Stratjourn Vol 4 Series 2023
Stratjourn Vol 4 Series 2023
CONTENTS
AUTHORS
4 ONSSSM Events
For the First Time Ever: PN’s Experts’
Dialogue 2023 talks about cyber resiliency
Kyle Esther E Cardona
Miguel Angelo A De Castro
Jan Emil N Langomez
Vincent Kyle D Parada
Altamira Chantrelle M Reyes
Queenie Mhaye S Valencia
10 ASEAN Affairs
ASEAN and the Philippines on Australia’s
Strategic Partnership: Issues and
Implications
DISCLAIMER: The articles published in the
StratJournal were written by ONSSSM authors in their
personal capacity. In this regard, the opinions in this
14 Philippine Relations
The Importance of the US-Philippines
Alliance in the Region: The Philippines as a
volume are those of the authors. They do not reflect
the position, policy, or decision of the Philippine Navy,
Lynchpin to the US Indo-Pacific Strategy in the Armed Forces of the Philippines, and the Philippine
ASEAN Government.
20 Policy Trends
Should the Philippines Legislate a National
Marine Code?
23 Philippine Relations
Reaffirming the ‘Golden Age’ of Philippines-
Japan Relations
2
The StratJournal is a publication of the Office of Naval Strategic Studies and Strategy
Management (ONSSSM), devoted to strategic, national, regional, and international issues
and developments that have significant impact on maritime and naval security.
For parties interested to subscribe or submit an article for prospective publication, you
can reach us at [email protected]
3
STRATJOURNAL Office of Naval Strategic Studies
Volume 4 CY 2023 and Strategy Management
Figure 1. The Philippine Navy conducts the Experts' Dialogue 2023 via Zoom platform
(Source: Philippine Navy)
On October 25, 2023, the Developing Cyber Resiliency Circumscribing the military’s
Office of Naval Strategic Studies Strategies to Mitigate Future role in the cyber domain
a n d S t rat e g y M a n a g e m e nt Threats” aims to gather local and One of the main
(ONSSSM), Philippine Nav y international cyber/cybersecurity points highlighted during the
conducted its annual Experts’ experts to share their perspectives discussion is the convergences
Dialogue to promote purposive concerning current cyber threats in cyberspace and how the
discussions that centered on and rationalize the military’s role in military should rationalize its
the topic of cyber resiliency. the cyber domain to operationalize role in addressing cyber threats.
The Experts’ Dialogue is an comprehensive cyber resiliency During the discussion, one of
annual convening that serves strategy. This is a special event the panel experts raised that the
as an avenue for experts and as this is the first time the military should not do everything
practitioners from the academe Experts’ Dialogue tackled topics concerning the cyber domain
and the defense sector to bridge concerning the cyber domain. The as the military would not be
d i ffe re n c e s i n p e rc e pt i o n s ; discussion was also aligned with able to cover all the activities
enable the exchange of ideas; and the recently approved National in cyberspace. The military in
reach a unified understanding Security Policy 2023-2028 which the cyber domain must have a
of the much-needed policy
states that the cyber domain is circumscribed mission set as 90%
initiatives. This year’s Experts’
an important security concern of cyber activity takes place in the
Dialogue 2023 with the theme
that affects the country’s national private sector. To rationalize its
“Beyond the Fourth Domain:
interests. role, it is therefore important for
the military to know its mission in
4 For the First Time Ever: PN’s Experts’ Dialogue 2023 talks about cyber resiliency
cyberspace. One of these missions
is the ability of the military to gain
and maintain freedom of maneuver
and prevent the adversary from
launching cyber-attacks and this
requires resilience. There is also a
need to circumscribe or define the
military’s activities in cyberspace
since addressing the demands
of the private sector and the rest
of the Philippine government will
expand all the military’s resources.
This is similar to the analogy that
most aviation and maritime activity
does not concern the military as
most cyber activity does not either.
To narrow it further, it is
noteworthy that there are only
four missions for militaries in
cyberspace: crime; intelligence;
Figure 2. The Cyber Domain
information (e.g., shaping (Source: Crowther (2017). The Cyber Defense Review)
cognition, psychological
operations); and cyber operations. that cyber intelligence is the resilience works and they were
In terms of cybercrime, the panel second-most important mission able to protect their critical
expert emphasized that the for militaries in cyberspace, infrastructure from Russia's cyber
military should only be involved in since the Chinese have the most operations with the support of
crimes concerning the Philippine aggressive intelligence-gathering NATO, the US, the UK, France, and
military and defense-related apparatus in the world. Meanwhile, Germany. Proper cyber hygiene
critical infrastructure. Although cyber information operations prevents 80% to 90% of problems
the military does not own all means that the military should and most cyber operations take
the critical infrastructure in the not be guarding the Filipino public place at the tactical level. One way
Philippines and it still depends from information operations, but to maintain this is to circumscribe
on functioning ports and the should only focus on safeguarding the military’s role in the cyber
delivery of fuel, it is still important the personnel in the Philippine domain and identify its priorities.
for the military to be involved in Navy from information operations. Cybersecurity in the Philippines
monitoring and ensuring that Lastly, special and conventional
there is cybersecurity in these operations are cyber operations According to one of the
infrastructures, but not providing supporting the military’s patrol panel experts, the Philippines’
cybersecurity for them. Moreover, craft and command and control cyber security is still at its nascent
as mentioned in the discussion, (C2) therefore having freedom of stage and still faces many
since the Chinese are operating maneuver. Among these, defense structural issues. For instance,
daily in the Philippines and cyber operations are the most it is only recently that the Armed
stealing every piece of data, important since the adversaries Forces of the Philippines (AFP)
the military’s mission in cyber are targeting the PN’s command is developing its cybersecurity
intelligence is to identify the and control. Therefore, the strategy and putting up the AFP
things it needs to safeguard PN should focus its efforts on Cyber Command. One of the
and guard it successfully. The cyber operations and ensure its experts even added that the
panel expert also raised a caveat resilience. As seen in Ukraine,
For the First Time Ever: PN’s Experts’ Dialogue 2023 talks about cyber resiliency 5
STRATJOURNAL Office of Naval Strategic Studies
Volume 4 CY 2023 and Strategy Management
6 For the First Time Ever: PN’s Experts’ Dialogue 2023 talks about cyber resiliency
and Communications Technology
(DICT) to raise awareness and
provide connectivity in far-flung
areas.
M e a nw h i l e, s i n c e t h e
distinction between what is a
cyber crime and what is a state-
sponsored crime is porous in
cybersecurity compounded with
the blurring of the military’s role in
the cyber domain, questions were
raised during the discussion on
how the Philippines could attribute
cross-border issues. According
to one of the panel experts,
there needs to be discussion Figure 3. FOIC PN delivering his closing remarks via Zoom platform
on cross-border issues and (Source: Philippine Navy)
collaboration outside the country.
At present, however, there are still of the panel experts also clarified closing remarks wherein he
questions in the Philippines on that there is a unique distinction mentioned that cyber warfare is not
how the country would address in terms of attribution – who did new and plays an important role in
if a hacker is from a different it? and who is responsible for it? the military. As often highlighted in
country. Therefore, cooperating Not all attributions should be done the discussion, incorporating cyber
with other countries can lead a in public as the larger part of it is resiliency is needed but the military
response towards attribution and mostly done in private confidence. cannot do it alone and necessitates
this is indeed often collaborative It is important to collect and a whole-of-nation approach.
a m o n g d i ffe re nt c o u nt r i e s . analyze information first to look Cybersecurity also goes beyond the
at different decisions before national level and, therefore requires
For instance, the Philippine pointing at a foreign state. Indeed, further collaboration from experts.
military can engage in intelligence- it is impossible to limit cyber Indeed, the ED 2023 contributes to
sharing with other stakeholders defense merely in the context the discussion on cyber resiliency
and the Philippines must look for of the Philippines’ cyberspace and aids in developing new ideas to
supporters and partners including since no single nation can handle inform the PN’s role in crafting and
in the ASEAN. An example of this everything in space as the cyber operationalizing cyber resiliency
collaborative effort is the Microsoft domain knows no boundaries. strategies and enable it to respond
hacking where several countries to the rapidly evolving cyberspace.
The Indo-Pacific is
h i st o r i c a l l y a n d i n h e re nt l y
a geopolitical tool; the term
was first propounded in 1920
by German geographer Karl
Haushofer as Indopazifischen
Raum in his academic work,
"Studies on the Relationship
between Geography and History."
Ironically, Haushofer’s Indo-Pacific
strategy stemmed from his view of
a political resurrection of Asian
Figure 1. Geography of the Indo-Pacific people against Euro-American
(Source: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace)
domination 3 as seen in his inter-
At t h e 2 0 2 3 M u n i c h Indeed, recent years have seen war vision of an Indo-Pacific
Security Conference, Germany’s the idea of an Indo-Pacific region coalition, headed by Japan, India,
Fo re i g n M i n i s t e r A n n a l e n a evolve from a niche geopolitical and China, against the maritime
Baerbock described the Indo- concept linked to Japan and the colonial powers of Western
Pacific as a region that will decide US, into an apt description of a Europe, the British Empire, and
what international order in the country’s strategic approach to the United States.4 Currently, the
21 st century would look like. She maritime Asia. Indo-Pacific is mostly tied to the
then added that the Philippines Quad regional grouping of the
is in an area where tensions Depending on how one US, Japan, Australia, and India;
might explode at any given views the Indo-Pacific, the an arrangement championed by
moment. While discussions about region does house several high- former Japanese Prime Minister
Ukraine dominated the "Davos tension and critical flashpoints 1: Shinzo Abe in 2007, echoing the
of Defense," Asian delegations the Korean Peninsula, Taiwan, natural alignment of the Pacific
pointed out how the security of Territorial Disputes in the East and the Indian Ocean as well
the Indo-Pacific and Europe are China Sea and South China Sea, as advocating for a “broader
inseparable, further noting that Tension with Iran, and Instability Asia” similarly espoused by
the concerns of Ukraine today in Afghanistan, among many Haushofer. 5 While the primary
may be (East) Asia’s tomorrow. others. It is also important to note difference between Haushofer and
that a significant number of these contemporary views on the Indo-
8 The Indo-Pacific: The Premiere Maritime Flashpoint of the Early 21st Century
Pacific lies in which states align geopolitical term outlining ways the need for unity and strength, the
with which version, both versions to contain it and led by a coalition bonding power of shared values,
outline a coalition against another it sees as an Asiatic attempt at and the imperative to be active in
due to conflicting ideologies of NATO. It must be noted though that defending a liberal international
what the Indo-Pacific should China has started to use the term order.
represent. Indo-Pacific 7 as a contemporary
concept to describe the region
On one hand, the US and its Going Beyond Great Power
in international engagements. As Competition: Of Extra-regional
alliance structure with Australia, the international system evolves Interests and ASEAN Relevancy
Japan, and the UK rally around the to accommodate the competing
concept of a Free and Open Indo- However, framing the Indo-
interests of nation-states, the
Pacific to highlight shared values Pacific conflict within the lens
prevailing question of China’s
and ideals of the strategic space. of the great power competition
integration into or revision of the
The Free and Open Indo-Pacific d y n a m i c ove r s i m p l i f i e s t h e
existing international structure
concept highlights the need to complexities of the interests
safeguard freedom of navigation is of utmost importance. This
revolving around this particular
in the open seas of the Pacific and question looms behind every
geopolitical concept. Much to
Indian Ocean, as well as promote, i nt e r n at i o n a l i n i t i at i ve t h at
China’s chagrin, the concept of the
s afe g u a rd , a n d s u st a i n t h e China puts forward, especially
Indo-Pacific has also invigorated
relevancy of current international because its neighbors are wary
extra-regional players, such as
maritime laws through promoting of its every move as China tries
France, the European Union (EU)
the defense of the concurrent to shift the international balance
collectively, and India to jumpstart
rules-based order. Updating its of policies and institutions in
their economic and political
hubs-and-spokes architecture, its favor. As opposed to China
influence within the region. Despite
Washington’s approach to the creating coalitions of its own, it has
being constantly linked to the US,
Indo-Pacific centers upon 2 key instead become a revanchist and
the EU’s Indo-Pacific strategy calls
principles: Collective capacity an irredentist power, constantly
for a Europe that is not reliant on
and Integrated deterrence. reminding itself of its responsibility
the US for its security concerns
to reclaim “lost” territories and
T h e a c t i o n p l a n fo r nor is economically dependent on
secure greater maritime space, as
collective capacity is anchored on the Chinese market.8
well as a revisionist power looking
5 arrangements: Empower ASEAN, to undo established international
Support India’s Rise, Strengthen Such a notion is also
norms. being promoted individually by
the Quad as a premier regional
grouping, Improve the Japan- European powers like France, who
The challenge of has been proactive in becoming a
Republic of Korea dynamic, and
revisionism is especially more visible force in the region to
Re-establish its partnerships with
highlighted in the Indo-Pacific highlight its relevancy as a maritime
the Pacific Islands. Meanwhile,
through China’s approach in Pacific power. While India’s Indo-
integrated deterrence is described
by the US as the “concept which the South China Sea and the Pacific engagements have been
will inform almost everything that East China Sea, where it applies seen through Quad, New Delhi’s
we do,”6 this particular concept will select interpretation of the approach is still primarily centered
be particularly dependent on the UNCLOS alongside inconsistent on maintaining an image of strategic
integrity of Washington’s alliance applicability and extra-territorial autonomy. To note, France and India
structure, or its ability to execute enforcement of its jurisdiction. are historically strong proponents
its collective capacity approach. While the US has never taken of being fundamentally non-aligned
sides in the territorial disputes, it and maintaining a strong degree
On the other side of the has led a coalition to challenge of independence to act on foreign
spectrum lies China , which China’s revisionist approach both and defense issues. Interestingly,
initially saw the Indo-Pacific as a through patrols, with emphasis on
The Indo-Pacific: The Premiere Maritime Flashpoint of the Early 21st Century 9
STRATJOURNAL Office of Naval Strategic Studies
Volume 4 CY 2023 and Strategy Management
“
Stands as his Indo-Pacific Legacy”. The
However, framing the Indo-Pacific conflict within Interpreter. The Lowly Institute, July 26,
2022. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-
the lens of the great power competition dynamic interpreter/abe-shinzo-quad-stands-his-
oversimplifies the complexities of the interests indo-pacific-legacy
6
Ibid
revolving around this particular geopolitical concept. 7
Saran, Shyam. “How China Views Indo-
Pacific”. The Tribune India, Dec 18, 2019.
https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/
Pacific and the Indian Ocean, neutered bystander in its own comment/how-china-views-indo-
and how ASEAN must uphold its pacific-13470
maritime theater. 8
Duggal, Mahima. “The China Factor in
centrality as a key proponent to France’s Indo-Pacific Strategy.” Journal of
promote cooperation. This is also While it can be argued that Indo-Pacific Affairs. Air Press University, July
bolstered by how Indo-Pacific 13, 2022. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/
the Indo-Pacific’s evolution into an JIPA/Display/Article/3091134/the-china-
strategies highlight the importance actual theater is ultimately fueled factor-in-frances-indo-pacific-strategy/
of ASEAN and its existing regional by the US-China competition,11 it 9
Prakash, Anita. “What Kind of Indo-Pacific?
structures and ASEAN Centrality. cannot be denied that the growing It is for ASEAN to Ensure.” Economic
To note, ASEAN’s centrality in Research Institute for ASEAN and East
involvement of many players and Asia Affairs, September 04, 2023. ttps://
the Indo-Pacific requires greater their respective interests create a www.eria.org/news-and-views/what-kind-
examination, given that the whole new dynamic in the region.12 of-indo-pacific-it-is-for-asean-to-ensure/
Indo-Pacific architecture is a 10
Laksmana, Evan. “Autonomy, Access, and
From collective deterrence, Agility: Southeast Asia and the (Re)search
balancing act of economic and strategic autonomy, ASEAN for Regional Order”. PowerPoint presented
strategic interests in the region, Centrality, and China’s own vision; at the Maritime Security Symposium at the
with an emphasis on consensus, the abundance of these Indo- Luxent Hotel, Quezon City, May 11, 2022
inclusiveness, governance,
11
“Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific • Stimson
Pacific concepts forms another Center,” Stimson Center (blog), accessed
transparency, and sustainable layer of tense competition in a February 13, 2023, https://www.stimson.
growth.9 region already rife with multiple org/project/geopolitics-of-the-indo-
flashpoints. As Singapore’s pacific/.
There are concerns
12
Rory Medcalf, “Many Players, Many
Defense Minister Ng Eng Hen said Layers: The Indo-Pacific Long Game,” in
about ASEAN’s actual capacity at the Munich Security Conference: Asian Geopolitics and the US–China Rivalry
to strongly influence the Indo- "We are not in a comfortable place. (Routledge, 2021).
Pa c i f i c’s c o m p l ex s e c u r i t y The temperature is not boiling, but
environment given its strong certainly rising. We must do all we
can to cool it."
10 The Indo-Pacific: The Premiere Maritime Flashpoint of the Early 21st Century
ASEAN and the Philippines on
Australia’s Strategic Partnership:
Issues and Implications
Jan Emil Langomez
Figure 1. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Long during an ASEAN
Summit in 2018 (Source: Reuters)
Figure 2. ASEAN Leaders with Prime Minister Anthony Albenese MP, the current Prime Minister of Australia
since 2022, pose for a shot during the 3rd ASEAN-Australia Summit held on 07 September 2023 in Jakarta,
Indonesia.(Source: ASEAN.org)
dealing with security challenges, Support Programme, and the that while Australia seeks a
particularly on counterterrorism Regional Comprehensive closer diplomatic relationship
and trafficking. The CSP also further Economic Partnership. Third, with ASEAN , it continuously
reiterates the Treaty of Amity and the CSP strengthens Australia’s emphasizes its policy stance on
Cooperation between Australia multilateral diplomacy with active sensitive issues, particularly on
and ASEAN, which underscores role in ASEAN-centric forums human rights and engagement
the Australian Government’s “strong such as the ASEAN Regional w i t h C h i n a . Fo r i n st a n c e ,
commitment to promoting ASEAN Forum and the East Asia Summit Au stra l i a h a s c o nti n u o u s l y
member states. Australia’s regional e l e v a t e s S o u t h e a s t A s i a’s aired its growing concern about
peace and security”.5 Second, the diplomatic influence both in the human rights cases in Myanmar’s
CSP reinforces Australia’s trade Indo-Pacific and in the wider world. Rohingya population. 6 It has also
agreements and investments with continuously supported the 2016
ASEAN to contribute to the region’s A u s t r a l i a ’s fo c u s o n Arbitration Award won by the
economic growth and development. ASEAN is further rooted in its Philippines, which many ASEAN
This includes commitments to shared interests and values countries have remained lukewarm
maintaining essential trade and with Southeast Asian countries. in its recognition. Meanwhile, the
economic agreements such as the These shared values are rooted ASEAN consensus, which allows a
in promoting regional security, single Southeast Asian country to
ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand
economic development, and veto key decisions, has not always
Free Trade Area (AANZFTA), the
further political collaboration. been in sync with Australia’s
AANZFTA Economic Cooperation
However, it is important to note interests in the region. Hence,
12 ASEAN and the Philippines on Australia’s Strategic Partnership: Issues and Implications
Australia’s strong focus on human
rights and the need to recognize
the 2016 Arbitration Award
has impacted the Philippines, a
founding ASEAN member, in many
ways.
Implications for the Philippines
ASEAN and the Philippines on Australia’s Strategic Partnership: Issues and Implications 13
STRATJOURNAL Office of Naval Strategic Studies
Volume 4 CY 2023 and Strategy Management
2
“ASEAN and Australia,” Australian Government
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade,
“
accessed October 6, 2023, https://www.dfat.
Australia’s enhanced relations with the gov.au/geo/southeast-asia/asean-and-australia.
3
The Australian Government’s Department
Philippines and cooperation in the maritime of Foreign Affairs and Trade recognizes that
“Southeast Asia is the nexus of major power
field have been integral in supporting competition in the Indo-Pacific”; “ASEAN and
the nation’s push to build up its defense Australia”. 4 See Australia’s Defence Strategy;
“2016 Defence White Paper”, p. 17.
capabilities and promote the rule of law in “Overview of ASEAN-Australia Comprehensive
5
14 ASEAN and the Philippines on Australia’s Strategic Partnership: Issues and Implications
The Importance of the US-Philippines th e N ew B ilate ral D efe nse
Guidelines which emphasizes
Alliance in the Region: The Philippines the US’ willingness to respond to
grey zone activities, re-opening 9
as a Lynchpin to the US Indo-Pacific more bases under the Enhanced
Strategy in ASEAN Defense Cooperation Agreement
Kyle Cardona (EDCA), and taking away the
decades-old ambiguity of the MDT
It is important to remember (GWOT) after the 9/11 attacks. It was by reaffirming the US’ ironclad
that the US is the Philippines’ only after the 2012 Scarborough commitment to the Philippines
oldest ally in the Indo-Pacific. Shoal takeover that the Philippine in the event of an armed attack.
T h e ex i s t e n c e o f t h e U S - government genuinely considered Current US President Joe Biden’s
Philippines’ Mutual Defens e recalibrating and identifying what reaffirmation, in particular, came
Treaty itself has spanned more should be prioritized as a threat to right after a Chinese Coast Guard
than seven decades, and the national security. 2 vessel collided with a Filipino
relations between the countries supply boat en route to Ayungin
span longer given the Philippines’ While former President Shoal this year. 4
previous status as an American B e n i g n o S . Aq u i n o I I I ’s The US Indo-Pacific Strategy and
colony. However, the alliance had administration was able to make Current Defense Infrastructure
to transform over time. When the strides on that front with the filing It is important to note that
Berlin Wall fell and the Cold War of the Arbitration Case against the Indo-Pacific only started to
ended, the strategic raison d’etre China in The Hague, reactive it may occupy a central role in the US
be, this was severely undermined national strategy when China
of the US-Philippine security
began to rise as an emerging
pact fell as well; with both sides and pushed to the backburner power in the Asia-Pacific, and
concluding that while the alliance after former President Rodrigo the growing strategic importance
was good to have, it was no longer R. Duterte was elected. From of the two connecting theaters
of vital importance.1 2016 to 2022, the US-Philippines of the continent, the Indian and
security pact almost disintegrated the Pacific Oceans , became
In 1991, the Philippine with President Duterte’s repeated increasingly apparent. As
Senate rejected the renewal of the attacks on the alliance. He stopped China started to unilaterally
1947 Military Bases Agreement most major joint exercises , change the status quo in the
resulting in the withdrawal of the threatened to end the Visiting region , militarizing the SC S
and conducting activities in
American forces. This too swift of Forces Agreement (VFA), and
contested territories that violate
a downgrade proved to be a folly warmed up to China, despite the international conventions, laws,
on both ends as only three years latter having conducted harmful and norms, the US started to lean
later, China illegally occupied advances in the West Philippine away from its previous GWOT
Mischief Reef, an underwater Sea (WPS). 3 alignment and re-prioritize its
feature located in the Philippines’ core interests, thus making the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ); The change of strategic and political decision to
and is now one of the most a d m i n i st r at i o n , n ow u n d e r ‘pivot to Asia.’ The alarming need
militarized islands in the South President Ferdinand Marcos to keep the region open and free
has been the basis of the U.S. and
China Sea (SCS). Despite this Jr., came with the expected re-
most of the West’s Indo-Pacific
incident, the alliance between the invigoration of the US-Philippines strategies. To balance China’s
US and the Philippines became alliance. Within a year, the US expanding force projection in
fixated on counterterrorism and and the Philippines were able to the Asia- Pacific, and actively
counterinsurgency missions in rebuild confidence with each other promote an open and free Indo-
Mindanao, which was aligned and make strides in the alliance. Pacific via freedom of navigation
with the US global war on terrorism This was done by by releasing
The Importance of the US-Philippines Alliance in the Region: The Philippines as a Lynchpin to the
15
STRATJOURNAL Office of Naval Strategic Studies
Volume 4 CY 2023 and Strategy Management
The Importance of the US-Philippines Alliance in the Region: The Philippines as a Lynchpin to the
16 US Indo-Pacific Strategy in ASEAN
between Chinese and Vietnamese This is where the US-Philippines It is then safe to presume
forces at the Spratly Islands, which alliance comes in, as well as that any actions or activities
resulted in fatalities. Ending up the US’ overarching defense that could harm the WPS and
with a Code that does not address infrastructure. Without any security by extension the SCS (e.g.,
China’s aggression in the past up arrangement from ASEAN’s end, incursions of Chinese vessels,
to the present, and has no teeth at the US network of alliances and harassment of Filipino fishers and
all7 when it comes to dealing with the Philippines being its lynchpin government vessels, swarming of
the illegal and damaging activities in Southeast Asia could work well island features in the WPS, illegal
China has done in the SCS, leaves at the moment and even in the unreported, and unregulated
ASEAN with the short end of the long run for ASEAN. Unlike most fishing of Chinese maritime militia,
stick. ASEAN member countries, the indiscriminate harvesting of corals
Other factors that make Philippines has a lot at stake in the and other raw materials, and
ASEAN ineffective when it comes SCS. illegal island reclamations) would
“
also negatively affect not just the
Without any security arrangement from the Philippines’ fishing industry and
emerging blue economy but the
ASEAN’s end, the US network of alliances and overall livelihood of its coastal
the Philippines being its lynchpin in Southeast communities.
Asia the heart of the Indo-Pacific could work
Beyond that, these activities
well at the moment and even in the long run for would cause massive destruction
ASEAN. Unlike most ASEAN member countries, to the marine environment of these
the Philippines has a lot at stake in the SCS. waters, thereby contributing to
habitat destruction and the rapid
decline of fish stocks on a global
to dealing with the SCS territorial scale. It is not surprising then that
and maritime disputes are (1) Eight y percent of the the Philippines is more willing to
ASEAN’s foundational principle of country’s 117 million population live collaborate with the US to balance
non-interference in the domestic in coastal communities comprising China in the SCS and keep them
affairs of neighboring countries, 8 about 85 percent of Filipino in check in terms of their harmful
which in realit y extends to fisherfolks who are dependent on activities in the shared waters of
international affairs; (2) ASEAN these waters for food and income the region. Fortunately, the US
member states tendency to security. Moreover, 50 percent is more than willing to support
remain neutral over geopolitical of the Philippines’ fish stocks are the Philippines in this endeavor,
issues, prioritizing the economic caught by small-scale fishers. This by aiding the country in its
trade-offs that China provides amounts to an annual estimate modernization and through the
the region; and (3) China’s locked of 981 million US dollars. The implementation of EDCA.
grip on Cambodia , Myanmar, country also sits at the heart of the
How Can the Philippines and the
and Laos, all heavily dependent coral triangle, which is the global Philippine Navy Exploit this?
on China for economic trade center of marine biodiversity and
and water security with their accounts for 60 percent of the There are many ways for the
share of the Mekong River; thus, world’s known fish and more than Philippines, and by extension, the
i nfl u e n c i n g th e c o n s e n s u s - 300 hundred species of corals. Philippine Navy could exploit this
based decision -making of It is noteworthy as well that 9 rare advantage. But first, there is a
ASEAN and undermining the percent of the world’s coral reefs need for the Philippine government
organization’s course of action on are found in the Philippines 10 . to identify its interests and needs
high-stakes geopolitical issues. 9
The Importance of the US-Philippines Alliance in the Region: The Philippines as a Lynchpin to the
US Indo-Pacific Strategy in ASEAN 17
STRATJOURNAL Office of Naval Strategic Studies
Volume 4 CY 2023 and Strategy Management
The Importance of the US-Philippines Alliance in the Region: The Philippines as a Lynchpin to the
18 US Indo-Pacific Strategy in ASEAN
u n d e rst a n d i n g th e ex i sti n g
Should the Philippines Legislate challenges that the Philippines
continues to face in terms of policy
a National Marine Code? development and enforcement in
Jan Emil Langomez the maritime domain.
Legal Context of a Philippine
Maritime Policy
Since 1983, the World
Bank has recognized that the
convergence of multiple agencies
pursuing a similar mission and
operational mandate within
the Philippines. This signifies
organizational challenges resulting
in the inefficient allocation of
resources . 2 This issue has
persisted since 1976, leading
to the proliferation of agencies
involved in the management of the
country's maritime affairs, thereby
giving rise to intricate institutional
Figure 1. The Philippine Navy along with naval ships from the United States, Japan, and India arrangements characterized
conducted a patrol in the South China Sea in 2019
(Source: Philippine Daily Inquirer)
by a lack of clearly defined
horizontal relationships within
Maritime policy stands as Concurrently, the specter their respective legal mandates.
an enduring pillar underpinning of overlapping jurisdictions and
the Philippines' security and conflicting maritime legislation At present, there persists
develop mental pursuits . As continues to cast shadows over a significant challenge to fully
one of the world 's largest the Philippines' maritime policy in harmonize the existence of
archipelagos, the establishment addressing maritime security and overlapping functions among
of a robust framework of maritime- development challenges. Such these agencies, which often
“
related policies and laws is
indispensable in realizing the Concurrently, the specter of overlapping
nation's development objectives
and safeguarding its territorial jurisdictions and conflicting maritime legislation
integrity. Nonetheless, recent continues to cast shadows over the Philippines'
events have starkly underscored maritime policy in addressing maritime security
the imperative for a more holistic
a p p roac h to ma naging the and development challenges.
Philippines' expansive maritime
domain. The West Philippine Sea, challenges include the persistent
in particular, has become a focal results in unwarranted allegations
ove rl a p p i n g of o p e rati o n a l o f m a n d a te i n f r i n g e m e n t .
point for a spectrum of challenges, mandates and challenges for inter-
encompassing grey zone Fu r t h e r m o r e , i n te r- a g e n c y
agency collaboration.1 To address fragmentation has led to structural
operations and environmental these issues, there is an urgent and operational challenges to
degradation wrought by foreign need to discuss the Philippines' conduct operations which hinders
vessels, including overfishing, maritime legal framework which the promotion of cooperative
coral reef destruction, and marine underpins operational mandates
pollution. and strategies. This is key to
Should the Philippines Legislate a National Marine Code? 19
STRATJOURNAL Office of Naval Strategic Studies
Volume 4 CY 2023 and Strategy Management
Figure 1. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos [R] shakes hands with Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida [L] (Source:
Presidential Communications Office)
Figure 2. JS Izumo docked in Manila for a Goodwill visit last August 2023
(Source: Philippine News Agency)
Figure 3. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivering a policy speech at the Joint Session of the Philippine Senate and
the House of Representatives during his official visit to the Philippines on November 2023.
(Source: Prime Minister's Office of Japan)
harnessed bilaterally between growing relations between the awareness (MDA) capabilities.
the US and the Philippines as Philippines and Japan given the
Both leaders have also
well as the US and Japan over the outcome of his trip to Manila.
agreed to start negotiations for
past years. Lastly, both countries A p a r t f ro m b e i n g t h e f i r st
a reciprocal access agreement
share fundamental principles Japanese leader to address the
(RAA) between Japan and the
and values including freedom, Philippine Congress; substantive
Philippines. Accordingly, RAAs
democracy, respect for human discussions and agreements
serve as a legal framework for
were signed during his visit. In
rights, the rule of law, and dignity.9 foreign armed forces with a
These factors make cooperation terms of defense and security,
specific set of procedures and
easier to facilitate between the the Japanese government
guidelines for training and joint
Philippines and Japan. will be granting aid to the exercises.11 An RAA between
Philippines worth JPY600 million both countries will boost
Transformative and Forward- (approximately Php235,500,000)
Looking: Reaffirming ‘Golden interoperability between the
Ties’ for a coastal radar system 10 Philippines and Japan’s military
through its Official Security forces and may serve as a “legal
The official visit of Prime Assistance (OSA) program that
Minister Kishida to the Philippines will contribute to strengthening b a s i s fo r J a p a n’s p ote nt i a l
is an added testament to the the Philippine Navy’s coastal participation in Philippine-US
military exercises.” 12 If pushed
surveillance and maritime domain through, this will be Japan’s first
STRATJOURNAL
EDITORIAL BOARD
CAPT WILLESTER S ROBLES PN(GSC) CALL FOR PAPERS FOR SJ CY 2024
Director, Office of Naval Strategic Studies and
Strategy Management The StratJourn is a quarterly publication by the Office
of Naval Strategic Studies and Strategy Management
CDR ERROL N DELA CRUZ PN (ONSSSM), Philippine Navy that is devoted to
Deputy Director, Office of Naval Strategic Studies strategic, national, regional, and international issues
and Strategy Management and developments that significantly impact maritime
security and naval defense.
MAJ VLADIMIR D CABRERA PN(M)
Chief, Strategy and Policy Branch Currently, the editorial board welcomes the authors’
submission of papers StratJourn CY 2024. Interested
LT MIKE ANTHONY P MOGOL PN parties, may reach out to the editorial board for further
Chief, International Defense and Security Engagement details (e.g., appropriate format and topics covered)
Branch and Revolution in Military Affairs Branch through the email address:
[email protected]
LT VANESSA KATRINA J TULANG PN
Chief, Strategy Management Branch
Editorial Assistants
26