By; David Lester Straight, sui juris.

in care of / rural route 61037 Groff Road Bend, Oregon Zip exempt

To: Donald J. Trump As: The PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington, District of Columbia 20530

To: Mike Pompeo As: The SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES
2201 C Street NW. Washington, District of Columbia 20520

To: William Barr As: The ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washing-
ton, District of Columbia 20530-0001

To: Bev Clarno As: The Secretary of STATE OF OREGON

900 Court Street NE Salem, STATE OF OREGON 97310-0722

To: Alex Padilla As: The Secretary of STATE OF CALIFORNIA

1500 11th Street Sacramento, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 95814
Notice to Agent[s] is Notice to Principal[s], and Notice to Principal[s] is Notice

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH AND ASSERTORY OATH, REPUDI-

ATION AND REVOCATION OF CITIZENSHIP
When in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary
for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have
connected them with another, and to assume, among the
Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which
the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a de-
cent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they
should declare the causes which impel them to the Separa-
tion.
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are cre-
ated equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with cer-
tain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty,
and the Pursuit of Happiness--That to secure these Rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just

Page 1 of 32
Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever
any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends,
it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to in-
stitute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Prin-
ciples and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them
shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long estab-
lished should not be changed for light and transient Causes;
and accordingly all Experience hath shown, that Mankind are
more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to
right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are
accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpa-
tions, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design
to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it
is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide
new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the pa-
tient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the Ne-
cessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems
of Government. The History of the present (UNITED STATES
Corp) is a History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all
having in direct Object the Establishment of an absolute
Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be sub-
mitted to a candid World.

So here shall I, Stand...

This shall serve as notice to certify that I; A Living Soul, So called by my Father
and Mother since born, David-Lester; of the genealogy of Straight, ancient Streit,
was born 20th of April, 1963, in the Sovereign Republic California State. I
presently live upon the land of the Sovereign Republic Oregon State. I am not a
Resident, Employee or Citizen of the UNITED STATES Government (Corporation),
whose situs is Washington, the District of Columbia. My relationship to that Fed-
eral entity as far as jurisdiction is that of a non-resident alien to the Corporate

Page 2 of 32
United States Government. Also know as an American State National, or Lawful
Bloodline American.

I am a free and natural man, described by the Lord God in Genesis 2:7 as a Liv-
ing Soul, living under God’s law and his grace alone. I have assumed among the
Powers of the Earth, granted by the Lord God Almighty, the Separate and Equal
Station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God entitle me. Giving me do-
minion over all things. Therefore, in order to secure the Blessing of Liberty to my
posterity and myself, to re-acquire my Birthright as “one” of a member of the
Sovereign Social Body of “We the People,” I hereby Asseverate, Repudiate and
Revoke my Citizenship, if any ever existed, with the Legal fiction known as the
“UNITED STATES” Government (Corporation), USA Inc, and any and all sub-
sidiary corporations both known (STATE, COUNTY, CITY,) and unknown under
its control.

Maxim of Law:
No man can renounce the country in which he was born, nor ab-
jure the obligation of his allegiance. Co. LItt. 129. Sed vide Alle-
giance; Expatriation; Naturalization. (The Nation State Republic
is the country state in which you were born and it cannot be re-
nounced, by anybody or anyone)

I further rescind any and all feudal contracts with that Federal government, its
agencies and with the State of Oregon, STATE OF OREGON and its agencies, as
well as The State of California, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and its agencies. I rescind
the Social Security number, fraudulently issued upon me by the government well
before the age of 18, as such I was legally incompetent to enter into a legal con-
tract with the government. The government by obfuscation of facts and misinfor-
mation led my parents/me to believe at that time that I was required to secure a
Social Security Account number in order to gain employment, which is simply not
true. The government agent who obligated me to the Social Security System
knew or should have known that there existed serious liabilities to anyone who
accepted a Social Security Number. That Agent had a fiduciary responsibility to
inform my parents/me of the true nature of the Social Security Trust Account and

Page 3 of 32
the obligations and liabilities that the Trust involved. By the government’s silence
on the matter, the government established, by fraud, a Constructive Trust Agree-
ment with me which must be vitiated. Since receiving that Account, I have
through my religious instruction come to the belief that the Social Security num-
ber and/or Birth Number (CUSIP’s) may be what is referred to in the Holy Bible,
Book of Revelation 13:16-18 and 14:9-10, as the mark of the beast or at the
least its precursor. For me to participate in that program and continue to use
that number may place my eternal soul in jeopardy. This I will not and cannot
do.

The money which I have paid into that Socialist Security system for over my life-
time, including the monies paid by my employers’ demand, is hereby made as
demand for full reimbursement to me. I also now understand that my SS number
or CUSIP was used, via fraud while under the extreme duress of child birth, us-
ing my mother as an informant to give me up to STATE without full and honest
disclosure was bonded and insured since my birth. And at present those funds
are being used by multiple Corporations including multiple Life insurance policies.
I demand that those bonds and policies be redeemed for real monies and if any
debts are proved against me those debts withheld as payment in full that I may
be made whole and the balance paid to me in real money. US Postal Money Or-
ders, gold or silver shall suffice. Collapse the CQV, I am the beneficiary.

I do not wish, nor am I permitted by God, to make myself a ward of the State,
as would be the case if I accepted the Social Security benefits. I demand the
same treatment that was given to the people of the Philippines who were partici-
pants in the Social Security Trust and who choose Citizenship of the Philippines
over that of the United States. As the Social Security program is not a feudal
contract, in that Congress gave no property rights to a Social Security Trust Ac-
count, I demand the contract be voided and all monies returned, as would be the
case for any fraudulent contract or Constructive Trust Agreement. The United
States Government Corporation should not enrich its self from the Fruits of a Poi-
sonous Tree.

I emphatically deny that I have ever filed for bankruptcy protection with any de-
gree of complete understanding and honest disclosure. Nor have I ever given my
Page 4 of 32
Power of Attorney to anyone or to the State of Oregon or any of the union states
or territories of the UNITED STATES (Corporation) government for the purpose
of instituting a bankruptcy action in my name with any degree whatsoever of
complete understanding, full and honest disclosure or without great duress. Nor
granting that my Labor and or my Property of whatever kind, or wherever situ-
ated, be held as collateral in any bankruptcy proceeding of the State or Federal
governments. Nor any scheme, using my labor and property as collateral, to sup-
port or fund a fiat money scheme of the Federal Reserve Bank, Inc. and/ or the
State of Oregon, State of California, and/or Federal UNITED STATES Govern-
ment. I have found even real property has been stolen from me through fraud
by agents of county on behalf of STATE. This should be Allodial to me under
Land Patent and described in metes and bounds. Not in lot block tax#.

Since 1609, My family first arrived these shores, And now many, many genera-
tions of my once proud and patriotic family will suffer the anxiety of their spirit
as a result of my having chosen to recognize the malignant and treasonous mis-
conduct of this government against “we the people” and speak out against it.

Some of my reasons for repudiating that Citizenship status are defined in the fol-
lowing Articles and by the totality of this document, are made a part hereof.

I have lived a productive and eventful life, now in anticipation of the end and
God’s mercy an grace. Undoubtedly the singularly most horrific moment of that
life was the conviction to repudiate my Citizenship of the “UNITED STATES”.
Those words, “REPUDIATE MY CITIZENSHIP,” crushed the very soul within me. I
stood beneath that war flag I served with pride for my entire life. Not even
knowing the existence of the civil flag of peace until a few years ago. The memo-
ries of our brave young men, comrades in arms, who defended the Constitution,
who never had a life, flood before me. They sacrificed all of their tomorrows so
that I might have mine. Those memories will always remain with me and be re-
membered with humble honor and gratitude.

Our educational propaganda system is a joke, our children are taught only what
the fraud of government wants known and nothing more.

Page 5 of 32
The awful knowledge and horror of betrayal by my own government of which I
was once so proud, is an unbearable sorrow that I must now carry to my grave;
but I shall do so a free man.

Perhaps the American people are like the frog that is heated slowly to a boil in a
pot of water. If we had detected the heat sooner, we could have jumped out,
saving both the Republic and ourselves.

But, alas, our fathers and grandfathers were asleep at the helm and not as vigi-
lant as they were instructed to be by Thomas Jefferson. Americans are now
awakening to the cataclysmic reality of a Fascist, one-world government, having
replaced our intended Constitutional Republican Government.

ARTICLE I

The Declaration of Independence for the united States of America clearly out-
lined the necessary course each citizen must take when his government became
insufferable. Over the past one hundred years, nearly all of our unalienable
rights have been stripped from us through the sophistry and obfuscation of the
Courts and blood lust of the Congress for spending debt-based money borne on
the back of the American people. What they have done is egregious, but as the
Declaration of Independence points out, “... all experience hath shown that
Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right
themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed.” By suffer-
able, I believe they meant survivable.

That same Declaration also declared: “We hold these Truths to be self evident,
that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with cer-
tain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
Happiness – That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among
Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that when-

Page 6 of 32
ever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right
of the People to alter or abolish it...”

Since 1861, We have been under Martial Rule, And the 41st congress adjourned
Sin Die it has operated as De Facto.

Since 1871, the united States of America, became The United States of America
Corporation, without disclosure of the facts and without the vote of the people.
And with the 14th Amendment and the redefining of the word “Person” All were
made US Citizens without disclosure of what that meant made all Persons Slaves
and residents of Washington D.C.

Since 1911, and its Federal Reserve Act has given our currency to a Private
mostly foreign owned and controlled Corporation.

Since 1933, beginning with the confiscation of our Gold and Allodial property,
rather than “secure” our Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, our
government has persistently and systematically reduced our standard of living.
But this Evil seemed survivable, so we just suffered and let it pass, letting the
water get a little hotter.

Since 1871, our government has refused to “secure” our Right to Life, Land or
Liberty by persistently increasing our burden by Regulations, prohibitions, legal-
ized abortion and unlawful taxes. They have bastardized our Judicial System with
Statutory Law, replacing the Common Law and the protections which it afforded
us with the severe and brutal Equity/Admiralty jurisdictions, where the Constitu-
tion is of no protection. They have lied and withheld the truth about the jury’s
power to judge the law as well as the facts, all but turning the jury system into a
prosecutor’s tool and not our protection from over-zealous prosecutors that it
was intended to be through nullification.

They have increased our Prison population to nearly Two and a half million in-
mates, the largest imprisonment of its own citizens of any country in the world.
They now prepare plans for new prison construction for the new millennium, pro-
jecting twenty years in advance and building cells for our as yet unborn children,
as though all or most of our offspring will be criminals. This reality alone reduces
Page 7 of 32
the expression, “The home of the brave and Land of the Free” to mere illusion
and an oxymoron. But these evils were/are also sufferable, and we let the water
get hotter. They have done this not to secure justice to protect the people but
are imprisoning people without a crime. No victim No crime! And a corporation of
any sort be it The UNITED STATES or STATE of Franchise or Burger King, has a
living soul to be harmed. With the “Patriot Act” and the “NDAA” US Citizens are
held without due process, without a jury of their “Peers” as defined by Black’s
Law Dictionary, without adequate defense or of benefit of witnesses or evidence
that is not allowed, at the whim of corrupt judges, being lied to by Actors of the
court, those members of the Bar Association. Completely blatantly obvious and
repulsive to sit in a court of fake law and watch good men and women citizens
supposed to be under the protection of “government” sent to prison by these ac-
tors when there was no victim and no harm to another living soul. Why I Ask,
Because it is a for profit system! A way to tax the poor with no regard to de-
struction of lives of citizens. Why? Bonds! (Proofed by sf24, sf25, sf25a, and
others) The courts collect billions from (the people’s trust) and judges and prose-
cutors receive “net retention’s” effectively commissions, incentives for a convic-
tion, a system of fraud designed to destroy real justice.

Child kidnapping and trafficking by CPS, CSD, or DHR, workers in cohorts with
courts (Attorneys and Judges) and “Houses” that all make a profit from (Citizens
and Taxpayers) these Heinous Crimes and Trafficking.

The individual Rights guaranteed by our Constitution cannot be compromised or

ignored by our government. For example, in
United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 539 (D. Pa. 1947), Federal District
Court Judge James Alger Fee ruled that,

"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resis-

tant, nor to the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent
thereto. It is a FIGHTING clause. It's benefits can be retained only by sustained
COMBAT. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when in-
sisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in person."

Page 8 of 32
McAlister vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L.Ed. 671; Commonwealth vs.
Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E.
876.
The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or pro-
duce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection.
. . He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt pro-
ceedings, or by habeas corpus." [Emphasis added.]

>> Notice the verdict's confrontational language: "fighting", "combat", and most
surprising, "belligerent". Did you ever expect to ever read a Federal Court con-
demn citizens for being "passive" or "ignorant"? Did you ever expect to see a
verdict that encouraged citizens to be "belligerent" IN COURT...?

Better go back and re-read that extraordinary verdict. And commit it to memory,
for it succinctly describes the essence of the American legal system.

ARTICLE II

Now, the United States government not only refuses to “secure” our Right to
Life, it is openly seeking to diminish or even eliminate that Right in order that a
foreign people we neither know nor see might survive. Thanks to the UN (New
World Order), IMF, CFR, World Bank, NAFTA, GATT, the criminal BAR Associa-
tion, and every whore, coward and traitor elected or appointed to American pub-
lic office that voted in favor of those dastardly Treaties, our very survival as a
people is now at stake. Our government’s Evils are no longer sufferable.

The La Paz portion of the NAFTA agreement provides for the forfeiture of a
thirty-mile wide strip of American soil to a foreign power (the UN) across the en-
tire 1,935 miles of border between Mexico and the U.S.A. Roughly sixty thousand
square miles of American soil is being surrendered without a single shot being
fired. That’s more land than is contained in Rhode Island, Delaware, Connecticut,
New Jersey, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Hawaii combined,
constituting the single greatest act of treachery in the history of this nation. Even
more land is being surrendered as National Parks are converted to UN Bio-

Page 9 of 32
spheres. Thank the Lord that the legislature of Kentucky flat out refused to go
along with the surrender of any of their land to a UN Biosphere. The Antiquities
Act Causes even more.

There is no provision in the Constitution for Congress, the President, or the

Courts to surrender any portion of our national sovereignty to any foreign gov-
ernment.

I am positive that there’s no provision in any State constitution for those States
along the Mexican border to surrender any portion of their State sovereignty to a
foreign power. Those legislators who swore to uphold the national Constitution
have violated their oath to God and the American people’s trust. Our incumbent
politicians are guilty of treason and should so be accused and tried.

The justification for surrendering our sovereignty to the UN (New World Order) is
found in their ecological argument. “The Earth is overpopulated and its resources
are inadequate to support our species. The human population must be reduced
by at least half if our species are to survive.” Well who are they to determine
this, New advances are made everyday in Technology that can change this. Ex-
ample; in a 50’ x 70’ Building I can grow the same amount of highly nutritious
animal feed today as 575 Acres of prime farmland and use 1/400th the water or
in 150’ x 300’ Building as 3750 acres of prime farmland if government would sim-
ply “Get out of the way”.

If that argument is accurate, then there is not enough food or resources to sus-
tain all currently living human life. In any other time throughout the history of
human society, such shortages as described by the ecological pundits would pre-
cipitate violence and unimagined wars, as individuals, families and entire nations
struggled for scarce resources in their survival against other human competitors.
Such has been true since time immemorial. Under such extreme circumstances,
where a foreign power or population might threaten your survival and mine, we
would inevitably deduce that foreign power or population was our mortal “en-
emy.” After all, for them to survive, we must die or at least condemn our chil-
dren and ourselves to a diminished life span.

Page 10 of 32
Yet you look at the UN own Prospectus and of the more than One Trillion dollars
USD Equivalent they take in each year, How much is lent out to those impover-
ished nations as their own mission statement says is their purpose? Less than
2%.

According to Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1, of the U.S. Constitution, “Treason

against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in ad-
hering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”

If the world is on the threshold of a life-or-death Malthusian battle over scarce

resources, what more “aid and comfort” could this government possibly provide
to a foreign people or power than to voluntarily surrender our nuclear technology
to China for political campaign contributions – the surrender of our land and
sovereignty to the UN, as well as our very lives, so that some foreign competi-
tors, our mortal enemies, might survive.

Will the American People just sit back like the frog and let the water boil, letting
this government sacrifice their children’s lives and futures to benefit some for-
eign slaves or aborigines? I don’t think so, and I for one, in the capacity of a Citi-
zen, want no part of this moronic agenda with that insane policy.

ARTICLE III

The United States Constitution is a Compact or Contract between the Federal

government and the “States” of the Union. Its fundamental and guiding principle
is the idea that the State is always a potential source of corruptive power and ul-
timate tyranny.

Originally the Federal government’s responsibilities were confined to a few enu-

merated powers, involving mainly national security and public safety. In the
realm of domestic affairs, the Founders sought to guarantee that federal interfer-
ence in the daily lives of citizens would be strictly limited. They also wanted to
make sure government would have a minimal role in the domestic economy and
that it would be financed and delivered at the state and local levels, not by an
evil and pestilential Central Banking System, as is the Federal Reserve Bank, Inc.

Page 11 of 32
In Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, the enumerated powers of the federal
government to spend money are defined as 18 services under contract with one
more additional service located in the preamble that the States people agreed to
pay for and no more. That Sir’s, is the contract and no more.

These powers include the right to “establish Post Offices and post roads; raise
and support Armies; provide and maintain a Navy; declare War...” and to con-
duct a few other activities related mostly to national defense. No matter how
long one may search, it is impossible to find in the Constitution any language
that authorizes at least ninety percent of the civilian programs that Congress
crams into the federal budget every day of every year.

The federal government has no authority to pay money to farmers, run the
health care industry; impose wage and price controls, give welfare to the poor
and unemployed. They have no authority to provide job training, subsidize elec-
tricity and telephone service, lend money to businesses and foreign govern-
ments, or build parking garages, tennis courts, and swimming pools. But they do.
The Founders did not create a Department of Commerce, a Department of Edu-
cation, or a Department of Housing and Urban Development. Or a Bureau of
Land Management, Or a Federal Bureau of investigation which has no congres-
sional charter to even exist. What Part of 10 Square Miles and forts and ports do
they not get. This was no oversight: they did not believe that government was
authorized to establish such agencies. They were correct; Congress is forbidden
by the Constitution to establish any such agencies.

The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution states clearly and unambiguously:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution ... are re-
served to the States respectively, or to the people.”

In other words, if the Constitution doesn’t specifically permit the federal govern-
ment to do something, then it doesn’t have the right to do it. May God have
mercy on your soul for bankrupting and enslaving our people. Yes, the 14th
Amendment enslaves us albeit voluntary, but without full and proper disclosure,
and this as you know is fraud.

ARTICLE IV
Page 12 of 32
The Bill of Rights clearly defines the most often “government” abused individual
liberties. It forbids the Federal Government to violate any of these unalienable
rights of the people and reserves all other rights of a sovereign not delegated to
the United States, to the States: the States’ authority and sovereign rights would
be determined by the people in their individual state Constitutions. All sovereign
rights not delegated to the Federal or State Governments by the people remains
with the people.

On April 19th, 1993, at Waco, Texas, the United States (Corporation) showed its
utter contempt for the unalienable Rights of its Citizens and the Sovereigns of its
creation. Eighty-six men, women and children were murdered by Agents of the
FBI and BATF, with the sanction of the Executive Branch of that government. An
internal investigation by the Department of Justice (the fox asked to investigate
the fox in the hen house), determined that the agents of the government perpe-
trated no criminal acts. The majority of this nation’s population knows it was
murder and will never forgive nor forget this manifestly evil work. I can no
longer abide in this government’s unlawful conduct and moral bankruptcy, be-
cause as a citizen, by proxy, I am guilty also. This I will not except.

In 2014, In Nevada, They did it again at the Bundy Ranch. Militarized agents
with no de jure authority terrorizing innocent ranchers and their families.

In January 2016, In Oregon, They did it again with the FBI HRT Team, Oregon
State police, With the consent of Governor K. Brown, Senators R. Wyden, and J.
Merkley, A.G. Loreta Lynch, and more than likely your predecessor J Kerry, and
possibly the White House itself. Using a military tactic murdered a Father, Hus-
band, and rancher Lavoy Finnicum a righteous, peaceful and gentle man in a
peaceful protest, Indirectly resulting in deaths of three nurses, and my friend
Blake Paine. Yet ignoring Black lives matter and Antifa, protestors nation wide.

ARTICLE V

I am not anti-government, anti-military, or anti-American. Quite the contrary. For

Generations, My family served the united States of America in both active and in-
active service all over the world. I served a few years as a sworn County deputy,
always defending the Constitution of the United States of America, always in
Page 13 of 32
harm’s way. Veterans like my family joined the military because of our love of
Country and our constitutional obligation. At all times I have defended our Con-
stitution against enemies, foreign and domestic. I never imagined there were any
real “domestic enemies.” Today I know otherwise. The following is a partial ex-
ample of the activities of those “domestic enemies.”

In 1997, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette exposed the “Tuskegee Experiment.” It was
conducted for forty years, from 1932 to 1972. According to the Associated Press,
“The government withheld treatment from 399 black men with syphilis so they
could study how it spreads and kills.”

That’s not an “experiment;” that’s genocide. Whether it happens to one Black

man or ten Eskimos or three Hispanics, it is wrong and violates everything this
country stands for. President Clinton publicly apologized on behalf of this govern-
ment to the aging male survivors. But it wasn’t just the 399 men who were dam-
aged. Their spouses also got the disease, causing their children to be born de-
formed. All told, 6,000 Americans were sickened, deformed or killed as a result
of The UNITED STATES Government’s “Tuskegee experiment” to study how
syphilis kills. President Clinton didn’t bother to acknowledge their suffering.

In 1977 during the Senatorial Select Committee on Intelligence hearings (re-

ported in “Project MK-Ultra; the CIA’s Program of Research in Behavior Modifica-
tion”), the CIA revealed that over forty universities and institutions were involved
in extensive testing and experimentation using covert drugs on unwitting citizens
at all social levels. In 1977, the University of Maryland newspaper reported that
during the 1950s and 1960s, forty-four colleges, fifteen research foundations,
twelve hospitals, and three prisons knowingly participated in MK Ultra experi-
ments, but people that were experimented upon were never informed or asked
to consent to be “guinea pigs.”

Project MK Ultra was one of the biggest military experiments (there were one
hundred forty-nine sub-projects) and lasted for years. It included human drug
and biological testing by the Department of Defense (DOD) under the direction
of the CIA over entire American communities. The Bureau of Narcotics and even
the IRS participated in MK Ultra. When you see these government documents,

Page 14 of 32
they are more frightening than the rumors because our government actually ad-
mits to participating in these experiments.

In 1950, the UNITED STATES government released bacteria – “serratia

marcesens” – that cause pneumonia and urinary tract infections into the San
Francisco Bay. The bacteria were “aerosolized” by the surf and blown inland to
study how effective an offensive biological weapon would be against the people
of San Francisco. According to the report, it blew fifty miles inland. People died
as a result of that experiment. Incidentally, the amount of “serratia marcesens”
still remaining in San Francisco is three times the national average. It follows
that we can legitimately ask how much of the syphilis that we have in the South
today is a direct result of conducting the Tuskegee experiment for forty years
when they could have stopped it? How much of today’s other diseases are a re-
sult of government “experiments”? Is it possible, as some have published, that
AIDS is a product of one of these government experiments?

At the U.S. Army Biological Weapons Research facility at Fort Dietrich, Maryland,
“weaponized” mosquitoes were developed. They actually grew viruses inside
mosquitoes, placed the mosquitoes in balloons, released the balloons from air-
craft over American communities and infected people. They had to infect people
to tell how far the disease went and how far it would spread. How many of to-
day’s diseases are direct results of those experiments?

Tuskegee was not a one-time anecdote; it’s just the tip of an iceberg that indi-
cates they’re still doing experiments on the American people.

Another experiment was done in 1966 at Kessler Air Force Base. In 1966, 12,000
recruits at Kessler received the “micro plasma vaccine.” Obviously another exper-
iment.

“MK Ultra” considered various means of controlling human behavior; it was liter-
ally a mind control project.

“MK Action” was funded with CIA money through the Geschicter Foundation at
Georgetown University. In the 1977 congressional hearing, Dr. Geschicter testi-
fied that during the Vietnamese War, the CIA didn’t know if various Vietnamese
Page 15 of 32
nationals were double agents. Therefore, the CIA included a material in the anti-
cholera vaccine given to pro-American Vietnamese, which made them glow when
they were exposed to an ultraviolet light and helped identify those who rejoined
the Viet Cong. This may be a clever wartime strategy, but it illustrates that as
early as the 1960s, our government used vaccinations for purposes other than
the prevention of disease.

The 1977 Senate Hearing report (Biological Testing Involving Human Subjects by
the Department of Defense) actually says that unwitting American people were
involved in open air testing. For example, it says, “The Army was using live or-
ganisms which we know can infect human beings.” The Food and Drug Adminis-
tration allowed it; entire cities were involved in the testing of these biological
agents.

Our government even placed biological warfare agents in the New York City sub-
way to see how many people would be infected. They did the same thing in
Pennsylvania’s Kittatinny and Tuscarora turnpike tunnels. You would drive
through and receive aerosolized bacteriological agents.

“MK Naomi” – a biological project from the 1950s through 1969 which exposed
six entire towns (including Ft. McClellan, Alabama; San Francisco, California; Ft.
Wayne, Indiana; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and St. Louis, Missouri) to biological
warfare agents dropped out of aircraft to see how many people would become
ill. They say MK Naomi ended in 1969. Why should I believe them?

On page 160 of the 1977 “Human Drug Testing by the CIA” Senate report (S.
1893), they discussed “EA3167” – a compound they could rub up against you
and it would absorb into your skin and kill you. They tested it in Pennsylvania
and Kentucky prisons. It was applied to the skin through some type of adhesive
tape. They also did this on military and civilian people without telling them what
they were exposed to or getting their informed consent. As if anyone would vol-
unteer!

The primary excuse for nearly going to war again with Iraq in February, 1998,
was the suspicion that Iraq had been conducting biological experiments on its

Page 16 of 32
own prisoners. If those experiments are evil for Iraq, how then can they be legal,
moral or ethical, in the United States of America? Have you clones of hydrocar-
bon base gone completely insane?

In 1997 Congressional hearings, the Army admitted conducting these experi-

ments but argued, “We just didn’t tell you about it because nobody was hurt and
there was no problem.” No problem?

I have a serious problem with this outrageous conduct. Title 50, Chapter 32, Sec-
tion 1520, permits the government to experiment on us with biological and
chemical agents. Thanks to a treacherous Treasonous Congress, it is now legal
for the DOD or their contractors to experiment with biological and chemical
agents on the American people. The only proviso Congress imposes on them is
that at least two unspecified local officials be notified within the subject commu-
nity, and they could be the garbage collector or the water meter reader. Once
that major communication event occurs, the test can begin within 30 days. But
we are not told; our children aren’t told. No problem?

Through government oversight and regulations it is done now with our food with
Pesticides, herbicides, RBST, GMO’s, Fluorides, Estrogen sterilization agent coat-
ings on the inside of nearly every can used to can common everyday foods, then
we wonder why men need viagra just to get an erection and why we have a
much higher percentage of unmanly men, and manly women. Harm is done with
Pharmaceutical Drugs, Vaccines, and Heavy Metals. All these things change our
very Gnomes. Our DNA.

Today we are poisoned by our spraying of our air, food, water, doctor’s dealing
legal death drugs, all at the blessing of government. Despicable! Shame on you.

This is but a few of the many reasons, (all would fill many volumes) that I, a God
fearing Living Soul must sever my relationship with the UNITED STATES (Corpo-
ration) government, to ease the heavy burden on my soul these foul deeds have
laden it with. The water has gotten far too hot for this frog/me and is evaporat-
ing under the boil.

Page 17 of 32
“And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having
great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily
with a strong voice, saying, ‘Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become
the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every un-
clean and hateful bird. For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her
fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and
the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delica-
cies.’ And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, ‘Come out of her, my peo-
ple, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not her plagues. For
her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.’” –
Revelation 18: 1-5

As one of God’s people, I must now also leave Babylon the Great and not par-
take of her sins any longer lest I receive her plagues, for her sins have reached
unto Heaven, and God will remember her iniquities. May God have mercy on the
people of the United States/UNITED STATES!

Article VI
What Is The Name of The Crime? — Unlawful Conversion

Obviously, it’s fraud. Barratry at the least. Slavery and involuntary servitude.
That, surely… Trespass also...

But there is so much more to what has been done to us by our "Public
Servants".... conscription, inland piracy, racketeering, kidnapping, press-ganging,
enslavement, false presumption, false arrests, false impersonation, deliberate
mischaracterization, plundering, pillaging, unauthorized hypothecation of debt,
conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy against The Constitution, invasion, trespassing,
copyright infringement, trademark violations, identity theft, grand theft and lar-
ceny, deprivation of rights.....

I could probably go on all night, but at the root of it---- besides constructive
fraud in general, there is a nagging need to nail down a razor-sharp diagnosis of
what has gone on here, and in the end, after several years of ruminating about

Page 18 of 32
this at odd hours, I believe that Congressman Louis T. McFadden nailed it back
in 1934.

Unlawful Conversion
Unlawful conversion of our identities and our assets has been the entire aim of
the Territorial United States/Municipal United States Tag Team. We've had the
British Enemy pretending to be our friend on one side, and the out-of-control
Vatican Thugs on the other, conspiring together against us and against virtually
everyone else's lawful government, too, because the same evils have been vis-
ited on a many other countries including most of Europe, Australia, New Zealand,
Japan, India, Canada, Mexico.... and the list goes on.

Unlawful conversion of our Trade Names redefining them as Foreign Situs Trusts.

Unlawful conversion of our American state national standing to that of mere cor-
porate US "citizens".

Unlawful conversion of our land patents to titles and leases held under color of
law.

Unlawful conversion of our private property to public assets.

Unlawful conversion of our government on the land to a government on the sea.

Unlawful conversion of the copyrights and trademarks we are owed.

Unlawful conversion of our private bank accounts to public "personal" accounts.

Unlawful conversion of our States to "State of States" and "STATE OF STATES".

Unlawful conversion of our public courts to private corporate tribunals.

Unlawful conversion of private civilian assets to public trust assets.

Unlawful conversion of American Common Law to English Common Law.

Unlawful conversion of public records to private registrations.

Unlawful conversion of our right to elect to mere voting privileges.

Page 19 of 32
The sheer scale of this sly, secretive crime spree all across the globe is stagger-
ing, especially when one considers that it has all taken place under a lie, a ban-
ner of freedom and progress---- while in fact delivering a form of modern feudal-
ism instead.

I wonder how long they thought they'd get away with it? And now that they are
standing with their pants down around their ankles, I wonder how long they
think they can still get away with it before we bear arms and grab rope?

How long before the police forces and military wake up and do their jobs and
prosecute the actual criminals?

How long before the government politicians responsible know for sure that they
have been caught and are forced to correct, or none of us will have any reason
to pay them for their "service"?

Article VII

Even the IRS is not who we think they are, IRS agents are neither trained nor
paid by the United States government. Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order
No. 92, the IRS is trained under the direction of the Division of Human Resources
of the United Nations (U.N.) and the Commissioner (International), by the office
of Personnel Management.

In the 1979 edition of 22 USCA 278, "The United Nations," you will find Executive
Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under the direction of the
Secretary of the United Nations. Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91,
the IRS entered a "Service Agreement" with the US Treasury Dept (See Public
Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg.5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!)Plan
No. 26) and the Agency for International Development.

This agency is an international paramilitary operation and according to the Dept

of the Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-7(b) & 1-6, Sec. 1-10 (7)
(c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such activities as, "Assumption of Full or par-
tial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area."

Page 20 of 32
The IRS is also an agency/member of a 169 Nation pact called the International
Criminal Police organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22 USCA 263a. The memo-
randum of Understanding (MOU), between the Secretary of Treasury, AKA the
corporate governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" (International Monetary Fund,
and the International Bank of for reconstruction and Development), indicated
that the Attorney General and it's associates are soliciting and collecting informa-
tion for foreign principles; the international organizations, corporations, and as-
sociations, exemplified by 22 USCA 286f.

According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney Gen-
eral is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the Secretary of Treasury
is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL constitution, these
individuals must expatriate their citizenship. They serve no allegiance to the
United States of America.

The IRS is paid by "The Fund" and "The Bank". Thus it appears from the docu-
mentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service agents are "Agents of a For-
eign Principle" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration
Act of 1938" for private, not public, gain !

The IRS is directed and controlled by the corporate Governor of "The Fund" and
"The Bank". The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection agency are both
privately owned and operated under private statutes. The IRS operates under
public policy, not the Constitutional Law, and in the interest of our nation's for-
eign creditors.

The Constitution only permits Congress to lay and collect taxes. It does not au-
thorize Congress to delegate the tax collection power to a private corporation,
which collects our taxes for a private bank, the Federal Reserve, who then de-
posits it into the Treasury of the IMF !

Page 21 of 32
The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the United States Trea-
sury. They only refer to "The Treasury."

SUPPORTING STATUTES – TITLE 25 USC § 1999

“Whereas the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, in-
dispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness; and whereas in the recognition received emigrants from all nations
and vested them with the rights of citizenship; and whereas it is claimed that
such American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreign states,
owing allegiance to the governments thereof; and whereas it is necessary to the
maintenance of the public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be
promptly and finally disavowed: Therefore, any declaration, instruction, opinion,
order, or decision of an officer of the United States which denies, restricts, im-
pairs, or question the right of expatriation, is declared inconsistent with the fun-
damental principles of the Republic.”

The above statute reads like it was meant for foreigners who come to this coun-
try from all over the world. Definitions are all important in the reading of any le-
gal writing. The definition most important in the above statute is the words “for-
eign states,” so let’s look at some other statutes, Supreme Court decisions and
dictionary definitions that shed more light on those words.

The Constitution was made for States, not territories,” wrote Daniel Webster.
“[T]he Constitution of the United States as such does not under it extend beyond
the limits of the States which are united by and under it,” wrote author Langdell
in “The Status of Our New Territories,” 12 Harvard Law Review 365, 371.

Judicial note should be taken that the United States Constitution always denoted
“Citizen” and “Person” in capital letters prior to the 14th Amendment; thereafter,
“citizen” and “person” were not capitalized. The distinction between “citizens of
the United States” and “Union States Citizens” has been fully recognized by the
Congress and the Courts as follows:

Page 22 of 32
“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a gov-
ernment of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct
from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and
whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect.” a [Emphasis added]

The Federal Government is a “state”. b Foreign State. A foreign country or na-

tion. The several United States are considered “foreign” to each other except as
regards their relations as common members of the Union. (Black’s Law Dictio-
nary, Sixth Edition, page 1407)

Congress identifies these citizens of the “District” as “individuals” or citizens who

reside in the “United States” and who are subject to the direct control of Con-
gress in its local taxing and other municipal laws. Asking one question can clear
up the distinction between the two types of Citizen:

Are both classes of Citizenship the same and, if not, what is the difference?

Citizens of the Union States have the right of suffrage (right to vote); District citi-
zens have no such right.

If you are not a United States citizen of Washington, D.C., or the territories and
possessions, then what are you in relation to the federal government?

a NON-RESIDENT ALIEN or more appropriately known as an...

American State National

At first that term does not seem to describe your relationship to the federal gov-
ernment, but Federal Income Tax Law and the Supreme Court enlighten greater
understanding of the term. The revenue laws do not use the term “sovereign citi-
zen.” Those laws refer to United States Persons, Resident Aliens and Nonresident
Aliens. U.S. persons are defined to include, among other things, citizens and resi-
dents (i.e.: resident aliens) of the United States.

Treasury Decision (TD) 2313

Page 23 of 32
The Supreme Court decision on a tax case determined the issue. Brushaber v.
Union Pacific Railroad Co. Inc. (240 U.S. 1) 1916 is often cited by the IRS as
demonstrating its authority to collect income tax and that the income tax is con-
stitutional (limited application). What the IRS fails to mention, and what is not
apparent from looking at the court’s ruling in the case, is that the case con-
cerned income from within the United States accruing to a nonresident alien,
which is subject to the federal income tax because he was involved in a trade or
business with a federally-chartered corporation.

Treasury Decision 2313 in elaborating on the case makes this apparent:

“Under the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railway Co., decided January 24, 1916, it is hereby
held that income accruing to nonresident aliens in the form of interest from the
bonds and dividends on the stock of domestic corporations is subject to the in-
come tax imposed by the act of October 3, 1913.” (Treasury Decision 2313)

It is based upon the decision of the Supreme Court in a lawsuit brought by a citi-
zen of New York, living in Brooklyn, against the Union Pacific Railway Co., a fed-
erally-chartered corporation. The purpose of the suit was to prevent the railway
company from withholding the 1% tax from the dividends payable to the New
Yorker. The state citizen lost that case. In reliance upon that decision, the Trea-
sury Department referred to the New Yorker as a nonresident alien who, as such,
was not exempt from the withholding of taxes from dividends payable by a do-
mestic corporation (i.e., chartered by the federal government)! The fact that TD
2313 called Mr. Brushaber a nonresident alien seems proof enough that citizens
of states are nonresident aliens for all purposes of the Code, and if this is true,
then a corporation chartered in a state is foreign, while only federally-chartered
corporations can be domestic. So, anything done in a state is done without the
United States.

The Treasury Department actually confirmed their understanding by their analy-

sis of the Brushaber case on the status of a sovereign as being a nonresident
alien for revenue purposes.

Page 24 of 32
A nonresident alien is anyone who is neither a citizen nor a resident (alien) of the
United States. Since the sovereign is not a “citizen of the United States” under
the Code (by virtue of the definition in the regulations), and since he does not fit
the definition of a resident alien, by elimination, he must be a nonresident alien!

The term “alien” must apply to the sovereign, because he is alien to the status of
subject citizen, and he does not fit the special definition of resident found in the
14th Amendment. It may also be said that, since the sovereign person does not
live within the political jurisdiction of the United States, he is nonresident
thereto. Thus, he can be nonresident to the place, as well as nonresident and
alien to the status of subject citizen.

Under the language of the Code, as interpreted by the tax regulations, the sover-
eign may be liable for the tax applicable to the nonresident alien. The Code sub-
jects nonresident aliens to taxes upon income which is received either from a
trade or business “effectively connected with the United States,” or from a
source “within” the United States. Do not assume that this means some place as
foreign as France or Japan. It appears to refer to the fifty states, just as clearly
as did TD 2313.

As to taxability of nonresident alien income, in order for such income of the non-
resident alien to be taxable, it will have to emanate from sources within sover-
eign federal areas or from an activity that is effectively connected with the politi-
cal jurisdiction of the United States by reason of the ATF laws, patents, copy-
rights, federally-created entities, etc. If it emanates from any of the fifty states
and is not “connected” with those federally-controlled activities, such income is
not taxable to the sovereign. Once again, the problem is to find a court that will
apply this truth. To do this, one must show to the court that an activity in one of
the fifty states is “without” the United States.

To do this, it is suggested that a standard form subpoena, as issued by the clerk

of any United States District Court, be marked as an exhibit.

Point to the return of service which states that it is signed “under penalties of
perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States of America.” Then attach it to a

Page 25 of 32
motion which cites 28 USC §1746(1). This statute defines that form of verifica-
tion is applicable only “without” the United States! Also cite 28 USC §297, show-
ing that the fifty “freely associated compact states” are referred to as “coun-
tries.”

Combined with the Brushaber case and TD 2313, one would make it hard for the
court to deny that income from within the fifty states is without the United
States.

Since one has always been a non-resident alien of the United States, also known
as an American State National, it seems absurd that you would be required to
prove it with rebuttal evidence, but that is exactly what you have to do. The gov-
ernment and the courts are not going to let you easily out of the system that it
took them so long to put in place to fund their criminal activity.

Therefore I, demand this affidavit be certified by the Secretary of State, as evi-

dence of my Status as an American State National and a passport correction be
made to reflect such status and jurisdictional venue and returned to me.

Through its regulations, the government has made it difficult to expatriate, as

they require that you leave the country and do the deed at a Consulate or Em-
bassy. However, President Bush may have made the task a little easier since he
has Declared War against Terrorists as (6) formally renouncing U.S. citizenship
within the U.S. (but only “in time of war”) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA); Simply address
the Document to the Attorney General per the regulation.

State citizenship case law

U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) "The term resident and citizen of the United States is
distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special
class of citizen created by Congress."
“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of
each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and
each has citizens of it’s own...”
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

Page 26 of 32
“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,...”
“One may be a citizen of a State an yet not a citizen of the United States”.
McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)

“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,...”

Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)

"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..."
Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383

"Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens." Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.

State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: "the term 'citizen' in the United States, is analogous to the
term `subject' in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in gov-
ernment."

Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226:

"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights
because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citi-
zens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the
federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship."

Supreme Court: US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957:

"The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within
the territorial boundaries of the United States."

The Amendment (14th) recognized that "an individual can be a Citizen of one of the sev-
eral states without being a citizen of the United States," (U.S. v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas.
829, 830), or, "a citizen of the United States without being a Citizen of a state." (Slaugh-
ter-House Cases, supra; cf. U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549 (1875)).

A more recent case is Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966) which says:
"Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not
been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of
Page 27 of 32
his state." Citing U.S. v. Cruikshank, supra.

The courts presume you to be a federal citizen, without even telling you that there are
different classes of citizens. It is up to you dispute this. See…
"Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the
right to inquire and determine a tax liability." U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182
(1982).

"There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one
of the United States and one of the state".
Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 Ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)

"The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct
from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those
which he has under the other".
Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)

"...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent
in state citizenship".
Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)

"There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the
United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such".
Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)
"...the first eight amendments have uniformly been held not to be protected from state ac-
tion by the privilege and immunities clause [of the 14th Amendment]."
Hague v. CIO, 307 US 496, 520
"The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right
to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be
privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amend-
ment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against pros-
ecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment…and in
respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment…it
was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury

Page 28 of 32
guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the
United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore,
that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of
National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment."
Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99

State Citizenship Test

The following are some of the citizenship questions you will see on various government
forms styled in a way to deceive you out of your rights secured by the original constitu-
tion of our republic. United States of America and the original State constitutions. They
have stopped using the term State Citizens on all of the forms for the purpose of con-
structive fraud. Remember that a State Citizen is a not a national of the United States.
But is a national of the United States of America. See…8 USC § 1101(a) (21) The term
state “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state. (This is a State
Citizen)
(22) The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or
(B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to
the United States.
(23) The term “naturalization” means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a per-
son after birth, by any means whatsoever.

There exist mountains of supporting evidence and court decisions regarding my

true status, and it seems absolutely preposterous to require anyone to jump over
obstacles in order to expatriate from tyranny.

Again, this is one of the most important decisions of my life, so I, do not ap-
proach it in a cavalier manner. I, asked the good Lord for direction before mak-
ing that decision.

Notice: that taxes are not even a consideration, as having taxes as one’s moti-
vating reason makes the attempt a Complete failure.

Conclusion
Page 29 of 32
On every front, with blinding speed and inexhaustible power, the evil forces of
darkness of the New World Order are closing a Ring of Fire on freedom. In every
domain and field of human endeavor, the choking, suffocating idolatry perme-
ates all fields of human thought, corrupting our language, destroying truth and
justice, demolishing integrity and virtue, enacting totalitarian legislation and con-
trolling education and communications.

Above all, the vilest evil is the destruction of our unborn children – a thing so
horribly vile that even maggots in filth do not do. Then the attack on our faith
and its foundations of Biblical thought and experience, demonizing God’s follow-
ers as religious right-wing zealots to be held in ill repute, ever rapidly expanding
its deviancy of evil, closing the parameters on the just, as the UNITED STATES
collapses inextricably into Babylon.

What malevolent force of darkness thus captains the ship of State for Columbia,
the Gem of the Ocean?

God save me, but the UNITED STATES government is no longer sufferable. I can
tolerate its pernicious and predatory conduct no longer as a citizen of the
UNITED STATES (Corporate) fiction.

I hereby repudiate, rescind, renounce and disavow any CITIZENSHIP status with
the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT that I may have inadvertently acquired, by
any scheme, for the reasons detailed in the foregoing Articles. My birthright now
being re-secured as a member of the Sovereign Body of freemen and women
known as Americans, American State Nationals, I hereby pledge my allegiance
only to my God. I shall live by the commandment of “Love thy Neighbor” and
shall “Do no Harm” in my private pursuit of life, liberty, happiness.

American State Nationals

Page 30 of 32
I hereby pledge my allegiance only to my God. I shall live by the commandment
of “Love thy Neighbor” and shall “Do no Harm” in my private pursuit of life, lib-
erty, happiness.

America demands no less from me in that freedom has never been free.

My love for the united “States of America” has never been stronger. So help me
GOD; Lord Jesus come quickly, Amen.

This NOTICE is from a man, a living soul, sui juris, jus soli (on the land), a pri-
vate non-citizen, non-resident, non-person, state national pursuant to
8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(21) under Common Law Jurisdiction.
"U.S. adopted common laws of England with the constitution."
See Caldwell v. Hill, 178 SE 383 (1934).

The avoidance of tax is not the purpose of this document, and is both voluntary
and necessary for the 19 essential governmental services the state Nationals, we
the people contracted for and agreed to pay for.

As a “nonresident alien,” my estate and/or trust is, as described in 26 USC 7701

(a)(31), as a TAX-EXEMPT “foreign estate or trust.”

"The Tax Code represents the genius of legal fiction...

The IRS has never really known why people pay the wages/income tax... The
IRS encourages voluntary compliance, through FEAR."

Quote-Jack Warren Wade Jr., former IRS officer in charge of the IRS Nationwide
Revenue Officer Training Program, and written in his book ‘When You Owe The
IRS’

Dated this ___ day of ________ in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine-
teen. David Lester; Straight, Sui Juris, Jus Soli.

Page 31 of 32
The true Beneficent of DAVID LESTER STRAIGHT and all estates of my fathers
and forefathers.
See Genesis ch 1 verse 26-28, Genesis ch 2 verse 7, Job ch32 verse 21

As Beneficiary of CQV under the PCT.

Without Prej- udice - Without Recourse - all unalienable

rights guar- anteed

Auto- graphed by _________________________;

a man, a Living Soul on the ______day of
_______________, 20_____ in the ____
year since Born alive.

Seal

as Notary rePublic and as Jurat Certificate of Acceptance by court officer

Witnessed a personal appearance before me with proper ID recorded

and Sworn before me this ____ day of ____________, 20__

In _____________ County, _____________ state

_______________________________; signature and seal

of Notary Republic

Page 32 of 32