SSPC Paint 20 2002
SSPC Paint 20 2002
April 1, 2002
SSPC-Paint 20
Zinc-Rich Coating Type I — Inorganic and Type II — Organic
1.2 The vehicle type may be inorganic (Type I) or phosphates, and modifications thereof that must be subse—
organic (Type II). quently cured by application of heat or a solution of a curing
compound (or curing solution).
1.3 This specification does not cover weldable
preconstruction primers such as SSPC-Paint 30. 2.3.2 Type l—B, inorganic self-curing vehicles—water-
reducible, include water-soluble alkali metal silicates, qua-
1.4 Zinc-rich coatings, both topcoated and untopcoated, ternary ammonium silicates, phosphates, and modifications
have been used successfully in a wide variety of environ- thereof. These coatings cure by a reaction among the zinc,
mental zones. For a detailed breakdown of applicability of silicate, steel substrate, and naturally occurring carbon diox-
various types of Zinc—rich coatings in different environmen- ide during and after evaporation of water from the coating.
tal zones, refer to SSPC-PS Guide 12.00. Consult the
coating manufacturer for specific exposure recommenda- 2.3.3 Type l-C, inorganic self-curing vehicles—solvent-
tions (see Note 12.1). reducible, include titanates, organic silicates, and polymeric
modifications of these silicates. These systems are depen—
1.5 This coating is intended for application by spray for dent upon moisture from the atmosphere to complete hy-
use by itself or as a primer in a multi-coat system. drolysis, forming the titanate— or polysilicate—Zinc reaction
product.
2.Descfipfion
2.3.4 Type II, organic vehicles covered by this specifica-
tion may be chemically cured or may dry by solvent evapo-
2.1 USE OF SPECIFICATION
ration (see Note 12.3). Under certain conditions heat may be
used to facilitate or accelerate drying and curing.
2.1.1 Primers meeting this specification are catego-
rized according to vehicle type and zinc level.
2.4 COMPONENTS: These zinc dust primers may con-
sist of one, two, or three components.
2.1.2 If no vehicle type is specified, either Type |
(Inorganic) or Type II (Organic) is acceptable (see Section
2.5 ZINC DUST LEVEL CLASSIFICATION: The coat-
2.3).
ing shall be classified according to the level of zinc dust by
weight present in the dried film as follows:
2.1.3 If no zinc level is specified, zinc levels 1, 2, and 3
Level 1 — equal to or greater than 85%
are acceptable (see Section 2.5).
Level 2 — equal to or greater than 77% and less
than 85%
2.2 COMPOSITION: The coating described in this
Level 3 — equal to or greater than 65% and less
specification consists of zinc dust, functional additives, and
than 77%
SSPC-Paint 20
April 1, 2002
4.2.2 Other pigment components may include extend— 6.1.1 The pigment portion of a multi-component coating
ers, curing aids, tinting colors, and suspension and pot-life (if supplied as a dust) shall be dry and loosely packed prior
control agents. to mixing.
5.5 SCRIBING: Scribe two parallel lines on the face of 6.4 WORKING PROPERTIES: The mixed coating shall
the coated panels so as to expose the underlying metal spray easily and show no signs of, streaking, running,
before testing. The lines shall be at least 2.5 cm (1 inch) from sagging, or other objectionable features when applied within
the edge, the top, and the bottom of each panel and at least the coating manufacturer’s recommended film thickness
5 cm (2 inches) from each other. Each scribe shall be at least range and tested in accordance with FED—STD-141, Meth-
6 cm (2.4 inches) long. The scribes may run vertically or at ods 4331 and 4541.
an angle across the face of the panel. Follow the scribe—
making procedure described in ASTM D 1654. 6.5 FLASH POINT: The minimum flash point, as deter-
mined by ASTM D 3278, should be “none” for inorganic
5.6 BACKS AND EDGES: Coat and seal all edges and water—based Zinc dust coatings, and a minimum of 44°C
the back side of each panel with a coating or tape that will (40°F) for solvent— based inorganic zinc primers (Type I) and
provide the necessary protection to these surfaces. for organic zinc primers (Type II).
SSPC-Paint 20
April 1, 2002
7. Laboratory Physical Tests of Applied Films of dispute, unless otherwise specified, the arbitration or
settlement procedure established in the procurement docu-
7.1 MUDCRACKING: The coating, when applied and ments shall be followed. If no arbitration procedure is estab-
aged in accordance with Sections 5.1, 5.2, and 5.4 to a 125 lished, the procedure specified by the American Arbitration
micrometer (5 mil) minimum dry film thickness, shall show Association shall be used.
no signs of mudcracking visible to the eye unaided by
magnification. 10.2 Samples of paints may be requested by the pur-
chaser and shall be supplied upon request along with the
7.2 ADHESION: The coating, when applied, dried, and manufacturer’s name and identification for the materials.
cured in accordance with Section 5, shall be tested per Samples may be requested at the time the purchase order
ASTM D 3359, Method B. There shall be no separation of the is placed or may be taken from unopened containers at the
coating or delamination of an entire square. Loss of adhe- job site.
sion around the perimeter due to cutting of each square is
acceptable. The adhesion rating shall be no less than grade 48. 10.3 Unless otherwise specified, the sampling shall be
in accordance with ASTM D 4380.
8. Accelerated Laboratory Weathering Test
11. Disclaimer
8.1 SALT FOG EXPOSURE TEST: Triplicate panels
prepared in accordance with Section 5 shall be exposed in 11.1 While every precaution is taken to ensure that all
a salt fog cabinet in accordance with ASTM B 117. Inorganic information furnished in SSPC standards and specifications
coatings (Type I) shall be exposed for 3000 hours and is as accurate, complete, and useful as possible, SSPC
organic coatings (Type II) shall be exposed for 1000 hours cannot assume responsibility nor incur any obligation result—
(aee Notes 12.5 and 12.6). ing from the use of any materials, coatings, or methods
specified herein, or of the specification or standard itself.
8.1.1 Rust Evaluation: After the specified exposure
time, each replicate panel shall have no rusting of the coated 11.2 This specification does not attempt to address
portion. Slight rusting in the scribe mark is permissible and problems concerning safety associated with its use. The
resulting staining should be ignored. Strips 6 mm (1/4 in) user of this specification, as well as the user of all products
wide along the edges of the panel may be ignored. or practices described herein, is responsible for instituting
appropriate health and safety practices and for ensuring
8.1.2 Blister Evaluation: After the specified exposure compliance with all governmental regulations.
time, there shall be no blistering for Type I coatings; medium
blistering is permitted for Type II coatings per measurement 12. Notes
guidelines of ASTM D 714.
Notes are not requirements of this specification.
8.1.3 Scribe Evaluation: After the specified exposure
time, there shall be no undercutting from the scribe. 12.1 USES: This primer covers a range of vehicle types
(inorganic/organic, water-borne/solvent-borne, one-pack/
9.LabeHng two-packlthree-pack, chemical curing/thermoplastic). A de-
tailed description of environmental zone conditions is con-
9.1 Labeling shall conform to ANSI Z129.1. tained in Chapter 1 of the SSPC Painting Manual, Vol. 2—
Systems and Specifications, Eighth Edition. Consult SSPC-
9.2 Technical data shall be provided for at least all data PS Guide 12.00 and coating manufacturers for specific
elements categorized as “essential” in SSPC—Guide 13. exposure limitations. PS 12.00 does not address Zinc dust
loading. Caution should be used when zinc-rich coatings
10. Inspection contact austenitic stainless steel. In case of fire, molten zinc
metal may cause embrittlement of austenitic stainless steel.
10.1 All materials supplied under this specification are
subject to timely inspection by the purchaser or his autho- 12.2 VOC CONTENT: Each coating, after recommended
rized representative. The purchaser shall have the right to thinning, must conform to published government regula-
reject any materials supplied that are found to be defective tions regarding volatile organic compound (VOC) content.
under this specification (see Notes 12.7 and 12.8). In case VOC information should be supplied on the label or the
SSPC—Paint 20
April 1, 2002
technical data sheet. Various governmental agencies may with sea water, appropriate test requirements other than
have different VOC limits or use different methods of testing. those already specified might be:
The owner may modify this specification as necessary to - Synthetic Sea Water Immersion (4,000 hours) ASTM
specify a particular VOC content limit consistent with local D 1308
regulations. Coatings meeting the composition and perfor- - Oil Immersion (4,000 hours) ASTM D 1308
mance requirements of this specification usually have a - A cyclic combination of both
VOC level less than 500 g/L (4.2 Ib/gal). Comparative testing of all candidate zinc-rich coatings
will be more meaningful than individual testing of each
12.3 TYPE II, ORGANIC VEHICLE TYPES: Typical of coating.
this group of vehicles are phenoxies, catalyzed epoxies,
epoxy esters, moisture-curing polyurethanes, styrenes, sili- 12.6.2 Sources for Other Tests: Standard tests that
cones, and vinyls. This listing is not all—inclusive. may be useful for further qualification are available from a
number of organizations, including ASTM, U.S. Govern—
12.4 LEAD LEVEL IN ZINC DUST: ASTM D 520 speci- ment Federal Specifications (TT-P; MIL-P, etc.), Federal
fies three types of zinc dusts for use as pigments in coatings. Test Method Standards (141), and the Canadian Govern-
Type | is a general grade in which no maximum level of lead ment Specifications Board. A partial listing of public zinc—
is specified. Type II is a high-purity grade with a maximum rich specifications requiring qualification testing is presented
lead level of 0.01% by weight. Type III is the highest purity in the Notes of SSPC-PS Guide 12.00.
grade, with a maximum lead level of 0.002% by weight. Any
grade of zinc dust can be used in the zinc coatings covered 12.7 The procurement documents should establish the
by this specification. However, it is important to note that if responsibility for samples, testing, and any required affida-
Type I zinc is used, it is possible to exceed the permissible vit certifying full compliance with the specification.
exposure limit (PEL) for lead when the products are re—
moved by abrasive blasting. For additional information relat- 12.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTS: If the user
ing the lead content of the coating to worker exposure to chooses, tests may be used to determine the acceptability
lead during blasting see Gary L. Tinklenberg and Denise M. of a lot or batch of a qualified coating. The quality assurance
Doezema, “Health Concerns for Workers Using Zinc-Rich tests are used to determine whether the supplied products
Coatings,” Journal of Protective Coatings and Linings, Vol. are of the same type and quality as those originally tested
15, No. 5 [May 1998], pp 36-46. In addition to lead, cadmium and certified for acceptance. The selected tests should
and other toxic metals may pose a health hazard. Placing accurately and rapidly measure the physical and chemical
overly restrictive requirements on some materials may re- characteristics of the coating necessary to verify that the
sult in the inability of manufacturers to produce products supplied material is substantially the same as the previously
meeting this specification. accepted material. All of the quality assurance tests must be
performed on the originally submitted qualification sample.
12.5 Coatings that fail the ASTM B 117 test may perform The results of these tests are used to establish pass/fail
well under actual service conditions. For most coatings, the criteria for quality assurance testing of supplied products.
use of ASTM D 5894 instead of ASTM B 117 has proven to
be a more reliable predictor of performance. However, it 12.8.1 Establishing Quality Assurance Acceptance
appears that untopcoated zinc-rich primers may still be Criteria: Many ASTM test methods contain precision and
reasonably evaluated using ASTM B 117. bias statements. Specification developers should be cogni-
zant of the fact that these statements exist. Quality assur—
12.6 ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATION TESTS: Because ance test criteria should not be more stringent than the
of the diversity of potential service environments, the user interlaboratory precision of the test methods used.
may require the zinc-rich coating be further exposed and Example: A common quality assurance test is den-
qualified by at least one additional test relating to the sity (weight per gallon) as measured by ASTM D 1475.
intended exposure. It should be emphasized that a well- The interlaboratory reproducibility at the 95% confi-
designed non-standard test may often provide more mean— dence level tells us that because of errors associated
ingful information for a given service condition than one or with the method, any two measurements of the same
more standard tests. material can differ by as much as 1.8%, without the
measurements being considered suspect. This only
12.6.1 Immersion Tests: If, for example, the intended represents the precision of the measurement technique
service is a petroleum tanker cargo hold which is ballasted and does not account for normal variances in the manu-
factured product.
SSPC-Paint 20
April 1, 2002
The acceptable range for paint density must be stated. 12.9 For a performance specification of a zinc coating,
For example, a composition specification may state this refer to SSPC—Paint 29.
requirement as 10.0 i 0.2 lb/gal, 10.0 lb/gal i 2%, or as
a range from 9.8 to 10.2 lblgal. The manufacturer of ANNEX — Method for Measuring Dry Film Thick-
proprietary products should provide this information. ness on Coated Steel Test Panels
Using these values, if the manufacturer’s lab measures
the density to be 9.8 lb/gal, the product meets the 1. Panel Size: The test panel shall have a minimum area of
specification and the paint is shipped to the job. Be— 116 cm2 (18 inchz) and a maximum area of 930 cm2 (144
cause of the lab-to-lab variation of 1.8%, the user’s lab inch?); e.g., minimum 7.5 x 15 cm (3 x 6 inch) and maximum
may measure the density of this sample to be as low as 30 x 30 cm (12 x 12 inches).
9.8 less 1.8% of 9.8 (equals 9.6) lblgal. Similarly for the
high end, the manufacturer may measure density of 2. Procedure: Use a Type 2 constant pressure probe gauge
10.2 lb/gal while the user measures 10.2 plus 1.8% of as described in SSPC—PA 2. Take two gauge readings from
10.2 (equals 10.4) lb/gal. The pass/fail criteria for the the top third, the middle third, and the bottom third of the test
user to accept a batch of paint should therefore be 9.6 panel. Readings should be taken at least 25 mm (1 inch)
to 10.4 lblgal. from any edge and from any other gauge reading. Discard
Where precision and bias data are not available for a any unusually high or low gauge reading that cannot be
given test method, determine the standard deviation of repeated consistently. Take the average of the six accept-
a minimum of five measurements taken on the originally able gauge readings.
tested and certified material. The pass/fail criterion is
that the measurement of the test sample shall fall within 3. Minimum Thickness: The average of the acceptable
two standard deviations of the target value. The con- gauge readings shall be no less than the specified minimum
tracting parties must agree on a target value. thickness. No single gauge reading shall be less than 80%
of the specified minimum.
12.8.2 Recommended Quality Assurance Tests:
Recommended quality assurance tests include but are not 4. Maximum Thickness: The average of the acceptable
limited to, infrared analysis (ASTM D 2621 ), viscosity (ASTM gauge readings shall be no more than the specified maxi-
D 562), weight per gallon (ASTM D 1475), total solids (ASTM mum thickness. No single gauge reading shall be more than
D 2369), dry time (ASTM D 1640), percent pigment (ASTM D 120% of the specified maximum. If no maximum thickness
2371), color (ASTM D 1535), condition in container (FED— is specified, the maximum shall be 2 mils above the mini-
STD-141, Method 3011), and odor (ASTM D 1296). mum or 135% of the minimum DFT, whichever is greater.