1 s2.0 S1434841118322325 Main
1 s2.0 S1434841118322325 Main
Regular paper
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In this work, a broadband millimeter-wave (mm-wave) multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) antenna
Received 19 August 2018 system for upcoming fifth generation (5G) networks is presented. The MIMO antenna system is two ports
Accepted 14 November 2018 and realized using two antenna arrays, aligned in opposite directions. Each array consist of three ele-
ments in each, as each element is a simple recognized printed wide-slot antenna proximity excited by
microstrip line with a widened tuning stub; manipulated for operating in the Ka-band, which includes
Keywords: the 28 and 38 GHz bands, as potential candidates for 5G communications. An electromagnetic band-
Millimeter-wave
gap (EBG) reflector is placed behind the antenna structure toward the feeding network to decrease the
Ka-band
5G communications
backward radiation and improve the front-to-back (F/B) ratio. Results show that the proposed MIMO
Slot antenna array antenna system with EBG reflector provides wideband impedance bandwidth >27 GHz (from 22.5 to
Broadband antenna >50 GHz) and good radiation characteristics with a total realized gain up to 11.5 and 10.9 dBi at the
MIMO system two frequencies of interest, respectively. The envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) and diversity gain
EBG reflector (DG) were evaluated and showed good MIMO performance. These remarkable features with the benefits
of design simplicity and easily expansion to large-scale antenna system make the proposed design suit-
able for mm-wave communications.
Ó 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2018.11.029
1434-8411/Ó 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
60 A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69
Table 1
Optimized design parameters of the proposed single mm-wave 5G antenna (units in mm).
L W Lf Wf Ls Ws Lg Wg S
6.0 6.0 3.0 0.44 1.0 2.2 2.72 3.75 0.11
Fig. 2. Fabricated model of proposed the single mm-wave 5G antenna (a) top view (b) bottom view.
A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69 61
Fig. 3. Simulated (CST MWS) reflection coefficient |S11| curves versus frequency of the proposed single mm-wave 5G antenna (a) with and without tuning stub (b) for various
tuning stub widths, Ws. (c) for various tuning stub lengths, Ls (d) for various tuning stub locations, S. (Other parameters are the same as listed in Table 1)
controlling the radiation from the ground plane aperture. The per-
formance of the proposed broadband antenna is analyzed and opti-
mized using full-wave EM simulators, Computer Simulation
Technology (CST) Microwave Studio (MWS) and ANSYS high-
frequency structural simulator (HFSS). CST simulation was per-
formed using time-domain solver, whereas HFSS simulation was
performed using frequency-domain solver. We have used the both
simulation methods for sake of comparison, due to the unavailabil-
ity of an mm-wave anechoic chamber for measuring the radiation
characteristics of the antenna system. The optimized antenna
parameters are shown in a tabulated form in Table 1. To examine
the actual performance and validate the simulation results, the
antenna prototypes during design evolution process were fabri-
cated and their performances in terms of S-parameters were mea-
sured by Rohde & Schwarz ZVA 67 Vector Network Analyzer using
Fig. 4. Measured and simulated reflection coefficient |S11| curves and simulated
50 X ports. For the measurement considerations, the ground plane
realized gain values versus frequency of the proposed single mm-wave 5G antenna.
as well as the microstrip feeding line of the antenna prototypes
were extended long enough for placing the commercial 1.85 mm
End Launch Connector [35]. However, this process has not notice-
rectangular aperture etched on the ground plane and proximity fed able effect in the measured performance. Fabricated model of the
by a 50 X microstrip feed line placed on the other side of the proposed single mm-wave 5G antenna is shown in Fig. 2.
antenna substrate. To enhance the coupling between the feed line The reflection coefficient |S11| curves of the proposed single
and radiating aperture and thus improve the impedance matching, mm-wave 5G antenna with and without a tuning stub are shown
a widened tuning stub was connected to the end of the microstrip in Fig. 3(a). It can be clearly observed that the impedance matching
feed line toward the origin of the coordinate system of the antenna of the antenna is strongly depends on the tuning stub. Parametric
in such way as reported in [34]. Proximity-fed scheme was chosen study given in Fig. 3(b)–(d) which performed with CST MWS, show
with a widened tuning stub for much more degrees of freedom in that the impedance bandwidth is mainly determined by the width,
62 A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69
Fig. 5. Geometrical configuration and parameters of the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system backed by EBG reflector (a) 2D view (b) 3D view.
Table 2
Optimized design parameters of the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system with EBG reflector (units in mm).
Lm Wm L1 W1 L2 W2 L3 W3 Sh Sv Rc Wc We Lc Lr d
20 53 1.2 0.7 1.1 1.1 1.0 2.0 5.25 8.0 0.95 0.15 0.15 0.51 31.7 3.5
length and location of the tuning stub beneath the ground plane shown in Fig. 4. The measured and simulated curves match well
slot. The effect of each parameter is shown with excluding the with each other. The tested antenna model achieved operation
effect of the other ones. By properly adjusting these parameters, bandwidth (|S11| < 10 dB) from 20 to beyond 50 GHz, which
a wide impedance bandwidth can be obtained. In this study, the covers the 28 and 38 GHz sub-frequency bands. The simulated
tuning stub width of Ws = 2.2 mm, length of Ls = 1.0 mm, and gain variation is also shown in Fig. 4. Result shows that the max-
location of S = 0.11 mm are considered to perform broadband imum peak gain is about 4.5 dBi over the operating band of inter-
operation of higher than 72% from 23.5 to more than 50 GHz est. Average realized peak gain values of 4.1 and 3.9 dBi are
for a reflection coefficient lower than 10 dB. Comparison of calculated at the two considered frequencies of 28 and 38 GHz,
measured and simulated reflection coefficient |S11| curves is respectively.
A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69 63
Fig. 6. Fabricated models of the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna system during the design evolution process (a) three-element array (b) two-port MIMO antenna array
system (c) EBG reflector.
Fig. 7. Simulated (CST MWS) S-parameters curves versus frequency of the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system for various confrontation edge-to-edge
spacings between antenna elements, Sh (a) |S11| (b) |S21|.
Fig. 8. Simulated (CST MWS) S-parameters curves versus frequency of the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system for various interleaving spacings between the
two arrays in the MIMO structure, Sv (a) |S11| (b) |S21|.
64 A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69
Fig. 9. Simulated (CST MWS) surface current distributions on the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system at (a) 28 GHz (b) 38 GHz.
Fig. 11. Measured and simulated S-parameters curves versus frequency of the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system. (a) |S11| (b) |S21|.
A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69 65
Fig. 12. Simulated realized peak gain values versus frequency of the proposed (a) three-element mm-wave 5G antenna array (b) two-port mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array
system.
Fig. 14. Measured and simulated S-parameters curves versus frequency of the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system backed by EBG reflector. (a) |S11| (b) |S21|.
66 A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69
Fig. 15. Diversity performance from simulated 3D radiation patterns of the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system backed by EBG reflector. (a) ECC (b) DG.
Fig. 16. Simulated normalized 2D gain patterns using CST MWS (blue solid line) and HFSS (red dashed line) for the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system
backed by EBG reflector at 28 GHz in xz-plane (left) and yz-plane (right), (a) port 1 (b) port 2. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is
referred to the web version of this article.)
teristics, which is a bout quarter wavelength at the lowest operat- The measured and simulated reflection coefficient and isolation
ing frequency of 22.5 GHz. Fig. 13 shows the reflection phase curves of the proposed antenna system after using the EBG reflector
results of the EBG unit cell carried out via CST simulation. As seen is shown in Fig. 14(a) and (b), respectively. The complete antenna
from the curve, the zero reflection phase is obtained at 38 GHz. system can achieve measured impedance bandwidth ranging from
A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69 67
22.5 to more than 50 GHz with |S11| < 10 dB except a where q12 is the correlation coefficient between arrays 1 and 2, qe12
little > 10 dB at 29–33 GHz is observed. Good measured isolation is the envelop correlation coefficient between arrays 1 and 2, and
of more than 20 dB is observed over the most of the operating band- Ei ðh; /Þ is the complex 3D radiated field pattern for array i.
width. However, the performance of this structure is worse than the Fig. 15(a) shows the ECC of the complete MIMO antenna system
antenna structure before using the EBG reflector. The worst-case evaluated via CST and HFSS simulations, with reasonable agree-
simulated isolation value of 10 dB was observed at 42 GHz. ment between them. It can be seen that the ECC values are less
It should be noted that the port isolation and correlation coeffi- than 0.12 across the operating band, which are below the accept-
cient of the antenna system are two different quantities and both able limit defined by less than 0.5, indicating that the proposed
are required to evaluate the performance of MIMO system, in which MIMO antenna can provide good pattern diversity performance.
high isolation (low coupling) does not guarantee a low correlation The diversity gain (DG) is another parameter that can be used to
coefficient [24]. The square of the correlation coefficient is known evaluate the diversity performance of the MIMO antenna system.
as the envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) which is used to evalu- The DG can be calculated as [37]
ate diversity performance of the MIMO system. The ECC metric is pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
important because it shows the amount of channel isolation in a DG ¼ 10 1 qe12 ð2Þ
wireless communication link. ECC can be calculated from the
embedded 3D far field radiation patterns or the scattering parame- The DG of complete MIMO antenna system is illustrated in
ters. However, it is worthy to mention that calculating the ECC val- Fig. 15(b). It can be seen that the calculated results using both
ues from S-parameters is not completely correct and greatly CST MWS and HFSS are in a good agreement and shows DG of more
underestimates its values when evaluating any lossy antenna [24]. than 9.4 dB within the frequency band of interest.
The ECC (qe) can be computed using the complex field data, The normalized simulated 2D far-field gain patterns in terms of
based on the assumption of having an isotropic wireless environ- Etotal for the proposed MIMO antenna array system with EBG reflec-
ment as [36] tor at 28 and 38 GHz in xz- and yz-planes when port 1 and port 2
ZZ 2 were separately excited (while other port is matched) are illus-
½E1 ðh; /Þ E2 ðh; /Þ trated in Figs. 16 and 17, respectively. The simulated results using
4p
ECC ¼ jq12 j2 ¼ qe12 ¼ ZZ ZZ ð1Þ the two simulators are in a good agreement; while the slight
2 2
jE1 ðh; /Þj dX jE2 ðh; /Þj dX mismatch may be attributed to imperfect of the simulation. The
4p 4p nulls occur in the boresight direction because the relatively large
Fig. 17. Simulated normalized 2D gain patterns using CST MWS (blue solid line) and HFSS (red dashed line) for the proposed mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna array system
backed by EBG reflector at 38 GHz in xz-plane (left) and yz-plane (right), (a) port 1 (b) port 2. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is
referred to the web version of this article.)
68 A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69
Fig. 18. Simulated radiation characteristics of the proposed MIMO antenna system backed by EBG reflector. (a) Realized peak gain (b) radiation efficiency.
Table 3
Figures of merits of the mm-wave 5G MIMO antenna arrays for 5G networks.
Ref. Antenna type No. of Ground size* mm3 10 dB-BW, Max. Rad. Min. ECC
Ports GHz gain, dBi efficiency, % isolation, dB
[29] Metallic-based PIFA antenna 3 20.26 10.26 0.321 27.73–28.54 6.06 98 13 0.0006
1.87k 0 0.95k 0 0.03k 0
[30] Metallic-based patch antenna 4 26 19.25 0.79 26.1–30.2 7.58 86.37 20 0.004
2.26k 0 1.676k 0 0.07k 0 37.3–39.3 5.72 88.62
[31] Metallic-based dipole antenna 4 48 31 0.254 26–31 10 NA 21 0.0015
4.16k 0 2.69k 0 0.022k 0
[32] Metallic-based slot antenna 2 50 25 1 3–30 NA NA 20 NA
0.5k 0 0.25k 0 0.01k 0
[33] DR-based antenna 2 48 21 0.127 29.7–31.5 7 80 25 0.002
4.75k 0 2.08k 0 0.01k 0
This Work Metallic-based slot antenna 2 53 31.7 3.906 22.5–50 15 >85 20 0.12
(with EBG reflector) 3.97k 0 2.38k 0 0.29k 0
*
k0 is free-space wavelength, calculated at the lowest frequency band for 10 dB-BW.
spacing between array element. However, the antenna still exhi- width of more than 81.7% ranging from 22.5 to beyond 50 GHz
bits good radiation and acceptable diversity performance as shown (10 dB return loss) and offers realized peak gain values of about
in Fig. 15. The simulated realized gain and radiation efficiency of 11.5 and 10.9 dBi and estimated radiation efficiency values of
the complete antenna structure using both CST MWS and HFSS about 95% and 87% at the two considered frequencies of 28 and
simulators with good agreement between them are shown in 38 GHz, respectively. Compact size and acceptable performance
Fig. 18(a) and (b), respectively. Fig. 18(a) shows that the gain varies make the proposed antenna system competitive for upcoming 5G
in the range of 9–15 dBi within the whole operation band (22.5– networks.
50 GHz) which is generally stable. The realized peak gain values
in the boresight direction at 28 and 38 GHz are 11.5 and 10.9
dBi, respectively, while Fig. 18(b) shows that the minimum effi- References
ciency values are 95% and 87% at the two frequencies of interest,
[1] Ying Z. Antennas in cellular phones for mobile communications. Proc IEEE
respectively, in which the good port isolation enhanced the system 2012;100:2286–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2186214.
efficiency by increasing the power that is delivered to the antenna. [2] Andrews JG, Buzzi S, Choi W, Hanly SV, Lozano A, Soong ACK, et al. What will
To better identify the performance of the proposed MIMO 5G be? IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2014;32:1065–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/
JSAC.2014.2328098.
antenna system (with EBG reflector) with respect to the state-of- [3] Saad AAR, Ali MM, Khaled EM. An integrated 3G/Bluetooth and UWB antenna
the-art, Table 3 compares the figures of merit of some designs pre- with a band-notched feature. J Electromag Waves Appl 2013;27:2430–41.
sented in recent publications. The key performances of the pro- https://doi.org/10.1080/09205071.2013.854179.
[4] Li Y, Li W, Ye Q. A reconfigurable wide slot antenna integrated with SIRs for
posed antenna system are the reasonable performance over UWB/multiband communication applications. Microw Opt Technol Lett
extremely-wide bandwidth, furthermore the easily expansion to 2013;55:52–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.27253.
large-scale antenna system. [5] Li Y, Li W, Mittra R. A compact CPW-fed circular slot antenna with
reconfigurable dual band-notch characteristics for UWB communication
applications. Microw Opt Technol Lett 2014;56:465–8. https://doi.org/
10.1002/mop.28087.
4. Conclusion [6] Li Y, Li W, Ye Q. A compact circular slot UWB antenna with multimode
reconfigurable band-notched characteristics using resonator and switch
A simple mm-wave MIMO slot antenna system has been techniques. Microw Opt Technol Lett 2014;56:570–4. https://doi.org/
10.1002/mop.28152.
designed for future 5G networks, consisting of two, three-
[7] Li Y, Li W, Mittra R. Miniaturized CPW-FED UWB antenna with dual frequency
element metallic arrays. EBG reflector was employed to decrease rejection bands using stepped impedance stub and arc-shaped parasitic
the backward radiation and improve the F/B ratio. Design evolution element. Microw Opt Technol Lett 2014;56:783–7. https://doi.org/
of the proposed MIMO antenna array system has been described 10.1002/mop.28228.
[8] Saad AAR, Mohamed HA. Bandwidth enlargement of a low-profile open-ring
with performance analysis. Results show that the proposed design slot antenna based on SIW structure. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett
exhibited high field and port isolation over wide impedance band- 2017;16:2885–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2017.2751247.
A.A.R. Saad, H.A. Mohamed / Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 99 (2019) 59–69 69
[9] Niu Y, Li Y, Jin D, Su L, Vasilakos AV. A survey of millimeter wave [23] Rappaport TS, Sun S, Mayzus R, Zhao H, Azar Y, Wang K, et al. Millimeter wave
communications (mmWave) for 5G: opportunities and challenges. Wireless mobile communications for 5G cellular: It will work! IEEE Access
Netw 2015;21:2657–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-0942-z. 2013;1:335–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2260813.
[10] Ashraf N, Haraz OM, Ali MMM, Ashraf MA, Alshebili SAS. Optimized broadband [24] Sharawi MS. Current misuses and future prospects for printed multiple-input,
and dual-band printed slot antennas for future millimeter wave mobile multiple-output antenna systems. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag
communication. AEU – Int J Electron Commun 2016;70:257–64. https://doi. 2017;59:62–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2017.2658346.
org/10.1016/j.aeue.2015.12.005. [25] Jiang T, Jiao T, Li Y. A low mutual coupling MIMO antenna using periodic multi-
[11] El Shorbagy M, Shubair RM, AIHajri MI, Mallat NK. On the design of millimeter- layered electromagnetic band gap structures. Appl Computat Electrom Soc J
wave antennas for 5G. In: 16th Mediterranean Microw Symp (MMS), Abu 2018;33:305–11.
Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 14–16 November 2016. DOI: 10.1109/ [26] Yu K, Li Y, Liu X. Mutual coupling reduction of a MIMO antenna array using 3-D
MMS.2016.7803878. novel meta-material structures. Appl Comput Electrom Soc J 2018;33:758–63.
[12] Chin KS, Chang HT, Liu JA, Chao SH. 28-GHz patch antenna arrays with PCB and [27] Saleem R, Bilal M, Bajwa KB, Shafique MF. Eight-element UWB-MIMO array
LTCC Substrates. In: Proc Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wirel with three distinct isolation mechanisms. Electron Lett 2015;51:311–3.
Technol Conf, July 26–30, 2011, p. 355–358. DOI: 10.1109/ https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2014.4199.
CSQRWC.2011.6036957. [28] Zhao L, Liu F, Shen X, Jing G, Cai Y, Li Y. A high-pass antenna interference
[13] Haraz O, Elboushi A, Saleh AA, Sebak AR. Dense dielectric patch array antenna cancellation chip for mutual coupling reduction of antennas in contiguous
with improved radiation characteristics using EBG ground structure and frequency bands. IEEE Access 2018;6:38097–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/
dielectric superstrate for future 5G cellular networks. IEEE Access access.2018.2853709.
2014;2:909–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2352679. [29] Haraz OM, Ashraf M, Alshebeili S. Single-band PIFA MIMO antenna system
[14] Ashraf N, Haraz O, Ashraf MA, Elboushi A. 28/38-GHz dual-band millimeter design for future 5G wireless communication applications. Proc IEEE 11th Int
wave SIW array antenna with EBG structures for 5G applications. In: Proc Int Conf Wirel Mobile Comp Net Comm (WiMob) 2015:608–12. https://doi.org/
Conf Info Comm Technol Res (ICTRC), May 2015, p. 5–8. DOI: 10.1109/ 10.1109/WiMOB.2015.7348018.
ICTRC.2015.7156407. [30] Tu DTT, Thang NG, Ngoc NT, Phuong NTB, Yem VV. 28/38 GHz dual-band
[15] Haraz O, Ali MM, Elboushi A, Sebak AR. Four-element dual-band printed slot MIMO antenna with low mutual coupling using novel round patch EBG cell for
antenna array for the future 5G mobile communication networks. In: Proc IEEE 5G applications. Proc Int Conf Advanced Technol Comm (ATC), QuyNhon
Int Symp Antennas Propag & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, July 2017:64–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATC.2017.8167644.
2015, p. 1–2. DOI: 10.1109/APS.2015.7304386. [31] Wani Z, Abegaonkar MP, Koul SK. A 28-GHz antenna for 5G MIMO
[16] Alreshaid AT, Hammi O, Sharawi MS. Sarabandi K. A compact millimeter-wave applications. Prog Electromag Res Lett 2018;78:73–9. https://doi.org/
slot antenna array for 5G standards. Proc IEEE 4th Asia-Pacific Conf Antennas 10.2528/PIERL18070303.
Propag 2015:84–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/APCAP.2015.7374281. [32] Wang F, Duan Z, Li Q, Wei Y, Gong Y. Compact wideband MIMO antenna for 5G
[17] Orakwue SI, Ngah R, Rahman TA, Al-Khafaji HMR. A steerable 28 GHz array communication. In: Proc IEEE Int Symp Antennas Propag & USNC/URSI
antenna using branch line coupler. In: 1st Int Conf Telematics and Future National Radio Science Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–14 July 2017, p. 939–
Generation Net, 2015, p. 76–78. DOI: 10.1109/TAFGEN.2015.7289579. 940. DOI: 10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2017.8072512.
[18] Park SJ, Shin DH, Park SO. Low side-lobe substrate-integrated-waveguide [33] Sharawi MS, Podilchak SK, Hussain MT, Antar YMM. Dielectric resonator based
antenna array using broadband unequal feeding network for mm wave MIMO antenna system enabling millimeter-wave mobile devices. IET Microw
handset device. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 2015;64:923–32. https://doi. Antennas Propag 2017;11:287–93. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-
org/10.1109/TAP.2015.2513075. map.2016.0457.
[19] Alreshaid AT, Sharawi MS, Podilchak S, Saraband K. Compact millimeter-wave [34] Chen HD. Broadband CPW-fed square slot antennas with a widened tuning
switched-beam antenna arrays for short range communications. Microw Opt stub. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 2003;51:257–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/
Technol Lett 2016;58:1917–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.29940. TAP.2003.814747.
[20] Kakkar A, Nirdosh, Tripathy MR, Singh AK. Design and analysis of slotted [35] Technical Data sheet, 1.85mm End Launch Connector (67 GHz, 1892-04A-6),
antenna array for 5G application. In: Proc Prog Electromag Res Symp Southwest Microwave, Inc. [online] Available: <http://
Singapore, November 19–22, 2017, p. 459–463. DOI: 10.1109/PIERS- mpd.southwestmicrowave.com/products/product.php?need=endLaunch&
FALL.2017.8293182. item=54>.
[21] Mahmoud KR, Montaser AM. Optimised 4 4 millimetre-wave antenna array [36] Vaughan RG, Andersen JB. Antenna diversity in mobile communications. IEEE
with DGS using hybrid ECFO-NM algorithm for 5G mobile networks. IET Trans Veh Technol 1987;36:149–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-
Microw Antennas Propag 2017;11:1516–23. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet- VT.1987.24115.
map.2016.0959. [37] Rosengren K, Kildal PS. Radiation efficiency, correlation, diversity gain and
[22] Ta SX, Choo H, Park I. Broadband printed-dipole antenna and its arrays for 5G capacity of a six-monopole antenna array for a MIMO system: Theory,
applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 2017;16:2183–6. https://doi. simulation and measurement in reverberation chamber. IEEE Proc Microw
org/10.1109/LAWP.2017.2703850. Antennas Propag 2005;152:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-map:20045031.