Scribd
Upload
9 views

PROMETHEE

Uploaded by

LESLY YORLEY FONSECA VALDERRAMA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views

PROMETHEE

Uploaded by

LESLY YORLEY FONSECA VALDERRAMA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

0.

67
Domain Technical domain
Weights 0.0331 0.0991 0.1290477 0.1598 0.094698 0.0918

Available Managed Communication Device


Attribute/Criteria Regions Integration Protocols Security Management Display
Type C Q C Q Q Q
Alternatives

AWS 22 4 3 5 3 4
Azure 55 5 4 4 4 5
GCP 21 3 3 3 3 5

Max (xij) 55 5 4 5 4 5
Min (xij) 21 3 3 3 3 4
(Step I - Normalized c
Weights

Available Managed Communication Device


Attribute/Criteria Regions Integration Protocols Security Management Display
Type C Q C Q Q Q
Alternatives

P1 -AWS 0.029 0.5 0 1 0 0


P2 - Azure 1 1 1 0.5 1 1
P3 - GCP 0 0 0 0 0 1

(Step II - Calculate Differences


P1-P2 -0.971 -0.5 -1 0.5 -1 -1
P1-P3 0.029 0.5 0 1 0 -1
P2-P1 0.971 0.5 1 -0.5 1 1
P2-P3 1 1 1 0.5 1 0
P3-P1 -0.029 -0.5 0 -1 0 1
P3-P2 -1 -1 -1 -0.5 -1 0

(Step III - Calculate Pref


$S_1 - S_2$ 0 0 0 0.5 0 0
$S_1 - S_3$ 0.0294118 0.5 0 1 0 0
$S_2 - S_1$ 0.9705882 0.5 1 0 1 1
$S_2 - S_3$ 1 1 1 0.5 1 0
$S_3 - S_1$ 0 0 0 0 0 1
$S_3 - S_2$ 0 0 0 0 0 0

(Step IV - Calculate aggre


C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Weights=W 0.0331 0.0991 0.1290477 0.1598 0.094698 0.0918
$S_1 - S_2$ 0 0 0 0.0799087 0 0
$S_1 - S_3$ 0.0009722 0.0495574 0 0.1598175 0 0
$S_2 - S_1$ 0.0320822 0.0495574 0.12904767575 0 0.094698157 0.0918128
$S_2 - S_3$ 0.0330544 0.0991149 0.12904767575 0.0799087 0.094698157 0
$S_3 - S_1$ 0 0 0 0 0 0.0918128
$S_3 - S_2$ 0 0 0 0 0 0

(Step V - Determine the leaving and t

Aggregated Pref Leaving


Function AWS Azure GCP Flow m=
AWS 0.152428 0.55062249041 0.3515253
Azure 0.4493775 0.74043962136 0.5949086
GCP 0.1071324 0 0.0535662
Entering Flow 0.2782549 0.076214 0.64553105589

(Step VI - Calculate net outrankin

Leaving Entering
Flow Flow Net Rank
AWS 0.3515253 0.2782549 0.07327031842 2
Azure 0.5949086 0.076214 0.51869455681 1
GCP 0.0535662 0.6455311 -0.59196487523 3

(Step VII - Rank from hi


Azure is the best option based on the weights and answers by each user.

Step I: Normalize the evaluation matrix

Beeficial Criteria (Maximize) (Also is direct criteria)


𝑅_𝑖𝑗= (𝑥_𝑖𝑗−min⁡(𝑥_𝑖𝑗))/(max⁡(𝑥_𝑖𝑗 )−min⁡〖 (𝑥_𝑖𝑗) 〗 ) (𝑖=1,2,…,𝑚;𝑗=1,2,…,𝑛)

Non Beneficial criteria (Minimize) (also know as indirect criteria)

𝑅_𝑖𝑗= ( max⁡(𝑥_𝑖𝑗 )− 𝑥_𝑖𝑗)/(max⁡(𝑥_𝑖𝑗 )−min⁡〖 (𝑥_𝑖𝑗) 〗 ) (𝑖=1,2,…,𝑚;𝑗=1,2,…,𝑛)


Step 3 Preference function

𝑃_𝑗 (𝑎,𝑏)=0 𝑖𝑓 𝑅_𝑎𝑗≤ 𝑅_𝑏𝑗 Distance Ma-Mb <= 0

𝑃_𝑗 (𝑎,𝑏)=(𝑅_𝑎𝑗−𝑅_𝑏𝑗) 𝑖𝑓 𝑅_𝑎𝑗> 𝑅_𝑏𝑗 Distance Ma-Mb > 0

In PROMETHEE-I it uses sum instead of average


also, PROMETHEE-I creates a partial ranking, therefore, II is complete
0.18 0.14
Economic Social
0.0661 0.0253 0.0829 0.0306 0.042 0.04308 0.0563 0.046
Variety of
Data Longevity Training Community Available
Analytics in Market Cost Free Cost cost Support Resources Training
Q Q C (Min) Q C (Min) Q Q C
5 5 138.82 3 150 4 5 4
5 4 182.53 5 165 5 5 3
4 3 3037.5 4 200 3 3 3

5 5 3037.5 5 200 5 5 4
4 3 138.82 3 150 3 3 3
p I - Normalized criteria matrix)

Variety of
Data Longevity Training Community Available
Analytics in Market Cost Free Cost cost Support Resources Training
Q Q C (Min) Q C (Min) Q Q C
1 1 1 0 1 0.5 1 1
1 0.5 0.985 1 0.7 1 1 0
0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0

ate Differences from normalized matrix)


0 0.5 0.015 -1 0.3 -0.5 0 1
1 1 1 -0.5 1 0.5 1 1
0 -0.5 -0.015 1 -0.3 0.5 0 -1
1 0.5 0.985 0.5 0.7 1 1 0
-1 -1 -1 0.5 -1 -0.5 -1 -1
-1 -0.5 -0.985 -0.5 -0.7 -1 -1 0

I - Calculate Preference function)


0 0.5 0.0150793 0 0.3 0 0 1
1 1 1 0 1 0.5 1 1
0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0
1 0.5 0.9849207 0.5 0.7 1 1 0
0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

- Calculate aggregated preference)


C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14
0.0661 0.0253 0.0829 0.0306 0.042 0.04308 0.0563 0.046 1
0 0.012651 0.0012506 0 0.0126133 0 0 0.0460045 0.152428
0.0661031 0.0253019 0.0829326 0 0.0420442 0.02154009 0.056349 0.0460045 0.5506225
0 0 0 0.0306392 0 0.02154009 0 0 0.4493775
0.0661031 0.012651 0.0816821 0.0153196 0.0294309 0.04308018 0.056349 0 0.7404396
0 0 0 0.0153196 0 0 0 0 0.1071324
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

the leaving and the entering outranking flows)

te net outranking flow for each alternative)

VII - Rank from highest to lowest)


SAATY Scale
This is for Weighting

Qualitative Conversion
Low 1
Below Aver 2
Average 3
Good 4
Excellent 5
P1-P2
P1-P3
P2-P1
P2-P3
P3-P1
P3-P2
0.67
Domain Technical domain
Weights 0.0331 0.0991 0.1290477 0.1598 0.094698 0.0918

Available Managed Communication Device


Attribute/Criteria Regions Integration Protocols Security Management Display
Type C Q C Q Q Q
Alternatives

AWS 22 4 3 5 3 4
Azure 55 5 4 4 4 5
GCP 21 3 3 3 3 5

Max (xij) 55 5 4 5 4 5
Min (xij) 21 3 3 3 3 4
(Step I - Normalized c
Weights

Available Managed Communication Device


Attribute/Criteria Regions Integration Protocols Security Management Display
Type C Q C Q Q Q
Alternatives

P1 -AWS 0.029 0.5 0 1 0 0


P2 - Azure 1 1 1 0.5 1 1
P3 - GCP 0 0 0 0 0 1

(Step II - Calculate Differences


P1-P2 -0.971 -0.5 -1 0.5 -1 -1
P1-P3 0.029 0.5 0 1 0 -1
P2-P1 0.971 0.5 1 -0.5 1 1
P2-P3 1 1 1 0.5 1 0
P3-P1 -0.029 -0.5 0 -1 0 1
P3-P2 -1 -1 -1 -0.5 -1 0

(Step III - Calculate Pref


$S_1 - S_2$ 0 0 0 0.5 0 0
$S_1 - S_3$ 0.0294118 0.5 0 1 0 0
$S_2 - S_1$ 0.9705882 0.5 1 0 1 1
$S_2 - S_3$ 1 1 1 0.5 1 0
$S_3 - S_1$ 0 0 0 0 0 1
$S_3 - S_2$ 0 0 0 0 0 0

(Step IV - Calculate aggre


C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Weights=W 0.0331 0.0991 0.1290477 0.1598 0.094698 0.0918
$S_1 - S_2$ 0 0 0 0.0799087 0 0
$S_1 - S_3$ 0.0009722 0.0495574 0 0.1598175 0 0
$S_2 - S_1$ 0.0320822 0.0495574 0.12904767575 0 0.094698157 0.0918128
$S_2 - S_3$ 0.0330544 0.0991149 0.12904767575 0.0799087 0.094698157 0
$S_3 - S_1$ 0 0 0 0 0 0.0918128
$S_3 - S_2$ 0 0 0 0 0 0

(Step V - Determine the leaving and t

Aggregated Pref Leaving


Function AWS Azure GCP Flow m=
AWS 0.152428 0.55062249041 0.3515253
Azure 0.4493775 0.74043962136 0.5949086
GCP 0.1071324 0 0.0535662
Entering Flow 0.2782549 0.076214 0.64553105589

(Step VI - Calculate net outrankin

Leaving Entering
Flow Flow Net Rank
AWS 0.3515253 0.2782549 0.07327031842 2
Azure 0.5949086 0.076214 0.51869455681 1
GCP 0.0535662 0.6455311 -0.59196487523 3

(Step VII - Rank from hi


Azure is the best option based on the weights and answers by each user.

Step I: Normalize the evaluation matrix

Beeficial Criteria (Maximize) (Also is direct criteria)


𝑅_𝑖𝑗= (𝑥_𝑖𝑗−min⁡(𝑥_𝑖𝑗))/(max⁡(𝑥_𝑖𝑗 )−min⁡〖 (𝑥_𝑖𝑗) 〗 ) (𝑖=1,2,…,𝑚;𝑗=1,2,…,𝑛)

Non Beneficial criteria (Minimize) (also know as indirect criteria)

𝑅_𝑖𝑗= ( max⁡(𝑥_𝑖𝑗 )− 𝑥_𝑖𝑗)/(max⁡(𝑥_𝑖𝑗 )−min⁡〖 (𝑥_𝑖𝑗) 〗 ) (𝑖=1,2,…,𝑚;𝑗=1,2,…,𝑛)


Step 3 Preference function

𝑃_𝑗 (𝑎,𝑏)=0 𝑖𝑓 𝑅_𝑎𝑗≤ 𝑅_𝑏𝑗 Distance Ma-Mb <= 0

𝑃_𝑗 (𝑎,𝑏)=(𝑅_𝑎𝑗−𝑅_𝑏𝑗) 𝑖𝑓 𝑅_𝑎𝑗> 𝑅_𝑏𝑗 Distance Ma-Mb > 0

In PROMETHEE-I it uses sum instead of average


also, PROMETHEE-I creates a partial ranking, therefore, II is complete
0.18 0.14
Economic Social
0.0661 0.0253 0.0829 0.0306 0.042 0.04308 0.0563 0.046
Variety of
Data Longevity Training Community Available
Analytics in Market Cost Free Cost cost Support Resources Training
Q Q C (Min) Q C (Min) Q Q C
5 5 138.82 3 150 4 5 4
5 4 182.53 5 165 5 5 3
4 3 3037.5 4 200 3 3 3

5 5 3037.5 5 200 5 5 4
4 3 138.82 3 150 3 3 3
p I - Normalized criteria matrix)

Variety of
Data Longevity Training Community Available
Analytics in Market Cost Free Cost cost Support Resources Training
Q Q C (Min) Q C (Min) Q Q C
1 1 1 0 1 0.5 1 1
1 0.5 0.985 1 0.7 1 1 0
0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0

ate Differences from normalized matrix)


0 0.5 0.015 -1 0.3 -0.5 0 1
1 1 1 -0.5 1 0.5 1 1
0 -0.5 -0.015 1 -0.3 0.5 0 -1
1 0.5 0.985 0.5 0.7 1 1 0
-1 -1 -1 0.5 -1 -0.5 -1 -1
-1 -0.5 -0.985 -0.5 -0.7 -1 -1 0

I - Calculate Preference function)


0 0.5 0.0150793 0 0.3 0 0 1
1 1 1 0 1 0.5 1 1
0 0 0 1 0 0.5 0 0
1 0.5 0.9849207 0.5 0.7 1 1 0
0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

- Calculate aggregated preference)


C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14
0.0661 0.0253 0.0829 0.0306 0.042 0.04308 0.0563 0.046 1
0 0.012651 0.0012506 0 0.0126133 0 0 0.0460045 0.152428
0.0661031 0.0253019 0.0829326 0 0.0420442 0.02154009 0.056349 0.0460045 0.5506225
0 0 0 0.0306392 0 0.02154009 0 0 0.4493775
0.0661031 0.012651 0.0816821 0.0153196 0.0294309 0.04308018 0.056349 0 0.7404396
0 0 0 0.0153196 0 0 0 0 0.1071324
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

the leaving and the entering outranking flows)

te net outranking flow for each alternative)

VII - Rank from highest to lowest)


SAATY Scale
This is for Weighting

Qualitative Conversion
Low 1
Below Aver 2
Average 3
Good 4
Excellent 5
P1-P2
P1-P3
P2-P1
P2-P3
P3-P1
P3-P2

You might also like