AE Harish NarayanK Compositions of Tyagaraja in Desadi and Madhyadi Talas 0767
AE Harish NarayanK Compositions of Tyagaraja in Desadi and Madhyadi Talas 0767
Tyāgarāja, one among the Musical Trinity of Karṇāṭak music was the pioneer in popularizing the
trend of composing compositions set to Dēśādi and Madhyādi tāḷa-s. His style of composing Kīrtana-s
in these tāḷa-s has inspired many of his disciples and other composers who belong to his lineage. The
structure of compositions in this tāḷa-s is a signature bāṇi of Tyāgarāja Śiṣya parampara. Dēśādi and
Madhyādi are names of 'two' tāla-s in which some kīrtana-s of Tyāgarāja, Jāvaḷi-s and Tillānā were set.
However in the 20th century these songs have been generally sung adapted to Ādi tāḷa. This paper
questions whether Dēśādi and Madhyādi are really two tāla-s or one tāla with differences in point of
commencement, the point of melodic accent and in the number of sāhitya syllables accommodated in
a time unit. The paper also examines the manner in which the songs set in these tāla-s have been
adapted to Ādi.
For instance, the song, 'nannu brōva' in the rāga Ābhōgi and in Dēśādi tāla has been notated by
Cinnasvāmi Mudaliyār (106) thus.
Madhyādi -
. . vi du . . la ku . | mrō . . . . ke dā . ||
. . vi du . . la ku .
.. ka li . na ru . | la . ku . . ma hi . |
. . ma lu . de li . | pē . .. .. mi . ||
.. en . . na ḍu . | jū . . . . tu nō . |
.. i na . ku la . | ti . la . ka . . . ||
In the notation of the pallavi of these three songs in Madhyādi given above, the placement of two
vertical lines also is confusing. One would expect them to mark the end of the āvarta. But Mudaliyar
and even Subbarāma Dīkṣitar place them to mark the end of the Pāda ending or the sāhitya division
within a Pallavi, Anupallavi and Caraṇa and not necessarily āvarta.
For instance, if we take the single vertical line, normally denoting the end of an aṅga, then the
commencement point of the syllables, 'vidu', 'kali' and 'en' would be after ¼ mātrā and not ½ mātrā. So
the actual proper organisation of the song should be as follows.
Madhyādi -
V | T | T | T || V | T | T | T ||
. . - vi du | . la ku . | mrō . . . | . ke da . || . . - vidu | . la ku . | mrō . . . | . ke da . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
. . - ka li | . na ru | la . ku . | . ma hi . || . .- malu | . de li . | pē . . . | . . mi . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
. . - en . | . na ḍu . | jū . . . | . tu nō . || . . - i na | . ku la . | ti . la . | ka . . . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
3
In short both Dēśādi and Madhyādi based kīrtana structures suggest a single tāla with four kriyā-s,
one of which must obviously be a niḥśabda-kriyā. If all the four kriyā-s were to be one kind of saśabda
kriyā, namely, a ghātam, then it would be difficult to make out the structure of the tāla.
The Āditāla to which T V Subba Rao (1962:97-99), in his article 'Deśādi and Madhyādi Tālas', traces
the two tāla-s is not very clear. "Ādi tāla is the oldest of tālas. It is for that reason called ādi or the first
tāla. It consists of eight units." Again as pointed out above, the ancient Ādi had one mātra, or say, four
units and not eight.
But Subba Rao later makes a very important statement, "Thus the practice of rendering the ādi tāla
in madhyamakāla by a beat, a wave and two beats became somewhat popular towards the middle of
eighteenth century. As this mode of rendering in the continued sequence resembled the trital of North
Indian music which consists of three beats and a wave, it came to be known as deśya ādi or deśādi
tāla." However he tries to equate this four beat tāla to the modern ādi when he continues, "To describe
the deśādi tāla as consisting of only four units for the simple reason that the eye sees only four
movements of the hand, would be incorrect."
Notwithstanding Subba Rao's attempts to relate the four kriyā Dēśadi to the eight kriyā-s of Ādi,
what is of importance is the connection he makes between Dēśādi and the Tritāla or Tīnatāla of
Hinudstāni Music, both being manifested by four kriyā-s. The Tritāla in Hindustāni,as the name signifies,
has three <tri, tīna) Tāli kriyā-s (saśabda - taṭtu / ghātam-s) and the fourth being a Khāli (niḥśabda -
vīccu / visarjitam). Reṅganāthayyar (1922:6) in his Saṅgītarājaraṅgam, refers to this format of tāla as
Hindustani Ādi-tāla, with the kriyā sequence being taṭtu-viccu-taṭtu-taṭṭu.
However in Hindustāni Tritāla the sequence of kriyā-s is two taṭtu-s, one vīccu and one taṭṭu, as
shown below.
It is perhaps with a view to keep away the confusion of 4 unit ādi and 8 unit ādi associated with
Dēśādi, that Subbarāma Dīkṣitar assigns the name 'Caturaśra-ēka' in Saṅgīta-sampradāya-pradarśini
and simply 'Ēka' while notating kīrtana-s set in Dēśadi. For instance, in Prathamābhyāsa-pustakamu
the kīrtana, 'nannubrōva' (Āhōgi) is notated in the manner shown below.
. . . r | g gr r r | s , , ḍ | s r g mg ||
na | nnu brō . va | nī . . kin | ta tā . ma ||
gr r , | | | ||
sa mā . | | | ||
4
The trouble with such a representation is that the tāla would have one taṭṭu and three vīccu-s as
against the three taṭṭu and one vīccu structure and also the commencement of the song would be on
the fourth quarter of the taṭṭu.
Sāmbamurti (1964:105-106) is quite categorical when he states "The Desādi and Madhyādi tālas
consist of 4 counts each, for an āvarta and are reckoned with a visarjita (wave of the hand) and three
beats.
Thus it is clear that the two names 'Dēśādi' and 'Madhyādi' denote the differing formats of
composition set-up in the same tāla structure. We have two contrasting instances relating to the tāla
Miśra-cāpu.
a) If we take the example of Miśra-cāpu we find that it has sections with 3+4 or 3+2+2 as the normal
proportional time durations. Citing the example kīrtana-s of Śyāma Śāstri,Sāmbamūrti (1964:104)
refers to a version Miśra-cāpu with the sequence 4+3 as 'Vilōma-Cāpu'. However we do not seem
to come across any old books using this tāla name.
b) Another instance is that, in Miśra-cāpu we find kīrtana-s 'mari vēre gati' (Ānandabhairavi, Śyāma
Śāstri) having a sama-graha and kīrtana-s like 'pakkala nilabaḍi' (Kharaharapriya) and ''manasu
svādhīna' (Śaṅkarābharaṇa) having a recurring anāgata-graha of 2/7, yet the tāla carries only one
name and not two.
However if would be appropriate if the miśra-cāpu versions in the two cases could have some
distinguishing prefixes. In the case of Dēśādi and Madhyādi too, better distinguishing nomenclature
could have been conceived.
Subba Rao (1962:99) also takes Dēśādi to be the name of the tāla and Madhyādi name denoting
only a variation in the song-setting format when he says, "The reason for giving the separate name of
madhyādi to a tāla of the same kriyā s as deśādi is to indicate the difference of the unusual eḍuppuof
the anupallavi and the charaṇa." (The latter point will be discussed below.)
Now we shall take up the organisation of songs in the two formats, Dēśādi and Madhyādi.
In the above examples we also observe that there is a three-quarter rest at the commencement of
the third kriyā too.
The structure of the popular Masītakhāni Gata of Hindustani Instrumental Music, mainly Sitāra, set
to Tri-tāla or Tīna-tāla1. The Gata is also said to commence on the 12th mātrā.
X | X | O | X ||
sk | sk | nk | sk ||
di ra | dā di ra dā rā ||
dā dā rā - di ra | dā di ra dā rā | dā dā rā - | ||
We observe two identical halves of 8 mātrā-s in the gata, the first half commencing on the 12th
mātrā and the second one on the 4th. This is the format that is visible in the kīrtana-s set to Dēśādi-
format as mentioned above.
Some of the Khyāla compositions set in Tritāla, in medium tempo, too seem to be set in the above
format, as seen in the example in rāga Kāmōda, (OmkarnāthThākur 1958:56).
X | X | O | X ||
sk | sk | nk | sk ||
jā | nē na dūṅ . ||
gī . .- rī | mā . yī . | mā . yī - | ||
b) Regarding the compositions set in Dēśādi tāla Mudaliyār adds one more point."Another peculiarity
in the rhythm of this measure is that the first and fourth notes in each bar are short and the central one
generally long."The following examples bear this out. But we also see that, the first and fourth syllables
being short and the second one being long pertains, more to the second and fourth bārs or mātrā-s and
not to all.
| I S I | | I S I ||
na | nnu brō . va | nī . . kin | ta tā . ma ||
sa mā . | | | ||
| | | ||
. . . en | ta vē . ḍu | kon . du | . rā . gha ||
1
http://www.nadsadhna.com/pages/indianmusic/IndianInstruments.asp?About=Sarod
6
vā . . | | | ||
| | | ||
ra | ghu nā . ya | ka . . nī | . pā . da ||
yu ga . | | | ||
Ritha Rajan (1999:57-59) has discussed this greater detail and also pointed out cases where the
feature is not incorporated.
The metre or the chandam of the sāhitya syllables also suggests that instead of viewing it as 'ta-
dīm-ta' (I-S-I) within a bar or mātrā, it should be seen as recurring metre of 'ta-ta-dīm' (I-I-S) from the
point of commencement of music with the accent of the music and the accent of the tāla not coinciding
as illustrated belo.
I I S - I I S - I I S - I
ta | ta dīm . ta | ta dīm . ta | ta dīm . ta ||
I S - | | | ||
ta dīm . | | | ||
The metre or the chandam of the sāhitya syllables also suggests that instead of viewing it as 'ta-
dīm-ta' (I-S-I) within a bar or mātrā, it should be seen as recurring metre of 'ta-ta-dīm' (I-I-S) from the
point of commencement of music with the accent of the music and the accent of the tāla not coinciding
as illustrated belo.
__ __ __
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
tām | ta dīm . ta | tām . . tām | ta dīm . ta ||
I I I | | | ||
tām . . | | | ||
__ __
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
tā | . dīm . ta | tām . . tā | . dīm . ta ||
I I I | | | ||
tām . . | | | ||
__ __
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
ta ta | ta dīm . ta | tām . . ta ta | ta dīm . ta ||
I I I | | | ||
tām . . | | | ||
Regarding musical setting in Madhyādi, Chinnasvami Mudaliyār says, ". . . the musical phrase
generally terminates with the first half of the ĀVARTA, a fresh phrase or a variation of the first one being
taken up at the second half of it."
The modified notation of the pallavi-s of the three kīrtana-s can be seen below.
Madhyādi -
V | T | T | T || V | T | T | T ||
. . - vi du | . la ku . | mrō . . . | . kke da . || . . - vidu | . la ku . | mrō . . . | . ke da . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
. . - ka li | . na ru . | la . ku . | . ma hi . || . .- malu | . de li . | pē . . . | . . mi . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
. . - en . | . na ḍu . | jū . . . | . tu nō . || . . - i na . ku la . ti . la . ka . . . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
In the above notation we do not see the musical phrase terminating in the first half of the tāla āvarta
but at the end of it. It is only when one attempts placing the structure in the normal Ādi-tāla format that
the musical phrase is seen to terminate in the first half of the āvarta as shown below.
Ādi -
|4 | O |O ||
T 1 2 3 | T V |T V ||
. . - vi du . la ku . mrō . . . . kke da . | . . - vidu . la ku . | mrō . . . . ke da . ||
..- | | ||
. . - ka li . na ru . la . ku . . ma hi . | . .- malu . de li . | pē . . . . . mi . ||
..- | | ||
. . - en . . na ḍu . jū . . . . tu nō . | . . - i na . ku la . | ti . la . ka . . . ||
..- | | ||
It is in the above case of the kīrtana-s being notated in a normal Ādi-tāla time span, that "a fresh
phrase or a variation of the first one being taken up at the second half of it", as mentioned by Mudaliyār
is seen to materialise.
V | T | T | T ||
8
. . . en | ta vē . ḍu | kon . du | . rā . gha ||
vā . .- pan | ta mē . la | rā . . ō | . rā . gha ||
vā . . | | | ||
ra | ghu nā . ya | ka . . nī | . pā . da ||
yu ga . rā | . jī . va | mula nē . vi | ḍa jā . la ||
śrī . . | | | ||
Since Sāmbamūrti describes the Dēśādi as manifested by a "Visarjita (wave of the hand) and three
beats", we gather that the Padagarbham was on the the second saśabda kriyā or the second Taṭṭu. In
the above examples, if we take the pallavi-s commencing ¾-mātrā after the execution of the Vīccu, then
we observe the padagarabham or the musical accent on second Taṭṭu. However we also observe a
padagarbham on the Vīccu relating to the next āvarta. e.g., on 'nī', 'sa', 'mē' and 'mā' in the pallavi of
the kīrtana 'nannu brōva' and on 'kon', vā', 'rā' and 'vā' in 'enta vēḍukondu'. Thus the padagarbham
seems to be inseparably connected with the ¾ mātrā rest or elongation that is seen on the second Taṭtu
and then on the first Vīccu of the next āvarta.
This feature of accent or padagarbham also seems to draw from the musical organisation in the
Masītakhāni-gata compositions of Sitāra, set to Tritāla in Hindustāni music.
Ritha Rajan (1999:63) mentions a few Jāvalī-s set in Dēśādi format, namely, 'muṭṭavaddurā'
(Sāvēri), which also display the feature of padagarbham (BrindaT 1981:82).
Madhyādi -
V | T | T | T || V | T | T | T ||
. . - vi du | . la ku . | mrō . . . | . kkeda . || . . - vidu | . la ku . | mrō . . . | . ke da . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
. . - ka li | . na ru | la . ku . | . ma hi . || . .- malu | . de li . | pē . . . | . . mi . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
. . - en . | . na ḍu . | jū . . . | . tu nō . || . . - i na . ku la . ti . la . ka . . . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
In the above pallavi-s of the three kīrtana-s, the padagarbham is felt on the third kriyā or the second
Taṭṭu, for instance, on the sāhitya syllables, mrō, la, pē, jū and ti, shown as bold. The sense of
9
padagarbham is strong because, as we observe, it is only in the second Taṭṭu that a sāhitya syllable
coincides with a tāla kiryā. In all other bars /aṅga-s the commencing syllable is ½ or ¼ mātrā moved
away from the kriyā.
In the case of Jāvaḷi, however, the padagarbham is generally seen to be on the fourth kriyā or the
third Taṭṭu as seen in the example from 'apadūru' (Kamāsa rāga) given below (BrindaT 1981:1-3).
Madhyādi -
V | T | T | T || V |T |T |T ||
. . – a pa | dū. ru ku | lō . nai ti | nē . . . || . . – ca pa | la ci . tta | mu cē . da | nē . . . ||
. .- na pa | | | || | | | ||
The Tillānā composition in Jinjhōṭi rāga composed by Maisuru Vīṇā Śēṣaṇṇa appears to be set in the
Madhyādi format and displays a padagarbham similar to that seen in the above Jāvaḷi.
Madhyādi -
V | T | T | T || V |T |T |T ||
. .–dhi ra | nā . . ta | na dīm.ta | dhira na. || . .–dhi ra | nā . . ta | na dīm.ta | dhira na. ||
. .–dhi ra | | | || | | | ||
The reason why Sāmbamūrti felt there was no padagarbham in the Madhyādi format might have
been because, in the Ādi tāla setting, the accent would come on the second finger count. Now, normally
the padagarbham or arudi is associated with a Taṭṭu or the Taṭṭu of the Druta. And in the case of the
Ādi-tāla format as shown below, there is no sāhitya syllable coinciding with the Taṭtu kriyā of the first
Druta. But as pointed earlier, since Madhyādi format is also set in 3 Taṭṭu-s and Vīccu, the accent on
second Taṭṭu has to be recognised as a Padagarbham.
Ādi -
|4 O O
T 1 2 3 T V T V
. . - vi du . la ku . mrō . . . . kke da . | . . - vidu . la ku . | mrō . . . . ke da . ||
..- | | ||
. . - ka li . na ru la . ku . . ma hi . | . .- malu . de li . | pē . . . . . mi . ||
..- | | ||
. . - en . . na ḍu . jū . . . . tu nō . | . . - i na . ku la . | ti . la . ka . . . ||
..- | | ||
seems to be that there is average distribution of two hrasva or one dīrgha syllable in a time unit. An
examination of this reveals something slightly different.
6.1 Dēśādi:
Dēśādi -
V | T | T | T ||
na | nnu brō . va | nī . . kin | ta tā . ma ||
sa mā .- nā | pai nē . ra | mē . . mi | . bal . ku ||
mā . . | | | ||
In the Dēśādi format, there seem to be an average of 4 short /hrasva syllables in one bar / aṅga.
But when the kīrtana is set in the Ādi-tāla format then we see 2 hrasva syllables per mātrā or time-unit
that would equate it to Citratama-mārga of Sambamūrti.
|4 | O | O ||
T 1 2 3 | T V | T V ||
. . . na nnu brō . va | nī . . ki | nta tā . ma . ||
sa . . ma . . | | ||
6.2 Madhyādi:
In the Madhyādi format we observe a distribution of two hrasva syllables per time unit, as per the
example below.
Madhyādi -
V | T | T | T || V | T | T | T ||
. . - vi du | . la ku . | mrō . . . | . kke da . || . . - vidu | . la ku . | mrō . . . | . ke da . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
. . - ka li | . na ru | la . ku . | . ma hi . || . .- malu | . de li . | pē . . . | . . mi . ||
..- | | | || | | | ||
And even when set in the Ādi-tāla format the distribution of syllables is retained, since one āvarta
of Ādi accommodates two āvarta-s of the Madhyādi format.
Ādi -
|4 O O
T 1 2 3 T V T V
. . - vi du . la ku . mrō . . . . kke da . | . . - vidu . la ku . | mrō . . . . ke da . ||
..- | | ||
. . - ka li . na ru la . ku . . ma hi . | . .- malu . de li . | pē . . . . . mi . ||
..- | | ||
11
However Jāvali-s set in Madhyādi format have an average of 4 hrasva akṣara-s (4 syllabic units),
per time unit as seen in the earlier example cited again below.
Madhyādi -
V | T | T | T || V |T |T |T ||
. . – a pa | dū. ru ku | lō . nai ti | nē . . . || . . – ca pa | la ci . tta | mu cē. da | nē . . . ||
. .- na pa | | | || | | | ||
sk | nk | sk | sk ||
na | nnu brō . va | nī . . kin | ta tā . ma ||
| | | ||
sa mā . | | | ||
12
And it is the above sequence of kriyā-s, – sk nk sk sk, that we would arrive at for Dēśādi tāla,
namely, T-V-T-T. It is perhaps for this reason that Subba Rao, as quoted above, said, "Thus the practice
of rendering the ādi tāla in madhyamakāla by a beat, a wave and two beats became somewhat popular
twoards the middle of eighteenth century. As this mode of rendering in the continued sequence
resembled the trital of North Indian music which consists of three beats and a wave, it came to be known
as deśya ādi or deśādi tāla."
But we do not appear get any evidence of Ādi-tāla with T-V-T-T sequence of kriyā-s having been in
vogue in the 18th century.
The Khyāla composition set in Tritāla, in medium tempo, too seem to be set in the above format.
X | X | O | X ||
sk | sk | nk | sk ||
jā | nē na dūṅ . ||
gī . .- rī | mā . yī . | mā . yī - | ||
However the Hindustāni Tritāla the sequence of kriyā-s is two taṭtu-s, one vīccu and one taṭṭu, as
shown below.
1a Tri-tāla: Duration - 16 mātrā-s.
Mātrā 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Kriyā X X O X
Bōla dh dhi dhi dh dh dhi dhi dh dh tin tin tā tā dhi dhi dh
ā n n ā ā n n ā ā n n ā
And hence the Masītakhāni and the Khyāla compositions are said to commence on the 12th mātrā.
Since in Dēśādi-tāḷa the compositions are said to commence on the first aṅga after a lapse of ¾-mātrā
in the case of Dēśādi format and ½-mātrā in the case of Madhyādi format, taking Hindustani format as
the model, we can deduce that the first aṅga was manifested by the Vīccu. Consequently the mode of
rendering of Dēśādi tāḷa would be V-T-T-T, similar to what Sāmbamūrti mentioned.
Subba Rao (1962:98-99) writes in detail on the significance of the term 'Madhyādi'. "the
madhyāditāla is identical with deśādi tāla in kriyā and aṅga ;that is it has also take three beats and a
wave. The liberty frequently taken in the case of deśādi tāla of rendering it as plain ādi tāla in
madhyamakāla is seldom exercised in the case of madhyādi tāla. The eḍuppu of the pallavi in madhyādi
tāla is ordinarily anāgata after one unit, midway between the beat and the wave, corresponding to the
tap of the first finger count in the laghu of the plain ādi tāla in madhyamakāla. This eḍuppu though
typical is not invariable. It is not this particular eḍuppu that serves to distinguish it from deśādi ; for in
ādi tāla the anāgata eḍuppu may be anywhere in the laghu but not after it. The point of distinction of
the madhyādi from deśādi lies in the fact that the anupallavi and the charaṇa of a piece in madhyādi
take their start not in the laghu part corresponding to the beat and the wave but on or just before the
second of the three beats corresponding to the second druta of the ādi tāla. This eḍuppu of five-and-a-
half or six units is uncommon in the usual ādi tāla. It must be remembered that this eḍuppu does not
occur in pallavi but only in anupallavi and charaṇa. The reason for giving the separate name of
madhyādi to a tāla of the same kriyā s as deśādi is to indicate the difference of the unusual eḍuppuof
the anupallavi and the charaṇa. The name itself is indicative of the unusual eḍuppu occurring in the
middle beat or madhyama ghata of the saśabda kriyā of three beats. The madhyādi tāla is not employed
in kīrtanas. It is used fairly extensively in jāvalis."
Subba Rao's description of Madhyādi seems to be based on Jāvaḷi compositions as he does not
relate this format to Kīrtana-s. In the example of the composition 'apadūru', discussed earlier, we find
that the anupallavi commences, to use his words, "on or just before the second of the three beats
corresponding to the second druta of the ādi tāla".
Madhyādi -
V |T | T | T || V |T |T |T ||
. . – a pa | dū. ru ku | lō . nai ti | nē . . . || . . – ca pa | la ci . tta | mu cē . da | nē . . . ||
. .- na pa | | | || | | | ||
anu- pallavi | | || | | | ||
| | | ē . pā . || pi . . . | nā pai dū | re nō kā | ēpāpamu ||
lēka–apa | | | || | | | ||
It is strange that Subba Rao does not recognise the mention of Madhyādi based kīrtana-s by
Cinnasvāmi Mudaliyār.
Sāmbamūrti (1964:106), on the other hand, explains, "Madhyādi is actually Madhya (laya) + Adi.
Compared to Madhyadi, Desadi is slower tempo.". His explanation is not very clear. He attributes
medium tempo to kīrtana-s in Madhyādi format whereas the the examples of kīrtana-s he lists in this
format, namely, 'nāmakusumamula' (śrīrāga), 'mēru samāna' (Mālvagauḷa) seem to display a tempo
slower than that of 'enta vēḍukondu' (Sarasvatīmanōhari), 'Raghunāyakā' (Hamsadhvani) listed under
Dēśadi format.
14
On the point of tempo or Kālapramāṇa, when Subba Rao (1962:98) says, "It must be borne in mind,
however, that deśādi tāla always implies ādi tāla in madhyamakāla, the most common eḍuppu being
anāgata after one-and-a-half units from the start.", it is not clear if he is talking about the kālapramāṇa
of the tāla or of the song.
The point to be investigated here is what prompted such a style. It is possible that the Hindustāni
music Gata metre which had two hrasva strokes in the ¼-mātra time influenced this.
10 Conclusion:
In this paper titled ‘Musical Compositions of Tyāgarāja in Dēśādi tāḷā and Madhyādi tāḷa,
and their Adaptation to Ādi tāḷa’ an attempt has been made to analyse the nature of Dēśādi tāḷa and
Madhyādi tāḷa. Further the adaptation of compositions in these tāḷa-s to Ādi tāḷa have also been
discussed. A few observations are:
1 On the mode of reckoning and on the nature of the Dēśādi tāḷa and the Madhyādi tāḷa, we can say
that, Dēśādi and Madhyādi are not two different tāḷa-s, but two compositional formats based on the
same tāḷa structure with different points of eduppu.
2 T V Subba Rao had expressed that the arrival of this Dēśādi tāḷa in Karnataka music could be
traced to the Tritāla of the Hindustāni Music. This paper examined this and has based the analysis
with reference to that theory of T V Subba Rao. While for the Dēśādi format parallels in Hinduāni
music could be easily had, for Madhyādi further study is required.
3 Regarding the Kriyā-s and the sequence of rendering them, a Wave followed by three Beats, has
been found to acceptable.
4 In the Madhyādi format, two āvartā-s of the tāḷa equals to one āvartā of Ādi tāḷa. In the case of
Dēśādi format, one āvarta of this tāḷa equals one āvarta of Ādi tāḷa.
5 The aspect Padagarbham is a prominent feature and in the Kīrtana-s, the musical emphasis is
primarily on the second Beat, in both Dēśādi and the Madhyādi formats. However in the Dēśādi
format, in addition to the first one on the second Beat, as the music proceeds, there is usually
another Padagarbham on the first kriya which is the Wave. In the case of Jāvaḷi and Tillānā
compositions in Madhyādi tāḷa, the padagarbham is found to be on the fourth kriyā or the third Beat.
Bibliography
Brinda T (1981), Jāvaḷis of Paṭṇam Subrahmaṇyayyar and others, The Music Academy, Madras,
1981.
Cinnasvāmi Mudaliyār, A.M. MudaliyarAMC 1893, Oriental Music in European Notation, Author
publisher, Ave Maria Press, Madras, 1893. http://musicresearchlibrary.net/omeka/items/show/507
Harish Narayan K, Graha as an element of Tāḷa, PhD Dissertation submitted to the University of
Madras, Chennai, 2011 http://musicresearchlibrary.net/omeka/items/show/341
Omkarnāth Thākur (1958), Sangitanjali- Pt.-V -Author Publisher, Varanasi, 1958.
Ramanathan N (2014c),
http://www.musicresearch.in/download.php?id=151&artname=article_151.zip
Renganathayyar S (1922), Saṅgīta-rājaraṅgam, Tiruvanantapuram, 1922
http://www.ibiblio.org/guruguha/MusicResearchLibrary/Books-Mal/BkMal-Renganathayyar-
sangIta-rAjarangOm-1928-0010.pdf
Ritha Rajan (1999), Analysis of Desadi and Madhyadi Tala-s, Journal of the Music Academy,
1999, pp.50-66
16
Sāmbamūrti (1964), Sambamurti P, South Indian Music III, The Indian Music Publishing House,
Madras. 1964.
Sāmbamūrti (1964), Sambamurti P, South Indian Music IV, The Indian Music Publishing House,
Madras. 1963.
Śrīnivāsa Ayyaṅgār, K.V, Śrī Tyāgarājasvāmi Kīrtanaikaḷ, M.Adi& Co, Chennai, 19??.
Śrīnivāsa Ayyaṅgār, K.V., Śrī Tyāgarāja Hṛdayamu (Telugu), M.Adi & Com. Chennai-1, vol.1-
1922, vol.2-1922, vol.3-1922.
Śrīnivāsa Ayyaṅgār, K.V., Śrī Tyāgarāja Hṛdayam (Tamil), M.Adi & Com. Chennai-1, vo..1-1924,
vol.23-1924, vol.3-1924.
Subbarāma Dīkṣitar, (SubbaramaD 1904), Saṅgīta Sampradāya Pradarśini Part I and II, Vidyā
Vilāsini Press, Ettayapuram Samasthānam, Eṭṭayapuram. 1904.
Subbarāma Dīkṣitar, SubbaramaD 1905, Prathamābhyāsa pustakamu, Vidya Vilasini Press,
Ettayapuram, 1905. http://www.ibiblio.org/guruguha/MusicResearchLibrary/Books-Tel/BkTe-
SubbaramaDikshitulu-prathamAbhyAsa-pustakamu-0075.pdf
SubbaRaoTV1962, Subba Rao T.V., Studies in Indian Music, Asia Publishing House, Madras,
1962.
Note:
I thank Dr. N Ramanathan for giving me time to discuss the issues relating to the subject of this article and
permitting me to quote certain passages from his article "Perception of Tāla in Karnataka Music", published in
musicresearchlibrary.net, 2018. http://musicresearchlibrary.net/omeka/items/show/2497.