IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P. (CRL) No. / 2022
IN THE MATTER OF:
ABHISHEK AND ANR PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
RESPONDENTS
INDEX
S. JUDGMENT PARA PAGE
NO. NO. NO.
NO OFFENCE MADE OUT
1. Vijay Kumar Ghai and Others vs The State of West 41-47, 64
Bengal (2022) SCC OnLine SC 344
(u/s-420, 406 and 120B of IPC)
2. Randheer Singh v. State of UP. & Ors. (2021) SCC 32,33,35
OnLine SC 942
(u/s 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC)
3. Satishchandra Ratantal Shah v State of Gujarat & Anr. 11-16
(2019) 9 SCC 148
(u/s 406, 420, 417.IPC)
4. All Cargo Movers (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Dhanesh 13,14,15
Badarmal Jain (2007) 14 SCC 776
(u/s 406,420 of IPC)
DISPUTE IS ENTIRELY OF A CIVIL NATURE
AND THEREFORE SUMMONING ORDER IS
LIABLE TO BE QUASHED
5. Mitesh Kumar J. Sha v. State of Karnataka and Others 41-48
[2021 SCC OnLine SC 976]
(u/s -406, 419,420 r/w Section 34 of IPC)
6. Anand Kumar Mohatta & Anr, v. State (NCT) of Delhi. 26-30
Dept. of Home & Anr. [(2019) 11 SCC 706]
(u/s 405,406 of IPC)
7. Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd and Ors 12-
(2006) 6 SCC 736 14,22,31
8. G. Sugar Suri & Anr. V. State of State of U.P. & Anr. 7,8,14
[2000 (2) SCC 636]
(u/s 406/420 of IPC)
9. Pepsi Foods Ltd. And Anr. V. Special Judicial 22,28,29
Magistrate (1998) 5 SCC 749
POWERS OF THE HC TO QUASH
PROCEEDINGS U/S 482 CRPC CAN BE USED IN
EXCEPTIONAL CASES
10. Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V. State of 63,80
Maharashtra and others. [2021 SCC Online SC 315] (xiv),
(xv)
(u/s 406/420/465/468/471 and 120B of IPC) (xvi)
NEEHARIKA JUDGMENT ALLOWS FOR
SPACE TO THE HCS TO PASS INTERIM
ORDERS
11. A.P. Mahesh Cooperative Urban Bank Shareholders 21
Welfare Association v. Ramesh Kumar Bung & Ors.
[(2021) 9 SCC 152]
(u/s 409/420/467/468/471 & 477A
r/w 120B of IPC)
