliament
11 Section 45
12 26 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
13 (v) has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement
14 with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than
15 as a member and in common with the other members of an
16 incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five
17 persons;
18 shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a
19 member of the House of Representatives.
20 But subsection (iv) does not apply to the office of any of the
21 Queen’s Ministers of State for the Commonwealth, or of any of the
22 Queen’s Ministers for a State, or to the receipt of pay, half pay, or
23 a pension, by any person as an officer or member of the Queen’s
24 navy or army, or to the receipt of pay as an officer or member of
25 the naval or military forces of the Commonwealth by any person
26 whose services are not wholly employed by the Commonwealth.
27 45 Vacancy on happening of disqualification
28 If a senator or member of the House of Representatives:
29 (i) becomes subject to any of the disabilities mentioned in the
30 last preceding section; or
31 (ii) takes the benefit, whether by assignment, composition, or
32 otherwise, of any law relating to bankrupt or insolvent
33 debtors; or
34 (iii) directly or indirectly takes or agrees to take any fee or
35 honorarium for services rendered to the Commonwealth, or
36 for services rendered in the Parliament to any person or State;
37 his place shall thereupon become vacant.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 Section 45 makes it beyond doubt that the moment any Member of parliament violates any of the
41 Section 44 prohibitions then the seat AUTOMATICALLY becomes vacant.
42
43 I have for years written to politicians that when the Governor-General publish in the Gazette
44 (and not until then) to dissolve the House of Representatives and prorogue the Parliament then
45 the seats become vacant
46
47 I have for years written to politicians that when the Governor-General publish in the Gazette
48 (and not until then) to dissolve by DOUBLE DISSOLUTION both Houses of parliament and
49 prorogue the Parliament then the seats of both Houses become vacant.
50
51 While a minister of the Crown/state may exercise his/her ministerial duties during an election
52 period, the Minister cannot use this as to go on a political campaign for re-election at cost of
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 37 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 38

1 taxpayers. It would simply disqualify the Minister from being a Member of parliament and so in
2 the forthcoming election also.
3
4 When seats become vacant then those who held the seat in the House of Representative &
5 territorial Senate seats no longer are Members of Parliament can cannot go on an election
6 campaign at cost of taxpayers.
7
8 When a Senator has to face an election while still sitting as a Senator to complete the term, he
9 cannot use the election period for political benefits for a re-election.
10
11 When there is a DOUBLE DISSOLUTION then Senators are all no longer Members of
12 Parliament either.
13
14 When a Member of Parliament becomes a “Minister’ then the Member of Parliament no longer
15 can claim any “allowance” as the Framers of the constitution made very clear that the person
16 cannot claim both1
17
18 Also, when a Member of Parliament retires/has the seat vacated then all and any payments, being
19 it “allowance” or otherwise stop. This the Framers of the Constitution made very clear as only
20 one person could receive monies for a particular seat.
21
22 Any Member of Parliament who’s seat has been declared vacant, unless self employed or
23 commences employment otherwise, no longer is a Member of Parliament and is actually
24 “unemployed”.
25
26 Our constitutional system doesn’t allow for electors to vote for who shall or shall not be
27 commissioned to be a Minister of the Crown. Only the governor-General has the authority to
28 determine who shall be the “responsible Minister” subject to Section 64 of the constitution.
29
30 During the AEC v Schorel-Hlavka appeals on 19 July 2006 some of my constitutional based
31 issues were that John Howard was not and so other members of the House of Representatives
32 elected as the writs were issued on 8 October 2001 where as the dated 8 October 2001 Gazette
33 was actually not published until 9 October 2001 and some were not provided to some states at all
34 or on 10 October 2001.
35 I provided extensive FOI Act obtained documentation to prove this all. Hence neither the
36 Commonwealth and/or any of the Attorney-Generals challenged me on this.
37
38 The governor-General is the only person who can authorize for Australian armed forces to go to
39 war against a foreign enemy, by way of publishing in the Gazette a DECLARATION OF WAR
40 naming the specific country or countries! The Minister of Defence then is authorised to deploy
41 Australian armed forces against such enemy force(s). The Framers of the constitution did make
42 clear that when a foreign navy enters Australian waters without consent then they obviously are
43 not coming for brotherly love and one didn’t have to wait until the guns are booming but that
44 such conduct was in itself a DECLARATION OF WAR by enemy forces that would permit the
45 Minister of Defence to deploy Australians forces to repel such attack.
46
47 With Afghanistan there was no imminent attack upon the Commonwealth of Australia!
48
49 With Iraq there was no imminent attack upon the Commonwealth of Australia!
50

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 38 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 39

1 With the dispute between Ukraine and the Russian Federation there was no imminent
2 attack upon the commonwealth of Australia!
3
4 With the Russian Federation entering parts of Ukraine this was within the provisions of
5 Article 51 of the United Nations Charter and as such the Russian Federation was entitled to
6 do so. The United Nations was entitled to then itself become involved and say take over
7 but didn’t do so.
8
9 In each case Australian armed forces has been involved in some manner or another without
10 constitutional validity and as such in my view this constituted TREASON on each occasion! By
11 the relevant Prime Minister, the Minister of Defence and others who participated in this conduct!
12
13 During elections we have that political parties are promoting to vote for who shall be “Prime
14 Minister”, this even so no one can vote for who shall be Prime Minister because it is an exclusive
15 prerogative power of the Governor-General. I did alert the AEC about it but it failed to take
16 appropriate action.
17
18 A “Prime minister’ is a Minister who has only powers as to the relevant portfolios he is
19 appointed for. As such, a Prime Minister cannot interfere with a decision regarding a port folio
20 he is not commissioned for.
21
22 A “Cabinet” is a group of Ministers who sit together and can freely discuss matters about their
23 own knowledge and experiences regarding a port folio and can make recommendations to the
24 person who is the Minister of a particular portfolio but they cannot overrule the “responsible
25 Minister” regarding his portfolio. The purported “national Cabinet” is not a “Cabinet” at all as a
26 Cabinet can only exist where within constitutional structure they represent a particular cabinet
27 subject to what the relevant Parliament may provide for as legislation.
28
29 For example, with the purported covid-19 MANDATES it was a bunch of people sitting together
30 making decisions to which they had no constitutional powers. The States lacked any legislative,
31 executives and/or administrative powers regarding MANDATES in reference to a “man-kind”
32 infectious disease and the Commonwealth by the provisions of the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth)
33 could not delegate the Minister of Health powers to the States.
34 As such, the purported decisions made by the alleged “National Cabinet” (Not being and not to
35 be confused with the Federal Cabinet) were all in violation to our constitutional system also and
36 FRAUD, TREASON as well as TERRORISM.
37
38 We have a constitutional system which the Framers of the constitution carefully crafted that
39 Appropriation Bills and Taxation bills were to be submitted prior to the commencement of the
40 new financial year (which now commences on 1 July of each year) and that there must be a time
41 period left that allows for where the Bill or Bills are rejected after a period of not less than 3
42 months the bill can again be presented to the Parliament. Further, if it fails again then a
43 DOUBLE DISSOLUTION can be called. The period for an election is about 3 months
44 considering the return of the writs, etc. Meaning that Appropriation Bills and Taxation Bills are
45 to be submitted at least 6 months prior to the commencement of the new financial year, not in
46 may leaving no time for the constitutional provided process. Indeed, the Framers of the
47 constitution made it clear to deny the Senate sufficient time would be TERRORISM/TREASON.
48
49 The Framers of the constitution also made very clear that any Appropriation Bill was to be
50 different as to being for the annual expenditure of a Department versus that of special occasions
51 such as a special payout or fire fighting regarding bush fires, etc.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 39 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 40

1 When the 2020 “covid scam” commenced then Scott Morrison PM engaged in contracts with
2 Pharmaceutical companies without any lawful authority! No Appropriation Bills had been passed
3 prior to the financial years of 2019-2020 and as such there was no money in the kitty for this.
4 Besides already years earlier the patent for covid-19 alleged vaccine was already existing and in
5 2017/2018 governments around the world were buying covid-19 PCR test (the once later held to
6 be defective) and as such it shows that this “covid scam” was prepared years in advance.
7
8 The High Court of Australia holds original jurisdiction involving any matter involving the
9 commonwealth or any federal official and yet in violation of this Scott Morrison PM assigned
10 contract and/or authorised them against what I understand was legal advice to allow Pfizer to
11 dictate terms, etc, such as involving a USA court, etc. That to me was not just TREASON but a
12 conspiracy, this as the lawyers involved should never have allowed this to proceed, and so
13 neither the Attorney-General.
14
15 The States (Territories) do not have any legislative powers when it comes to “man-kind”
16 infectious diseases and by the Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) this falls within the exclusive powers
17 of the Commonwealth. This includes any so called “childhood” vaccinations regarding
18 infectious diseases such as Measles, Polio, etc.
19 However, States/Territories continue since 1908 to nevertheless force injections upon children,
20 etc. That to me is not only TREASON but also TERRORISM.
21
22 The High Court of Australia in The Municipal of Sydney v Commonwealth dictated that parties
23 couldn’t rely upon the Hansard Constitutional Convention Debates records. This, even so the
24 Framers of the Constitution made it very clear:
25
26 Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
27 Convention)
28 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
29 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
30 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
31 END QUOTE
32
33 Hansard 19-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
34 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS:
35 This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community ought to be able to
36 understand.
37 END QUOTE
38 .
39 Hansard 21-9-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
40 QUOTE
41 The Right Hon. C.C. KINGSTON (South Australia)[9.21]: I trust the Drafting Committee
42 will not fail to exercise a liberal discretion in striking out words which they do not
43 understand, and that they will put in words which can be understood by persons commonly
44 acquainted with the English language.
45 END QUOTE
46
47 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
48 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
49 We want a people's Constitution, not a lawyers' Constitution.
50 END QUOTE
51
52 While the High Court of Australia about 7 decades later changed its position the reality is that
53 the High Court of Australia never had such judicial powers in the first place!
54
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 40 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 41

1 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

2 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
3 Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that
4 people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to
5 day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance
6 into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it
7 must in its very essence be a free Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary
8 that is secured in the very way in which the freedom of the British Constitution is secured.
9 It is secured by vesting in the people, through their representatives, the power of the purse,
10 and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of securing absolute freedom to
11 a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than that which we
12 contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect the
13 citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of
14 interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily
15 government of the country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom is
16 the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution.
17 There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every one has
18 sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the
19 popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and
20 I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a
21 free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty
22 of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as
23 the agents of the people. We have provided for a Judiciary, which will determine
24 questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions which should
25 be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all
26 courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not
27 provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the
28 will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution
29 shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court
30 appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a
31 perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It
32 is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the
33 Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose
34 of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and
35 the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
36 Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making
37 a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or
38 infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not
39 altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it
40 gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you
41 are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such
42 a tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent,
43 under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the
44 states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided
45 for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 Just that the harm was done, as every Tom, Dick and Harry had been making decisions in
49 violation of what was constitutionally permissible or not.
50
51 As I successfully submitted and so unchallenged by the commonwealth and/or any of the 9
52 Attorney-Generals on 19 July 2006 regarding “Australian Citizenship” not being a “nationality”.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 41 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 42

1
2 Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
3 QUOTE
4 Mr. SYMON.-Very likely not. What I want to know is, if there is anybody who will
5 come under the operation of the law, so as to be a citizen of the Commonwealth, who
6 would not also be entitled to be a citizen of the state? There ought to be no opportunity for
7 such discrimination as would allow a section of a state to remain outside the pale of the
8 Commonwealth, except with regard to legislation as to aliens. Dual citizenship exists, but it
9 is not dual citizenship of persons, it is dual citizenship in each person. There may be two
10 men-Jones and Smith-in one state, both of whom are citizens of the state, but one only
11 is a citizen of the Commonwealth. That would not be the dual citizenship meant.
12 What is meant is a dual citizenship in Mr. Trenwith and myself. That is to say, I am a
13 citizen of the state and I am also a citizen of the Commonwealth; that is the dual
14 citizenship. That does not affect the operation of this clause at all. But if we introduce this
15 clause, it is open to the whole of the powerful criticism of Mr. O'Connor and those who say
16 that it is putting on the face of the Constitution an unnecessary provision, and one which
17 we do not expect will be exercised adversely or improperly, and, therefore, it is much
18 better to be left out. Let us, in dealing with this question, be as careful as we possibly, can
19 that we do not qualify the citizenship of this Commonwealth in any way or exclude
20 anybody [start page 1764] from it, and let us do that with precision and clearness. As a
21 citizen of a state I claim the right to be a citizen of the Commonwealth. I do not want
22 to place in the hands of the Commonwealth Parliament, however much I may be
23 prepared to trust it, the right of depriving me of citizenship. I put this only as an
24 argument, because no one would anticipate such a thing, but the Commonwealth
25 Parliament might say that nobody possessed of less than £1,000 a year should be a citizen
26 of the Federation. You are putting that power in the hands of Parliament.
27 Mr. HIGGINS.-Why not?
28 Mr. SYMON.-I would not put such a power in the hands of any Parliament. We must
29 rest this Constitution on a foundation that we understand, and we mean that every
30 citizen of a state shall be a citizen of the Commonwealth, and that the Commonwealth
31 shall have no right to withdraw, qualify, or restrict those rights of citizenship, except
32 with regard to one particular set of people who are subject to disabilities, as aliens, and so
33 on.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
37 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.
38 If we are going to give the Federal Parliament power to legislate as it pleases with
39 regard to Commonwealth citizenship, not having defined it, we may be enabling the
40 Parliament to pass legislation that would really defeat all the principles inserted
41 elsewhere in the Constitution, and, in fact, to play ducks and drakes with it. That is
42 not what is meant by the term "Trust the Federal Parliament."
43 END QUOTE
44
45 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
46 QUOTE
47 Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by the
48 Parliament of the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in effect, because the
49 provisions of this Constitution, the principles which it embodies, and the details of enactment by which
50 those principles are enforced, will all have been the work of Australians.
51 END QUOTE
52
53 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
54 QUOTE
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 42 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 43

1 Mr. BARTON.- Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have provided for an
2 Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and,
3 therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people.
4 END QUOTE
5 .
6 HANSARD 17-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
7 QUOTE Mr. OCONNOR.-
8 We must remember that in any legislation of the Commonwealth we are dealing with the
9 Constitution. Our own Parliaments do as they think fit almost within any limits. In this
10 case the Constitution will be above Parliament, and Parliament will have to conform
11 to it.
12 END QUOTE
13 .
14 HANSARD 9-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
15 QUOTE
16 Mr. HIGGINS.-No, because the Constitution is not passed by the Parliament.
17 END QUOTE
18 .
19 HANSARD 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
20 QUOTE
21 Mr. GORDON.- The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the Constitution
22 we will have to wipe it out."
23 END QUOTE
24
25 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
26 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
27 No one is more in favour of that than I am. But, at the same time, it is said-"Let the Houses
28 of Parliament act capriciously and variously from day to day-allow this 'tacking' to go on if
29 the Houses choose to agree to it-let the Houses do one thing one day and another the next,
30 and do not bother about altering the Constitution, but trust the Parliament." Of course; but
31 Parliament must only be trusted when it is within the Constitution. The Senate of to-
32 day and the House of Representatives must not be put in a position superior to the
33 Constitution.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 Hansard 21-9-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
37 Australasian Convention)
38 QUOTE
39 The HON. E. BARTON (New South Wales)[8.36]: I am unable to see that it would be a
40 good thing to limit this clause in the way suggested by my hon. friend, Mr. Glynn, who has
41 said that this is a matter that should be left to the federal parliament. This happens to be
42 just one of those matters which are included in the constitution of every one of the
43 colonies. All the colonial constitutions provide for such matters as these, and it is perhaps
44 right that they should provide for them, for even in the first parliament it would be rather a
45 strange thing to find persons who had taken oaths of allegiance to foreign powers, who
46 were undischarged bankrupts or insolvents, or who had been recently attainted of crime, or
47 convicted of felony or infamous crime. Unless you have provisions of this kind, it is quite
48 possible that somebody might take a violent affection for a gaol-bird, and put him into
49 parliament. We do not want that sort of thing. It is one thing not to put limita- [start page
50 1013] tions on the ordinary freedom of the citizens of the commonwealth. It is another
51 thing to provide against the defilement of parliament; and this would be the case as regards
52 the 3rd sub-clause, whilst in the case of the 2nd sub-clause it would be the admission into
53 parliament of persons who had not purged themselves of certain disabilities, while in the
54 case of the first subclause it would be the entry of persons into parliament whose very
55 conditions would suggest that their interests were quite different from those of the citizens
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 43 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 44

1 of the country. Persons who have taken the oath of allegiance to a foreign power are
2 not to be classed in the same category as citizens of the country for the purpose of
3 joining in legislation.
4 An HON. MEMBER: And not to be trusted?
5 The Hon. E. BARTON: Not to be trusted, prima facie!
6 END QUOTE
7
8 Hansard 9-9-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
9 Australasian Convention)
10 QUOTE
11 The Right Hon. G.H. REID: I strongly support the amendment for the reasons which my hon. and learned
12 friend has hinted at. This is an expression which would be more in place in the United States Constitution,
13 where treaties are dealt with by the President and the senate, than in the constitution of a colony within the
14 empire. The treaties made by her Majesty are not binding as laws on the people of the United Kingdom,
15 and there is no penalty for disobeying them. Legislation is sometimes passed to give effect to treaties,
16 but the treaties themselves are not laws, and indeed nations sometimes find them inconvenient, as they
17 neglect them very seriously without involving any important legal consequences. The expression, I think,
18 ought to be omitted. I will deal with the other suggested amendments when the time comes.
19 END QUOTE
20
21 Hansard 9-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
22 Australasian Convention)
23 QUOTE
24 Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-The position of my honorable and learned friend (Mr. [start page 2092] Higgins)
25 may be perfectly correct. It may be that without any special provision the practice of the High Court, when
26 declaring an Act ultra vires, would be that such a declaration applied only to the part which trespassed
27 beyond the limits of the Constitution. If that were so, it would be a general principle applicable to the
28 interpretation of the whole of the Constitution.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
32 Australasian Convention)
33 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS (New South Wales).-
34 It does not require a majority of the states to insist that the constitution shall be obeyed, because a
35 majority of the states cannot by resolution infringe the constitution.
36 END QUOTE
37 .
38 Hansard 23-3-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
39 Australasian Convention)
40 QUOTE Mr. BARTON:
41 I believe that, with certain alterations in the financial provisions, that Bill is a measure under which the
42 colonies could even now safely federate. Not that I say it is the best Bill that could be framed; but I do
43 believe it is a well-devised and well-drawn Constitution, and a Constitution [start page 11] under which a
44 free people-making such amendments from time to time as necessity will require, and the powers
45 given by the Constitution will allow-might live in perfect freedom and with perfect security.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 Hansard 9-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
49 Australasian Convention)
50 QUOTE
51 Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-The position of my honorable and learned friend (Mr. [start page 2092] Higgins)
52 may be perfectly correct. It may be that without any special provision the practice of the High Court, when
53 declaring an Act ultra vires, would be that such a declaration applied only to the part which trespassed
54 beyond the limits of the Constitution. If that were so, it would be a general principle applicable to the
55 interpretation of the whole of the Constitution.
56 END QUOTE
57 .
58 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
59 Australasian Convention)
60 QUOTE

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 44 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 45

1 Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his
2 mind to the subject he will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the
3 states Parliament be taken into court the court is bound to give an interpretation
4 according to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may be a good law passed by
5 "the sovereign will of the people," although that latter phrase is a common one which I do
6 not care much about. The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes
7 on the Constitution we will have to wipe it out." As I have said, the proposal I support
8 retains some remnant of parliamentary sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on
9 either side to attack each other's laws.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 From the above a person who made an oath of alliance to a foreign nation cannot be trusted, but
13 to claim that Barnaby Joyce MP was somehow disqualified because his father had certain rights
14 passed on to him to me was utter and sheer nonsense and violated the intentions of the Framers
15 of the constitution.
16
17 Australians are “subject of the British Crown” and remained to be so. The High Court of
18 Australia cannot abuse judicial powers to by backdoor manner seek to amend the
19 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
20
21 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
22 QUOTE Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-
23 When we consider how vast the importance is that every word of the Constitution should
24 be correct, that every clause should fit into every other clause; when we consider the great
25 amount of time, trouble, and expense it would take to make any alteration, and that, if we
26 have not made our intentions clear, we shall undoubtedly have laid the foundation of
27 lawsuits of a most extensive nature, which will harass the people of United Australia and
28 create dissatisfaction with our work, it must be evident that too much care has not been
29 exercised.
30 END QUOTE
31 .
32 Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
33 QUOTE
34 Mr. OCONNOR (New South Wales).-The honorable and learned member (Mr. Isaacs) is I think correct
35 in the history of this clause that he has given, and this is [start page 672] one of those instances which should
36 make us very careful of following too slavishly the provisions of the United States Constitution, or any other
37 Constitution. No doubt in putting together the draft of this Bill, those who were responsible for doing so used
38 the material they found in every Constitution before it, and probably they felt that they would be incurring a
39 great deal of responsibility in leaving out provisions which might be in the least degree applicable. But it is
40 for us to consider, looking at the history and reasons for these provisions in the Constitution of the United
41 States, whether they are in any way applicable; and I quite agree with my honorable and learned friend (Mr.
42 Carruthers) that we should be very careful of every word that we put in this Constitution, and that we should
43 have no word in it which we do not see some reason for. Because there can be no question that in time to
44 come, when this Constitution has to be interpreted, every word will be weighed and an interpretation given
45 to it; and by the use now of what I may describe as idle words which we have no use for, we may be giving a
46 direction to the Constitution which none of us now contemplate. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to see that
47 there is some reason for every clause and every word that goes into this Constitution.
48 END QUOTE
49
50 Getting back to the “covid scam”. Scott Morrison PM announced compulsory vaccination, as he
51 had pushed with “No jab, No pay” albeit unconstitutionally. The commonwealth has no
52 constitutional powers to force anyone to be injected. What it can do is to petition a Court of
53 competent jurisdiction for it to grant orders that a certain person because of medical grounds be
54 ordered to be vaccinated. However, what we had hear was ,, as I all along over the years was
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 45 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 46

1 exposing on my blog at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati that we were dealing with a

2 murderous poisonous injection to deliberately inflict not just harm but even killing people!
3
4 Western Australian even legislated (albeit unconstitutionally) for Australian troops to be able to
5 inject poison into residents. And the Commonwealth also unconstitutionally legislated that
6 foreign troops could be used and couldn’t be held legally accountable for whatever they did.
7
8 As I extensively exposed at my blog the Framers of the constitution made clear that soldiers
9 were not to be used against citizens unless on request such as domestic disturbances. Where we
10 had however such as the Victorian Police firing rubber bullets notably at the Shrine of
11 Remembrance upon parent holding small children for merely daring to exercise their
12 constitutional rights of “political liberty” and “religious liberty” then this I view was TREASON
13 & TERRORISM not just by the police, but also by the armed forces involved in enforcing
14 MANDATES and the politicians and their officials also involved.
15
16 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
17 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
18 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious
19 liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably
20 aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of
21 peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will
22 embrace and unite.
23 END QUOTE
24 And
25 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
26 QUOTE
27 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to
28 commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to
29 commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can
30 conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the
31 world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to
32 vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This
33 new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 Let us also go to the issue of Sunday 22 may 2022. On Saturday 21 May 2022 there was a
37 federal election, while Scott Morrison PM was caretaking PM and other Ministers were likewise
38 in caretaking mode.
39
40 As both Houses of the Parliament had been prorogued and in fact the House of Representatives
41 was dissolved then there was no “Leader of the Opposition” And in fact Anthony Albanese was
42 neither a Member of Parliament. Meaning that he was just like others an ordinary citizen!
43 Yet, I understand he had been travelling about, during the election period, at taxpayers cost
44 including claiming he just wanted to be Prime Minister, without changing anything (on video).
45 Misleading electors that they somehow could vote for him to be Prime Minister.
46 On Sunday 22 May 2022 allegedly a representative of the Commonwealth of Australia voted for
47 certain changes regarding the WHO. Upon who’s constitutional authority?
48 It is claimed that by convention the Prime minister consults with Leader of the Opposition, but
49 there was no one in this position anyhow. Also, a ‘convention’ cannot override the true meaning
50 and application of the legal principles embedded in the constitution!

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 46 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 47

1 Moreover, a Prime minister not being the Minister for health cannot approve anything regarding
2 the Department of health! And Greg Hunt the then Minister for Health had no constitutional
3 authority to allow a foreign enemy entity to take over our constitutional system.
4
5 The Commonwealth of Australia provides for separate powers of the Commonwealth versus the
6 States. However, the Commonwealth cannot intrude upon state specific powers. While the
7 Commonwealth does have legislative powers as to “man-kind” infectious diseases it doesn’t
8 have legislative powers as to health matters not related to “man-kind” infectious diseases. This
9 means that ordinary issues like a person breaking a leg, having a finger injured, having
10 headaches or stomach upset, etc, all remains exclusively within the demain of the state
11 legislative, executive and administrative powers. Yet, somehow the Federal government has
12 been on the forefront to give the WHO (World Health Organisation) (albeit unconstitutionally)
13 powers to dictate by its Director-General a veterinarian what a medical doctor may or may not
14 do!
15 It should be very clear that the Commonwealth lack any such powers whatsoever, because even
16 the Federal Minister for Health is to be a “responsible Minister” accountable to the Parliament,
17 which the WHO is not. Therefore, this I view is TREASON and TERRORISM!
18
19 The same is with this “DIGITAL ID” where this is to obey what the W.E.F., U.N. and/or WHO
20 dictates. My son Mark, while in severe pain & sedated in a bed in hospital, being transferred to
21 another bed, discovered that nursing staff had omitted to take his backpack along. Well, it was
22 stolen and this included his mobile that had his DIGITAL ID. While he was staying in hospital a
23 person withdrew monies from his bank accounts and also used Uber travelling at his cost. Mark
24 contacted the mobile provider to deactivate his mobile, but this was refused because the person
25 using the stolen mobile used now a new simcard. Here we have this elaborate simcard
26 registration but now not used and the thief can use Mark’s DIGITAL id without anyone
27 investigating this. I did report it to IBAC but it simply didn’t respond. For the record I was
28 granted by Mark with Enduring Power of Attorney and so lawfully entitled to act on his behalf.
29 Mark also reported it to the Commonwealth of Australia Bank who simply didn’t do anything
30 other then making clear they wouldn’t replace the missing monies.
31 Meaning, that the DIGITAL ID system clearly is dangerous as many mobiles do get stolen or
32 lost!
33
34 Then we have this DIGITAL MONEY issue pushed also by the W.E.F and others.
35 As our constitution specifically limits the States to only require payments by gold and silver
36 coins then the Commonwealth and certainly the RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia) can then deny
37 usage of cash. Some banks have commenced to refuse to issue cash, and this to me is
38 unconstitutional. The Commonwealth some decades ago insisted that pensioners and welfare
39 recipients were to have a bank account to have monies deposited, instead of cheque’s.
40 This then defeat also “BAIL-IN” as the Commonwealth doesn’t provide ownership of the
41 amount of monies to the Bank but merely that the bank can hold the value of the monies on
42 behalf of the bank account holder. The Bank is a middle man acting for the commonwealth and
43 the ban account holder. It legally is not entitled to use the monies for ulterior purposes because
44 the monies are a payment to the intended bank account customer for living and other
45 requirements. The bank therefore can neither charge any fees for having to pay out cask to the
46 bank account customer as this would undermine the very intent of the Commonwealth to make
47 specific payments to the intended recipient.
48 The states while not able to force anyone to pay in gold or silver coins may however, as it does,
49 allow a person to electronically make a payment. The State by doing so doesn’t force the person
50 to use digital payments but merely provide the person with an option. Meaning the State doesn’t
51 violate constitutional provisions. It would do so however if the State were to charge the customer
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 47 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 48

1 additional fees for electronic payment, this as disabled people may have a problem to attend to a
2 State payment office and so protected by the Disability Discrimination Act (Cth) entitled to
3 make a payment within their capacity without being charged for this extra.
4
5 Getting back about vaccinations, etc, I have been extensively campaigning about the
6 unconstitutional so called “council rates” and decided after decades making clear my position
7 and councils simply ignoring it I was stopping making such demanded payments. Buloke Shire
8 Council engaged a debt collector for this! I responded it has no legal standing. Banyule City
9 Council commenced its terrorism as set out above and also set out in writings to it (and I
10 included to forward it to each and every councillor) and well their reign or terrorism upon my
11 wife and I have been well recorded.
12
13 At no time did Banyule City Council ever obtain any WARRANT against my wife and I and as
14 such it is not that some court did authorise their kind of terrorism.
15 Olga, my wife is close to death and her heart is pumping merely for 30% and her valves are
16 leaking and she had other comorbidities. Having her lawfully parked motor vehicle vandalized
17 by Banyule City Council employee Angela O’Brien may underline how maliciously Banyule
18 city council operates against a known very sick woman who moved into 107 Graham Road,
19 Viewbank about 50 years ago.
20 My wife’s surname is Hlavka-Schorel and my surname is Schorel-Hlavka and as such there can
21 be no mistaken identity as to the owner of the motor vehicle, besides the name Olga underlines
22 this and prior to the vandalism Banyule City council in communication with us about other
23 unrelated matters were well aware of my wife’s ill health.
24 And Banyule City Council engaged lawyers who then somehow demanded that I could not have
25 my own motor vehicle parked behind locked gates in our driveway!
26
27 I also discovered that the ATO has been stealing monies that belongs to my wife and the ATO
28 also has been pestering me with allegedly fining me for failing to provide tax returns. Well,
29 whenever I write extensively to them, they simply ignore it all.
30
31 This in the overall indicates to me that the Commonwealth, the state of Victoria and Councils
32 have combined their efforts to so to say teach me a lesson for daring to expose their TREASON,
33 TERRORISM, and FRAUD. And in the process target my wife also, even so she had nothing to
34 do with what I exposed.
35
36 Just to give an example about the sheer absurdity that goes on. My son Mark, last year,
37 organized and paid for some 100 mm plastic sewerage tubing for me regarding the renovation of
38 the property (where he used to life) in Buloke Shire, and well Banyule City Council through its
39 lawyers demanded that it be removed, allegedly being a fire danger! Moment, 12 meters of
40 plastic tubing, that is ordinary used in any sewerage system at any property somehow was now
41 deemed a fire danger?
42
43 https://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/
44 Fee Simple. - Constitution Watch
45 12 July 2022 ... What is an Estate in Fee Simple? Commonwealth v New South
46 Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923) 33 CLR 1. (9 August 1923) .
47
48 There is an excellent article at https://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/ which also refers to
49 Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34; 919230 33 CLR 1 (9August 1923)
50 QUOTE

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 48 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 49

1 Fee Simple.
2 Posted onMay 10, 2022AuthorEditor
3 What is an Estate in Fee Simple?
4
5 Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923) 33 CLR 1
6 (9 August 1923)
7 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
8 KNOX C.J., ISAACS, HIGGINS, GAVAN DUFFY AND STARKE JJ.
9 THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PLAINTIFF
10 AGAINST
11 THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND ANOTHER DEFENDANTS
12 1920-1923: SYDNEY, Dec. 1-3, 1920; Mar. 21-29, 1922; Aug. 9, 1923 33 CLR 1
13 Extracts from Commonwealth Law Reports Volume 33 / 33 CLR 1:-
14 (1920) 33 CLR 1 at 42
15 ISAACS J. In Challis's Real Property, 3rd ed., p. 218,
16 it is stated with perfect accuracy:—
17 “In the language of the English law, the word fee signifies an estate of inheritance as distinguished
18 from a less estate; not, as in the language of the feudists, a subject of tenure as distinguished from
19 an allodium.”
20 “Allodium being wholly unknown to English law, the latter distinction would in fact have no
21 meaning.” “A fee simple is the most extensive in quantum, and the most absolute in respect to the
22 rights which it confers, of all estates known to the law.”
23 “It confers, and since the beginning of legal history it always has conferred, the lawful right to
24 exercise over, upon, and in respect to, the land, every act of ownership which can enter into
25 the imagination, including the right to commit unlimited waste; and, for all practical
26 purposes of ownership, it differs from the absolute dominion of a chattel, in nothing except
27 the physical indestructibility of its subject.”
28 “Besides these rights of ownership, a fee simple at the present day confers an absolute right, both of
29 alienation inter vivos and of devise by will.” 2
30 END QUOTE
31
32 Again, vandalising my wife’s motor vehicle and this while there are caravans parked in the
33 streets also underlines the nonsense.
34
35 QUOTE 20210806-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian
36 Federal Police-COMPLAINT
37 Reece Kershaw 6-8-2021
38 Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
39 Forwarded via email
40
41 Cc: [email protected]
42 Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
43 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606
44 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
45
46 [email protected]
47 Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
48 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606
49 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
50
51 Mr Daniel Andrews Premier
52 [email protected]
53
54 Mr Martin Pakula, [email protected], [email protected]
55
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 49 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 50

1 Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police

2
3
4 20210806-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
5 COMPLAINT
6 Sir,
7 I understand from news report that a special AFP team has been appointed regarding online
8 publications relating to the COVID-19 issue. I view therefore that it is within the AFP
9 investigative powers to investigate all relevant issues and not just those which the Government
10 may desire to be investigating to perhaps aids in its overthrow of the Commonwealth of
11 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and so the provisions therein.
12
13 https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-anti-vaxxers-targeted-special-team-detectives-fears-could-target-
14 vaccine-hubs/fad28908-9340-4d0e-80f7-f5e21d61f0e7
15 Coronavirus: Anti vaxxers targeted by special team of detectives amid fears they could target
16 vaccine hubs (9news.com.au)
17 Fears vaccine hubs could be 'targeted' as online chatter spikes
18 QUOTE
19 A special team of AFP detectives has been appointed by the Federal Government to
20 watch the online interactions of the anti-vaccination "movement".
21 END QUOTE
22
23 My concern is also that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting with the States as to
24 succeed in this to install a NEW WORLD ORDER, violating our constitutional rights, by
25 providing funding for the unconstitutional lockdowns or any state/territory.
26 END QUOTE 20210806-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the
27 Australian Federal Police-COMPLAINT
28
29 https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/pfizer-fda-study-confirms-that-75?utm_source=post-
30 email-title&publication_id=1103773&post_id=145480919&utm_campaign=email-post-
31 title&isFreemail=true&r=1a0316&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
32 Pfizer FDA Study Confirms 75% of Boosted Children are COVID-19 Infected
33 Healthy children were not at high risk for COVID-19 infection.
34 This is more incriminating Pfizer data confirming that the
35 COVID-19 mRNA injections cause infection and are NOT
36 vaccines.
37
38 Nearly all of my children were born in Australia and all my grandchildren and great-
39 grandchildren are, and they have a right to know the true history of those who original settled in
40 what is now the Commonwealth of Australia and not being swindled into some fabricated
41 historical claims.
42
43 Pauline Hanson’s One Nation <[email protected]>
44 To:Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
45 Fri, 18 Aug at 4:55 pm
46 QUOTE
47 Dear Gerrit,
48 The Freedom of Speech debate has hit fever pitch this week, as it emerges big tech is
49 censoring legitimate and factually correct ‘No’ campaigners opposing Labor's racist and
50 divisive ‘Voice’.
51 Albo's Admission Fuels Debate 📣
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 50 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 51

1 The Prime Minister has confessed that he hadn't

2 fully read the Uluru Statement before endorsing it.
3 This revelation has sparked debates on misinformation and misrepresentation.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 Here we had a politicians ongoing spewing his mantra on television and wherever and yet really
7 was connoting the electors!
8
9 The Following is very relevant, as I will explain after the article!
10
11 https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/german-government-admits-there-was-no-pandemic/
12
13 GERMAN GOVERNMENT ADMITS THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC

14
15 QUOTE
16
17
18 QUOTE 20230728-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 101F-
19 DEMOCIDE 2.0
20 1974/12/10 – Secretary of State Henry Kissenger’s national
21 Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) study
22 completed as the Kissinger Report, establishing global
23 depopulation as US geopolitical strategy.
24
25
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 51 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 52

1 1975/11/26 – President Gerald Ford endorsed the Kissinger Report’s depopulation plan
2 through National Security Decision Memorandum 314
3

4
5 Let us first therefore look at the (USA) DoD DEPOPULATION plan:
6
7 Let us look as Deagel.com (http://www.deagel.com/country/forecast.aspx) population forecast
8 of 2017 and in particular, the current countries hit with COVID-19!
9
10 Name Country 2017 2025 Reduction %
11
12 United Kingdom 65,650,000 14,517,860 51,132,140 77.886%
13 Ireland 5,010,000 1,318,740 3,691,260 73.678%
14 Germany 80,590,000 28,134,920 52,455,080 65.089%
15 Spain 48,960,000 27,763,280 21,196,720 43.294%
16
17 France 67,100,000 39,114,580 27,985,420 41.707%
18 Switzerland 8,240,000 5,342,540 2,897,460 35.163%
19 Denmark 5,600,000 3,771,760 1,828,240 32.647%
20 Belgium 11,490,000 8,060,900 3,429,100 29.844%
21
22 Italy 62,140,000 43,760,260 18,379,740 29.578%
23 Austria 8,750,000 6,215,000 2,535,000 28.971%
24 Ukraine 44,030,000 31,628,980 12,401,020 28.165%
25 Norway 5,320,000 3,833,960 1,486,040 27.933%
26
27 Portugal 10,840,000 8,113,860 2,726,140 25.149%
28 Poland 38,480,000 33,230,780 5,249,220 13.641%
29
30 TOTALS 462,200,000 254,807,420 207,392,580 44.871%
31
32 United States of America 326,620,000 99,553,100 227,066,900 69.520%
33
34 Australia 23,230,000 15,196,600 8,033,400 34.582%
35
36 And to silence critics they went on to pay handsomely the media (albeit also unconstitutionally)
37 as I understood was what Event201 October 2019 was indicating, as to prevent others to become
38 aware of their murderous DEPOPULATION scam. The eSafety Commissioner, Ombudsman,
39 Human Rights Commissioners were simploy AWOL (Absent Without Leave) and if anything
40 not just refused to enforce constitutional rights but rather supported this TREASONOUS
41 conduct and let DICTATORSHIP & TERRORISM be the rule of the day.
42 END QUOTE 20230728-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl
43 101F- DEMOCIDE 2.0
44
45 There can be no question about it that the Australian Federal Police in my view engaged in
46 malfeasants where it ignored to investigate the mass murders and other harm upon Australians.
47
48 And TGA John Skerritt I understand went along with whatever the Americans pursued and failed
49 to take proper action to prevent undue harm. During Senate estimates I understood he admitted
50 not to have performed certain test.
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 52 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 53

1
2 Also, the content of the vail used for the “clinical trials” were not the same as what was later
3 injected into Australians. APHRA and others I understood interfering with the doctor-patient
4 relationships, etc, and also we had pharmacist/chemist and their staff injecting a “gene therapy”
5 DEPOPULATION “bio weapon” in violation of legal requirements of Australia’s mand
6 International bio security legislations.
7
8 Politicians seemed to me to be after what they could get out of it.
9
10 And then Premier Daniele Andrews was in my view defrauding billions of dollars that belonged
11 to the commonwealth, when he reportedly made an agreement regarding leasing the ports and
12 use the About $9 billion not for Harbor improvements but most of it was not at all used for
13 harbor issues. This the Framers of the Constitution made very clear would violate Section 92 of
14 the constitution. It essentially was an unconstitutional taxation, this as to corporations that paid
15 out the monies to the State of Victoria would now have to claim it back in harbor charges
16 violating the free intercourse provisions.
17 There and numerous other issues have been extensively canvassed in my documentation to the
18 Australian Federal Police and others.
19
20 The latest bunch are:
21
22 3 June 2024 52 pages 7097 pages Supplement 110A
23 https://www.scribd.com/document/738735128/20240603-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-R-Kershaw-Chief-
24 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-110A-Deadly-Pursuit-Arrest-Etc
25
26 6 June 2024 83 pages 7180 pages Supplement 110B
27 https://www.scribd.com/document/739571316/20240606-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-R-Kershaw-Chief-
28 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-110B-Deadly-Pursuit-Arrest-Etc
29
30 7 June 2024 91 pages 7271 pages Supplement 110C
31 https://www.scribd.com/document/739881430/20240607-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-R-Kershaw-Chief-
32 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-110C-Deadly-Pursuit-Arrest-Etc
33
34 Then there is also extensive writings to numerous others, including to the lawyers and
35 councillors themselves, which can be provided to you also.
36
37 I am not aware the Australian Federal Police directed any of my published documents to be
38 removed, albeit since the “Voice” scam was going on in 2023 I noticed that Scribd started to
39 shadow ban certain articles., which I understand was unconstitutionally requested by the federal
40 government.
41

42
43
44 Here we have the Victorian Government having deceived Victorians and then terrorized them
45 with MANDATES and inflicting horrendous harm upon many Victorians, including businesses,
46 and then Daniel Andrews resigned with allegedly a $300,000 pay a year and getting Kings

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 53 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 54

1 birthday honours. Where is the constitutional right for Daniel Andrews and so anyone else to get
2 such a pay for the rest of his natural life having wrecked Victorians economy and the lives of so
3 many Victorians?
4 The States were created in s106 “subject to this constitution” and Daniel Andrews in my view
5 committed serious crimes when the accident with the pushbike eventuated. In my view had the
6 truth been told then more than likely he never would have been allowed to become Premier.
7 Despite allegedly 3 former judges of the High Court of Australia claiming that the Voice
8 referendum was not conflicting with constitutional provisions the reality is, this because it would
9 have clashed with Section 25 of the constitution and also with Subsection 521(xxvi) of the
10 constitution. Like most of the constitution Ss51(xxvi) is considerably misunderstood.
11
12 Also, any backbencher simply is entitled to an “allowance” which is not a “salary”.
13
14 To convert part of an allowance into some super get-rich scheme superannuation fund would
15 violate S44 of the constitution. After all, all Commonwealth laws must be “UNIFORM” and
16 therefore, unless the scheme was open to all Victorians it couldn’t be deemed to be a ordinary
17 legitimate process.
18
19 We also had this utter and sheer nonsense that the governor-General purportedly invited King
20 Charles to be King of Australia. Australia is not a monarchy and cannot have a servant inviting
21 his employer to become the master.
22
23 Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
24 QUOTE
25 Mr. SYMON ( South Australia ).-
26 In the preamble honorable members will find that what we desire to do is to unite in one
27 indissoluble Federal Commonwealth -that is the political Union-"under the Crown of the
28 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland , and under the Constitution hereby
29 established." Honorable members will therefore see that the application of the word
30 Commonwealth is to the political Union which is sought to be established. It is not
31 intended there to have any relation whatever to the name of the country or nation which we
32 are going to create under that Union . The second part of the preamble goes on to say that it
33 is expedient to make provision for the admission of other colonies into the Commonwealth.
34 That is, for admission into this political Union, which is not a republic, which is not to
35 be called a dominion, kingdom, or empire, but is to be a Union by the name of
36 "Commonwealth," and I do not propose to interfere with that in the slightest degree.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 HANSARD 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
40 QUOTE
41 Mr. BARTON.-I did not say that. I say that our real status is as subjects, and that
42 we are all alike subjects of the British Crown.
43 END QUOTE
44
45 Hansard 6-4-1897 Constitution convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
46 Australasian Convention)
47 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN:
48 In the first instance, the power of the Crown itself is nowhere defined, and cannot be defined under this
49 constitution.
50 END QUOTE
51
52 It must be very clear it is TREASON to pursue a referendum for a republic!
53
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 54 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 55

1
2
3 And we have this Governor-General designate who claims that there was a “bloody invasion” by
4 Captain Cook. And this too underline how incompetent and divisive this person is because there
5 was no such invasion as she portrays.
6
7 40-0121
8 QUOTE Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already claimed by the Dutch?
9 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Do+you+accept+that+C
10 ap+Cook+did+not+invade+"New+Holland"+as+it+was+already+claimed+by+the+Dutch
11 %3F
12 Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already
13 claimed by the Dutch?
14
15 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
16 Answer:
17 No, Captain Cook did not invade “New Holland” as it was already claimed by the
18 Dutch.
19 The story of Lieutenant James Cook and British Sovereignty over Australia has been
20 somewhat misconstrued. While Cook did chart the east coast of New Holland (Australia)
21 in 1770 during his voyage, his primary mission was not to claim the land for Britain.
22 Cook’s initial objective was to reach Tahiti to study the Transit of Venus and then search
23 for the mythical Great Southern Land, Terra Australis.
24 When Cook was heading back after mapping New Zealand (Aotearoa), he intended to
25 return via Cape Horn in South America to potentially discover Terra Australis. However,
26 due to the condition of his ship, he decided to sail north along the east coast of New
27 Holland towards Batavia (Java) for repairs and supplies. Cook’s intention was not to
28 invade or claim New Holland but rather to navigate a route back home that would benefit
29 his mission.
30 Cook’s journal entries indicate that he consulted with his officers on the best route to take
31 for their return journey, ultimately deciding to sail west until they reached the East Coast
32 of New Holland and then follow its direction northward. The decision to explore parts of
33 New Holland was based on practical considerations and the need for provisions rather than
34 a deliberate invasion or claim of sovereignty.
35 Therefore, it can be concluded that Captain Cook did not invade “New Holland” as it was
36 already claimed by the Dutch, and his exploration of the east coast of Australia was part of
37 a larger navigational journey rather than a conquest.
38 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
39 1. National Library of Australia
40 2. Australian National Maritime Museum
41 3. State Library of New South Wales
42 These sources provided historical records, journals, and archives related to Captain James
43 Cook’s voyages and explorations in Australia, offering valuable insights into the events
44 surrounding his navigation along the coast of New Holland.
45 Web Search Results
46 5 results
47
48 New Holland (Australia)
49 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › New_Holland_(Australia)
50 New Holland (Australia)

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 55 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 56

1 New Holland was never settled by the Dutch people, whose colonial forces and buoyant
2 population had a settled preference for the Dutch Cape Colony, Dutch ...
3
4 Why do the Dutch think that they discovered Australia before ...
5 https//www.quora.com › Why-do-the-Dutch-think-that-they-discovered-Australia-before-
6 the-British
7 Why do the Dutch think that they discovered Australia before ...
8 The Dutch called it “New Holland”, rather strangely because it looked nothing remotely
9 like Holland. They were quite unimpressed with the areas ...
10
11 'Over Cooked': Is Captain Cook the source of British sovereignty in ...
12 http//nationalunitygovernment.org › content › over-cooked-captain-cook-source-british-
13 sovereignty-australia
14 'Over Cooked': Is Captain Cook the source of British sovereignty in ...
15 Another oddity in the story is that Cook's Journal speaks of it not being widely known
16 whether a strait exists between New Holland and New Guinea, but back in ...
17
18 The Search for 'Terra Australis'
19 https//www.nationalarchives.gov.uk › education › resources › the-search-for-terra-australis
20 The Search for 'Terra Australis'
21 Why do you think it's important for Cook to be sure that he is the first European to visit
22 before he claims the lands? Can you find out where 'New Holland' is?
23
24 The Blind Spot on Our Indigenous History
25 https//www.linkedin.com › pulse › blind-spot-our-indigenous-history-leon-gettler
26 The Blind Spot on Our Indigenous History
27 The guide does not say that Cook “invaded” the country, merely that he was the first
28 Englishman to map the coast of New Holland. It points ...
29 END QUOTE Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already claimed by the
30 Dutch?
31
32 So much for mis/disinformation legislation when the very people in charge are the worst
33 offenders, and with it causes more problems. After all those vandalizing statutes of Captain Cook
34 I view are doing so because of the deliberate false and misleading claims by those who are
35 homegrown enemies of Australia.
36
37 https://www.globalresearch.ca/breaking-covid-jabs-blame-increase-excess-deaths-
38 telegraph/5859006
39 After 3 Years of Censorship; Mainstream Media Now Confirms that “COVID Jabs
40 May be to Blame for Increase in Excess Deaths”
41
42 https://www.globalresearch.ca/childhood-vaccine-greatest-decline-public-
43 health/5857883?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_ar
44 ticles
45 Childhood Vaccine Schedule Led to ‘Greatest Decline in Public Health in Human
46 History’
47
48 https://newsaddicts.com/misinformation-surrounding-fdas-communication-on-ivermectin-
49 and-cdcs-handling-of-vaccine-myocarditis-along-with-other-
50 findings/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_source_platform=mailpoet&u
51 tm_campaign=newsletter
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 56 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 57

1 Misinformation Surrounding FDA’s Communication on Ivermectin and CDC’s

2 Handling of Vaccine Myocarditis, Along with Other Findings
3
4 https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/early-signs-that-covid-19-
5 propaganda?utm_source=post-email-
6 title&publication_id=1103773&post_id=145360025&utm_campaign=email-post-
7 title&isFreemail=true&r=1a0316&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
8 Early Signs that COVID-19 Propaganda Used Fear to Exert Authoritarian Power and
9 Induce Human Rights Violations
10 October 20, 2021: By convincing citizens to concede to participate in self-harm with
11 mRNA nanoparticle injections, those who claim to be our protectors and partners are
12 destroying our nation.
13
14 https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/notice-of-war-crimes-to-health-care
15 Notice of War Crimes To Health Care Providers and Health Insurance Providers
16 QUOTE
17 KATHERINE WATT
18 FEB 24, 2023
19
20 Orientation for new readers.
21
22 If you decide to use this notice, print out two copies and keep a signed copy for your
23 records. If you want to revise the text before taking it to a medical appointment, download
24 and edit the Word version.
25 Notice of War Crimes to Health Care Providers and Health Insurance Corporations (PDF)
26 Notice of War Crimes to Health Care Providers and Health Insurance Corporations (Word)
27 NOTICE OF WAR CRIMES
28 If you have been promoting or using products known as "Covid-19 vaccines" on patients
29 since December 2020, you have been participating in fraud, mass murder and war crimes,
30 because medical countermeasures (MCMs), covered countermeasures, and prototype
31 products are DOD-contracted bioweapons intended and effective for injuring, sickening
32 and killing recipients.
33 You may not have known or understood your participation in fraud, mass murder and war
34 crimes before today. I am now informing you; you have now been given notice.
35 This document provides:
36 NOTICE OF DEMAND that YOU, PROVIDER, CEASE AND DESIST from committing
37 acts of additional fraud, mass murder and war crimes, effective as of the date of this notice,
38 and immediately close your vaccination and immunization programs.
39 NOTICE OF MY REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN OR SUBMIT TO, acts of fraud, mass
40 murder, war crimes and financial crimes you may attempt to commit today or during future
41 visits to your facility.
42 NOTICE OF MY INTENT TO PROSECUTE you for fraud, mass murder, war crimes and
43 financial crimes you commit today or during future visits to your facility, by providing
44 witness testimony and other evidence; and
45 DEMAND FOR NOTICE - If you intend to restrict my access to medical care, today or
46 during future visits, due to my refusal to participate in, aid or abet the commission of
47 crimes, notify me immediately, in writing, of the terms and conditions of such access
48 restrictions.
49 I, [John Doe], hereby notify you, [physician, nurse, pharmacist, medical student or other
50 'vaccinator,' 'qualified person,' or 'covered person' as designated under PREP Act, 42 USC

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 57 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 58

1 § 247d-6d(i)(8); 42 USC 247d-6d(c)(4), and related declarations, determinations, notices,

2 regulations and guidance issued by the Department of Health and Human Services.]
3 1. Individuals claiming to represent the US Government are engaged in a global chemical
4 and biological warfare program to sicken, injure and kill targets. They are operating a
5 chemical and biological weapons production, distribution and deployment program,
6 through the US Department of Defense, US Department of Health and Human Services,
7 federal, state and local health agencies and organizations, and pharmaceutical
8 manufacturing corporations. They are funding, producing, stockpiling, and deploying
9 lethal bioweapons fraudulently labeled, marketed and promoted as "Covid-19 vaccines,"
10 through your hands and the hands of other medical care providers around the world.
11 2. These DOD bioweapons have now contaminated the development, manufacture, supply,
12 distribution and dispensing of all pharmaceutical products throughout the world. All
13 products promoted, marketed or labeled as "immunizations" and "vaccines" are now
14 presumptively toxic.
15 3. In 1996, Congress and President Clinton passed legislation arising from the Nuremberg
16 trials and the Nuremberg Code, to protect Americans from war criminals committing war
17 crimes, including torture, mutilation, maiming and murder. See 18 USC 2441.
18 4. I therefore formally REFUSE TO SUBMIT to any and all "immunization" and/or
19 "vaccination" procedures from this date forward. It is not moral or lawful for me to submit
20 to, commit, endorse, participate in or facilitate fraud, mass murder or war crimes.
21 5. The causal relationships between DOD bioweapons injections, and target injuries and
22 deaths, were known to DOD and HHS officials, and to contract manufacturers, in Spring
23 2020, when the events fraudulently presented to the public as "clinical trials" began.
24 6. Thousands of health care providers have observed severe adverse effects (morbidity)
25 and deaths (mortality) experienced by targets of DOD bioweapons since the covert, fraud-
26 based, mass murder attack on the general public began in December 2020, and yet the
27 criminal enterprise continues because you and other providers continue to participate in it.
28 7. To the extent you do not yet understand the military killing campaign in which you have
29 been participating, I will provide you with supporting evidence and analysis upon request.
30 8. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently announced several new
31 ICD-10 codes for use by health care providers, health insurance companies, government
32 agencies and/or international non-governmental organizations such as the World Health
33 Organization. These ICD-10 codes include but are not limited to:
34 ICD-10-CM Z28.0-, immunization not carried out because of contraindication
35 ICD-10-CM Z28.1-, immunization not carried out because of patient decision for reasons
36 of belief or group pressure
37 ICD-10-CM Z28.2-, immunization not carried out because of patient decision for other and
38 unspecified reason
39 ICD-10-CM Z28.3, underimmunization status
40 ICD-10-CM Z28.31, underimmunization for COVID-19 status
41 ICD-10-CM Z28.310, unvaccinated for COVID-19
42 ICD-10-CM Z28.311, partially vaccinated for COVID-19
43 9. Through IRS Form 1095, my employer-sponsored health insurance information and
44 Social Security number are electronically accessible to the US Department of the Treasury.
45 Through IRS Form 1040 and analogous forms, my bank routing and account numbers and
46 Social Security number are also electronically accessible to the US Department of
47 Treasury.
48 10. Therefore, your act of recording and/or submitting ICD-10 data regarding my
49 REFUSAL TO SUBMIT to DOD bioweapons attacks, to my health insurance provider,
50 employer and federal and international agencies, will expose me to digital theft of my
51 financial resources by the IRS and Department of Treasury; digitally-blocked access to
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 58 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 59

1 banking and financial transaction services; and resulting harms including joblessness,
2 homelessness and hunger.
3 11. Your use of CDC-recommended ICD-10 Z28 codes from this date forward, aids and
4 abets crimes under laws prohibiting fraud, coercion, theft, extortion, and related financial
5 crimes. I therefore demand that you DO NOT LOG any "immunization" or "vaccination"
6 ICD-10 codes into my medical records, digital, paper or any other format.
7 12. Effective as of the date of this Notice of War Crimes, any further conduct by you or
8 your employees in furtherance of DOD bioweapons attacks on me shall be construed as
9 your knowing, willing, intentional and malicious participation in fraud, mass murder, war
10 crimes and financial crimes.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 New comment on In Memory of the Dead and the Dying: Appellate Brief Filed
14 QUOTE
15 Dr. Joseph Sansone
16 From:[email protected]
17 To:[email protected]
18 Mon, 10 June at 12:11 pm
19 Dr. Joseph Sansone replied to your comment on In Memory of the Dead and the Dying:
20 Appellate Brief Filed.
21 Yes it is public info once it was filed.
22 END QUOTE
23
24 IMPORTANT NOTICE
25 I below quote details of an appeal court filing by Dr Joseph Sansone, who made known I could
26 use the publication as I do below. However the following Authority may have a dramtic impact
27 upon the appeal!
28
29 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/breaking-9th-circuit-court-appeals-rules-mrna-
30 covid/
31 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Acknowledges Plaintiffs’ Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Jab is
32 NOT a Vaccine, But a Therapeutic
33 QUOTE
34 Vaccine– “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against
35 diseases.”
36 It can be recalled that Pfizer’s President of International Developed Markets, Janine
37 Small, admitted in an EU hearing that the vaccine had never been tested on its ability
38 to prevent transmission, contrary to what was previously advertised.
39 END QUOTE
40
41 It should be understood that while America law can and do at times differ than Australian law,
42 taking this in consideration however, American Law can be relied upon as “complimentary law”
43 where the Commonwealth of Australia has no such particular legislative provisions as is with
44 Authorities such as court judgments.
45 Also, consideration should be given to the fact that in the Commonwealth of Australia unlike in
46 the USA the death toll during 2020 was lower than average excess death.
47
48 I certainly express my thanks to Dr Joseph Sansone and others, who assisted him for their
49 contribution to seek to pursue JUSTICE.
50
51 We have politicians who when elected are out for re-election rather than to represent their
52 electorate in a proper manner.
53
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 59 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 60

1
2 We all must work together to hold politicians and their collaborators legally accountable for the
3 harm and certainly also the deaths they inflicted upon their victims.
4
5 When I commenced to pursue matters of the “covid scam” to be stopped on constitutional
6 grounds I found that the Victorian Ombudsman claimed not to have any jurisdiction but advised
7 that IBAC could do so and my complaint to the Victorian Human Rights Commissioner was left
8 unattended. IBAC then responded on 19 April 2020 that it was not a matter of “public interest”.
9 Moment, we have unconstitutional MANDATES, we have a veterinarian dictating the medical
10 profession, we have Victorian being killed, etc, and all this is not of “public interest”?
11 Well, tell that to the people who cannot control their bodies due to the harm inflicted upon them
12 by the “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION “bio weapon” jabs!
13 Just consider had a proper investigation been held way back in April 2020 then likely most if not
14 all subsequent victims would never have ended up being victims, let alone be killed!
15
16 I have included numerous other subject matters, this so that the ACIC cannot say railroad a
17 COMPLAINT as it being just one issue, as IBAC did. Australians lives are still at risk, as is that
18 of my son Mark, and I for one can state had politicians and others considered my writings this
19 whole “covid scam” could have been ended way back in 2020!
20
21 QUOTE In Memory of the Dead and the Dying- Appellate Brief Filed
22 I have just downloaded the lot of this page. I reside in Australia but one of my sons (41y) was
23 forced to have the jabs while working for Holden or lose his job. Then he was the following
24 month forced to have a second jab. I was not aware that he had the jabs. After he had the jab's
25 Holden downsized and he lost his job. About 2 months ago he was given the medical advice he
26 has a life expectancy of 2 months to 2 years but if he has another medical episode then it could
27 be as little as a week. He was without a job, in a lot of pain, lost the room he was renting and
28 ended up homeless sleeping in parks. He concealed this from me. He (last year) was going to
29 purchase a very cheap second-hand car but I indicated he could use the station wagon we had,
30 and we pay the registration, insurance and on the road repair cost. It was only this year I happen
31 to discover that he suffers from a turbo cancer and is in a lot of pain. In the last few weeks, he
32 has been some 5 times in hospital but on 7 June he discharged himself because he made clear to
33 me he was not going to mis out celebrating my birthday! I however have a blog
34 https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati and you find that since April 2020 I filed numerous
35 complaints (I am a constitutionalist) that the MANDATES were unconstitutional, etc. My blog
36 shows how extensive I pursued matters, without knowing my son would become a victim! Now,
37 I have already notified 2 law firms I will pursue criminal action against their clients. While your
38 details relate to the USA nevertheless I in the past used American caselaw to defeat the
39 Commonwealth and as such, I know how I can use American case law, etc. My documents on
40 Scribd can be downloaded and I do not charge for anyone doing so., this as JUSTICE never
41 should be for sale. Anyhow can you let me know if I can use your material?
42
43 In Memory of the Dead and the Dying: Appellate Brief Filed
44
45 DR. JOSEPH SANSONE
46 The ongoing genocide has to stop. In memory of the dead and the dying, I filed my appellate
47 brief today. To summarize actions to date. The original Emergency Petition for a Writ of
48 Mandamus was filed on March 3rd, 2024, in the Florida Supreme Court. This seeks to compel
49 Governor DeSantis to prohibit the distribution of COVID 19 injections in the State of Florida
50 and compel Attorney General Moody to confiscate the vials. It was then transferred to the Circuit
51 Court in Leon County on March 20th, 2024. On April 9th, 2024, the Circuit Court dismissed the
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 60 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 61

1 case. I filed a motion for reconsideration on April 14th, 2024. This motion was denied on April
2 15th, 2024. I filed a motion for rehearing on April 21st, 2024. This motion was denied on April
3 22nd, 2024. I filed a notice of appeal in the First District Court of Appeal later that day. After the
4 Appellate Court directed me to modify my certification of service, I filed an amended notice of
5 appeal on May 3rd, 2024. Today on May 27th, 2024, I filed the appellate brief below.
6 I am doing this pro se. This is for a couple reasons. This is partly because many attorneys are
7 afraid of the Bar and the Judges. In addition, if an attorney were threatened otherwise, I can’t
8 rely on them not buckling. I also could not afford the cost an attorney would have charged me to
9 do this as it would have been astronomical. Still, there is considerable cost for me. This process
10 consumes a tremendous amount of time and energy, researching case law and court procedures,
11 as well as writing the briefs and motions. This does take me away from my small niche private
12 practice and I was already set back from my surgery last year.
13 I expect that the appeals process will get more involved and if this path gets blocked, I am
14 already considering different court actions to take. I will need resources to offset these loses. If
15 you can afford to contribute, you can contribute here through GiveSendGo or Ko-Fi. Or you can
16 mail a check to me at my office 27499 Riverview Center Blvd.. Bonita Springs, FL, 34134.
17 Please only donate if you can afford to.
18 The appellate brief is below. Due to the size of the document I had to break the screen shots up
19 into a few sections.
20 Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone is a reader-supported publication. To
21 receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
22

23
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 61 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 62

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 62 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 63

12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 63 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 64

1
2 END QUOTE In Memory of the Dead and the Dying- Appellate Brief Filed
3
4 We cannot bring back the dead but we certainly can honour them by holding the evil doers
5 legally accountable. This 3-part COMPLAINT will also be made available to others (including
6 via emails) as to ensure it will not be kept hidden to shield the evil doers.
7
8 DISCLOSURE: One of my daughter’s first (female) cousins by marriage of an Australian of
9 Aboriginal descent has 5 children.,
10
11 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
12
13 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
14 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

15 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

16 (Our name is our motto!)
12-6-2024 Part 1 of 3 Page 64 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati