9) LA Word Sint. Siya Bai vb Sitaram Singh (BCE fh. tabs. No- 0/49 °) Foctsot the. Cost. 3 Gn thn mally, ot advocate. withdomo around dram. Cound ah devel omount deposited in avait amd tt wah ‘ot paid to the Camplainant-, ane ob the qnunmbinn ob The dinsplnary cyamitfer. 06 Maahyo pradink Sib, bor counel did rat A dhe. qudgemant | within the Limilation posued under Suction 96B at the Advocals Act 4964 aun Tharudine the cone. Wars Pranstuned to the. an Counc] ob dda. The. Complaint wor bled before The Aincpnasy Camtion ob the Macys eeadvah Stab fan eountil by Smt Sy pai agaiant the suyonlont barat Sui Sita SinghTh Conplaint won hed dhe advocate wan On J by the Conglaimnant tn til ‘many puito pr 43 porvrons and pari The does in Keeution proces a, the ducretl amount wan dapoted whieh War atthdzaum dram ccd by the ronpondont Complaint and he. od nat dunraok the, ammount theraad «7 Fanpondlont advocate aid thet he Aad vat withdrawn the wmaunt ccd the runpondint alo Unfunded thot tke. amount Withdbrawm by Him adjuatid -twando Court kan and cthin exponst with he canbind 0b the Complainant War vat duund Corduct «dp He. opin. 06 hs. dinghy samvatti, the. advocate wah fo ob To Aow ‘much amount Wwal> withdorasun. by Mim and adjusted + ward hin ed. kacled fr obnchange hin busrdon. |= ae =D =D =D aD nea Q6) Spur of te. cores @ whothey dhe Conduct q surpondont amount to tinaneial mip oppreappeiation ? @ Whether the. ewnporolint jn Uoble. tem prabessional aniieondued ? Sudpumant 5 the Dibciplinasy Commitee 06 the Bon cond] o& | rola. deided the ease the, advorak. plaaded that he moun} Ufthdraw war adjusted “foworda ‘the torr due “is hem ond alo fowando cthen oxpinsers but PHuar | go} bound thou and ‘rot actupled ound trcbore, found guilly of preatesdinal mincordutt ton yal sovnainiag (he omuind. He. var ondiaud tr rukuind mum wffhe Cort of Ro BOuDL Within Q marth and the Commie parsed onde tan Aupomdion ton a poruad ot 4 (002. dhe mount of Ad. 2600/- with jnderuot @ 107. prr ged@ “—_)_77_ CoN NO Upincno. D Bhatt vA ; vijay Singh. Kopadion. (BCI Tn. Cabs. No. 49/4993) | Gn thin code am. advocat war givim heavy onmaunt | ton beveral ty sr wonky but he old rut do he. wonk bon which the. mony wae pod fe him, | He eollretid moray on imagine wonko aloo the. odvorat narprndint Suteived Ae 50002 toy the oyptal fo be dled im the amma! Coen cout Duitt bo éilled ogetinata Mr puja. He aho sacsived Kd 22/000/- in. nevebw oppucalion gidgumant by hay ok indnvmor A num of Ro 45,000 - war abo noeeivod by him §0n Caot | oppanite fo the Advocate Cumual a Mohanarheror | and delhe. he. oppallant had nat tiled appa | and Aut inthe lower Caundr . He nimply minuded the, ery and dodronded the tamplatrandh fe .Pru. ob tht Caded @ Whelhey “he naparded advocats guilty {or Committing prabenional aminconduet on nat ? quagemunt> : = Committe hold the nurpordont advocate ee e 4m Committing prabesnioal a ey irdored the nisiking off hia Name tre of advocates tmodrclsinad Ay the Pan Counts Hee Kurthon Mahananhdro and Gra. The. Cammnt i a . didi ee ee oe oo oe yfva Yep Raheja. (BCL Gh. Cass v0.40) 4993) Sense nwt?> drthin one, prodop Narain did complaint butore Adlhi tox Couneil againnt yf Posheja. advocate. ue sunpnndind wan advocate - The sunpondrd aN advorate ading kon complainant in Case. Alan abled hat wwrpendind- handed oven hin 0 targed hy ordi, while. nr ity ord won ky hin obenk. Lodehy dhe nospindint advocate admitted he gave abwunaner -h th complainant had he will Aue to if Thad tutktog Aagpan ti hin i'n police Statin . yp” 7)oy the : : end sunponclint woo guilly of pocdessional lu ae ke. aonpmelant had dorgad Ah orden of the be The Cornmittoe atte oxcuminipg dhe tact, held that dhe swspondint war guilly 6 predesninal mirondutt aka Amnioun witioe. He had bonged the ordan of The Cound: Comoquantlly 1h. biniplnory Commitee indind xemaval o hin Tame dom the sell smatncasnad by the fart Counc of Hulk The tommitien ‘made it ebea dhat mo lense than dha adonanad) punsohmunt could be imposed 09 the pralerional minomdutt way of VOY fusca’ motine,Ayssoed Suarsyy (B02 fr be 63/2967) 4 thin ons the Compliant war addousied “th cheek quatioe. of Allorabed High Court by Suan dbarath Miflol ggainnt Aayoorand Swosoop and hin Sotho Sand Sonor $id 0 out againat He Complaint din neeary of Cartan, mount fon vst ond geeupuckion of Ot. pecamadalion in te. tenancy ob the Canglaind - 3x bhygunt Svanory did and Hin heirv wins. baoypht om sed. The ult wor Leeand espe anf 0 ders wre doaurn. Theaadter dy Svarooy made inderpelalin in th. gudgumurt anol datrur y addetion. the "rad Acad’ 2ithen in hin gun hand- waiting On ctherwiht Carel 1 be doled hose two word «@ whethey He runporcint advocate in quilly 6 praternional muneanducot 2 G uhethey ke rorpendnt odvecads in lind ton punia hunt a mani pulaken ot deer? i The pany commit bound the roryonclont advovats vill. 7 Carnmittoe gndowd bon bun The sonpondant wap ondend “fo pay. aot of fy 3000 F ce the eonplainant ond 4 in cone Ae gailed tu do po within tw maniho, he. would go undiye punptaion toh am addtional fori ot ane yar ths> ¥ > > > > > » , , J ) ) ) ) ) } 23 | Care No.5 Sam, Suds Romi 8 Onh. | vA | Munioh. chomdna, bros] [GCL Th Code. no 43/1996 Fact of the cabes Guthin ews, aopmdlnt odvouah Ajyad an 0. cita¥s | in opseomunt of sale ob a. plot of Lamd old by his | Sathor-in-Law He neeoived Consideration mony hy way | OF Compurmie. dots in eleven ruth Cited by olevem | | Complainant whe hod Condtiwelid pause. on this Plat tHewodtor ‘he rwspmclomt advocated aut} yainat them 409 ‘hein snacin ahauing thorn. a tenant amd he. Mupprubred the. ompreemine. deeroe Pubred by he Cours | Sou. ob te sey Othethoy Hino. cade of granh mincmduet? — | (whether the advocate roupyran the. maitrial tcf | of the dank Compramins. eens ? | (i) whthey she advcate commited Areach of Rule. 35 of the ban Coune;] of Sra? | | ——@ ia | TAL Din cplinar Comnafter 06 the Pat counes] ob dhdin. bold he sinpndont advevats quill of pretesion aninenduch: The CommPtioe ordered that the leone practiva wold be nuopindad Lan 9 youn .he Connatioe aloo ondined a num, o€ Ro Anata 0 be pad Ls cao of the, Complainta » Ay the suopendint advacole wilkin 0 peried of two smontha , Sailing ahich,, hia | Leymen went, fo be uopided (vr a dobtion fied ok ore Ybor.nn & | OM No | fpabu. Lal | v, Suk qain [Cr Tn. cobs. NO» 445/199] | Gn thin case the Camplainant waa am advocate, He | alliged that the sxapmdont advocate waa 0. poaching | |lauyen a9 wall a9 working a am aden pride and | | publiohen of wauely fa] Ki qomaca.! Thru, eAacyes | | wou trarmed againak him Finot, of the. Fime of his Jugintration aA OM advooats , he oid nat dlinclone that ho wan owen, publiohen , prince ard ody ob OO weakly "Aa Ki val.” Stead, 00 atton supitnain a om advocate he ured 40 Work av a publoker, priver and edn ob akirenaid oor Tard change ogainot Kim wan thet ke waa posal sngeged in then busing) .mo hon he wan am awa, publiahorr pinto ond ( thethan he wan ford in othen busi? (oy) whafhor he con ke a a poster eniowwnduey under tule» 36 0% the Advocat. Act? udp | The Aovipinany comnttlec held him gull ot prod enriaal mhoemduet under Suatin 95 06 Ad vacolts Act, A964 ond sunpindint advocate wae UO drum prachce don dhe ppried of one yan nom the dite of runvice of fla. ede sy him «ie. aa 1 andy aa to Coot(37) | CObL Not | Sante Uneile, Mave | VA Gita Hom Singh [BES Br cade NO» 4] 1987) | Eacla the cade 7 | thin oat Compliant ar mony ar | ud myintad undo te, orgy Londorg Ad. Bhe | gaged dhe sungondint, Advert nam Si Sita Rom yap hay Cannel bor bil qnony Auilo againot | ' | ho, boro and en as haul Se » | paid the advocats count dun, cauynns| bear and other > expunnn. Th. Complanard alge hab the. > | ndyouste used o widnads datneta] manpy /motndo > | bam the Caltita doom inet tine wiht te > [eam ond Aral of fe Complainant. sritially > in kia unctlum shite mint the advocate odmitied ¢ | that he had tuithdbawn tke amount, and > | thereatte in ovmonded abate ment he dented it : Ge tke vind of the tdmicnion hae or the | advocate “h prove shat he hod tut withdraur the | > * amounta0 Sue toy | Owhethor ‘he edvavati used to eithdrow docu | Omounty dam the Cavorlo Gram-fime th tiene without ks content and dae. ob th. Complainant on nef? whether th. advocate Aad withdrawn the amour | On ut 7 didpumanty The Committed that the osyndant Aca | tutthhawn fa 40000} in all amd fhowgore, he | ohauld poy thio cmaund the Complainant withtra piood of thd muntho- eens en the Committee held that nto the vob that uta Mo S00 wuld be. poi | dhe. raynndamt , Advocate within. one Marth datltsy which he And to Undirgo uopeorion $ah OL (yao: |3 Cade NOG Seen tasy, Kanmoctake khadt Gram ud Sampskio Sangha vh iS Kulkosmi [BCL Tn. Code NO- 42/4990] The mabhy wor sinbt broysht baton the. Karrnoctaken Sto. gon counesl but Hf could aot be dinpobtd of within the provouibal ahlony podd ond thowcbone.7t wah ranstined to “he as eosner] of Sadia dh thin ooh complaint engaged the reaped Advocate, J+ KulkannT Sen siling txeearhom procucinge inthe. Canplant nu ord Ae, had sceuived ditkount cumuunte ‘punrda the deeretal amount in diktount txeeution proce but he old rut py the whole. Omaunt | pth Complainant: Te complainan? wah puceprtul | in pravig shad atten hamg ongoaid the seonpndnt ta puprusint him in dhe execution prncanlg asi auf | at decor againok tha. gudgumant debheig he necevored | but The mi amuunt war rut paid Fo the Complainant. ia a eeet inant on nel ? @ whether 4 ad vocste guilt ob hoviby Cammttted prodeadional mintenduct on nal ? aig The. conmitfer. held the. advooatt guilly a having camnited pratunsinal inereduet awd ondoned thod he be raupindad ter daa practien 401 0 posi o& one oan dum {ue dati of te. Reclpt ob the andl The. Canna tee drbaxred him brom proc dog in any court on bebo any utter oh prion during 1 pocid. of ounpinrven.@ Cade 0.3 Mas. mes padwondhan vA vay. Kanmankan [Cl Br abe o-93/4994T ty thin Cahn. the. Complaint datidad + purchase 100 cous a Lond though 0 noal rite ogomt So udorokig an ogpeulinal clvclaprant poulect by Siang % Cooptratie patie. The Camplafnant angoyed the ronpndont advocati ton campltng tM TeUDNOrG ly ton malitios. He war poi Wy 245,000 ir He. junclase Lond bung dh /nyyiotratien changes amd ofhen eaponbi «The tuspolint «in Ope othe ranpost, od of sandy tho oteount cand cal nut poy the. balomee amount biog With Mim. | Ghtlly the mopar adc oid that le | had rateived the noid amount but ultimately » oF the nage of tvidlmee aditied that tr all he guceived fos 9/46,000 62am tM. Complainant ee he| @ ow ok te cay | © whether the. neopmdont odvocate poy tHe balance. mount pg wth. hin afl. Complainant nt * @ So the swymalent advovale emuniad that he hod | Heenived te olmaunt on rut ? Tepes | The Commitee helo! the rwoponclont Advocati quill | ok quubesdinal, mintanduet ond ordeal tad the | swppondinda Uiegnie. to prothite be purpinded 0m 5 youn and ovo ordered the advocate to rebund Ao.¥3, 600/- uit indenunt @ 40m per anni. 4 owe te neud amount uaa Tat guunded . hin Licones. to procter tag to 4 furdhen AUMP: ton an add:tional proved of 5 yar and ont of Aa. dpe | tuna inpnned on the sung Avoca@ | Case No. 40 | Allahabod Sank ema [el tr cass wo. 49/1993.) vs Grivanhe praand du thin oobe 1h. complainant (Al.habod hank) biled | Complaint gga he. odvecats Crnoh pradsed Verma | on minagpropruahan of cant fe. and aloo $1n vt | lg caben.ft cur ale that 50 puifo Mon nt sugiofad ap ‘ine agpicalond $0% wont of poymant ok rape Cunt Seo aut o&-62 and tuo & theauito weve divminiad 4on tant of poymunt ob nod tw), ode out of 52 0uiln thio auto bow. til af all. he. advovite amioayptaprslid 4h. Aum paid th him by he Complainant oy fhe porpone ot caw tind, 2tC- $ way allyed that the advoodte had minappeptiated | Frode b intel «Th. Complaint altined | fay the nelund of Ha. atrenaid Um and pryd boy tokey afte ayprapriade acim qgindt hin | mineorduct . | ttheMss cols iA {oun gull $07 rd ok pp spriokin of Cova dex. on 11 3 tiligg the todo onral 7 () whofkey the. advocate Sunent > “the Comuntlen bald the. advocate. guilly of prabessianal aninemduseh The Camitfee ordined on the ppiekg oft fhe name ob the advocate Sram the gall 0 Up fan counei] and sugund the amount a6 1, Aly 144 LE Count bees goalined albgeth dhe. inlewat @ 9h por annum and Coot ob Ka. 45, 000/-a ay) Regional addin, Alla knbad Bank vb Jip Srivadtova [BCL Tr. Code MO- 30/4995] | aed Oy Gatien oan tha Compl tan Filed by the Alakobed | Bank ogainht Sat. Jef spevertava and Shad Nana ‘Lol Ginko, advocales ‘nakiy the eligi that the runpmdint No.4 wan we by the Bank 09 0% advocae tin the puryode ot ti ff) nuit on fo Behold in evil | Canty at Lokhimgon Khu bon enduchy puch vabL» and dot all chy nineelonumn Honk but Ae rninnpprapniatid the Qwunt €a0o amd prskenicnl dws oc. muedivad Gram the omk and he od ‘rat tile any Cape inthe. Court ard tahe. suprodinded abst hoving tiled the nutla and aloo about the dats o herby. $f owe abo ally Had hone OOM) vine tiled with rramial Count bau while Me jaeuived dull cart dan Gram the. bank. He atho orgad The niga at the branch Managur”) on dikberunt applealinds and oftidavil pubuited In the Court gm ..4p) He bin} dahe éonmation-b the branch d4andhg ihe ppugman ob he Sut and dite of Renny He wag satubed cy sehrn to the bank orighal | pypen given. to him &o1 tilty in dhe Cova | whith, Woe nab nt tied. He alno Heatonod to “dot jhe gol ende i wth. Rin in UD “the Crnglainaed bank poteded qgoindt him. ft ua ao olla that rabpnt N02 voit the | rignalunmn of He Banke Mang Manapor Sunged by sth. nuspodint Not. and Ae need. in eollurion with and aided and abetted the, oct ob the surpondind Nod The, above ablygotonh » Wi proud fo the noliotnetin of the. dinctplnary Committe. «The Complainant bank udhoned Auge. Lous by dhe act ok the ranponclindnhethor the. advocate minogprapialed dhe Count 8D and prabsovinal Lun op-nut ? : (© whether the advocate. dorged dhe pipeline. af The Branch, Manager) on at ? (i) helen fhe advoc thnuxterad fe dideyy he wpa suture Aypg eth, hin fh. tab. Conplatrant bomk. guscud agoinat him on nal 2 judgumnts The comarfehald the sunpmdint Noa. quill of prabessio) mivernduch «The Commit pubs osidey bon dubanry He. ronpmdimt: oA brum preaeriofhy nyo. a art advocate Th. Camnitlc.drueed that his name be sumoved trom the reall of os Counec! ok Usp. The Committee held Thorebor. that Ko. 4/9 40,495 > hock rivaypeapsitled by he nopmdint N0v4 and thoukore he waa sequined 4 wudund the name tr the Bank tihin. & pried ob amonth. The Commiftee ole hald that the Bank could dle. €or Componsoction bar lead Cauded 0 it by the act of the responclondaat. kunknonaj Gronwani vA viahworath 8 mukartkay [D-¢ Appeal No-40 ez The Complainant engaged “te. appallamt advocate an his Counas| fo bile mutt in the Bord: High court. on oct diftorumt tines by he. appellant advocate he paid 29-00 supa in-total but dhe. advacati. olelayed in siligg the nuit and did nop poy tull cour 40. He. aloo daloyed in travipg intigdm application and dete thin he Pouthoned huge lors. Tha. Binretp inasy Committee ot the Prot Counc! of Mohanashtra amd Goa. Sound Aim guild 8on olaloyi tilisg ok nuit and held him guilty o& pratensieral ee and impeded puniohanant ai owapanrsion of come, for thous yoaurr j The. anf advocate. ella dha Dai cf i umer| 0 Mohonadhbra ‘oe He challenged dreinion o6 the Dee of Barr Co and Cron botar The fan coumeil ob sha daonion on the ground that thos hoo boo grad) violation a6 the prineiplos ok natural guohee (1995)“at then (ufinashdd - a of the. appellant that show. had boon alti of fla. psincpld of rofural justo bf rut alloupg hin prayer on odjounnnnt wan Tut ollowed the. Avid Cemmiten bound that the appellant odvocats old af dapnott dhe. ontine. Cound tend amaunt mre date of tily of fle. platné or immediately therwadden havipg ected money bor that punpude drum the Camplatront and Ft und pail at V buloded age aapteahl ofl pr meheod 4 dkoampogmant dom dhe. Comp snambucf? Omaunted cha. protossionl ninvondel rhe appulont odvexals tno Saud Heat Ry dhe Commit thot Av Aad sududed fo Saturn. back Ae. pap tr the Complainant on fhe. pend that he wan to get deer and axpun» boom hin.thay phone had baum rsd vidlodim 06 fhe panel wrk. on rt ? ent The dinciplinary comattiaa. of the BM esunel] of ods, ald im gully tox commit pretensions anintanduth an Ae od Tut give ahjeehion MO avn odteh domand being qd. by fie Camplatrat However taking into Cnbidlruation dhe ela and dineumMtomend the Aiotiph many commits, 06 the. Bax eaumell ot ida qnobihied the puniohndnt won ded by fhe an Counel| ab mahoteaoh tn ton. The. oppellont advocate war ruppinarded tor ruck Conduct» The. plnvokmurt of nuapinsin 6 hin bomen. 6 9 youn lise net anid. ond mod died te the ulind above He wor Wan dhe Committee. in future Ae 44 phauld Carminf ong Pe ob prabooiral mincanduct.| ca @ Viknamoditya. Sant. sani khatoon. ['D.C appeal no.24/499 J His on apptal against she. dasision. of the disctplenany Cormeen of the U.p. fan coumel] By the Aoid ond the Binciplnosy conmitex of the.Ban caune] of UrP- Duapunded the. advocat ton a poriod of bive yeand. dykes tobe the appellant, advocate got He Negraliine of the Complainant of blomk wate, marked Paper. The Complainant handed over to him, bir Counsel, The | asiiginal hale ded bon mutation ‘The. appellant okd nat dale the. ructaton nut. He €Tled a. nuit on behalf ot hin tathap , Ma» Thoolan. yas against Sm, Jaurilo Khatoon benam? transaction ond the sual olumey wan hin todhyy Thoolon yada He. minubed the vataladrama and lank popor "ined by the Complainant and kiled Compuypudl aml obtain. a Campromise deena in davon of hin Sather Jhoolam yada. The. ova inal “bole handed voy to him. by the Complainant twan ales minused . The Hineslinary Committee —_— -found thad appellant advocate war acting a adyocote of the Complainant, dharma. Khatoan. drm earlier Paint of time St wap alo Sound that re. wa the Coumrel in the. operation ond exceuction. of the pale. dood in daveurr of dhe Complainant which. war oxeeutod ly Shad. Ram Aha , the. oumey of the Lamd. SH wap alo Sound that the amp pope kon dhe atonraid Auli deod war purchased thowh the appellamt advocate tha Ae wan ‘rat involved in the ole oleed wap ound by the Aintiplinagy Comnitter Totally innocent. Soo of te coy G whether the odvovati. got the ignite of the. | Camplaiant on. blank voxalatnama amd blank water Trashed poprnn 651 nat | @ whether the oppellant tile the mutation Aut onal? | | phi| the iseiplinary comitier of fhe Aan enune ob Grdia bald that Yu. oppllant evn quill a the probesdinal misemduet of serious malune ard he (yan sightly puminked by the Aintipinayy Committee of the Ban Count! of UP hy Audpami'yin (vam. proche an a pool of tive yeas rAhowgh qmape, VO pununkmant Could be imponod Yon him.ugi Nanoin mishnsc 3 ond. [Civil Agal 0.1224 (4998) Sere ey Gn ths cade 0 coumel forthe. pork insidted that the card Ahoull| fake on Seeond Compromise ond ft betwen poten in the abstmee ob his cbynt appara edermumtal b kis ents infowsh the Counse| wad in pobreddsion of, o blo) ‘vakalochnama cud blank papon both gy the. Complainant Tin, oeumint vee. hed. the Coun! 0% bobsicatiy a. Compania. petition where. by the Caplainamt Colum) had bem made to bubber & deen bon oviehon. The Complainant groved the Gate Ban Council Complainigy 0 the protesrionl mintarduutt. The Gate Bar Caunes] made cevinion against the Comploinan! He preabustad appoal to ‘he. a3} eaunerl of Solo. under Seekin 37 ob the Advacctes Aol 1964 The. an Council of Indiasilo ial Cuhellen dhe daewumend Uded Ay the caumde! bor dabocenting 0 Comyseumiat petition 07 not ¢ 9 thethor opplant han Cammited probesnional ? etl 66 Seal justi in amhanteg i ining the. oppollant an hoa and to tile o saply & qudpemunt 7 “the Suprunme. Count ob Counctl of froia, cam umhameod dhe punishinent jmponod by The Qt, Bast Counet] re appeal 97 06 the advooalis Aet, but bebore dairg AY if must give neormrable opportunity ob Aoasting hb tha. advocate that ip the. caeesmed advocate lio. hald that the. Aora ruadorable | him to Aka canbe why he quik imposed by the Sinks bat Counc?) be nat gnhanead abtor giving him doze opportunity ob filing 4 neply ‘Than beasts him toum the. fon council eguld hove, hald that the, gneneine hy the fon Counti] pawn fo vary the pontnes.t6 the proiudkix. 06 the appellant sassroble opportunity ob bale hana thus fhe demndonee. atuonded by the Shite Pan Coune’| ua ping x. appillant: bam practice kon a pov of dru yon tao upphald and wwntored and she ory od the fan aun] ok Sri ony dant oh tnhanting the pumiokamard cura Met ovide. le amen uallillnal7 @) Smt.» pomka,jam. v~ | oH. Chandrarhekhan [Bet fr. Case. NO- 96/4992] | ela ob the cose» | The Complainemt, Mn. ponkajoum, tiled a Complaint | | gaint the xeagondant mH chandsohhekhay | “an hon eouns| to delond hor ir a puit which. | tuo 7d against hen dam vacating fhe house, by ‘the londlond in the. Court of Arnall, CaUs0d the Lruspndamt peantiad to bight te. tase and avruned that Ae tuould atlind the Cade . he aha absurd hon that Aho wowld Tet be cbntunbed and. Ake wld not ba Jsquiind 4 afind 1h. Cad. me day awry at the Aude Come With Aamo albiiah and tviction orden and get Aen howe. notated . She allgad dhod- Ake Luts Net infirmed by the suspondimt about the Aame and Ae lid ma} abtind fhe. protecdings and the cake uaa leeided ox- ponte Ay the, Covset gee___ yu. ob 7 ] OT dteinion of the advecat fo ret opposed in dhe Cound tar Or international and dalibenode Act. () The. Dttiojon & the Bor cyumel| in avr debatable Coney - gudpmant 7 The. commit. held The psd At guilly of pratesrional 7 posed hak he ba nupended trom paves dora “ at two yearn ium ok the onder. she date of the, commu or || Coke 4g | gohn. 8'Sou30. vh Eduuond Ani [vil Ayal wo. 3266 14993] facta ob the cay | The punpanclyn} ‘made. 0. complaint of protssrional anuntanduct to the Karmataha Stile an caumet] alliging ‘aha the appellant an. advecte ths had cbted ‘thew of Aa late amotlon-in-Laws amd had Kept F# in hin hot turtody 06404 antoy it in hia Xopintey of tuilh and giving & 2atup hod Gat setuomd tho will in Apite of wnttion requir. ff an tunihey abled that thon the ray fauyp Sor he drhsin quod the appellant dem Ake cil he nied Aovieg it, and | thew.atfe the. dobtadix tor obligad he take. onathey | ail| 0 Gf in the. dudly at the. advocate h giving Aave Qubtody fo the decumunt Ohick in given by hi (he. advocads clacs nat ref the doewmont ty the. eon an he in bound fo uur. thom an demand and the, od votate byaaoh the bust ot the bond. pL, tha. Ghols Ban Come) exereraled the appellant > but on oppal y pwypondind he. Bas caunetl ok | Sedio. held the opplont jet ok pradrioral | qineorduet ond anyardad hin the punlohanord ot junpinsion Cram proce in ome oar, TAL | oppullont theaupm prttoced the proosnt oppeal[De Appeal Wo. AA. ,A2, 4/2000] eee My the Boek of all those. oppoalr wore. Conmmant » thy Woe heard crgethor- dn thi tabs the Complaint againet The appllant advocars. tua that he wa nat Amgoged 99 am adveeat, wan that he wo’ aol angagod a On advoonts by the canplainant buf he nolced the work ose and Ahsaigh bogus eprobtim the eamplainant and abot don othe» whe applied bon imhanend Campondartion sachin QeA ad The Land Aequinition. Act, 4849 .) & see (whether fhe appellant cheaded Ke complainantn | aud othr adbeeled person 67 nut? | tkethon the appellant oalvocate guilty 6 | prokerrioal rinconduct on rat a qudpument > | The dineiphnany Comnfftar 06 the 3051 counei] 08 | gro ound him quill ot pratessional ainemduet © cand hele! that appellant adiyocalen Tame be | jrormoved trom the. sulk of the. Ban enumesl of mahanasta and C.0d » The Committee. 2100 Ore fhe oppilland- advacate 7 PAY cunt.Soxuma oy A — Palam. prabad Shasmoh ae [evil Appeal 1v0- 1938/2000] Gn thin east, the appellant waa 0 prachoirg ab preactionsy in the Cauoct ob Bhopal. Aten anvalling Fidel fr the, Shute Ban Counei] of Maclya pradesh. Stat, Croperatve Bank in 4990 the. Bank Canfnuia) He fo suet hin. in that copactl He an’ obo engaged by th, noid bank * conclyet thease fn thith the ank an a porpy. Howe, the nail taltiomalap oid nat ramatn Lane her he fon sweyutted Kim tr tr all te case is salting to Ah. Bonk Soe ob ehomigg ther. the. odio founrded 0 eonneiditd amount of Ro 97,400h Wh the balance poyoble by the hank Fowarda the. lol sumunusalin which he ia© and on payment af fas hee Jatll Satur the. conse Fils. © whether the advocate can hove o Iron on the "| Cetpgeetion. paper endowed “fo him by Wis OM porligg Fur 7 @ Boon the. advocat hove violated The of the. Gediam Coninoct Act 12727 Je ae The & court upheld the. decision of the root Coumet| of rola Dinciplinary committer hold that the advocate wor guilty of prapersional aninconduct amd nuspendod him Prom practise fy a pood of 1¢ ‘mento with payment of RO oop p ar Fine - Soeton 474) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ose Wo. 49 - | In fit Vingy chandaa minha [ondemp} putition. Criminal vo.’ of 49941] flo ote | dr this cose om advorat wunp found guilly of | exininal conlomyt of Count amd he wor Atatun to wrdbygo. imple. inprssorement din 0. pried of 6 wurk8 and aunprded ram. practinig an an. advocate | don a pusiod of thse Yoon 1 The. pun mond of | | impuioonmrent war nusprnded ona period of four ‘years od wa to be activated in cose of fis | Conviction of Ou other offemee. of Condeanpt of ‘count within the. dad pusiod do this cose the taunt had held that the licrner. of a advovati +a proctioe yal prop Dion. may be duxpinded comer by fhe. Suppeme | Court in the COL of vinoy chardia Mninhna | m thin potat hor bum. averpuled in thin “| ee7 of Suypume. Count Ban Asnociatim vA Union of Sola, the Suprame court har ‘mode 74 eloay Thad the liewnes of ane advocate 40 proche | Carita be puiginded on vanetlcl fn the Ororise | of the Contempt Juscadiction . | vue of the obey | |) whethor the Supanns. caved com take Cognizant | | of Conmpt oP High Cound? (whether the, Seared judge could be Aummoned don examination 40. voufp Ah incidint givin. by Kim. ah pains dhe Candumen? (i) do the advocate quily ff. axocine of Contempt jusundietion ? 6) dove the. Anil 429 of Hs cntitiin of duck iad sustrcted on rat ? | | gg lll@ Deymet7 a “Tho Cound halo that the Leone. of om advocati ‘to practise. Iyol profession may bt nuspaded 07 | Canela by the. Suptume. cru or High Cou fr The oxereine of the Camomyt juosndictionws Ja} Aoluost [es Tr. vo. 66/4999 ] fan of ety The. nonpondlint advocate hurled the shoes and Ahold logan int, Supe Count of Sain: fon thin Centompt of Cwod he was punished by the Suprume count, His apology &va dinallowed by the Cound and he War puninhed tulth The Aumenes. to mete dimple fmpruinonmont fy du annthy ond 4 Pay n Fra of 2000 ups. Sh C08 of default in poymunt of Fine he woh undogo 0 Furth Atmnple. Imprdsamununt of to months, His cenduet omaunted cust onky ‘he Contompt af cunt buf avo profesrimal minenduet. The fan Coumetl of the Moharwrkina and eo intial proudly apsint Kim cmd it wal panolind that Hhow wap pina fate Sunda tOsinks wand Lal Alvan hol | “peafessional. and then mth corde she Hu. ban Coun of Suda. ondined the J obs fobs ode. oven to td. inca cant of Ber fon expend olapeal thoutt- Sos oft i 7 dh the advocate cannnited broaoh of pra esioaal mincrduct 1@ dh the odvavate quill Advocate Att 4964 7 udpment 7 “the dincipinay commit of Ban Cound] of Grdin. hold him guts é professional aninemaluet and sndoud shat Kn mame. ba rtd POM sta, yall malic By ta, Bane Cau of mahonashtna om Crone He hall aut be sntitled 4p practise 4or all the tine came before any Cound autharily on puro if Section 35 of theCNL NO. 24. — Hikmat Als Khar MM Shur prasad Arye 3 07- ~— Feevil Apolo 240/ 4986) Faetorei fs ft dn this dare rospondint nod adbaulted hin apponant in dha. coun Soom of arumif mugind rat, witha knife a pistol Ahot iA aho Aid fo have boon #inad by Pim of the time ef the ineidumt, He Was praneeurad fo offemens und Section 307 of th. Sadan penal Code ond Seetion 25 of the Asm Act oid wah Aurduneed to tundngs Higa ous inpinomand oy Ahsan yoanh on the offtmes. undiy Seetin 407 Shion pial Code and 409 Tine rmartbs 40m oflenen. umdin Section 25 of the Army fe. The High Cust maintained the hendaner under Seckim 25 of Aram Act-Acfune At could be armored, 0 Lottery frum the reScere minty of home. Up Lucknow tas sccived nunpondlg the Canvictin and Artiole ae of fhe Consttchen Fill foray ord Addrtional Dintviet ond Session judge, dont 0 Complaint and due. Cabs 0-70 of 1984 ws lodged fon wig Foiged ard fabudnted datumunt in the Cound ta get wid of the Conviction Under Seekon 404 of the ddan ponal ead and two yoann nurpemaion frm proche nn ondind | which war det side by th Bas Counc of ida | | odin dotid 36.04.1964 | Hila Ali khan. had abo nubmitied & wut which wan rumbaed a Acs Cade NoGa of 1983- Se the had cost puspondunt often 4iltyg writin obinund did nah appt ard UP fan coun puntid OF poste and dound the adyoosle guilfy of profemsinal minemduce and thse Yours ouoporen Fuam prochine ag | | forded - Lia.Apral and (rads-appeal tan filed. The advo Caneornad prayer fon poling pide tls. puniohmsnt whanea) Complainant proyed umavel of nome. 6 The. advocate permaninihy Shea the tall of of Srdio in vio & wolioy The Pan Counetl in appeal fc. appeal No-4 | onde 08.06.4984 pursed | of 49¢2. ollawed the aypial ef caneenned advocate | cnd aye oyrbd by Ah Consnant va dimmipad - the Complainant thin filod opptal heft The | | How Cuprume, cunt of . oun dh ey Dole the ach ae one. by 1M appellant peohessi onal Advocate tamtancunt amgunt 1 gnineumduet undo Section 35° of the Advocal vs At AV6LE@ swipe 9 “Tho. Suprame. Covsct held Prhunss prored quill df profesrional avocmduet and det odide the onder oP tha lneaplnesy Cammite. of the fac esuneil of Sadia The Count Ondarad 1h suumaval of hdd rang fom fram the, Shake Sell of fhe advocate.