0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views11 pages

Ge-Ssoc 1 - Teriminal Requirement 020

Uploaded by

s.booc.545907
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views11 pages

Ge-Ssoc 1 - Teriminal Requirement 020

Uploaded by

s.booc.545907
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

DAVAO CENTRAL COLLEGE

Juan Dela Cruz, St. Toril, Davao City


College of Business Administration/College of Justice Education

TERMINAL REQUIREMENT IN GE SSOC 1 – SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND SOCIETY

Submitted to:

LOREDEL A. ALICANTE, LPT, MAED-CAR


Instructor

Submitted by:

Glyce Maxwell Martel


Jeremy N. Serjas
Dino Michael G. Arobo
Noreal Cobol

1
JUNE 202

Title

I. Summary of the case study (The reference for this should be put in R1)
II. Stakeholder analysis
III. Personal reflection (Limit your reflection paper to 300-500 words)
Student 1 (Write your LAST NAME, FIRST NAME)
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
Student 5
IV. Recommendations
V. References (APA Format)
R1:

2
I. Summary of the case study (The reference for this should be put in R1)

What is artificial intelligence?

Ans:. Making intelligent devices, particularly intelligent computer programs, is a scientific


and engineering endeavor. It is associated with the comparable task of

use computers to study human intellect, however AI need not

restrict itself to physiologically observable approaches.

Sometimes, although hardly ever or even regularly. In one sense, we can

By observing, you can learn more about how to program robots to solve issues.

either by witnessing how we behave or that of others. Conversely, the majority of

Working in AI requires researching the challenges that intelligence faces in the real world.

instead of researching humans or animals. Researchers in AI are free to employ


techniques

Yes, but what is intelligence?

Ans: Intelligence is the computational part of the ability to achieve goals in

the world. Varying kinds and

Intelligence involves mechanisms, and AI research has discovered how to make


computers carry out some of them and not others. If doing a task requires only
mechanisms that are well understood today, computer programs can give very
impressive performances on these tasks. Such programs should be considered
“somewhat intelligent”

Doesn't AI aim to replicate human intelligence?

3
Ans: Sometimes, although hardly ever or even regularly. In one sense, we can

By observing, you can learn more about how to program robots to solve issues.

either by witnessing how we behave or that of others. Conversely, the majority of

Working in AI requires researching the challenges that intelligence faces in the real world.

instead of researching humans or animals. Researchers in AI are free to employ


techniques that haven't been tested on humans or require a lot more processing.

than what humans are capable of.

II.Stakeholder analysis

What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence?

The goal of explainability techniques, according to prior research in Explainable

Artificial Intelligence (XAI), is to meet particular interests, aims, expectations,

wants, and demands for artificial systems (we refer to these as "stakeholders'

desiderata") in a range of scenarios. However, there is a substantial body of

information on XAI that is dispersed over numerous, mostly unrelated fields. As a

result, it is frequently unclear how explainability techniques are expected to fulfill

stakeholders' requirements. The primary stakeholder groups asking for the

explicability of artificial systems are discussed in this study, along with their

demands. We offer a model that explicitly lays out the key ideas and connections

one must think about, adjust for, select, and create explainability techniques that

are meant to satisfy stakeholders' requirements. The researchers can use this

modelcan provide as a common ground for researchers from the many diverse

fields participating in XAI. It highlights areas where the development and

assessment of explainability techniques have multidisciplinary promise.

This focuses XAI research on a number of essential issues. First, the main

research targets are artificial systems. Such systems can include those that

4
adhere to a predetermined set of rules, systems that are expert and knowledge-

based, systems that depend on machine learning, and more. When these systems

are too complicated for human control or are fundamentally opaque, preventing

human understanding, XAI research insights become crucial [8]. The relevance of

methods that enable or offer insights into artificial systems, their operation, and

their outputs is also emphasized by this perspective on XAI. These methodologies,

processes, and tactics (which we refer to as "explainability approaches") aim to

offer explanatory information that will aid in our understanding of artificial systems.

III. Personal Limit reflection

Glyce Maxwell Martel

The focus of AI and robotics is frequently on "concerns" of different kinds, which is a

usual reaction to new technologies. Many of these worries turn out to be rather quaint

(trains are too fast for souls), some are predictably wrong when they claim that

technology will fundamentally alter humans (telephones will destroy personal

communication, writing will destroy memory, and video cassettes will make going out

redundant), some are generally true but only marginally relevant (digital technology will

destroy industries that produce photographic film, cassette tapes, or vinyl records), but

some are legitimate. The purpose of a piece like this is to analyze the problems and dispel

the myths. Artificial intelligence will increase human productivity but also put human

autonomy, agency, and capabilities in jeopardy. They discussed the numerous

possibilities, including the possibility that computers could one day match or even surpass

human intelligence and capabilities in areas like complex decision-making, reasoning,

and learning, as well as in areas like advanced analytics and pattern recognition, visual

acuity, speech recognition, and language translation. They claimed that "smart"

technologies in cities, cars, buildings, utilities, farms, and business operations will save

time, money, and lives while providing chances for people to enjoy a more individualized

5
future. But humans could greatly benefit from AI. Many people, however, disagree and

claim that AI will replace humans in the workforce. They neglect to take into account that

humans can pursue other jobs that involve the things humans are good at as AI takes over

those jobs and does them better to benefit society more broadly.

Most people used to work in agriculture back in the day, but as technology advanced,

people were able to enter other, more specialized areas. Due to AI's ability to perform the

more laborious tasks, specialization will continue as people pursue more fun careers. The

burden of individuals already employed in those tiresome jobs can be lifted by AI.

Additionally, a lot more occupations will become available because of AI.

IV. Recommendations

AI actors should respect the rule of law, human rights and democratic values,

throughout the AI system lifecycle. These include freedom, dignity and autonomy,

privacy and data protection, non-discrimination and equality, diversity, fairness,

social justice, and internationally recognised labour rights

AI has the potential to improve the welfare and well-being of people, to

contribute to positive sustainable global economic activity, to increase

innovation and productivity, and to help respond to key global challenges;

These changes could have varying effects within societies and economies as well

as between them, especially in terms of economic change, competition, changes

in the labor market, ineimplications for democracy and human rights, privacy and

6
data protection, and digital security;qualitie.

the trustworthiness of AI systems is a key factor for the diffusion and adoption of

AI, even though the nature of future AI applications and their implications may be

difficult to foresee; and that a well-informed whole-of-society public debate is

necessary for capturing the beneficial potential of the technology, while limiting

the risks associated with it;.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies and tools play a key role in every aspect of

the COVID-19 crisis response. This Recommendation provides a set of

internationally-agreed principles and recommendations that can promote an AI-

powered crisis response that is trustworthy and respects human-centred and

democratic values. For further information on this Recommendation and its

relevance to COVID-19 response and recovery, see the background information

below.

AI- and machine learning-enabled technologies are used in medicine, transportation,

robotics, science, education, the military, surveillance, finance and its regulation,

agriculture, entertainment, retail, customer service, and manufacturing.

7
v
References

https://www.immerse.education/study-t ips/artificial-intelligence-case

study/?fbcl What_is_artificial_intelligence_Case_study_artificial_intelligence

What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? – A stakeholder

perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI

research Author links open overlay panelMarkus Langer a 1, Daniel Oster

b 1, Timo Speith b c 1, Holger Hermanns c d, Lena Kästner b, Eva

Schmidte, Andreas Sesing f, Kevin Baum b c

8
John McCarthy Computer Science Department Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305

[email protected] http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/ 2007

Nov 12, 2:05 a.m.

Revised November 12, 2007

Jean Khalfa (ed.) Cambridge University Press (1994)

James H. Fetzer Chapter 757 Accesses 8 Citations

Part of the Studies in Cognitive Systems book series (COGS,volume 4)

9
Rubric for Ethical Case Studies and Reflection Paper

Criteria Excellent (10-9) Good (8-7) Fair (6-5) Poor (4-3)


Analysis Thoroughly and Provides a clear Provides some Inadequate or
effectively analysis with analysis, but lacks minimal analysis
analyzes the some gaps or depth or
ethical issues and limited depth thoroughness
implications of
the case studies
Application of Applies relevant Applies relevant Partially applies Fails to apply
Ethical ethical theories ethical theories ethical theories ethical theories
Frameworks and and frameworks and frameworks and frameworks and frameworks
Perspectives with with some with limited
comprehensive inconsistencies understanding
understanding
Critical Reflection Reflects deeps on Provides insightful Provide some Lacks reflection
personal values reflection on reflection on or minimal
and beliefs in personal values personal values reflection
relation to the and beliefs in and beliefs
case studies and relation to the
the course case studies
content
Alternative Propose creative Presents viable Suggests limited Fails to provide or
Solutions and well-justified and alternative alternative lacks alternative
alternative solutions with solutions or lacks solutions or
solutions some justification. justification. justification
Integration of the Skillfully Effectively Partially Fails to integrate
Course Content integrates course integrates course integrates course source content or
content and content and content with lacks of
demonstrates a demonstrates limited understanding
deep understanding of understanding
understanding of the concepts,
the concept theories, and
theories, and frameworks
frameworks

10
Curriculum Vitae

11

You might also like