Jun 2004
Jun 2004
25, 2018
SAE TECHNICAL
PAPER SERIES 2004-01-1974
400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 U.S.A. Tel: (724) 776-4841 Fax: (724) 776-5760 Web: www.sae.org
Downloaded from SAE International by Brought to you by the University of Kansas (Technical reports: 1998 to Present), Saturday, August 25, 2018
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of SAE.
SAE Permissions
400 Commonwealth Drive
Warrendale, PA 15096-0001-USA
Email: [email protected]
Fax: 724-772-4891
Tel: 724-772-4028
ISBN 0-7680-1319-4
Copyright © 2004 SAE International
Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE.
The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper. A process is available by which discussions
will be printed with the paper if it is published in SAE Transactions.
Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for presentation or publication by SAE should send the
manuscript or a 300 word abstract of a proposed manuscript to: Secretary, Engineering Meetings Board, SAE.
Printed in USA
Downloaded from SAE International by Brought to you by the University of Kansas (Technical reports: 1998 to Present), Saturday, August 25, 2018
2004-01-1974
Control
H H
Unit
Ethane H C C H
F
Methane H H H H
Natural Gas
EGR Control Valve H
0.98 mol% H H H H
(13A) H
Controller Exhaust C C C H
Flow Meter Pin Tin P Tex Unit THC
H
Meter H H H
Air Surge
F Tank
NOx
Meter
Flow
Operator
Dynamo Combustion
Meter Chamber Figure 2 Composition of natural gas (13A)
Equivalence Ratio
0.4 80< K
Air only c <9 0
Air only %
70< K
60< K c <80%
Firing 0.35 Firing 0.35 0.3 c <70
%
Kc <
60 %
0.2
Misfiring
Air only Air only
0.1
Intake Temperature K
10 150
Knocking 0.55 Knocking 0.55 Natural Gas (13A) / Air
8 100 Tin=430K Pin=0.1MPa Misfire
6
50 H =18.8 Jexegr =0% Firing
4
Experiment Knocking
0
2 Air only
Air only
0.6
0 -50 Knocking
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
Crank Angle deg Crank Angle deg
0.5
Kc <95%
Equivalence Ratio
Equivalence Ratio
Experiment Knocking Natural Gas
1.4 0.45 13A / Air
Tin=430K
1.3 K c<90% 0.4
80< Pin=0.1MPa
1.2 0.3 Ne=800rpm
H =18.8
1.1 0.2 Jexegr =0%
Knocking Experiment
1 0.1 Misfiring
Equivalence Ratio
Intake Temperature K
430
13A / Air
0.8 I =0.45
420
0.7 Pin=0.1MPa
%
K c <95 Ne=800rpm
0.6 90< 410
% H =18.8
K c <90 Jexegr =0%
0.5 80< 400
%
0.4 K c <80 Experiment
70< 390 Misfiring
<7 0 %
Kc
0.3 60< %
K c<60 Natural Gas
Natural Gas
External EGR Rate %
19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 H =18.8
10 6.3
I =0.50 Experiment
0.45 0
8 0.40
0.30
6 0.20 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
0.00 Crank Angle deg
4 Figure 9 Autoignition timings, timings of peak heat release
and combustion durations
2
Rate of Heat Release J/deg
0 equation;
2500 I=0.50 -50
2000
0.45 Vair _ 0 Vair _ egr
0.40 J exegr u 100 ( 2)
0.30 Vair _ 0
1500
1000
0.20
Vair _ 0 : Air flow rate without EGR
500 0.00
Vair _ egr : Air flow rate with EGR
0
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
Crank Angle deg The intake temperature is constant at any external EGR
Figure 8 Profiles of in-cylinder gas pressure, rate of heat release rate. As the external EGR rate is increased, the
and in-cylinder gas temperature for various equivalence ratios knocking limit and misfiring limit moves to high
equivalence ratio. At an external EGR rate of 0%, the
from 0.1MPa to 0.14MPa, the range of the combustion combustion efficiency of over 90% is obtained at the
efficiency of over 90% is expanded. As the intake equivalence ratio of about 0.45, and the knocking
pressure further increases, it becomes narrower. commences at the equivalence ratio of about 0.525. If
Downloaded from SAE International by Brought to you by the University of Kansas (Technical reports: 1998 to Present), Saturday, August 25, 2018
Autoignition Temperature
1072±22K
Influence of I Influence of Ne Influence of Tin Influence of Pin Influence of Jexegr
1100
Pin=0.10MPa
I=0.35 Ne=1200rpm Jexegr =16%
1090 0.20 0.12MPa
In-Cylinder Gas Temperature K
1060
410K
1050
1040
3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa
Figure 10 P-T diagrams for various equivalence ratios, intake temperatures, intake pressures and external EGR rates
the external EGR rate is increased to 40%, the range of pressure. It is lengthened by increasing external EGR
combustion efficiency of over 90% is increased. At an rate.
external EGR ratio of 50%, the combustion efficiency of
over 90% is obtained from equivalence ratio of about 0.9 Figure 10 shows the autoignition temperatures. When
to equivalence ratio of about1.2. the in-cylinder gas temperature reaches 1072r22K, the
autoignition of natural gas (13A) occurs regardless of
AUTOIGNITION TIMING AND COMBUSTION equivalence ratio, intake temperature, intake pressure,
DURATION – Figure 8 shows the profiles of in-cylinder external EGR rate and engine speed.
gas pressure, rate of heat release and in-cylinder gas
temperature for various equivalence ratios at a constant EMISSIONS OF CO, THC, CO2 AND COMBUSTION
of intake temperature of 430K, intake pressure of EFFICIENCY – Figure 11 and 12 show the in-cylinder
0.1MPa, engine speed of 800rpm and external EGR rate maximum gas temperatures, in-cylinder maximum gas
of 0%. As the equivalence ratio becomes higher, peak pressures, combustion efficiencies and emissions of
values of in-cylinder gas pressure, rate of heat release THC, CO, CO2 for various equivalence ratios and intake
and in-cylinder gas temperature are increased. The heat temperatures. The HCCI engine is operated at very lean
release duration becomes shorter with proportional to air/fuel mixture due to very rapid heat release. The low
the equivalence ratio. combustion temperature is related with low NOx
emissions, but the combustion temperature becomes too
Figure 9 shows the autoignition timings THig, the timings low to oxidize the fuel completely. The main sources of
of peak heat release THmax and combustion durations as THC emission are crevices, boundary layer and bulk
a function of crank angle and the time after compression quenching. The CO emission is generated mainly by the
start for various equivalence ratios, intake temperatures, incomplete oxidation of the fuel. In this study, the NOx
intake pressures and external EGR rates. The emission was below 50 ppm at any experimental
autoignition timing is defined as the crank angle when conditions. As the equivalence ratio is increased, the
the integrated value of heat release rate reaches 1% of THC emission becomes higher with proportional to the
the fuel energy supplied. The end timing of combustion fuel quantity supplied until autoignition commences. At
THend is defined as the crank angle of intersection of heat equivalence ratio more than 0.25, it is reduced with
release rate of 0J/deg and tangential to hold maximum increasing equivalence ratio. The CO emission
slope (negative gradient) in heat release rate profiles. increases with increasing equivalence ratio at once. As
The crank angle to occur autoignition and peak heat equivalence ratio further increases, it is decreased. The
release are advanced with increasing equivalence ratio, CO2 emission, in-cylinder maximum gas temperature, in-
intake temperature and intake pressure. These are cylinder maximum gas pressure and combustion
delayed by increasing external EGR rate. But the efficiency become higher with increasing equivalence
combustion duration is shortened with proportional to the ratio. In the case of intake temperature variation, the
equivalence ratio, intake temperature and intake THC emission is reduced with increasing intake
Downloaded from SAE International by Brought to you by the University of Kansas (Technical reports: 1998 to Present), Saturday, August 25, 2018
In-Cylinder Maximum
In-Cylinder Maximum
Gas Temperature K
Gas Temperature K
Tin=430K Pin=0.1MPa
Ne=800rpm H =18.8 Ne=800rpm H =18.8
Jexegr =0% Experiment Jexegr =0% Experiment
2000 2000
Knocking
1500 1500
Misfiring
In-Cylinder Maximum
1000
In-Cylinder Maximum
1000
500 10 500
10
8 8
6 6
Combustion Efficiency %
Combustion Efficiency %
4 4
2 2
0 0 100
100
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
1.6 1.6
THC %
1.2 1.2
THC %
0.8 0.8
0.4 0.4
0 1 CO % 0 1
0.8 0.8
CO %
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
6 0 6 0
CO2 %
CO2 %
4 4
2 2
0 0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 390 400 410 420 430
Equivalence Ratio Intake Temperature K
Figure 11 Emissions of THC, CO, CO2, combustion efficiencies and Figure 12 Emissions of THC, CO, CO2, combustion efficiencies
in-cylinder maximum gas temperatures and in-cylinder maximum gas temperatures
for various equivalence ratios for intake temperatures
temperature. The CO emission shows the same trend the equivalence ratio is over 0.4 and the intake
with equivalence ratio variation. The CO2 emission, in- temperature is over 410K, the CO emission is reduced
cylinder maximum gas temperature, in-cylinder to 0.1% and the combustion efficiency is over 90%.
maximum gas pressure and combustion efficiency
increase with proportional to intake temperature. When
Natural Gas (13A) / Air
Natural Gas (13A) / Air
Tin=430K Pin=0.1MPa
I =0.45 Pin=0.1MPa
2500 Ne=800rpm H=18.8 2500 Ne=800rpm H =18.8
Jexegr =0% Experiment Jexegr =0% Experiment
2000 Combustion efficiency is over 90% 2000 Combustion efficiency is over 90%
In-Cylinder Gas Temperature K
In-Cylinder Gas Temperature K
500 500
Start of Compression Start of Compression
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa
Figure 13 P-T diagrams for various equivalence ratios Figure 14 P-T diagrams for various intake temperatures
Downloaded from SAE International by Brought to you by the University of Kansas (Technical reports: 1998 to Present), Saturday, August 25, 2018
Combustion Efficiency %
Ne=800rpm H =18.8 Pin=0.1MPa Ne=800rpm
Experiment H =18.8 Jexegr =0%
100
Experiment
80 Time after Compression ms
1
2
10 0
2000
Natural Gas (13A)
8 n-Butane
Methane
1500 Propane
CO2 %
6 Ethane
4 1000
2
500
0 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Crank Angle deg
In-Cylinder Maximum Gas Temperature K Figure 16 Profiles of in-cylinder gas pressure, in-cylinder gas
Figure 15 Relationship between in-cylinder maximum gas temperature and rate of heat release of natural gas 13A,
temperatures and CO, THC and CO2 emissions, combustion methane, ethane, propane and n-butane air mixtures
efficiencies for various equivalence ratio, intake temperature,
intake pressure, external EGR rate and engine speed. more than 1200K, the CO emission is reduced. The CO2
emission becomes higher with increasing maximum gas
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAXIMUM GAS temperature. When the in-cylinder maximum gas
TEMPERATURE AND COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY, temperature is over 1600K, the emission of CO is
CO, THC, CO2 EMISSIONS – Figure 13 and 14 show reduced to about 0.1%, and the combustion efficiency is
the P-T diagram for various equivalence ratios and over 90%. To achieve high combustion efficiency and
intake temperatures. The in-cylinder gas temperature low CO emission in an HCCI engine, it is necessary to
and in-cylinder gas pressure of natural gas (13A) air prepare operating conditions that the in-cylinder
mixture are increased during the compression stroke. maximum gas temperature is over 1600K while
The autoignition occurs when the temperature arrives at restraining knocking.
1072r22K. The in-cylinder gas temperature and in-
cylinder gas pressure are rapidly increased by the heat INFLUENCE OF ETHANE, PROPANE, N-BUTANE
release of air/fuel mixture. After the combustion begins, MOLE FRACTIONS – The composition of natural gas
the bulk-gas quenching occurs unless it is enough varies geographically. In this section, it was investigated
temperature rising to progress the reaction. As the the influences of mole fraction of ethane, propane and n-
equivalence ratio and intake temperature are increased, butane on CO, CO2 emissions and in-cylinder maximum
the in-cylinder maximum gas temperature and in- gas temperature in methane/ethane, methane/propane
cylinder maximum gas pressure become higher. The and methane / n-butane air mixtures. Figure 16 shows
combustion efficiency is sensitive to the in-cylinder the profiles of in-cylinder gas pressure, in-cylinder gas
maximum gas temperature. temperature and rate of heat release of natural gas
(13A), methane, ethane, propane and n-butane air
Figure 15 shows the relationship between in-cylinder mixtures at an equivalence ratio of 0.35. Any
maximum gas temperature and combustion efficiencies, methane/air mixture does not reach the autoignition at
CO, THC, CO2 emissions for various equivalence ratios, this condition. The natural gas, ethane, propane and n-
intake temperatures, intake pressures, external EGR butane ignite when the in-cylinder gas temperature
rates and engine speeds. The CO emission is increased reaches about 1090K, 1050K, 1030K and 1010K. Figure
below an in-cylinder maximum gas temperature of 17 shows the relationship between in-cylinder maximum
1200K. At the in-cylinder maximum gas temperature gas temperature and CO, CO2 emissions. The CO
Downloaded from SAE International by Brought to you by the University of Kansas (Technical reports: 1998 to Present), Saturday, August 25, 2018
CO %
n-Butane Propane 100 mol%
0.4 8 63
40
25 6.3
6 16 4
0.2 10 2
4 0
5 0
2
1000 4
emission is sensitive to the in-cylinder maximum gas 2
0
temperature regardless of fuel structures in this
experiment. The CO emission is reduced to 0.1% when 500
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40
the in-cylinder maximum gas temperature is over 1600K.
Crank Angle deg
Figure 18 Profiles of in-cylinder gas pressure, in-cylinder gas
Figure 18 shows the profiles of in-cylinder gas pressure, temperature and rate of heat release for various ethane mole
fractions in methane / propane / air mixtures
rate of heat release and in-cylinder gas temperature of
methane/propane air mixture at a constant of low
heating value of 875r10J and equivalence ratio of
0.38r0.02. The autoignition occurs at the propane mole Qin=875 10J I=0.38 0.02
fraction of 3.2%. As the mole fraction of propane is Tin=430K Pin=0.1MPa
increased, the autoignition temperature is reduced from Ne=800rpm H=18.8
1102K to 1050K and the auitoignition timing is advanced Jexegr =0% Experiment
1
form BTDC 1q to BTDC 10q. Figure 19 shows the Methane+Ethane
relationship between in-cylinder maximum gas Methane+Propane 0.8
temperature and CO, CO2 emissions for various mole
Methane+n-Butane
0.6
CO %
fraction of ethane, propane, n-butane in methane/ethane,
methane/propane and methane/n-butane air mixtures.
0.4
The CO emission is strongly dependent on in-cylinder
maximum gas temperature regardless of the fuel 0.2
composition.
5 0
CHEMICALSPECIES PROFILES – Figure 20 shows the
4
profiles of in-cylinder gas pressure for various
CO2 %
In-Cylinder Maximum
Jexegr =0%
Gas Temperature K
Calculation
Time after Compression ms 2000
In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
12 1500
Combustion Efficiency %
10 1000
8 I=0.55 0.30
0.50 0.20 500
0.45 0.00
100
6 0.40 80
4 60
40
2
20
THC %
0.50 0.6
0.45 150
0.40 0.30 0.4
0.20 100 0.2
0.00
50 0 1
0.8
CO %
0 0.6
-50 0.4
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 0.2
Crank Angle deg
3 0
(a) Experiment
CO2 %
2
Time after Compression ms
1
In-Cylinder Gas Pressure MPa
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
12 0.30 0
10 I=1.00 0.20 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
0.80 0.10
0.60 0.00 Equivalence Ratio
8 0.50 Figure 21 Emissions of THC, CO, CO2, combustion efficiencies
6 0.40
and in-cylinder gas temperature for various
4 equivalence ratios in calculation
100
O2
10-4 CH4
Mole Fraction
H 2O 100
CO2 10-6
10-5
100 HCHO
OH
10-6
10-5 H 2O 2
Mole Fraction of OH
10-10 10-2
Mole Fraction
10-10 100
OH
In-Cylinder Gas Temperature K
10-6
CH3 O
Mole Fraction of CO
H
10-12
10-10 100
CO
2000 5000
4000 10-6
1500 3000
the combustion efficiency becomes100% and the Charge Compression Ignition Engine”, SAE Paper
CO emission can be reduced to 0%. 2000-01-1833, 2001
5. When the in-cylinder gas temperature reaches about 10. John E. Dec, “A Computational Study of the Effects
1500K, OH radical is generated actively with the of Low Fuel Loading and EGR on Heat Release
HCHO and H2O2 decomposition and CO oxidizes to Rates and Combustion Limits in HCCI Engines”,
CO2 completely. SAE paper 2002-01-1309, 2002
11. Robert. J. Kee, Fran M. Rupley, and Ellen Meeks
REFERENCES and James A. Miller, “A Fortran Chemical Kinetics
Package for The Analysis of Gasphase Chemical
1. Najt. P.M. and Foster, D.E., “Compression-Ignited and Plasma Kinetics”, Sandia National Laboratories,
Homogeneous Charge Combustion” SAE paper 1996
830264, 1983 12. Andrew E. Luz, Robert J. Kee, James A. Miller,
2. Norimasa Iida, “A Study of Autoignition and “SENKIN: A FORTRAN Program for Predicting
Combustion in Two Stroke ATAC Engine – Homogeneous Gas Phase Chemical Kinetics With
Compression Ignition Characteristics of Low Carbon Sensitivity Analysis”, Sandia National Laboratories
Alternative Fuels”, SAE paper 2000-01-1832, 1999- Report, SAND87-8248, 1988
01-3274, 1999 13. Scott B. Fiveland and Dennis N. Assanis,
3. Magnus Christensen and Bengt Johansson, “Development of a Two-Zone HCCI Combustion
“Supercharged Homogeneous Charge Compression Model Accounting for Boundary Layer Effects”, SAE
Ignition(HCCI) with Exhaust Gas Recirculation and paper 2001-01-1028, 2001
Pilot Fuel”, SAE Paper 2000-01-1035, 2000 14. Aceves, S. M., Flowers, D. L., Westbrook, C. K.,
4. T. Igarashi, N. Iida, “Auto Ignition and Combustion of Smith, J. R., Pitz, W. J., Dibble, R., Christensen, M.,
DME and n-Butane / Air Mixtures in Homogeneous and Johansson, B., “A Multi-Zone Model for
Charge Compression Ignition Engine”, SAE paper Prediction of HCCI Combustion and Emissions”,
2000-01-1832, 2000 SAE paper 2000-01-0327, 2000
5. S. Morimoto, Y. Kawabata, T. Sakurai and T. Amano, 15. Aceves, S. M., Smith, J. R., Westbrook, C. K., and
“Operating Characteristics of a Natural Gas-Fired Pitz, W., “Compression Ratio Effect on Methane
Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition HCCI Combustion”, ASME Journal of Engineering
Engine(Performance Improvement Using EGR)”, for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 121, pp. 569-574,
SAE paper 2000-01-1034, 2001 1999
6. Scott B. Fiveland, Rey Agama, Magnus Christensen, 16. S. Kojima “Detailed Modeling of n-Butane
Bengt Johansson, Joel Hiltner, Fabian Mauss and Autoignition Chemistry” COMBUSTION AND
Dennis A. Assanis, “Experimental and Simulated FLAME, 99, 87-136, 1994
Results Detailing the Sensitivity of Natural Gas 17. J. B. Heywood, “Internal Combustion Engine
HCCI Engines to Fuel Composition” SAE paper Fundamentals”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989
2001-01-3609, 2001
7. Joel Hiltner, Scott B. Fiveland, Rey Agma and Martin CONTACT
Willi, “System Efficiency Issues for Natural Gas
Fueled HCCI Engines in Heavy-Duty Stationary Daesu Jun*1 and Norimasa Iida*2
Applications”, SAE paper 2002-01-0417, 2002
8. Magnus. Christensen, Bengt Johansson and Anders Department of System Design Engineering
Hultqvist, “The Effect of Piston Topland Geometry Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama
on Emissions of Unburned Hydrocarbons from a 223-8522 JAPAN
Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition”, SAE
Paper 2001-01-1893, 2001 E-mail*1:[email protected]
9. Anders Hultqvist, Magnus Christensen and Bengt
Johansson, “The Application of Ceramic and E-mail*2:[email protected]
Catalytic Coatings to Reduce the Unburned
Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Homogeneous HP:http://www.iida.sd.keio.ac.jp/index2.html