0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views7 pages

11 - MED11S Investigatory Project in Science Teaching Final

Uploaded by

Aileen Torio
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views7 pages

11 - MED11S Investigatory Project in Science Teaching Final

Uploaded by

Aileen Torio
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

UNIVERSIDAD DE DAGUPAN

School of Professional Studies


Arellano Street, Dagupan City

COURSE SYLLABUS
MASTER IN EDUCATION MAJOR IN GENERAL SCIENCE
Institutional Philosophy, Vision, Mission, Objectives and Core Values

 Philosophy
The institution believes that through education, man’s God-given gifts are discovered and developed for his personal fulfillment and community uplift.

 Vision
It envisions to create a community responsive to the challenges of the changing world.

 Mission
It is tasked to prepare the individuals with the best that education can offer in a manner that is consistent with the needs of society.

 Objectives
To encourage critical thinking
To provide competent human resources in various fields
To uphold discipline, justice and equality
To improve man’s equality of life through research and community services

 Core Values
Competence
Unity
Dynamism
Dedication
Integrity
Teamwork

School of Professional Studies Mission

The SPS is dedicated to nurturing resilient, innovative, and lifelong professionals through learner-centered education, fostering the growth of an inclusive and progressive
society.

Page 1 of 7
UNIVERSIDAD DE DAGUPAN
School of Professional Studies
Arellano Street, Dagupan City

Course Information

Program MED- General Science Course Code: MED 011S

Course Title: Investegatory Project in Science Prerequisite: None


Course Credit: 3 Date of Revision: -

No. of Times Revised: 1 Consultation Schedule: Saturday


Course Description:
This course will focus on the principles and concepts in preparing investigatory projects as one of the teaching strategies in teaching Science
in the 21st century. In-depth understanding on how investigatory projects should be conducted in the science classes both in the basic and higher
education. It involves the policies and guidelines in conducting investigatory projects based from international perspectives specifically the
Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF). Likewise, laboratory processes end experimentation; parts and formats in writing
investigatory projects; and critiquing of outputs or sample studies should be included in the discussion.

Course Design Matrix

TIME TABLE INTENDED LEARNING COURSE CONTENT/ LEARNING ACTIVITIES LEARNING RERERENCE/S
(Week) OUTCOMES SUBJECT MATTER ASSESSMENT
 Formulate clear research Introduction to  Lecture or interactive  Participation in  Cunningham, William P
questions and hypotheses. investigatory projects session discussion & Cunningham, Mary.
1  Implement appropriate  Group discussion  Mid term and Principles of
methods for data collection and  Brainstorming session Final environmental science :
analysis.  Workshop Examination inquiry and
 Write scientific reports with  Oral Presentation applications. 9th ed.
structured sections New York : McGraw
(introduction, methods, results, Hill,2020.
discussion).
 Analyze data critically, draw
valid conclusions, and propose
future research directions.
Page 2 of 7
UNIVERSIDAD DE DAGUPAN
School of Professional Studies
Arellano Street, Dagupan City

 Evaluate and solve challenges


encountered during
investigatory projects.
 Understand and apply ethical
principles in research conduct.
 Demonstrate integrity in data
handling and participant
interactions.

 Understand and apply ethical Policies and guidelines  Lecture or interactive  Participation in  Abadiano, Mark N.
principles and regulations in conducting session discussion Research in daily life 1
2 governing research. investigatory projects  Group discussion  Checklist or : qualitative research
 Identify and assess potential  Brainstorming session rubric method. Q.C. :
risks associated with  Workshop  Mid term and Cronica
investigatory projects.  Oral Presentation Final Bookhaus,2016.
 Develop strategies to mitigate  Journal Examination
risks effectively.  Abadiano, Mark N.
 Apply principles of data Research in daily life 2
management in compliance : quantitative research
with institutional and legal method. Q.C. :
requirements. Cronica
 Demonstrate professionalism in Bookhaus,2016.
collaborative research
environments and acknowledge  Brown, Douglas H. &
contributions appropriately. Lee, Heekyeong.
 Reflect on ethical decision- Teaching by principles
making processes and learning : an interactive
experiences encountered in approach to language
research. pedagogy. 4th ed. New
York : Pearson
Education Inc.,2015.

 Master essential laboratory Laboratory processes  Lecture or interactive  Participation in  Hillen,T. et al. Partial
3 techniques, including handling and experimentation session discussion differential equations :
equipment, conducting  Group discussion  Checklist or theory and completely
experiments, and adhering to  Brainstorming session rubric solved problems. 2nd
safety protocols.  Workshop  Mid term and ed. Canada : Friesen
 Develop skills in collecting,  Oral Presentation Final Press,2019.
analyzing, and interpreting  Journal Reading Examination

Page 3 of 7
UNIVERSIDAD DE DAGUPAN
School of Professional Studies
Arellano Street, Dagupan City

experimental data to draw valid


conclusions.
 Apply scientific principles and
critical thinking to troubleshoot
experimental challenges and
optimize procedures.
 Effectively communicate
experimental procedures,
results, and conclusions
through concise written reports
and oral presentations.
 Understand and practice ethical
behavior in scientific research,
including integrity in data
collection, analysis, and
reporting.

 Understand and apply the Parts and formats in  Lecture or interactive  Participation in  Schneider, Joel W. et al.
4 structured format of writing investigatory session discussion Essentials of
investigatory projects, including projects  Group discussion  Checklist or assessment report
sections such as abstracts,  Brainstorming session rubric writing. 2nd ed. New
introductions, methodologies,  Workshop  Mid term and Jersey : John Wiley &
results, discussions, and  Oral Presentation Final Sons,2018.
conclusions.  Journal Reading Examination
 Develop the ability to conduct  Marshall, Steve.
thorough literature reviews, Advance in academic
formulate research questions, writing 1 : integrating
design methodologies, and critical thinking,
collect relevant data using academic reading and
appropriate sources and writing. Canada :
methods. Pearson,2019.
 Analyze and interpret research
findings critically, evaluating
their significance and
implications within the context
of the investigatory project.
 Demonstrate proficiency in
presenting complex research
findings coherently and
persuasively through both
Page 4 of 7
UNIVERSIDAD DE DAGUPAN
School of Professional Studies
Arellano Street, Dagupan City

written reports and oral


presentations, tailored to the
intended audience.
 Recognize and adhere to ethical
principles in research,
including proper citation
practices, respecting
intellectual property, and
maintaining academic integrity
throughout the investigatory
project process.

 Demonstrate proficiency in Presentation of  Lecture or interactive  Participation in  Poth, Cheryl N.


5 organizing investigatory investigatory projects session discussion Innovation in mixed
projects, including clear  Group discussion  Checklist or methods research : a
articulation of objectives,  Brainstorming session rubric practical guide to
methodologies, results, and  Workshop  Mid term and integrative thinking
conclusions.  Oral Presentation Final with complexity.
 Develop skills to present  Journal Reading Examination London : Sage,2018.
investigatory projects  Reflection paper
coherently and persuasively,  Effective presentations :
adapting the presentation style complete A-to-Z guide
to suit diverse audiences. of how to organize and
 Utilize visual aids effectively to deliver powerful
enhance understanding and presentations. USA :
engagement during project ICG,2022.
presentations.
 Prepare to respond confidently
and substantively to questions
and feedback from peers and
evaluators regarding the project
content and methodology.
 Exhibit professional demeanor
throughout the presentation
process, including time
management, adherence to
presentation guidelines, and
respect for audience
engagement.
 Develop the ability to critically Critiquing of  Lecture or interactive  Participation in  Collaborative
Page 5 of 7
UNIVERSIDAD DE DAGUPAN
School of Professional Studies
Arellano Street, Dagupan City

6 analyze investigatory projects, investigatory projects session discussion approaches to


assessing strengths and  Group discussion  Checklist or evaluation: principles in
weaknesses in research design,  Brainstorming session rubric use. Edited by:
methodology, and findings.  Workshop  Mid term and x`J.Bradley Cousins.
 Oral Presentation Final California : SAGE
 Provide constructive feedback  Journal Reading Examination Publication Inc.,2020.
on investigatory projects,  Reflection paper
focusing on clarity, coherence,  Dougherty Stahl,
and logical flow of ideas. Katherine A. et al.
Assessment for reading
 Understand and apply instruction. 4th ed. New
evaluation criteria to assess the York : The Guilford
effectiveness of investigatory Press,2020.
projects in addressing research
questions or hypotheses.  Lougheed, Lin. IELTS :
practice exams. 4th ed.
 Communicate critiques New York : Kaplan
effectively, both orally and in Inc. ,2020.
writing, offering specific
suggestions for improvement
based on evidence and analysis.  Opitz, Michael F. et al.
Understanding,
 Engage in collaborative peer assessing, and teaching
review processes, contributing reading : a diagnostic
to a supportive and approach. 8th ed. New
constructive learning Jersey : Pearson
environment for fellow Education Inc.,2020.
researchers.

Page 6 of 7
UNIVERSIDAD DE DAGUPAN
School of Professional Studies
Arellano Street, Dagupan City

Criteria for Grading

REQUIREMENT Percentage
Mindful Participation in On-line Discussions Including 20%
assignments
Reporting (online & e-copy) 20%
Write-Up or Output 30%
Major Examination 30%
TOTAL 100%

Prepared and Submitted by:

Name of Faculty : RITCHIE G. MACALANDA, PhD


Email Address : [email protected]
Contact Number : 0999-9761-509

Reviewed:
LUIS M. LANSANG, DPA
Program Coordinator
Recommended for Approval:
CARIDAD OLI ABUAN, EdD
Dean, School of Professional Studies

Approved:
JANN ALFRED A. QUINTO, MSIB
Chief Operating Officer

Page 7 of 7

You might also like