Investigating Transpiration in Plants Using A Potometer
Investigating Transpiration in Plants Using A Potometer
The rate of transpiration in a plant varies depending on a range of conditions, including light intensity, relative
humidity, wind speeds and temperature, as well as between plant species. Various manipulations to the plant can also
affect transpiration rate.
There are two main types of potometer used in schools – the mass potometer, which measures transpiration through
the loss of mass, and the moving-bubble potometer, which measures water uptake by the shoot. (Note that water
uptake in a cut stem is likely to be greater than that in a rooted plant. This is due to the direct access to xylem vessels
in a cut shoot, rather than resistance to this across the apoplast in a rooted plant.)
This design allows for the possibility of combining both measurement techniques, by placing the potometer on a
balance, and recording both the change in mass and the volume of water taken up.
Although many metabolic processes (e.g. respiration and photosynthesis) also change water content and mass of the
plant, their effects are usually ignored when conducting potometer experiments. This is because the volume of water
involved in metabolic processes is insignificant compared to the large volume constantly flowing through the plant in
the transpiration stream.
Safety Notes
We suggest that a technician sets up the potometers in advance. However, students may be able to do some of the
setting up themselves, perhaps from step 8 onwards.
Some plants exude sap which can irritate some people‟s skin (eg Euphorbia spp.). Care should be taken in
the selection of plants, and technicians may prefer to use gloves when assembling the potometer.
Students should be careful when moving the potometer from one situation to another.
Caution should be taken when preparing holes in rubber bungs (stoppers) - guidance on appropriate methods
for cutting holes and inserting tubing can be found on the CLEAPSS website (search for „making a hole
through a stopper‟).
Caution should be taken when pushing the graduated pipette, the cutting and the syringe into the bung. We
advise using plastic graduated pipettes to reduce chances of breakages/cuts (see supplier details).
Apparatus
Small glass jar – glass baby food jars or 60ml specimen jars may be found to be suitable for this. Shorter jars
make it easier to assemble to whole unit under water to eliminate air bubbles.
Rubber bung (to fit jar) with two 4 mm holes and one 2mm hole
3
1 cm plastic graduated pipette
3 3
10 cm or 20 cm plastic syringe
Blunt cork borer / drill
Paper towel
Sink
Woody plant cuttings, at least 15-20cm long with stem diameter of approx. 5mm, e.g. Sycamore
Bucket of water for collection of cuttings
Scissors or secateurs
It is crucial to avoid air bubbles in the assembled potometer. This is the most common reason for potometer
failure.
1. Cut two 4mm holes and one 2mm hole in the bung (see
safety note).
3
2. Take a 1 cm graduated pipette and carefully push it into
one of the larger holes in the bung. (If the hole needs to
be enlarged, temporarily insert a no. 3 cork borer into the
hole until the graduated pipette is fitted.)
3. Insert the syringe nozzle into the small hole of the bung.
5. Take a plant cutting at least 15-20 cm long. Immediately plunge the cut end of the stem in the sink of water
and remove the bottom 2-3 cm of stem with sharp scissors. Cut the stem at an angle to make it easier to push
into the remaining bung. Leave the cutting in the sink. Try to avoid getting the leaves of the shoot wet when
assembling the potometer in the sink, as this significantly slows down subsequent transpiration.
8. Immerse the bung and syringe, and small jar into the
water, making sure both are full of water.
10. Remove the entire apparatus from the sink and remove
surface moisture with a paper towel.
11. Push syringe plunger down until the water level is at zero
in the graduated pipette. The potometer is now ready for
use.
Suitable glass jars (sold either as 60ml powder bottles or 60ml wide necked bottles) are
available from school suppliers for around 70p each. Size 39 rubber stoppers fit this size
jar, e.g: http://www.timstar.co.uk/bo02880-extra-wide-mouth-bottles-clear-glass.html
http://www.timstar.co.uk/st14605-s-rubber-stoppers-solid.html
Alternatively, glass baby food or similar jars are suitable for this purpose. Rubber stoppers
(bungs) are available from standard school suppliers, and are listed according to smallest
diameter (bottom) measurement, costing around £1.50 ea.
1ml plastic graduated pipettes can be purchased from standard school suppliers, but are
available to purchase in small quantities from King Scientific www.kingscientific.co.uk (see
http://www.kingscientific.co.uk/lab-equipment/graduated-pipette-1ml ) where 10 pipettes are
available for ~£3.60 inc. postage. Sold as sterile disposable units these pipettes can be
reused multiple times for this purpose (the cotton wool plug should be removed before use).
Standard 10 or 20ml plastic syringes can be used, also available from King Scientific in small
quantities (10 x 10ml syringes for ~£2).
Teaching Notes
Reading the water level from the appropriate part of the meniscus
Woody species are needed in order to get the stem through the bung and create a good seal.
Rosemary or lavender potted plants from a supermarket or garden centre should provide enough material for
several potometers and may promote discussion of adaptations to reduce water loss and which habitats they
are naturally found in.
As a minimum students should measure the rate of transpiration for their plant specimen in a pre-prepared
potometer. All the students need to do to start the investigation is to use the syringe to return the water level in
the graduated pipette to zero (or just take an initial reading so long as the water level is high enough).
This can probably be done about every 10mins for about 40mins. This gives them a relatively reliable value
for transpiration for their specimen and the class data can be used to provide repeats (from different
specimens of the same species). An easy way to standardise data between repeats would be to report
transpiration rate per leaf (assuming they are all about the same size).
What else could they do:
2 2
o Report transpiration rate per m or per cm (this may be an opportunity to get students using standard
form),
o Use the potometer on a balance and compare measurements by volume to measurements by mass.
3
Assuming 1cm of water has a mass of 1g do these different ways of measuring agree? How do the
percentage errors for each way of measuring compare?
o Students could compare transpiration rates in two or more species (maybe one with some obvious
adaptations to reduce water loss and one that doesn‟t).
o Students could manipulate the plant to investigate where the majority of water is lost from (e.g. use 4
different set ups – petroleum jelly on both upper and lower surfaces, just on the upper surface, just on
the lower surface, no petroleum jelly).
o Students could manipulate an abiotic factor (light intensity – using lamps, wind speed – using a fan,
temperature – using a hair dryer with a hot and cool setting, humidity – by putting the plant in a plastic
bag).
o Students could investigate the proportion of water lost by transpiration and evaporation in a vase of
cut flowers using a balance to measure water loss.
How do you convert readings of where the water level is to volume of water lost in a particular time period?
How do you work out the rate of water loss over a particular time period?
If you plotted time since the start of the experiment on the x-axis and water level of the y-axis what shows you the rate
of water loss? If this was a straight line what would this tell you?
Why might some data points (maybe in different repeats) deviate from the line of best fit?
How would you present data from an experiment that investigated the effect of an abiotic factor?
How would you present data from an experiment that investigated the effect of a manipulation of the plant compared
to a control (or of two or more different species)?
Watering flowers
Assume your plant specimen has the same transpiration rate as a single rose (i.e. stem, leaves and flower, as
part of a bunch of flowers). How much would you have to top up the vase of water by every day if you had a
bunch of 12 red roses to account for the loss due to transpiration?
How else is water lost from this vase of flowers?
Using Fick‟s law justify a design of vase that would minimise water loss in this way.
Design (and conduct if possible) an experiment to estimate the relative importance of water loss by both these
means.
Farming
Using your thoughts for “scaling your data up” and “watering flowers” write a set of bullet points explaining
why transpiration rates and other factors relating to water loss are important for farmers.
Design an investigation for a farmer to understand how water is lost from their field and suggest what they
could then do with this information.
Flood protection
How does the transpiration rate of plants link to flood risk?
Design an investigation into whether replacing a front lawn with gravel will increase flood risk.
Research online (or use data provided by your teacher) to provide an argument, based on data, for the
maintenance (or planting) of woodland as a way of reducing flood risk.
It is important to consider the purpose of practical work in Biology lessons and the following information provides
suggested areas where this practical can be used to help students develop their practical, mathematical and subject-
knowledge-based skills and understanding. The latter part of this section shows how this practical (or an extension of
it) can also be used to meet some of the A-level specification requirements for the Use of apparatus and techniques
as well as the Common practical assessment criteria (CPAC).
Students can use the worksheet provided to produce evidence of their work in this practical that can contribute to their
practical skills accreditation.
The full practical can allow students to meet various components of Appendix 5c of the GCE AS and A level subject
content for biology, chemistry, physics and psychology (DfE, April, 2014) in bold (with clarification where needed):
1. Use appropriate apparatus to record a range of quantitative measurements (to include mass, time,
volume, temperature, length and pH).
2. Use appropriate instrumentation to record quantitative measurements, such as a colorimeter or
potometer.
3. Use laboratory glassware apparatus for a variety of experimental techniques to include serial dilutions.
4. Use of light microscope at high power and low power, including use of a graticule.
5. Produce scientific drawing from observation with annotations.
6. Use qualitative reagents to identify biological molecules.
7. Separate biological compounds using thin layer/paper chromatography or electrophoresis.
8. Safely and ethically use organisms to measure:
a. Plant or animal responses
b. Physiological functions
9. Use microbiological aseptic techniques, including the use of agar plates and broth
10. Safely use instruments for dissection of an animal organ, or plant organ.
11. Use sampling techniques in fieldwork.
12. Use ICT such as computer modelling, or data logger to collect data, or use software to process data.
(tabulating results of water loos over time, doing calculations, presenting results graphically, statistical
analysis of results)
The learning outcomes document for this practical summarises the key background information relating to the
transport of water through a plant.
Sample data
The table below shows some data collected on a reasonably cool day, with the potometer (in the photograph above)
under normal classroom lighting condition
3
Time since start of Location of water Water loss / cm Average rate of water
experiment / min surface in graduated loss since start of the
3 3 -1
pipette / cm experiment / cm min
0 0.37 0.00 0.0000
15 0.41 0.04 0.0027
45 0.49 0.12 0.0027
75 0.58 0.21 0.0028
Further Investigations
As mentioned within this document there is scope to develop this practical in three directions:
Exploring the link between different abiotic factors and transpiration rate
Manipulations of plants with comparison to a control
Comparisons between different species of plant
Reference
Burgess J.A. (1983) „An improved potometer‟, School Science Review , 64 (229) 699-701
Acknowledgements
Protocol and support materials re-developed by Dr Chris Graham, Long Road Sixth Form College, Cambridge and
Gail Webdell, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge. Thanks to members of the SAPS Teachers and
Technicians Advisory Group for their input into a revision of the resource, and the science club at Didcot Girls School
for trialling the activity.
Science & Plants for Schools: www.saps.org.uk
Potometer and water transport in plants – Teaching and Technical notes: p. 11