0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views5 pages

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED Vs AJ DETERGENTS

Uploaded by

lahop79862
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views5 pages

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED Vs AJ DETERGENTS

Uploaded by

lahop79862
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

2024:BHC-OS:11558

[Link]

jsn

Digitally signed
by JITENDRA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
JITENDRA SHANKAR
SHANKAR
NIJASURE
NIJASURE
Date:
2024.08.02
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
[Link] +0530

IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

COM IPR SUIT (L) NO.18723 OF 2024

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. …Plaintiff

Versus

A J Detergents …Defendant

----------
Laher Shah, Madhuri Tambe and Jayesh Kalebere i/b. Laher Shah for
the Plaintiff.
Sayyed Faijal Sayyed Ahemad, Proprietor of Defendant No.1 present.
Charushila Vaidya 2nd Asstt. To Court Receiver with E.S. D’Souza,
(S.O.) are present.
----------

CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J.

DATE : 1ST AUGUST, 2024.

ORDER :

1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant have arrived at a

settlement in the above Suit. The Consent Terms bearing today’s date

have been tendered and is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for

identification. The Consent Terms have been signed by the

Constituted Attorneys of the Plaintiff and Advocate for the Plaintiff as

well as by the Proprietor of the Defendant. The Proprietor of the

1/5

::: Uploaded on - 02/08/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 06/08/2024 [Link] :::


[Link]

Defendant who has signed the Consent Terms is present in Court.

Necessary authorization of the Plaintiff authorizing the execution of

the Consent Terms is appended to the Consent Terms. Further, the

documents of identification of the proprietor of the Defendant are

also appended to the Consent Terms.

2. I am satisfied that the Consent Terms are in order, not

contrary to law and have been drawn by the parties of their own

volition in reflection of their true intentions.

3. The undertakings, if any, in the Consent Terms being

accepted as undertakings to the Court.

4. The Leave Petition (L) No.20101 of 2024 for leave under

Clause XIV of the Letters Patent Act is allowed.

5. The Defendant has submitted to a decree in favour of the

Plaintiff in terms of the prayer Clauses (a), (b) and (e) of the Plaint.

6. There is an Affidavit bearing today’s date on behalf of

Defendant filed through its Proprietor which is tendered and taken

2/5

::: Uploaded on - 02/08/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 06/08/2024 [Link] :::


[Link]

on record. The Affidavit confirms that the Proprietor of the

Defendant has submitted to the decree in terms of prayer Clauses (a),

(b) and (e) of the Plaint.

7. The Suit is disposed of and decreed in terms of prayer

Clauses (a), (b) and (e) of the Plaint.

8. The Interim Applications, if any, do not survive and are

disposed of accordingly.

9. In Clause 6 of the Consent Terms, the packets seized by

the Court Receiver has been agreed to be opened by the parties in the

presence of their respective representatives of both the Plaintiff and

the Defendant and the detergent powder therein to be returned to

the Defendant and the wrappers / labels forthwith destroyed.

10. In view thereof, the Court Receiver appointed by

this Court is discharged without passing of accounts and upon

payment of costs, charges and expenses to be borne by the Plaintiff.

11. The Court Receiver’s Report No.311 of 2024 stands

3/5

::: Uploaded on - 02/08/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 06/08/2024 [Link] :::


[Link]

disposed of.

12. In Clause 8 of the Consent Terms, it is mentioned that

the Defendant has issued a demand draft bearing No.730903 drawn

on State Bank of India dated 29th July, 2024 (incorrectly mentioned

as Union Bank of India which shall be corrected and initialed by the

Advocate for the Plaintiffs) in favour of the Plaintiff for Rs.35,000/-

towards costs mutually agreed upon between the parties and towards

full and final settlement of this Suit.

13. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff has confirmed

having been handed over aforementioned demand draft in Court by

the proprietor of the Defendant who is present in Court.

14. Drawn up decree/ order is dispensed with unless the

parties seek drawn up decree/ order, in which case they are entitled

to apply.

15. A soft copy of the Consent Terms will be uploaded as the

second order in the matter.

4/5

::: Uploaded on - 02/08/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 06/08/2024 [Link] :::


[Link]

16. The Registry is to ensure that the hard copy of the signed

Consent Terms is permanently retained on file as part of the record

and is not sent for destruction in the ordinary course.

17. Court fees are to be refunded in accordance with the

Rules. For the purposes of Section 43 of the Maharashtra Court Fees

Act and the proviso to that Section, today’s date is the date of making

a claim for repayment. The Prothonotary & Senior Master will issue a

certificate for a refund of Court Fees computed according to the

Rules. He will act on production of an authenticated copy of this

order without requiring a separate application.

[ R.I. CHAGLA J. ]

5/5

::: Uploaded on - 02/08/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 06/08/2024 [Link] :::

You might also like