SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries - Database Systems
SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries - Database Systems
Database Systems
In our Part 1 note we only looked into querying from one table. Often, however, the data we
need to answer a question will be stored in multiple tables. To query from two tables and
combine the results we use a join.
Cross Join
The simplest join is called cross join, which is also known as a cross product or a cartesian
product. A cross join is the result of combining every row from the left table with every row from
the right table. To do a cross join, simply comma separate the tables you would like to join. Here
is an example:
SELECT *
num name
CS186 DB
CS188 AI
CS189 ML
c_num students
CS186 700
CS188 800
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 1/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
The cartesian product often contains much more information than we are actually interested in.
Let’s say we wanted all of the information about a course (num, name, and num of students
enrolled in it). We cannot just blindly join every row from the left table with every row from the
right table. There are rows that have two different courses in them! To account for this we will
add a join condition in the WHERE clause to ensure that each row is only about one class.
To get the enrollment information for a course properly we want to make sure that num in the
courses table is equal to c_num in the enrollment table because they are the same thing. The
correct query is:
SELECT *
which produces:
Notice that CS189, which was present in the courses table but not in the enrollment table, is not
included. Since it does not appear as a c_num value in enrollment, it cannot fulfill the join
condition num = c_num .
If we really want CS189 to appear anyway, there are ways to do this that we will discuss later.
Inner Join
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 2/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
The cross join works great, but it seems a little sloppy. We are including join logic in the WHERE
clause. It can be difficult to find what the join condition is. In contrast, the inner join allows you
to specify the condition in the ON clause. Here is the syntax:
SELECT column_name(s)
FROM table1
ON table1_column_name = table2_column_name;
The table1_column_name = table2_column_name is the join condition. Let’s write the query that gets us
all of the course information as an inner join:
SELECT *
ON num = c_num ;
This query is logically the exact same query as the query we ran in the previous section. The inner
join is essentially syntatic sugar for a cross join with a join condition in the WHERE clause like we
demonstrated before.
Outer Joins
Now let’s address the problem we encountered before when we left out CS189 because it did not
have any enrollment information. This situation happens frequently. We still want to keep all the
data from a relation even if it does not have a “match” in the table we are joining it with. To fix
this problem we will use a left outer join. The left outer join makes sure that every row from the
left table will appear in the output. If a row does not have any matches with the right table, the
row is still included and the columns from the right table are filled in with NULL . Let’s fix our
query:
SELECT *
ON num = c_num;
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 3/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
Notice that CS189 is now included and the columns that should be from the right table (c_num,
The right outer join is the exact same thing as the left outer join but it keeps all the rows from
the right table instead of the left table. The following query is identical to the query above that
uses the left outer join:
SELECT *
ON num = c_num;
Notice that I flipped the order of the joins and changed LEFT to RIGHT because now courses is on
the right side.
c_num students
CS186 700
CS188 800
CS160 400
But we still want to present all of the information that we have. If we just use a left or a right join
we have to pick between using all of the information in the left table or all of the information in
the right table. With what we know so far, it is impossible for us to include the information that
we have about both CS189 and CS160 because they occur in different tables and do not have
matches in the other table. To fix this we can use the full outer join which guarantees that all
rows from each table will appear in the output. If a row from either table does not have a match
it will still show up in the output and the columns from the other table in the join will be NULL .
SELECT *
ON num = c_num;
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 4/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
Name Conflicts
Up to this point our tables have had columns with different names. But what happens if we
change the enrollment table so that it’s c_num column is now called num ?
num students
CS186 700
CS188 800
CS160 400
Now there is a num column in both tables, so simply using num in your query is ambiguous. We
now have to specify which table’s column we are referring to. To do this, we put the table name
and a period in front of the column name. Here is an example of doing an inner join of the two
tables now:
SELECT *
ON courses.num = enrollment.num
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 5/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
It can be annoying to type out the entire table name each time we refer to it, so instead we can
alias the table name. This allows us to rename the table for the rest of the query as something
else (usually only a few characters). To do this, after listing the table in the FROM we add AS <alias
SELECT *
ON c.num = e.num;
Aliases can also be used in the SELECT clause to rename the column names of the output. If we
execute the following query:
ON c.num = e.num;
Natural Join
Often in relational databases, the columns you want to join on will have the same name. To make
it easier to write queries, SQL has the natural join which automatically does an equijoin (equijoin
= checks if columns are equivalent) on columns with the same name in different tables. The
following query is the same as explicitly doing an inner join on the num columns in each table:
SELECT *
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 6/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
The join condition: courses.num = enrollment.num is implicit. While this is convenient, natural joins
are not often used in practice because they are confusing to read and because adding columns
that are not related to the query can change the output.
Subqueries
Subqueries allow you to write more powerful queries. Let’s look at an example…
Let’s say you want to find the course num of every course that has a higher than average num of
students. You cannot include an aggregation expression (like AVG) in the WHERE clause because
aggregation happens after rows have been filtered. This may seem challenging at first, but sub-
queries make it easy:
SELECT num
FROM enrollment;
SELECT AVG(students)
FROM enrollment;
);
num
CS186
CS188
The inner subquery calculated the average and returned one row. The outer query compared the
students value for each row to what the subquery returned to determine if the row should be
kept. Note that this query would be invalid if the subquery returned more than one row because
>= is meaningless for more than one number. If it returned more than one row we would have to
use a set operator like ALL .
Correlated Subqueries
The subquery can also be correlated with the outer query. Each row essentially gets plugged in to
the subquery and then the subquery uses the values of that row. To illustrate this point, let’s write
a query that returns all of the classes that appear in both tables.
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 7/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
SELECT *
FROM classes
WHERE EXISTS (
SELECT *
FROM enrollment
);
num name
CS186 AI
CS188 DB
Let’s start by examining the subquery. It compares the classes.num (the num of the class from the
current row) to every enrollment.num and returns the row if they match. Therefore, the only rows
that will ever be returned are rows with classes that occur in each table. The EXISTS keyword is a
set operator that returns true if any rows are returned by the subquery and false if otherwise. For
CS186 and CS188 it will return true (because a row is returned by the subquery), but for CS189 it
will return false. There are a lot of other set operators you should know (including ANY , ALL ,
UNION , INTERSECT , DIFFERENCE , IN ) but we will not cover any others in this note (there is plenty of
documentation for these operators online).
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT num
FROM classes
) AS a
Returns:
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 8/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
num
CS186
The subquery returns only the num column of the original table, so only the num column will
appear in the output. One thing to note is that subqueries in the FROM cannot usually be
correlated with other tables listed in the FROM . There is a work around for this, but it is out of
scope for this course. A cleaner way of doing this is using common table expressions (or views if
you want to reuse the temporary table in other queries) but we will not cover this in the note.
Subquery Factoring
Subquery factoring can simplify queries by giving a subquery a name to be used later. To do this,
we use the WITH clause:
WITH courseEnrollment AS (
ON c.num = e.num;
We can then treat courseEnrollment as if it were its own table in a future query:
FROM courseEnrollment
Returns:
CS188 AI 800
The subquery returns only the num column of the original table, so only the num column will
appear in the output. One thing to note is that subqueries in the FROM cannot usually be
correlated with other tables listed in the FROM . There is a work around for this, but it is out of
scope for this course. A cleaner way of doing this is using common table expressions (or views if
you want to reuse the temporary table in other queries) but we will not cover this in the note.
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 9/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
Practice Questions
We will reuse the dogs table from part 1:
dogid integer,
ownerid integer,
name varchar,
breed varchar,
age integer,
);
userid integer,
name varchar,
age integer,
);
The users own dogs. The ownerid column in the dogs table corresponds to the userid column of
the users table ( ownerid is a foreign key that references the users table).
1 Write a query that lists the names of all the dogs that “Josh Hug” owns.
2 Write the query above using a different kind of join (i.e. if you used an INNER JOIN, try using a
cross join with the join condition in the WHERE).
3 Write a query that finds the name of the user and the number of dogs that user owns for the
user that owns the most dogs in the database. Assume that there are no ties (i.e. this query
should only return 1 user). Users may share the same name.
4 Now write the same query again, but you can no longer assume that there are no ties.
Solutions
1
SELECT dogs.name
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 10/11
6/7/24, 9:27 AM SQL Part 2 - Joins & Subqueries | Database Systems
We now need information from both tables (the dog name is only in the dogs table and the
owner name is only in the users table). The join condition is dogs.ownerid=users.userid because
we only want to get rows with the dog and its owner in it. Finally we add the predicate to the
WHERE clause to only get Josh’s dogs.
2
SELECT dogs.name
We first do a cross join and then add our join condition to the WHERE clause.
3
SELECT users.name, COUNT(*)
LIMIT 1;
Similarly to question 2 in the part 1 notes, we can use an ORDER BY combined with a LIMIT to
select the first n most rows (with n being 1 in this case). We GROUP BY the name because we
want our groups to be all about one user. We have to include userid in the GROUP BY,
because users may share the same name.
4
SELECT users.name, COUNT(*)
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM dogs
GROUP BY ownerid
The inner query gets the number of dogs owned by each owner. The owner(s) with the max
number of dogs must have a number of dogs that is >= all these rows in order to be the max.
We put this condition in the HAVING rather than the WHERE clause because it pertains to the
groups not the individual rows.
https://cs186berkeley.net/notes/note2/ 11/11