Scribd
Upload
15 views

Progress Assessment

The document outlines the assessment criteria and procedures for evaluating student progress throughout a course. It describes different assessment methods like presentations, mini-tests, essays, and reflective reports that evaluate students' understanding, application of knowledge, and progress. It provides assessment criteria for each method and details how assessments will be conducted, scheduled, and evaluated.

Uploaded by

Comaythang5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
15 views

Progress Assessment

The document outlines the assessment criteria and procedures for evaluating student progress throughout a course. It describes different assessment methods like presentations, mini-tests, essays, and reflective reports that evaluate students' understanding, application of knowledge, and progress. It provides assessment criteria for each method and details how assessments will be conducted, scheduled, and evaluated.

Uploaded by

Comaythang5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

I.

Progress Assessment

The objective of progress assessment is to evaluate students' understanding, application of


knowledge, and their progress throughout the course, providing opportunities for feedback and
improvement. The assessment can be in one or some forms as presentations, mini tests, essays,
and reflective reports.

Assessment Criteria

Presentations

a. Content: Relevance, depth, and accuracy of the information presented.


b. Organization: Clarity of structure, logical flow, and coherence of the presentation.
c. Delivery: Effective verbal and non-verbal communication, engaging the audience, and
addressing questions or feedback.
d. Visual Aids: Appropriateness, clarity, and effectiveness of supporting visual materials.
e. Time Management: Ability to stay within the allotted time frame.

Mini-Tests:

a. Knowledge: Demonstrated understanding of the concepts, theories, and principles covered.


b. Application: Ability to apply learned knowledge to problem-solving or real-world scenarios.
c. Analysis: Capacity to critically analyze and evaluate information.
d. Accuracy: Correctness and precision of answers.

Essays:

a. Content: Relevance, depth, and accuracy of the analysis and arguments presented.
b. Structure: Clear organization, logical flow, and coherence of the essay.
c. Critical Thinking: Demonstrated ability to critically analyze information, evaluate evidence,
and present well-supported arguments.
d. Writing Style: Clarity, coherence, and effectiveness of written expression, including
grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary.
e. Referencing: Proper use of citations and references, adhering to the required referencing
style.

Reflective Reports:
a. Reflection: Depth and criticality of self-reflection, connecting experiences with relevant
theories and concepts.
b. Analysis: Analytical insights, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
c. Application: Ability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations and reflect upon
their significance.
d. Writing Style: Clarity, coherence, and effectiveness of written expression, including
grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary.

Weightage: 30% or 40% of the assessment pack.

Assessment Methods

The progress assessment will be conducted in-class or through virtual platforms.


Assessment Procedures

a. Presentations: Students are provided with clear guidelines and instructions regarding the
presentation requirements, duration, and expectations. The course lecturer or designated assessor
will evaluate the presentations using the defined assessment criteria.

b. Mini-Tests: The lecturer schedules and administers the mini-tests according to the course plan.
The tests will be marked and graded following predetermined guidelines.

a. Essays: The lecturer evaluates the essays based on the defined assessment criteria. Assessments
may include both formative feedback for improvement and summative evaluation for grading
purposes.

b. Reflective Reports: The lecturer or designated assessor evaluates reflective reports based on the
defined assessment criteria, providing feedback on students' critical reflection and growth
throughout the course unit.

You might also like