Effect of Music Therapy On Hospital Induced Anxiety and HRQoL in CABG Patients
Effect of Music Therapy On Hospital Induced Anxiety and HRQoL in CABG Patients
net/publication/337193443
CITATIONS READS
8 1,598
3 authors:
Ajith Soman
Shaqra University
13 PUBLICATIONS 28 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Sukumar Shanmugam on 14 December 2019.
Keywords: Cardiac rehabilitation, Cardiac surgery, Coronary artery disease, Sedative music
INTRODUCTION low ejection fraction, emotional response, and sleep along with
In India, CAD is a major causative factor for death which contributes cardiac symptoms affect the Health Related quality of life [9-11].
more than 25% of death among general population [1]. Elevated Low Cardiac rehabilitation is the standard of care after CABG. Cardiac
Density Lipoproteins (LDL) and other factors such as change the rehabilitation consists of several definitions but all the systems of
permeability of vessel wall and generate inflammatory reactions which definition poses common focus on a multidisciplinary approach and
cause migration of monocytes to the site of inflammation. Monocytes it is mainly directed to patient’s physical, psychological and social
then convert into macrophages, which is rich in cholesterol esters wellbeing. Cardiac rehabilitation is the essential care after CABG
and free fatty acids thus infiltrate the coronary vessels and reduce with level Ia evidence [12].
the coronary blood flow to the cardiac muscles [2]. Music therapy is considered as an alternative intervention to reduce
Preventive measures (diet modification, weight reduction, smoking the anxiety and without any side effects [13-16]. Sedative music has
cessation, cholesterol control, and control of diabetes and high shown better improvement in patients undergone heart surgery [17].
blood pressure) and medications are used in the early stage of the Listening to music arouse activities in nucleus accumbens NAc and
disease [3]. In severe cases, CABG is employed to improve the Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) and releases dopamine. There is
circulatory compromise. Anxiety caused by fear of death, or level release of endorphins and reduction in catecholamine release which
change in health conditions, stressful setting in the ICU, continuous in turn lowers blood pressure [18]. A systematic review supports
monitoring by nurses, surrounding noise contributes to depression the effect of music therapy on anxiety in hospitalised persons [19].
in post surgery patients. Patients undergo anxiety and depression Listening to music during bed rest after open-heart surgery has some
after surgery due to factors like fear, pain, and lack of sleep can lead effects on the relaxation system as regards s-oxytocin and subjective
to reduced functional mobility and thereby reducing health related relaxations levels [20]. It has found to be cost effective and improves
quality of life [4-8]. quality of life in patients. Music reduces environmental sounds and
provides calm atmosphere thereby enhance psychological well-
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) is an essential aspect
being [21,22].
in assessing the outcome of any surgical intervention. Various
studies investigated the factors contributing to the reduction In addition, few studies have made known that heart rate and
in quality of life after surgeries and found to have a relationship respiratory rate improve, and oxygen consumption decreases
between psychosocial factors, demographic factors, and patient- after music therapy and found out that music therapy lowers the
related characteristics. Factors such as sex, diabetes mellitus, Heart Rate, Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), and Mean Arterial
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2019 Nov, Vol-13(11): YC05-YC09 5
Abeeshna Ashok et al., Effect of Music Therapy on Hospital Induced Anxiety and Health Related Quality of Life in Coronary www.jcdr.net
Pressure (MAP) among patients undergoing CABG. Also, studies according to his/her comfort and cardiac the rehabilitation protocol.
reveal that music therapy reduces the level of anxiety among The sedative music without lyrics (60-80 beats per minute) was
patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Music therapy reduces pain delivered for 20 minutes, once daily from the postoperative day-1
perception and the dosage of analgesics administered during the to postoperative day-7. This method of music therapy was delivered
intensive care unit and surgery unit stays of patients undergoing along with the Phase I cardiac rehabilitation programme [14,17,27].
coronary artery surgery. Few studies showed that music therapy All the patients in control group received Phase I cardiac rehabilitation
did not affect HR, SBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), MAP, and from postoperative day 1 to 7 with the help of multidisciplinary
anxiety among patients undergoing cardiac surgery [23-26]. rehabilitation team [28]. Patients received 20 minutes of cardiac
The present authors found that there is a lack of evidence to provide rehabilitation in a day and the protocol was purely individualised.
music therapy as an adjunct in Phase I cardiac rehabilitation. The The progression of the treatment was decided based on patient’s
present authors assumed that music therapy along with the standard condition. Hospital anxiety and depression score was taken on
cardiac rehabilitation may enhance the quality of life and prevent or postoperative day 2 by trained outcome assessor (co-operation of
control anxiety. Therefore, conducted this study to evaluate the role the patient was ensured). All the outcome measures were taken
of music therapy in the standard cardiac rehabilitation protocol for by a trained therapist on postoperative day 7. Hospital anxiety
improving the health-related quality of life and reduce the anxiety. and depression scores were assessed on the postoperative day-2
and day-7 by an independent physiotherapist who was blinded
MATERIALS AND METHODS to group and intervention allocation. All other outcome measures
Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee, such as 6 minute walk test and SF-36 questionnaire were taken on
Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, Deralakatte, Mangalore (Ref:NIPT/ postoperative day 7 by the same therapist [29-31].
IEC/Min//001/2016-2017/dated16-03-2017). Written permission Patients were discharged on postoperative day 6, patients who
to conduct this randomised controlled trial was obtained from the were not shifted from coronary care unit till postoperative day 7,
Head of the Cardiovascular Surgery Department and informed patients who died during the study and who refused to participate
consent was obtained from patients. The study was prospectively after surgery were considered to be drop out from the study. Patients
registered in the clinical trials registry-India with the registration were discharged based on the functional outcome on postoperative
number of CTRI/2017/06/008927. day 7. Intention-to-treat analysis was done after data collection and
To calculate sample size the technique of estimation of sample size drop out patients were also included in the analysis.
for paired t-test was used:
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Pre test mean-post test mean The data were analysed using SPSS software version 16.0. The
SD demographic data like age, gender were analysed using descriptive
(Z1-α/2+Z1-β)2 (Z1-α/2) statistics. To compare the outcome measures before and after
N= + interventions paired t-test used and when <2 time measurement
Δ2 2
were there Bonferroni was used. To compare the effectiveness of
Where Δ is technically significant (0.7). α is the confidence level (5%)
interventions between the groups ‘independent sample t-test’ used.
1-α is power of the test (80%). SD is the standard deviation. The
When data did not follow normal distribution Mann-Whitney U test
calculated sample size in each group was 17.
was used to compare between group variables or Wilcoxon sign
A sample size of 40 was considered and 40 sealed envelopes were rank test to compare variables within the group. The p-value less
made. Patients who were willing to participate and who met the than 0.05 was considered significant.
inclusion criteria were randomised and allocated into two groups
based on computer generated randomisation and sequentially RESULTS
numbered opaque sealed envelope method. A total of 55 patients were screened for eligibility during the period
Inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in [Table/Fig-1]. Based on of August 2017 to March 2018. Out of these, 40 patients were
inclusion-exclusion criteria baseline data of patients were obtained randomly allocated into two groups [Table/Fig-2]. The participants’
prior to intervention (including heart rate, respiratory rate, blood characteristics are summarised in [Table/Fig-3].
pressure, body mass index, rate of perceived exertion, 6 minute walk
test, SF-36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, history regarding Hospital Anxiety and Depression
any other medical treatment and other health related conditions). Score (HADS) DEPRESSION
[Table/Fig-4] shows that there was a significant difference in POD-7
Inclusion criteria in depression component between groups.
• Subjects 30-80 years of age [Table/Fig-5] shows, within the intervention group at preoperative day
• Both male and female patients
• CABG both on pump and off pump.
and postoperative day 7, and postoperative day 2 and 7 the p-values
• Patients with LVEF <60% were <0.05 and hence there was a difference in depression. In
• Patients with 2 grafts control group at POD 2 and POD7 there was a difference (p<0.05).
Exclusion criteria
• Patients who are having hearing impairments Hospital Anxiety and Depression
• Patients after postoperative day 7, enter into phase II cardiac rehabilitation Score (HADS) ANXIETY
• Patients with multiple procedures (E.g., CABG+ valve replacement)
Comparisons of anxiety component of HADS score showed no
• Patients who do not have interest in music
• Patient contraindicated to 6 minute walk test difference [Table/Fig-6].
[Table/Fig-1]: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. [Table/Fig-7] shows significant difference between preoperative day
and postoperative day 7 and postoperative day 2 and 7 (intervention
Prior to the delivery of music the head-phones were sterilised with group) and postoperative day 2 and 7 (control group) in HADS
steriliser (ALCO SWAB® containing 70% alcohol- Isopropyl alcohol). anxiety component for the same.
Instructions were given prior to the intervention, instructed patient
to inform the therapist whenever he/she felt discomfort in between Six Minute Walk Test (6 MWT)
the treatment session. During the delivery of sedative music the The [Table/Fig-8] shows 6 minute walk test comparison between
volume and pitch were adjusted according to patient’s comfort. groups. The obtained p-values were >0.05 hence there was no
Position of the patient during the music therapy was selected difference in 6 MWT.
6 Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2019 Nov, Vol-13(11): YC05-YC09
www.jcdr.net Abeeshna Ashok et al., Effect of Music Therapy on Hospital Induced Anxiety and Health Related Quality of Life in Coronary
Age (years) 59.85 7.92 60.8 7.75 0.970 Intervention (n=20) PRE & POD7 12.93 0.684
Male 6 6 0.634 [Table/Fig-9]: Within group comparison of 6 MWT by using independent sample t test.
*indicates significant
Female 14 14
BMI (kg/m2) 25.18 5.11 23.11 3.65 0.264 SF-36
HR (beats per minute) 75.65 13.488 75.55 12.194 0.486 Physical component summary: The [Table/Fig-10] shows the
RR (breaths per minute) 21.65 4.998 22.15 5.040 0.754
values of between group comparison of physical component
summary of SF-36 score. It indicates that there was no significant
RPE 7.97 2.377 7.35 2.153 0.396
difference in SF-36 scores.
Systolic BP (mmHg) 122.0 0.396 123.5 11.821 0.421
The [Table/Fig-11] shows significant difference in intervention group
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 78.500 8.750 79.500 8.255 0.522
for the physical component summary of SF-36 score.
6 MWT (distance in metres) 264.55 85.398 276.85 116.670 0.706
[Table/Fig-3]: Participant baseline characteristics by using descriptive statistics. Intervention (n=20) Control (n=20)
Mean SD Mean SD t value p-value
Intervention (n=20) Control (n=20)
PRE 40.69 6.813 40.232 6.867 0.214 0.628
Mean SD Mean SD “t” p-value
POD-7 46.99 6.311 43.372 8.23 1.321 0.355
PRE 5.53 2.722 5.53 2.47 0.046 0.964 [Table/Fig-10]: Between group comparisons of physical component of SF-36 score
POD-2 4.87 2.446 6.29 3.099 -1.44 0.159 by using independent sample t-test.
Intervention (n=20) Control (n=20) in patients after CABG. There was no obvious clinically significant
t value p-value difference between groups in physical and mental component
Mean SD Mean SD
score. Physical component of SF-36 outcome did not show
PRE 37.65 9.63 39.88 6.270 -0.869 0.123
significant difference between the groups with p-value was >0.05.
POD-7 42.68 9.70 42.71 9.508 -0.009* 0.854 Mental component of SF-36 has been established, no significant
[Table/Fig-12]: Comparison of mental component of SF-36 score between the improvement between the groups and within the group was seen.
group by using independent sample t test.
There was significant improvement in Physical component of SF-36
within the intervention group.
Mean difference p-value
Comparison of cardiovascular indices after treatment showed that
Intervention (n=20) PRE & POD7 -4.273 0.210
there is a significant difference in heart rate and rate of perceived
Control (n=20) PRE & POD7 -2.001 0.550 exertion; there was no significant difference in respiratory rate and
[Table/Fig-13]: Within group comparison by using Bonferroni test. systolic and diastolic BP within each group and between groups.
The results does not correlates with the findings of research done
PRE POST by Heidari S et al., which state that there is no significant difference
Mean SD Mean SD “t” p-value among cardiovascular indices after music therapy in patients
Intervention 46.667 23.503 65.332 22.635 -2.441 0.029* following surgery [32].
PF
Control 45.000 25.343 57.885 20.726 -1.419 0.179 Effect of music on health-related quality of life along with Phase I
Intervention 37.083 31.112 51.666 26.142 -3.205 0.006* cardiac rehabilitation has not been evaluated in any of the studies to
RP date to the best of authors’ knowledge. Kurfirst V et al., demonstrated
Control 44.196 16.710 46.875 18.467 -0.442 0.666
that there is an improvement in health-related quality of life after one
Intervention 47.066 26.477 65.000 32.958 -1.757 0.101
BP year by using the SF-36 score in cardiac surgery patients, our study
Control 45.500 26.258 53.214 26.873 -0.652 0.526 showed that there is an improvement in HRQOL in CABG patients
Intervention 54.466 18.360 66.066 14.404 -2.054 0.059* till discharge from hospital (Phase I cardiac rehabilitation) [9]. The
GH
Control 60.500 17.986 65.000 17.119 -0.706 0.493 prolonged effect is out of scope of the present study. Future studies
Intervention 51.250 15.345 59.166 16.781 -2.588 0.021*
can be done to find out the prolonged-effect on the quality of life in
VT CABG patients after music therapy. This is the first study evaluating
Control 53.571 20.904 59.375 19.107 -0.756 0.463
the effect of music therapy on health related quality of life.
Intervention 54.166 23.464 48.333 23.081 0.959 0.354
SF
Control 55.357 26.726 43.750 21.230 1.247 0.234 LIMITATION
Intervention 33.889 27.180 57.778 28.948 -3.170 0.007* Patient received sedative music which is not of patient’s choice. The
RE
Control 51.190 23.763 52.975 25.235 -0.225 0.825 follow-up treatment outcomes has not been considered in the study,
Intervention 61.000 19.838 66.666 23.196 -0.732 0.476 the effect of music therapy on functional outcomes after discharge
PF is not known. The sample strength is not sufficient to provide an
Control 55.357 19.361 71.428 20.232 -2.337 0.036*
accurate result.
[Table/Fig-14]: Within group comparison of eight components of SF-36 score by
using paired t-test.
CONCLUSION
DISCUSSION In conclusion, the present authors demonstrate that music therapy
This study primarily aimed at finding the effect of music therapy on during Stage-I cardiac rehabilitation is found to be effective to reduce
postoperative anxiety. HADS score showed significant difference postoperative anxiety and improve quality of life in CABG patients.
within each groups nevertheless there was no significant difference The present authors also suggest that it’s an effective and harmless
in the outcome between the groups. This result correlates with the means for the management of hospital induced anxiety.
study by Heidari S et al., which showed music therapy reduces
anxiety in CABG patients. They had made the patients listen to REFERENCES
music for 30 minutes and assessed the cardiovascular indices and [1] Gupta R, Joshi P, Mohan V, Reddy KS, Yusuf S. Epidemiology and causation of
coronary heart disease and stroke in India. Heart. 2008;94(1):16-26.
anxiety immediately after the intervention [32]. Their study does not [2] Barquera S, Pedroza-Tobías A, Medina C, Hernández-Barrera L, Bibbins-Domingo
provide any information regarding the effect of music therapy on K, Lozano R, Moran AE. Global overview of the epidemiology of atherosclerotic
anxiety until the day of discharge. However, in the index research, cardiovascular disease. Archives of Medical Research. 2015;46(5):328-38.
we clarified that the music therapy effects could prolong till the 7th [3] Rashid MA, Edwards D, Walter FM, Mant J. Medication taking in coronary artery
disease: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. The Annals of Family
day. For further clarification regarding the prolonged impact of music Medicine. 2014;12(3):224-32.
therapy along with cardiac rehabilitation follow-up measurement [4] Mullany CJ. Coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2003;107(3):e21-22.
should be included after discharge which was beyond the scope of [5] Nesami MB, Shorofi SA, Jafari A, Khalilian AR, Tabari SZ. The relationship
between stressors and anxiety levels after CABG in Sari, Iran. Iranian Red
the present study.
Crescent Medical Journal. 2016;18(5).
Change in anxiety and depression scores within the control group [6] Hewitt J. Psycho-affective disorder in intensive care units: a review. Journal of
may be due to the improvement in the functional status of the patient Clinical Nursing. 2002;11(5):575-84.
[7] Rodrigues HF, Furuya RK, Dantas RA, Dessotte CA. Ansiedade e depressão em
as a result of Phase I cardiac rehabilitation. These results correlate cirurgia cardíaca: diferenças entre sexo e faixa etária. Escola Anna Nery Revista
with the quasi-experimental study conducted by Ku SL et al., [33]. de Enfermagem. 2016;20(3).
In general, music has positive impact on anxiety and depression [8] Tully PJ, Baker RA. Depression, anxiety, and cardiac morbidity outcomes after
coronary artery bypass surgery: a contemporary and practical review. Journal of
along with cardiac-rehabilitation and is the most advisable.
geriatric cardiology: JGC. 2012;9(2):197.
The secondary aim of the study was to identify the effect of music [9] Kurfirst V, Mokráč ek A, Krupauerová M, Cˇ anádyová J, Bulava A, Pešl L, et al. Health-
on health-related quality of life. A 6 MWT was the objective outcome related quality of life after cardiac surgery–the effects of age, preoperative conditions
and postoperative complications. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2014;9(1):46.
which did not show significant difference within the intervention [10] Rantanen A, Tarkka MT, Kaunonen M, Tarkka M, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM, et
group as well as between the groups where p-value is >0.05. al. Health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of
The mean difference was more in the cardiac rehabilitation group, advanced nursing. 2009;65(9):1926-36.
[11] Kidd T, Poole L, Leigh E, Ronaldson A, Jahangiri M, Steptoe A. Health-related
suggesting that 6 MWT did not show any significant improvement
personal control predicts depression symptoms and quality of life but not health
in experimental group, however, no adverse events were found behaviour following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Journal of Behavioral
during the intervention so it can be administered as a useful therapy Medicine. 2016;39(1):120-27.
[12] Niebauer J. Is there a role for cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass [24] Emami Zeydi A, Jafari H, Khani S, Esmaeili R, Gholipour Baradari A. The effect
grafting? Treatment after coronary artery bypass surgery remains incomplete of music on the vital signs and SpO2 of patients after open heart surgery: a
without rehabilitation. Circulation. 2016;133(24):2529-37. randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences.
[13] Sendelbach SE, Halm MA, Doran KA, Miller EH, Gaillard P. Effects of music 2011;21(82):73-82.
therapy on physiological and psychological outcomes for patients undergoing [25] Hatem TP, Lira PI, Mattos SS. The therapeutic effects of music in children
cardiac surgery. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2006;21(3):194-200. following cardiac surgery. Jornal de Pediatria. 2006;82(3):186-92.
[14] Comeaux T, Steele-Moses S. The effect of complementary music therapy on [26] Ciğ erci Y, Özbayır T. The effects of music therapy on anxiety, pain and the amount
the patient’s postoperative state anxiety, pain control, and environmental noise of analgesics following coronary artery surgery. Turkish Journal of Thoracic and
satisfaction. Medsurg Nursing. 2013;22(5). Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;24(1).
[15] Allred KD, Byers JF, Sole ML. The effect of music on postoperative pain and [27] Ashok A, Soman A. Efficacy of music therapy on hospital induced anxiety and
anxiety. Pain Management Nursing. 2010;11(1):15-25. health related quality of life in Coronary Artery bypass graft patients: Study
[16] Fayazi S, Babashahi M, Rezaei M. The effect of inhalation aromatherapy on protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 2018;9(2):68-72.
anxiety level of the patients in preoperative period. Iranian Journal of Nursing and [28] Babu A, Noone M, Haneef M, Naryanan S. Protocol-guided phase-1 cardiac
Midwifery Research. 2011;16(4):278. rehabilitation in patients with ST-Elevation myocardial infarction in a rural hospital.
[17] Voss JA, Good M, Yates B, Baun MM, Thompson A, Hertzog M. Sedative Heart Views. 2010;11(2):52.
music reduces anxiety and pain during chair rest after open-heart surgery. Pain. [29] Stafford L, Berk M, Jackson HJ. Validity of the hospital anxiety and depression
2004;112(1-2):197-203. scale and patient health questionnaire-9 to screen for depression in patients with
[18] Menon V, Levitin DJ. The rewards of music listening: response and physiological coronary artery disease. General Hosp Psychiatry. 2007;29(5):417-24.
connectivity of the mesolimbic system. Neuroimage. 2005;28(1):175-84. [30] ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. ATS Committee on
[19] Nilsson U. The anxiety-and pain-reducing effects of music interventions: a Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. Am J Respir
systematic review. AORN Journal. 2008;87(4):780-807. Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111-17.
[20] Nilsson U. Soothing music can increase oxytocin levels during bed rest after [31] Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et
open-heart surgery: A randomised control trial. Journal of Clinical Nursing. al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for
2009;18(15):2153-61. primary care. BMJ. 1992;305(6846):160-64.
[21] Lippi D, di Sarsina PR, D’Elios JP. Music and medicine. Journal of Multidisciplinary [32] Heidari S, Babai A, Abbasinia M, Shamali M, Abbasi M, Rezaei M. The effect of music
Healthcare. 2010;3:137. on anxiety and cardiovascular indices in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass
[22] Kemper KJ, Danhauer SC. Music as therapy. South Med J. 2005;98(3):282-88. graft: a randomized controlled trial. Nursing and Midwifery Studies. 2015;4(4).
[23] Twiss E, Seaver J, McCaffrey R. The effect of music listening on older [33] Ku SL, Ku CH, Ma FC. Effects of phase I cardiac rehabilitation on anxiety of
adults undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Nursing in Critical Care. patients hospitalized for coronary artery bypass graft in Taiwan. Heart & Lung.
2006;11(5):224-31. 2002;31(2):133-40.
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
2. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
3. Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Shaqra University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS: [Jain H et al.] Etymology: Author Origin
Abeeshna Ashok, • Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 27, 2019
Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), • Manual Googling: Sep 23, 2019
Mangalore, Karnataka, India. • iThenticate Software: Oct 10, 2019 (10%)
E-mail: [email protected]
Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: No Date of Submission: Aug 27, 2019
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes Date of Peer Review: Sep 03, 2019
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes Date of Acceptance: Sep 24, 2019
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2019