0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views15 pages

FORERO-OrTIZ ET AL 2020 Climate Change Implications For Water Availability

Uploaded by

ruvillar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views15 pages

FORERO-OrTIZ ET AL 2020 Climate Change Implications For Water Availability

Uploaded by

ruvillar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Article

Climate Change Implications for Water Availability:


A Case Study of Barcelona City
Edwar Forero‐Ortiz 1,2,*, Eduardo Martínez‐Gomariz 1,2 and Robert Monjo 3
1 Cetaqua, Water Technology Centre. Carretera d’Esplugues, 75, Cornellà de Llobregat, 08940 Barcelona, Spain
2 FLUMEN Research Institute, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Calle del Gran Capità, 6,
08034 Barcelona, Spain; eduardo.martinez‐[email protected]
3 FIC‐ Climate Research Foundation, 28013 Madrid, Spain; [email protected]

* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33‐783‐53‐72‐22

Received: 30 January 2020; Accepted: 26 February 2020; Published: 27 February 2020

Abstract: Barcelona city has a strong dependence on the Ter and Llobregat reservoir system to
provide drinking water. One main concern for the next century is a potential water scarcity triggered
by a severe and persistent rainfall shortage. This is one of the climate‐driven impacts studied within
the EU funded project RESCCUE. To evaluate potential drought scenarios, the Hydrologiska Byråns
Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) hydrological model reproduces the water contributions by month
that have reached the reservoirs, regarding the accumulated rainfall over each sub‐basin,
representing the available historical‐observed water levels. For future scenarios, we adjusted the
input data set using climate projections of rainfall time series data of the project RESCCUE. Local
outputs from 9 different climate models were applied to simulate river basins’ responses to
reservoirs’ incoming water volume. Analyzing these results, we obtained average trends of the
models for each scenario, hypothetical extreme values, and quantification for changes in water
availability. Future water availability scenarios for Barcelona central water sources showed a mean
decrease close to 11% in comparison with the period 1971–2015, considering the representative
concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) climate change scenario in the year 2100. This research forecasts
a slight downward trend in water availability from rainfall contributions from the mid‐21st century.
This planned future behavior does not mean that the annual water contributions are getting lower
than the current ones, but rather, identifies an escalation in the frequency of drought cycles.

Keywords: drought; water scarcity; water availability; climate change; hydrological modeling;
resilience

1. Introduction
Climate change estimates to affect all spheres of human activity in the natural environment,
including water resources. Defined as a shortage in rainfall over an extended period, a season or
more, drought affects both human activities and the environmental balance [1]. A significant
proportion of the human population is currently experiencing restrictions on access to drinking water
due to drought events, a vulnerable component of the natural and social action chains [2].
Increases in drought events’ frequency and severity are forecast under the impact of climate
change [3], examples include events in China (1991–1996), East Africa (2010–2011), United States of
America (2011–2012), Australia (2013–2016), and Catalonia, Spain (2006–2008) [4]. Water resource
availability shortage threatens urban areas due to factors such as rapid urbanization, increased water
use, lack of climate change adaptation policies, and repeated drought events [5]; drought has
historically affected 35% of the population hit by natural hazards [1].
Globally, the drinking water requirement for cities has increased due to rapid population growth
in cities, pollution of water sources, stress on groundwater sources, and the impact of extreme

Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779; doi:10.3390/su12051779 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability


Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 2 of 15

weather conditions [5]. Researchers concur that drought events will be intense due to lower rainfall
and higher evapotranspiration in some areas of Europe, above all impacting Spain [6,7]. Therefore,
understanding the complexity of drought events is essential for the city of Barcelona in facing the
next century, associated with rainfall shortage. However, drought is a slow process of shortage
accumulation, and the sharpness of drought episodes is not only related to current rainfall, but much
more related to the cumulative impact of previous hydrological balances.
One of the criteria for proper reservoir management as part of a water supply system is the
rigorous design and implementation of the guidelines of reservoir operation along with
environmental planning, allowing management to have the tools to cope with growing climate
change influence on water scarcity [8]. Reservoir operation is “a large‐scale multi‐objective
optimization problem” [9]. Therefore, this paper contributes to the understanding of the hydrological
process in the Barcelona water supply reservoir system under climate change influence, as one of the
factors involved in this process.
Barcelona and its metropolitan area dependent on the Ter and Llobregat reservoir system to
provide the water demand throughout the year. According to the Catalonian river basin management
plan [10], a document from Catalan Water Agency (ACA, Catalonian water resources administrator),
Barcelona uses mainly Llobregat river water (38%), and Ter river water (55%), while for the remaining
7%–8% it employs groundwater. Both basins have their higher part controlled by reservoirs which
modulate the required water resources. Barcelona is far from these reservoirs, but the drought
situation depends on their stored water volumes.
When these volumes are lower than threshold levels (less than 30% of water stocks in the
reservoirs) as set by the Drought Plan from the ACA [11], a drought contingency triggers concerning
water use restrictions for activities such as irrigation, leisure, industrial purposes, etc., as happened
in 2007 and 2008. Beyond environmental and social impacts generated by Barcelona 2006 and 2008
extreme drought events, a study estimated drought impacts valued at 1605 million euros, half a point
of Catalonia’s GDP [12].
Catalonian droughts’ knowledge is most of all based on drought events’ variability studies,
either historically avoiding any future SPI (standardized precipitation index) and SPEI (standardized
precipitation–evaporation index) indicators projection [13], or assessing climate change effects
without considering the representative concentration pathways (RCPs) presented in the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fifth assessment report [14].
Gallart et al. [15] estimated trends for the rivers’ discharge in the Ter–Llobregat system analyzing
their historical records. However, this approach did not attempt to consider the contextual factors
that influence the availability of water resources in the future for the Ter Llobregat system. The
research would have been relevant if a forecast had been considered, introducing a future water
resources scenario.
The Drought Plan (Alert and eventual drought exceptional action plan) developed by the
Catalonian government (Generalitat de Catalunya) and the ACA in 2016, proposes a Ter–Llobregat
water resources evolution. This research applied the SIMGES hydrological model with the
multivariate periodic autoregressive (MPAR) stochastic model, based on 68 years of historical
monthly flow contribution contributions series and comparing them with the generated synthetic
series for a 500‐year return period.
Likewise, a synthetic series was designed to analyze critical episodes of drought and estimating
probabilities of occurrence by extrapolating historical climatic conditions [11]. Therefore, this study
focused on understanding how climate change plays a role in Barcelonaʹs drought events as one of
the significant nature‐based concerns for the next century [10,16,17].
Our research aim is broadening future drought events’ knowledge, considering climate change
impacts. We defined the design and implementation of a model for water amounts reservoir balance
at a month scale, analyzing basins rainfall. This paper, as a first of its two‐fold aim, represents
observed reservoir water levels implementing the HBV (Hydrologiska Byråns
Vattenbalansavdelning) hydrological model and studied the application and validation of the
SIMGES model and the HBV model as appropriate tools to forecast drought frequency for Barcelona’s
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 3 of 15

case. After the historical model calibration and validation process, we obtained rainfall projections
using nine Earth system models (ESM) and two representative concentration pathways’ (RCP)
scenarios—RCP4.5 and RCP8.5—belonging to the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
(CMIP5), provided by the Spanish Climate Research Foundation (FIC, accordingly to the Spanish
acronym).
Second, we integrated these rainfall outputs within the hydrological model to simulate reservoir
volumes as watershed responses, developing 30 different storage patterns. Outcomes of the models
were analyzed to get average trends and extreme values for each scenario to estimate a single water
availability trend for both reservoirs, to understand and analyze the water resource availability in
Barcelona in the near future under different climate change situations. Our study outcomes provide
additional support to plan water utility improvements, to evaluate extreme case scenarios, and to
assess hazards related to water scarcity in further research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hydrological Model Background: Description and Setup


Drought, under a hydrological viewpoint, as usual, indicates below‐normal levels of flow from
lakes, streams, and reservoirs or groundwater with generally accepted indicators, such as the
standardized runoff index (SRI), the surface water supply index (SWSI), the groundwater resources
index (GRI), among others [4]. Precipitation patterns and changes in the precipitation–runoff
relationship as essential variables to define drought which allows the assessment and simplification
of climate change impact on urban water availability [3].
The study used precipitation pattern analysis to gain insight into rainfall influence over
reservoirs’ water availability. Simulations of the water volume at each reservoir applied HBV, an
integrated hydrological modeling system, developed at the Swedish Meteorological Hydrological
Institute. The model relies on three different reservoir modules: one that simulates the behavior of
the soil; the second, the upper reservoir and, finally, the lower reservoir that accounts for the
groundwater base flow [18].
Some researchers have highlighted [19,20] how the HBV model is accurate, reproducing present
and future water processes in the Llobregat basin. Thus, the HBV model is suitable to simulate the
reservoirs’ contributions over the Llobregat and Ter’s basin. The model requires the physical
properties of the basin as well as the climatic inputs, including precipitation, temperature, and
potential evapotranspiration. The time scale for the input data was day‐to‐day. Detailed discussion
on the hydrological modelʹs internal functioning falls outside the scope of this paper.
Using the Thornthwaite formula (ETPraw) gave us an estimation of potential evapotranspiration.
Then, we applied a correction to get a better adjustment to the results obtained according to two
parameters, using the Penman evapotranspiration as a reference. The evapotranspiration calibration
process with two meteorological stations data in Llobregat and Ter basins computed Penman
evapotranspiration (ETP) equation according to data availability.

2.2. Model Calibration, Validation, and Sensitivity Analysis


Table 1 describes the seven calibrated parameters applied to characterize each rainfall event
introduced into the model sub‐basin. These are all conceptual parameters, not easy to estimate from
basin physical properties. The choice of the seven calibration parameters followed a preliminary data
analysis, checking their values’ availability and validity for a monthly time‐step; in addition,
according to local conditions, snow‐related parameters were discarded.

Table 1. The calibrated Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) model parameters for the
Llobregat and Ter river basins.

HBV Model Parameter Description {Unit}


β A shape coefficient that determines the precipitation contribution to the runoff
FC Field capacity {mm}
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 4 of 15

HBV Model Parameter Description {Unit}


LP Limit above Actual Evapotranspiration (AET) reaches ETP
K1 Recession coefficient
K2 Recession coefficient
UZL Threshold parameter {mm}
Perc Percolation ratio

A Montecarlo simulation was conducted examining 10,000 combinations where there was an
available gauge station to calibrate the parameters at each basin, setting the established objective
function as accurately as possible (Nash‐coefficient, Equation 1), at a daily timescale if conceivable,
in addition, relating with monthly volumes used as a reference, based on the obtained hydrographs
when the information was available. Validation of water volume contribution data used ACA’s water
contribution estimations from the Aquatool SIMGES module developed by IIAMA [21].

𝑁𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 1 , (1)

where 𝑄 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒, 𝑄 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑠.


Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency ranges from −∞ to 1. The closer to 1 the coefficient is, the more accurate the
model is. An efficiency equal to 0 means that the approximation is as good as the mean of the
observed data. Results are acceptable when positive values are higher than 0.2.

2.3. Framework for Assessing Future Water Resources Allocation


To define some potential situations, the representation of reservoir water contribution depends
on the rainfall of the sub‐basins over each dam. Outcomes include average trends of the models for
each scenario, hypothetical extreme values, and the quantification of a possible number of times that
reservoir systems could encounter warning events. Reservoir volumes relate to the ACA’s 1999–2018
historical data and since 2006 climate model forecasting. Therefore, the historical data range was
1999–2005 and projections cover 2006 to 2100. Rainfall time‐series projections from 9 distinct climate
models (see Section 3.2) were employed to simulate reservoir input volumes’ behavior. The outcomes
of these nine models were averaged to find a single trend for each system obtaining four trends, two
for each reservoir (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5).

3.A Case Study for Barcelona city

3.1. The Study Area


The Llobregat and Ter rivers and other small basins (defined as the Ter–Llobregat system)
supply the Barcelona metropolitan area with drinking water. Llobregat river provides about 38%,
and the Ter river supplies 55% of raw water for water drinking treatment plants for Barcelona [22,23].
The coupled basins’ total drainage area is 4957 km2, with a surface elevation variation from almost
2500 m (pre‐Pyrenean mountain range) to the sea level, as Figure 1 shows.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 5 of 15

Figure 1. Location of the involved reservoirs, rivers, catchments, and morphology of the study area.

A seasonal rainfall variability phenomenon in the two river basins led to water demand‐supply
fluctuations. Despite this infrastructure, water resource management is complex and involves
groundwater extraction from aquifers and seawater desalination in extraordinary drought events
[24].
Some key aspects of each sub‐basin over the Llobregat and Ter river basins (see Figure 2) can be
listed as follows:
 La Baells: Llobregat river basin divides into four sub‐basins. Those contained in Guardiola de
Berguedà zone include aquifers 112 and 115, with an area of low permeability. This sub‐basin
catches the flow from the upstream sub‐basins and adds its contribution.
 La Llosa del Cavall: Four different sub‐basins constitute this Llobregat river basin. La Coma i La
Pedra y La Llosa del Cavall represent a part of aquifer 116, with two additional sub‐basins of
low permeability downstream.
 Sant Ponç: Two sub‐basins define the basin part of the Llobregat river. In this case, there is no
aquifer over the area.
 Sau: This Ter river basin is divided into six different areas. Those located within the region up
to the Ripoll gauge station correspond to the upper aquifers 110 and 115, which represent 75%
of the total contribution reaching the Sau reservoir. Sub‐basins’ simulation was with the same
properties but with different precipitation and temperature data.
 Susqueda: It considers one sub‐basin of Ter river catchment. Besides, it employs a setting of
aquifer 203 parameters for month‐by‐month water contributions.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 6 of 15


(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Figure 2. (a) Division of sub‐basins for the reservoir system on the Ter river; (b) Aquifers in the Ter
river basin; (c) Division of sub‐basins for the reservoir system on the Llobregat river; (d) Aquifers in
the Llobregat river basin. The red dots indicate the placement of the meteorological stations in the Ter
and Llobregat basins. The large red circles with black edge indicate gauging stations that are named
as the sub‐basin where they are located.

3.2. Data
Research data was from three main sources. Rainfall and temperature records were from the
Spanish Meteorological State Agency (AEMET), considering all available stations. Forty‐four weather
stations provide Ter basin 1980–2015 rainfall records, and eleven weather stations contribute
Llobregat basin records. Each zone drawn with the same color represents an area with equal rainfall
estimation by the Thiessen polygon method (Figure 2).
The calibration of the HBV model discharge results uses data from stream gauging stations of
the ACA managed upper basins. As it is not possible to use gauging stations data in basin lower
zones, we calibrated the ACA hydrological simulated data with the historical calibrated upper zone
discharge data and compared the computed values against the HBV model dataset.
In addition to the observed data, downscaled climate‐model outputs were collected from the
Climate Research Foundation database [25], as shown in Table 2. These local time series are outputs
from a statistical downscaling method of Ribalaygua et al. [26] based on analog stratification and
transfer functions. Data include local simulations of ERA‐Interim reanalysis and nine CMIP5 models
under both historical experiments (1951–2005) and future projections (2006–2100) under RCP4.5 and
RCP8.5.

Table 2. Available Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) climate models with outputs at
a daily timescale. The table shows the responsible institution, climate model version, references, and
spatial resolution for the atmospheric general circulation model (GCM).

CMIP5 Resolution
Institution Source
Model (Lon × Lat)
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 7 of 15

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation


ACCESS1‐0 [27] 1.87°×1.25°
(CSIRO), Bureau of Meteorology (BOM)
Beijing Climate Center (BCC) BCC‐CSM1‐1 [28] 2.8°×2.8°
Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CC‐CMA) CanESM2 [29] 2.8°×2.8°
National Center for Meteorological Research, Météo‐France and
CNRM‐CM5 [30] 1.4°×1.4°
CNRS laboratory (CNRM‐CERFACS)
GFDL‐
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) [31] 2°×2.5°
ESM2M
Japan Agency for Marine‐Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC),
MIROC‐
Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, the University of Tokyo [32] 1.4°×1.4°
ESM‐CHEM
(AORI), Japan National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES)
MPI‐ESM‐
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI‐M) [33] 1.8°×1.8°
MR
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency
MRI‐CGCM3 [34] 1.2°×1.2°
(MRI)
Norwegian Climate Centre (NCC) NorESM1‐M [35,36] 2.5°×1.9°

4. Results

4.1. Evapotranspiration Calibration


The calibration process worked with two temperature stations’ data (0085A for Llobregat basin
and 0353 for Ter basin, see Figure 2), where the required data for computing Penman ETP was
available. Over the Llobregat’s temperature stations, we applied a correction with the 0085A station
dataset. Likewise, for Ter’s upper‐temperature stations. Correction obtained with 0353 station dataset
was applied at the downstream Ter’s sub‐basins due to its geographic location. Figure 3 shows the
results at both stations. The left‐hand side graph displays the considered monthly
evapotranspiration, and the right‐hand side one, its cumulative distribution.
To measure the efficiency of the correction, we computed the mean square error (MSE) for the
Thornthwaite ETP, raw and corrected. Water volume contributions were checked for each season,
and so, the ETP correction may change somewhat from one season to another.
160
1
Cumulative distribution

140
120 0.8
ETP [mm]

100
0.6
80
60 0.4 ETP raw
40 0.2 ETP cor
20 Penman
0 0
1996 1998 2000 2003 2005 2008 2010 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year ETP [mm]

(a) (b)
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 8 of 15

180
1

Cumulative distribution
160
140 0.8
120
ETP [mm]

100 0.6
80
0.4 ETP raw
60
40 0.2 ETP cor
20 Penman
0 0
1996 1998 2000 2003 2005 2008 2010 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Year ETP [mm]

(c) (d)

Figure 3. (a) Potential evapotranspiration calibration: Monthly ETP and (b) distribution of daily ETP
at 0085A for the Llobregat basin; (c) Potential evapotranspiration calibration: Monthly ETP and (d)
distribution of daily ETP at 0353 for the Ter basin.

4.2. Calibration and Validation of Hydrological Parameters


Figure 4 presents the response hydrographs at the locations where stream gauging stations
provide records. These stations include EA078 in the la Baells sub‐basin, EA087 and EA021 in the La
Llosa del Cavall sub‐basin and EA033 in the Sau sub‐basin.
100 40
Q.obs 35 Q.obs
80 Q.sim Q.sim
30
Q [m3/s]

Q [m3/s]

60 25
20
40 15
20 10
5
0 0
1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000
Years Years
(a) (b)

Figure 4. Observed (obs) and computed (sim) response hydrograph: (a) La Baells station; (b) La Llosa
del Cavall station.

Figure 4a shows how response hydrograph performs a good base flows simulation but decreases
accuracy in peak flows simulation. Nevertheless, the Nash‐coefficient equal to 0.42 was enough to
reproduce the behavior of the A78 sub‐basin. Peak flows were undershot, but it was preferable to
underestimate these contributions as a safety factor, considering weather station scarcity in this area,
which directly influences the rainfall time series. Analyzing the response, the approximation was
precise enough to reproduce the behavior of this sub‐basin. In Figure 4b, the Nash coefficient in this
basin was 0.30, which returns a satisfactory outcome. The main differences were gathered from 1990,
when the available records had quality issues, as the frequency of the measurements increased to 4–
7 days.
In the rest of the basins, two verifications reviewed the results. We compared monthly
contributions for each season, and the water contributions were correlated applying a linear
regression of the HBV and SIMGES models. Evaluation through the R2 coefficient as shown in Figure
5 verifies whether the distribution is similar among HBV and SIMGES volumes. In addition, we
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 9 of 15

checked the Nash‐coefficient with each reservoir’s computed contributions for all seasons. Table 3
presents the calculated Nash‐coefficients.
80

HBV Contribution
R² = 0.8962
60

[hm3]
40

20

0
0 20 40 60 80
3
SIMGES Contribution [hm ]
(a) (b)

Figure 5. (a) La Baells monthly reservoir contribution during winter months, comparison of
Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) and SIMGES outputs; (b) Comparison analysis
of the two contributions. The black line corresponds to a simple linear regression.

Table 3. Nash‐coefficient for each reservoir at a monthly time scale, for each season and considering
the historical analyzed records (1980–2013).

Nash‐Coefficient Winter Spring Summer Autumn Total


La Baells 0.85 0.67 0.51 0.89 0.79
La Llosa del Cavall 0.72 0.60 0.44 0.22 0.49
Sant Ponç 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.62 0.33
Llobregat’s Contribution 0.85 0.64 0.55 0.87 0.79
Sau 0.82 0.81 0.75 0.69 0.77
Susqueda 0.59 0.31 0.32 0.41 0.42
Ter’s Contribution 0.85 0.83 0.77 0.73 0.80

Subsequently, the total contributions from 1980–2013 were analyzed to check if the total volume
of water available to serve the demand was the same, regarding the distribution by year at each
reservoir unit for the HBV, and the SIMGES model used as a reference, as Figure 6 illustrates.

1 140
Cumulative distribution

Reference [hm3/year]

0.8 120
100
0.6
80
0.4 60
40
0.2 Computed
20
Reference
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Contribution [hm3/year] Contribution [hm3/year]

(a) (b)

Figure 6. Complete Ter–Llobregat system: available water volumes comparison in years 1980–2013:
(a) Water contributions data distribution for HBV and SIMGES models. The closer the lines are, the
more similar they are. (b) To assess how similar they are, this shows the correlation between the two
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 10 of 15

distributions. As the values are distributed along the reference line (slope 1.00), their correspondence
is valid.

The outcomes from both models were similar. The main difference came from the distribution
over the year, in particular during summer months, when SIMGES contributions were critical. One
of the main reasons to explain this difference may come from the two time‐series input models.
Recognizing that both datasets are different, the results cannot be the same. Outcomes were similar,
ensuring the representation created with the HBV model achieved a reasonable resemblance with the
historical dataset.

4.3. Simulations under Future Rainfall Conditions


Reservoir volumes results were from historical data provided by ACA. Results of the projections
indicated that not all the climate models were adversely predictive: some of them forecasted rainfall
increase (volume), while others estimated a reduction. Figure 7 shows some models forecasting
severe drought situations in the RCP8.5 scenario, compared with the RCP4.5 scenario, which showed
water scarcity, according to a few models for Ter and Llobregat reservoirs. According to projections,
it is expected that in both systems for the RCP8.5 scenario, at least one drought episode is expected
with the 20‐years return period.
600

550

500
Water volume [hm3]

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

Years
MPI-ESM-MR GFDL-ESM2M MIROC-ESM_CHEM Nor-ESM1
BCC-CSM1-1 CanESM2 CNRM-CM5 MRI-CGCM2
Mean ACCESS 1-0 Linear (Mean)

(a)
600

550

500
Water volume [hm3]

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

Years
MPI-ESM-MR GFDL-ESM2M MIROC-ESM_CHEM Nor-ESM1
BCC-CSM1-1 CanESM2 CNRM-CM5 MRI-CGCM2
Mean ACCESS 1-0 Linear (Mean)

(b)
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 11 of 15

Figure 7. Results summary figure showing range and average water volume outcomes for every
representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenario, for the Llobregat and Ter joint system towards
the 21st century. The red‐spotted line provides a linear trend estimation. (a) Results for the RCP8.5
scenario, (b) Results for the RCP4.5 scenario.

Model trends and extreme values were plotted to represent the magnitude of future situations
and to consider all the possible climate model variables evolution during the 21st century. An
implication of the negative trend, as for the RCP8.5 in the reservoir system, is the possibility that a
long‐term alternative resource will be necessary to preserve reservoir equilibrium. Regression
analysis predicts the combined behavior of both systems as a joint water reservoir system. In
particular, the analysis of the joint system allows studying the link among the most challenging
climate change scenario (RCP8.5) and the predicted water resources availability and bypass any
analysis bias.
Figure 7 displays the intercorrelations of the nine performed models, providing a behavior
trend‐line of the reservoir system water volume. An average trend of these model outputs forecasts
an 11.1% decrease in the system water availability, applying the RCP8.5 scenario for the year 2100.
Such water availability variations will have city‐scale consequences for social‐economic conditions
and ecosystems.

5. Discussion
Turning now to the assessment on the applicability of the SIMGES and HBV models as
appropriate tools to forecast drought frequency, some factors play a role in determining why the
HBV model underestimated the water contribution, as shown in Figure 4, for the first calibration and
validation step. The main reason that can be argued to explain this may come from the precipitation
records. At high areas, such as this one, convective storms may occur over a localized area not
covered by any meteorological station. In any case, the HBV contributions were on the security side.
SIMGES model contributions apply in ACA Water Management Plan were closer to HBV computed
values. Thus, the response of the HBV model is reasonable.
Analyzing Table 3 outcomes for each season, it is observed how the winter and autumn volume
contributions present the best correlation to the SIMGES model. Throughout the spring and summer
periods, the dispersion of the results was high. However, the Nash‐coefficients were satisfactory for
the most significant reservoirs: La Baells, Sau, and Susqueda. La Llosa del Cavall and Sant Ponç
reservoirs could not have been simulating with the same precision, notwithstanding, its contribution
to the total water reserves was 13% and 4%. Hence, their contribution to the entire system was small
in comparison with the other dams.
On the question of understanding and analyzing the water resource availability in Barcelona in
the future under different climate change situations, this study found that the water availability
would drop in this 21st century for the reservoir system. By 2019–2050, the models average predicts a
9% decrease in surface water volume availability over the reservoir system. However, by 2019–2100,
due to precipitation reduction and warming‐enhanced evaporation, Climate Change effects, the
models average predicts an 11% decrease with a remarkably high consensus among analyzed models
for the RCP8.5 scenario, as shown in Figure 7.
The results obtained herein are consistent with Barcelona regional and Barcelona city council
results [10], estimating in the year 2050, a 12% surface water resources decrease. Table 4 compares
the summary statistics for the water resources availability forecast, comparing other studies for the
reservoir system.

Table 4. Comparison of the summary statistics for the forecast of the water resources’ availability for
the Ter and Llobregat reservoir system.

Mean Expected Mean Expected


Study
Reduction by 2050 Reduction by 2100
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 12 of 15

Climate change impacts study in Barcelona—water


12% No Data
cycle [10]
RESCCUE Project 9% 11%
Water and climate change. Diagnosis of the 7%–15% according to
No Data
impacts predicted in Catalonia [17,37] diverse scenarios

These results are consonant with related studies [17], finding that according to valid data control
models and detailing low‐heterogeneity results, Llobregat river discharges will decrease, in a 2%
scale for years 2070–2100.
Our approach in this paper explored the water availability of the principal sources providing
about 92% of contemporary water demand. Due to practical constraints, a full discussion of
adaptation measures coping with water availability shortage lies beyond the scope of this study.
Catalonian Drought Plan documents designate some current adaptation measures [11,37]. They relate
an increase in alternative water sources and a decrease in drinking water consumption, such as the
planning and implementation of water reclamation and reuse, desalination as a technical option to
increase the drinking water availability, to increase groundwater extraction, and to decrease
consumption (stronger for agriculture, breeding, and recreative uses).
However, these solutions have significant technical, legal, political, and economic hurdles. In
the case of the existing desalination plant, its maximum potential for water production is 60
Hm3/year, an amount that could meet the current and future water shortages set in this study,
nevertheless, the average unit cost of desalinated water production (€ 0.58/m3) cost four times more
than the cost of potable water production in the drinking water treatment plant (€ 0.14/m3) [24,38].

6. Conclusions
Drought model outcomes cannot predict future conditions for a fact. Still, these results will aid
researchers and stakeholders to have an idea concerning the order of magnitude of eventual future
drought episodes. The associated uncertainty in climate model variables does not allow them to be
used to define a single future path, even though the results can be valuable to design future system
improvements and investments.
Overall, these results highlight that under the RCP8.5 scenario, cyclic drought episodes are
expected to occur every twenty years with more than one year of drought state persistency. Further
research can evaluate climate change impacts, updating models forecast every 5/10 years, to estimate
a most reliable behavior forecasting. For the water supply side, renewable water resources are
influenced by anthropogenic factors, precipitation, temperature, and other climate variables
fluctuations, yet, we dismiss these variations in this study scope.
This study combined hydrological models and the latest greenhouse gas concentration scenarios
to synthesize the proposed behavior of water sources in Barcelona. We showed that climate change
is likely to affect local and regional water scarcity modestly. Moreover, this research forecasts a water‐
availability slightly downward trend from the middle of the 21st century. This proposed behavior
does not mean that the annual water contributions are ever lower than the current ones. We identified
an increase in drought cycle frequency, following a reduction in the average water availability, even
in years of hydrological ascent.
By contrast, these reductions lead to a trend (i.e., the one conditioning the water supply system
capacity) alleviated by a constant alternative source with the same magnitude and adding specific
support when extreme events occur. With regard to the research methods, some limitations need to
be acknowledged. After defining how the expected water availability decreases in the system, it is
necessary to consider that these analyses do not consider the future growth of water demand or any
new planned infrastructure. Likewise, this study does not consider variations in land‐use future
states. The reservoir watershed has undergone a revegetalization process since 1997, as assorted
researches carried out in Catalonia indicates a farmland abandonment process and the resulting
increase in forest mass [39]; as a result, we consider these land‐use conditions will remain stable in
the future.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 13 of 15

Further research is expected to have a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying


Barcelona reservoirs’ management yielding an effective and sustainable water supply scheme, in
conjunction with other hydrological involved processes. Adaptation measures studies, which take
these variables into account, will need to be undertaken.
Author Contributions: E. F. O.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data
curation, Writing—original draft preparation. E. M. G.: Conceptualization, Validation, Resources, Writing—
review and editing; Supervision, Project administration. R. M.: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Data
curation, Resources.

Funding: This research was funded by the RESCCUE project, which is sponsored by the European Union’s
Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 700174, whose support is gratefully
recognized.

Acknowledgments: The contents of this research are a part of the findings of the project RESCCUE, which has
obtained funding from the EU H2020 (grant agreement n. 700174). Re‐use of the knowledge enclosed in this
paper for commercial and/or non‐commercial purposes is allowed and free of charge, on the requirements of
compliance by the re‐user of the research, not distortion of the original meaning or information of this research
and the non‐liability of the project RESCCUE partners for any consequence stemming from the re‐use. The
project RESCCUE partners do not accept any liability for the errors, consequences, or omissions herein
contained.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the
study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to
publish the results.

References
1. Chen, L.; Guo, S. Copulas and its Application in Hydrology and Water Resources; Springer: Singapore,2019;
ISBN 9789811305733.
2. Grillakis, M.G. Increase in severe and extreme soil moisture droughts for Europe under climate change.
Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 660, 1245–1255.
3. Tian, W.; Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Bai, P. Investigation and simulations of changes in the relationship of
precipitation‐runoff in drought years. J. Hydrol. 2018, 565, 95–105.
4. Hao, Z.; Hao, F.; Singh, V.P.; Sun, A.Y.; Xia, Y. Probabilistic prediction of hydrologic drought using a
conditional probability approach based on the meta‐Gaussian model. J. Hydrol. 2016, 542, 772–780.
5. Singh, S.; Sharma, V.K. Urban Droughts in India: Case Study of Delhi; Springer: Singapore, 2019; ISBN
9789811089466.
6. Roudier, P.; Andersson, J.C.M.; Donnelly, C.; Feyen, L.; Greuell, W.; Ludwig, F. Projections of future floods
and hydrological droughts in Europe under a +2°C global warming. Clim. Change 2016, 135, 341–355.
7. Koutroulis, A.G.; Papadimitriou, L.V.; Grillakis, M.G.; Tsanis, I.K.; Wyser, K.; Betts, R.A. Freshwater
vulnerability under high end climate change. A pan‐European assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 613–
614, 271–286.
8. Iglesias, A. de; Garrote, L.; Cancelliere, A.; Cubillo, F.; Wilhite, D. Coping with Drought Risk in Agriculture
and Water Supply Systems Drought Management and Policy Development in the Mediterranean; Springer:
Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2009; ISBN 9781402090448.
9. Anand, J.; Gosain, A.K.; Khosa, R. Optimisation of multipurpose reservoir operation by coupling soil and
water assessment tool (SWAT) and genetic algorithm for optimal operating policy (case study: Ganga River
Basin). Sustainability 2018, 10, 1660.
10. Barcelona Regional; Ajuntament de Barcelona Cicle de L’Aigua ‐ Estudi dels Impactes del Camvi Climàtic
a Barcelona Available online: http://www3.amb.cat/repositori/PSAMB/Canvi_clima.pdf (accessed on 19
November 2020).
11. Generalitat de Catalunya; Agència Catalana de L’Aigua; Molist, J. Pla especial d’actuació en situació
d’alerta i eventual sequera. Informe de sostenabilitat ambiental Available online:
http://aca.gencat.cat/web/.content/30_Plans_i_programes/30_Pla_sequera/bloc1/04_pes_Isa_ca.pdf
(accessed on 7 November 2019).
12. Martin‐Ortega, J.; González‐Eguino, M.; Markandya, A. The costs of drought: The 2007/2008 case of
Barcelona. Water Policy 2012, 14, 539–560.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 14 of 15

13. Coll, J.R.; Aguilar, E.; Prohom, M.; Sigró, J. Variabilidad y tendencias a largo plazo de las sequías en
Barcelona (1787‐2014). Cuad. Investig. Geogr. 2016, 42, 29–48.
14. Pascual, D.; Pla, E.; Lopez‐Bustins, J.A.; Retana, J.; Terradas, J. Impacts du changement climatique sur les
ressources en eau dans le bassin méditerranéen : Une étude de cas en Catalogne, Espagne. Hydrol. Sci. J.
2015, 60, 2132–2147.
15. Gallart, F.; Delgado, J.; Beatson, S.J.V.; Posner, H.; Llorens, P.; Marcé, R. Analysing the effect of global
change on the historical trends of water resources in the headwaters of the Llobregat and Ter river basins
(Catalonia, Spain). Phys. Chem. Earth 2011, 36, 655–661.
16. Barcelona Regional; Ajuntament de Barcelona Estratègia Delta del Llobregat Available online:
https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/economiatreball/sites/default/files/documents/Memoria ESTRATEGIA
DELTA_A4_completa.pdf (accessed on 18 September 2019).
17. Agència Catalana de l’Aigua Aigua i Canvi Cimàtic. Diagnosi dels Impactes Previstos a Catalunya
Available online: http://www.gencat.cat/mediamb/publicacions/monografies/aigua_canvi_climatic.pdf
(accessed on 25 September 2019).
18. Seibert, J.; Vis, M.J.P. Teaching hydrological modeling with a user‐friendly catchment‐runoff‐model
software package. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16, 3315–3325.
19. Versini, P.A.; Pouget, L.; McEnnis, S.; Custodio, E.; Escaler, I. Climate change impact on water resources
availability: Case study of the Llobregat River basin (Spain). Hydrol. Sci. J. 2016, 61, 2496–2508.
20. Velasco, M.; Versini, P.A.; Cabello, A.; Barrera‐Escoda, A. Assessment of flash floods taking into account
climate change scenarios in the Llobregat River basin. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 13, 3145–3156.
21. Andreu, J.; Solera, A. Methodology for the analysis of drought mitigation measures in water resources
systems. Drought Manag. Plan. Water Resour. 2006, 133–168.
22. Céspedes, R.; Lacorte, S.; Ginebreda, A.; Barceló, D. Chemical monitoring and occurrence of alkylphenols,
alkylphenol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxylates, phthalates and benzothiazoles in sewage treatment plants
and receiving waters along the ter River basin (Catalonia, N.E. Spain). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2006, 385, 992–
1000.
23. Honey‐Rosés, J.; Acuña, V.; Bardina, M.; Brozović, N.; Marcé, R.; Munné, A.; Sabater, S.; Termes, M.; Valero,
F.; Vega, À.; et al. Examining the demand for ecosystem services: The value of stream restoration for
drinking water treatment managers in the Llobregat river, Spain. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 90, 196–205.
24. Pouget, L.; Escaler, I.; Guiu, R.; Mc Ennis, S.; Versini, P.A. Global Change adaptation in water resources
management: The Water Change project. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 440, 186–193.
25. Climate Research Foundation (FIC) Downscaled climate model outputs of the RESCCUE project Available
online: https://www.ficlima.org/intercambio/indexed/RESCCUE/ (accessed on Nov 19, 2020).
26. Ribalaygua, J.; Torres, L.; Portoles, J.; Monjo, R.; Gaitan, E.; Pino, M. Description and validation of a two‐
step analogue/regression downscaling method. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2013, 114, 253–269.
27. Bi, D.; Dix, M.; Marsland, S.J.; O’Farrell, S.; Rashid, H.; Uotila, P.; Hirst, A.C.; Kowalczyk, E.; Golebiewski,
M.; Sullivan, A.; et al. The ACCESS coupled model: Description, control climate and evaluation. Aust.
Meteorol. Ocean. J 2013, 63, 41–64.
28. Xiao‐Ge, X.; Tong‐Wen, W.; Jie, Z. Introduction of CMIP5 Experiments Carried out with the Climate System
Models of Beijing Climate Center. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2013, 4, 41–49.
29. Chylek, P.; Li, J.; Dubey, M.K.; Wang, M.; Lesins, G. Observed and model simulated 20th century Arctic
temperature variability: Canadian Earth System Model CanESM2. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2011, 11,
22893–22907.
30. Voldoire, A.; Sanchez‐Gomez, E.; y Mélia, D.; Decharme, B.; Cassou, C.; Sénési, S.; Valcke, S.; Beau, I.; Alias,
A.; Chevallier, M.; et al. The CNRM‐CM5.1 global climate model: Description and basic evaluation. Clim.
Dyn. 2013, 40, 2091–2121.
31. Dunne, J. GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate‐Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical
Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics. J. Clim. 2012, 25, 6646–6665.
32. Watanabe, S.; Hajima, T.; Sudo, K.; Nagashima, T.; Takemura, T.; Okajima, H.; Nozawa, T.; Kawase, H.;
Abe, M.; Yokohata, T.; et al. MIROC‐ESM 2010: Model description and basic results of CMIP5‐20c3m
experiments. Geosci. Model Dev. 2011, 4, 845.
33. Marsland, S.J.; Haak, H.; Jungclaus, J.H.; Latif, M.; Röske, F. The Max‐Planck‐Institute global ocean/sea ice
model with orthogonal curvilinear coordinates. Ocean Model. 2003, 5, 91–127.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1779 15 of 15

34. Yukimoto, S.; Yoshimura, H.; Hosaka, M.; Sakami, T.; Tsujino, H.; Hirabara, M.; Tanaka, T.; Deushi, M.;
Obata, A.; Nakano, H.; et al. Meteorological Research Institute‐Earth System Model Version 1 (MRI‐ESM1)
— Model Description —. Tech. Reports Meteorol. Res. Inst. 2011, 64, 1–96.
35. Bentsen, M.; Bethke, I.; Debernard, J.B.; Iversen, T.; Kirkevåg, A.; Seland, Ø.; Drange, H.; Roelandt, C.;
Seierstad, I.A.; Hoose, C.; et al. The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1‐M – Part 1: Description and
basic evaluation of the physical climate. Geosci. Model Dev. 2013, 6, 687–720.
36. Iversen, T.; Bentsen, M.; Bethke, I.; Debernard, J.; Kirkevåg, A.; Seland, Ø.; Drange, H.; Kristjansson, J.;
Medhaug, I.; Sand, M.; et al. The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1‐M ‐ Part 2: Climate response
and scenario projections. Geosci. Model Dev. 2013, 6, 389.
37. Agència catalana de l’aigua Pla especial d’actuació en situació d’alerta i eventual sequera Districte de conca
fluvial de Catalunya. 2009.
38. Cetaqua Identification of impacts and definition of adaptation measures. Available online: https://climate‐
adapt.eea.europa.eu/metadata/projects/medium‐and‐long‐term‐water‐resources‐modelling‐as‐a‐tool‐for‐
planning‐and‐global‐change‐adaptation‐application‐to‐the‐llobregat‐basin (accessed on12 October 2019).
39. Duran, X.; Picó, M.J.; Reales, L. El Cambio Climático en cataluña. Resumen ejecutivo del Tercer informe sobre el
cambio climático en Cataluña; Institut d’Estudis Catalans y Generalitat de Catalunya: Barcelona, 2017; ISBN
9788439396208.

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

You might also like