Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: Core Curriculum 2023
Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: Core Curriculum 2023
Additional Reading
➢ McLeod BC. Therapeutic apheresis: history,
AJKD Vol 81 | Iss 4 | April 2023 1
Transfusion. clinical trials have largely used
2010;50(7):1413- centrifugation, the specific modality used
1426. https:// often varies by country. Most TPE sessions in
doi.org/10.1111/ the United States are centrifugation-based.
j.1537-
2995.2009.0250 Centrifugation FEATURE EDITOR
5. Melanie Hoenig
The centrifuge is the functional unit of this
continuous-flow extracorporeal circuit and ADVISORY BOARD
Technique does not require a blood-membrane interface. By Ursula C.
spinning at 2,000-2,500 revolutions per minute, Brewster
Two technologies it separates the components of anticoagulated Michael J. Choi
are available for the Biff F. Palmer
removal of plasma Bessie Young
and its pathogenic
substance(s): The Core
Curriculum aims to
centrifugation and
give trainees in
membrane nephrology a
filtration. strong knowledge
Membrane base in core topics
filtration TPE can in the specialty
only separate by providing an
over- view of the
plasma, whereas topic and citing
centrifugation TPE key references,
can frac- tionate any including the
of the blood
components (eg,
erythrocytes,
platelets, plasma).
As such,
centrifugation TPE
is the apheresis
modality employed
when specific blood
fractions are
targeted. Both
methods are
similarly effective at
removing plasma
proteins, and each
in- volves
administration of
replacement fluid at
an equal or greater
volume to what
was removed. As
shown in Table 2,
however,
membrane
filtration TPE
extracts a smaller
fraction of plasma
(30%) per unit of
time than
centrifugal systems
(80%), requiring
longer treatment
times and higher
blood flow rates.
This can increase
the risk for circuit
clotting. Although
Figure 1. Comparison of centrifugation and membrane separation therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). In centrifugation TPE, blood is re
filtration upon return to the patient. Figure created with Biorender.com.
➢ Gashti CN. Membrane-based therapeutic plasma ex- Its use should be most strongly considered in those
change: a new frontier for nephrologists. Semin Dial. conditions for which there is evidence to support clinical
2016;29(5):382-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/ benefit. Table 3 describes common plasma proteins and
sdi.12506 +ESSENTIAL READING their characteristics.
➢ Kes P, Janssens ME, Baˇsi´c-Juki´c N, Kljak M. A
ran- domized crossover study comparing membrane Vascular Access
and centrifugal therapeutic plasma exchange Most apheresis devices use centrifugation and require
procedures. Transfusion. 2016;56(12):3065-3072. blood flow rates of 50-120 mL/min, compared with 150-
https://doi.org/1 0.1111/trf.13850 200 mL/min in membrane filtration TPE (Table 2). The
➢ Ahmed S, Kaplan A. Therapeutic plasma exchange us- TPE procedure can be continuous, which requires access
ing membrane plasma separation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. and return catheters, or discontinuous, which allows a
2020;15(9):1364-1370. https://doi.org/10.2215/ single catheter to serve for access and return. A discon-
CJN.12501019 +ESSENTIAL READING tinuous setup requires longer procedure times.
Procedure-related factors (urgency, volume[s]
exchanged, frequency), patient-related factors (underlying
Basic Principles and General Considerations disease, mental status, and vascular anatomy), and insti-
tutional capabilities determine the ideal vascular access.
When to Consider TPE
Options include the following.
TPE is most commonly used to target a single
pathogenic substance for removal from the plasma. The Large-Bore Peripheral Intravenous Access
ideal char- acteristics of such substances include large In adults, 17-19–gauge needles are used; these are used to
molecular weight (>15,000 Da), slow rate of formation, supply blood flow rates ranging from >80 to 60 mL/min.
prolonged half-life, higher-percentage intravascular In children, 19-22–gauge needles are used. Routinely,
distribution, and low turnover rate. Nevertheless, within blood is withdrawn from the basilic or cephalic vein and
specific dis- eases, TPE has not always demonstrated returned with replacement fluid to smaller veins in the
clinical benefit. hands.
Central Venous Catheters for Dialysis the method of apheresis, comorbid processes (eg,
In adults, 11.5-F catheters provide consistent and reliable cirrhosis, kidney failure, or thrombocytopenia), and the
blood flow rates and are usually placed into the internal need for systemic anticoagulation for other indications
jugular or femoral veins. (eg, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]).
There are 2 standard anticoagulant agents used to maintain
Ports the patency of the circuit, citrate and heparin.
Ports are subcutaneous chambers with a distal tip that
terminates at the junction of the right atrium and the Citrate
su- perior vena cava. Often, a single-lumen 9-F port is used Citrate is the preferred agent because of its regional effect,
for access (ie, blood draw) with blood and replacement short half-life (30-60 min), and excellent safety profile.
fluid return via peripheral intravenous (IV) access. Dual- Citrate is infused in the circuit before the pump, where it
lumen ports typically have flow rates similar to large- chelates ionized calcium to prevent activation of the coag-
bore pe- ripheral IV accesses. Ports are associated with low ulation cascade. In centrifugation TPE, the risk of citrate
infection rates and provide greater patient comfort. For toxicity is low because 80% is removed with the
central venous catheters (CVC) and port patency, heparin discarded plasma. Membrane filtration TPE, however,
locks at 1,000 U/mL are often used. requires higher blood flow rates and clears only 20%-30%
of the citrate. This increases the risk for citrate toxicity,
Arteriovenous Fistulas or Grafts particularly in patients with liver or kidney disease, and
Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or arteriovenous grafts heparin is preferred with this modality. Calcium must be
(AVGs) are excellent choices for patients undergoing replaced orally or IV to avoid systemic hypocalcemia.
ongoing, repetitive TPE because these accesses provide fast The most commonly used commercial citrate solutions are
blood flow, low risk of infection, and excellent long-term Anticoag- ulant Citrate Dextrose Formula A (ACD-A),
patency. This is the access of choice particularly for he- which is a hy- pertonic solution (sodium concentration of
modialysis recipients who need TPE. AVFs are used in only 252 mmol/L), and ACD-B, which is isotonic to plasma.
2%-4% of apheresis procedures. Given the time needed for Whole blood to anticoagulant ratios of 10:1-14:1
creation and maturation, they are not suitable for patients (expressed in milliliters) are commonly used. The ratio may
requiring urgent or short courses of therapy. be adjusted to deliver more anticoagulant agent if
platelet clumping occurs, while monitoring for increased
Additional Readings citrate reactions.
➢ Ipe TS, Marques MB. Vascular access for therapeutic
plasma exchange. Transfusion. 2018;58(suppl 1):580- Heparin
589. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14479 Heparin is inexpensive, has a short half-life (23 minutes to
➢ Barth D, Sanchez A, Thomsen AM, et al. Peripheral 2.48 hours), and is almost entirely cleared during TPE. A
vascular access for therapeutic plasma exchange: a practical bolus of 3,000-5,000 U is administered at the start of
approach to increased utilization and selecting the most treatment, followed by 1,000 U/h if needed. Heparin is the
appropriate vascular access. J Clin Apher. 2020;35(3):178- preferred anticoagulant agent in membrane filtration TPE,
187. https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21778 and the clot- ting risk is low enough that initial treatment
without anti- coagulation can be considered with modern
Anticoagulation equipment.
Anticoagulation is used to prevent clotting in the extra- There is considerable institutional variability in the
corporeal circuit. The specific anticoagulant depends on management of patients already receiving anticoagulation.
For patients receiving a heparin drip and undergoing
centrifugation TPE, one approach is to discontinue the
1 hour before TPE with citrate infusion. Treatment of pa- combination can be
tients currently receiving warfarin, low-molecular-weight
heparin, or direct oral anticoagulant agents may be chal-
lenging because of longer drug half-lives, less availability
of reversal agents, and reduced ability to easily monitor
the bleeding risk. TPE with albumin replacement is safe
to perform in individuals receiving warfarin, although
albu- min replacement increases the anticoagulant effect
through removal of clotting factors. At many institutions,
TPE is performed in the standard fashion with citrate or
heparin in patients receiving preexisting anticoagulation.
Finally, in patients with small blood volumes (eg, pe-
diatric patients), many centers use a combination of
ACD-A and heparin (eg, 500 mL ACD-A with 10,000 U
heparin) to minimize the amount of citrate, although a
whole blood to anticoagulant ratio of at least 26:1 is
used.
Additional Readings
➢ Lee G, Arepally GM. Anticoagulation techniques in
apheresis: from heparin to citrate and beyond. J Clin
Apher. 2012;27(3):117-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/
jca.21222 +ESSENTIAL READING
➢ Zantek ND, Morgan S, Zantek PF, Mair DC, Bowman
RJ, Aysola A. Effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on
coagulation parameters in patients on warfarin. J Clin
Apher. 2014;29(2):75-82.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21294
➢ Daugirdas JT, Blake PG, Ing TS. Handbook of Dialysis, 5th
ed. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.
➢ Kaplan A, Raut P, Totoe G, Morgan S, Zantek ND.
Management of systemic unfractionated heparin anti-
coagulation during therapeutic plasma exchange. J Clin
Apher. 2016;31(6):507-515. https://doi.org/10.1
002/jca.21441
➢ Shunkwiler SM, Pham HP, Wool G, et al. The man-
agement of anticoagulation in patients undergoing
therapeutic plasma exchange: a concise review. J Clin
Apher. 2018;33(3):371-379. https://doi.org/10.1
002/jca.21592 +ESSENTIAL READING
Replacement Fluids
The choice of replacement fluid depends on the indication
for apheresis, as well as infection and bleeding risks.
Replacement fluids consist of colloids, crystalloids, or a
combination of the 2, although crystalloids are typically
only used for hyperviscosity syndrome. Human albumin
solution is used most frequently for its oncotic properties.
Albumin
Commercially available 5% albumin solutions contain
approximately 145 mmol/L sodium and <2 mmol/L po-
tassium. TPE followed by albumin replacement will
result in a 50%-60% reduction in pro- and anticoagulant
factors. Fortunately, rebound is biphasic, with an initial
increase 4 hours after pheresis and almost complete
recovery by 48 hours. Coagulation testing should not be
performed for 8- 12 hours after albumin replacement. If
cost is a limitation, an 80:20 albumin–saline solution
Prescribing Principles
Case 1: A 50-kg, 42-year-old woman presents with fatigue
and headache of 2 weeks’ duration. In the emergency
department, she is ill-appearing with heart rate of 115
beats/ min and blood pressure 120/65 mm Hg. She has a
petechial rash. Laboratory results include hematocrit
level of 18%,
platelet count of 12 × 103/μL, serum creatinine (Scr) level of
1.3 mg/dL (from a baseline of 0.8 mg/dL), lactate dehydro-
genase level of 2,100 U/mL, and haptoglobin level of <6 mg/
dL. A peripheral blood smear shows 15% schistocytes.
0.9
% of initial
0.4
(d) 0.9% saline solution 0.3
For the answers to these questions, see the following text. 0.2
0.1
0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0
Writing the Prescription Ve/EPV
40 https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21257
➢ Neyrinck MM, Vrielink H, Joint Task Force for Education
and Certification. Calculations in apheresis. J Clin Apher.
20
2015;30(1):38-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21347
+ESSENTIAL READING
0 ➢ ABIM Foundation. American Society for Apheresis.
0 1 2 3 4 5
Day Choosing Wisely | Promoting conversations between
providers and patients. Published April 23, 2018.
Figure 3. Immunoglobulin G removal from 1 plasma volume exchangedAccessed
per dayOctober 7, 2022.
for 3 days. The https://www.choosingwisely.
intertreatment increase is a result of equ
org/societies/american-society-for-apheresis/
➢ Zantek ND, Pagano MB, Rollins-Raval MA, et al. He-
mostasis testing and therapeutic plasma exchange: re-
sults of a practice survey. J Clin Apher. 2019;34(1):26-
32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21666
➢ Staley EM, Hoang ST, Liu H, Pham HP. A brief review
of common mathematical calculations in therapeutic
apheresis. J Clin Apher. 2019;34(5):607-612. https://
doi.org/10.1002/jca.21712 +ESSENTIAL READING
(daily TPE initially) with 1-1.5 plasma volume exchanges.
For question 3, option (a), frozen plasma, is the best
answer. Daily sessions with frozen plasma replacement Indications
Case 2: A 70-year-old man presents with fatigue, dyspnea,
fluid are life- saving, as TPE removes autoantibodies against and hemoptysis. He appears ill, with tachycardia and blood
ADAMTS13 and frozen plasma provides functional pressure 84/55 mm Hg. He is intubated for hypoxemic res-
ADAMTS13. piratory failure. Laboratory testing reveals a hemoglobin
level of 8 g/dL, platelet count of 76 × 103/μL, and Scr
Laboratory Monitoring concen- tration of 3.2 mg/dL (from a baseline of 1.2 mg/dL).
Optimal laboratory testing for hemostasis in patients un- Urinal- ysis reveals microscopic hematuria with 10 %
dergoing TPE is not defined, and there is significant acanthocytes on microscopy. Computed tomography of
practice variation across institutions. The American Society the chest is compatible with DAH. Empirical corticosteroids
for Apheresis (ASFA) and Choosing Wisely do not are initiated, and, based on preliminary results of a
kidney biopsy consistent with anti-GBM disease,
recommend routine monitoring of coagulation tests dur-
cyclophosphamide and TPE are started. Serum antibodies
ing a course of TPE unless the procedure is performed
to myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3 (MPO and PR3) are
daily. This includes TPE performed with nonfrozen plasma not detected, and serum anti-GBM antibody is 52 U (
replacement fluids such as albumin. Red blood cell trans- normal is <1 U).
fusion should be considered to maintain hematocrit
level >22%, and ionized calcium should be measured if
symptoms of hypocalcemia develop. The effect at 48 hours Table 4. Effect of a Single Plasma Volume Exchange on the
of 1 plasma volume exchange on different proteins is Removal and Rebound of Common Blood Constituents Using
shown in Table 4. Albumin and/or Crystalloid Replacement Fluid
Additional important treatment recommendations from DecreaseRebound 48
Choosing Wisely include not placing a central venous Constituent vs Baseline, %h Post Apheresis, %
catheter if peripheral vein access is safe, using frozen Antithrombin III 70 100
plasma replacement fluid only when clearly indicated, and C3 63 60-100
establishing a defined course of apheresis. Factor VIII 50-82 90-100
Fibrinogen 67 46-63
Additional Readings Prothrombin 49 48
➢ Wood L, Jacobs P. The effect of serial therapeutic Immunoglobulins 60 44
plasmapheresis on platelet count, coagulation factors, Liver enzymes 55-60 100
plasma immunoglobulin, and complement levels. J Clin Platelets 25-30 75-100
Values are given as means.
Apher. 1986;3(2):124-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/
jca.2920030209
Table 5 (Cont'd). ASFA Category and Grade Recommendations for Therapeutic Apheresis
Disease Modality Indication Category Grade
Sepsis with multiorgan failure TPE – III 2B
Sickle cell disease, acute RBC exchange Acute stroke I 1C
RBC exchange Acute chest syndrome, severe II 1C
RBC exchange Other complications III 2C
Sickle cell disease, nonacute RBC exchange Stroke prophylaxis I 1A
RBC exchange Pregnancy II 2B
RBC exchange Recurrent vaso-occlusive pain crisis II 2B
RBC exchange Preoperative management III 2A
Steroid-responsive encephalopathy TPE – II 2C
associated with autoimmune
thyroiditis (Hashimoto
encephalopathy)
Stiff-person syndrome TPE – III 2C
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss LA/rheopheresis/TPE – III 2A
SLE TPE Severe complications II 2C
Thrombocytosis Thrombocytapheresis Symptomatic II 2C
Thrombocytapheresis Prophylactic or secondary III 2C
TMA, coagulation mediated TPE THBD, DGKE, and PLG gene III 2C
variants
TMA, complement mediated TPE CFH autoantibody I 2C
TPE Complement factor gene variants III 2C
TMA, drug associated TPE Ticlopidine I 2B
TPE Clopidogrel III 2B
TPE Gemcitabine/quinine IV 2C
TMA, infection associated TPE/IA STEC-HUS, severe III 2C
TPE Pediatric HUS III 2C
TMA, TTP TPE – I 1A
TMA, transplant associated TPE – III 2C
Thyroid storm TPE – II 2C
Toxic epidermal necrolysis TPE Refractory III 2B
Transplant, cardiac ECP Cellular/recurrent rejection II 1B
ECP Rejection prophylaxis II 2A
TPE Desensitization II 1C
TPE Antibody-mediated rejection III 2C
Transplant, HSCT, ABOi TPE Major ABOi HPC(M) II 1B
TPE Major ABOi HPC(A) II 2B
RBC exchange Minor ABOi HPC(A) III 2C
TPE Major/minor ABOi with pure RBC III 2C
aplasia
Transplant, HSCT, TPE – III 2C
HLA desensitization
Transplant, liver TPE Desensitization, ABOi living donor I 1C
TPE Desensitization, ABOi deceased III 2C
donor/AMR
ECP Desensitization, ABOi III 2C
ECP Acute rejection/immune suppression III 2B
withdrawal
Transplant, lung ECP Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome II 1C
TPE AMR/desensitization III 2C
Transplant, kidney, ABO compatible TPE/IA AMR I 1B
TPE/IA Desensitization, living donor I 1B
TPE/IA Desensitization, deceased donor III 2C
Transplant, kidney, ABOi TPE/IA Desensitization, living donor I 1B
TPE/IA AMR II 1B
(Continued)
Question 4: Which one of the following best describes the Additional Readings
duration of TPE for this patient? ➢ Pham HP, Staley EM, Schwartz J. Therapeutic plasma
(a) Because MPO and PR3 testing gives negative results, exchange-a brief review of indications, urgency,
TPE should be discontinued
schedule, and technical aspects. Transfus Apher Sci.
(b) TPE should be discontinued when serum anti-GBM
antibody is undetectable
2019;58(3):237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
(c) TPE should be continued for a minimum of 3 sessions transci.2019.04.006
(d) TPE should be continued for a minimum of 10-20 ➢ Padmanabhan A, Connelly-Smith L, Aqui N, et al.
days and until resolution of active organ injury Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clin-
ical practice-evidence-based approach from the Writing
For the answer to this question, see the following text. Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the
eighth special issue. J Clin Apher. 2019;34(3):171-354.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21705 +ESSENTIAL READING
➢ Sanchez AP, Balogun RA. Therapeutic plasma exchange
General Recommendations for TPE in the critically ill patient: technology and indications.
ASFA categorizes and grades 84 diseases and 157 in- Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2021;28(1):59-73. https://doi.
dications for therapeutic apheresis. In category I, apheresis org/10.1053/j.ackd.2021.03.005
is first-line therapy. For category II, apheresis is second-
line therapy with efficacy favored by available evidence
but conventional therapy should be tried first. For category Nephrology-Specific Indications for TPE Autoantibodies
III, the role of apheresis has not been established, so the are frequently associated with primary kidney diseases
decision needs to be individualized. In category IV, the and are ideal candidates for TPE. Nevertheless, few
evidence suggests that apheresis is ineffective or harmful. kidney diseases have evidence to support the use of
In terms of ASFA grading, grade 1 is a strong recom- TPE, and, in the 2021 KDIGO glomerular diseases
mendation, whereas grade 2 is weak. Quality of evidence is guideline, the only recommenda- tion for TPE is for
indicated by the letters A, B, and C, which represent anti-GBM disease (KDIGO grade 1C). Other conditions
high- quality, moderate-quality, and low-quality in which TPE may be beneficial are presented as
evidence, respectively (Table 5). These guidelines are practice points. The category I renal in- dications
updated approximately every 3 years, with the most recent based on the ASFA guidelines are reviewed in the
version dated 2019. following sections.
Anti-GBM Disease brain, heart, and skin, although large vessels can also be
Anti-GBM disease (ie, Goodpasture syndrome) is an involved. Approximately 65% of episodes have a precipi-
autoimmune disorder in which IgG antibodies directed tating event.
against the α3 chain of type IV collagen result in glomer- The current ASFA recommendations are based on 5 case
ulonephritis and/or alveolar hemorrhage. Often a rapidly series involving 192 patients, and are as follows:
progressive glomerulonephritis, kidney failure develops in • Management: Anticoagulation, steroids, and TPE and/or
approximately 55% of patients despite treatment. IV immunoglobulin
A single randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 17 pa- • TPE prescription:
tients showed favorable kidney outcomes and improved ○ Plasma volume: 1-1.5 EPV
survival with TPE. In 2001, it was reported that patients
○ Frequency: Daily or every other day
receiving dialysis at presentation with 100% crescents on
○ Replacement fluid: Frozen plasma or frozen plasma/
biopsy did not experience recovery of kidney function.
albumin
In 2018, a retrospective analysis of 123 patients
○ Duration: Minimum of 3 to 5 sessions with longer-
confirmed these findings and further determined that
those with ≥50% global glomerulosclerosis had adverse term duration based on clinical response
kidney outcomes. Therefore, the KDIGO glomerular
diseases guideline recommends TPE except in patients who Additional Readings
require dialysis with (1) 100% crescents or (2) >50% ➢ Rodr´ıguez-Pinto´ I, Moitinho M, Santacreu I, et
global glomerulosclerosis and no pulmonary al. Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS):
hemorrhage. descriptive analysis of 500 patients from the Interna-
The current ASFA recommendations are as follows: tional CAPS Registry. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15(12):1120-
• Management: Therapy with corticosteroids, cyclophos- 1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2016.09.010
phamide, and TPE ➢ Legault K, Schunemann H, Hillis C, et al. McMaster
• TPE prescription: RARE- Best practices clinical practice guideline on
○ Plasma volume: 1-1.5 EPV diagnosis and management of the catastrophic
○ Frequency: Daily antiphospholipid syn- drome. J Thromb Haemost.
○ Replacement fluid: Albumin or frozen plasma if DAH is Published online June 7, 2018.
present https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14192
○ Duration: Minimum of 10-20 days and until
resolution of active glomerular and/or pulmonary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Following
injury; some providers continue until antibody Kidney Transplant
testing is negative, although the necessity of this
The etiology of this primary podocytopathy remains un-
approach has not been established with certainty; if
known, but a circulating factor has been postulated.
seronegative disease at presentation, minimum of 10-
Recently, anti-nephrin antibodies have been implicated in
20 days and until reso- lution of active organ injury
the pathogenesis and may represent a target of TPE in this
Returning to question 4, the best answer is (d), TPE disorder for some patients. After transplant, the risks of
should be continued for a minimum of 10-20 days and non-postadaptive recurrence of focal segmental glomer-
until resolution of active organ injury. ulosclerosis (FSGS) are generally 20%-50% in the first
allograft and 80%-100% in subsequent allografts. Despite
Additional Readings treatment, 30%-60% of patients experience progression to
➢ Levy JB, Turner AN, Rees AJ, Pusey CD. Long-term kidney failure within 3-7 years. FSGS may recur a few
outcome of anti-glomerular basement membrane anti- hours to 2 years after transplant.
body disease treated with plasma exchange and immu- The current ASFA recommendations, based on 50 case
nosuppression. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(11):1033- series involving 628 patients and 4 controlled trials, are as
1042. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-11- follows:
200106050-00009 +ESSENTIAL READING • Management: Steroids, rituximab, and TPE and/or IV
➢ van Daalen EE, Jennette JC, McAdoo SP, et al. Predicting immunoglobulin
outcome in patients with anti-GBM glomerulone- • TPE prescription:
phritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(1):63-72. ○ TPE, lipoprotein apheresis, or immunoadsorption with
https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04290417 regenerative adsorbers can be used; for TPE, plasma
volume of 1-1.5 EPV
○ Frequency: Daily or every other day
Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome
○ Replacement fluid: Albumin
Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is defined
○ Duration: Three daily TPEs followed by 6 more ses-
by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and mul-
sions in the following 2 weeks; for lipoprotein
tiple thromboses in at least 3 organ systems in less than 1
apheresis, 2 sessions per week for 3 weeks followed by
week. It typically affects small vessels of the kidneys, lungs,
6 weekly treatments
➢ Sinha A, Gulati A, Saini S, et al. Prompt plasma ex- and lactate dehydrogenase level is near normal for 2-3
changes and immunosuppressive treatment improves consecutive days
the outcomes of anti-factor H autoantibody-associated
hemolytic uremic syndrome in children. Kidney Int. Additional Readings
2014;85(5):1151-1160. https://doi.org/10.1038/ ➢ Sarode R, Bandarenko N, Brecher ME, et al. Thrombotic
ki.2013.373 +ESSENTIAL READING thrombocytopenic purpura: 2012 American Society for
➢ Iorember F, Nayak A. Deficiency of CFHR plasma Apheresis (ASFA) consensus conference on classifica-
proteins and autoantibody positive hemolytic uremic tion, diagnosis, management, and future research. J Clin
syndrome: treatment rationale, outcomes, and Apher. 2014;29(3):148-167. https://doi.org/10.1
monitoring. Pediatr Nephrol. 2021;36(6):1365-1375. 002/jca.21302
https://doi.org/10.1 007/s00467-020-04652-x ➢ Bendapudi PK, Hurwitz S, Fry A, et al. Derivation and
external validation of the PLASMIC score for rapid
assessment of adults with thrombotic micro-
Thrombotic Microangiopathy: Ticlopidine-
angiopathies: a cohort study. Lancet Haematol.
Associated
2017;4(4):e157-e164. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Drug-induced TMA has been associated with numerous S2352-3026(17)30026-1 +ESSENTIAL READING
drugs, including but not limited to ticlopidine, ➢ Zheng XL, Vesely SK, Cataland SR, et al. ISTH guide-
calcineurin inhibitors, and gemcitabine. Ticlopidine lines for treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic
usually presents with severely diminished ADAMTS13 purpura. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(10):2496-2502.
levels (<10%) within 2 weeks of drug exposure, often https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15010 +ESSENTIAL READING
with an autoan- tibody directed against ADAMTS13.
timing, and drug overdose. Semin Dial. 2012;25(2):176- symptoms abate and there is cessation of delayed toxin
189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.01 release from tissues.
030.x For question 5, option (c), protein binding of 90%,
➢ Puisset F, White-Koning M, Kamar N, et al. is the best answer. The volume of distribution of lev-
Population pharmacokinetics of rituximab with or othyroxine is 0.1-0.2 L/kg, with 90% protein-bound
without plas- mapheresis in kidney patients with (Table 6), both of which are favorable characteristics
antibody-mediated disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. for removal by TPE.
2013;76(5):734-740.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12098
➢ Mahmoud SH, Buhler J, Chu E, Chen SA, Human T. Additional Reading
Drug dosing in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma ➢ King JD, Kern MH, Jaar BG. Extracorporeal removal of
exchange. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(1):301-311. https:// poisons and toxins. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.
doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00989-1 +ESSENTIAL 2019;14(9):1408-1415. https://doi.org/10.2215/
READING CJN.02560319 +ESSENTIAL READING