0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views5 pages

Does Presence of Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Thyroid Auto Antibodies Affect Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnancy A Record-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Uploaded by

angelmacahe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views5 pages

Does Presence of Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Thyroid Auto Antibodies Affect Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnancy A Record-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Uploaded by

angelmacahe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 61 (2022) 960e964

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology


journal homepage: www.tjog-online.com

Original Article

Does presence of subclinical hypothyroidism and thyroid auto


antibodies affect pregnancy outcomes in pregnancy? A record-based
cross-sectional study
Ülkü Ayşe Türker Aras a, *, Burcu Dinçgez b
a
Kafkas University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Şehitler Street No: 1, Kars, Turkey
b
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emniyet Street No: 1, Bursa, Turkey

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Objective: Our aim in this study is to determine the relationship between TPOAb positivity and preg-
Accepted 29 June 2022 nancy outcomes in the subclinical hypothyroid patient group.
Materials and methods: This study was started with 21,321 pregnant women, but after the exclusion
Keywords: criteria, 11,387 pregnant women were included int his study. Demographic characteristics of each patient
Subclinical hypothyroidism group included in the study, such as age, bodymass index (BMI), and laboratory parameters such as
Pregnancy
complete blood count (hemogram), liver and kidney function tests, type of delivery, birth weight,
Impaired glucose tolerance
neonatal intensive care admission, 1st and 5th minute APGAR scores, glucose tolerance test results,
Neonatal outcome
Maternal outcome
whether there was high blood pressure during pregnancy, whether there was premature rupture of
Thyroid auto antibodies membranes were recorded from the hospital information system and patient files.
Results: Pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism were divided into groups according to their
TPOAb status. When maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated between groups; Among these
four groups there was a statistically significant difference only in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)
antibody groups with and without subclinical hypothyroidism according to their positivity (p < 0.01).
When the euthyroid TPOAb negative group was taken as reference, the risk of impaired and TPOAb
positive groups (OR: 1.210; 95% CI: 0.936e1.563; P ¼ 0.145), impaired in the group with subclinical
hypothyroidism but TPOAb positivity glucose tolerance 1.358(OR: 1.358); 95% CI: 1.042e1.770; P ¼ 0.023)
fold increased by 3.556 (OR: 3.556) in the group with subclinical hypothyroidism and TPOAb positivity;
(95% CI: 2.37e5.343; p < 0,001).
Conclusion: In ourstudy, there was a significant difference only in terms of IGT between the Groups with
and without subclinical hypothyroidism, depending on whether they were positive for TPOAb or not.
Therefore, studies in volving larger patient groups are needed.
© 2022 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an
open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction clear information about how to follow-up pregnant women with


SCH, whether treat them or not and pregnancy outcomes [2,3].
Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is defined as a high serum Although a statistically significant difference was detected in terms
thyrotropin (TSH) level and a normal serum thyroxine (sT4) level of pregnancy outcomes between pregnant women with and
[1]. Hypothyroidism is defined a slow sT4 and elevated TSH levels. without SCH in some studies [5e16], no statistical differences were
Although SCH is detected in 1.5e42.9% during pregnancy, hypo- reported in some studies [4e7]. On the other hand, Thyroid auto-
thyroidism is detected in 0.4%. On the other hand, treating hypo- antibody positivity (TPOAb) is among the common causes of hy-
thyroidism during pregnancy has effects on maternal and fetal pothyroidism in women in there productive period. In some pre-
morbidity and mortality. For this reason, treatment is important [2]. vious studies, it was reported that TPOAb positivity affects
However, when the literature data were examined, there was no pregnancy outcomes [3]. The purpose of the present was to eval-
uate pregnancy outcomes according to TPOAb positivity and
negativity in the pregnant population with and without SCH.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected] (Ü.A. Türker Aras).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2022.06.013
1028-4559/© 2022 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Ü.A. Türker Aras and B. Dinçgez Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 61 (2022) 960e964

Material and method Table 1


Definitions of variables: [30e36].

The region where the study was conducted Definition on variables

Loss of pregnancy Excretion of pregnancy material outside the


It was conducted in the obstetrics and gynecology department uterus before the 20th gestational week.
of a 3rd level health institution. Impaired Glucose Plasma glucoselevelis 100e126 mg/dL in fasting
Tolerance (IGT) measurement
Gestational Diabetes The 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was
Data source
Mellitus (GDM) performed. The presence of any of the following
diagnosis parameters in the measurements was
The data were obtained from the records of pregnant women considered as GDM:
who applied to the obstetrics and gynecology clinic of a 3rd level Fasting glucose  92 mg/dL
1st-hour glucose  180 mg/dL
hospital.
2nd-hour glucose  153 mg/dL
Pregnancy-Induced Blood pressure at or over 140/90 mmHg after
Study population Hypertension (HDP) the 20th gestational week
Decollement placenta The separation of the placenta from the uterine
The number of pregnant women who applied to the clinic in the cavity before labor occurs
Early Membrane The spontaneous separation of fetal membranes
first trimester and had TSH, sT4, whose TPOAb was checked be-
Rupture (EMR) before labor begins
tween December 2017 and applied, the study was continued with Placenta previa The placement of all or part of the placenta in
11,387 pregnant women. the lower uterine segment.
Preterm birth Labor occurs between the 24e37th weeks of
Exclusion criteria pregnancy
Low Birth Weight The fetus is less than 2500 g
(LBW)
Being younger than 18 years old, being older than 35 years, not NICU hospitalization Severe jaundice
continuing pregnancy follow-ups in our hospital, pregnancy not indications
being terminated in our hospital, absence of TSH, sT4, TPOAb data Births earlier than the 32nd gestational week
Respiratory distress
registered in our hospital system in the first trimester, first
Need for cardiorespiratory monitoring
trimester TSH > 10 mIU/L or TSH being <0.1 mIU/L, receiving Neonatal sepsis
treatment with thyroxine or anti thyroid drugs, pregnant women Conditions requiring exchange transfusion
with overt thyroid dysfunction, presence of any auto immune or
heart disease, history of diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disor-
der, multiple pregnancies, diagnosis of structural or genetic ab-
Statistical analysis
normality in the current pregnancy, liver or kidney failure, anemia
Statistical analyzes were made by using the SPSS statistical
(hemoglobin10 g/dL), any known thyroid disease in the past or a
software version 21.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences).
family history of thyroid disease, drug use affecting thyroid func-
All data were reported as mean ± standard deviation, median
tions, uterine pathologies, history of recurrent pregnancy loss,
(minimum:maximum) values, or in percentages. Normal distribu-
preterm birth in previous pregnancies, history of placental abnor-
tion fit test was performed and an Anova test was used to compare
mality, and alcohol or smoking as addictive substance use.
the means. The Chi-Square. Test was performed to evaluate the
relationship between the categorical variables. Significant variables
Definitions of the laboratory measurements
were included in the Backward Logistics Regression Analysis
P < 0.05 was considered significant.
In all laboratory examinations, measurements were made from
fasting venous blood samples. Coulter LH780 Analyzer (Bechmen
Coulter Ireland, Inc.) was used for hematological measurements; Results
liver and kidney function tests were evaluated by using Abbott
Diagnostics C80002 (Abbott) Auto-Analyzer. Serum TSH, serums T4 In the present study, the rate of SCH was determined as 12.4%.
levels, and TPOAb were evaluated with Beckman Coulter DX1800 TPOAb positive SCH rate was 1.8%, TPOAb negative SCH rate was
electrochemilumnesence immunoassay. 10.5%, TPOAb positive euthyroid rate was 12.4%, and TPOAb nega-
tive euthyroid rate was 75.1%. TPOAb positivity was detected as
Variables of the study 14.4% in all pregnant women. The demographic and laboratory
parameters of the pregnant women are given in Table 1. In this
Dependent variables respect, no statistically significant differences were detected be-
Pregnancy outcomes. tween the groups in terms of age, BMI, HB, hematocrit (HTC),
platelet (PLT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino
Independent variables transferase (ALT), and urea values (p ¼ 0.089; p ¼ 0.534; p ¼ 0.679;
Subclinical hypothyroidism accompanied by TPOAb positivity p ¼ 0.606; p ¼ 0.069; p ¼ 0.842; p ¼ 0.063; p ¼ 0.375 respectively).
(SCH þ abþ), subclinical hypothyroidism accompanied by TPOAb When the maternal results were evaluated, statistically signifi-
negativity (SCH þ ab), the euthyroid group accompanied by cant differences were detected between the independent variable
TPOAb positivity (SCH  abþ), and euthyroid group accompanied and, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (p ¼ 0.001), the dependent
by TPOAb negativity (SCH  ab). variable. No statistically significant differences were detected be-
Variable definitions are given in Table 1. tween pregnancy loss, GDM, high blood pressure during pregnancy,
placenta previa, abruption and delivery types (p ¼ 0.066, p ¼ 0.905,
Permission for the study p ¼ 0.262, p ¼ 0.051, p ¼ 0.943, p ¼ 0.514, respectively) (Table 2).
The study was conducted retrospectively (see Table 2). Approval On the other hand, when neonatal outcomes were examined, no
was obtained from the local ethics committee. The study was statistical differences were detected between the in dependent and
conducted in line with the declaration of Helsinki. dependent variables (NICU, APGAR<7, LBW, PROM, preterm birth)
961
Ü.A. Türker Aras and B. Dinçgez Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 61 (2022) 960e964

Table 2
Distribution of the demographic and laboratory parameters between the study groups.

SCH () AB () SCH () AB (þ) SCH (þ) AB () SCH (þ) AB (þ) P

(n ¼ 8552) (n ¼ 1423) (n ¼ 1200) (n ¼ 212)

Age (years) 27.22 ± 4.47 27.51 ± 4.51 27.40 ± 4.44 27.08 ± 4.23 0.089
BMI (kg/m2) 25.08 ± 3.245 25.12 ± 3.29 25.22 ± 3.30 25.12 ± 3.14 0.534
HB (g/dl) 11.87 ± 2.12 11.94 ± 2.88 11.90 ± 3.07 11.79 ± 0.88 0.679
HTC (%) 35.95 ± 2.82 36.04 ± 2.91 35.92 ± 2.95 35.83 ± 2.86 0.606
PLT (*103/ml) 268.05 ± 62.12 264.93 ± 60.59 265.64 ± 59.48 260.22 ± 58.07 0.069
AST (IU/L) 18.96 ± 6.96 18.86 ± 6.75 19.03 ± 6.96 19.28 ± 7.14 0.842
ALT (IU/L) 14.72 ± 7.18 14.56 ± 6.83 15.18 ± 6.76 15.42 ± 6.80 0.063
Urea (mg/Dl) 7.49 ± 2.58 7.37 ± 2.73 7.45 ± 1.81 7.38 ± 1.90 0.375

a e SCH: Subclinical Hypothyroidism; b e TPOAb: thyroid antibody; c e n: number; d e BMI: Body Mass Index; e e HB: Hemogram; f e HTC: Hematocrit; g e PLT: Platelet; h e
ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; i e AST: Aspartate aminotransferase.

(p ¼ 0.763, p ¼ 0.564, p ¼ 0.391, p ¼ 0.159, p ¼ 0.993, respectively) Discussion


(Table 3).
When the study data were analyzed, it was determined that The frequency of thyroid diseases varies greatly. In the results of
only impaired glucose tolerance showed significant variability be- the previous studies conducted in the world. It is emphasized in
tween the groups. According to the Logistic Regression Analys is these studies that this variability occurs because of the presence of
results, when the euthyroid TPOAb negative group is taken as the regions where iodine deficiency is endemic [9]. There is a limitation
reference, the risk of impaired glucose tolerance in the euthyroid in comparing the data because the studies on SCH in pregnant
and TPOAb positive groups did not increase (OR: 1.210; 95% CI: women are so few that they can be counted with fingers (see
0.936e1.563), and the impaired glucose tolerance in the group with Table 5).
subclinical hypothyroidism but not TPOAb positivity was 1.358 (OR: In the present study, the frequency of SCH was found to be
1.358; 95% CI: 1.042e1.770) times, and 3.556 (OR: 3556; 95% CI: 12.4%. It was reported in a meta-analysis that the frequency of SCH
2.37e5343) times more in the group with subclinical hypothy- varied between 1.5% and 42.9% in pregnant women [1]. In a
roidism and TPOAb positivity (Table 4). hospital-based study conducted in Turkey, the frequency of SCH

Table 3
The distribution of the maternal outcomes between the study groups.

Pregnancy loss IGT GDM HDP P. Previa Decollement Birth type

No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes

n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)

SCH þ abþ 199 13 170 29 187 12 181 18 197 2 197 2 111 88


(93.9) (6.0) (85.4) (14.6) (94.0) (6.0) (91.0) (9.0) (99.0) (1.0) (99.0) (1.0) (55.8) (44.2)
SCH þ ab¡ 1128 72 1059 69 1060 68 1043 85 1119 9 1114 14 683 445
(94.0) (6.0) (93.9) (6.1) (94.0) (6.0) (92.5) (7.5) (99.2) (0.8) (98.8) (1.2) (65.3) (39.5)
SCH ¡ ABþ 1349 74 1276 73 1274 75 1259 90 1337 12 1331 18 818 531
(94.8) (5.2) (94.6) (5.4) (94.4) (5.6) (93.3) (6.7) (99.1) (0.9) (98.7) (1.3) (60.6) (39.4)
SCH ¡ ab¡ 8170 382 7796 374 7719 451 7646 524 8136 34 8056 114 4984 3186
(75.3) (70.6) (95.4) (4.61) (94.5) (5.5) (93.6) (6.4) (99.6) (0.4) (98.6) (1.4) (61.0) (39.0)
P 0.066 <0.001 0.905 0.262 0.051 0.943 0.514

a e SCH: Subclinical Hypothyroidism; b e TPOAb: thyroid autoantibody; c e n: number; d e IGT: Impaired Glucose Tolerance; e e GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; f e HDP:
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; g e P. Previa: placenta previa; h e LBW: Low birth weight; i e NICU; Newborn Intensive Care Unit; j e PROM: Preterm Membrane
Rupture; k e APGAR: Activity Pulse Grimace Appearance Respiration Score.

Table 4
The distribution of the neonatal results between the study groups.

NICU APGAR < 7 LBW EMR Preterm Birth

No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes

n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)

SCH þ abþ 191 (96.0) 8 (4.0) 190 (95.5) 9 (4.5) 179 (89.9) 20 (10.1) 182 (91.5) 17 (8.5) 190 (95.5) 9 (4.5)
SCH þ ab¡ 1084 (96.1) 44 (3.9) 1086 (96.3) 42 (3.7) 1052 (93.3) 75 (6.7) 1011 (89.6) 117 (10.4) 1081 (95.8) 47 (4.2)
SCH¡þ 1299 (96.3) 50 (3.7) 1297 (96.1) 52 (3.9) 1251 (92.7) 98 (7.3) 1223 (90.7) 126 (9.3) 1294 (95.9) 55 (4.1)
SCH ¡ ab¡ 7893 (96.6) 277 (3.4) 7899 (96.7) 271 (3.3) 7558 (92.6) 607 (7.4) 7479 (91.5) 691 (8.5) 7829 (95.8) 341 (4.2)
P 0.763 0.564 0.391 0.159 0.993

a e SCH: Subclinical Hypothyroidism; b e TPOAb: thyroid autoantibody; c e n: number; d e IGT: Impaired Glucose Tolerance; e e GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; f e HDP:
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; g e P. Previa: placenta previa; h e LBW: Low birth weight; i e NICU; Newborn Intensive Care Unit; j e PROM: Preterm Membrane
Rupture; k e APGAR: Activity Pulse Grimace Appearance Respiration Score.

962
Ü.A. Türker Aras and B. Dinçgez Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 61 (2022) 960e964

Table 5 levels of the patients in the range of 2.5e10 mIU/ml and the fT4
Logistic regression analysis results of the impaired glucose tolerance test. levels within the normal limits because the study was retrospective
Odds ratio 95 %CI Minemax P value and there were no local parameters for TSH [4].
SCH þ abþ 3.556 2.37e5.343 <0.001
As a conclusion, studies must be conducted to evaluate the
SCH þ ab¡ 1.358 1.042e1.770 0.023 pregnancy outcomes of subclinical hypothyroidism, including more
SCH ¡ abþ 1.210 0.936e1.563 0.145 patients and covering wider areas. Further studies must be con-
SCH ¡ ab¡ 1 (Reference Group) ducted to develop and use the diagnostic criteria for subclinical
a e SCH: Subclinical Hypothyroidism; b e TPOAb: Thyroid Autoantibody; c e CI: hypothyroidism all over the world.
Confidence Interval; d e OR: Odds Ratio.

Conflict of interest
was found to be 19.4% [10]. We believe that this difference in the
There is no conflict of interest among the researchers who
frequency of SCH occurred because these studies we reconducted in
participated in the study.
different regions [3,11]. On the other hand, TPOAb positivity was
found to be 14.4% in the study. When the studies in the literature
are examined, TPOAb positivity is found to be 10e20%, and this was Acknowledgments
found to be consistent with the result of the present study [12].
When the present study was evaluated in integrity, no statistically This study was not funded.
significant differences were detected between maternal and
neonatal outcomes (except IGT) as a result of the comparisons of
References
the in dependent and dependent variables. Although the in
dependent variables were different, there were differences in the [1] Dong AC, Stagnaro-Green A. Differences in diagnostic criteria mask the true
results in the literature when similar parameters were considered. prevalence of thyroid disease in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-
When the studies in the literature were reviewed, the results are analysis. Thyroid 2019 Feb;29(2):278e89.
[2] Negro R, Stagnaro-Green A. Diagnos is and management of subclinical hy-
consistent with the result of our study that pregnancy loss, GDM,
pothyroidism inpregnancy. BMJ 2019;349. g4929.
preterm birth, placenta previa, placental decollement, birthtype, [3] Maraka S, Ospina NM, O'Keeffe DT, Espinosa De Ycaza AE, Gionfriddo MR,
NICU need, 1st or 5th minute APGAR less than 7, LBW, EMR, IUGR Erwin PJ, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Thyroid 2016;26(4):580e90.
yielded no statistically significant differences [3,5,6,13e20]. On the
[4] Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Allan WC, Williams JR, Knight GJ, Gagnon J, et al.
other hand, there are studies that found statistically significant Maternal thyroid deficiency during pregnancy and subsequent neuropsy-
differences in terms of pregnancy loss, GDM, HDP, preterm birth, chological development of the child. N Engl J Med 1999;341:549e55.
plesenta previa, decollement, birtrh type, NICU, APGAR, EMR [5] Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Lambert-Messerlian G, Sullivan L, Canick J,
Porter TF, et al. Maternal thyroid hypofunction and pregnancy outcome.
[3,16,21e28]. In the present study, when the euthyroid TPOAb Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:85e92.
negative group was taken as the reference, the risk of impaired [6] M€annisto € T, Va
€a€ra
€sma€ki M, Pouta A, Hartikainen AL, Ruokonen A, Surcel HM,
glucose tolerance in the euthyroid and TPOAb positive groups was et al. Perinatal outcome of children born to mothers with thyroid dysfunction
nor antibodies: a prospective population-based cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol
not increased (OR: 1.210; 95% CI 0.936e1.563; P ¼ 0.145); the Metab 2009;94:772.
impaired glucose tolerance in the group that had subclinical hy- [7] Sahu MT, Das V, Mittal S, Agarwal A, Sahu M. Overt and subclinical thyroid
pothyroidism but not TPOAb positivity was 1.358 (OR: 1.358; 95% CI dysfunction among Indian pregnant women and its effect on maternal and
fetal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;281:215e20.
1.042e1.770; P ¼ 0.023) times more; and it was 3.556 (OR: 3556; [8] M€annisto € T, Va
€a€ra
€sma€ki M, Pouta A, Hartikainen AL, Ruokonen A, Surcel HM,
95% CI 2.37e5.343; p < 0.001) times more in the group with sub- et al. Thyroid dysfunction and auto anti bodies during pregnancy as predictive
clinical hypothyroidism and TPOAb positivity. This result is factors of pregnancy complications and maternal morbidity in later life. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:1084e109.
compatible with the result of the previous study conducted by
[9] Sezgin Y. Past, present and future of endemic goiter. Turk J Family Med Pri-
Çakmak et al. [25]. In the present study, we think that although the mary Care 2021;19(1):1e4.
risk of developing IGT differed at statistical levels between the [10] Kabaca S, Bozdag €g
 H, O ütçüog
lu FBS, Go
€kdaglı F, Kavak H, Tanyolaç N. C. It’s
effect on subclinical thyroid dysfunctions and obstetric outcomes in first
groups, the reason for the lack of a significant difference in the risk
trimester pregnancies. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi
of developing GDM was that there were no reference values for the 2016;13(4):143e7.
diagnosis of SCH in the region where the study was conducted. [11] Medici M, Korevaar TI, Visser WE, Visser TJ, Peeters RP. Thyroid function in
When the studies in the literature that examined the effects of SCH pregnancy: what is normal? Clin Chem 2015;61:704e13.
[12] Mehran L, Tohidi M, Sarvghadi M, Delshad H, Amouzegar A, Soldin OP, et al.
on pregnancy outcomes were examined, different results were Management of thyroid peroxidase antibody euthyroid women in pregnancy:
found. This is considered to because by 3 reasons. The first of which comparison of the American thyroid association and the endocrine society
is the difference between the diagnostic criteria, and the charac- guidelines. J Thyroid Res 2013:542692.
[13] Negro R, Formoso G, Mangieri T, Pezzarossa A, Dazzi D,Hassan H. Levothyr-
teristics of the region where the study was conducted was different. oxine treatment in euthyroid pregnant women with autoimmune thyroid
In the meta-analysis is of Kent et al., it was reported that there were disease: effects on obstetrical complications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
differences between pregnancy outcomes when the TSH lower 2006;91(7):2587e91.
[14] Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Lambert-Messerlian G, et al. Maternal thyroid
limit was 2.5 mIU/ml for the diagnosis of subclinical hypothyroid- hypofunction and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112(1):85e92.
ism and when it was 4mIU/ml. The second reason was that the [15] Kianpour M, Aminorroaya A, Amini M, et al. Thyroid-stimulating hormone
effect of TPOAb antibody positivity was not evaluated in most (TSH) serum levels and risk of spontaneous abortion: a prospective
population-based cohor. Endocrinololgist 2019;91:163e9.
previous studies. The third was that iodine deficiency is endemic in
[16] Lee RH, Spencer CA, Mestman JH, et al. Free T4 immunoassays are imperfect
some of the regions where the studies were conducted [29]. during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200(3):260.e1e6.
The strength of the study was that it was one of the first studies [17] Furukawa S, Miyakawa K, Shibata J, Washita M. Women with subclinical
hypothyroidism are at low risk of poor pregnancy outcome in Japan. Tohoku J
to evaluate all pregnancy outcomes of patients with subclinical
Exp Med 2017 Jul;242(3):167e72.
hypothyroidism by as sociating them with TPOAb positivity and [18] Sheehan PM, Nankervis A, Araujo Júnior E, Da Silva Costa F. Maternal thyroid
negativity. disease and preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin
Among the limitations of the study, it can be mentioned that the Endocrinol Metab 2015;100(11):4325e31.
[19] Dimitriadis G, Mitrou P, Lambadiari V, Boutati E, Maratou E, Panagiotakos DB,
Turkish Endocrinology and Metabolism Society's recommendations et al. Insulin action in adipose tissue and muscle in hypothyroidism. J Clin
included the diagnosis of subclinical hypothyroidism if the TSH Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:4930e7.

963
Ü.A. Türker Aras and B. Dinçgez Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 61 (2022) 960e964

[20] Carty DM, Doogan F, Welsh P. Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) >/¼ 2.5 [28] Casey BM, Dashe JS, Wells CE, et al. Subclinical hypothyroid is man pregnancy
mU/l in early pregnancy: prevalence and subsequent outcomes. Eur J Obstet outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105(2):239e45.
Gynecol 2017;210:366e9. [29] Kent NL, Young SL, Akison LK, Cuffe JSM. Is the link between elevated TSH and
[21] Stagnaro-Green A, Abalovich M, Alexander E. American thyroid association gestational diabetes mellitus dependant on diagnostic criteria and thyroid
task forceon thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Guidelines of antibody status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 2021
the American thyroid association for the diagnosis and management of thy- Oct;74(1):38e49.
roid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid 2011;21(10): [30] De GL, Abalovich M, Alexander EK. Management of thyroid dysfunction during
1081e125. pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline.
[22] Chan S, Boelaert K. Optimal management of hypothyroidism, hypo- J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:2543e65.
thyroxinaemia and euthyroid TPO antibody positivity preconceptionad in [31] Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, et al. Guide lines and recommendations for
pregnancy. Clin Endocrinol 2015 Mar;82(3):313e26. laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.
[23] Zhang Y, Wang H, Pan X, Teng W, Shan Z. Patients with subclinical hypo- Clin Chem 2011;57:e1e47.
thyroidism before 20 weeks of pregnancy have a higher risk of miscarriage: a [32] Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the
systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017 Apr 17;(4):12. management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of
e0175708. arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of
[24] Allan WC, Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Williams JR, Mitchell ML, Hermos RJ, et al. the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2013;34:2159e219.
Maternal thyroid deficiency and pregnancy complications: implications for [33] Oppenheimer L. Maternal fetal medicine committee. Diagnosis and manage-
population screening. J Med Screen 2000;7(3):127e30. ment of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;29:261e73.
[25] Cakmak BD, Turker UA. TemurM, UstunyurtE. Pregnancy outcomes of anti- [34] Menon R, Fortunato SJ. Infection and the role of inflammation in preterm
body negative and untreated subclinical hypothyroidism. J Obstet Gynaecol premature rupture of the membranes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
Res 2019 Apr;45(4):810e6. 2007;21:467e78.
[26] Gong LL, Liu H, Liu LH. Relationship between hypothyroidism and the inci- [35] Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very
dence of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016 low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive
Apr;55(2):171e5. technology. N Engl J Med 2002;346:731e7.
[27] Vanden BE, Vissenberg R, Land JA, et al. Significance of (sub)clinical thyroid [36] Di Renzo GC, Roura LC. European association of perinatal medicine-study
dysfunction and thyroid autoimmunity before conception and in early preg- group on preterm birth. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous
nancy review. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22:532e3. preterm labor. J Perinat Med 2006;34:359e66.

964

You might also like