EXPLORING POSITIVE
RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK
Building a Theoretical
and Research Foundation
exploring positive
relationships at work
Building a Theoretical
and Research Foundation
Edited by
Jane E. Dutton
University of Michigan
Belle Rose Ragins
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Copyright © 2007 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form,
by photostat, microform, retrieval system, or any other means, without
the prior written permission of the publisher.
First published 2007 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Publishers
Reprinted 2009 by Psychology Press
27 Church Road, Hove, East Sussex, BN3 2FA
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Psychology Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group,
an informa business
Cover design by Tomai Maridou
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Exploring Positive Relations at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research foundation
ISBN 978-0-8058-5388-9 (hbk)
ISBN 978-0-8058-5389-6 (pbk)
Copyright information for this volume can be obtained by contacting the Library of Congress.
To our partners in life-
Lloyd Sandelands and Erik Thelen
Contents
Series Foreword ix
Acknowledgments xiii
About the Contributors XV
PART I: INTRODUCTION
1 Positive Relationships at Work:
An Introduction and Invitation 3
Belle Rose Ragins and Jane E. Dutton
PART II: POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS:
INDIVIDUALS AND DYADS
2 From Proving to Becoming: How Positive
Relationships Create a Context for Self-Discovery
and Self-Actualization 29
Laura Morgan Roberts
vii
viii CONTENTS
3 Bodily Insights: Three Lenses on Positive
Organizational Relationships 47
Emily D. Heaphy
4 Energizing Others in Work Connections 73
Ryan W Quinn
5 Positive Relationships in Action: Relational Mentoring
and Mentoring Schemas in the Workplace 91
Belle Rose Ragins and Amy Klemm Verbos
6 Rebuilding Trust and Restoring Positive Relationships:
A Commitment-Based View of Trust 117
Michael G. Pratt and Kurt T. Dirks
7 The Engines of Positive Relationships Across Difference:
Conflict and Learning 137
Martin N Davidson and Erika Hayes James
8 Positive Organizational Justice: From Fair to
Fairer-and Beyond 159
Jerald Greenberg
9 Commentary: Finding Connections
at the Individual/Dyadic Level 179
Steve Duck
PART III: POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS:
GROUPS AND COMMUNITIES
10 Meaningful Connections: Positive Relationships
and Attachments at Work 189
William A. Kahn
11 A Contingency Perspective on Developmental Networks' 207
Monica Higgins
12 Structural Balance in Teams 225
Deborah Ancona and William Isaacs
13 Positive Relationships and Cultivating Community 243
Ruth Blatt and Carl T. Camden
CONTENTS ix
14 History, Structure, and Practices: San Pedro
Longshoremen in the Face of Change 265
Kathleen L. McGinn
15 Commentary: Positive Relationships in Groups
and Communities 277
William A. Kahn
PART IV: POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS:
ORGANIZATIONS AND ORGANIZING
16 Creating and Sustaining Positive Organizational
Relationships: A Cultural Perspective 289
Karen Golden-Biddle, Kathy GermAnn, Trish Reay,
and Gladys Procyshen
17 My Family, My Firm: How Familial Relationships
Function as Endogenous Organizational Resources 307
Mary Ann Glynn and Krysia Wrobel
18 Enabling Positive Social Capital in Organizations 325
Wayne Baker and Jane E. Dutton
19 Leadership, Power, and Positive Relationships 347
Joyce K Fletcher
20 Commentary: Following the Resources in Positive
Organizational Relationships 373
Denise M Rousseau and Kimberly Ling
PART V: CONCLUSION
21 Moving Forward: Positive Relationships at Work
as a Research Frontier 387
Jane E. Dutton and Belle Rose Ragins
Author Index 401
Subject Index 415
Series Foreword
Dutton and Ragins's book opens with the following words: "What makes life
worth living? For most people, the answer is relationships: friends, family,
and loved ones. Too often work relationships are not included in this list."
The collection of chapters they put together constitute an "invitation" (to
use their metaphor) to scholars to better understand why work relation-
ships too often are missing from the list and how this state-of-affairs can be
changed. The approaches to positive work relationships offered are broad,
innovative, and provocative. How positive work relationships fuel self-
discovery and self-actualization, how conflict and learning can drive posi-
tive work relationships, and how familial relationships enter into the equa-
tion represent a bit of the enticing territory covered. We are confident Jane
and Belle's invitation will be accepted by many, hopefully leading to
workplaces becoming settings more characterized as protective, comfort-
ing, and stimulating. We are so pleased to be involved in delivering their in-
vitation to you.
-Arthur P. Brief
University of Utah
-James P. Walsh
University of Michigan
xi
Acknowledgments
This book represents the hard work of many individuals. First and fore-
most, we would like to thank Janet Max, the Projects Coordinator at the Uni-
versity of Michigan's Center for Positive Organizational Scholarship. Janet
did a spectacular job designing and executing the book-building conference
that served as a foundation for this volume. We would have been lost with-
out her help coordinating the myriad of details and deadlines surrounding
this book. We would also like to thank doctoral students Brianna Barker
Caza, Marlys Christianson, Jacoba Lilius, and Sandy Lim for their meticu-
lous work documenting the ideas and insights that emerged in our book-
building conference. We extend deep appreciation to Lawrence Erlbaum As-
sociates, Publishers, ICOS at the University of Michigan, The Institute for Di-
versity Education and Leadership (IDEAL) at the University of Wisconsin-
Milwaukee, and the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of
Michigan for their financial support for the book-building conference. Last,
but certainly not least, we would like to thank the contributors to this vol-
ume for bringing their creativity, energy, and wisdom to this project. This
book was a labor of love with many participants, and we are grateful for
their efforts.
xiii
About the Contributors
Deborah Ancona is the Seley Distinguished Professor of Management at
the MIT Sloan School of Management and the faculty director of the MIT
Leadership Center. Her research focuses on distributed leadership, teams,
and timing. She studies how teams manage both their internal and external
dynamics to obtain high performance in a structure called an X-team. She
also examines entrainment, showing how teams respond to multiple pacers
in the environment. This work has been published in Administrative Science
Quarterly, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review,
Organization Science, and Sloan Management Review. She received her BA
and MS in psychology from the University of Pennsylvania and her PhD in
management from Columbia University.
Wayne Baker is professor of management and organizations and director
of the Center for Positive Organizational Scholarship at the Stephen M.
Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan. He is also Professor
of Sociology at the University of Michigan. He earned his PhD in sociology
from Northwestern University. His research foci include energy networks in
organizations; positive social capital and generalized reciprocity; and val-
ues, religion, and spirituality. His latest book, America's Crisis of Values: Re-
ality and Perception, was published by Princeton University Press in 2005.
Ruth Blatt is a PhD candidate in Management and Organizations at the Ross
School of Business at the University of Michigan. She has a BA in psycho!-
XV
xvi ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
ogy from Swarthmore College and an MS in organizational behavior from
Tel Aviv University. Her research examines how individuals proactively cre-
ate conditions for excellence in their work lives through meaning making
and positive relationships, particularly when they work in nonstandard em-
ployment arrangements or in nascent organizations.
Carl T. Camden is President and Chief Executive Officer of Kelly Services,
Inc., a Fortune 500 company. He previously worked for KeyCorp as their se-
nior vice president and director of corporate marketing, served as Co-
president of Wyse Advertising in Cleveland, and was Cofounder of North
Coast Behavioral Research Group. He also served as associate professor at
Cleveland State University and received his doctorate in communications
from Ohio State University.
Martin N. Davidson is associate professor of leadership and organizational
behavior at the Darden Graduate School of Business at the University of Vir-
ginia. His research on the impact of culture and ethnicity on conflict man-
agement and on career development appears in academic and managerial
outlets including Administrative Science Quarterly, Research on Negotiation in
Organizations, Journal of Personality, and Review of Educational Research. His
recent research examines critical competencies for managing effectively
across national boundaries. He is the Chair of the Academy of Manage-
ment's Gender and Diversity in Organizations Division. He received his doc-
torate from Stanford University and his AB from Harvard University.
Kurt T. Dirks received his PhD from the University of Minnesota and is cur-
rently an associate professor of organizational behavior at the Olin School
of Business at Washington University in St. Louis. His research is focused
on trust in the workplace. He also conducts research on feelings of owner-
ship. His research has appeared in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Acad-
emy of Management Review, Organization Science, Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, and the Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Steve Duck is a professor of communication studies and the Daniel and
Amy Starch Research Chair at the University of Iowa. He is the founding edi-
tor of the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships and the editor or au-
thor of 45 books on personal relationships. In addition, he founded the In-
ternational Network on Personal Relationships (now merged into the
International Association for Relationship Research) and two series of inter-
national conferences on relationships.
Jane E. Dutton is the William Russell Kelly Professor of Business Adminis-
tration and professor of psychology at the Stephen M. Ross School of Busi-
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS xvii
ness at the University of Michigan. She received her PhD from Northwest-
ern University. Her research interests include organizational compassion,
high-quality connections, resilience and thriving at work, and positive or-
ganizational scholarship.
Joyce K. Fletcher is professor of management at the Simmons School of
Management in Boston, affiliated faculty at the Simmons Center for Gender
in Organizations, and a Senior Research Scholar at the Jean Baker Miller
Training Institute at Wellesley College. Author of Disappearing Acts: Gender,
Power and Relational Practice at Work (MIT Press), Fletcher is a frequent
speaker at national and international conferences on the topic of women,
power, and leadership.
Kathy GermAnn earned her PhD in organizational analysis from the Uni-
versity of Alberta School of Business. In her research, she seeks to under-
stand the human(e) dimensions of organizing. She is particularly interested
in studying dyadic and collective patterns of relating among organizational
members and how these shape possibilities for people to experience well-
being through working. Prior to her academic career, GermAnn worked ex-
tensively in the Canadian health system.
Mary Ann Glynn earned her PhD from Columbia University and is profes-
sor of organization studies at Boston College. She studies cognitive and cul-
tural processes of meaning making, identity formation, and symbolic man-
agement, as they relate to organizational change and innovation. She has
published in leading management, marketing, psychology, and sociology
journals and served on several editorial boards. Currently, she is an officer
of the Managerial and Organizational Cognition Division of the Academy of
Management.
Karen Golden-Biddle is professor of organizational behavior at Boston Uni-
versity. Her research examines the processes and symbolics of organiza-
tional change, and the sociology of organizational theorizing. She has pub-
lished numerous articles and book chapters, and has coauthored the book,
Composing Qualitative Research (2nd edition, 2006). Golden-Biddle has
served on numerous editorial boards, and was recently elected to the
Board of Governors of the Academy of Management.
Jerald Greenberg received his PhD in industrial/organizational psychology
from Wayne State University in 1975. He currently is Abramowitz Professor
of Business Ethics at the Ohio State University's Fisher College of Business.
Greenberg has authored more than 20 books and 150 chapters and journal
articles, most of which focus on organizational justice. He has received nu-
xviii ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
merous research awards, including the Heneman Award for Career
Achievement from the HR Division of the Academy of Management, and the
Distinguished Research Award from the Society of Industrial-Organizational
Psychology.
Emily Heaphy is a doctoral candidate in management and organizations at
the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan. She
earned her BA at Wellesley College. Her research focuses on how people's
relationships at work, emotions, and bodies affect how they perform their
work roles.
Monica Higgins is an associate professor in Harvard Business School's Or-
ganizational Behavior Unit. She earned her PhD in organizational behavior
and MA in psychology from Harvard University and her MBA from Tuck
Business School at Dartmouth. Her research interests include career and
leader development, mentoring, and strategic human resources manage-
ment. Her book, Career Imprints: Creating Leaders Across an Industry, focuses
on the leadership development of executives in biotechnology. Her work
has also appeared in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Or-
ganization Science, and Strategic Management Journal.
William Isaacs is a senior lecturer at Massachusetts Institute of Technol-
ogy's Sloan School of Management, and founder and president of Dialogos,
a consulting and leadership transformation company based in Cambridge,
MA. His book Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together (Doubleday) was fea-
tured in Fast Company as a guide to "the secret of good informal conversa-
tion." He lectures and consults around the world. He received an AB from
Dartmouth College, an MSc from the London School of Economics, and an
MPhil and DPhil from Oxford University.
Erika Hayes James is an associate professor of leadership and organiza-
tional behavior at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration
at the University of Virginia. She earned her BA in psychology at Pomona
College and her master's and PhD in organizational psychology at the Uni-
versity of Michigan. Her research interests include crisis leadership, change
management, and workplace diversity. She has combined these interests
into a stream of research examining firms' strategic responses to discrimi-
nation lawsuits. In addition, James studies the role of crises in producing or-
ganizational change and innovation. She has published in academic jour-
nals, including Strategic Management Journal, Organization Science, Journal of
Applied Psychology, and Organizational Dynamic, and her work has been fea-
tured in the popular press. She is the editor and a contributing author of
the book An Executive Briefing on Crisis Leadership.
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS xix
William A. Kahn is professor of organizational behavior at Boston Univer-
sity's School of Management. He earned his PhD in psychology from Yale
University. His work focuses on the dynamics of caregiving organizations,
with particular attention to relational dynamics that facilitate or undermine
organizational change and development. Kahn has published articles in a
wide variety of academic journals and recently published a book entitled
Holding Fast: The Struggle to Create Resilient Caregiving Organizations (Brun-
ner-Routledge, 2005).
Kimberly Ung is a doctoral student of organizational behavior and theory
at the Carnegie Mellon University Tepper School of Business. Her research
interests include positive organizational scholarship, the role of emotions
in decision making, and the impact of social support on health and well-
being. She explores these areas using a neuropsychological and physiologi-
cal approach in addition to traditional methods.
Kathleen L. McGinn is the Cahners-Rabb Professor of Business Administra-
tion at Harvard Business School. She focuses her research on interpersonal
relationships and their role in negotiations, conflict, and resource alloca-
tion within and between organizations. Before going to Harvard, McGinn
taught at Cornell University's Johnson Graduate School of Management and
Northwestern University's Kellogg Graduate School of Management.
Michael G. Pratt earned his PhD in organizational psychology from the Uni-
versity of Michigan. He is a James F. Towey Fellow and associate professor
at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. His research centers on is-
sues of identity, meaning, and knowing. He has published in several jour-
nals including the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management
Review, and Administrative Science Quarterly. He recently coedited a book,
Artifacts in Organizations. In addition to his service on editorial boards, he is
an associate editor at the Journal of Management Inquiry, and division chair-
elect for the Managerial and Organizational Cognition Division of the Acad-
emy of Management.
Gladys Procyshen held senior health system leadership positions for 35
years. Of those, 25 years were dedicated to public health, her area of pas-
sion, which notably included 12 years as Chief Executive Officer of the
Wetoka Health Unit in central Alberta, Canada. She continues to voluntarily
mentor others as an extension of her lifetime commitment to developing
and supporting a positive and inclusive corporate culture where respect for
all people, continuous learning, quality improvement, and development of
leaders at all levels are hallmarks.
XX ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
Ryan W. Quinn earned his PhD in organizational behavior and human re-
source management from the University of Michigan Business School in
2003. He served on the faculty at the Olin School of Business at Washington
University in St. Louis, and then at the Darden Graduate School of Business
at the University of Virginia. He studies high-impact conversations-conver-
sations, for example, that coordinate, that energize, that transform, that
create capabilities for courageous action, and conversations that people ex-
perience as high-performing.
Belle Rose Ragins is a professor of management at the University of Wis-
consin-Milwaukee (UWM) and the Research Director of the UWM Institute
for Diversity Education and Leadership (IDEAL). Her research interests fo-
cus on mentoring and diversity in organizations. She has received a num-
ber of national awards for her research, including the Sage Life-Time
Achievement Award for Scholarly Contributions to Management, the Acad-
emy of Management Mentoring Legacy Award, the American Society for
Training and Development Research Award, and the American Psychologi-
cal Association Placek Award. She is a Fellow of the Society for Industrial-
Organizational Psychology, the American Psychological Society, the Society
for the Psychology of Women, and the American Psychological Association.
Trish Reay is an assistant professor at the University of Alberta School of
Business in the Department of Strategic Management and Organization. Her
research interests include organizational change, organizational learning,
and institutionalization of new practices. Currently, she conducts research
in the context of health care and family businesses. Her work has appeared
in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Organization Studies,
and Human Resource Management.
Laura Morgan Roberts is an assistant professor of organizational behavior
at the Harvard Business School. She received her PhD in organizational psy-
chology from the University of Michigan. Roberts examines the pathways
by which individuals become extraordinary within work organizations. Her
research identifies systems and practices that build competence, agency,
and purposeful connection across dimensions of difference. Her work has
been published in the Academy of Management Review, Harvard Business Re-
view, and the Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Denise M. Rousseau received her PhD in industrial/organizational psychol-
ogy from the University of California at Berkeley. Her research focuses on
ways to create effective change and mutuality in the employment relation-
ship. Her 1995 book, Psychological Contracts in Organizations, won the Acad-
emy of Management's Terry Award. Her most recent book, I-Deals: Idiosyn-
cratic Deals Employees Bargain for Themselves, examines the role employees
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS xxi
play in shaping their relations with an employer. She is a fellow in the Soci-
ety for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, the American Psychological
Association, the Academy of Management, and the British Academy of Man-
agement. She is a past president of the Academy of Management and Edi-
tor-in-Chief of the Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Amy Klemm Verbos is a PhD candidate in management at the University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She also holds a JD from the University of Wisconsin
Law School, and an MPA from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Her
research focuses on the psychological processes in mentoring relation-
ships.
Krysia Wrobel is a doctoral student studying social psychology at Emory
University.
PART
I
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER
1
Positive Relationships at Work:
An Introduction and Invitation
Belle Rose Ragins
Jane E. Dutton
What makes life worth living? For most people, the answer is relationships:
friends, family, and loved ones. Too often, work relationships are not in-
cluded in this list. Yet people spend most of their time at work, and work re-
lationships are central not only for how work gets done, but also for the
quality of our lives. Like other relationships, work relationships reflect the
full spectrum of quality. At their best, they can be a generative source of en-
richment, vitality, and learning that helps individuals, groups, and organiza-
tions grow, thrive, and flourish. At their worst, they can be a toxic and cor-
rosive source of pain, depletion, and dysfunction. Despite the criticality of
work relationships for individuals, groups, and organizations, organization-
al scholars have yet to understand the dynamics, mechanisms, and proc-
esses that generate, nourish, and sustain positive relationships at work.
This book is designed to put the field of positive relationships at work on
the research map by crafting a multidisciplinary volume that uncovers the
mechanisms and dynamics of positive work relationships. We envision pos-
itive relationships at work (PRW) as a rich new interdisciplinary domain of
inquiry that focuses on the generative processes, relational mechanisms,
and positive outcomes associated with positive relationships between peo-
ple at work. PRW examines the conditions, processes, and mechanisms in
organizational relationships that increase the capacity for growth, learning,
generativity, and resilience in individuals, groups, and organizations.
This introductory chapter starts by giving the reader a brief overview of
how positive relationships at work relates to the positive scholarship move-
3
4 RAGINS AND DUTTON
ment. We then examine why this book is needed and provide the reader
with the mission, vision, and objectives of the book. Next, we offer a founda-
tion for defining positive relationships at work based on a distillation of the
approaches used by the contributors to this volume. From there, we give
the reader a practical overview of the roadmap of the book. This is followed
by an appreciative summary of the book chapters that invites our readers
to explore this rich new research frontier.
POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK
AND THE POSITIVE SCHOLARSHIP MOVEMENT
As a new area of inquiry, the field of positive relationships at work builds
on the positive psychology (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000; Snyder &
Lopez, 2002), positive organizational (Cameron & Caza, 2004; Cameron,
Dutton, & Quinn, 2003), and positive organizational behavior (Luthans,
2002; Luthans & Youssef, 2004) scholarship movements by shifting the
lens from models that explain deficiencies to models that explain states of
abundance. These positive scholarship movements offer the observation
that by focusing on the problems, pathologies, and limitations associated
with the worst of conditions we fail to capture the processes, states, and
outcomes associated with the best of conditions. In a nutshell, we need to
shift our perspective from the shadow to the light, from "what is wrong"
to "what is right."
The field of positive relationships at work applies this paradigm to work
relationships, and builds on the positive psychology view that relationships
are a central source of life satisfaction, enrichment, development, and per-
sonal growth for individuals ( cf. Berscheid, 1999; Reis & Gable, 2003; Snyder
& Lopez, 2002). It also builds on a positive sociological lens (e.g., Baker,
Cross, & Wooten, 2003) that suggests that certain patterns of relationships
are more generative, enriching, and enhancing than others.
However, we envision PRW as offering organizational scholars more
than just a positive perspective on relationships in organizations. PRW
seeks to explain how relationships affect organizations through multiple
levels and mechanisms and therefore deepens our understanding of the
role of relationships in organizational life. Relationship science scholars ob-
serve that human behaviors do not occur in a vacuum, but take place
within the context of relationships (cf. Berscheid, 1999). PRW embraces
this perspective by viewing relationships as "front and center" in organi-
zational life. Under this view, relationships represent not only the essence
of meaning in people's lives, but they also reside deep in the core of or-
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 5
ganizational life; they are the means by which work is done and meaning
is found in organizations.
WHY THE TIME IS RIGHT FOR THIS BOOK
There are three key reasons why the time is right for a book on positive re-
lationships at work.
We Need to Build Bridges Across Silos of Scholarship
To date, our knowledge of positive work relationships has been obtained
through isolated pockets of theory and research that are scattered across
fields and disciplines. The idea of positive work relationships, for example, is
central in theories of social capital (Coleman, 1988), mentoring (Kram, 1985),
network theory (Burt, 1992), leader-member exchange (Graen & Scandura,
1987), trust (Kramer & Tyler, 1996), social support (Uchino, Cacioppo, &
Kiecolt-Glaser, 1996), learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991), and psychological
growth (Miller & Stiver, 1997). Although attention to this topic spans a broad
swath of literature, our understanding of positive relationships at work is lim-
ited by silos of scholarship that rarely speak across levels, dependent vari-
ables, or fields of inquiry. We need a platform that allows us to reflect the
richness of positive work relationships by weaving together threads from dif-
ferent disciplines, levels of analysis, and perspectives.
We Need to Put Relationships at the Foreground
of Organizational Studies
Relationships are central to the meaning and being of life. As Berscheid
(1999) so eloquently observed, "... relationships with other humans are
both the foundation and the theme of the human condition: We are born
into relationships, we live our lives in relationships with others, and when
we die, the effects of our relationships survive in the lives of the living, re-
verberating throughout the tissue of their relationships" (p. 261).
In spite of the centrality of relationships to our life experience, relation-
ships traditionally are placed in the background of organizational life ( cf.
Gersick, Bartunek, & Dutton, 2000; Kahn, 1993, 1998, chap. 10, this volume).
This perspective not only ignores the significance of workplace relation-
ships but also takes a needlessly segmented view of people in the work-
place; that although relationships are central to employees' lives they are
somehow able to turn off this need once they enter the workplace. In con-
trast, a holistic approach understands that relationships are central to life
6 RAGINS AND DUTTON
both within and outside the workplace, and that the need for authentic rela-
tionships is not left at the workplace door.
We Need to Extend Our Boundaries of Knowledge
About Relationships in Organizations
Our knowledge about relationships in organizations is limited in at least
three ways. First, the dominant theoretical paradigm that has been ap-
plied to the study of relationships, social exchange theory (e.g., Blau, 1964;
Homans, 1974), is limited in explaining processes in positive work relation-
ships. Social exchange theory views relationships as a means for exchang-
ing resources for the purpose of achieving utility or power. This perspec-
tive uses an economic model of social interactions and fails to address
communal norms evident in high-quality relationships (cf. Ragins & Verbos,
chap. 5, this volume). In addition, a social exchange perspective assumes
fixed resources and fails to acknowledge processes in positive work rela-
tionships that generate and create new resources (cf. Baker & Dutton, chap.
18, this volume), thus expanding "the pie" of individual and organizational
resources (cf. Rousseau & Ling, chap. 20, this volume).
Second, we have a limited understanding of how positive work relation-
ships interact with other aspects of social life within and outside organiza-
tions. Our research is often artificially constrained by organizational bound-
aries and we have failed to examine the effects of internal and external
communities on organizational relationships ( cf. discussion by Blatt & Cam-
den, chap. 13, this volume; McGinn, chap. 14, this volume) and behaviors
(e.g., Ragins, in press). We have not considered the symbolic meaning of re-
lationships and how work relationships become institutionalized in organi-
zational contexts and cultures ( cf. Glynn & Wrobel, chap. 17, this volume;
Golden-Biddle, GermAnn, Reay, & Procyshen, chap. 16, this volume). We
have a limited understanding of relationship building and repair (cf. Pratt &
Dirks, chap. 6, this volume) and the effects of gender, diversity, and identity
on relationships in organizations (cf. Davidson & James, chap. 7, this vol-
ume; Fletcher, chap. 19, this volume; Roberts, chap. 2, this volume).
Third, our knowledge about relationships in organizations needs to be
expanded to take into account the changing landscape of work and careers.
Workplaces and work itself are increasingly interdependent, making con-
nection the norm and relationships the means by which work occurs. Sus-
tainable organizational performance and effective individual development
are therefore increasingly dependent on the quality of relationships be-
tween people at work. In addition, with the rise of the protean career (Ar-
thur & Rousseau, 1996; Hall, 1996), employees are tied less to organizations
and more to relationships that are developmental and growth enhancing
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 7
(Ragins & Kram, in press). Consequently, loyalty and commitment to organ-
izations are grounded more on social and relational than economic bases.
Finally, as relationships take a more primary role in organizational life, we
need to be able to transform relationships from states of just "getting by"
and surviving to states of thriving ( cf. Harvey & Pauwels, 2003; Spreitzer,
Sutcliffe, Dutton, Sonenshein, & Grant, 2005).
PURPOSE OF THE BOOK:
OUR MISSION AND VISION
The goal of this book is to put Positive Relationships at Work on the re-
search map. We do this by composing a volume that builds a solid founda-
tion for this promising new area of scholarly inquiry. Our vision is to offer a
multidisciplinary exploration of how relationships at work become a source
of growth, vitality, learning, and generative states of human and collective
flourishing.
To pursue this expansive adventure we knew we had to approach this
topic from multiple levels: individual, dyadic, group, organizational, and
community. Each level offers critical and useful insights into the dynamic
and generative processes underlying positive relationships in organiza-
tions.
Although a multilevel perspective is vital for offering a comprehensive
view of positive work relationships, we also recognize the need to weave
the threads from different levels together so that we can offer readers a the-
oretical tapestry that reflects the dynamic richness of positive relationships
in the workplace. Our goal is to give our readers an invitation to engage in a
new multidisciplinary area of research, but also provide a broad perspec-
tive that allows us to build insights across levels of analysis.
Last, we want to breathe new life into established areas of scholarship by
applying a PRW lens to established areas of organizational research. We
want to inspire future scholars by offering a research agenda that links estab-
lished areas with the promising new field of positive relationships at work.
With these visions in mind, this volume is designed to meet three key ob-
jectives:
1. To establish Positive Relationships at Work as a new interdisciplinary,
multilevel domain of inquiry.
2. To facilitate the application of a Positive Relationships at Work per-
spective to new and established areas of organizational behavior, or-
ganizational theory, and organizational strategy.
8 RAGINS AND DUTTON
3. To offer an engaging invitation and multilevel map for guiding future re-
search on positive relationships at work.
We selected a stellar group of multidisciplinary scholars and invited
them to apply their knowledge, insight, and expertise toward creating a vol-
ume that achieves these ambitious objectives. In the fall of 2004 these schol-
ars, who represent such fields as interpersonal relationships, interpersonal
communication, organizational strategy, organizational theory, organiza-
tional behavior, and a variety of psychological disciplines (industrial-
organizational, clinical, community, and social psychology), came to Ann
Arbor, Michigan, to participate in a book-building conference. Our goal was
to generate a new field of research on positive relationships at work by
crafting a foundation-setting book. These vanguard scholars took this task
to heart, and the result is a collection of thought-provoking chapters that
define the emerging research domain of positive relationships at work.
Our first challenge was to define PRW. Let us now turn to an overview of
the key aspects of this construct.
DEFINING POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK
For years, interpersonal relationship scholars have struggled to define
what precisely constitutes a positive relationship ( cf. Berscheid, 1994, 1999;
Duck, 1994; Reis & Gable, 2003). We soon discovered a similar challenge in
defining positive relationships at work. Like other positive relationships ( cf.
Berscheid & Reis, 1998; Miller & Stiver, 1997; Reis & Gable, 2003), positive
work relationships can be defined in terms of the states or processes in the
relationship, the experienced quality of the relationship, or the outcomes of
the relationship. We asked the authors in this volume to try to include their
definition or perspective on positive work relationships in organizations in
their chapters, and we quickly discovered that although there is some com-
mon ground, there is also significant diversity in the approach to this con-
struct. Perhaps there is no single "best" definition of PRW that reflects an
absolute consensus across levels and disciplines. Given that the field is in
its research infancy, we believe that an expansive approach that incorpo-
rates a full range of perspectives is appropriate and needed; an approach
that opens rather than closes doors to future research.
With these caveats in mind, we would like to offer readers a basic foun-
dation for defining positive relationships at work that reflects the common
ground discovered through building this book. We then offer a brief bird's-
eye overview of how the contributors to this volume defined PRW with an
eye toward articulating some of the complexities in defining this construct.
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 9
A Foundation for Defining Positive
Relationships at Work
Focus on Relationships. At its most basic level, positive relationships
at work are relationships between individuals that can occur at the dyadic,
group, community, and organizational level. Traditionally, relationships are
defined as a sequence of interactions between two people that involves
some degree of mutuality, in that the behavior of one member takes some
account of the behavior of the other (Hinde, 1979). Relationships are dy-
namic and fluid; present interactions are affected by past interactions and
may influence future interactions. Relationships do not reside in the indi-
vidual but are reoccurring interconnections that exist within the tissue or
oscillating rhythm of interactions between two people (Berscheid, 1999).
They are therefore invisible and are often discerned by observing the ef-
fects of the relationship.
Focus on the Organizational and Work Context. Positive relation-
ships at work are a type of relationship that exists within the context of or-
ganizations, work, and careers. Positive work relationships, which some of
our contributors used interchangeably with the term positive organizational
relationships, are connected to the organization in some way, but may be sit-
uated within or outside of organizational boundaries. They may include re-
lationships between individuals who work together in the same organiza-
tion as well as relationships that are focused on work and careers that
extend beyond the organization's boundaries. Positive relationships at
work may therefore include developmental networks and mentoring rela-
tionships that span organizational boundaries, as well as relationships be-
tween individuals sharing a common profession, occupation or work com-
munity that is tied to the organization. Finally, positive relationships at
work are not restricted to face-to-face interactions; like other work relation-
ships, positive work relationships may be developed or sustained as virtual
or electronic relationships.
Focus on Positive. What distinguishes positive work relationships from
other work relationships is the notion of "positive." Although the definition
of positive varies with different disciplines, lenses, and social construc-
tions, we offer the idea of positive work relationships as a reoccurring connec-
tion between two people that takes place within the context of work and careers
and is experienced as mutually beneficial, where beneficial is defined broadly
to include any kind of positive state, process, or outcome in the relationship.
This definition, however, just brushes the surface of positive relationships
at work. The contributors to this volume flesh out this basic definition and
10 RAGINS AND DUTTON
deepen our understanding of the nuances and facets of PRW. Let us now ex-
amine how our authors defined PRW with an eye toward identifying the
common ground and complexities in defining this construct.
Approaches to Defining Positive Relationships at Work
Positive Work Relationships as High-Quality Connections. Many of the
contributors to this volume (see Heaphy, chap. 3; Higgins, chap. 11; Quinn,
chap. 4; Baker & Dutton, chap. 18) define positive relationships at work as a
high-quality connection. According to Dutton and Heaphy (2003; see also
Dutton, 2003) high-quality connections (HQCs) involve short interactions or
long-term relationships that are marked by vitality, mutuality, and positive
regard. HQCs have three key features. First, HQCs have higher emotional
carrying capacity than other relationships and interactions. Emotional carry-
ing capacity reflects the expression of more emotions as well as a greater
range of positive and negative emotions in the relationship. Second, HQCs
have greater levels of tensility, which is the relationship's ability to bend
and withstand strain in the face of challenges or setbacks. Finally, HQCs are
distinguished from other relationships and interactions by their capacity
for connectivity, which involves generativity and openness to new ideas and
influences, as well as the ability to deflect behaviors that terminate genera-
tive processes.
Experiences, Processes, and Outcomes. Other contributors offer com-
plementary perspectives by defining positive work relationships in terms of
the experience and processes of the relationship. Kahn (chap. 10, this vol-
ume) views positive work relationships as those that enable individuals to
personally engage in their work. He explains that positive work relation-
ships meet members' relational needs and allow them to be authentic, pres-
ent, and intellectually and emotionally available at work. Roberts (chap. 2,
this volume) builds on this idea by defining positive work relationships as
involving a sense of relatedness and mutuality that creates the possibility for
greater self-discovery, heightened sense of self-efficacy, and identity en-
hancement. Quinn (chap. 4, this volume) points to the importance of energy
in positive work relationships and observes that although positive relation-
ships are more than energy, without energy there could not be positive re-
lationships. Pratt and Dirks (chap. 6, this volume) remind us that positive
work relationships offer support not only when times are good, but also in
the face of adversity. They define positive relationships in terms of relation-
ship resiliency and the capacity to build and repair trust. Duck (chap. 9, this
volume) points out that, like other interpersonal relationships, positive re-
lationships at work are socially constructed relationships, and that their dy-
namic natures make them fluid works in progress rather than static final
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION II
states. Blatt and Camden (chap. 13, this volume) define positive relation-
ships in terms of positive connections that lead to feelings of inclusion, a felt
sense of being important to others, experienced mutual benefit, and shared
emotions. They contend that positive work relationships can occur in the
present and do not require a shared history or a future of interactions, al-
though other contributors disagree and hold that positive work relation-
ships require a history, a present, and an anticipated future (ct. Golden-
Biddle et al., chap. 16, this volume).
Some contributors offer guidelines for assessing whether a work rela-
tionship is positive. Applying Stone Center Relational Theory (Miller & Sti-
ver, 1997), Fletcher (chap. 19, this volume) defines positive work relation-
ships as ones in which mutual growth-in-connection has occurred, and offers
specific evaluative criteria for assessing this state. In particular, relation-
ships are positive when both members experience the "five good things" of
zest, empowered action, increased sense of worth, new knowledge and the
desire for more connection. Grounded more in organizational settings,
Greenberg (chap. 8, this volume) defines positive work relationships as
both involving and leading to states of positive organizational justice.
Teams, Organizations, and Communities. Positive relationships can
also be defined from the vantage point of relationships that are nested
within teams, organizations, and communities. Ancona and Isaacs (chap. 12,
this volume) define positive relationships in teams as a structured pattern of
interrelating that creates an overall generative pattern of healthy team func-
tioning. Golden-Biddle and her colleagues (chap. 16, this volume) define
positive organizational relationships as patterns of interacting that are
characterized by a recurring but not necessarily intimate bond in which
groups of people develop a sense of mutuality, positive regard, and respect
for one another. McGinn (chap. 14, this volume) examines work relation-
ships within positive communities, and explains that positive communities
involve networks of supportive relationships. According to McGinn, a commu-
nity is positive when its members recognize and rely on their membership
as a valuable resource.
Resource Perspective. Positive organizational relationships can also be
defined as a resource for individuals, groups, and organizations. Baker and
Dutton (chap. 18, this volume) view positive work relationships as a form of
positive social capital that expands the generative capacity of people and
groups, thereby helping them achieve their goals in new and better ways.
Through HQCs and generalized reciprocity, positive work relationships in-
crease the resource-producing capabilities of individuals and groups. Rousseau
and Ling (chap. 20, this volume) point out that positive relationships expand
the resources organizations exchange with their members; positive work re-
12 RAGINS AND DUTTON
lationships take a generative role in creating, expanding, and sustaining re-
source-rich interactions between organizations and their members.
Relationship Type. Finally, some contributors define particular types
of positive relationships in organizations, such as diverse work relation-
ships (Davidson & James, chap. 7, this volume), leader-member dyads
(Fletcher, chap. 19, this volume) and mentoring relationships (Ragins &
Verbos, chap. 5, this volume). These chapters illustrate that although there
are common themes that define positive work relationships, the type of re-
lationship plays an important role in how positive work relationships are
defined, perceived, and evaluated. For example, Davidson and James (chap.
7) point to the critical role that conflict and learning play in overcoming ste-
reotypes and developing positive relationships across differences. Along
similar lines, Fletcher (chap. 19) observes that cultural constructions of
gender influence the views, expectations, and evaluations of relationships
involving female leaders. Ragins and Verbos (chap. 5) point to the impor-
tance of relational schema and cognitive processes in members' percep-
tions, expectations, and evaluations of the quality of their relationship.
Summary. This preview illustrates the diversity and complexity in-
volved with defining positive relationships at work. Positive relationships at
work can be defined in terms of processes, experiences, and outcomes.
They can be viewed as embedded relationships that occur in groups, orga-
nizations, and communities. They can be defined in terms of meeting peo-
ple's needs-needs that continually change based on the constellation of
other relationships in the organization and community. Positive work rela-
tionships are therefore fluid relationships that evolve and change over
time, people, context, and culture. Understanding these relationships re-
quires a holistic approach that incorporates multiple levels and relation-
ships that occur outside the organizations' boundaries. Finally, the very
concept of positive may be shaped not only by the external social, organiza-
tional, and cultural context, but also by the internal, psychological, and cog-
nitive processes that drive members' perceptions, expectations, and evalu-
ations of the relationship.
Now that we have a preliminary definition of positive relationships at
work, let us turn to an overview of the structure and contents of the book.
ROADMAPFORTHEBOOK
We know that positive work relationships may both affect and be affected
by individual attributes, dyadic properties of the relationship, properties of
groups and communities, and the broader organizational context. With this
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 13
in mind, Exploring Positive Relationships at Work is organized into three parts
that span the micro-to-macro spectrum: (a) individuals and dyads, (b)
groups and communities, and (c) organizations and organizing.
A unique feature of the book is the use of a connecting commentator chap-
ter at the end of each of these three parts. The commentator chapters un-
cover and discuss integrative themes that emerge within the sections. The
commentators invited to take the lead writing these chapters (Duck, Kahn,
and Rousseau) are preeminent scholars in their respective fields, and their
connecting chapters weave together themes, theories, and perspectives
within each level of analysis.
The contributors to this volume represent a select group of scholars
who have deep expertise in their field or on some aspect of positive rela-
tionships at work. To provide coherence and integration across chapters,
we asked our authors to write their chapters with two goals in mind. First,
they were asked to integrate and build on each others' chapters across and
within levels of analysis. Our book-building conference provided a substan-
tive platform for achieving this goal, which was further reinforced by post-
ing chapter drafts on our book Web site. Second, to stress the importance
of linking their area of expertise to the new domain of positive relationships
at work, we asked contributors to address three questions in their chap-
ters. First, how does their chapter advance the construct of positive rela-
tionships at work? Second, what are the processes or mechanisms underly-
ing positive relationships at work? Last, how does their perspective on
positive relationships at work invite future research?
The book concludes with our summary chapter, which summarizes the
theoretical mechanisms underlying positive relationships at work, articu-
lates the value of a positive relationship at work perspective for organiza-
tional scholarship, and sets the course for navigating future research in this
exciting new area of inquiry.
We now focus our attention to an overview of the chapters in this book.
In particular, we offer our readers an appreciative summary that attempts
to capture the core essence and unique contributions of each chapter.
AN APPRECIATIVE SUMMARY OF THE CHAPTERS
Individual and Dyad Section
The book begins with an examination of the individual and dyadic factors
that affect and are affected by positive relationships at work. The authors in
this part break new ground and offer new perspectives on positive work re-
lationships by uncovering and exploring a rich and diverse range of topics,
such as identity, the body, energy, trust, mentoring, diversity, and justice.
14 RAGINS AND DUTTON
We start with Roberts's chapter (chap. 2), which offers critical insights
into the identity processes underlying PRW. Positive relationships are associ-
ated with a range of positive outcomes, and Roberts uncovers the identity
mechanisms that may drive this relationship. She observes that by provid-
ing psychosocial support, inspiration, and feedback, positive work relation-
ships allow individuals to learn more about the valued and distinctive as-
pects of their own identities. She suggests that positive relationships create
identity enhancement by allowing individuals to discover their sources of
strength, competence, and contributions. According to Roberts, this cre-
ates a generative process; as individuals become more aware of their
strengths, they change their self-views to be aligned with the positive ap-
praisals of others. Even more intriguing is the proposed interplay between
identity and positive relationships. Roberts identifies this as a mutually re-
inforcing cycle: As relational identities are enhanced and enriched, the rela-
tionship becomes even more positive. Her account offers a compelling ex-
planation for the mechanisms underlying positive relationships at work and
explains, from an individual perspective, how relationships can be trans-
formed from damaging disconnections to growth-enhancing connections.
Heaphy's chapter (chap. 3) breaks important new ground by examining
the relationship between PRW and the human body. Heaphy draws on a full
range of physiological literature, and her chapter opens an exciting portal
into a new area of scholarship on physiology and relationships. She pres-
ents three ways of conceptualizing the human body that offer insights into
the physiology of positive organizational relationships. First, by viewing the
body as a physiological system, she examines how organizational relation-
ships affect physical health through the mechanism of relationship quality.
Second, she examines the effects of bodily cues as subjective indicators of
the quality of the relationship. She observes that bodily cues allow individu-
als to make sense of their relationship and that the skillful use of bodily
cues is a form of interpersonal competence that emerges in positive rela-
tionships. Heaphy astutely observes that we underestimate the importance
of bodily cues in organizational life, and her analysis allows us to view the
body not as a threat to individual's work performance, but as a source of
competence. Last, she offers an assessment of how cultural contexts offer
interpretative frameworks that help individuals make sense of the role of
bodies in relationships at organizational, institutional, and societal levels.
The Heaphy chapter offers a provocative analysis of the body and thought-
ful directions for future research on the physiological outcomes associated
with positive relationships at work.
Quinn's chapter (chap. 4) analyzes the role of energy in positive connec-
tions and relationships at work. Energy is defined as a positive affective
experience involving the feeling of being eager to act and capable of act-
ing. Quinn contends that energy is necessary for the development of high
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 15
quality connections and offers a dynamic model of the reciprocal relation-
ship between energy and positive connections at work. He explains that
the quality of a connection affects the experience of energy, and energy in
turn is necessary for the development of high-quality connections. His
chapter offers a thorough and perceptive analysis of three primary mech-
anisms through which energy influences the quality of workplace connec-
tions: mutual resource creation, feedback, and attachment. These mecha-
nisms involve three ideas: that employees build new valuable resources
when they are energized, that attachment develops when parties experi-
ence energy in an interaction, and that members then use this energy as
feedback to infer information about the quality of their interaction. A key
insight from this chapter is that energy represents a source of transforma-
tion and change in relationships, and that employee energy and the qual-
ity of work connections engage in a dynamic feedback relationship that
evolves over time.
Ragins and Verbos (chap. 5) examine the natural connection between
mentoring and positive relationships at work. They observe that the field of
mentoring can inform, and be informed by, a focus on positive relationships
at work. At its best, mentoring personifies positive relationships at work,
and their chapter begins with insights from mentoring research that
deepen the understanding of positive relationships at work. They observe
that positive work relationships are needs-based relationships that are
nested within a constellation of other career relationships that may tran-
scend organizational boundaries. They explain that like mentoring relation-
ships, positive relationships at work may evolve through life cycles that
transform over time and through states of relational quality. Ragins and
Verbos then turn the table and apply a positive lens to the mentoring arena.
They critique the mentoring literature and present the construct of rela-
tional mentoring as the most positive state in the continuum of mentoring
relationships. The second part of their chapter then offers a theoretical
model of mentoring schemas that integrates relational cognition theory,
relational schema theory, and models of relational self to explicate the
processes underlying schema development and expectations in positive re-
lationships. They propose that individuals develop particularlistic and ge-
neric relational schema about positive relationships that serve as a men-
tal guide for developing and sustaining relationships. These schemas
are formed through sources of relational knowledge and involve feedback
loops that perpetuate the creation of positive relationships at work. Their
model of mentoring schemas offers a useful bridge between social cogni-
tion theory and our understanding of the psychological and cognitive proc-
esses underlying positive relationships at work.
Pratt and Dirks (chap. 6) offer a compelling appraisal of the role of trust
in positive relationships at work. They begin by observing that trust is cen-
16 RAGINS AND DUTTON
tral to all positive relationships. They go on to observe that positive rela-
tionships are more resilient than other relationships in that positive rela-
tionships can offer their members support even in the face of adversity.
Pratt and Dirks reason that if positive relationships are characterized by re-
silience, it is important to understand not only the role of trust in positive
relationships, but also the processes involved with the breaking and repair
of trust. They make the case that traditional social exchange perspectives
do not address how trust is repaired and regained in relationships, and
thus fall short in capturing processes in positive relationships. As an alter-
native to social exchange perspectives, Pratt and Dirks use a relationship-
based commitment perspective that focuses on members' commitment to
the relationship. They explain that whereas social exchange perspectives
allow for the positive and negative aspects of a relationship to cancel each
other out, a commitment-based perspective allows members to experience
both positive and negative elements simultaneously, leading to a state of
ambivalence. They contend that the resolution of this ambivalence be-
comes the fuel for trust, and that the ability to manage positive and nega-
tive elements simultaneously gives the relationship energy and resilience.
Pratt and Dirks reconceptualize trust as a volitional acceptance of the exis-
tence of both the vulnerability and the benefits associated with being in the
relationship. By offering a new lens on the building and rebuilding of trust,
this thought-provoking chapter offers a powerful explanation for the resil-
iency underlying positive relationships at work.
Davidson and James (chap. 7) tackle a critical dilemma in the diversity
arena: How can employees transform diverse relationships steeped in cyni-
cism, mistrust, and enmity into relationships that are productive, nurturing,
and energizing? They offer a key insight that this transformation occurs
through two primary mechanisms: conflict and learning. They observe that
salient differences between members in diverse (cross-difference) relation-
ships trigger schemas, stereotypes, and expectations that set the stage for
conflict. They examine the positive nature of conflict in cross-difference re-
lationships, and propose that the opportunity to transform this conflict into
learning is the only means by which high-quality relationships across differ-
ences emerge. Their chapter offers a penetrating examination of how indi-
viduals move beyond stereotypes and conflict to a learning approach. They
propose that the path to learning begins with an individual's personal expe-
riences with members of diverse groups, but is also influenced by the mem-
bers' investment in the relationship and hinges on core skills or relational
competencies that allow members to move the relationship from a state of
conflict to a state of growth, learning, and engagement. Developing high-
quality relationships across differences is often a daunting task, and this
chapter gives sharp insights into how conflict generated in diverse relation-
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 17
ships can be transformed into a generative source of learning and personal
growth.
Greenberg (chap. 8) takes a fresh perspective by applying a positive lens
to the domain of organizational justice. He observes that the field of organi-
zational justice has focused more on the avoidance of injustice than on the
attainment of justice as a positive outcome of organizational relationships.
Greenberg identifies the need to bring balance to the study of organiza-
tional justice by refocusing attention from the individual's negative reac-
tions of injustice to the positive side of the spectrum. Toward that goal, he
offers the idea of positive organizational justice, which he defines as "delib-
erate efforts to promote, enhance, and sustain perceived fairness in the
workplace in a manner that develops the positive capacities of individuals
and organizations." He reviews the three established forms of justice (dis-
tributive, procedural, and interactional) with a positive organizational jus-
tice lens and offers an incisive critique of the strengths and limitations of
these perspectives as they relate to positive relationships at work. His
chapter identifies the underlying states and conditions that promote posi-
tive organizational justice and offers the idea of a self-regenerating cycle of
positive organizational justice. This chapter offers breadth and balance to
field of organizational justice and will be a catalyst for future research on
positive organizational justice.
The part on individual and dyadic elements of positive relationships con-
cludes with an insightful commentator chapter by Duck (chap. 9). As a re-
nowned scholar in the field of personal relationships, Duck draws on more
than 20 years of scholarship to integrate the chapters in this section and to
offer a number of key insights on positive relationships at work. First, he re-
minds us that relationships exist in a state of interdependence, and al-
though the chapters in this section focus on the individual and dyadic level
of analyses, these levels are embedded in other levels involving groups, or-
ganizations, and communities. Second, he observes that relationships are
social constructions that are not inherently positive or negative. He points
out that the construct of positivity is socially grounded and therefore the
qualities associated with positive relationships reflect assumptions embed-
ded in the organization and in the broader societal context. Third, he ob-
serves that the fluid, continuous, and dynamic nature of relationships
makes them "open-ended enterprises" that reflect "unfinished business"
rather than final states. He reminds us that positivity is not a perpetual
state, but rather a predominant form of the relationship; we cannot expect
individuals to view positive relationships as positive all the time. Finally he
points out that positive work relationships differ from other types of rela-
tionships in terms of intimacy, length, and whether they are voluntarily
formed. By drawing on the related field of personal relationships, Duck's
18 RAGINS AND DUTTON
chapter deepens and broadens our understanding of positive relationships
at work.
Groups and Communities Section
In this part we shift our attention from individual and dyadic aspects of the
relationship to aspects of positive relationships that are embedded within
the broader context of groups and communities. Although relationships are
often viewed from a micro perspective, the contributors to this part push
the boundaries and expand our vision by viewing positive relationships as
nested within the context of networks, teams, groups, and communities.
We start with Kahn's chapter (chap. 10), which offers a rich analysis of
how constellations of positive relationships help workers become attached to
their organizations. He stresses the fundamental point that relationships
are central to organizational life and individual's workplace experiences. He
then identifies five dimensions of meaningful connections among people at
work (task accomplishment, career development, sense making, provision
of meaning, and personal support) and observes that these dimensions en-
able people to build relationships that meet instrumental, expressive, cog-
nitive, identity, growth, and relatedness needs. Kahn uses this framework to
examine the structure of relational constellations, which are defined as sets
of relationships that individuals draw on to meet their needs. He explains
that relational constellations vary in effectiveness, and identifies four types
of constellations that vary by scope and the degree to which they meet
members' relational needs. He makes the case that positive relational con-
stellations bring a sense of psychological attachment that generalizes to the
workplace. Kahn offers the idea that meaningful connections at work are
not only sources of attachment, but also allow workers to bring their true
authentic selves to the workplace. This conceptual insight offers exciting
new possibilities for future research on relational constellations, organiza-
tional attachment and the development of authentic selves in the work-
place.
Higgins's chapter (chap. 11) navigates new terrain by presenting a con-
tingency perspective on developmental networks and PRW. Working within
the mentoring arena, her chapter shifts the level of analysis from dyadic re-
lationships to constellations of relationships within relationship networks.
Higgins points out that prevailing perspectives on mentoring fail to exam-
ine how constellations of relationships and network structures affect a
given mentoring relationship. Whereas traditional perspectives take a
"more is better" approach and assume that the more help that is given in a
relationship the better, or that larger networks are better than smaller net-
works, Higgins observes that the helpfulness of a given mentoring relation-
ship depends on the unique needs of the protege as well as the structure
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 19
and quality of the other developmental relationships in the protege's net-
work. She uses specific scenarios to illustrate her contingency framework.
Under this framework, developmental relationships are affected not only by
the needs of the individual but also by the patterns of other relationships
that exist within social arenas involving work, home, community, and pro-
fessional associations. Her chapter highlights the interdependence of rela-
tionships as embedded within social networks and offers a much-needed
holistic perspective on the development of positive relationships across
work, life and professional arenas.
Ancona and Isaacs (chap. 12) take a bold step across disciplines by using
family systems theory as a paradigm for understanding the positive side of
teams. They start by critiquing traditional models of team functioning. They
point out that these models are mechanistic and take a narrow input-proc-
ess-output perspective in which the whole is viewed as the sum of its parts.
Under this view, the key to high-performing teams involves simply moving
or changing a given part (i.e., putting the right people on the team, offering
the right incentive, or changing a given behavior), thus failing to analyze
the underlying structures that create team behavior or explain the genera-
tive processes that characterize effective teams. Ancona and Issacs address
these deficits by offering an alternative paradigm: a "living system" per-
spective on teams. Under this view, teams are seen as living, self-regulating
systems that reflect on their own functioning and engage in creative ac-
tions that lead to generative processes and structural balance. Ancona and
Isaacs explain that a positive or balanced team has a set of structures that
continuously monitor, correct, and produce healthy team outcomes. They
develop this idea by applying a family systems lens, which views families
in terms of self-regulating systems. Using the family systems "four-player
model," Ancona and Issacs examine how four central acts that occur in
teams work together to create a system of structural balance and health in
teams. They explain that it is not just the existence of all four acts, but the
unique sequence and dynamics across acts that determine team effective-
ness. By using family systems theory to understand team dynamics, this in-
novative chapter expands our vision and understanding of positive rela-
tionships in teams.
Blatt and Camden (chap. 13) explore the role of positive relationships in
cultivating a sense of community at work. Their chapter addresses a press-
ing dilemma in the new economy: Given the increase in temporary workers,
how can organizations cultivate a sense of community among workers who
have no past, no future, and no membership in the organization? Blatt and
Camden explain that a sense of community, which is defined as a subjective
state of belonging, meets workers' fundamental needs of belonging and of-
fers a powerful source of attachment and connection to the organization.
However, they observe that the methods used to cultivate community with
20 RAGINS AND DUTTON
permanent workers (i.e., strengthening markers of identity and culture) ex-
clude rather than include temporary employees. Blatt and Camden used in-
depth interviews to uncover the experience of community among tempo-
rary employees, and found that temporary workers' sense of community is
developed through small acts of positive connecting with other coworkers,
rather than through the macro-organizational practices that are frequently
used with permanent workers. They found that temporary workers re-
ported that their sense of community did not develop over time, nor was it
expected to last; it developed swiftly and involved positive in-the-moment
connections that offered feelings of inclusion, a felt sense of importance,
perceptions of mutual benefits, and the experience of shared emotions.
Their study illustrates that positive connections can enable the experience
of belonging at work, even in the absence of a shared past or an anticipated
future. This chapter offers critical insights for understanding how positive
relationships at work influence community in workforces blended with per-
manent, temporary, part-time, and virtual workers. It also points to the fact
that even as work life becomes infused with discontinuity, people's need for
positive relationships remains constant.
McGinn (chap. 14) further extends our vision of positive relationships at
work by offering an analysis of the role of positive communities in workers'
lives. She explains that a community is a set of individuals that share or
hold something in common, and may therefore be geographical, concep-
tual, or behavioral. McGinn uses a case study of a community of longshore-
men in San Pedro, California, to examine how positive communities help
workers deal with external changes that threaten their livelihoods and life-
styles. She observes that positive communities are characterized by mutu-
ally supportive relationships that are recognized as a valuable resource by
their members. McGinn discovered that through shared history, shared
structure, and shared communication practices, positive communities offer
workers a source of identity, a base for interpretation of events and a chan-
nel of influence. Her rich analysis illustrates that communities can shape
the ways members think about themselves and one another, their work,
and their workplaces. This chapter offers the valuable insight that the posi-
tive relationships developed in communities can be a tangible, vital, and in-
fluential force in the workplace, and further dispels the notion of non-
permeable work-community boundaries.
Drawing on the chapters in this section, Kahn's commentator chapter
(chap. 15) identifies the underlying conditions that create and sustain posi-
tive relationships in groups and communities. He observes that positive
relationships at work sustain, and are sustained by, work groups and com-
munities. He explains that groups and communities sustain positive rela-
tionships by offering their members good harbors that offer shelter from the
storms of organizational life. Good harbors allow people to work with each
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 21
other in bounded and safe ways, allow them to be vulnerable and authentic,
and offer shape and meaning to their work experiences. Kahn offers the
core insight that positive relationships in groups and communities are cre-
ated through positive spirals, endlessly looping positive acts that are ongo-
ing, self-regulating, and self-perpetuating. He explains that positive spirals
are marked by "begetting"-a positive movement from one group or com-
munity begets another until the acts take on a life of their own and become
woven into the life of the group or community. Through positive acts,
groups and communities create an abundance of connection with one an-
other, stockpiling goodwill and positive energy that members can draw on
in the course of their work. In this thoughtful and perceptive chapter, Kahn
reminds us that positive relationships are difficult to create and sustain,
and that they are both "a marvelous and a fragile thing."
Organizations and Organizing Section
The final part of the book approaches positive work relationships from an
organizational level and tackles the challenge of exploring how organiza-
tions affect, and are affected by, positive relationships at work. By viewing
positive relationships through a macro lens, this section offers an impor-
tant bridge between positive relationships and such topics as organiza-
tional culture, identity, effectiveness, and change.
Golden-Biddle et al. (chap. 16) leads off this section with a rich examina-
tion of the complex dynamics underlying the relationship between organiza-
tional culture and positive relationships at work. They explain that culture
consists of symbolic forms through which individuals experience and ex-
press meaning in the workplace. Symbolic forms are representations in-
volving language, goals, beliefs, and mission. Their case analysis of a Cana-
dian health care organization offers keen insights into how cultural symbols
shape organizational members' capacity to cultivate and sustain positive
organizational relationships. Golden-Biddle and her colleagues discovered
that culture not only shapes positive relationships, but that positive rela-
tionships shape culture by keeping symbolic forms alive and reinfusing
them with meaning and significance. When capitalized on by leaders, this
interdependence helped the organization transition through times of tur-
moil and change. These scholars found that positive relationships became
a life-enriching and energy-producing resource that broadened organiza-
tional members' repertoires for dealing with change, and helped members
reframe experiences from helplessness and lack of control to hope and pur-
poseful action. This chapter offers the critical perspective that positive
work relationships affect not only dyads and groups, but are also cultural
products with symbolic meaning that can reflect and revitalize organiza-
tional culture.
22 RAGINS AND DUTTON
Glynn and Wrobel (chap. 17) break important new ground by applying an
institutional perspective to the study of positive family relationships at
work. Their chapter examines the identity and institutional mechanisms
that make family relationships an endogenous resource for organizations. En-
dogenous resources come from within the organization, usually through its
people or cultural values. Glynn and Wrobel propose that family relation-
ships can give an organization an identity when the family of the founder,
CEO, or other prominent figure is displayed as part of the identity of the or-
ganization (e.g., Levi-Strauss, Harley-Davidson, Hewlett-Packard). According
to Glynn and Wrobel, these positive family relationships become a form of
social capital for the organization; they signal the firm's expertise, abun-
dance, and trustworthiness. Glynn and Wrobel propose that positive family
relationships can characterize, enliven, and legitimate a firm and its offer-
ings to public audiences. The chapter addresses a critical gap in the litera-
ture by examining how organizational identities are grounded in personal
identities that spring from positive family relationships. Their analysis of
how identity mechanisms claim familial relationships as core attributes of
the firm offers an innovative appraisal of the intertwining of personal and
organizational identities. Another creative aspect of the chapter is their use
of institutional theory to understand how institutional mechanisms serve to
graft one social institution (family) to another (the firm). This chapter offers
a fresh theoretical perspective on the use of positive family relationships as
an endogenous resource over the life cycle of the firm and makes an impor-
tant link between institutional and identity theory and organizational out-
comes associated with PRW.
Baker and Dutton (chap. 18) expands our understanding of positive rela-
tionships at work by offering a new framework for understanding how social
mechanisms and organizational practices foster the development of positive
social capital at work. They start with introducing the concept of positive so-
cial capital. They explain that social capital is positive if it expands the gen-
erative capacity of individuals and groups and helps them achieve their
personal and professional goals in new and better ways. They then explore
how two forms of positive social capital (high-quality connections and reci-
procity) increase the resource-producing capabilities of individuals and
groups. A key insight of this chapter is the connection between positive so-
cial capital and organizational practices. Baker and Dutton offer the idea
that different organizational practices activate and affirm employees' moti-
vation to participate in generative connections and systems of relation-
ships. They ground this framework by identifying clusters of human re-
source practices (selection, socialization, evaluation, rewards) as well as
other everyday work practices (conduct of meetings, collaborative technol-
ogies, practices of interpersonal helping) that, through motivation and op-
portunity mechanisms, enable the development of positive social capital in
1. POSITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AT WORK: AN INTRODUCTION 23
organizations. This chapter offers a powerful framework for understanding
how organizational systems and patterns of "everyday doing" can create or
destroy positive social capital in organizations.
Fletcher (chap. 19) brings a vital new lens to the topic by conceptualizing
leadership as a type of positive work relationship that is influenced by gen-
der, power, and societal dynamics. The chapter applies a psychological
model of human growth and development, the Stone Center relational the-
ory (SRT), to the leadership arena to develop the concept of relational lead-
ership. Fletcher explores the components of relational leadership, and pro-
poses that it influences the relational climate of organizations through a
spiraling process that leads to relational outcomes at multiple organiza-
tional levels. A key contribution of this chapter is its emphasis on societal
factors that affect positive relationships at work. SRT offers a feminist orien-
tation that deals directly with the issue of power differences in relational in-
teractions, and Fletcher applies this perspective to leadership relation-
ships. Fletcher explains that relational behaviors may be misinterpreted as
displays of powerlessness for women and other groups with a history of
less power in society. The experience and consequences of relational lead-
ership may therefore be affected by the power associated with group
membership. This chapter offers the necessary insight that systemic soci-
etal dynamics associated with power and group membership may influence
organizational members' ability to develop, nurture, and sustain PRW.
The last part of this volume concludes with a commentator chapter by
Rousseau and Ling (chap. 20) that deepens our understanding of positive
relationships at work as a resource for organizations. Drawing on the chap-
ters in this part, Rousseau and Ling offer an incisive analysis of the connec-
tion between positive organizational relationships and the resources ex-
changed by organizations and their members. They observe that positive
organizational relationships are a critical form of resource exchange that
serves as an intervening mechanism between situational and individual fea-
tures and organizational responses. They capture the idea that positive
work relationships make their participants "resource-rich" by creating effi-
ciencies in the use of resources and by generating new resources that are
scarce and valued. Rousseau and Ling point to the generative essence of
positive organizational relationships, and make the critical point that posi-
tive relationships "substantially multiply the potentialities of people and or-
ganizations" and are generative in their ability to expand the array of avail-
able organizational resources ("the pie"). Their chapter also offers an
interesting historical perspective by pointing out that a positive relation-
ship at work perspective reclaims and resurrects themes of human growth
and development that were prevalent in organizational research in the
1950s but were downplayed as organizational studies moved from social
sciences to business schools. This insightful chapter not only illustrates the
24 RAGINS AND DUTTON
mechanisms through which positive work relationships create resources in
organizations, but also highlights the importance of reclaiming a humanis-
tic perspective that recognizes the influence of positive relationships in or-
ganizational life.
THE INVITATION
As this appreciative overview illustrates, the chapters in this volume offer a
rich and multilayered foundation for building and nourishing positive rela-
tionships at work as a new field of inquiry. As a multidisciplinary and multi-
level area of scholarship, PRW offers an abundant vista of exciting new re-
search possibilities. We invite you to join us in exploring this promising
new research frontier.
REFERENCES
Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.). (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment princi-
ple for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baker, W., Cross, R., & Wooten, M. (2003). Positive organizational network analysis and energiz-
ing relationships. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational
scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 328-342). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79-129.
Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 26Q-266.
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, &
G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 193-281). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cameron, K. S., & Caza, A. (2004).1ntroduction: Contributions to the discipline of positive organi-
zational scholarship. The American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 731-739.
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Foundations of positive organizational schol-
arship. InK. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship:
Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 3-13). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociol-
ogy, 94(Suppl.), S95-Sl20.
Duck, S. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dutton, J. E. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality connections at
work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. InK. S. Cameron, J. E.
Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline
(pp. 263-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Gersick, C. J., Bartunek, J. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Learning from academia: The importance of
relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1026-1045.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L.
Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175-208).
Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Positive Relationships at Work
Arthur, M. B. , & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.). (1996). The boundaryless career: A new
employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baker, W. , Cross, R. , & Wooten, M. (2003). Positive organizational network analysis and
energizing relationships. In K. S. Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive
organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 328-342). San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler.
Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79-129.
Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260-
266.
Berscheid, E. , & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert , S. T.
Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 193-
281). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cameron, K. S. , & Caza, A. (2004). Introduction: Contributions to the discipline of positive
organizational scholarship. The American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 731-739.
Cameron, K. S. , Dutton, J. E. , & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Foundations of positive organizational
scholarship. In K. S. Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational
scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 3-13). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of
Sociology, 94 (Suppl), S95-S120.
Duck, S. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Dutton, J. E. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality
connections at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dutton, J. E. , & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. In K. S.
Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship:
Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 263-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Gersick, C. J. , Bartunek, J. M. , & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Learning from academia: The
importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1026-
1045.
Graen, G. B. , & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L.
Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175-208).
Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Hall, D. T. (1996). Protean careers of the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive,
10(4), 8-16.
Harvey, J. H. , & Pauwels, B. G. (2003). The ironies of positive psychology. Psychological
Inquiry, 14, 125-128.
Hinde, R. A. (1979). Towards understanding relationships. New York: Academic.
Homans, G. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace &
Jovanovich.
Kahn, W. A. (1993). Caring for the caregivers: Patterns of organizational caregiving.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 539-563.
Kahn, W. A. (1998). Relational systems at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20,
39-76.
Kram, K. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life.
Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Kramer, R. M. , & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.). (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lave, J. , & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 23, 695-706.
Luthans, F. , & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital
management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33,
143-160.
Miller, J. B. , & Stiver, I. (1997). The healing connection. Boston: Beacon Press.
Ragins, B. R. (in press). Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of
disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Academy of Management Review.
Ragins, B. R. , & Kram, K. (Eds.), (in press). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory,
research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Reis, H. T. , & Gable, S. L. (2003). Toward a positive psychology of relationships. In C. L. M.
Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 129-159).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Seligman, M. E. P. , & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction.
American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
Snyder, C. R. , & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of positive psychology. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Spreitzer, G. , Sutcliffe , K, Dutton, J. , Sonenshein, S. , & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially
embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537-553.
Uchino, B. , Cacioppo, J. T. , & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996). The relationship between social
support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms
and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488-531.
From Proving to Becoming
Aron, A. (2003). Self and close relationships. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.),
Handbook of self and identity (pp. 442-461). New York: Guilford.
Ashford, S. J. , Blatt, R. , & Van de Walle, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A
review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management,
29, 773-799.
Ashforth, B. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baretto, M. , & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and
self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological
Bulletin, 91, 3-26.
Baumeister, R. , Bratslavsky, E. , Muraven, M. , & Tice, D. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the
active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
Baumeister, R. F. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal
attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
Bell, E. L. (1990). The bicultural life experience of career-oriented Black women. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 11, 459-477.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. I. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic
Books.
Branscombe, N. R. , & Ellemers, N. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination:
Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In J. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The
target’s perspective (pp. 243-266). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Coping with threatened identities. New York: Metheum.
Clair, J. , Beatty, J. , & Maclean, T. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing
invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30, 78-95.
Cohen, G. , L., Steele , C., & Ross, L. (1999). The mentor’s dilemma: Providing critical
feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1302-1318.
Cole, T. , & Taboul, J. C. (2004). Non-zero-sum collaboration, reciprocity, and the preference
for similarity: Developing an adaptive model of close relational functioning. Personal
Relationships, 11, 135-160.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribners.
Crocker, J. , & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties
of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
Crocker, J. , & Park, L. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130,
392-414.
Crocker, J. , Voelkl, K. , Testa, M. , & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: Affective
consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60,
218-228.
Dabos, G. , & Rousseau, D. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts
of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 52-72.
Darley, J. , & Fazio, R. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social
interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35(10), 867-881.
Davis, M. , Conklin, L. , Smith, A. , & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective-taking on the
cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 70, 713-726.
Devine, P. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
Drigotas, S. , Rusbult , C, Wieselquist, J. , & Whitton, S. W. (1999). Close partner as sculptor
of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 293-323.
Dutton, J. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high quality
connections at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dutton, J. E. , & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). Coming to life: The power of high quality connections
at work. In K. Cameron , J. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship
(pp. 263-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
Ellemers, N. , Spears, R. , & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of
Psychology, 53, 161-186.
Ely, R. , & Meyerson, D. (2006). Unmasking manly men: The organizational reconstruction of
men’s identity. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management Meetings.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American
Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
Fletcher, J. (1998). Relational practice: A feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 7, 163-186.
Foner, P. S. (Ed.). (1972). Speech by Martin Luther King, Jr. at Indiana University. In P. S.
Foner (Ed.), The voice of Black America. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology,
2, 300-319.
Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The dynamics of taking charge. Boston: Harvard Business School
Press.
Galinsky, A. , Ku, J. , & Wang, C. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap:
Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes and Intergroup
Relations, 8, 109-124.
Galinsky, A. , & Moskovic, G. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression,
stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 78, 708-724.
Galper, R. E. (1976). Turning observers into actors: Differential causal attributions as a
function of “empathy.” Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 328-335.
Gecas, V. (1982). The self concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1-33.
Gersick, C. , Bartunek, J. , & Dutton, J. (2000). Learning from academia: The importance of
relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1026-1044.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Doubleday.
Grant, H. , & Dweck, C. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
Higgins, M. C. (2001). Changing careers: The effects of social context. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 22, 595-618.
Higgins, M. C. , & Kram, K. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental
network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 264-288.
Hilton, J. , & Darley, J. (1985). Constructing other persons: A limit on the effect. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 1-18.
Ibarra, H. (2003). Working identity: Unconventional strategies for reinventing your career.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity and diversity of social circles in management networks.
Academy of Management Journal, 18, 56-87.
Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional
adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764-791.
Jones, E. (1964). Ingratiation: A social psychological analysis. New York, Appleton-Century-
Crofts.
Jones, E. , & Pittman, T. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J.
Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45,
321-349.
Kahn, W. A. (2001). Holding environments at work. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
37, 260-279.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kernis, M. , & Johnson, E. (1990). Current and typical self-appraisals: Differential
responsiveness to evaluative feedback and implications for emotions. Journal of Research in
Personality, 24, 241-257.
Kram, K. (1996). A relational approach to career development. In D. T. H. A. Associates
(Ed.), The career is dead—Long live the career (pp. 132-157). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kumashiro, M. , & Sedikides, C. (2005). Taking on board liability-focused information: Close
positive relationships as a self-bolstering resource. Psychological Science, 16, 732-739.
Lawrence, P. R. , & Nohria, N. (2002). Driven: How human nature shapes our choices. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Leary, M. R. , & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and
two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
Lord, C. G. , & Saenz, D. S. (1985). Memory deficits and memory surfeits: Differential
cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 49, 918-926.
Luft, J. (1984). Group process: An introduction to group dynamics. Mountain View, CA:
Mayfield.
Lundgren, D. C. (2004). Social feedback and self-appraisals: Current status of the Mead-
Cooley hypothesis. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 267.
Malloy, T. , Albright, L. , Kenny, D. , Agatstein, F. , & Winquist, L. (1997). Interpersonal
perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 72, 390-398.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Ed.
with intro by C. W. Morris ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mehra, A. , Kilduff, M. , & Brass, D. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the
social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management
Journal, 41, 441-452.
Miller, C. T. , & Myers, A. (1998). Compensating for prejudice: How heavyweight people (and
others) control outcomes despite prejudice. In C. Stangor & J. Swim (Eds.), Prejudice: The
target’s perspective (pp. 191-218). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Miller, C. T. , Rothblum, E. , Felicio, D. , & Brand, P. (1995). Compensating for stigma:
Obese and nonobese women’s reactions to being visible. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 21, 1093-1106.
Miller, J. B. , & Stiver, I. P. (1997). The healing connection: How women form relationships in
therapy and life. Boston: Beacon Press.
Milton, L. , & Westphal, J. (2005). Identity confirmation networks and cooperation in work
groups. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 191-212.
Parker, S. , & Axtell, C. (2001). Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of
employee perspective-taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1085-1100.
Polzer, J. , Milton, L. , & Swann, W. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal
congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-324.
Regan, D. T. , & Totten, J. (1975). Empathy and attributions: Turning actors into observers.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 850-856.
Reis, H. , & Patrick, B. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T.
Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New
York: Guilford.
Roberson, L. , Deitch, E. , Brief, A. , & Block, C. (2003). Stereotype threat and feedback
seeking in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 176-188.
Roberts, L. M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse
organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30, 685-711.
Roberts, L. M. , Dutton, J. , Spreitzer, G. , Heaphy, E. , & Quinn, R. (2005). Composing the
reflected best-self portrait: Building pathways toward becoming extraordinary in work
organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 712-736.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self New York: Basic Books.
Rosenfeld, P. , Giacalone, R. , & Riordan, C. (2001). Impression management: Building and
enhancing reputations at work. New York: International Thompson Business Press.
Rosenfeld, P. , Giacalone, R. , & Riordan, C. (1995). Impression management in
organizations: Theory, measurement and practice. New York: Routledge.
Rousseau, D. , Sitkin, S. , Burt, R. , & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-
discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-405.
Schlenker, B. R. (2003). Self-presentation. In M. Leary & J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self
and identity (pp. 492-518). New York: Guilford.
Shih, M. (2003). Positive stigma: Examining resilience and empowerment in overcoming
stigma. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 175-185.
Snyder, M. , & Stukas, A. A. J. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive,
motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 50,
273-303.
Staw, B. M. , Sandelands, L. E. , & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in
organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261-302.
Steele, C. (2004). Kenneth B. Clark’s context and mine: Toward a context-based theory of
social identity threat. In G. Philogene (Ed.), Racial identity in context: The legacy of Kenneth
B. Clark (Decade of Behavior) (pp. 61-74). Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Steele, C. M. , & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance
of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
Stone, D. , Patton, B. , & Heen, S. (1999). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what
matters most. New York: Penguin Putnam.
Swann, W. B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality &
Social Psychology, 53, 1038-1051.
Swann, W. B. , Polzer, J. , Seyle, D. , & Ko, S. (2004) Finding value in diversity: Verification
of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of Management Review, 29, 9-
27.
Tedeschi, J. T. , & Melburg, V. (1984). Impression management and influence in the
organization. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 3, 31-58.
Thomas, D. (1993). Racial dynamics in cross-race developmental relationships.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 169-194.
Tice, D. M. , & Wallace, H. (2003). The reflected self: Creating yourself as (you think) others
see you. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 91-105).
New York: Guilford.
Williams, M. (2001). Seeing through the client’s eyes: Building interpersonal trust,
cooperation, and performance across organizational boundaries. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Young, A. , & Perrewe, P. (2000). What did you expect? An examination of career-related
support and social support among mentors and proteges. Journal of Management, 26, 611-
632.
Bodily Insights
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender
and Society, 42, 139-158.
Adam, E. K. (2005). Momentary emotions and physiological stress levels in the everyday
lives of working parents. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart:
Dualcareer families and the work-life balance (pp. 105-133). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Adam, E. , & Gunnar, M. (2001). Relationship functioning and home and work demands
predict individual differences in diurnal cortisol patterns in women.
Psychoneuroendocrinology, 26, 189-208.
Baker, W. , Cross, R. & Wooten, M. (2003). Positive organizational network analysis. In K. E.
Cameron , J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 328-
342). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.
Barley, S. R. , & Kunda, G. (2004). Gurus, hired guns, and warm bodies: Itinerant experts in
a knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baron, J. N. , & Pfeffer, J. (1994). The social psychology of organizations and inequality.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 190-209.
Barsade, S. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group
behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644-675.
Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of
oppression. New York: Routledge.
Bloor, L. E. , Uchino, B. N. , Hicks, A. , & Smith, T. W. (2004). Social relationships and
physiological function: The effects of recalling social relationships on cardiovascular
reactivity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 29-38.
Bordo, S. (1988). Anorexia nervosa: Psychopathology as the crystallization of culture. In I.
Diamond & L. Quinby (Eds.), Feminism and Foucault (pp. 87-118). Boston: Northeastern
University Press.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Bradbury, H. , & Bergmann Lichtenstein, B. M. (2000). Relationality in organizational
research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science, 11, 551-564.
Broadhead, E. W. , Kaplan, B. H. , James, S. A. , Wagner, E. H. , Schoenbach, V. J. ,
Grimson, R. , et al. (1983). The epidemiological evidence for a relationship between social
support and health. American Journal of Epidemiology, 117, 521-537.
Brondolo, E. , Rieppi, R. , Erickson, S. A. , Bagiella, E. , Shapiro, P. A. , McKinley, P. , et al.
(2003). Hostility, interpersonal interactions, and ambulatory blood pressure. Psychosomatic
Medicine, 65, 1003-1011.
Brown, J. G. , Trinkoff, A. , Rempher, K. , McPhaul, K. , Brady, B. , Lipscomb, J. , et al.
(2005). Nurses’ inclination to report work-related injuries: Organizational, work-group, and
individual factors associated with reporting. AAOHN Journal, 53, 213-217.
Cameron, K. S. , Dutton, J. E. , & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Foundations of positive organizational
scholarship. In K. E. Cameron , J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational
scholarship (pp. 3-13). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.
Casey, C. (2000). Sociology sensing the body: Revitalizing a disassociate discourse. In J.
Hassard , R. Holliday , & H. Wilmott (Eds.), Body and organization (pp. 52-70). London:
Sage.
Cohen, S. , & Syme, S. L. (1984). Social support and health. Orlando, FL: Academic.
Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of
empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Dellinger, K. , & Williams, C. L. (1997). Makeup at work: Negotiating appearance rules in the
workplace. Gender & Society, 11, 155-177.
Del Vecchio Good, M. (1992). Work as a haven from pain. In M. Del Vecchio Good , P. E.
Brodwin , B. J. Good , & A. Kleinman (Eds.), Pain as a human experience (pp. 49-76).
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Douglas, M. (1996). Natural symbols: Exploration in cosmology (2nd ed.). New York:
Routledge.
Dressier, W. W. , Balieiro, M. C. , & Dos Santos, J. E. (1997). The cultural construction of
social support in Brazil: Associations with health outcomes. Culture, Medicine, Psychiatry,
21, 303-335.
Dutton, J. E. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality
connections at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dutton, J. E. , Ashford, S. , Lawrence, K. A. , & Miner-Rubino, K. (2002). Red light, green
light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue-selling. Organization Science, 13,
355-369.
Dutton, J. E. , & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. In K. E.
Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 263-
278). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.
Early, P. C. , & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures.
Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
Ely, R. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on
relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203-238.
Ely, R. (1995). The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at
work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589-634.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational psychology. American Journal of Sociology,
103, 281-317.
Epel, E. , McEwen, B. S. , & Ickovics, J. R. (1998). Embodying psychological thriving:
Physical thriving in response to stress. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 301-322.
Field, T. (2001). Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Field, T. , Ironson, G. , Scafidi, F. , Nawrocki, T. , Goncalves, A. , Burman, I. , et al. (1996).
Massage therapy reduces anxiety and enhances EEG pattern of alertness and math
computations. International Journal of Neuroscience, 86, 197-205.
Fletcher, B. C. , & Jones, F. (1993). A refutation of Karasek’s demand-discretion model of
occupational stress with a range of dependent measures. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 14, 319-300.
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology,
2, 300-319.
Fredrickson, B.L. , & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding
women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21,
173-206.
Gersick, C. J. G. , Bartunek, J. , & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Learning from academia: The
importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1026-
1044.
Ghorpade, J. (2000). Managing five paradoxes of 360-degree feedback. Academy of
Management Executive, 14, 140-154.
Giuffre, P. A. , & Williams, C. L. (2000). Not just bodies: Strategies for desexualizing the
physical examination of patients. Gender & Society, 14, 457-482.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of
Psychology, 49, 169-197.
Gottman, J. M. , Coan, J. , Carrere, S. , & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness
and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5-22.
Granger, D. A. , Kivlighan, K. T. , Blair , C, El-Sheikh, M. , Mize, J. , Lisonbee, J. A. , et al.
(2006). Integrating the measurement of salivary A-amylase into studies of child health,
development, and social relationships. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 23,
267-290.
Granger, D. A. , & Shirtcliffe, E. A. (2005). Commentary. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.),
Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work-life balance (pp. 134-137).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grebow, H. (2004, November). Seeing with our senses. Paper presented at the 27th annual
conference on the Psychology of the Self, Los Angeles.
Gregg, N. (1993). “Trying to put first things first”: Negotiating subjectivities in a workplace
organizing campaign. In S. Fisher & K. Davis (Eds.), Negotiating at the margins: The
gendered discourses of power and resistance (pp. 172-204). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University Press.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Heaphy, E. D. , & Dutton, J. E. (2006). Positive social interactions and the human body at
work: Linking organizations and physiology (Working paper). Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan.
Heaphy, E. D. (2005, August). Enriching the construct of engagement: Physiological
correlates and sensory awareness of the body. Paper presented at the 2005 National
Academy of Management meetings, Honolulu, HI.
Herek, G. M. (1996). Why tell if you’re not asked? Self-disclosure, intergroup contact, and
heterosexuals’ attitude toward lesbians and gay men. In G. M. Herek , J. B. Jobe , & R. M.
Carney (Eds.), Out in force: Sexual orientation in the military (pp. 197-225). Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Herek, G. M. , Jobe, J. B. , & Carney, R. M.. (1996). Out in force: Sexual orientation in the
military. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hertenstein, M. J. (2002). Touch: Its communicative functions in infancy. Human
Development, 45, 70-94.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). Managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
House, J. S. , Landis, K. R. , & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health.
Science, 241, 540-545.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and
access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity and diversity of social circles in managerial networks.
Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joplin, J. R. W. , Nelson, D. L. , & Quick, J. C. (1999). Attachment behavior and health:
Relationships at work and home. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 783-196.
Kahn, W. A. (2001). Holding environments at work. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
37, 260-279.
Kanov, J. (2005). Re-envisioning feeling and relating at work: An inductive study of
interpersonal disconnection in organizational life. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Karasek, R. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for
job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285-308.
Karasek, R. , & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction
of working life. New York: Basic Books.
Karlin, W. A. , Brondolo, E. , & Schwartz, J. (2003). Workplace social support and ambulatory
cardiovascular activity in New York City traffic agents. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 167-176.
Kasulis, T. P. , Ames, R. T. , & Dissanayake, W. (1993). Self as body in Asian theory and
practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. , Bane , C, Glaser, R. , & Malarkey, W. B. (2003). Love, marriage, and
divorce: Newlyweds’ stress hormones foreshadow relationship changes. Journal of
Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 71, 176-188.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. , & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers.
Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472-503.
Kosfeld, M. , Heinrichs, M. , Zak, P. J. , Fischbacher, U. , & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin
increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673-676.
Lennie, I. (2000). Embodying management. In J. Hassard , R. Holliday , & H. Wilmott (Eds.),
Body and organization (pp. 130-146). London: Sage.
Lepsinger, R. , & Lucia, A. D. (1997). The art and science of 360° feedback. San Francisco:
Pfeiffer.
Levy, S. M. , Herberman, R. B. , Whiteside, T. , Sanzo, K. , Lee, J. , & Kirkwood, J. (1990).
Perceived social support and tumor estrogen/progesterone receptor status as predictors of
natural killer cell activity in breast cancer patients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 52, 73-85.
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on the body. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272-292.
Major, B. , Schmidlin, A. M. , & Williams, L. (1990). Gender patterns in social touch: The
impact of setting and age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 634-643.
Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marx, K. (1977). Capital: Vol. 1. ( B. Fowkes , Trans.). New York: Vintage.
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception ( C. Smith , Trans.). New York:
Humanities Press.
Meyerson, D. E. (1994). Interpretation of stress in institutions: The cultural production of
ambiguity and burnout. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 628-653.
Meyerson, D. E. (1998). Feeling stressed and burned out: A feminist reading and revisioning
of stress-based emotions within medicine and organization science. Organization Science, 9,
103-118.
Neugarten, D. A. , & Shafritz, J. M. (1980). Sexuality in organizations: Romantic and coercive
behaviors at work. Oak Park, IL: Moore.
Pennebaker, J. W. (1983). Physical symptoms and sensations: Causes and correlates. In J.
Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 543-564). New York: Guilford
Press.
Plessner, H. (1970). Laughing and crying: A study of the limits of human behavior. Evanston,
IL: Northwestern University Press.
Pratt, M. , & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In K. E.
Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 309-
327). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.
Rafaeli, A. , Dutton, J. , Harquail, C. V. , & Mackie- Lewis, S. (1997). Navigating by attire: The
use of dress by female administrative employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 9-
45.
Ragins, B. R. (2004). Sexual orientation in the workplace: The unique work and career
experiences of gay, lesbian and bisexual workers. Research in Personnel and Human
Resources Management, 23, 35-120.
Riordan, D. C. (2004). Interaction strategies of lesbian, gay, and bisexual healthcare
practitioners in the clinical examination of patients: Qualitative study. British Medical Journal,
328, 1227-1229.
Roberts, L. M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse
organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 685-711.
Roberts, L. M. , Spreitzer, G. , Dutton, J. E. , Quinn, R. , Heaphy, E. D. , & Barker, B. (2005).
How to play to your strengths. Harvard Business Review, 74-80.
Roberts, T. A. , & Pennebaker, J. W. (1995). Women’s and men’s strategies in perceiving
internal state. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp.
143-176). New York: Academic.
Sandelands, L. E. (2003). Thinking about social life. Lanham, MD: University Press of
America.
Schultz, V. (2003). The sanitized workplace. The Yale Law Journal, 112, 2061-2193.
Seeman, T. (2001). How do others get under our skin?: Social relationships and health. In C.
D. Ryff & B. Singer (Eds.), Emotion, social relationships and health (pp. 189-210). New York:
Oxford University.
Semmer, N. K. , Grebner, S. , & Elfering, A. (2004). Beyond self-report: Using observational,
physiological, and situation-based measures in research on occupational stress. In P. L.
Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Emotional and physiological processes and positive
intervention strategies: Research in occupational stress and well-being (pp. 205-263).
Boston: JAI.
Shawver, L. (1996). Sexual modesty, the etiquette of disregard, and the question of gays and
lesbians in the military. In G. M. Herek , J. B. Jobe , & R. M. Carney (Eds.), Out in force:
Sexual orientation in the military (pp. 226-244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sias, P. M. , Heath, R. G. , Perry, T. , Silva, D. , & Fix, B. (2004). Narratives of workplace
friendship deterioration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 321-340.
Smith, C. (2004). Relational attunement: Internal and external reflections on harmonizing
with clients. In D. A. Pare & G. Lamer (Eds.), Collaborative practice in psychology and
therapy (pp. 85-96). Binghampton, NY: Haworth Clinical Practice Press.
Stack, D. M. (2001). The salience of touch and physical contact during infancy: Unraveling
some of the mysteries of the somaesthetic sense. In G. Bremner & A. Fogel (Eds.), Blackwell
handbook of infant development: Part 11. Social, emotional and communicative development
(pp. 351-378). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review,
51, 273-286.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S.
Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago:
Nelson.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Thomas, D. A. (1989). Mentoring and irrationality: The role of racial taboos. Human Resource
Management, 28, 279-290.
Trossman, S. (2004). Handle with care: The ANA launches a multifaceted campaign to
prevent workplace injuries. American Journal of Nursing, 104, 73-75.
Uchino, B. (2004). Social support and physical health: Understanding the consequences of
relationships. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Uchino, B. , Cacioppo, J. , & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. (1996). The relationship between social
support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms
and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 199, 488-531.
Uvnas-Moberg, K. (1998). Oxytocin may mediate the benefits of positive social interaction
and emotions. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 819-835.
Weber, M. (1991). Max Weber: Essays in sociology. ( H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills , Ed. &
Trans). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1948)
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview
studies. New York: The Free Press.
Weiss, S. J. , & Campos, R. (1999). Touch. In C. A. Lindeman & M. McAthie (Eds.),
Fundamentals of contemporary nursing practice (pp. 941-962). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Williams, C. L. , Giuffre, P. A. , & Dellinger, K. (1999). Sexuality in the workplace:
Organizational control, sexual harassment, and the pursuit of pleasure. Annual Review of
Sociology, 25, 73-93.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. New
York: International University Press.
Wrzesniewski, A. , & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active
crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201.
Wrzesniewski, A. , Dutton, J. E. , & Debebe, G. (2003). Interpersonal sensemaking and
meaning at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 93-135.
Yanow, D. (2006). How built spaces mean: A semiotics of space. In D. Yanow & P. Schwarz-
Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive
turn. Ar-monk, NY: Sharpe.
Zak, P.J. , Kurzban, R. , & Matzner, W.T. (in press). The Neurobiology of Trust. Annals of the
New York Academy of Sciences, 358(1451), 1737-1748.
Energizing Others in Work Connections
Axley, S. R. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit
metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9, 428-437.
Baker, W. , Cross, R. , & Wooten, M. (2003). Positive organizational network analysis and
energizing relationships. In K. S. Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive
organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 328-342). San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler.
Baker, W. , & Quinn, R. W. (2006). Energy networks and information loss. Working paper,
University of Michigan.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change.
Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Barnes, B. (2001). Practice as collective action. In T. R. Schatzki , K. K. Cetina , & E. von
Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 17-28). London: Routledge.
Baumeister, R. F. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal
attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
Berscheid, E. , & Lopes, J. (1997). A temporal model of relationship satisfaction and stability.
In R. J. Sternberg & M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 129-159). New
York: Guilford.
Bos, N. , Olson, J. , Gergle, D. , Olson, G. , & Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer-
mediated communications channels on trust development. In Proceedings of CHI 2002 (pp.
135-140). New York: ACM Press.
Brewer, M. B. , & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-
representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
Collins, R. (1981). On the micro-foundations of macro-sociology. American Journal of
Sociology, 86, 984-1014.
Collins, R. (1993). Emotional energy as the common denominator of rational action.
Rationality and Society, 5, 203-230.
Daft, R. L. , & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness,
and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic.
Dutton, J. E. , & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high quality connections. In K. S.
Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship:
Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 263-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Feldman, M. S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change.
Organization Science, 15, 295-309.
Feldman, M. S. , & Khademian, A. M. (2003). Empowerment and cascading vitality. In K. S.
Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship:
Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 343-358). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Field, T. (1985). Attachment as psychobiological attunement: Being on the same wavelength.
In M. Reite & T. Field (Eds.), The psychobiology of attachment and separation (pp. 415-454).
Orlando, FL: Academic.
Fredrickson, B. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2,
300-319.
Fredrickson, B. L. , & Losada, M. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human
flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678-686.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY:
Doubleday/ Anchor.
Jansen, K. (2004). From persistence to pursuit: A longitudinal examination of momentum
during the early stages of strategic change. Organization Science, 15, 276-294.
Kimberly, R. P. (1970). Rhythmic patterns in human interaction. Nature, 225(5266), 88-90.
Kram, K. E. , & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in
career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110-132.
Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time, and
commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921-936.
Miller, J. B. , & Stiver, I. (1997). The healing connection. Boston: Beacon Press.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated
change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7, 63-92.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed
organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249-273.
Quinn, R. W. , & Dutton, J. E. (2005). Coordination as energy-in-con versation. Academy of
Management Review.
Ryan, R. M. , & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryan, R. M. , & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality
as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529-566.
Saravi, F. D. (1999). Energy and the brain: Facts and fantasies. In S. D. Sala (Ed.), Mind
myths: Exploring popular assumptions about the mind and brain (pp. 43-58). West Sussex,
England: Wiley.
Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Thoits, P. A. (1989). The sociology of emotions. In W. R. Scott & J. Blake (Eds.), Annual
review of sociology (Vol. 15, pp. 317-342). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Warner, C. T. (2001). Bonds that make us free: Healing our relationships, coming to
ourselves. Salt Lake City, UT: Shadow Mountain.
Watson, D. , Clark, L. A. , & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief
measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Watson, D. , & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological
Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
White, R. W. (1963). Ego and reality in psychoanalytic theory. New York: International
Universities Press.
Zajonc, R. B. (1998). Emotions. In D. T. Gilbert , S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The
handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 591-632). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Positive Relationships in Action
Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36,
715-729.
Allen, T. D. (2003). Mentoring others: A dispositional and motivational approach. Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 62, 134-154.
Allen, T. D. & Eby, L. T. (2003). Relationship effectiveness for mentors: Factors associated
with learning and quality. Journal of Management, 29, 469-486.
Allen, T. D. , Eby, L. T. , Poteet, M. L. , Lentz, E. , & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits
associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology,
55,127-136.
Allen, T. D. , Poteet, M. L. , & Burroughs, S. M. (1997). The mentor’s perspective: A
qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 70-89.
Allen, T. D. , Poteet, M. L. , Russell, J. E. A. , & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). A field study of factors
related to supervisors’ willingness to mentor others. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 1-22.
Andersen, P. A. (1993). Cognitive schemata in personal relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.),
Individuals in relationships: Vol. 1. Understanding relationship processes series (pp. 1-29).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Armstrong, S. J. , Allinson, C. W. , & Hayes, J. (2002). Formal mentoring systems: An
examination of the effects of mentor/protégé cognitive styles on the mentoring process.
Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1111-1137.
Aron, A. (2003). Self and close relationships. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.),
Handbook of self and identity (pp. 442-461). New York: Guilford.
Aron, A. , Aron, E. N. , & Norman, C. (2001). Self-expansion model of motivation and
cognition in close relationships and beyond. In M. Clark & G. Fletcher (Eds.), Blackwell
handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Interpersonal processes (pp. 478-501). Oxford,
England: Blackwell.
Aryee, S. , Chay, Y. W. , & Chew, J. (1996). The motivation to mentor among managerial
employees: An interactionist approach. Group and Organization Management, 21, 261-277.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information.
Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484.
Baldwin, M. W. (1997). Relational schemas as a source of if-then self-inference procedures.
Review of General Psychology, 1, 326-335.
Baldwin, M. W. (1999). Relational schemas: Research into social-cognitive aspects of
interpersonal experience. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality:
Social cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organizations (pp. 127-154). New York:
Guilford.
Baldwin, M. W. , & Fergusson, P. (2001). Relational schemas: The activation of interpersonal
knowledge structures in social anxiety. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International
handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research and interventions relating to the self and
shyness (pp. 235-257). New York: Wiley.
Bartholomew, K. , & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of
a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79-129.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Bozionelos, N. (2004). Mentoring provided: Relation to mentor’s career success, personality,
and mentoring received. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 24-46.
Brewer, M. B. , & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self
representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
Brickson, S. , & Brewer, M. (2001). Identity orientation and intergroup relations in
organizations. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational
contexts (pp. 49-66). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Cameron, K. S. , Dutton, J. E. , & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Foundations of positive organizational
scholarship. In K. S. Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn , (Eds.), Positive organizational
scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 3-13). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Chao, G. T. (1997). Mentoring phases and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 15-
28.
Chao, G. T. , Walz, P. M. , & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A
comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel
Psychology, 45, 619-636.
Clark, M. , & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal
relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
Clark, M. , & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships.
Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 19, 684-691.
Clutterbuck, D. , & Ragins, B. R. (2002). Mentoring and diversity: An international
perspective. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s.
Cross, S. E. , Bacon, P. L. , & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-
construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
Cross, S. E. , & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender.
Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
deJanasz, S. C. , Sullivan, S. E. , & Whiting, V. (2003). Mentor networks and career success:
Lessons for turbulent times. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 78-93.
Duck, S. (1990). Relationships as unfinished business: Out of the frying pan and into the
1990’s. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 5-28.
Duck, S. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Dutton, J. E. , & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. In K. S.
Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship:
Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 263-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Eby, L. T. (1997). Alternative forms of mentoring in changing organizational environments: A
conceptual extension of the mentoring literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 125-
144.
Eby, L. T. , & Allen, T. D. (2002). Further investigation of protégés’ negative mentoring
experiences: Patterns and outcomes. Group and Organization Management, 27, 456-479.
Eby, L. T. , Butts, M. , Lockwood, A. , & Simon, S. A. (2004). protégés’ negative mentoring
experiences: Construct development and nomological validation. Personnel Psychology, 57,
411-447.
Eby, L. T. , McManus, S. E. , Simon, S. A. , & Russell, J. E. A. (2000). The protégé’s
perspective regarding negative mentoring experiences: The development of a taxonomy.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 1-21.
Ensher, E. , Heun, C. , & Blanchard, A. (2003). On-line mentoring and computer mediated
communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 264-288.
Ferraro, F. , Pfeffer, J. , & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How
theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30, 8-24.
Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of
social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
Fiske, A. P. (2004). Relational models theory 2.0. In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational models
theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 3-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
Fletcher, J. K. (1996). A relational approach to developing the protean worker. In D. T. Hall &
Associates (Eds.), The career is dead—Long live the career (pp. 105-131). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Fletcher, J. K. (1998). Relational practice: A feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 7, 163-186.
Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Godshalk, V. M. , & Sosik, J. J. (2000). Does mentor-protégé agreement on mentor
leadership behavior influence the quality of a mentoring relationship? Group and
Organization Management, 25, 291-317.
Godshalk, V. M. , & Sosik, J. J. (2003). Aiming for career success: The role of learning goal
orientation in mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 417-437.
Hamilton, B. A. , & Scandura, T. A. (2003). E-mentoring: Implications for organizational
learning and development in a wired world. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 388-403.
Haslam, N. N. (Ed.). (2004). Relational models theory: A contemporary overview. Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hassebrauck, M. (1997). Cognitions of relationship quality: A prototype analysis of their
structure and consequences. Personal Relationships, 4, 163-185.
Hassebrauck, M. , & Aron, A. (2001). Prototype matching in close relationships. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1111-1122.
Higgins, M. C. , & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A
developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 264-288.
Higgins, M. C. , & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Constellations and careers: Toward understanding
the effects of multiple developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22,
223-247.
Horowitz, M. J. (1989). Relationship schema formulation: Role-relationship models and
intrapsychic conflict. Psychiatry, 52, 260-274.
Hunt, D. M. , & Michael, C. (1983). Mentorship: A career training and development tool.
Academy of Management Review, 8, 475-485.
Jensen, M. C. , & Meckling, W. H. (1994, Summer). The nature of man. Journal of Applied
Corporate Finance, 4-19.
Kahn, W. A. (1998). Relational systems at work. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.),
Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 39-76). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Katz, D. , & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York:
Wiley.
Kolb, D. M. (1992). Women’s work: Peacemaking in organizations. In D. M. Kolb & J.
Bartunek (Eds.), Hidden conflict in organizations: Uncovering behind the scenes disputes
(pp. 63-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kram, K. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life.
Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Kram, K. (1996). A relational approach to career development. In D. T. Hall (Ed.), The career
is dead—Long live the career: A relational approach to careers (pp. 132-157). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lankau, M. J. , & Scandura, T. A. (2002). An investigation of personal learning in mentoring
relationships: Content, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Journal,
45, 779-790.
Luthans, F. , & Avolio, B. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In K. S. Cameron , J. E.
Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new
discipline (pp. 241-258). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Luthans, F. , & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital
management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33,
143-160.
Markus, H. R. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition,
emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Markus, H. , & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858-866.
Markus, H. , & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G.
Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 137-230).
New York: Random House.
McManus, S. E. , & Russell, J. E. A. (1997). New directions for mentoring research: An
examination of related constructs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 145-161.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.
Miller, J. B. , & Stiver, I. (1997). The healing connection. Boston: Beacon Press.
Mills, J. , Clark, M. S. , Ford, T. E. , & Johnson, M. (2004). Measurement of communal
strength. Personal Relationships, 11, 213-230.
Mullen, E. J. (1994). Framing the mentoring relationship as an information exchange. Human
Resource Management Review, 4, 257-281.
Mullen, E. J. , & Noe, R. A. (1999). The mentoring information exchange: When do mentors
seek information from their protégés? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 233-242.
Murray, M. (2001). Beyond the myths and magic of mentoring: How to facilitate an effective
mentoring process. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Noe, R. A. , Greenberger, D. B. , & Wang, S. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where
we might go. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 21, 129-173.
Ogilvie, D. M. , & Ashmore, R. D. (1991). Self-with-other representation as a unit of analysis
in self-concept research. In R. C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences
in psychoanalysis and social psychology (pp. 282-314). New York: Guildford.
Ogilvie, D. M. , Fleming, C. J. , & Pennell, G. E. (1998) . Self-with-other representations. In D.
F. Barone , M. Hersen , & V. B. van Hasselt (Eds.), Advanced personality (pp. 353-375). New
York: Plenum.
Pietromonaco, P. R. , & Barrett, L. F. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do
we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology, 4, 155-
175.
Planalp, S. (1985). Relational schemata: A test of alternative forms of relational knowledge
as guides to communication. Human Communication Research, 12, 3-29.
Planalp, S. (1987). Interplay between relational knowledge and events. In R. Burnett , P.
McGhee , & D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation, &
knowledge (pp. 175-191). New York: Methuen.
Ragins, B. R. (1989). Barriers to mentoring: The female manager’s dilemma. Human
Relations, 42, 1-22.
Ragins, B. R. (1997). Diversified mentoring relationships in organizations: A power
perspective. Academy of Management Review, 22, 482-521.
Ragins, B. R. (1999). Gender and mentoring relationships: A review and research agenda for
the next decade. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 347-370).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ragins, B. R. (2005). Towards a theory of relational mentoring. Unpublished manuscript,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee.
Ragins, B. R. , & Cotton, J. L. (1993). Gender and willingness to mentor in organizations.
Journal of Management, 19, 97-111.
Ragins, B. R. , & Cotton, J. L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men
and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology,
84, 529-550.
Ragins, B. R. , Cotton, J. L. , & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of
mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy
of Management Journal, 43, 1177-1194.
Ragins, B. R. , & McFarlin, D. B. (1990). Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender
mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 321-339.
Ragins, B. R. , & Scandura, T. A. (1994). Gender differences in expected outcomes of
mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 957-971.
Ragins, B. R. , & Scandura, T. A. (1997). The way we were: Gender and the termination of
mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 945-953.
Ragins, B. R. , & Scandura, T. A. (1999). Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of
being a mentor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 493-509.
Reis, H. T. , & Gable, S. L. (2003). Toward a positive psychology of relationships. In C. L. M.
Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 129-159).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Roberts, L. M. , Dutton, J. E. , Sprietzer, G. M. , Heaphy, E. D. , & Quinn, R. E. (2005).
Composing the reflected best self-portrait: Building pathways for becoming extraordinary in
work organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 712-736.
Rose, G. L. (2003). Enhancement of mentor selection using the ideal mentor scale.
Research in Higher Education, 44, 473-494.
Rose, G. L. (2005). Group differences in graduate students’ concepts of the ideal mentor.
Research in Higher Education, 46, 53-81.
Safran, J. D. (1990). Towards a refinement of cognitive therapy in light of interpersonal
theory: I. Theory. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 87-105.
Safran, J. D. , & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. New York:
Basic Books.
Sanchez-Burks, J. , Nisbett, R. E. , & Ybarra, O. (2000). Cultural styles, relational schemas,
and prejudice against out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 174-
189.
Scandura, T. A. (1998). Dysfunctional mentoring relationships and outcomes. Journal of
Management, 24, 449-467.
Schank, R. C. , & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry
into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schneider, D. J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 294-
309.
Sosik, J. J. , & Godshalk, V. M. (2000). Leadership styles, mentoring functions received, and
job-related stress: A conceptual model and preliminary study. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 21, 365-390.
Sosik, J. J. , & Godshalk, V. M. (2004). Self-other rating agreement in mentoring: Meeting
protégé expectations for development and career advancement. Group and Organization
Management, 29, 442-469.
Sosik, J. J. , Godshalk, V. M. , & Yammarino, F. J. (2004). Transformational leadership,
learning goal orientation, and expectations for career success in mentor-protégé
relationships: A multiple levels of analysis perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 241-
261.
Stryker, S. , & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: Theory
and research example. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social
behavior (pp. 199-218). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Stryker, S. , & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role therapy. In G. Lindzey & E.
Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 311-378) New York: Random
House.
Surrey, J. (1985). The self in relation. Working paper #13 Centers for Women, Wellesley
College, Wellesley, MA. http://www.wcwonline.org
Tomkins, S. S. (1987). Script theory. In J. Aronoff , A. I. Rabin , & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), The
emergence of personality (pp. 147-216). New York: Springer.
van Emmerik, I. J. H. (2004). The more you can get the better: Mentoring constellations and
intrinsic career success. Career Development International, 9, 578-594.
Wanberg, C. R. , Welsh, E. T. , & Hezlett, S. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and
dynamic process model. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22,
39-124.
Waters, L. (2004). Protégé-mentor agreement about the provision of psychosocial support:
The mentoring relationship, personality, and workload. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65,
519-532.
Young, A. M. , & Perrewé, P. L. (2000a). The exchange relationship between mentors and
protégés: The development of a framework. Human Resources Management Review, 10,
177-209.
Young, A. M. , & Perrewé, P. L. (2000b). What did you expect? An examination of career-
related support among mentors and protégés. Journal of Management, 26, 611-632.
Young, A. M. , & Perrewé, P. L. (2004). The role of expectations in the mentoring exchange:
An analysis of mentor and protégé expectations in relation to perceived support. Journal of
Managerial Issues, 16, 103-126.
Rebuilding Trust and Restoring Positive Relationships
Baumeister, R. F. , Bratslavsky, E. , Finkenauer, C. , & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger
than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
Becker, H. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66,
32-40.
Bies, R. J. , & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: Getting even and the need for revenge. In
R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research
(pp. 246-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bottom, W. P. , Gibson, K. , Daniels, S. , & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap:
Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization
Science, 13, 497-513.
Brickman, P. , et al. (1987). Commitment, conflict, and caring. In C. B. Wortman & R.
Sorrentino (Eds.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Clark, M. S. , & Mills, J. R. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal
relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
Collins, J. C. (2006). ThinkExist.com Quotations Online, June 1, 2006, and July 19, 2006.
Available online @ http://einstein/quotes/johnchurchton
Dirks, K. T. , & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization
Science, 12, 450-467.
Driver, J. , Tabares, A. , Shapiro, A. , Nahm, E. Y. , & Gottman, J. (2003). Interactional
patterns in marital success or failure: Gottman laboratory studies. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal
family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (pp. 493-513). New York: Guilford.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.
Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of
social relations. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 689-723.
Frederickson, B. , & Losada, M. (2004). The complex dynamics of human flourishing: Toward
a general theory of positivity (Working paper). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce: The relationship between marital processes
and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kiesler, C. (1971). The psychology of commitment. New York: Academic.
Kim, P. H. , Dirks, K. T. , Cooper, C. D. , & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better
than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a
competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 99, 49-65.
Kim, P. , Ferrin, D. L. , Cooper, C. , & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion:
The effects of apology vs. denial for repairing competence- vs. integrity-based trust
violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 104-118.
Konovsky, M. , & Pugh, D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of
Management Journal, 37, 656-669.
Lewicki, R. J. , & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work
relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory
and research (pp. 114-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lewicki, R. J. , McAllister, D. J. , & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships
and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438-458.
Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing
psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 57-72.
Maclnnis, D. , & de Mello, G. (2005). The concept of hope and its relevance to product
evaluation and choice. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1-14.
Mayer, R. C. , Davis, J. H. , & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of
organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal
cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
Meyer, J. P. , & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and
application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
North, J. (1987). Wrongdoing and forgiveness. Philosophy, 62, 499-508.
Pratt, M. G. , & Doucet, L. (2000). Ambivalent feelings in organizational relationships. In S.
Fineman (Ed.), Emotions in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 204-226). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pratt, M. G. , & Rosa, J. A. (2003). Transforming work-family conflict into commitment in
network marketing organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 395-418.
Reeder, G. D. , & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in
interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
Reeder, G. D. , & Coovert, M. (1986). Revising an impression of morality. Social Cognition, 4,
1-17
Rousseau, D. M. , Sitkin, S. B. , Burt, R. S. , & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all:
A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine & Atherton.
Salancik, G. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B.
M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 1-54).
Chicago: St. Clair.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression
formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
Tomlinson, E. C. , Dineen, B. R. , & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation:
Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of
Management, 30, 165-187.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Whitener, E. , Brodt, S. , Korsgaard, M. A. , & Werner, J. (1998). Managers as initiators of
trust: An exchange relationship for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy
of Management Journal, 23, 513-553.
Wilson, J. (1988). Why forgiveness requires repentance. Philosophy, 63, 534-535.
The Engines of Positive Relationships Across Difference
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic.
Adler, N. J. , & Bartholomew, S. (1992). Managing globally competent people. Academy of
Management Executive, 6(3), 52-65.
Alderfer, C. P. (1977). Group and intergroup relations. In J. R. Hackman & J. L. Shuttle
(Eds.), Improving life at work: Behavioral sciences approaches to organizational change: (pp.
227-296). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ancona, D. G. , & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and
performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective.
Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465-487.
Ashforth, B. E. , & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of
Management Review, 14, 20-39.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Baron, R. M. , & Ganz, R. L. (1972). Effects of locus of control and type of feedback on the
task performance of lower-class Black children. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 21, 124-130.
Blake, R. R. , & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
Boulding, E. (1961). Conflict management in organizations. Ann Arbor, MI: Foundation for
Research on Human Behavior.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social
Cognition, 11, 150-164.
Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love
become outgroup hate? In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup
conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 17-41). London: Oxford University Press.
Brewer, M. B. , & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske
(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol 2, pp. 554-594). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brockner, J. (1979). The effects of self-esteem, success-failure, and self-consciousness on
task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1732-1741.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.
Carver, C. S. , Glass, D. C. , & Katz, I. (1978). Favorable evaluations of Blacks and the
handicapped: Positive prejudice, unconscious denial, or social desirability? Journal of
Applied Social Psychology, 8, 97-106.
Chan, D. K. S. , & Goto, S. G. (2003). Conflict resolution in the culturally diverse workplace:
Some data from Hong Kong employees. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52,
441-460.
Cole, M. S. , Schaninger, W. S. , & Harris, S. G. (2002). The workplace social exchange
network: A multilevel, conceptual examination. Group and Organization Management, 27,
142-167.
Cooper, J. , & Stone, J. (2000). Cognitive dissonance and the social group. In D. J. Terry &
M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group
membership (pp. 227-244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Crosby, F. , Bromley, S. , & Saxe, L. (1980). Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White
discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 546-563.
Davidson, M. N. (2001). Know thine adversary: The impact of race on styles of dealing with
conflict. Sex Roles, 45, 259-276.
Davidson, M. N. , & Greenhalgh, L. (1999). The role of emotion in negotiation: The impact of
anger and race. In R. J. Bies , R. L. Lewicki , & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research in
negotiation in organizations (Vol. 7, pp. 3-26). Stamford, CT: JAI.
De Dreu, C. K. W. & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team
performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 88, 741-749.
De Dreu, C. K. W. , Weingart, L. R. , & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on
integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 78, 889-905.
DeLongis, A. , Folkman, S. , & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). The impact of daily stress on health
and mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 54, 486-495.
Dindia, K. (2000). Self-disclosure, identity, and relationship development: A dialectical
perspective. In K. Dindia & S. Duck (Eds.), Communication and personal relationships (pp.
147-162). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Dovidio, J. F. , Gaertner, S. L. , & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past,
present, and the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 5-20.
Dutton, J. , & Heaphy, E. (2003). The power of high quality connections. In K. Cameron , J.
Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 263-278). San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler.
Ely, R. J. , & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity
perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46,
229-273.
Ely, R. J. , & Thomas, D. A. (2005). Team learning and the link between racial diversity and
performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Ensher, E. A. , & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and
contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 460-481.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fredrickson, B. L. , & Branigan, C. (2001). Positive emotions. In T. J. Mayne & G. A.
Bonanno (Eds.), Emotions: Currrent issues and future directions (pp. 123-151). New York:
Guilford.
Friedman, R. , & Davidson, M. N. (1999). The Black-White gap in perceptions of
discrimination: Its causes and consequences. In R. J. Bies , R. L. Lewicki , & B. H. Sheppard
(Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 7, pp. 203-228). Stamford, CT: JAI.
Friedman, R. A. , & Davidson, M. N. (2001). Managing diversity and second-order conflict.
International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 132-153.
Gaertner, S. L. , Dovidio, J. F. , Rust, M. C. , Nier, J. A. , Banker, B. S. , Ward, C. M. , et al.
(1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 76, 388-402.
Garcia-Prieto, P. , Bellard, E. , Schneider, S. C. , & Garcia-Prieto, P. P. G. (2003).
Experiencing diversity, conflict, and emotions in teams. Applied Psychology: An International
Review, 52, 413-440.
Geddes, D. , & Konrad, A. M. (2003). Demographic differences and reactions to performance
feed-back. Human Relations, 56, 1485-1513.
Gersick, C. J. G. , Bartunek, J. M. , & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Learning from academia: The
importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1026-
1044.
Girodo, M. (1977). Self-talk: Mechanisms in anxiety and stress management. In C. D.
Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (pp. 229-250). New York:
Hemisphere.
Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions
in Psychological Science, 10, 214-219.
Hill, M. (1997). Whiteness: A critical reader. New York: New York University Press.
Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self
and identity (pp. 462-479). New York: Guilford.
Hogg, M. A. , & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in
organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and
access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
James, E. H. (2000). Race-related differences in promotions and support: Underlying effects
of human and social capital. Organization Science, 11, 493-508.
James, E. H. , Brief, A. P. , Dietz, J. , & Cohen, R. R. (2001). Prejudice matters:
Understanding the reactions of Whites to affirmative action programs targeted to benefit
Blacks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1120-1128.
Jeanquart-Barone, S. (1993). Trust differences between supervisors and subordinates:
Examining the role of race and gender. Sex Roles, 29, 1-11.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup
conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational
groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557.
Jehn, K. A. , & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of
intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
Jehn, K. A. , Northcraft, G. B. , & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A
field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
Joplin, J. R. W. , & Daus, C. S. (1997). Challenges of leading a diverse workforce. Academy
of Management Executive, 77(3), 32-47.
Kilmann, R. H. , & Thomas, K. W. (1978). Four perspectives on conflict management: An
attributional framework for organizing descriptive and normative theory. Academy of
Management Review, 3, 58-68.
Kirmeyer, S. L. , & Lin, T. R. (1987). Social support: Its relationship to observed
communication with peers and superiors. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 138-151.
Krackhardt, D. , & Kilduff, M. (1990). Friendship patterns and culture: The control of
organizational diversity. American Anthropologist, 92, 142-154.
Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life.
Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lazarus, R. S. (1995). Vexing research problems inherent in cognitive-mediational theories
of emotion—and some solutions. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 183-196.
Lefrancois, G. R. (1987). The lifespan (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson
Learning.
Lubensky, M. E. , Holland, S. L. , Wiethoff, C. , & Crosby, F. J. (2004). Diversity and sexual
orientation: Including and valuing sexual minorities in the workplace. In M. S. Stockdale & F.
J. Crosby (Eds.), The psychology and management of workplace diversity (pp. 206-223).
Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
Maass, A. , Milesi, A. , Zabbini, S. , & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias:
Differential expectancies or in-group protection? Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 68, 116-126.
Merriam, S. (1983). Mentors and proteges: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education
Quarterly, 33, 161-173.
Morrison, E. W. , & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and
development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25, 706-725.
Myrdal, G. , Sterner, R. M. E. , & Rose, A. M. (1944). An American dilemma: The Negro
problem and modern democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Pelled, L. H. , Eisenhardt, K. M. , & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of
work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process.
Psychological Science, 8, 162-166.
Polzer, J. T. , Milton, L. P. , & Swann, W. B., Jr . (2002). Capitalizing on diversity:
Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-
324.
Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 12, 295-320.
Pondy, L. R. (1969). Varieties of organizational conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14,
499-506.
Pruitt, D. G. , & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement.
New York: Random House.
Putnam, L. L. , & Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. In F. M. Jablin , L. L. Putnam ,
K. H. Roberts , & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An
interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 549-599). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ragins, B. R. (1997). Diversified mentoring relationships in organizations: A power
perspective. Academy of Management Review, 22, 482-521.
Ramsey, V. J. , & Latting, J. K. (2005). A typology of intergroup competencies. Journal of
Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 265-284.
Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments,
contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources
Management, 19, 131-173.
Roccas, S. , & Brewer, M. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 6, 88-106.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of
reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
Rotter, J. B. (1982). Social learning theory. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectation and actions:
Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 241-260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Rubin, J. Z. (1994). Models of conflict management. Special issue: Constructive conflict
management: An answer to critical social problems? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 33-45.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.
New York: Doubleday.
Sidanius, J. , & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy
and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sniderman, P. M. , & Tetlock, P. E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution
in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129-150.
Swim, J. K. , & Miller, D. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for
attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500-514.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of
intergroup relations. New York: Academic.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology,
33, 1-39.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S.
Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24).
Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Thomas, D. A. , & Gabarro, J. J. (1999). Breaking through: The making of minority executives
in corporate America. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Thomas, K. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 13, 263-274.
Totterdell, P. , Spelten, E. , Smith, L. , & Barton, J. (1995). Recovery from work shifts: How
long does it take? Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 43-57.
Tsui, A. S. , & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of
relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32,
402-423.
Tung, R. L. (1993). Managing cross-national and intra-national diversity. Human Resource
Management, 32, 461-477.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A. , Oakes, P. J. , Reicher, S. D. , & Wetherell, M. S. (1987).
Rediscovering the social group: A self<ategorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Weinberger, D. A. (1995). The construct validity of the repressive coping style. In J. L. Singer
(Ed.), Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality theory, psychopathology, and
health (pp. 337-386). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wong, R. R. (1995). Divorce mediation among Asian Americans: Bargaining in the shadow of
diversity. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 33, 110-128.
Positive Organizational Justice
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
Adams, S. (1953). Status congruency as a variable in small group performance. Social
Forces, 32, 16-22.
Baumeister, R. F. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal
attachments as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (injustice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R.
Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 85-108), Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press.
Buchanan, A. , & Mathieu, D. (1986). Philosophy and justice. In R. L. Cohen (Ed.), Justice:
Views from the social sciences (pp. 11-46). New York: Plenum.
Cameron, K. S. , & Caza, A. (2004). Contributions to positive organizational scholarship.
American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 731-739.
Cameron, K. S. , Dutton, J. E. , & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Foundations of positive organizational
scholarship. In K. S. Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational
scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 3-23). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Colquitt, J. A. , & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state
of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd
ed., pp. 165-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colquitt, J. A. , Greenberg, J. , & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice?
An historical overview of the field. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of
organizational justice (pp. 3-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colquitt, J. A. , Zapata-Phelan, C. P. , & Roberson, Q. M. (2005). Justice in teams: A review
of fairness effects in collective contexts. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and
human resources management (Vol. 24, pp. 53-94). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Dickson, M. W. , & Smith, D. B. (2001). An organizational climate regarding ethics: The
outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 197-
217.
Elovainio, M. , Kivimäki, M. , & Helkama, K. (2001). Organizational justice evaluations, job
control, and occupational strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 418-424.
Erhart, M. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level
organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61-95.
Finkel, N. J. (2000). But it’s not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness. Psychology, Public
Policy, and Law, 6, 898-952.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-
and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 219-226.
Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations.
In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 389-435).
New York: Academic.
Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of
Management Review, 12, 9-22.
Greenberg, J. (1990a). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden
cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
Greenberg, J. (1990b). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational
justice. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12,
pp. 111-157). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of
organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching
fairness in human resources management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair procedures to promote acceptance of a work site
smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288-297.
Greenberg, J. (1996). The quest for justice the job: Essays and experiments. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Greenberg, J. (2000). Promote procedural justice to enhance acceptance of work outcomes.
In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 181-195).
Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
Greenberg, J. (2003). Creating unfairness by mandating fair procedures: The hidden hazards
of a pay-for-performance plan. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 41-57.
Greenberg, J. (2006). Losing sleep over organizational injustice: Attenuating insomniac
reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 91, 9-20.
Greenberg, J. , Bies, R. J. , & Eskew, D. E. (1991). Establishing fairness in the eye of the
beholder: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In R. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld
(Eds.), Applied impression management: How image making affects managerial decisions
(pp. 111-132). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Greenberg, J. , & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Greenberg, J. , Eskew, D. E. , & Miles, J. (1991, August). Adherence to participatory norms
as a moderator of the fair process effect: When voice does not enhance procedural justice.
Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami Beach, FL.
Greenberg, J. , & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process
effect in groups and organizations. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 235-
256). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Greenberg, J. , Roberge, M. E. , Ho, V. T. , & Rousseau, D. (2004). Fairness as an “i-deal”:
Justice in under-the-table employment arrangements. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in
personnel and human resources management (Vol. 23, pp. 1-34). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Greenberg, J. , & Wiethoff, C. (2001). Organizational justice as proaction and reaction:
Implications for research and application. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace:
Vol. 2. From theory to practice (pp. 271-301). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
Ito, T. A. , Larsen, J. T. , Smith, N. K. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs
more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). Form acts to dispositions: The attribution process in
person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2,
pp. 219-266). New York: Academic.
Kelley, H. H. (1972). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
Keyes, C. L. M. , & Haidt, J. (2003). Introduction: Human flourishing-The study of that which
makes life worthwhile. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Hadit (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology
and the life well-lived (pp. 3-22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lamertz, K. (2002). Social construction of fairness: Social influence and sense making in
organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 19-37.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the
study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen , M. Greenberg , & R. Willis (Eds.),
Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
Lewicki, R. J. , Wiethoff, C. , & Tomlinson, E. C. (2005). What is the role of trust in
organizational justice? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational
justice (pp. 247-272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liao, H. , & Rupp, D. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate, climate strength, and justice
orientation on work outcomes: A multilevel-multifoci framework. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 90, 242-256.
Lind, E. A. , Greenberg, J. , Scott, K. S. , & Welchans, T. D. (2000). The winding road from
employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination
claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557-590.
Lind, E. A. , & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York:
Plenum.
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 23, 695-706.
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Martin, J. (2001). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McFarlin, D. B. , & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of
satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal,
35, 626-637.
Naumann, S. E. , & Bennett, N. (2002). The effects of procedural justice climate on work
group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 361-377.
Nelson, D. L. , & Simmons, B. L. (2004). Eustress: An elusive construct, an engaging pursuit.
In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being (Vol.
3, pp. 265-322). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Neuhauser, P. C. (1993). Corporate legends and lore: The power of storytelling as a
management tool. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ott, J. S. (1989). The organizational culture perspective. Chicago: Dorsey.
Pearson, C. M. , & Porath C. L. (2003). On incivility, its impact and directions for future
research. In R. Griffin & A. O’Leary-Kelly (Eds.), The dark side of organizations (pp. 403-
425). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peterson, R. S. (1999). Can you have too much of a good thing? The limits of voice for
improving satisfaction with leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 315-324.
Quick, J. C. , Mack, D. , Gavin, J. J. , Cooper, C. L. , & Quick, J. D. (2004). Organizational
Stress. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well
being (Vol. 3, pp. 359-405). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Robbins, L. (2004, November 22). One player barred for season as N.B.A. responds to
brawl. New York Times, pp. Cl, C3.
Schein, E. H. (1999). The corporate culture survival guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schwepker, C. H., Jr . (2001). Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational
commitment, and turnover intentions in the salesforce. Journal of Business Research, 54,
39-52.
Seligman, M. , & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist,
55, 5-14.
Shapiro, D. L. , Buttner, E. H. , & Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their
perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 346-368.
Simons, T. , & Roberson, Q. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects
of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology,
88, 432-443.
Skarlicki, D. P. , & Folger, P. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive,
procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
Skarlicki, D. P. , & Latham, G. P. (2005). How can training be used to foster organizational
justice. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 499-
522). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spreitzer, G. M. , & Mishra, A. K. (2002). To stay or to go: Voluntary survivor turnover
following an organizational downsizing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 707-729.
Theorell, T. (2004). Democracy at work and its relationship to health. In P. L. Perrewe & D.
C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being (Vol. 3, pp. 323-357). San
Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Thibaut, J. , & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tyler, T. R. , & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna
(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA:
Academic.
van Prooijen, J.-W. , van den Bos, K. , & Wilke, H. A. M. (2004). Group belongingness and
procedural justice: Social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 66-79.
Vermunt, R. , & Steensma, H. (2005). How can justice be used to manage stress in
organizations? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice
(pp. 343-367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vincent, P. F. (2004). Restoring school civility. Chapel Hill, NC: Character Development
Group.
Weaver, G. R. , & Conlon, D. E. (2003). Explaining façades of choice: Timing, justice effects
and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2217-2243.
Wenzel, M. (2002). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax
compliance: The role of taxpayers’ identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 629-645.
Wright, T. A. (2003). Positive organizational behavior: An idea whose time has truly come.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 437-442.
Wright, T. A. , & Cropanzano, R. S. (2000). The role of organizational behavior in
occupational health psychology: A view as we approach the millennium. Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 5-10.
Wright, T. A. , & Wright, V. P. (2002). Organizational researcher values, ethical responsibility,
and the committed-to-participant research perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11,
173-185.
Commentary
Baxter, L. A. , & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogs and dialectics. New York:
Guilford.
Carl, W. J. , & Duck, S. W. (2004). How to do things with relationships. In P. Kalbfleisch
(Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 28, pp. 1-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Delia, J. G. (1980). Some tentative thoughts concerning the study of interpersonal
relationships and their development. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44, 97-
103.
Duck, S. W. (1990). Relationships as unfinished business: Out of the frying pan and into the
1990s. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 5-29.
Duck, S. W. , Foley, M. K. , & Kirkpatrick, C. D. (2006). Relating difficulty in a triangular
world. In C. D. Kirkpatrick , S. W. Duck , & M. K. Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The
processes of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 225-232). Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Duck, S. W. , Foley, M. K. , & Kirkpatrick, C. D. (in press). Uncovering the complex roles
behind the “difficult” co-worker. In J. F. Harden & B. Omdahl (Eds.), Working with difficult
people. New York: Peter Lang.
Hecht, M. , & Warren, J. R. (2006). Helpful professional relating: constructing the mentoring
relationship through everyday talk. In J. T. Wood & S. W. Duck (Eds.), Composing
relationships: Communication in everyday life (pp. 156-165). Belmont, CA: Thomson
Wadsworth.
Katriel, T. (1986). Talking straight: “Dugri” speech in Israeli sabra culture. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
La Gaipa, J. J. (1977). Interpersonal attraction and social exchange. In S. W. Duck (Ed.),
Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 129-164). London: Academic.
La Gaipa, J. J. (1982). Rules and rituals in disengaging from relationships. In S. W. Duck
(Ed.), Personal relationships 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 189-209). London:
Academic.
Montgomery, B. M. (1988). Quality communication in personal relationships. In S. W. Duck
(Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 343-362). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Prager, K. J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. New York: Guilford.
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.
Wood, J. T. , & Duck, S. W. (Eds.). (2006). Composing relationships: Communication in
everyday life. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Meaningful Connections
Albert, S. , & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Shaw
(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 263-295).
Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational
settings. New York: The Free Press.
Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the
organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252-
276.
Alper, S. , Tjosvold, D. , & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group
decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 74, 33-52.
Ancona, D. , & Caldwell, D. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity in performance in
organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
Baldwin, T. T. , Bedell, M. D. , & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based
MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of
Management Journal, 6, 1369-1397.
Bass, B. M. (1981). Stodgill’s handbook of leadership (2nd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an
organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539.
Brass, D. J. , & Burkhardt, M. E. (1992). Centrality and power in organizations. In N. Nohria &
R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 191-215).
Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Brass, D. J. , & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of
structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 441-470.
Brass, D. J. , Butterfield, K. D. , & Skaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical
behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23, 14-31.
Burkhardt, M. E. (1994). Social interaction effects following a technological change: A
longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 869-898.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Cohen, A. (1995). An examination of the relationships between work commitment and
nonwork domains. Human Relations, 48, 239-263.
Cohen, S. , & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.
Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
Cordes, C. , & Doughtery, T. W. (1993). A review and an integration of research on job
burnout. Academy of Management Review, 18, 621-657.
Ely, R. J. , & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The moderating effects of work
group perspectives on diversity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229-273.
Evered, R. , & Selman, J. (1990). Coaching and the art of management. Organizational
Dynamics, 18(2), 16-32.
Frost, P. (2002). Toxic emotions at work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Gersick , C, Bartunek, J. , & Dutton, J. (2000). Learning from academe: The importance of
relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1026-1045.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-
1380.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of
organizational behavior (pp. 190-222). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hall, D. T. (1996). The career is dead. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hall, D. T. , & Kahn, W. A. (2002) Developmental relationships at work: A learning
perspective. In C. Cooper (Ed.), The world of work (pp. 49-74). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Heaney, C. A. , House, J. S. , Israel, B. A. , & Mero, R. P. (1995). The relationship of
organizational and social coping resources to employee coping behavior: A longitudinal
analysis. Work and Stress, 9, 416-431.
Horn, P. W. , & Griffeth, R. W. (1995). Employee turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South/Western.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and
access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual
framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56-87.
Josselson, R. (1996). The space between us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45,
321-349.
Kahn, W. A. (1993). Caring for the caregivers: Patterns of organizational caregiving.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 539-563.
Kahn, W. A. (1998) Relational systems at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 39-
76.
Kahn, W. A. (2001) Holding environments at work. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
37, 260-279.
Kahn, W. A. (2005). Holding fast: The struggle to create resilient caregiving organizations.
London: Brunner-Routledge.
Kanov, J. , Maitlis, S. , Worline, M. , Dutton, J. , Frost, P. , & Lilius, J. (2004). Compassion in
organizational life. American Behavioral Science, 47, 808-827.
Kilduff, M. , & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of
the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 87-
108.
Konovsky, M. A. , & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy
of Management Journal, 37, 656-669.
Krackhardt, D. , & Porter, L. W. (1986). The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in
communication networks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 50-55.
Kram, K. E. (1985) Mentoring at work. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Lawler, E. J. , & Yoon, J. (1998) Network structure and emotion in exchange relationships.
American Sociological Review, 63, 871-894.
Lincoln, J. R. , & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative
analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181-199.
Locke, E. A. (2000). Motivation, cognition and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and
knowledge. Applied Psychology, 49, 408-430.
Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sensemaking: What newcomers experience when entering
unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
Miller, J. B. (1987). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
Mitchell, T. R. , Holtom, B. C. , Lee, T. W. , Sablynski, C. J. , & Erez, M. (2001). Why people
stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management
Journal, 44, 1102-1121.
Mitroff, I. (1993). Crisis leadership. New York: Wiley.
Podolny, J. , & Barron, J. (1997). Relationships and resources: Social networks and mobility
in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693.
Ragins, B. R. (1994). Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships.
Academy of Management Journal, 37, 957-971.
Rogers, C. R. (1958). The characteristics of a helping relationship. Personnel and Guidance
Journal, 37, 6-16.
Smith, K. K. , & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network
approach. Theory and Society, 23, 605-949.
Sparrowe, R. T. , & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange.
Academy of Management Review, 22, 522-552.
Stevenson, W. B. , & Gilly, M. (1993). Problem-solving networks in organizations: Intentional
design and emergent structure. Social Networks, 22, 92-113.
Stevenson, W. B. , & Greenberg, D. (2000). Agency and social networks: Strategies of action
in a social structure of position, opposition and opportunity. Administrative Science Quarterly,
45, 651-678.
Thomas, D. A. (1993). The dynamics of managing racial diversity in developmental
relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 169-194.
Tsai, W. , & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm
networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476.
Van Maanen, J. , & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In
B. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209-264). Greenwich, CT:
JAI.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
A Contingency Perspective on Developmental Networks
Berscheid, E. , & Lopes, J. (1997). A temporal model of relationship satisfaction and stability.
In R. J. Sternberg & M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfactions in close relationships (pp. 129-159). New
York: Guilford.
Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management.
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-79.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Chao, G. T. , Walz, P. M. , & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A
comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel
Psychology, 45, 619-636.
Cohen, S. (2001). Social relationships and the susceptibility to the common cold. In C. Ryff &
B. Singer (Eds.), Emotion, social relationships, and health (pp. 221-232). Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
Cummings, J. , & Higgins, M. C. (2005). Relational instability at the core: Support dynamics
in developmental networks. Social Networks, 25(1), 38-55.
de Janasz, S. C. , Sullivan, S. E. , & Whiting, V. R. (2003). Mentor networks and career
success: Lessons for turbulent times. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 78-91.
Dobrow, S. , & Higgins, M. C. (2005). Developmental networks and professional identity: A
longitudinal study. Special Issue on Mentoring, Career Development International, 10(6-7),
567-583.
Dutton, J. E. & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high quality connections. In K. S.
Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 263-
278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Ely, R. J. , & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The moderating effects of work
group perspectives on diversity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229-273.
Fagenson, E. A. (1989). The mentor advantage: Perceived career/job experiences of
protégés versus non-protégés. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 309-320.
Fletcher, J. K. (1996). A relational approach to the protean worker. In D. T. Hall (Ed.), The
career is dead—Long live the career: A relational approach to careers (pp. 101-131). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 6,
1360-1380.
Hall, D. T. (1996). Protean careers of the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive,
10(4), 8-16.
Hall, D. T. , & Associates. (1996). The career is dead—Long live the career: A relational
approach to careers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Higgins, M. C. (2000). The more, the merrier? Multiple developmental relationships and work
satisfaction. Journal of Management Development, 19, 277-296.
Higgins, M. C. (2001). Changing careers: The effects of social context. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 22, 595-618.
Higgins, M. C. (2002, August). Career consequences of developmental networks. Paper
presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Denver, CO.
Higgins, M. C. , & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A
developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264-288.
Higgins, M. C. , & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Constellations and careers: Toward understanding
the effects of multiple developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22,
223-247.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and
access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
Josselson, R. (1996). The space between us: Exploring human dimensions of human
relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life.
Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
Kram, K. E. , & Hall, D. T. (1996). Mentoring in a context of diversity and turbulence. In E. E.
Kossek & S. A. Lobel (Eds.), Managing diversity: Human resource strategies for transforming
the workplace (pp. 108-136). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business.
Lawrence, P. R. , & Lorsch, J. W. (1986). Organization and environment: Managing
differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. (Original work
published 1967)
Phillips-Jones, L. L. (1982). Mentors and protégés. New York: Arbor House.
Quinn, R. , & Dutton, J. E. (2005). Coordination as energy-in-conversation: A process theory
of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 36-57.
Ragins, B. R. , & Cotton, J. L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men
and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology,
84, 529-550.
Riley, S. , & Wrench, D. (1985). Mentoring among female lawyers. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, 15, 374-386.
Roche, G. R. (1979). Much ado about mentors. Harvard Business Review, 57, 17-28.
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and
unwritten agreements. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thomas, D. A. (1993). Racial dynamics in cross-race developmental relationships.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 169-194.
Thomas, D. A. , & Higgins, M. C. (1996). Mentoring and the boundaryless career: Lessons
from the minority experience. In M. B. Arthur & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), The boundaryless
career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era (pp. 268-281). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Thomas, D. A. , & Kram, K. E. (1988). Promoting career-enhancing relationships in
organizations: The role of the human resource professional. In M. London & E. Mone (Eds.),
The Human resource professional and employee career development (pp. 49-66). New York:
Greenwood.
Weick, K. E. , Sutcliffe, K. M. , & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability:
Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 81-123.
Whitely, W. , Dougherty, T. W. , & Dreher, G. F. (1991). Relationship of career mentoring and
socio-economic origin to managers’ and professionals’ early career progress. Academy of
Management Journal, 34, 331-351.
Zey, M. (1984). The mentor connection. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
Structural Balance in Teams
Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order: Vol 1. The center for environmental structure.
Berkeley, CA:
Amabile, T. M. , Schatzel, E. A. , Moneta, G. B. , & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors
and the work environment of creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly,
15, 5-32.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: A revolutionary approach to man’s
understanding of himself. New York: Ballantine.
Cameron, K. , Dutton, J. E. , & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational
scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Capra, F. (2003). The hidden connections. London: Flamingo.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group
development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Work-groups; sales-personnel-psychology; performance-level.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
Gruenfeld, D. , Mannix, E. , Williams, K. , & Neale, M. (1996). Group composition and
decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and
performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of
organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for
effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap
Isaacs, W. (1999). A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life: Dialogue
and the art of thinking together. New York: Doubleday.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Kahn, B. E. (2005). The power and limitations of social relational framing for understanding
consumer decision processes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 28-34.
Kantor, D. , & Lehr, W. (1975). Inside the family. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Marques, J. M. , & Paez, D. (1994). The black sheep effect: Social categorization, rejection of
ingroup deviates and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.),
European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37-68). New York: Wiley.
McGrath, J. E. , Kelly, J. R. , & Machatka, D. E. (1984). The social psychology of time:
Entrainment of behavior in social and organizational settings. Applied Social Psychology
Annual, 5, 21-44.
Nemeth, C. J. (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. Social
Cognition, 13, 275-291.
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
Poole, S. P. , & Hollingshead, A. B. (2005). Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary
perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New
York: Doubleday.
Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and
cooperation. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a
chosen course of action. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 16.
Thompson, L. (2001). Making the team: A guide for managers. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
West, M. A. (1994). Effective team work. Leicester, England: BPS Books.
Positive Relationships and Cultivating Community
Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of
capitalism. Organization Science, 12, 215-234.
Andersen, S. M. , & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive
theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619-645.
Ang, S. , & Slaughter, S. A. (2001). Work outcomes and job design for contract versus
permanent information systems professionals on software development teams. MIS
Quarterly, 25, 321.
Barley, S. R. , & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12, 76-95.
Barley, S. R. , & Kunda, G. (2004). Gurus, hired guns, and warm bodies: Itinerant experts in
a knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baumeister, R. F. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal
attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
Beenen, G. , Ling, K. , Wang, X. , Chang, K. , Frankowski, D. , Resnick, P. , et al. (2004,
November). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Paper
presented at the ACM CSCW04 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work,
Chicago.
Brickson, S. (2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational
outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Academy of Management Review, 25, 82-
101.
Brief, A. P. , & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of
Management Review, 11, 710-725.
Brief, A. P. , & Nord, W. R. (Eds.). (1990). The meaning of occupational work. Lexington, MA:
Lexington Books.
Brodsky, A. E. , & Marx, C. M. (2001). Layers of identity: Multiple psychological sense of
community within a community setting. Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 161-178.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Contingent and alternative employment arrangements.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Camden, C. T. (2003). Benefits for the free agent workforce. In O. S. Mitchell , D. S.
Blitzstein , M. Gordon , & J. Mazo (Eds.), Benefits for the workforce of the future (pp. 241-
248). Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Cappelli, P. (1999). The new deal at work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Carre, F. , Ferber, M. A. , Golden, L. , & Herzenberg, S. A. (Eds.). (2000). Nonstandard work:
The nature and challenges of changing employment arrangements. Champaign, IL: Industrial
Relations Research Association.
Chattopadhyay, P. , & George, E. (2001). Examining the effects of work externalization
through the lens of social identity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 781-788.
Collins, R. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of
Sociology, 86, 984-1014.
Dutton, J. E. , Dukerich, J. M. , & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member
identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
Dutton, J. E. , & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections at work. In K.
S. Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp.
264-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of
Management Review, 14, 532.
Fletcher, J. K. (1998). Relational practice: A feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 7, 163-186.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The development of working relationships. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.),
Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 172-189). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gittell, J. H. (2003). A relational theory of coordination. In K. S. Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R.
E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp.
279-295). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Gusfield, J. R. (1975). Community: A critical response. New York: Harper & Row.
Heath , C, & Staudenmayer, N. (2000). Coordination neglect: How lay theories of organizing
complicate coordination in organizations. In B. M. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in
organizational behavior (Vol. 22, pp. 153-191). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Hulin, C. L. , & Glomb, T. M. (1999). Contingent employees: Individual and organizational
considerations. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance:
Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 87-118). San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Kogut, B. , & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning.
Organization Science, 7, 502-518.
McMillan, D. W. , & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
Meyerson, D. , Weick, K. E. , & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R.
M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp.
166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
O’Reilly, C. A. , & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and
commitment. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior
(Vol. 18, pp. 157-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Orr, J. E. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service
culture. In D. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 169-189). London:
Sage.
Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In
D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through
conversations (pp. 171-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pratt, M. G. , & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In
K. Cameron , J. E. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp.
309-327). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Rogers, J. K. (1995). Just a temp: Experience and structure of alienation in temporary clerical
employment. Work and Occupations, 22, 137-166.
Rothaermel, F. T. , & Sugiyama, S. (2001). Virtual Internet communities and commercial
success: Individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of
TimeZone.com. Journal of Management, 27, 297-312.
Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 19, 217-233.
Rubin, H. J. , & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sandelands, L. E. (2003). Thinking about social life. Lanham, MD: University Press of
America.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sonn, C. C. , Bishop, B. J. , & Drew, N. M. (1999). Sense of community: Issues and
considerations from a cross-cultural perspective. Community, Work, and Family, 2, 205-218.
Sproull, L. , & Patterson, J. F. (2004). Making information cities livable. Communications of
the ACM, 47, 33.
Strauss, A. L. , & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory
procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel
(Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup
relations (pp. 61-76). London: Academic.
Tschan, F. , Semmer, N. K. , & Inversin, L. (2004). Work related and “private” social
interactions at work. Social Indicators Research, 67, 145-182.
Tsui, A. S. , Pearce, J. L. , Porter, L. W. , & Hite, J. P. (1995). Choice of employee-
organization relationship: Influence of external and internal organizational factors. Research
in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13, 117-151.
Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective.
In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp.
201-246). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Van Maanen, J. , & Barley, S. R. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in
organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior
(Vol. 6, pp. 287-365). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Van Maanen, J. , & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In
B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209-
264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber ( H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills , Trans.). New York: Galaxy.
Wheeler, A. R. , & Buckley, R. M. (2000). Examining the motivation process of temporary
employees: A holistic model and research framework. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16,
339-354.
Whetten, D. A. , & Godfrey, P. C. (Eds.). (1998). Identity in organizations: Building theory
through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wiesenfeld, B. W. , Raghuram, S. , & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as
determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science,
10, 777-790.
Zabusky, S. E. , & Barley, S. R. (1997). “You can’t be a stone if you’re cement”: Reevaluating
the emic identities of scientists in organizations. In B. M. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research
in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 361-404). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
History, Structure, and Practices: San Pedro Longshoremen in the
Face of Change
Anderson, C. , Keltner, D. , & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people
over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054-1068.
Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The
transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14, 312-330.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of Practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1987). Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural
Equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287-1335.
Checkoway, B. (1995). Six strategies of community change. Community Development
Journal, 30, 2-20.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , & Fitness, J. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge structures in close relationships:
A social psychological approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gusfield, J. (1975). Community: A critical response. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace &
World.
Jehn, K. , & Shah, P. (1997). Interpersonal Relationships and Task Performance: An
examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
Kanter, L. (1999, February 22). On the waterfront: Possible strike by longshoremen threatens
L.A.’s economy. Los Angeles Business Journal.
Kelley, G. J. , & Steed, L. G. (2004). Communities coping with change: A conceptual model.
Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 201-216.
McGinn, K. L. , & Keros, A. T. (2003). Improvisation and the logic of exchange in embedded
negotiations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 442-473.
McMillan, D. W. , & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory.
Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
Putnam, R. D. (1993, Spring). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life.
American Prospect, 4, 13.
Rosenkopf, L. , & Tushman, M. (1998). The coevolution of community networks and
technology: Lessons from the flight simulation industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7,
311-346.
Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structural duality, agency, and transformation. American
Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.
Small, S. A. , & Supple, A. (2001). Communities as systems: Are communities more than the
sum of their parts? In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Does it take a village? Community effects
on children, adolescents and families (pp. 161-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,
Associates.
Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review,
51, 273-286.
Turner, J. H. (1991). The structure of sociological theory (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Van Maanen, J. , & Barley, S. R. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in
organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 287-365.
Vaughn, D. (2002). Signals and interpretive work: The role of culture in a theory of practical
action. In K. A. Cerulo (Ed.), Culture in mind: Toward a sociology of culture and cognition (pp.
28-54). New York: Routledge.
Venieris, M. (2000, February). Modernization and mechanization: A tradition of partnerships.
Second Annual ILWU State of the Trade and Transportation Industry Town Hall Meeting.
(Press Release). Retrieved February 15, 2005 from
www.uces.csulb.edu/Files/PressReleases/ilwupressrel.html
Wegner, D. M. , Erber, R. , & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close
relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.
Zaccaro, S. J. , & Lowe, C. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task:
Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547-558.
Commentary: Positive Relationships in Groups and Communities
Alderfer, C. P. (1980). Consulting to underbounded systems. In C. P. Alderfer & C. L. Cooper
(Eds.), Advances in experiential social processes (Vol. 2, pp. 267-295). New York: Wiley.
Kahn, W. A. (2005). Holding fast: The struggle to create resilient caregiving organizations.
London: Brunner-Routledge.
Laing, R. D. , & Cooper, D. (1964). Reason and violence: A decade of Sartre’s philosophy,
1950-1960. London: Tavistock.
Schein, E. H. (1999). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Smith, K. K. , & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Creating and Sustaining Positive Organizational Relationships: A
Cultural Perspective
Baker, W. , Cross, R. , & Wooten, M. (2003). Positive organizational network analysis and
energizing relationships. In K. Cameron , J. Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.) Positive
organizational scholarship. Foundations in a new discipline (pp. 328-342). San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler.
Bradbury, H. , & Lichtenstein, B. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring
the space between. Organization Science, 11, 551-564.
Dutton, J. (2003a). Breathing life into organizational studies. Journal of Management Inquiry,
12, 5-19.
Dutton, J. (2003b). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality
connections at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dutton, J. , & Heaphy, E. (2003). Coming to life: the power of high quality connections at
work. In K. Cameron , J. Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp.
263-278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Feldman, M. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change.
Organization Science, 15, 295-309.
Feldman, S. P. (1986). Management in context: An essay on the relevance of culture to the
understanding of organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 23, 587-607.
Fletcher, J. (1998). Relational practice: A feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 7, 163-186.
Golden, K. (1992). The individual and organizational culture: Strategies for action in highly-
ordered contexts. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 1-21.
Hegelsen, S. (1990). The female advantage—Women’s ways of leadership. New York:
Doubleday/ Currency.
Hofer-Gittell, J. (2001). Supervisory span, relational coordination and flight departure
performance: A reassessment of post-bureaucracy theory. Organization Science, 12, 467-
482.
Hofer-Gittell, J. (2002). Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational
coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects.
Management Science, 48, 1408-1426.
Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martin, J. , Frost, P. J. , & O’Neill, O. A. (2006). Organizational culture: Beyond struggle for
intellectual dominance. In S. Clegg , C. Hardy , W. Nord , & T. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of
organization studies (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Rosen, M. (1985). Breakfast at Spiro’s: Dramaturgy and dominance. Journal of Management,
11, 31-48.
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 28, 339-358.
Surrey, J. (1991). The self-in-relation: A theory of women’s development. In J. Jordan , A.
Kaplan , J. Baker Miller , I. Stiver , & J. Surrey (Eds.), Women’s growth in connection (pp. 51-
66). New York: Guilford.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review,
51, 273-286.
Weick, K. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Westley, F. (1990). Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion. Strategic
Management Journal, 11, 337-351.
Worline, M. , Dutton, J. , Frost, P. , Kanov, J. , Lilius, J. , & Maitlis, S. (Invited revision).
Fertile soil: The organizing dynamics of resilience in work organizations.
My Family, My Firm: How Familial Relationships Function as
Endogenous Organizational Resources
Baker, W. (2000). Achieving success through social capital: Tapping the hidden resources in
your personal and business networks. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Baker, W. , Cross, R. , & Wooten, M. (2003). Positive organizational network analysis and
energizing relationships. In K. Cameron , J. Dutton , & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive
organizational scholarship (pp. 328-342). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of
Management, 17, 99-120.
Bartunek, J. , & Lacey, C. (1998). The roles of narrative in understanding work group
dynamics associated with a dramatic event: Confronting alcoholism. In J. Wagner (Ed.),
Advances in qualitative organizational research (Vol. 1, pp. 33-66). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Cameron, K. , & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational cultures. New
York: Addison-Wesley.
Casey, C. (1999). “Come join our family”: Discipline and integration in corporate
organizational culture. Human Relations, 52, 155-180.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of
Sociology, 34(Suppl.), 95-120.
Cross, R. , Baker, W. , & Parker, A. (2003). What creates energy in organizations?. Sloan
Management Review, 44, 51-56.
Davis, G. F. , & Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for theory about organizations in the early 21st
century: Exemplars from new institutional theory. Organization Science, 16, 332-343.
Dutton, J. E. (2003). Energize your workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Glynn, M. A. , & Lacey, R. (2004, August). Celebrity CEO and personalization of the
organization identity: Illustrations from Martha Stewart. Paper presented at the 2004
Academy of Management meeting, New Orleans, LA.
Haveman, H. A. , & Rao, H. (1997). Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and
organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102,
1606-1651.
Hedstrom, P. , & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social
theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Helfat, C. E. (2003). Stylized facts regarding the evolution of organizational resources and
capabilities. In C. Helfat (Ed.), The Blackwell/Strategic Management Society handbook of
organizational capabilities: Emergence, development, and change (pp. 1-14). Maiden, MA:
Blackwell.
Lounsbury, M. , & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy and the
acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545-564.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1983). Who controls whom? An examination of the relationship between
management and boards of directors of large American corporations. Academy of
Management Review, 8, 426-435.
Paine, L. S. , & Katz, J. P. (2002). Case study: Levi Strauss & Co: Global sourcing (A). In T.
Donaldson , P. H. Werhane , & M. Cording (Eds.), Ethical issues in business (7th ed., pp
432-471). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Pearson, C. M. , Andersson, L. M. , & Porath, C. L. (2000, Fall). Assessing and attacking
workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 123-137.
Perlow, L. A. (1998). Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-
tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 328-359.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New
York: Simon & Schuster.
Robinson, S. L. , & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of
work groups on antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41,
658-672.
Rook, K. S. (1984). Negative social interactions: Impact on psychological well-being. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1097-1108.
Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and
family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655-684.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stewart, M. (1997). Letter from Martha, Martha Steward Living magazine, April, p. 12.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches.
Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management
Journal, 43, 178-190.
Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-
1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.
Enabling Positive Social Capital in Organizations
Abrams, L. C. , Cross, R. , Lesser, E. , & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in
knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Science Executive, 17, 64-77.
Adler, P. S. , & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of
Management Review, 27, 17-40.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Baker, W. (2000). Achieving success through social capital. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Baker, W. E. , Cross, R. , & Parker, A. (2003, Summer). What creates energy in
organizations? Sloan Management Review, 44, 51-56.
Baker, W. E. , & Faulkner, R. R. (2004). Social networks and loss of capital. Social Networks,
26, 91-111.
Bamford, J. D. , Gomes-Casseres, B. J. , & Robinson, M. S. (2003). Mastering alliance
strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (injustice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R.
Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 85-108), Stanford, CA: Stanford
University Press.
Brown, S. L. , Nesse, R. M. L. , Vinokur, A. D. , & Smith, D. M. (2003). Providing social
support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of
mortality. Psychological Science, 14, 320-327.
Cameron, K. S. , Dutton, J. E. , & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational
scholarship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Carmeli, A. (2005). Fostering vitality, growth, resilience and learning processes in
organizational members: The role of high-quality connections (Working paper). Ramat Gan,
Israel: Bar-Han University.
Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: Quill/William
Morrow.
Cohen, D. , & Prusak, L. (2001). In Good company: How social capital makes organizations
work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of
Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Cross, R. , Baker, W. E. , & Parker, A. (2002). Charged up: The creation and depletion of
energy in social networks (Working paper). Cambridge, MA: IBM Institute for Knowledge-
Based Organizations.
Cross, R. , & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of networks. Boston: Howard Business
School Press.
Crozier, M. (1964). The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, J. (2001). Good to great. New York: HarperBusiness.
Dutton, J. (2003). Energize your workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dutton, J. , & Heaphy, E. (2003). The power of high quality connections. In K. Cameron , J.
Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.). Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 263-278). San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler.
Dutton, J. E. , Worline, M. , Frost, R. , & Lilius, J. (2005). Explaining compassion organizing
competence (Working paper). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Positive
Organizational Scholarship, Stephen M. Ross School of Business.
Feldman, M. S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change.
Organization Science, 15, 295-309.
Feldman, M. , & Dutton, J. (2005, August). Creating capacity from within: Understanding
endogenous resourcefulness in organizations. Paper presented at the National Academy of
Management meetings, Honolulu, HI.
Fernandez, R. , Castilla, E. , & Moore, P. (2000). Social capital at work: Networks and
employment at a phone center. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1288-1356.
Fletcher, J. (1999). Disappearing acts. Boston: MIT Press.
Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and
frequency on favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management
Journal, 46, 539-553.
Fredrickson, B.L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology,
2, 300-319.
Gada, H. , Glover, M. , & Tsai, T. (2004). IDEO: The enabling of positive social capital for
innovation. Team project, Social Capital for Managerial Effectiveness (M0624), Fall.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Gittell, J. F. (2003). The Southwest Airlines way: Using the power of relationships to achieve
high performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 25, 161-
178.
Homans, G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace &
World.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at
work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
Kouzes, J. , & Posner, B. (2002). The leadership challenge (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Labianca, G. , Umphress, E. , & Kaufmann, J. (2000). A preliminary test of the negative
asymmetry hypothesis in workplace social networks. Paper presented at the National
Academy of Management meetings, Toronto.
Losada, M. (1999). The complex dynamics of high performance teams. Mathematical and
Computer Modeling, 30, 179-192.
Losada, M. , & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance
of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 740-765.
Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed
organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249-273.
Podolny, J. (1992). Interview with John Clendenin [video]. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business
School.
Pfeffer, J. , & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap. Boston: Harvard Business School
Press.
Prusak, L. , & Cohen, D. (2001, January). How to invest in social capital. Harvard Business
Review, 79, 86-93.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New
York: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, R. , & Feldstein, L. M. (2003). Better together: Restoring the American community.
New York: Simon & Schuster.
Reiss, H. T. , Sheldon, K. M. , Gable, S. , Roscoe, J. , & Ryan, M. (2000). Daily well-being:
The role of autonomy, competence and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 25, 419-435.
Seabright, P. (2004). The company of strangers: A natural history of economic life. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Spreitzer, G. , Sutcliffe, K. , Dutton, J. , Sonenshein, S. , & Grant, A. (2004). A socially
embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537-549.
Taylor, M. (1982). Community, anarchy, and liberty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vogus, T. (2004). In search of mechanisms: How do HR practices affect organizational
performance? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Wenger, E. , McDermott, R. , & Snyder, W. N. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice.
Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Worline, M. , Dutton, J. , Frost, P. , Lilius, J. , & Kanov, J. (2004). Fertile soil: The organizing
dynamics of resilience in work organizations (Working paper). Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan.
Leadership, Power, and Positive Relationships
Aaltio-Marjosola, I. (2001, September). Charismatic leadership, manipulation and the
complexity of organizational life. Paper presented at the MIT Sloan School of Management
Organizational Studies Seminar Series, Cambridge, MA.
Agashae, Z. , & Bratton, J. (2001). Leader-follower dynamics: Developing a learning
environment. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(3-4), 89-103.
Babcock, L. , & Laschever, S. (2003). Women don’t ask. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press.
Badaracco, J. (2002). Leading quietly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Baker, W. (2000). Achieving success through social capital. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bartolome, F. , & Laurent, A. (1988). Managers: Torn between two roles. Personnel Journal,
67, 72-83.
Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Beer, M. (1999). Leading learning and learning to lead. In J. Conger , G. Spreitzer , & E.
Lawler (Eds.), The leader’s change handbook (pp. 127-161). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Berg, D. (1998). Resurrecting the muse: Followership in organizations. In E. B. Klein , F.
Gaibelnick , & P. Herr (Eds.), The psychodynamics of leadership (pp. 27-52). Madison, CT:
Psychosocial Press.
Bradbury, H. , & Lichtenstein, B. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring
the space between. Organization Science, 11, 551-566.
Brewer, M. , & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self
representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-88.
Bryman, A. (1996). Leadership in organizations. In S. Clegg , C. Hardy , & W. Nord (Eds.),
Handbook of organization studies (pp. 276-292). London: Sage.
Calvert, L. , & Ramsey, V. J. (1992). Bringing women’s voice to research on women in
management: A feminist perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1, 79-88.
Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Collins, J. (2001). Good to great. New York: Harper Business.
Conger, J. (1989). Leadership: The art of empowering others. Academy of Management
Executive, 3, 17-24.
Conger, J. , Spreitzer, G. , & Lawler, E. (Eds.). (1999). The leader’s change handbook. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cox, J. , Pearce, C. , & Sims, H. P. (2003). Toward a broader leadership development
agenda: Extending the traditional transactional-transformation duality by developing directive,
empowering and shared leadership skills. In S. Murphy & R. Riggio (Eds.), The future of
leadership development (pp. 161-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cross, R. , Baker, W. , & Parker, A. (2003). What creates energy in organizations. MIT Sloan
Management Review, 44(4), 51-56.
Day, D. , Gronn, P. , & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership
Quarterly, 75(6), 857-868.
Dutton, J. (2003). Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high quality
connections at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dutton, J. , Debebe, G. , & Wrzesniewski, A. (1998, January). Being valued and devalued at
work. Paper presented at ICOS Seminar, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Dutton, J. , & Heaphy, E. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. In K. Cameron , J.
Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp 263-278). San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler.
Fairbairn, W. D. R. (1952). An object relations theory of personality. New York: Basic Books.
Feldman, M. , & Khademian, A. (2003). Empowerment and cascading vitality. In K. Cameron
, J. Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 343-358). San
Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Fiske, S. , & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fletcher, J. K. (1994). Castrating the female advantage. Journal of Management Inquiry, 3,
74-82.
Fletcher, J. K. (1996). A relational approach to developing the protean worker. In D. T. Hall &
Associates (Eds.), The career is dead—Long live the career. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power and relational practice at work.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of post heroic leadership: An essay on gender, power
and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 647-661.
Fletcher, J. K. , & Jacques, R. (2000). Relational practice: An emerging stream of theorizing
and its significance for organizational studies (CGO Working Paper). Boston: Simmons
School of Management, Center for Gender in Organizations.
Fletcher, J. K. , & Kaeufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership: Paradox and possibility. In C.
Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership
(pp. 21-47). London: Sage.
Foldy, E. (2002). Be all that you can be. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Boston College,
Boston.
Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. New York: Longmans Green.
Fondas, N. (1997). Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings.
Academy of Management Review, 22, 257-282.
Fredrickson, B. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In K.
Cameron , J. Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 163-175).
San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Gardner, H. (1990). On leadership. New York: The Free Press.
Gittell, J. (2003). A theory of relational coordination. In K. Cameron , J. Dutton , & R. Quinn
(Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 279-295). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
Goleman, D. , Boyatzis R. , & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
Business School Press.
Graen, G. B. , & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L.
Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 175-208).
Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Graen, G. B. , & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership:
Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory over 25 years: Applying a multi-level
multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
Hargadon, A. (2003). How breakthroughs happen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School
Press.
Harrington, M. (2000). Care and equality. New York: Routledge.
Heifitz, R. , & Laurie, D. (1999). Mobilizing adaptive work: Beyond visionary leadership. In J.
Conger , G. Spreitzer , & E. Lawler (Eds.), The leader’s change handbook (pp. 55-86). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Helgeson, S. (1990). The female advantage. New York: Doubleday.
Hill, L. (2004). New manager development for the 21st century. The Academy of
Management Executive, 75(3), 121
Hirschorn, L. (1990). Leaders and followers in a postindustrial age: A psychodynamic view.
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26(4), 529-542.
Holvino, E. (2001). Complicating gender: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in
organizing change(ing) (CGO Working Paper No. 13). Boston: Simmons School of
Management, Center for Gender in Organizations.
Hosking, D. , Dachler, H. P. , & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.). (1995). Management and organization:
Relational alternative to individualism. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
Howell, J. , & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process:
Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30, 96-112.
Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together. New York: Doubleday Currency.
Jacques, R. (1993). Untheorized dimensions of caring work: Caring as a structural practice
and caring as a way of seeing. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 17(2), 1-10.
Jordan, J. (1986). The meaning of mutuality (Working Paper No. 23). Wellesley, MA: Centers
for Women.
Jordan, J. V. (1991). The movement of mutuality and power (Working Paper No. 53).
Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College Centers for Women.
Jordan, J. (1999). Toward connection and competence (Working Paper No. 83). Wellesley,
MA: Centers for Women.
Jordan, J. , Kaplan, A. , Miller, J. B. , Stiver, I. , & Surrey, J. (Eds.). (1991). Women’s growth
in connection. New York: Guilford.
Jost, J. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed entitlement effect among
women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387-393.
Kahane, A. (2004). Solving tough problems. Berkeley, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Kahn, W. (1998). Relational systems at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.),
Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 39-76). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Kanter, R. M. (2001). E-volve! Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kayes, D. C. (2004). The 1996 Mount Everest climbing disaster: The breakdown of learning
in teams. Human Relations, 57, 1263-1285.
Khuruna, R. (2003). Searching for a corporate savior: The irrational quest for charismatic
CEOs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kim, D. H. (1993), The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan
Management Review, 34, 37-50.
Kouzes, J. , & Posner, B. (2003). The leadership challenge (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Kram, K. (1996). A relational approach to career development. In D. T. Hall (Ed.), The career
is dead—Long live the career: A relational approach to careers (pp. 132-157). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lave, J. , & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, F. , Caza, A. , Edmondson, A. , & Thomke, S. (2003). NCW knowledge creation in
organizations. In K. Cameron , J. Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational
scholarship (pp. 194-206). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Levinson, D. J. (1978). Seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.
Lipman Blumen, J. (1996). The connective edge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lipnack, J. , & Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual teams. New York: Wiley.
Lord, R. G. , & Maher, K. J. (1993). Leadership and information processing: Linking
perceptions and performance. Boston: Routledge.
Losada, M. , & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance
of business teams. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 740-765.
Luthans, F. , & Avolio, B. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In K. Cameron , J.
Dutton , & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241-258). San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler.
Manz, C. C. , & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2001). The new superleadership: Leading others to lead
themselves. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Marsick, V. , & Watkins, P. (1999). Facilitating learning organizations: Making learning count.
Alder-shot, England: Gower.
Martin, P. Y. (1996). Gendering and evaluating dynamics: Men, masculinities and
managements. In D. Collinson & J. Hearn (Eds.), Men as mangers, mangers as men (pp.
186-209). London: Sage.
Martin, P. Y. , & Collinson, D. L. (1998). Gender and sexuality in organizations. In M. M.
Ferree , J. Lorder , & B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 285-310). London: Sage.
Mayo, M. , Meindl, J. R. , & Pastor, J. (2003). Shared leadership in work teams: A social
network approach. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows
and whys of leadership (pp. 21-47). London: Sage.
McNamee, S. , & Gergen, K. J. (1999). Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable
dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
Miller, J. B. (1984). The development of women’s sense of self (Working Paper No. 12).
Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College Centers for Women.
Miller, J. B. , & Stiver, I. (1997). The healing connection. Boston: Beacon.
Pearce, C. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to
transform knowledge work. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47-57.
Pearce, C. , & Conger, J. (2003a). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of
shared leadership. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows
and whys of leadership (pp. 3-13). London: Sage.
Pearce, C. , & Conger, J. (2003b). A landscape of opportunities: Future research on shared
leadership. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and
whys of leadership (pp. 285-304). London: Sage
Pearce, C. , & Sims, H. (2000). Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership.
In M. Beyerlein , D. Johnson , & S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in the interdisciplinary studies
of work teams (Vol. 7, pp. 115-139). New York: JAI.
Peters, T. (2003). Re-imagine! New York: DK Publishing.
Ragins, B. R. (2005). Towards a theory of relational mentoring. Unpublished manuscript.
Rudman, L. , & Glick, P. (2001). Gender effects on social influence and hireability:
Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social
Issues, 57(4), 743-762.
Seely Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
Business School Press.
Senge, P. (1990a). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.
Senge, P. (1990b). The leader’s new work: Building learning organizations. Sloan
Management Review, 32(1), 7-23.
Senge, P. , & Kaeufer, K. (2001). Communities of leaders or no leadership at all. In S.
Chowdhury (Ed.), Management 21C (pp. 186-204). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Sinclair, A. (1998). Doing leadership differently. Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Melbourne
University Press.
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine
communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Surrey, J. (1985). The self in relation (Working paper No. 13). Wellesley, MA: Wellesley
College, Centers for Women.
Sutcliffe, K. , & Vogus, T. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. Cameron , J. Dutton , & R.
Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 94-110). San Francisco: Berrett-
Koehler.
Thompson, L. (2004). Making the team (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vera, D. , & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Academy
of Management Review, 29, 222-240.
Vera, D. , & Rodriquez-Lopez, A. (2004). Strategic virtues: Humility as a source of
competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 3, 393-408.
Wade, M. E. (2001). Women and salary negotiations: The cost of self-advocacy. Psychology
of Women Quarterly, 25, 65-76.
Walker, M. (2002). Power and effectiveness: Envisioning an alternative paradigm (Working
Paper No. 94). Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College, Centers for Women.
Watkins, K.E. , & Cervero, R. M. (2000). Organizations as contexts for learning: A case study
in certified accountancy. Journal of Workplace Learning, 72(5-6), 187-194.
West, C. , & Zimmerman, D. (1991). Doing gender. In J. Lorber & S. Farrell (Eds.), The social
construction of gender (pp. 13-37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Wheatley, M. (2001). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world.
London: Sage.
Winnicott, D. (1958). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. New York:
International Universities Press.
Yukl, G. P. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zaleznik, A. (1992). Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review,
70, 126-136.
Commentary: Following the Resources in Positive Organizational
Relationships
Argyris, C. (1962). Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness. Homewood,
IL: Dorsey.
Baba, M. , Gluesing, J. , Ratner, H. , & Wagner, K. H. (2004). The contexts of knowing:
natural history of a globally distributed team. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 547-
587.
Buntman, F. L. (2003). Robben Island and prisoner resistance to apartheid. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
Cascio, W. F. , & Kellerman, R. (2005). Leadership lessons from Robben Island: A manifesto
for the moral high ground. Unpublished manuscript.
Collela, A. (2001). Coworker distributive fairness judgments of the workplace accommodation
of employees with disabilities. Academy of Management Review, 26, 100-116.
D’Iribarne, P. (2002). Motivating workers in emerging countries: Universal tools and local
adaptations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 243-256.
Foa, U. G. , & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Leana, C. , & Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Relational wealth: The advantages of stability in a
changing economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Meckler, M. , Drake, B. H. , Levinson, H. (2003). Putting psychology back into psychological
contracts. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 217-228.
Merriam-Webster. (2005). On-line Thesaurus. Retrieved September 27, 2005, from
http://www.mw.com/cgi-bin/thesaurus?book=Thesaurus
Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 45-67.
Rousseau, D. M. (2005). I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals workers bargain for themselves. New
York: Sharpe.
Rousseau, D. M. , & Ho, V. (2000). Psychological contract issues in compensation. In S.
Rynes & B. Gephart (Eds.), Compensation (pp. 273-310). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
Seligman, M. E. P. , Steen, T. A. , Park, N. , & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology
progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410-421.
Stajkovic, A. , & Luthans, F. (1998). Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Going beyond
traditional motivational and behavioral approaches. Organizational Dynamics, 26, 66-77.
Wade-Benzoni, K. (1996). Intergenerational justice: Discounting, reciprocity, and fairness as
factors that influence how resources are allocated. Unpublished paper. Evanston, IL:
Northwestern University, Kellogg School.
Welbourne, T. (2005). The energy-engagement cycle: Is it broken in your organization?
Retrieved August, 14, 2005, from www.umich.edu
Williamson, O. (1985). The economics institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational
contracting. London: Collier Macmillan.
Moving Forward: Positive Relationships at Work as a Research
Frontier
Anderson, P. , Blatt, R. , Christianson, M. , Grant, A. , Marquis, C. , Newman, E. , et al.
(2006). Social mechanisms in organizational research: Insights from a collective journey.
Journal of Management Inquiry.
Bradbury, H. , & Lichtenstein, B. M. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring
the space between. Organization Science, 11, 551-564.
Dacin, T. , Ventresca, M. , & Beal, B. D. (1999). The embeddedness of organizations:
Dialogue & directions Journal of Management, 25, 317-356.
Feldman, M. (2005, August). Understanding endogeneity. Paper presented at the National
Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
Gergen, K. (1994). Realities and relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General
Psychology, 6, 307-324.
Jordan, J. , Kaplan, A. , Miller, J. B. , Stiver, I. , & Surrey, J. (Eds.). (1991). Women’s growth
in connection. New York: Guilford.
Kahn, W. A. (1998). Relational systems at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.),
Research in organizational behavior (pp. 39-76). Greenwich, CT.: JAI.
Leana, C. , & Rousseau, D. (Eds.). (2000). Relational wealth: The advantages of stability in a
changing economy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Miller, J. B. , & Stiver, I. (1997). The healing connection. Boston: Beacon.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review,
51, 273-286.