Morphology and Syntax Overview
Morphology and Syntax Overview
CHALIMABANA UNIVERSITY
PRIVATE BAG E 1,
LUSAKA
AUTHOR: HANDILI JIMAIMA
Copyright:
© 2022 Chalimbana University
All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or
recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the copy write owner,
Chalimbana University.
[ii]
Acknowledgements
The Directorate of Distance Education wishes to thank Handili Jimaima for the
contribution to this course.
[iii]
Introduction
Rationale
This course is divided into Phonetics and Phonology, Morphology and syntax.
Phonetics and Phonology, the first part of the course, as you saw in the first module,
explains to you how English language is pronounced in the accent deemed as the
standard for people learning the English spoken in England. The course also provides
principles that regulate or account for use of sounds spoken in English. In addition,
the course also presents information contextually about speech sounds and how these
are produced and classified. The second part, which is Morphology, in this module,
involves detailed study of the internal structure of English words and word formation
processes. The study includes derivational and inflectional Morphology. Syntax, the
third part (also in this module) engages and is devoted to the syntactic analysis of
language. It concerns itself with the ways in which words combine to form sentences
and the rules which govern the formation and analysis of sentences, making some
sentences possible and others not possible within a particular language.
Aim
The course is designed to introduce you to English morphology and syntax. The aim
of this course is to equip you with analytical skills for examining the nature of
morphology and the various ways of forming words in the English language. The
course will enable you to achieve, through comprehension and practice, skills and
aptitude in analyzing different types of word structures, not only in English, but also
in other languages. The second part of the course is syntax, the part of linguistics that
studies the structure and formation of sentences. It explains how words and phrases
are arranged to form correct sentences. The course also explains that, to create
grammatically correct and acceptable English sentences, we have to follow the
English rules for syntax.
[iv]
Course Outcomes
Summary of Module
The module is divided into two parts. On the one hand, first part deals with
morphology, the study of the internal structure of words and related issues. Related
issues include such things as word elements, word segmentation and word formation
processes. On the other hand, the second part deals with syntax which deals with the
organisation of words into sentences and the rules that govern such organisation.
[v]
Study Skills
As an adult learner, your approach to learning will be different to that from your
school days: you will choose what you want to study, you will have professional
and/or personal motivation for doing so and you will most likely be fitting your study
activities around other professional or domestic responsibilities. Essentially, you will
be taking control of your learning environment. As a consequence, you will need to
consider performance issues related to time management, goal setting, stress
management, etc. Perhaps you will also need to reacquaint yourself in areas such as
essay planning, coping with exams and using the web as a learning resource. Your
most significant considerations will be time and space i.e. the time you dedicate to
your learning and the environment in which you engage in that learning. We
recommend that you take time now - before starting your self-study - to familiarize
yourself with these issues. You can find a number of excellent resources on the web.
So, familiarise with the information technology.
Time frame
This module is to be covered in the period of 9 months. You will be expected to spend
at least 60 contact hours with the lecturer and 60 hours of self-study.
Course material
Study units
Text books
Dictionaries
Charts
Pre-recorded Audio lessons &
DVDs
If you should need help, you can contact email jimaimahandili@[Link] or call
+260 977 508 566. You may also see us physically at Chalimbana - Department of
Literature and Languages.
Recommended readings
[vi]
Assessment
Assessment Percentage
Course Work 50%
One Assignment 25%
One Test 25%
Final Exam 50%
Final Mark 100%
Table of Contents
[xvii]
[xviii]
UNIT ONE: INTRODUCING MORPHOLOGY
1.0 Introduction
This unit introduces you to Morphology. It discusses what Morphology is and what it
is all about. In looking at what Morphology is all about, the unit discusses the two
basic divisions of Morphology, which are Inflectional and Derivational Morphology.
Not only that, the unit also looks the morph, morpheme and allomorph; the three
central units of analysis in morphology.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this unit, you should be able to:
Explain the concept morphology
Discuss the two divisions of morphology
Explain the different types of morphemes
Analyse the different approaches to the study of the morpheme
[1]
1.2 The Morph
You will notice that the word Morph has several definitions. It can be described as the
smallest structurally significant unit that has constant semantic value. It is also said to
be an element of language; an element of speech or writing that represents and
expresses one or more Morphemes. Each morph represents a particular morpheme.
Such a morpheme may be the plural Morpheme, the Root Morpheme, the Tense
Morpheme, the Agentive Morpheme, the Possessive Morpheme or the Superlative
Morpheme. A Morph is the physical realisation or exponent or representation of a
Morpheme. It can also be said to be the phonological representation of a Morpheme.
In other words, a Morph is a word segment that represents a Morpheme in sound or in
writing. The following are some examples:
1.3 Morpheme:
Ever since the term morpheme was introduced, a high number of different linguistic
scholars have had a critical look at this phenomenon, which appears to be so
important to the field of morphology. Even though it has been investigated deeply
throughout the past century, scholar‘s opinions still differ according to their definition
of the morpheme as well as to its importance to linguistics in general. There are
however three approaches that linguists have adopted when it comes to defining the
morpheme. You will notice that each approach looks at the morpheme from a
different perspective.
1.3.1 Structural Approach
All linguists agree that, within words, meaningful parts can be perceived; any exercise
that is aimed at studying those meaningful elements within a word is said to be termed
morphology. Morphology therefore is the study of the meaningful parts of words. The
word ‗teacher‘ for instance comprises two components namely teach (verb) and –er
(suffix). This is what morphology seeks to explain.
[3]
meaningful unit, she meant the unit which cannot be further broken up without
destroying or drastically altering its meaning. For example, though the word reality
can be further broken down into real and –ity (making two morphemes), it cannot be
further broken down without altering its meaning. This shows the common difference
between reality and realities: an attempt to further break down the former results into
producing an entirely different meaning in the plural sense.
One may also not be able to add a morpheme to an utterance without altering the
meaning of such utterance. For example, adding un- to known changes it to unknown
and so alters the meaning of the former. Bloomfield (1933:24) quoted in Nida
(1974:6) corroborates this description by defining it as ―a linguistic form which bears
no parallel phonetic-semantic resemblance to any form‖.
[4]
more than one phoneme as the case may be, then a combination of phonemes must
conform to certain rules or possess given characteristics to qualify as morphemes.
Since the morpheme is abstract, it is realised in speech and writing by discrete units
known as morphs; as discussed above.
1.4 Allomorph
We wish to introduce the allomorph to you. Note that English has several morphemes
that vary in sound but not in meaning such as for the past tense and for the plural. For
example, in English, a past tense morpheme is – ed in regular verbs. It occurs in
several allomorphs depending on its phonological environment, assimilating voicing
of the previous segment. And so, by definition, an allomorph is any one of the
different phonological realisations of a morpheme. An allomorph occurs when a
morpheme is phonologically represented by different morphs in different
environments and the morphs cannot be substituted for each other. Such morphs are
said to be in Complementary Distribution. So when a morpheme has more than one
phonological realisation, each of these realisations is an allomorph. Let us consider
the following examples:
[5]
From these examples, /s/, /z/ and /iz/ are allomorphs of the Plural Morpheme. They
are the different phonological realisation of the Plural Morpheme. Each of this is an
allomorph of the Plural Morpheme.
Rule 1:
The Plural Morpheme, the third person Singular and the Possessive Morpheme are
realised as /s/ after voiceless consonant sounds.
Rule 2:
The Plural Morpheme, the third Person Singular and the Possessive Morpheme are
realised as /z/ after voiced sounds (both vowels and consonants).
Rule 3:
The Plural Morpheme, the third Person Singular and the Possessive Morpheme are
realised as /iz/ when they appear after voiced affricates and fricatives.
Rule 4:
The Past Tense Morpheme is realised as /t/, /d/, and /id/ when it appears after
voiceless consonant sounds (both vowels and consonants) and alveolar plosives
respectively.
In irregular verbs and irregular nouns, the Past Tense and the Plural Morpheme are
realised by vowel change in some cases and vowel addition in others. As a result,
vowel change and vowel addition are considered allomorphs of the two morphemes
on the basis of Complementary Distribution. They are in Complementary Distribution
with the other allomorphs of the two Morphemes.
For example, in changing the verb come from the Present Simple to Past Tense, the
morph –ed representing the Past Tense Morpheme is not visible in the word came (as
it is, for example, in talked) but it is understood. The Past in this case is formed by
vowel change. Vowel change is, therefore, another allomorph of the Past tense
Morpheme. The allomorph is not determined by the phonological form of the morph
[7]
to which the Past Tense Morpheme is attached. It is triggered by the nature (internal
structure) of the morpheme is attached. This is called Morphological Conditioning.
Another example is the Plural Morpheme in men from the singular man. Here too the
morpheme is realised through Vowel Change and so vowel change is yet another
allomorph of the Plural Morpheme on the basis of Complementary Distribution.
Reflection
Think of the different approaches to the definition of the morpheme. Do you think
they provide appropriate definitions?
1.7 Activity
1.8 Conclusion
The unit has endeavoured to bring to your attention the two basic divisions of
morphology. In addition to that, discussed in the unit are the morph morpheme,
classification of morphemes and the allomorph.
1.9 Summary
It is hoped that you have gained insight on the important concepts in morphology
covered in this unit. It is also hoped that you have clearly understood and can also
apply them in your morphological analyses. In the next unit, you will be introduced to
the classification of morphemes.
[8]
UNIT TWO: CLASSIFICATION OF MORPHEMES
2.0 Introduction
This unit exposes you to the types and characteristics of morphemes and gives
copious examples. Since this course is English Morphology, most of our examples
will be drawn from the English Language.
Learning Outcomes
state what free morphemes are, and how they can be identified
state what bound morphemes are, and how they can be identified
identify inflectional and derivational bound morphemes and their roles in
morphology
explain the difference between inflectional and derivational bound
morphemes.
Speakers of a language can recognize that word forms may include a number of units.
For example, we can make out that English word forms like plays, player, played and
playing can be split into pieces; they are made up of one unit play, and a number of
other elements like -s, -er, -ed and -ing. All these elements are called morphemes, the
minimal units of meaning or grammatical function that are used to form words
(Lieber, 2009, p. 32).
From this definition of a morpheme we can say that units of meaning include forms
like play and units of grammatical function include elements used to show present
tense or plural. The word visitors consist of three morphemes. One minimal unit of
meaning is visit, another minimal unit of meaning –or, (marking ―person who does
something‖), and the other minimal unit of grammatical function -s (indicating
plural). In the news headline ―Shopping center in Lusaka reopened after ‗suspicious
package‘ turned out to be empty suitcase, the word reopened also contains three
[9]
morphemes. Open is a minimal unit of meaning, re- is another minimal unit that
means ―again‖ and – ed is the other minimal unit of grammatical function that shows
past tense. In linguistics, a morpheme is conventionally indicated between braces. For
example, the word refill consists of {re}+ {fill} + {-ed}. In this unit, this form of
technical notation has not been used for practical purposes.
Morphemes have many characteristics that will be examined in the next sections. For
now, it is worth emphasizing a few. One or more morphemes may represent a single
word, as exemplified in (a) – (d).
Lexical morphemes are those that have meaning by themselves (more accurately, they
have sense). Grammatical morphemes specify a relationship between other
morphemes. But the distinction is not all that well defined. Nouns, verbs, adjectives
({boy}, {buy}, {big}) are typical lexical morphemes. Prepositions, articles,
conjunctions ({of}, {the}, {but}) are grammatical morphemes.
Free morphemes are those that can stand alone as words. They may be lexical
morphemes ({serve}, {press}), or grammatical morphemes ({at}, {and}). Bound
morphemes can occur only in combination—they are parts of a word. They may be
[10]
lexical morphemes (such as {clued} as in include, exclude, preclude) or they may be
grammatical (such as {PLU} = plural as in boys, girls, and cats).
English has only eight inflectional affixes as demonstrated in (e) (i) – (viii)
Morphemes are categorised into various as discussed in 2.2.1. Pay particular attention
so that you grasp the concept of morpheme classification.
Words are made up of morphemes either free or bound. The free morpheme is the
core part which usually sit anywhere within a word. On its own, it can function as an
independent word, that is, a word that can stand on its own because it carries meaning.
So, Free morphemes can stand alone as words and can be lexical or grammatical. The
following words are free morphemes: school, church, boy, girl, teach, courage,
examine, etc. Another name for the free morpheme is the base or stem or root. As the
[11]
base or core, it can accept other elements either before it or after it. Note that whether
the free morpheme or base or core is attached to another element or not, it can stand
on its own. Most free morphemes are content or lexical words. It is a meaning
carrying unit. Some linguists also refer to the free morpheme as a full morpheme. The
full morpheme is one which is meaningful, which has inherent meaning. Examples of
the full morpheme are content words e.g. Verbs, Adjectives and some Adverbs.
The omission of –ly in glad renders the sentence ungrammatical. Grammatically, the
sentence should read, ―Mundiwa gladly praised God‖. Most bound morphemes are
grammatical or functional elements in language. Bound morphemes are of two types.
Some bound morphemes have the ability of changing word class or forming or
generating new words while others only inflect the word they are added to. This takes
us to another segment in this discussion. We can further discuss morphemes at
another level as follows:
This is a morpheme that cannot stand on its own and can only occur as part of a word.
e.g. –ing, -ed, -ful, -mis, -anti, -less, etc. Affixes, (both suffixes and prefixes) are
examples of Bound morphemes.
Bound morphemes may be lexical e.g. (clude) as in include, exclude, preclude, or may
be grammatical such as (plural-s) as in boys, girls, cats.
[12]
2.2.3 Empty Morpheme:
A major division in the morpheme concept is free and bound. A free morpheme has
been referred to as an independent word. The bound morpheme is of two types:
inflectional and derivational. An inflectional morpheme, which is a type of a bound
morpheme, is defined by linguists as a mere grammatical indicator or marker. An
inflectional morpheme cannot generate or create new words nor can it affect the
grammatical class of a word. Let us look at the examples in (i) – (j).
It indicates tense – Tense relates to a verb. It then means that to indicate tense, it
affects verb. A verb is affected in the following ways; see (l) – (m).
write walk + s, write + ing, (writing), write + en (written) ‗s‘ is the third person
singular marker, ‗ed‘ is the past tense marker while ‗ing‘ is the continuous tense
marker.
It indicates number – plurality. Plurality deals with nouns. Nouns are affected by
number. Nouns are subdivided into singular and plural. Plural regular nouns are
indicated with‗s‘. Thus, (n) - (p) shows the examples.
[13]
(n) boy + s = boys
The‗s‘ above is a plural marker and it is an additive morpheme. It indicates that the
morpheme carrying it is ‗more than one‘.
It indicates comparison. Adjectives are used to compare. Thus, this third part affects
adjectives. Adjectives have comparative (for two people) and superlative (more than
two people) forms as in (q) - (r).
The ‗er‘ and ‗est‘ morphemes are used to indicate comparative superlative forms of
the adjectives fat and fast above.
This change in word class, caused by the addition of a derivational bound morpheme,
is not restricted to a particular class of words. It affects all classes of words. This
transformation does not, however, affect the lexical meaning of the base forms of the
free morpheme. That is, the lexical meanings of the core or base or free morpheme
remain unchanged. See this in (s) - (w).
- en weak weaken
- ize liquid liquidize
- fy solid solidify
Example:
[15]
2.6 Conclusion
In this unit, we have discussed types of morphemes, thereby looking at free and bound
morphemes. We also looked at the sub types of the bound morpheme – inflectional
and derivational morphemes with the characteristic features displayed by each of
them. We also looked in an affixation as an aspect of bound morpheme, though with
more of it to come under morphological processes or word formation processes.
2.7 Activity
2.8 Summary
We are convinced that you have had an experience on the important concepts the
types of morphemes covered in this unit. We envisage that you have clearly
understood and can also apply them in your morphological analyses of not only the
English language but African languages in general and Zambian languages in
particular. In the next unit, you will be introduced to the word.
[16]
UNIT THREE: THE WORD
3.0 Introduction
This unit exposes you to the word and elements that make up the word. The unit also
discusses different elements that make up a word. In the unit, other aspects discussed
are word segmentation and word formation processes.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this unit, you should be able to:
discuss characteristics or features of a word
elements and aspects of a word
distinguish between inflectional and derivational affixes
segment words into their constituent parts and name the parts appropriately
describe the constituent structure of a morpheme
The term word is not quite easy to define, but we know, intuitively what a word is and
we can distinguish word from what is not a word quite easily. Different scholars have
defined the word differently. Some have said it is a single distinct meaningful element
of speech used with others (or sometimes alone) to form a sentence and typically
shown with a space on either side when written/printed. In linguistics a word is the
smallest element that may be uttered in isolation with semantic or pragmatic content.
The word and morpheme are important concepts in morphology. This is because one
or more morphemes make a word. The dictionary defines a word as a single unit of
language which has meaning and can either be spoken or written. It is also a lexical
item that becomes meaningful when used in a context or in discourse where it now
has some grammatical properties.
[17]
3.2 Characteristics or Features of a Word in the English language
Note that every word has its world-class, that is, it has information as to whether the
word is a noun, an adjective, an adverb or a verb. The syntactic information helps us
to know the appropriate environment for the word. In other words, the right position it
would occupy in a sentence as well as its role.
The semantic information demonstrates that every word has a meaning whether
integral, inherent or contextual. This semantic meaning helps us to know, for
example, whether we have been abused or commended or indeed requested.
Each word has its distinctive way of being pronounced by the native speakers.
Whether borrowed into the English language or not, whether anglicized (make or
become more English) or not, the phonological information aids pronunciation.
Every word has a particular context of usage. This is also referred to as situational
usage of words. The focus of Pragmatics is on the principles that govern language use,
which are: the producers‘ (speaker, writer) intentions and receivers (hearer and
reader) and principally on contexts.
All words have their own peculiar internal structure or shape. This has to do with the
way phonemes and morphemes in the language are arranged. Morphological
information enables us to know what combinations of items are permissible and
which ones are not.
[18]
in the word untouchables, there is only one inflectional affix, the plural Morpheme s.
Removing the ‗s‘ gives us untouchable, which is our stem in this case.
3.3.2 Root
A root is that part of a word which remains after all the inflectional and derivational
affixes have been removed. In other words, a root is what remains of a word after all
the affixes have been removed. It is for this reason that a root is sometimes referred to
as that part of a word which cannot be analysed into any smaller units. This further
implies that a root can also be a stem in some cases. In the word treated, for example,
the removal of the inflectional affix –ed gives us the stem treat which is, at the same
time, the root because it cannot be analysed or split into any more smaller units.
3.3.3 Base
3.3.4 Affixes
An affix is any linguistic unit attached to (or affixed to) a word. (Put simply, affixes
are bound morphemes which may occur either at the beginning or at the end of a
word). An affix may be attached to the beginning of a word or at the end. An affix
attached to the beginning of a word is called a prefix while the one attached at the end
is called a suffix. There is need to mention here that a detailed account of affixes has
been given in unit four under word formation processes. Here we only discuss them
on the surface since they occur in the word which is under discussion in this unit.
From here on, we can interchangeably use the expressions bound morphemes and
affixes comfortably so that we do not confuse ourselves.
[19]
3.3.5 Inflectional Affixes
Inflectional affixes are affixes which when attached to a word change neither the part
of speech nor the meaning of the word to they are attached except the structure of the
word. This type of affixes is attached at the end of the word, so they are all suffixes
and are Bound and Empty. These include plural markers (boy + s = boys), tense
marker (talk + - ed = talked), comparative (tall + - er = taller), the possessive (dog +
„s = dog‟s), and the superlative (tall + -est = tallest).
Derivational affixes on the other hand are those which when attached to a word will
change both the structure of the word to which they are attached and the meaning.
Derivational affixes basically create new words. Like inflectional affixes, they are
bound and empty as in the following: (teach + - er = teacher), (un + known =
unknown), (nation + - al = national).
3.4 Inflection
Inflection is the process by which a change is made in the form or structure of a word
to express its relation to other words in a sentence in terms of number (Plural) Case
(Possessive) degree (Comparative/Superlative) and time (Tense). Inflection is
achieved through inflectional morphemes. These include the Plural Morpheme, the
Possessive Morpheme, third Person Singular, the Past tense, the Comparative and the
Superlative. All inflections are suffixes. These aspects have been explained further in
unit four.
3.5 Derivation
Derivation is the process whereby new words are formed from existing ones by
affixation. Like inflectional affixes, these too have been explained in detail in unit
four.
[20]
Teach - Teach -er (Agentive)
Leader - leader -ship (Noun to Noun)
Accept - accept -able (Verb to Adjective)
In inflection, both meaning and word class of the word involved are maintained while
in derivation the meaning of the word always changes, and in some cases, the word
class also changes.
3.5.1 Inflectional morphemes: vary (or "inflect") the form of words in order to
express grammatical features, such as singular or plural or past or present tense. Thus
Boy and boys, for example, are two different forms of the "same" word; the choice
between them, singular vs. plural, is a matter of grammar and thus the business of
inflectional morphology (Crystal, 1976). Refer to inflectional affixes.
3.5.2 Derivational morphemes make new words from old ones (Crystal, 1976). Thus
creation is formed from create by attaching –ion to the word. But the two are distinct
and separate words. Refer to derivational affixes.
Do not change basic meaning or part of speech, e.g., big, bigg-er, bigg-est are
all adjectives.
Express grammatically-required features or indicate relations between
different words in the sentence. Thus in Rhoda love-s John: -s marks the 3rd
person singular present form of the verb, and also relates it to the 3rd singular
subject Rhoda.
Are productive. Inflectional morphemes typically combine freely with all
members of some large class of morphemes, with predictable effects on
usage/meaning. Thus the plural morpheme can be combined with nearly any
noun, usually in the same form, and usually with the same effect on meaning.
Occur outside any derivational morphemes. Thus in ration-al-is-ation-s the
final -s is inflectional, and appears at the very end of the word, outside the
derivational morphemes -al, -is,-ation
In English, inflectional morphemes are suffixes only
Always one in a word
[21]
3.6.2 Derivational morphemes generally
Change the part of speech or the basic meaning of a word. Thus -ment added
to a verb forms a noun (judg-ment). re-activate means "activate again."
Are not required by syntactic relations outside the word. Thus un-kind
combines un- and kind into a single new word, but has no particular syntactic
connections outside the word -- we can say he is unkind or he is kind or they
are unkind or they are kind, depending on what we mean.
Are often not productive -- derivational morphemes can be selective about
what they'll combine with, and may also have erratic effects on meaning. Thus
the suffix -hood occurs with just a few nouns such as brother, neighbour, and
knight, but not with most others. e.g., *friendhood, *daughterhood, or
*candlehood. Furthermore, "brotherhood" can mean "the state or relationship
of being brothers," but "neighbourhood" cannot mean "the state or relationship
of being neighbours."
Typically occur between the stem and any inflectional affixes. Thus in
governments, -ment, a derivational suffix, precedes -s, an inflectional suffix.
In English, derivational morphemes may appear either as prefixes or suffixes:
pre- arrange, arrange-ment.
Can be more than one in a word
untouchable - stem
touch - root
able - derivational affix, suffix
un - derivational affix, prefix
s - inflectional affix, suffix
(a) Phonological form /s, z, iz/ and /t, d, id/; for the Plural marker s and the
Past Tense marker – ed respectively.
[22]
(b) Recurrence with regular meaning as in:
ill natured
ill mannered
ill treat
where ill has a constant/regular meaning of ‗bad or badly’. In splitting words on the
basis of recurrence with regular meaning, the remaining units must have either
semantic or grammatical meaning.
It is not possible to split the following words the way they have been split.
understand un derstand
underhand un derhand
undergo un dergo
because the remaining segments –derstand, -derhand and –dergo are meaningless.
Now let's consider the word unlockable. We can see that there are two different
meanings for this word: the one corresponding to the left-hand figure, meaning "not
lockable," and the one corresponding to the right-hand figure, meaning "able to be
unlocked."
[23]
Fig 1
By making explicit the different possible hierarchies for a single word, we can better
understand why its meaning might be ambiguous. And, in fact, un- can indeed attach
to verbs: untie, unbutton, uncover, uncage, unwrap... Larry Horn (1988) points out
that the verbs that permit prefixation with un- are those that effect a change in state in
some object, the form with un- undoing (!) that change. And thus we can account for
the two senses of unlockable: the sense derived from the suffix -able combining with
the verb lock to form an adjective lockable and then the adjective combining with the
prefix un- to form a new adjective unlockable, as in the lefthand in fig 1, vs. the sense
derived from the prefix un- attaching to the verb lock to form a new verb unlock and
then combining with the suffix -able to form an adjective unlockable, as in the
righthand tree in fig 1.
3.7.2 Conclusion
This unit has exposed you to the word and its features. In addition to that, the unit also
covered elements and aspects of the word and further looked at processes of
inflection, derivation. Furthermore, the unit has also dealt with inflectional and
derivational affixes as well as word segmentation.
3.7.3 Activity
2.7.4 Summary
[24]
We are hopeful that your interaction with this unit has been exciting educative. Our
hope is that you were able to see the value of features of words in morphology and
how important the elements of words are in morphological analysis. If there are some
concepts you may not have understood, go back to the unit and read again. The next
unit exposes you to word formation processes or morphological processes.
[25]
UNIT 4: WORD FORMATION PROCESSES (Morphological Processes)
This unit introduces you to the word formation or morphological processes. In the
unit, you will be exposed to different word formation processes and what is involved
in each case.
4.0 Introduction
Learning Outcomes:
The ‗Word Formation Process‘ is regarded as the branch of Morphology, and it has a
significant role in expanding the vocabulary that helps us communicate very
smoothly. The main objectives of the word-formation process are to form new words
with the same root by deploying different rules or processes.
At this point, we can say that the word-formation process is a process in which new
words are formed by modifying the existing terms or completely changing those
words.
It is important to note that word formation processes are of different types and
include: clipping, compounding, affixation, blending, backformation, reduplication,
[26]
acronymy and many more. In the subsequent section, we look at each of the types of
morphological processes in detail.
4.1.3 Clipping
Clipping can also be seen as extracting a shortened form of a word from its longer
morphological from. In English, for instance, ‗telephone‘ becomes phone; brassiere is
bra; In some cases, the clipped version has more or less completely replaced the
original longer word, e. g. flu from influenza. Note that a clipped form is a complete
lexical unit which should not be confused as abbreviation of its full form.
Crystal (1999) defines ‗clipping as a type of word formation in which new words are
derived by shortening another word‘. Some of the examples he gave include, exam
from examination, and ad for advertisement. However, Aronoff (1997) defines
clipping as a process that shortens a polysyllabic word by deleting one or more
syllables.
[27]
(c) doc – from doctor
(d) exam - from examination
(e) memo – from memorandum
Initial/fore or aphresis or indeed procope clipping is the kind of clipping in which the
first part of the word and maintain the last part or final. Consider the following in (f) -
(i).
This is the kind of clipping where the middle part of the word is left out. Of course, it
must be stated that words with this kind of clipping are few. They are of two kinds.
The first kind includes words I which the final-clipped stem retains the functional
morpheme while the second kind includes contractions due to a gradual processes of
elision under the influence of rhythm and context. Consider examples in (j) - (m).
In this type of clipping, the clipped forms are also used in compounds. What basically
happens is that one part of the original compound most often remains intact.
Examples include the following as in (n) - (o).
(n) cablegram – from cable telegram (one part (cable) remains intact)
(o) navicert – from navigation certificate (navigation certificate)
[28]
4.2 Compounding
Compounding is a morphological process in which two or more words (Roots) are put
together to act as a single lexical word with a distinct meaning. The words so formed
by this process are called compounds. Odebunmi (2006) observes that in forming
compounds, two or more words are combined. Compounds can either be transparent
of opaque and are further sub-categorised into three. They may be solid - cardboard,
hyphenated – mother-in-law or two-word – hot dog.
Transparent compound words are those whose meaning can easily be interpreted or
understood from the constituents. The meaning of the compound airmail, for
example, can easily be understood as mail delivered by air. Other examples would
include examples in (p) – (q).
(p) teacup
(q) notebook
Opaque compounds on the other hand are those whose meaning cannot be interpreted
from the constituent parts. The meaning, for example, of the compound blackmail
cannot be understood from the constituent parts. Other examples would include (r) -
(s).
(r) lady-killer
(s) put out
You may wish to know that other different combinations are actually possible.
Consider the following in (t) – (y).
(t) Noun + Noun compounds – heartbroken, home sick, airport, basketball
(u) Noun + Adjective compound - bloodthirsty, praise worthy, colour-blind
(v) Adjective + Noun – greenhouse, bluebird, whiteboard, smart phone
(w) Verb + Noun – rest house, washing machine, pickpocket, typewriter
(x) Noun + Verb – rainfall, haircut, sidesteps, airlift
(y) Verb + Preposition – roll on, take away, stand by, stick on, tear up
(z) Adjective + verb – whitewash, blacklist, highlight, proofread
[29]
We wish to state here that these combinations cannot be exhausted. You are therefore
encouraged to use the web to source many other possible combinations. A few more
have been listed in the following section.
4.3 Affixation
If we use the position in which an affix occurs in relation with the location of the root
of a word as the basis for classifying affixes, then we have the following types: prefix,
suffix, infix, interfix, circumfix, and superfix or suprafix. In this unit and module,
however, we have only attempted to discuss prefixes and suffixes. You may read
about the others from the web.
[30]
4.3.2 The prefix
A prefix is an affix which occurs before the root or base of a word. Examples of
negative prefixes in English are presented in table:
The suffix is an affix which occurs after the base or root of a word. Some examples of
suffixes in English are presented in tables.
In the preceding section, affixes have been classified based on the position they
occupy in relation to the position of the root or base of a word to which they have
been attached. In this part of the unit, we classify affixes based on the function they
perform when attached to a word.
Note that affixes can perform essentially three functions when they are attached to the
root of a word. These are inflectional, derivational and extensional functions. We
shall discuss these functions under inflectional, derivational and extensional affixes.
[32]
Of course, remember that inflectional and derivational affixes were partly touched in
unit four. However, this unit simply adds a little more clarity on them.
[Link] Inflectional Affixes
[33]
[Link] Derivational Affixes
A derivational affix is one which changes the part of speech or alters the meaning of
the word to which it is attached. These too were referred to in the preceding unit.
However, like inflectional affixes, a little more detail has been given in this unit.
Robins (1964) argues that derivational affixes are divided into class changing and
class maintaining types. Both the class changing and class maintaining derivational
affixes affect the lexical meaning of the word to which they are attached, while only
the class changing ones affect the syntactic value (i.e. the part of speech) of the word.
It has now become a common practice to treat affixes which extend or modify the
meaning of their hosts separately from the class-changing ones.
Presented in the following table are the major differences between inflectional and
derivational affixes in English:
Examples showing derivational affixes that change the part of speech of their
hosts.
Prefix Function (s) Example
a- Verb to Adj. Afloat
be- Noun to Verb bewitch
Adj. to Verb befool
de- Noun to Verb defrost
em- Adj. to Verb embitter
en- Noun to Verb enslave
Note: The derivational prefix em- is a variant of en- when it occurs before bilabial
consonants
4.4 Borrowing
Borrowing stands out as one of the commonest ways of creating new words in human
language. It simply means the process or taking words from one or more languages to
fit into the vocabulary of another. It is must be noted that no language is free from
borrowing. Borrowing presupposes some element of cultural contact. According to
Donwa-Ifode (1995), two or more languages are said to be in contact if they are used
by the same individuals or group of persons alternately. The individual using the
[34]
languages is referred to as the ‗locus‘ of the contact. The language that borrows from
the other is said to be the ‗recipient‘ language, while that from which the item is
borrowed is known as the ―donor‘ language‖.
Borrowing involves different forms which include loan-word, loan-blend and calque
or loan-translation.
4.4.1 Loan-Word
4.4.2 Loan-Blend
(jj) Ditransitive where the prefix di has its etymology in Greek and transitive,
English though originally Latin.
(kk) Bitransitive where bi has its origin in Latin and transitive English.
4.4.3 Calque or loan translation
4.5 Blending
Looking at the examples in (oo) - (tt), it seems that a blend, as other literature state,
is achieved by taking only the beginning part of one word and joining it to the end of
another word. But it is essential to mention that the decision as to where to begin or
end the cut is arbitrary.
This is a word formation process in which a new is formed by virtue of shifting the
stress from syllable to the next. Sometimes this is also referred to as functional shift.
Put simply, we can say it is a change in lexis that is as a result of change that occurs in
stress placement e.g. re'cord (v) and 'record (noun). Indeed, a change in stress
[36]
placement on a word may classify two utterances into different category of the units
of grammar. Consider the following examples in (uu) – (vv):
(uu) Lulu and Handili like Mulala (that is, both ‗Lulu‘ and ‗Handili‘ have
affection towards ‗Mulala‘).
(vv) Lulu and Handili, like Mulala love table tennis. (that is, ‗Lulu‘ and
‗Handili‘ both love to play table tennis game as much as ‗Mulala‘).
In example (uu), ‗like‘, which is said with a rising tune is a linking verb that connects
the subjects ‗Lulu‘ and ‗Handili‘ to the object ‗Mulala‘. In (vv), the ‗like‘, produced
with a falling tone changes its role as a verb to an adverb and turns ‗Mulala‘ to a
qualifier element in the adverbial group.
In the following two-column table, examples in English have been used to show how
a change in stress placement can trigger a meaning difference between segmentally
identical words:-
NOUN VERB
'Insult In'SULT
'CONvert Con'VERT
'Import IM'port
'Rebel re'BEL
'Export ex'PORT
'SUBject sub'JECT
'CONtest con'TEST
'PERmit per'MIT
'SURvey sur'VEY
4.7 Conversion
(ww) Talk - The talk was lengthy. (the verb talk changed into a noun)
(xx) Cheat - The boy is a cheat. (the verb cheat changed into a noun)
[37]
(yy) Guess - He made a guess. (the verb guess changed into a noun)
Nouns too may be converted into verbs, e.g. bottle (she bottles up her anger); also,
referee (He referees the match). This process makes the creation of new words a daily
occurrence. It is important to mention that conversion is categorised into partial and
full conversion.
In partial conversion, the new word that has been formed does not take up all the
characteristics of the new word class into which it has been changed. This has been
demonstrated in the subsequent section.
The word ‗kind‘ which is an adjective for example, if changed to a noun would not
take up the plural and therefore would not inflect for number. E.g. the adjective kind
changed to a noun. See (zz) - (aaa).
(The noun, ‗The kind‟ cannot inflect for number to become The „kinds‟), for it would
be ungrammatical.
As opposed to partial conversion, in full conversion, the item that has been changed
into another class takes up all the characteristics of the new class to which it has been
changed.
Derivation refers to all the essential components of an underlying base which are
incorporated into another meaning, belonging to a distinctly different semantic
domain. For example, compare man in the following two contexts
[38]
The meaning of man is included within the meaning of man in (bbb) which refers to a
human being and man in (ccc) which refers to an activity. The two belong to entirely
different semantic domains.
What is observable in the four contextual uses of the single English lexical item paper
would seem to make it clear that the meanings of the first three italicized (ddd) - (fff)
items constitute central - peripheral meanings, while the meaning of the last italicized
item (ggg) is a derivation of the first. The question deducible from this analysis is
which of the ‗papers‘ can be considered the central or base meaning of ‗paper‘? Thus
it is established that it is almost impossible to provide a semantically neutral text. To
resolve this seeming crack, linguists prefer to examine the nature of lexical meanings
and their distribution in English not only in terms of their specific ‗semantic‘ uses as
individual item but also in terms of their relations to certain features of certain critical
[39]
area of experience in which lexical items have been used. This entails the observation
of the sum of its syntactic features or possible grammatico-semantic (and
phonological) manifestations.
4.7.4 Reduplication
[40]
The examples from (lll) - (ooo) illustrate reduplication as a morphological process.
We may want to add that these are not the only words that are formed as a result of
reduplication. There are several others such as dilly-dally, shilly-shally and more, and
you can find them on internet.
4.7.5 Nominalisation
Words other than nouns or pronouns converted from other word classes and are made
to behave as nouns are called nominalisations. They include verbs and adjectives –
determiners, ordinals, or genitive phrases. As converted nouns, they function as
headword in the group in which they occur. The bold and italicised are the examples
of the nominalisations.
Infinitival nominalisation – the verbs are usually marked by ‗to‘ e.g. to be, to
sing, to err, to sleep, etc. Consider (sss) - (ttt)
(sss) To err is human but to forgive is divine
(ttt) To write has been a Herculean task.
The suffix –ness can be added to an adjective to form a noun as in (yyy) - (aac).
[41]
thoughtful + ness = thoughtfulness; careful + ness = carefulness
Other adjectives functioning as nouns include: all, both, some, such, first, a few, etc.
(aad) All are cordially invited.
(aae) Both are acceptable options.
(aaf) Some will not come.
(aag) A few were present.
4.7.6 Acronymy
This is a word formation process that involves the creation new words from the initial
letters of a set of other words. Words formed in this way are called acronyms.
Acronyms often consist of capital letters. The subsequent section shows some
examples of acronyms are as in (aah) - ().
Coinage is the word formation process in which a new word is created either
deliberately or accidentally without using the other word formation processes and
often from seemingly nothing. This is a morphological process of creating new words
to name previously non-existent objects or phenomena that result from cultural
[42]
contact. The coined word, with the passage of time, gains currency within a speech
community. Invented trade names such as Xerox and Kleenex are recent additions to
the English language. They have quickly become everyday words in the language.
The word Xerox used to refer only to a company that produces a type of
photocopying machine. Recently, the word has come to be used to refer to the process
of photocopying in general. Also the Kleenex used to refer to a brand of facial tissue,
but now it has come to denote facial tissue in general. Again, the word crane is a
name for a very large bird with very long neck. But now there is a heavy-duty
machine called crane which is used for lifting heavy objects. This machine also has a
long neck. In a way, the machine has taken its name from the bird.
4.78 Conclusion
In this unit, we looked at morphological processes and hope that you can easily
describe what happens in each process as new words are being formed.
Activity
4.7.9 Summary
In this unit, you have studied the different morphological processes and what actually
what happens in the formation of new words. We are hopeful that you took note of the
differences that exist among different morphological processes.
[43]
UNIT FIVE: SYNTAX
Welcome to Syntax, the third and last component of the course ELE 2100 – Structure
of the English Language. We hope you have gained mastery of the first two parts.
This unit exposes you to syntax and syntactic analyses of the English language.
5.0 Introduction
Besides sleeping, eating and drinking, talking is one of the most common of human
activities. Hardly a day goes by when we don‘t talk, if only to ourselves! When we
speak, we utter a stream of sounds with a certain meaning, which our interlocutors can
process and understand, provided of course they speak the same language. Apart from
the spoken medium, language also exists in written form. It then consists of a string of
letters which form words, which in turn make up sentences.
If you have thought about language, you will have realised that whether it is spoken or
written, it has structure, and that it is not a hotchpotch of randomly distributed
elements. Instead, the linguistic ingredients that language is made up of are arranged
in accordance with a set of rules. This set of rules we call the grammar of a language.
Grammar is a vast domain of inquiry and it will be necessary to limit ourselves to a
subdomain. In this part of the module we will only be concerned with the part of
grammar that concerns itself with the structure of sentences. This is called syntax.
The question is; how can we go about describing the structure of sentences? Well,
before we can even start, we will need to specify what we mean by ‗sentence‘. This is
not as straightforward a question as it may seem, and linguists have come up with a
variety of definitions. In this module, we will say that a sentence is a string of words
that begins in a capital letter and ends in a full stop, and is typically used to express a
state of affairs in the world. This definition is not without problems, but will be
sufficient for present purposes. Let‘s now see what kinds of issues syntax deals with.
First of all, one of the principal concerns of syntax is the order of words. In English
we cannot string words into a sentence randomly. For example, we can have (1), but
not (2) or (3):
[44]
2. *The President a doughnut ate.
3. *doughnut President the ate a.
NB: An asterisk (*) placed before a sentence indicates that it is not a possible
structure in English.
Learning Outcomes:
Etymologically, the word syntax is of the Greek origin – syn-taxis - which means ―the
putting together in order, arranging (tying together)‖ or ‗arrangement.‘ Thus, syntax is
defined as the study of the arrangement of words in sentences and of the means by
which such relationships are shown (Hartmann & Stork 1972: 231). Syntax, therefore,
concerns itself with the meaningful organization of words into larger units such as
phrases, clauses, sentences & the analysis of such units. In this case, the sentence is
usually taken as the largest unit amenable (friendly) to meaningful linguistic analysis.
We can safely say, syntax is the level of linguistic analysis which deals with the
arrangement of words and morphemes into sentences and states the rules/principles
which govern such arrangements.
The syntax of a language describes the various ways in which words of a language
may be strung together to form sentences.
Note that these words are arranged in a certain/particular order based on the rules that
govern language and not just any how. e.g.
[45]
5.2 The main concerns of syntax
The manner in which words are combined to form various types of sentences is
orderly, and based on rules. We thus note that the syntactic component of the
grammar is both creative and systematic. Creativity accounts for the ability of the
native speakers to combine words in acceptable ways, forming sentences that they
have neither heard nor seen before. Systematicity refers to the predictability of the
structures formed as grammatical or ungrammatical by speakers of that language.
Pattern and rule governed constructions.
Theories of syntax are commonly grouped into two broad types – formal and
functional.
[46]
5.4.1 Formalist theories
Formalism is an approach to the study of texts which focuses on their form and
structure and is often contrasted with a functional approach. The term is also used to
refer to a particular linguistic and literary movement, including Russian Formalism,
the proponents of which were interested in identifying the formal distinguishing
features of different literary genres. In linguistics, the term formalism is used in a
variety of meanings which relate to formal linguistics in different ways. It is in fact
synonymous with the grammatical model or syntactic model in common usage. The
formalists focus on the structural aspects the language. They stress the form, the
structural configuration of language. It is a method for analysing sentence structures
and it includes different methodologies of generative grammar which are designed to
produce grammatically correct strings of words.
Put clearly, formalists look upon language as a rule governed system. It is the rules
that are used to generate only grammatical structures. It is the rules that are used to
govern sentential organisation.
[47]
Formal theories of syntax tend to stress the linguistic form or structure to the
neglect of meaning.
Grammar (Rules) are conceptualised as an abstract precise system specifying
the acceptable strings of symbols (words) that make up language.
Syntax is looked upon as constituting an autonomous system.
Functional linguistics has been looked upon differently by different scholars. The
subsequent definitions are some among the many. Iscan, (2007 as cited in Vardar et
al., 1998) has defined Functional linguistics as the structural linguistics movement
that studies the elements of a language and their correlations in terms of their
functions, prioritising and privileging the function of communication in detecting and
assessing language facts, and striving to perform linguistic descriptions through this
concept. Functional linguistics emphasizes ―examining the elements of a language
system and the correlations of these elements in terms of their functions in
communication‖ (Rifat, 2000). Functionalist linguistics is an approach to the study of
language characterized by taking systematically into account the speaker's and the
hearer's side, and the communicative needs of the speaker and of the given language
community. Functionalism sees functionality of language and its elements to be the
key to understanding linguistic processes and structures. Functional theories of
language propose that since language is fundamentally a tool, it is reasonable to
assume that its structures are best tasks of conveying meaning and contextual
information. ―Functional‖ approaches take the idea that the main purpose of language
is communication and that grammars have in large part been shaped to reflect
communicative needs (Tomasello, 1998).
[48]
them do it, and on what basis do they make their choices? Functional linguistics
therefore holds that:
Language use is functional
The function of language is to make meanings
These meanings are influenced by social and cultural context in they are
exchanged
The process of using language is a semiotic process, a process of making
meaning by choosing
Syntax is organised to serve these functions.
Extremists within the functional theories of syntax deny the existence of
structure in syntax.
Four types of criteria are employed to set up word classes. These include; the
syntactic criterion (functional approach; that is, the type of structures in which they
can occur (or syntactic role the word plays in a sentence), morphological (form; the
type of affixes a word will take), morpho-syntactic (dealing with inflectional
morphology) and semantic criterion (to do with meaning the words express also
known as the notional approach). In this module, we deal only with the three and
exclude the morpho-syntactic criterion.
[Link] Nouns
Under meaning, noun is a word that denotes a person, a place and or thing. However,
this criterion is not adequate to be used in the classification of words as nouns because
it does not account for all words that are nouns. For example, abstract nouns have not
been accounted for. Such nouns as „beauty‟, ‗thought‘, do not name things but some
kind of quality and perception respectively.
[Link] Verbs
Under meaning, a verb is a word that denotes an action. From this definition, we note
that not all verbs are accounted for. Truth is that not all verbs denote action. Others
[49]
are non-dynamic or stative. So, to say a verb is a word that denotes action is to not
describe the verb appropriately. Such verbs as know, possess, hate and adore do not
necessarily denote an action that can be visible, and they have not been accounted for
in the definition of verb under meaning, but they are verbs. Thus, use of meaning to
classify words as verbs is inadequate because it leaves out those that do not denote
action, yet they are verbs. Read more on classification of verbs under meaning.
[Link] Nouns
A noun under form is a word that inflects for number (takes the plural). But not all
nouns inflect for number with the help of an affix – s as in boy + s = boys. Other
nouns inflect for number via internal (vowel) change (morphologically) as in man +
plural = men. So, classifying a noun under form as a word that inflects for number is
not adequate as has stated because nouns (irregular nouns) that do not take the – s for
plural are not accounted for, yet they are nouns.
[Link] Verbs
A verb under form is word that inflects for tense, that is taking the – ed to indicate
past tense as in talk + - ed = talked. However, a look at some verbs (irregular verbs)
shows that not all verbs inflect for tense in the same way. This would mean that those
[50]
(irregular verbs) have not been accounted for the classification of verbs as verbs under
form.
Function has to do with the syntactic role played by a given element in the sentence or
in a structure. Function is a more reliable criterion than form or meaning.
Sentences are not random collections of words, but strings of words which are
organised according to certain rules. It is the task of syntax to give an account of those
rules. We saw in the introduction that sentences can be analysed into subparts which
we would refer to as constituents. In this part of the module, we will look at how these
constituents function in the sentences of which they are a part.
Just as a reminder, it has been pointed out earlier that function is the most reliable
criterion for classifying words as nouns or as any other word. We begin discussing the
function criterion with the noun.
In a sentence, a noun functions as either subject or object. We can now extend the
number of roles a noun can play in a sentence. In terms of function, a noun plays a
number of roles. Consider again the subsequent sentences:
Subject:
As we can see, these sentences contain exactly the same words, but differ quite
radically in meaning. This meaning difference comes about as a result of the different
roles played by the various constituents. In 1 (a) and (b) distinct entities, namely the
cat and the rat respectively, carry out the action denoted by the word devoured. We
will call words that denote actions verbs.
We can now define the Subject of a sentence as the constituent that on the one hand
tells us who performs the action denoted by the verb (i.e. who is the Agent), and on
the other hand tells us who or what the sentence is about. So to find out what is the
Subject of a particular sentence we can ask ‗Who or what carried out the action
denoted by the verb?‘ and also ‗Who or what is this sentence about?‘ The answers to
these questions will pinpoint the Subject.
You should have noticed that in each of the sentences we have looked at so far the
referent of the Subject was indeed engaged in performing the action denoted by the
verb, and the Subject also indicated what the sentence was about. However, referents
of Subjects need not always be doing something. Consider the sentences (c) and (d).
(c) The girl with the red hat stood on the platform.
(d) This car stinks.
Although the italicised Subjects in (c) and (d) do have a relationship with their
Predicates, their referents cannot be said to be instigating any kind of action:
‗standing on a platform’ and ‗stinking‘ are not activities. What these sentences show,
then, is that Subjects can also precede stative Predicates.
The Predicates we have encountered up to now, by contrast, were dynamic. Note here
that our initial definition of the notion Subject turns out to be problematic in another
respect: in addition to the referent of a Subject sometimes not performing any kind of
action, Subjects can be elements that are meaningless, and cannot therefore be said to
tell us what the sentences of which they are the Subject are about Consider the
following:
The element it in 1 (e) and (f) is often called weather it, because it is used in
expressions which tell us about the weather. It is also called non-referential it. This
second term brings out the important fact that this element does not refer to anything
in the way that referential it in (i) does:
Here it refers back to the string of words my hat which in its turn refers to a concrete
object in the real world.
There in sentences (g) and (h) is called existential there because it is used in
propositions that have to do with existence. Existential there should be kept apart
from locative there which, as the name implies, specifies a location, as in (j):
Non-referential it and existential there are said to be meaningless because all they
seem to be doing in the sentences in which they occur is fill the Subject slot. It would
be odd to say that it and there tell us what (e) – (h) are about.
What emerges from (c)–(h) is that although our earlier (semantic) definition of
Subject is practical and useful, we must use it only as a general guideline. If we want
to define the notion Subject more precisely, we will need to do so in structural terms,
i.e. in terms of syntactic configurations.
Direct Object
[53]
(d) My sister found this book.
The Subjects of these sentences are the first NPs in each case: his girlfriend, that silly
fool, our linguistics lecturer and my sister. The Predicates are bought this computer,
broke the teapot, took this photograph and found this book. The Predicators are
bought, broke, took and found.
We now assign the function of Direct Object to the NPs this computer, the teapot,
this photograph and this book.
How can we characterise the notion Direct Object? In semantic terms Direct Objects
are said to be constituents that refer to entities that undergo the activity or process
denoted by the verb. In 2 (a) the referent of the NP this computer undergoes a buying
activity; in (b) the referent of the NP the tea pot undergoes a breaking process, in (c)
the referent of this photograph undergoes a picture-taking process, and, finally, in (d)
the referent of this book undergoes a process of being found.
The characterisation of Direct Objects given is in terms of the kind of role they play in
sentences: in the same way that Subjects typically play an agentive (i.e. instigator)
role, Direct Objects have a Patient role (though of course not in the medical sense!).
As we have just seen, what this means is that the referent of the constituent that we
can identify as Direct Object typically undergoes the action or process denoted by the
verb. However, although this semantic characterisation is useful, and in most cases
enables us to find the Direct Object of a sentence, we will also need to define DOs
syntactically, i.e. in terms of their structural properties.
So what can we say about the structural properties of Direct Objects? Well, like
Subjects, DOs are often Noun Phrases (though not exclusively, as we will see later).
Secondly, their usual position, as in 2 (a) – (d) show, is after the main verb. Thirdly,
Direct Objects have a strong relationship with the verb that precedes them.
In this section we will be looking at a further type of verbal Complement; the indirect
Object (IO). This is yet another syntactic role of noun in a sentence. The indirect
object answers the question to whom?, to what?, for whom?, or for what? In the
subsequent sentences the IOs have been italicized and are in bold:
[54]
(a) We gave the boys the CDs
(b) The publisher sent her a copy of the book.
(c) Mr. Jimaima lent the student a book.
(d) My father always told us stories.
(e) Mutale bought Chileshe a car.
When we discussed Subjects and Direct Objects in the previous sections we saw that
Subjects typically have the role of Agent, and that Direct Objects typically have the
role of Patient/Undergoer. In 3 (a) – (e), the typical role associated with the italicised
Indirect Objects is Goal/Receiver or Beneficiary. Notice that (a) – (e) also contain
Direct Objects, namely the phrases the CDs, a copy of the book, the student and
stories. Verbs that take a Direct Object and an Indirect Object are called ditransitive
verbs. Apart from their semantic properties, Indirect Objects have a number of
syntactic characteristics.
Firstly, they are usually Noun Phrases. Secondly, they cannot occur without a
following Direct Object. Compare the sentences in 3 (a)-(e) with those in (f)–(i): if we
leave out the Direct Objects, the sentences become ungrammatical.
Of course, (f)–(i) are possible, but only if we interpret the NPs following the verbs as
Direct Objects. We need to state here that it is possible for IO to precede the DO as in
(i) and (j) or come after the DO in the sentence as in (j) and (m).
[55]
A subject complement is a word or phrase that follows a linking verb and identifies or
describes the subject. We wish to state that a linking verb (copula verb) is that verb
which is used to link the subject to a new identity or description. The new identity or
description is what is called the subject complement. Put simply, a verb that is a
copular is sometimes called a copulative or copular verb. Common examples of
linking verbs are to be, to become, to appear, to feel, to look, to smell, and to taste.
Before we may lose it, it is important to state here that a complement may be a noun,
pronoun or adjective.
In the subsequent sentences the subject complements have been italicized and in bold.
In 4 (e), ―professor‖ is a noun and the predicate nominative while ―friendly‖ in (f) is
an adjective and the predicate adjective.
[56]
(a) The music makes me happy.
(b) Zulu dyed his hair pink.
(c) They elected my uncle mayor.
(d) Mkosa considers Ngamanya a friend.
Note that ―happy‖ in (a) and ―pink‖ in (b) are adjectives. They are describing direct
objects me and hair respectively. Therefore, their functions are to describe the direct
objects. ―Mayor‖, in (c) and ―a friend‖ in (d) on the other hand nouns and are
therefore re-naming the objects uncle and Ngamanya respectively.
Vocative Case
The vocative case is a word or a phrase that is used to address someone directly,
usually in the form of a personal name, title or endearment (i.e., to show or indicate
that you are talking to someone or something directly). In English, words (the
addressee‘s name) used in the vocative case are offset using commas. Examples in 6
(a)-(d), the italicized and bold entities demonstrate the vocative case.
Note that cases where there is failure to use vocative case gives rise to ambiguity.
Consider (e) the correct one and (f), the ambiguous one.
There are some Key takeaways from vocative case that should be common to all.
Firstly, it must be known that when you are addressing someone directly, you are
using the vocative case. Secondly, when you write a sentence with direct address, you
set off the name with vocative commas. Thirdly, note that in speech, the vocative case
is indicated by intonation, meaning that an utterance is usually accented or
empahasised.
Appositive
[57]
In grammar, an appositive noun is a noun or noun phrase that follows another in
apposition to it, that is, it provides further information that defines or identifies it. The
bonus facts that define the other are framed by a comma. Put simply, appositives are
two nouns that work together, where one identifies or further defines the other. An
appositive can come before or after the main noun, and it can be at the beginning,
middle or end of a sentence. It has to sit beside the noun it defines. The sentences in 7
(a)-(d) are examples of the appositive.
(a) "The boy, an avid sprinter, raced ahead to the finish line."
(b) The best student in the intake, Lulia received an award.
(c) They couldn't believe it when the little boy stood up to John, the biggest
bully in school
(d) The spider, a big and hairy creature, scared the children as they played in
the park.
You may wish to know here that appositives are of two types; restrictive and non-
restrictive. A restrictive appositive provides information essential to identifying the
phrase in apposition. It limits or clarifies that phrase in some crucial way, such that
the meaning of the sentence would change if the appositive were removed. In English,
restrictive appositives are not set off by commas. The sentences in (e) and (f) use
restrictive appositives.
(e) My friend Chris Malakwa likes baked beans. – I have many friends, but I
am restricting my statement to the one named Chris Malakwa.
(f) He likes the television show The Oxygen of Democracy. – There are many
television shows, and he likes that particular one – The Oxygen of
Democracy.
[58]
(g) Chris Malakwa, my friend, likes baked beans. – The fact that Chris is my
friend is not necessary to identify him.
(h) I visited Canada, a beautiful country. – The appositive (a beautiful
country) is not needed to identify Canada.
It is important to note at this point that the same phrase can be a restrictive appositive
in one context and a non-restrictive appositive in another. Consider sentences (i) and
(j).
(i) My brother Inambao is here. – Restrictive: I have several brothers, and the
one named Inambao is here.
(j) My brother, Inambao, is here. – Non-restrictive: I have only one brother
and, as an aside, his name is Inambao.
5.5.4 Activity
1. Describe and exemplify the different syntactic roles played by the noun
in the sentence.
2. How would you distinguish an object complement from a subject
complement?
3. Form and meaning as criteria to be used in the classification of words as
nouns, verbs, adverbs and adjectives are inadequate. With tangible
examples from your readings, substantiate the authenticity of this
assertion.
5.6 Conclusion
The unit has introduced syntax and its concerns. Introduced also are criteria of word
classification and syntactic roles of the noun. We hope you have gained insight on
what syntax is.
5.7 Summary
This unit has discussed syntax and concerns of syntax. Theories to the study of syntax
have also been looked upon. Dealt with also in the unit are criteria of word
classification and functions of nouns in the sentence.
[59]
UNIT SIX: THE VERB
6.0 Introduction
This unit introduces you to the verb. The unit describes what the verb is and discusses
verb types and the function of the verb. It is hoped that you will pay particular
attention what the unit discusses.
Learning Outcomes:
A verb is a word used to describe an action, state, or occurrence, and forming the
main part of the predicate of a sentence, such as hear, become, happen and so on. As
pointed out earlier, meaning is not a reliable criterion in classifying words as verbs.
Much of what shall be discussed in the unit therefore, shall concentrate on function.
6.2 Form
This is a more reliable criterion in classifying words as verbs. Under form, any word
which inflects for tense is a verb. Examples (a) - (b) demonstrate this.
In terms of position, a verb is a word, in a sentence, which can link the subject to the
predicate. The predicate is the word or group of words which comes after the verb as
in (c) - (e)
[60]
6.4 Function
In terms of function, a verb always functions as verb. That is; indicating an action,
event or state of being as well as linking the subject with the predicate.
There are two types of verb: lexical or main verbs and auxiliaries. Lexical verbs are
those which carry the full dictionary meaning. Auxiliaries do not carry full dictionary
meaning and are split into Primary and Modal verbs. Examples of Primary are (have,
do, be, was, has, is). Modal verbs include; (may, can, could, would, might, will,
should shall). Auxiliaries like is, does and have can be used as lexical verbs as in (f) –
(h).
(f) He is sick
(g) He does the work well
(h) I have a headache
Lexical verbs convey semantic (or lexical) meaning in a sentence. Lexical verbs are
divided into dynamic (which refer to actions, process or sensation) and stative or non-
dynamic (which do not refer to actions). Since we are quite familiar with dynamic
verbs we will not dwell on them. Let us proceed and look at stative verbs. Stative
verbs are used primarily to describe a state or situation and are sub-classified into:
Verbs of being identify who or what a noun is, was, or will be. Although in English
most being verbs are forms of to be (am, are, is, was, were, will be, being, been),
other verbs (such as become, seem, appear) can also function as verbs of being.
Others include: sound, mean, own, possess, belong to, consist of, comprise, contain,
include, involve, hold, concern, depend on, apply to/for, deserve, cost, owe, weigh,
resemble.
Note that stative verbs do not take the progressive aspect. If they do they become
dynamic as in:
Involuntary verbs refer to actions that happen independent of one‘s will, not done by
one‘s choice or done unwillingly. These verbs include: hear, see, notice, feel, smell,
taste. These also do not take the progressive aspect. When they do they become
dynamic. Consider sentences (k) – (m).
(k) The doctor is seeing the patients.
(l) He is tasting the relish for salt.
(m) He was carefully feeling the object when it exploded.
Literally, mental refers to anything related to mind or intellectual process and Verbs
are words which show actions. Therefore, Mental Verbs refer to cognitive (that deals
with logic) state in which actions are mostly abstract. These Verbs give meaning
which is mostly unsuitable for outside evaluation as they are not so concrete actions.
However, we can evaluate these types of verbs through our knowledge. Mental Verbs
provide meanings which are connected with our sensory capabilities, deciding,
understanding and planning. Included in this verb type are: believe, agree, understand,
doubt, know, think, forget, and remember. These also do not take the progressive.
When they do they become dynamic as in:
(n) He is thinking about her.
(o) I am doubting the truth of her statement.
This type of verbs include adore, care, mind, matter, prefer, detest, dislike, hate, love,
want, wish. Like all other stative verbs these do not take the progressive aspect. When
they do they become dynamic as in:
[62]
6.6 Classification of Lexical Verbs
In grammar, a Monotransitive verb is a verb that takes only a direct object. Other
literature argues that a Monotransitive verb is one that takes two arguments: a subject
and a single direct object. Some examples of this verb type are: bite, break, get, kick,
kill as in:
In grammar, bitransitive or ditransitive verbs are verbs with two arguments in addition
to the subject: a ―recipient‖ or ―addressee‖ argument, and a ―theme‖ argument. Put
simply, Bitransitive verbs take two objects, one direct and the other indirect. Typical
bitransitive verb meanings are ‗give‘, ‗sell‘, ‗bring‘, ‗tell‘. Since different bitransitive
verbs occur in different constructions in many languages, only a single verb meaning
was taken into account for this chapter: the verb ‗give‘, which is probably the most
frequent bitransitive verb in all languages.
[63]
(x) Mwaka gave Mweshi a book.
(y) Ngenda told us stories.
(z) Vwambanji sold Mulenga a phone.
The adjective or noun phrase that qualifies or renames the object that appears before it
is sometimes called an object predicate or object predicative. Consider the following
sentences.
Intensive means to focus on one thing; in this case, the subject. The words or phrases
following an intensive verb work as the subject complement. This means they apply
to the subject, not the verb. Examples: ―Rose is a student‖ – The focus of this
sentence is Rose and what she is. Put simply, an intensive verb is usually called a
linking or copula verb – one which is used to describe the subject. Examples are verbs
like be, seem, appear, become. After the verb, we can use a noun, noun phrase or an
adjective or prepositional phrase as subject complement. To make it clearer, the
[64]
intensive verb takes no object, but takes either a subject complement as in the case of
the verb is and become or an adverbial (prepositional phrase) as in the case of stay
and live. Consider the subsequent sentences.
Verbs are also classified into finite and non-finite. Finite verbs are those which inflect
for tense or can inflect for tense in the context in which they are used. In addition to
showing tense, these verbs also show person and number. Non-finite verbs on the
other hand are those which do not inflect for tense in the context in which they are
used. Typically, they are infinitives with or without to. These include: the bare
infinitive, the to-infinitive (full infinitive) and the participial. This section deals with
non-finite verbs. Consider the subsequent examples of these verbs.
6.7.1 The Bare or Zero Infinitive
This is the base form of the verb, one without to. It is used as the main verb and can
appear after the verb do or most modal auxiliary verbs like should, can, will etc. the
bare infinitive may also be used with common verbs of perception after the object
(watch, hear, feel, see) and common verbs of permission or causation (make, have,
let)
This is also referred to as the full infinitive-one which is preceded by the word to. It is
important to note that the full infinitive is used I sentences to perform certain
[65]
functions – to express purpose, as a noun phrase, as an adjective, or as adverb.
Consider the following examples in:
(ll) You need to exercise regularly to lose weight (in order to lose weight)
(mm) To err is human. (to err is a noun phrase - subject)
(nn) I intended to marry her. (to marry is a noun phrase - object)
(oo) This is the game to watch. (to watch is an adjective, modifying the
noun game)
(pp) Handili is ready to go. (to go is an adverb, modifying the adjective
ready)
This is formed by adding the –ing to the present form of the verb. This is as
exemplified in the sentences…
(qq) Removing his glasses, the professor shook his head with
disappointment.
(rr) Rising out of the sea before us, the sun started to warm our face.
[66]
(tt) Having signed the document, Chingi felt the weight of responsibility lift
from his shoulders.
[Link] The Past (–ed) participial
This is formed by adding the –ed to the present form of the verb. The subsequent
examples demonstrate this.
6.7.5 Conclusion
In the unit, you were exposed to the verb. You have learnt about the role of the verb in
the sentence and you have also how it assumes other labels as it used in different
situations. It is hoped that you have gained mystery of the verb and that you will use
the web to learn more about the verbs and be able to identify and use them
appropriately.
6.7.6 Summary
The unit has looked at the verb is and various types of verb and how they are used. In
addition, words that look like verbs have been looked at in the unit and we hope this
will not confuse you anymore.
[67]
UNIT SEVEN: THE ADJECTIVE
7.0 Introduction
This unit exposes you to adjectives. The unit explores what adjectives are, the types,
form, their distribution and their role in sentences.
Learning Outcomes
On the basis of meaning, and adjective is a word which modifies the state or quality
of a noun. An adjective may also describe the quantity of nouns.
In this position, adjectives appear before the noun being described as earlier stated.
They attribute a quality or characteristic to the noun as in a small boy, a charming
lady, a huge aeroplane. Consider other examples in (a) – (b) show this pattern.
[68]
(b) A charming lady.
7.2.2 Predicative position
An adjective may also come after the noun – predicative as alluded to earlier. In this
case the adjective functions as subject complement if it comes after the noun
functioning as subject and after the linking verb (copula verb) as in: The woman is
beautiful. In the predicative position, the adjective may also function as object
complement if it comes after the noun functioning as object as in: Lulia considered
Handili intelligent. Additional examples of the predicative nature of adjectives are as
shown in (c) - (e).
[69]
7.3 Function
7.4 Complementation
A preposition phrase consists of a preposition and the object of the preposition, for
example, ―…in Florida.‖ In this prepositional phrase (…in Florida), ―in‖ is the
preposition and ―Florida‖ is the object of the preposition or what the preposition is
referring to. Basically, prepositional phrases provide further information about a
sentence. However, when dealing with adjective complements, prepositional phrases
provide further information about the adjective in the sentence. Common prepositions
include: about, at, from, by, of, in, to, with. See some examples in (n) - (p).
The to-infinitive
[70]
English is ‗TO + V1‟ form (base form) of a verb that functions as a noun, adjective, or
adverb. An infinitive phrase has an Infinitive and its object, or modifier, or both. Note
that when an infinitive phrase functions as an adjective complement, it talks about the
reason for the adjective (state).
We clarify the foregoing point in the sentence “I am happy to see you again”.
‗to see you again’ is an infinitive phrase that‘s coming next to the adjective ‗happy‘
and telling us the reason for this state of existence. It completes the meaning of the
adjective by telling us why the speaker is happy. If it were not there, we would not
know why the speaker is happy. This completely changes the meaning of the
sentence. Consider the examples in (q) - (s).
In the given sentence, the noun clause ―that she is angry with us‖ is giving more
information about the adjective ‗evident‘ and telling us what is evident. It actually
should not be called a noun clause here as it is functioning as a noun; it is functioning
as a modifier: giving information about an adjective. For more practice, look at the
examples in (t) - (w).
(t) It is shocking how Jane survived the accident.
(u) Tina is happy that she is back home.
(v) We were shocked when Chikondi came back to our team.
(w) They not are certain whether or not they have made the right decision.
[71]
7.5 Activity
7.6 Conclusion
In this unit, you have read about adjectives and their importance in grammar. You
surely must have seen how clarity is enhanced when adjectives are used as
descriptors. We hope you found the unit interesting and insightful. Now look out for
other adjectives and see if you can use them in the same way they have discussed in
the unit.
7.7 Summary
The unit has discussed adjectives: what they are and the positions they occupy in
sentences. Not only that, the unit has clearly dealt with how they interact with nouns
in describing them. Explained further in the unit is complementation. That is the types
of complements adjectives take. The unit has stated that complements that adjectives
can take are: prepositional phrases, the to-infinitive and the noun clause.
[72]
UNIT EIGHT: THE ADVERB
8.0 Introduction
This unit introduces adverbs to you. The unit states what adverbs are, what they show,
when and where they occur in sentences. Our hope is that you will pay particular
attention as you read through the unit in order to gain mastery.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this unit, you should be able to:
Identify different types of adverb in context
State what is meant by adverb
Describe the syntactic role of adverbs in sentences
Describe and exemplify when and where adverbs occur in sentences
An adverb is a word that is used to change, modify or qualify several types of words
including an adjective, a verb, a clause, another adverb, or any other type of word or
phrase, with the exception of determiners and adjectives that directly modify nouns. A
good way to understand adverbs is to think about them as the words that provide
context. Specifically, adverbs provide a description of how, where, when, in what
manner and to what extent something is done or happens. See the examples in (a) -
(d).
[73]
8.2 Distribution of Adverbs in Sentences
The positions of adverbs are not a fixed or set thing. As you have seen, adverbs can
appear in different position in a sentence. However, there are some rules that help us
decide where an adverb should be positioned. The rules will be different depending on
whether the adverb is acting to modify an adjective or another adverb, a verb or what
type of adverb it is. Positional adverb examples in the following sentences are in bold
for easy identification.
These adverbs will usually be placed before the adjective or adverb being modified.
Look at the examples in (e) - (g).
(e) We gave them a really tough match. (The adverb really modifies the
adjective tough).
(f) It was quite windy that night. (The adverb quite modifies the
adjective windy).
(g) We don‘t go to the movies terribly often. (The adverb terribly modifies
the adverb often).
The position of the adverb in this situation can be a bit tricky because, it will depend
on the type of adverb; whether of place, position, time etc. – and there are many
exceptions to the rules. However, a basic set of guidelines is shown below:
Adverbs of manner or place are usually positioned at the end of the sentence as shown
in (h) - (k).
The adverb is of definite time it will be placed at the end of the sentence. See
examples in (l) - (n).
[74]
(l) I did it yesterday.
(m) We can discuss it tomorrow.
(n) Let‘s go to Paris next week.
However, if it is an indefinite period of time, it will go between the subject and main
verb as in (o) - (q).
Adverbs may also appear after an intransitive verb, or object or complement as in (t) -
(v).
8.3. Adverbials
These are words or groups of words (not adverbs) which can occupy the adverb slot
in a sentence and convey the same meaning as a single adverb. Adverbials can take
the following forms as in (w) - ().
Noun Phrase
8.3.1 Adjuncts
Clarifying further, "[A]djunct (-ival) [is a] term used in grammatical theory to refer
to an optional or secondary element in a construction: an adjunct may be removed
without the structural identity of the rest of the construction being affected. The
clearest examples at sentence level are adverbials, e.g. John kicked the
ball yesterday instead of John kicked the ball, but not *John kicked yesterday, etc.;
but other elements have been classed as adjunctival, in various descriptions, such
as vocatives and adjectives. Many adjuncts can also be analyzed as modifiers,
attached to the head of a phrase (as with adjectives, and some adverbs)." (David
Crystal, A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics Blackwell, 1997). Consider
examples in (ff) - (ii).
[76]
(hh) She readily loaned the money (She loaned the money)
(ii) I drove the car very slowly. (I drove the car)
8.3.2 Disjuncts
People, as stated by Crystal (2004: 229), often wish to make a comment or express an
attitude about what they say or the way they are saying it. An important role in this
regard is played by a type of adverbials called disjuncts. Some disjuncts convey the
speaker's comment about what is being said and others, comment on the truth or value
of a clause or sentence. Disjuncts may be words or phrases or clauses. Most disjuncts
are seen by Quirk (1989) to be prepositional phrases or clauses as shown in (jj) - (kk).
Disjuncts are words that comment on the content, behavior, or manner of the content
within the text. Put simply, they are adverbs and adverbials which do not relate to any
individual element of the sentence but state or present the speaker‘s position or
attitude. See (ll) - (mm)
(ll) Do it now. (Ordinary adverb)
(mm) Now this is the story. (Sentence adverb)
Nash (1986) also confirms this fact and adds that Disjuncts are defined as being
parenthetical, i.e. not integrated within the clause whose meaning they qualify. He
gives the following examples to compare the use of "amazingly" as an adverb in the
first example and as a disjunct in the second:
[77]
8.3.3 Types of Disjuncts
As classified by Crystal (2004), disjuncts are divided into two major types which are
furthermore sub classified into other groups: Style Disjuncts and Content Disjuncts.
Style Disjuncts are divided into two categories; Modality and Manner and Respect
convey the speaker's comment about the style or form of what is being said -
expressing the conditions under which the listener should interpret the sentence.
Greenbaum & Quirk (1991) give the following example to compare (pp) & (pp).
Respect Disjuncts
[78]
Frequently, respect disjuncts can come in the form of longer phrases or clauses. See
(ww)…
(ww) Generally speaking, the rainy season has already begun by September.
To mean;
If I may say so/with respect, none of you are competent to make the legal
judgment required
For some adverb phrases, Quirk, et al (1985), as style disjunct, there is a sense
corresponding to them in other structure. For example, in place of "frankly" in: (xx).
We could use:
However, not every style disjunct will allow such a full range of structures.
Greenbaum & Quirk (1991) argue that Content Disjuncts (also called Attitudinal
Disjunct), are of two kinds; those that relate to certainty and those that relate to
evaluation. Content Disjuncts as explained by Quirk & Greenbaum (1989), convey
the speaker's comment on the content of what he is saying. They can generally appear
only in declarative clauses:
Eastwood (2000) agrees with Quirk, et al. (1985) in saying that the content disjuncts
like: "surprisingly", "fortunately", and "luckily" are possibly used to make an
"evaluation" and "comment" on what we are saying:
[79]
Content disjuncts can also be realized by prepositional phrases and clauses:
These disjuncts comment on the truth value of what is said, firmly endorsing it,
expressing doubt, or posing contingencies such as conditions or reasons. For example:
undoubtedly
(ccc) The play was apparently written by Francis Beaumont.
Perhaps
There are a number of aspects related to different meanings that disjunct adverbials
can convey the syntactic forms of disjuncts and their distribution in sentences. This is
in addition to presenting some syntactic functions and properties of these adverbials.
The following are the Semantic Categories as provided by Biber, et al. (2000).
It must be noted that other grammarians, like Alexander (1997), use other headings
for these groups. See the following as expressed in
[80]
(eee) I don't want you to repeat this: between ourselves, and in strict
confidence ·
(fff) It is just as I expected: characteristically, logically and typically.
[Link] Syntactic Realizations (forms) of Disjuncts
Disjuncts, Biber, et al. (2000) argue, are realized by a variety of syntactic forms. The
forms are exemplified in
Disjuncts are words that comment on the content, behavior, or manner of the content
within the text. Put simply, they are adverbs and adverbials which do not relate to any
individual element of the sentence but state or present the speaker‘s position or
attitude.
Conjunct Adverbials, as defined by Crystal (2004), are a class of words whose main
function is to link independent grammatical units, such as clauses, sentences and
paragraphs; for example meanwhile, however and otherwise. In traditional grammar
these words were called adverbs. In general, conjuncts are adverbials that introduce
link between the sentence they occur in and what has already been said, i.e. the
[81]
preceding context. They are necessary to maintain cohesion and coherence in both
speech and writing.
Biber et al (2000), state that conjuncts are important devices for creating textual
cohesion as they express the type of connection between clauses. They are more
peripheral to the rest of the clause structure in which they occur than Adjuncts
adverbials and they do not form part of the sentence. They have a more primary
connective function rather than adding additional information to the clause. They
share some characteristics with Disjunctive in that they are mobile and often
prosodically and orthographically separated from the rest of the clause, moreover they
cannot be elicited by question forms. Conjuncts adverbials should be distinguished
from coordinators. They are adverbials whose function is to connect units of discourse
of different size (sentences, units larger than sentences or to-clause) to a preceding
main clause
[Link] Summation:
These include: in sum, altogether, then, to conclude, overall, in conclusion, and to
summarize.
[Link] Apposition:
These include: which is to say, in other words, i.e., that is, for example, and e.g.
[Link] Result/Inference:
These include: therefore, consequently, thus, as a result, so, hence, in that case,
otherwise, then and in consequence.
[Link] Contrast/Concession: These include: on the other hand, in contrast,
alternatively, though, anyway, yet, conversely and after all
[Link] Transition:
[82]
These include, as stated by Greenbaum & Quirk (1991), Discourse, e.g. incidentally,
by the way, and now and Temporal types, e.g. meanwhile, meantime, originally,
subsequently and eventually.
The two registers: conservation and academic prose are considered, by Biber, et al.
(2000), as related to the most frequent use of conjuncts. Corpus findings show that:
In both conservation and academic prose, the majority of conjuncts are realized by
"Single Adverbs".
In conversation, almost all conjuncts are "Single Adverbs". The most common of
these are so, then, anyway and though.
In academic prose, "Prepositional Phrases" are also common as conjuncts.
Note that Disjuncts and conjuncts are also called sentence adverbials.
[83]
(nnn) The meeting will be upstairs.
(ooo) They drove to the farm.
8.5.4 Degree
These either heighten or lower the intensity of the segment which they modify as in
(sss) - (ttt).
(sss) Jesus is definitely going to come.
(ttt) We nearly missed the lecture.
8.7 Conclusion
In this unit, you have been exposed to adverbs and their grammatical function. You
surely must have seen how clarity is enhanced when adverbs are used in sentences. It
is hoped that you found the unit interesting and insightful. The topic on adverbs is so
wide and what has been covered here is only meant to help you have a basis for
further exploration.
[84]
8.8 Summary
The unit has discussed adverbs: what they are and the positions they occupy in
sentences. Not only that, the unit has clearly dealt with how they interact with other
word classes in modifying them. Explained further in the unit are the types or classes
of adverbs and their roles in sentences. The unit has also dealt with adverbials –
adjuncts, disjuncts and conjuncts, bringing out their syntactic role in grammar. Read
further on these because they have not been exhaustively dealt with.
[85]
UNIT NINE: PHRASES
9.0 Introduction
This unit introduces phrases to you. Phrases play a significant role in grammar and
have to be mastered as required. There are several kinds of phrases but this unit and
module considers only the common types. And so, the unit shall deal with each of the
common types and provide detail. It is hoped that you will pay attention as you
familiarise with this unit.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this unit, you should be able to:
Describe what a phrase is
Identify various types of phrases
Identify the form of each types of phrases
Discuss functions of the different kinds of phrases
The phrase has been looked upon differently by different scholars. We thus draw
some definitions from a few sources. You can expand your knowledge by consulting
other literature on the phrase. In English grammar, a phrase is a group of two or more
words functioning as a meaningful unit within a sentence or clause. A phrase is
commonly characterized as a grammatical unit at a level between a word and a clause.
Richard, et al. (1985:39) said that ―a phrase is a group of word which forms a
grammatical unit, a phrase does not contains a finite verb and does not have a subject-
predicate structure‖.
A phrase is, as Crystal (1992) defines it, ―an element of structure typically containing
more than one word, but lacking the subject-predicate structure usually found in a
[86]
clause.‖ Finch (1999), in his definition of ‗phrase‘, states ―a phrase is a syntactic unit
which typically consists of more than one word and is intermediate between word and
clause level in sentences.‖ He adds that in a phrase words go together to form a
‗single syntactic entity‘ which can be moved ‗around‘ and also substituted by another
word. As an illustration, he gives the following example in which the words italicised
and in bold are capable of both movement (as in (a) & (b)) and substitution as in (c):
‗Form‘, on the one hand, refers to the internal structure of the grammatical unit and in
the case of phrases, the form of a phrase is determined by the word which has a
primary and obligatory function within it. This word is referred to as the head of that
phrase. Function on the other hand, refers to the syntactic role that a phrase plays
within a sentence or a clause. Thus, we distinguish five kinds of phrases in this unit.
Prastowo, Panca (2009:65) assumes that there are eight types of phrases, they are:
noun phrase, verb phrase, adjective phrase, adverbial phrase, prepositional phrase,
infinitive phrase, gerundive phrase, and participle phrase. However, as stated in the
introduction, in this module we shall only deal with the common types of phrases, but
you are encouraged to study the other types that will not be covered here. The
common types of phrases include noun phrases such as: (a good friend), verb phrases
(drives carefully), adjective phrases (very cold and dark), adverb phrases (quite
slowly), and prepositional phrases (in first place). We start with the noun phrase (NP).
The main word in a noun phrase is a noun or a pronoun. There are a number of
subclasses of noun and pronouns that will be discussed later. The structure of typical
noun phrase may be represented schematically in the following way.
Note that determiners when used introduce the noun phrase. Modifiers are units that
are dependent on the main word and can be omitted. There are two modifiers, pre-
modifiers (come before the noun) and post modifiers (come after the noun). The
subsequent are examples of possible structures of noun phrases.
Noun books
Determiner + noun those books
Pre-mod + noun history books
Determiner + pre-mod + noun some long books
Noun + post-mod books about Canada
Determiner + noun + post-mod some books on astronomy
Pre-mod + noun + post-mod popular books on psychology
Det + pre-mod + noun + post-mod some popular books on astronomy
[88]
We at this point turn to some of the syntactic roles or functions of the noun phrase in
the sentence or clause. You will note that the noun phrase has the same syntactic roles
as those of a single noun. To understand the functions of the noun phrase therefore,
make as close reference as possible to the functions of the noun as discussed in unit
five. Rather, study the two alongside each other. The following are some of the roles
that a noun phrase would perform in sentences. As usual, the noun phrase is italicised
and is in bold.
[Link] Subject
We must by now know that the subject of the sentence is what the sentence is about.
That is true enough. More than that, it could be said to be said to be the noun that is
doing or being something. One point to underscore is that it is not always the case that
the subject noun phrase is always doing something. See (e) – (h). Note that (g) and (h)
demonstrate the fact that it is not always case that the subject is doing something.
(e) The people in the bus escaped through the emergency exit.
(f) A good friend does not count the number of times he visits.
(g) The window was broken by Simalimbu.
(h) The old woman is sick.
[Link] Direct object
The direct object is the entity that suffers the direct action of the verb. See (i) - (j).
We already know that the indirect object is the entity in the sentence which benefits
from the direct object consider examples in (i) - (j).
[89]
[Link] Subject Complement
Refer to unit five for details on subject complement and consider examples in as in (k)
- (l).
(m) The performance was a test of their physical endurance.
(n) Mabvuto‘s brother is a mortuary attendant.
[Link] Object Complement
Refer to unit five for information about the object complement and consider examples
as in (m) - (n).
The adjuncts here refer to a span of time within which, at some point of time, the
events took place. There are many different ways of expressing the notion of time?
When, how often, or how long. See examples in (o) - (p).
(q) I met her last year.
(r) The term finishes next week.
[Link] Complement of a preposition
Complement of a preposition or prepositional complements are defined as the word,
phrase, or clause that directly follows the preposition and completes the meaning of
the prepositional phrase. Prepositional complements are also called objects of
prepositions and complements of prepositions consider examples in (q) - (r).
[90]
Note that the noun phrase can take various forms. It can take the gerundial form, the
infinitive or the appositive. Details of these have been provided in the subsequent
section.
9.2.2 Gerundial
A gerund is a noun made from a verb root plus ing (a present participle). A whole
gerund phrase functions in a sentence just like a noun and can act as a subject, an
object, or a predicate nominative. A gerund phrase may include the gerund plus
modifiers and complements. See in (w) – (z).
Other examples of the infinitive noun phrase would include the following. Consider
(bb) - (dd).
(aa) To win a prize is my ambition.
(bb) He was told to dance like no one was watching.
(cc) He hopes to win the first prize.
[91]
9.2.4 The Appositive
In sentence (ee), the appositive ―my brother‖ renames Richard, thus identifying who
he is. In example (ff), the appositive ―a well-known lecturer‖ provides a description of
Dr. Kakoma. For further details on the appositive, refer to unit five on the function of
the noun.
To determine if a word or phrase is a modifier, one of the easiest tests is to see if the
larger segment (phrase, sentence, etc.) makes sense without it. If it does, the element
you're testing is probably a modifier. If it doesn't make sense without it, it's probably
not a modifier.
Modifiers that appear before the headword are called premodifiers. Modifiers that
appear after the headword are called postmodifiers. In some cases, modifiers can
modify other modifiers as well. In short, it is possible to have pre-modification or
post-modification in the noun phrase.
[92]
phrases, such as adjective clauses and adverbial phrases, also exist and tend to
describe adjectives and adverbs.
[Link] Pre-modification
[Link] Determiners
[Link] Adjectives
To remind yourself of what adjectives are refer to unit seven. Here we use them to
achieve pre-modification. Consider (ii) - (jj).
[Link] Participles
[93]
and so on, as burning, in a burning candle, or devoted in his devoted friend. See (kk)
- (ll).
(kk) Nyimbili likes boiled eggs.
(ll) Mukumbe has a number of irritating habits.
We are not defining the noun here is because the definition has already been given in
unit five. Please refer to the unit to refresh your memory. Here we show how pre-
modification in the noun phrase can be achieved through another noun. See is as
shown in (mm) - (oo). The pre-modifier is italicised and in bold.
[Link] Adverbs
As with the noun, the adverb has already been defined in unit eight. So refer to that unit for
definition. Here we discuss how the adverb is used as a pre-modifier in the noun phrase.
9.3 Post-modification
The prepositional phrase in (rr) is adjective while the one is (ss) is adverb in nature.
9.3.2 Adjectives
By now we know what adjectives are because we have met them before in unit seven.
And so, we will not go into the definition of the adjective. Refer to unit seven where
the adjective has been discussed. Here we only demonstrate how we can achieve post-
modification through the adjective. See examples in (tt) - (uu).
A relative clause is typically a clause that modifies a noun or noun phrase, and uses
some grammatical device to indicate that one of the arguments within the relative
clause has the same referent as that noun or noun phrase. For example, in the
sentence I met a man who slapped the school driver. When we say it is finite, it means
the verb in this clause inflects for tense or shows tense. See examples in (vv) - (ww).
(vv) The person who lives in this house has not been seen for days.
(ww) This is the place where I would like to live.
A non-finite clause in one whose verb does not inflect for tense or does not show
tense in the context it has been used. Non-finite clauses include the present participle,
the past participle and the to-infinitive as has been exemplified in (xx) - (zz).
9.3.5 Adverbs
Adverbs can as well be used to post-modify the noun phrase as has been shown in
(aaa) - (ccc).
[95]
(aaa) I requested for the way up.
(bbb) My children returned the morning after.
(ccc) Chikoye walked home alone.
This part of the unit introduces you to the verb phrase. The verb phrase is significant
in the syntactic structure and must be well mastered if you are to understand other
phrase with which it is used. It is important to note that the verb phrase will always
function as a verb in the sentence.
In terms of from, a verb phrase or verbal phrase is a phrase made up of a main verb
(MV) following a modal or one of the auxiliary verbs. Examples are: ‗walked‘, ‗can
see’ and ‗had been waiting.‘ The form of the verb phrase is that it is headed by a main
verb (MV) or Main Verb + an auxiliary as shown in (ddd) - (eee).
Like the single verb, the verb phrase may be either finite or non-finite. You will
notice that there is no difference with the single verb in each of these. See how these
are realise in the subsequent section.
The finite verb phrase is headed by a finite verb. A finite verb is the form of verb that
shows agreement with a subject and is marked for tense. See examples in (fff) - (ggg).
The non-finite verb phrase is headed by a Non-finite verb, the verb that does not
inflect for tense. This type of verb would be the bare infinitive, to-infinitive or the
participial. Consider the examples in (hhh) - (lll).
[96]
(hhh) I watched Mwaka sweep the house as fast as she could. (Bare infinitive)
(iii) The boys returned to help their lecturer. (To-infinitive)
(jjj) The waste basket sat in the corner, reeking with garbage. (-ing participial)
(kkk) Beaten beyond recognition, Mututwa was rushed to the hospital.
(-en participial)
(lll) Distressed by her lover, Mkosa vowed never to love again. (-ed
participial)
(mmm) She chose lemony yellow paint for her room. (Adjective)
(nnn) Inonge proposed an interesting trip. (Adjective)
(ooo) The scones smell deliciously sweet president. (Adjectival)
The subject complement is a well known element. If you wish to remind yourself,
refer to unit where adjectives have been discussed. See (ppp) - (qqq).
Object Complement
Refer to unit five for information on object complement and consider examples in
(rrr) - (sss)
[97]
(rrr) Students consider their lecturer brilliant.
(sss) The president makes the citizens happy.
An adverb phrase consists of one or more words. The adverb is the head of the phrase
and can appear alone or it can be modified by other words. In terms of function, the
adverb phrase can function as an adjunct of time, adjunct of manner, conjunct or
disjuncts as has been demonstrated in subsequent section.
Refer to [Link] for information on adjunct of time then consider examples (ttt) -
(uuu).
9.6.3 Conjunct
Conjuncts or Conjunctive adverbs are parts of speech that are used to connect one
clause to another. They are also used to show sequence, contrast, cause and effect, and
other relationships as in (xxx).
9.6.4 Disjunct
Refer to unit eight (8) for more information on disjuncts as in (yyy) - (zzz).
[98]
9.7 The Prepositional Phrase
9.7.1 Nouns
[99]
(aaj) They should have all arrived by now.
(aak) Mulenga travelled to Kasama by bus.
9.7.6 Adjective
9.8.1 Adjectival
We know what an adjectival is by now. To refresh our memory, we can simply say, it
is a word or group of words that occupies the slot of an adjective in a sentence and
plays the role of an adjective. See examples in (aan) - (aao).
9.8.2 Adverbial
In grammar, a verb complement is is a word, phrase, or clause that follows the verb to
add more information. Verb complements strengthen the meaning and impact of the
verb in a sentence. It is important to point out that only transitive verbs will have
complements. Verb complements may be the noun phrase, adjective, prepositional
phrase or an adverb as in (aar) - (aas).
[100]
(aas) We are looking at awful paintings
9.8.7 Activity
1. For each of the italicised and bold phrases in the sentences given
below:
State what type of phrase the item is.
State the head of the phrase.
State the grammatical function of the phrase.
[101]
9.8.8 Conclusion
In this unit, you have been exposed to phrases and their grammatical function. You
surely must have seen how clarity is enhanced when different phrases are used in
sentences. It is hoped that you found the unit interesting and insightful. The topic on
phrases is so wide and what has been covered here is only meant to help you have a
basis for further exploration.
9.9 Summary
The unit has discussed phrases: what they are and the positions they occupy in
sentences. Not only that, the unit has clearly dealt with how they interact with other
word classes in modifying them. We have learnt how phrases are made of individual
words and how all these words come together to perform one function. Explained
further in the unit are the types or classes of phrases and their roles in sentences. Read
further on these because they have not been exhaustively dealt with.
[102]
UNIT TEN: THE ENGLISH CLAUSE
10.0 Introduction
In this unit we look at the English clause. Discussed in the unit is the description of
the clause, clause patterns and functions. As you familiarise with this unit, ensure that
you master the clause patterns, clause elements, classification of clauses using the
function criterion.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of the unit, you should be able to:
State the three ways in which clauses are described.
State and illustrate each of the seven basic clause patterns.
State and type of verb by which each of the clause patterns is realised.
Distinguish between clauses with verbs and clauses without verbs.
Classify and sub-classify clauses on the basics of clause functions.
Distinguish between defining (restrictive) and non-defining (non-restrictive)
relative clauses.
A clause may be analysed or split into seven different clause elements. These are
subject (S), Verb (V), Complement (C), Adverbial (A), Object (O), Object
Complement (OC) and Subject Complement (SC).
The basic clause patterns differ from each other by the type of main verb in their verb
phrases, that is, their predicates. The verb types are differentiated from each other by
the functions and phrases they require to be present or to be absent in the VP.
[103]
The elements presented above give rise to seven basic clause patterns. The patterns
are determined by the verb classes to which the full verbs within the verb constituent
belong. The following are the seven patterns:
Formally, this pattern the noun phrase (NP) and verb phrase (VP) whose verb is
intransitive –one which does not take any object as in (a) - (b).
The SVOO pattern is realised through the bitransitive or ditransitive verb. The
Bitransitive verb is one which takes two objects, the direct object and the indirect
object. The direct object in some cases may appear before the indirect object or vice-
versa as in (e) - (f).
This pattern is realised through the Complex Transitive verb. This is the verb which
takes one object plus an object complement as in (g) - (h).
[104]
10.3.5 SVOA Pattern
The SVOA pattern is realised through the complex transitive verb –one which takes
one object plus a compulsory adverbial as in (i) - (j).
The SVC pattern is realised through the intensive verb –one which does not take any
object but takes a subject complement as has been shown in (k) - (l).
This pattern is realised through the intensive verb as well. In this case, however, the
verb takes an adverbial instead of a complement as in (m) - (n).
Under Use of Verb we look at whether the clause makes use of the verb or not, that is
to say whether the clause is + verb or – verb.
+ Verb clauses are sub-categorised into the finite and the non-finite clause.
These are clauses whose verb element is a finite verb phrase. Examples (o) - (p)
demonstrate these.
[105]
10.4.2 Non-Finite Clauses
These are clauses whose verb element is a non-finite verb phrase. There are two types
of non-finite clauses and these include the participial or participle and the infinitive.
The participle is subcategorised into the present and the past participle while the
infinitive is sub-divided into the to-infinitive and the bare infinitive.
[Link] Participial
[Link] To-infinitive
The to-infinitive (also known as the full infinitive) has been discussed earlier in this
module. But to refresh your memory, we here provide a simple definition of what it is.
Put simply, the to-infinitive is a verbal consisting of the word to plus a verb (in its
simplest "stem" form) and functioning as a noun, adjective, or adverb. The
term verbal indicates that an infinitive, like the other two kinds of verbals, is based on
a verb and therefore expresses action or a state of being. However, the infinitive may
function as a subject, direct object, subject complement, adjective, or adverb in a
sentence. Although an infinitive is easy to locate because of the to + verb form,
deciding what function it has in a sentence can sometimes be confusing. Consider the
examples in (u) - (y).
(u) To wait seemed foolish when decisive action was required. (subject)
(v) Everyone wanted to go. (direct object)
(w) His ambition is to fly. (subject complement)
(x) He lacked the strength to resist. (adjective)
(y) We must study to learn. (adverb)
[106]
[Link] Bare infinitive
The bare infinitive is the form of infinitive without 'to'. Sometimes it is referred to as
the base form of a verb. This is the verb‘s most basic form. For example, talk, sleep,
have, think and so on. Note that the bare infinitive is used in many ways in sentential
construction. It can be used as the main verb after the auxiliary verb do, or most
modal auxiliary verbs (z), (aa) after verbs of perception (bb), or common verbs of
permission or causation (cc) and can follow the question why (ee).
[107]
10.5.2 Omitted Subject Same as Subject of the Main Clause
These –Verb clauses have omitted subjects, but the omitted subject appears in the
main clause. This is as has been shown in (gg) - (hh).
(gg) Quite upset at the news, Mabvuto started strolling along the corridor.
(hh) Whether right or wrong, Mulenga always wins an argument.
The adjective or adjective verbless phrase is without a verb as the name states but
functions as modifiers as in (ii) - (jj).
Clauses are of different types and as such have different functions. In the subsequent
section, we look at clause types and their functions.
The most common nominal clauses are the that-clause and Wh-interrogative clauses.
These clauses are headed by nouns and function as nouns. They function as Subject
(S) Object (O) Subject Complement (SC) Adjectival Complement (AC) Appositive
(APP) and Prepositional Phrase (PC). We begin by highlighting that-clauses.
[108]
(kk) That he is honest is known to all. (S)
(ll) I suspect that Lulia eloped with her boyfriend. (O)
(mm) Your suggestion, that I leave on Tuesday, should be considered. (APP)
(nn) The lecturer is angry that all students arrived late. (AC)
(oo) The problem is that you think driving is not easy to learn. (SC)
This is a type of clause which has a nominal function, but which like many relative
clauses begins with a wh-word. The functions of a nominal relative clause include
those of subject, object, indirect object, subject complement, object complement,
appositive and prepositional complement as in (uu) - (aaa).
[109]
[Link] Nominal to-Infinitive Clauses
At this point, we are familiar with the concept of to-infinitive and as such, we are not
giving the definition of this syntactic unit. Of course we remind you of the fact that
being nominal, the syntactic role or functions in sentences are just the same as those
of a single noun. So, the functions are as indicated in (bbb) - (fff).
The ing- clause is the verbal that ends in the –ing and performs the functions as in
(ggg) - (kkk).
10.7 Conclusion
In this unit, you have been exposed to the English Clauses, their grammatical function
and the various types. You surely must have seen how their compositions affect their
functions. It is hoped that you found the unit interesting and insightful. The topic on
[110]
clauses is so wide and what has been covered here is only meant to help you have a
basis for further exploration. So, go on and read further aspects not covered here.
10.8 Summary
The unit has discussed English Clauses: the elements in their composition, the
different types and various clause functions. You are encouraged to read further on
these because they have not been exhaustively dealt with.
Using the function criterion, classify and sub-classify each of the underlined
clauses in each of the following sentences.
(a) I am confident that he will pass.
(b) He went to Lusaka to look for a job.
(c) He came to see me because he wanted some money.
(d) The accident was caused by the driver‘s drunkenness.
(e) The film was less interesting than we expected it to be.
Identify the pattern for each of the clauses given below and state the verb by
which the pattern is realised.
(a) Dumbo bought his wife a ring.
(b) Saga was born in Monze in 1964.
(c) Melody became a doctor.
(d) Someone gave me this book.
(e) Chikumbe put the cat in his pocket.
(f) Simona cries
(g) Ngamanya ate the cake
(h) The board elected Tembo chairperson
[111]
UNIT ELEVEN: RELATIVE CLAUSES
11.0 Introduction
This unit introduces you to relative clauses. Relative clauses can improve a sentence
by adding auxiliary or essential information about a noun or a noun phrase.
However, it is easy to forget the proper rules of how to use them. So, follow
through keenly as we give some detail on what relative clauses are, types and their
syntactic roles in the structure of the English sentence.
Learning Outcomes
These are subordinate clauses which are linked to the main clause by a back pointing
element, usually a relative pronoun. The relative clause post-modifies a noun phrase
where the relative pronoun points back to the head of noun phrase. Relative clauses
are of two types: Restrictive and Non-Restrictive.
Clauses are subcategorized into Restrictive (or defining Relative) Clauses and Non-
restrictive (or non-defining) Clauses. The next section discusses the two sub-divisions
[112]
of relative clauses. It is hoped that you will pay particular attention to see what makes
the two types different from each other. We begin by dealing with the restrictive type
and its syntactic roles in sentence.
These are clauses which restrict the meaning of the main clause. They are also called
Defining as they define the main clause. They rely heavily on the relative pronoun
which may be subject of the relative clause, direct object, complement of preposition,
possessive or indirect object.
(e) Emelia is the woman for whom the Zambian flag flies.
(f) The information for which you asked me to look is unavailable.
(g) The information that you asked me to look for is unavailable.
(h) The issue Ø the politicians are arguing about affects us all.
(i) The field of medicine which you socialise in should be your passion.
(j) The man who you smiled at is my Syntax lecturer.
Whose is the only possessive relative pronoun in English. The antecedent of "whose"
can be both people and things. In grammar, the meaning of antecedent is more
specific as it refers to a word that comes before a different term that represents the
original word. In the sentence, ―When John went out in the rain, he got wet.‖ John in
the sentence is the antecedent of he which represents it. Whose here is being used to
represent the nouns appearing immediately before it. Consider the examples in (k) -
(n).
(k) Kate, whose sister I used to share a house with, has gone to work in
Australia.
(l) The family whose house burnt in the fire was immediately given a
complimentary suite in a hotel.
(m) This is the man whose car has been abandoned at the lay by.
(n) It is a rambling Tudor house, whose sitting room looks out over a
wonderful walled garden.
We are all familiar with the indirect object by now. Owing to this, we will not delve
into explaining what it is. We just refer you back to chapter in which the syntactic
roles of the noun have been discussed. In this part, we show you how a relative
pronoun can play the role of an indirect object. See the examples in (o) - (q).
[114]
(o) He does not know the woman that he bought the coffee yesterday.
(p) Paul, whom David passed the ball to, plays professional soccer.
(q) The rug, which Grandma gave a good beating, once belonged to a prince.
11.2.2 Non-Restrictive Relative Clauses
These are clauses that do not restrict or define the main clause. They merely provide
additional information about the main clause. Therefore, the clause may be separated
through the use of commas. The information contained in the non-restrictive clause
can be left out without affecting the meaning of the sentence as in (r) - (t).
(r) Our Syntax lecturer, who lives in Chongwe Township, drives a Gaia.
(s) This book, which I bought yesterday, is boring.
(t) Kambeu met Mbao, who invited him for supper.
11.3 Sentence Relative Clauses
These clauses function as sentence adverbials as in:
(u) James adores Thandiwe, which surprises everybody.
(v) Some people say there is no God, which I find strange.
Find time to read more on these on your own. You can use the internet and we are
sure you will find a lot of material there.
11.4 Comment Clauses
These clauses do not add anything to the information in the sentence but comment on
truth, the manner of saying it or attitude of the speaker. They are only loosely related
to the rest of the main clause and function as sentence adverbials. Of course, they give
a natural tone to the speech in which they are used. See examples in (w) – (y).
(w) At that time, I believe, Bingo worked as a driver.
(x) Stated frankly, our students will win.
(y) To be honest, patients have no chance of recovery.
11.5 Comparison Clauses
These clauses present comparisons of two things, people or actions. They are
introduced by subordinating conjunctions like ―as … as, not so/as … as, comparative
+ than.‖ There are three types of comparisons. We compare things to a higher degree,
same degree and to a lower degree. See examples of each of these in (z) – (bb).
(z) Divorce is more common than it used to be.
(aa) Patience earns as much money is as I do.
(bb) This road is not as crowded as other one.
[115]
11.6 Adverbial Clauses
Adverbial clauses or Adverb clauses are groups of words with a subject and a
predicate that function as adverbs in a sentence. Just like adverbs, they answer the
questions ―when?‖, ―where?‖, ―how?‖, ―why?‖ to describe time, place, manner,
purpose, etc.: We ought to note that these fall into several categories such as of time,
place, contrast/concession, cause/reason, purpose, result and condition.
11.6.1 Of Time
These adverbials tell about when something happens. To express this, such
conjunctions as ‗when‘, ‗whenever‘, ‗before‘, ‗after‘, ‗as‘, ‗while‘ ‗until‘, ‗as soon
as‘, and ‗since‘ are used. Consider examples in (cc) - (dd).
(mm) He took off his shoes so that he would not ruin the carpet.
(nn) Walk carefully lest you should fall.
(oo) The doctors did extensive research in order that they can find the cure
for that disease.
(pp) To prepare for their exams, the students intensified their studies.
11.6.6 Of Result
Result clauses are used to indicate result of an action or situation. Result clauses are
introduced by conjunctions such as so, so that …, or such … that. Consider the
examples in (qq) - (ss).
[117]
11.6.7 Of Condition
Adverbial clauses of condition tell us about the circumstances under which
something happens. These clauses often begin with ‗if‘, ‗unless‘, or ‗provided that‘.
The expressions in (xx) - (zz) demonstrate the condition.
Adverbial clauses of manner show us how something happens. They usually begin
with the conjunctions ‗like‘, ‗as though‘ or ‗as if‘: See how these have been shown in
(aaa) - (ccc).
(aaa) She looked as though she was in pain.
(bbb) Ryan walked past as if he hadn‘t seen us.
(ccc) He talked to me like I was a child.
11.6.9 Activity
[118]
11.7 Conclusion
In this unit, you have been introduced to relative clauses. You surely must have seen
how relative clauses can improve a sentence by adding auxiliary or essential
information about a noun or a noun phrase. In the unit, detail on what relative
clauses are, types and their syntactic roles in the structure of the English sentence
has been given.
11.8 Summary
Covered in the unit are the different relative clauses and how they are realised. The
subject and object pronouns have also been discussed bringing out how they too are
syntactically realised. Finally, the unit has discussed types of adverbial clauses and
their functions.
[119]
UNIT 12: TENSE, ASPECT AND MODALITY
12.0 Introduction
This unit introduces you to Tense, Aspect and Modality. Tense and Aspect are the two
main grammatical categories which must be involved in clause or sentential
constructions in English as a tenseness language. Tense and aspect are the two
domains into which the grammar of time is traditionally divided. Modality on the
other hand is concerned with the speaker's assessment of, or attitude towards, the
potentiality of a state of affairs. In English grammar, it is essential to understand the
difference between tense and aspect carefully as they are important verb forms that
show many differences between them. In this unit, we deal with how each of these
grammatical categories is used in sentential construction in English as a tenseness
language. Keep a closer at each of them as it is explained in subsequent sections.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this unit, you should be able to;
define the terms tense and aspect as grammatical categories in the English
language
distinguish tense from aspect
state the role of tense and aspect in sentential construction
demonstrate how tense and account for sentential construction in English
state the various forms that each of the concepts may take; and
describe modality
identify modal verbs used to express modality
demonstrate various types of modality
Show how the concept of future tense is misleading.
12.1 Tense
Tense is the linguistic device that is used to express time relations. It is the
grammatical expression of the location of events in time. Comrie (1995) assumes that
tense is the grammaticalised location in time. Time anchors an event to the speaker‘s
experience of the world by relating the event time to a point of reference. The
universal, unmarked reference point is the moment of speaking – speech time. In
narrative, a point in past time is usually taken as the reference point. Tense, in short
[120]
describes the way in which events, processes and states relate to the time axis. In most
languages that have tense, tense is indicated on the verb, either by the verb
morphology, or by grammatical expression adjacent to the verb as with certain
auxiliaries. The different morphological structures of verbs as a result of tense
changes can be said to be verb-forms. Thus, the verb-forms that show differences in
time are called tenses. It is important to know, as earlier alluded to that tenses are
formed by changing the verb as demonstrated in (a) - (d).
(a) I know him very well.
(b) I knew he was lying.
(c) She works at the mall every Sunday.
(d) Chipego worked all through the night.
In sentences (a) - (d), you can see that the verbs have been changed to convey time and
hence (a) and (c) sentences are in present tense while (b) and (d) sentences are in past
tense. It is equally important to know that tenses are also formed by adding auxiliary
verbs as in the sentences given in (e) - (h):
In grammar, the word tense refers to the time period in which the verb of a sentence
places an action.
Tense roughly means reference to the time at which events take place, or at which
processes or states hold. English, for example, clearly distinguishes between past and
non-past tense.
There are two tenses in English: present and past. Unlike many languages, English
does not have a future tense. To talk about the future, English requires either
the modal verb WILL or the present progressive. Go on google and LEARN how to
[121]
talk about the future in the lesson future constructions in English. For each
grammatical tense, there are subcategories called aspects.
12.2 Aspect
Aspect refers to the duration of an event within a particular tense. In other words, the
aspect of a tense allows us to describe or understand how an event unfolds over time.
English language has four aspects: simple, progressive, perfect, and perfect
progressive. Here are all verbal aspects in English grouped by verb tense.
Comrie (1976) defines aspect as ―different ways of viewing the internal temporal
constituency of a situation‖. Aspect expresses whether the situation is complete,
ongoing, durative, iterative and habitual. Aspect characterizes perfective/imperfective
oppositions. Comrie (1976) defines the perfective/imperfective oppositions as
―perfectivity indicates the view of a situation as a single whole, without distinction of
the various separate phases that make up that situation; while the imperfective pays
essential attention to the internal structure of the situation‖.
12.3 Modality
[122]
countless natural language expressions, including counterfactuals, propositional
attitudes, evidential, habitual and generics.
In grammar and semantics, modality refers to linguistic devices that indicate the
degree to which an observation is possible, probable, likely, certain, permitted, or
prohibited. In English, these notions are commonly (though not exclusively)
expressed by modal auxiliaries, such as can, might, should, may and will. These
modals express ability, desirability, permission, obligation, and probability. They are
sometimes combined with not. Consider how these expressions have been achieved in
(i) – (m).
(i) Martha can ride a bicycle. (Ability – Present tense) (could – Past tense)
(j) I should go /I ought to go (Desirability)
(k) I may go (Permission)
(l) John must go (Obligation)
(m) He might be there; He may be there; He must be there. (Likelihood)
The simplest way to explain modality is to say that it has to do with the stance the
speaker adopts toward some situation expressed in an utterance...Modality reflects the
speaker's attitude toward the situation being described" ("Linguistic Perspectives on
English Grammar," 2010, Endley, J. M). Modality, then, is a resource speakers and
writers use when they are staking claims to knowledge: it allows them to formulate
different kinds of claims (e.g., assertions, opinions, hypotheses, speculations) and
indicate how committed they are to those claims." ("The Teacher's Guide to
Grammar," Oxford University Press, 2007). Find time to read more on modality,
particularly the types of modality and see how they relate to what has been covered in
this part. Search for such types as root and epistemic modality, which are sub-
categorised.
12.4 Mood
Usually, when we hear the word, mood, we connect to how someone is feeling.
However, mood of verbs has nothing to do with someone‘s feelings. No doubt, you
are asking what is meant by mood. Mood is the form of the verb that shows the mode
[123]
or manner in which a thought is expressed. The moods are: indicative, imperative,
interrogative, conditional and subjunctive.
(t) If you want to visit your friends, you should study now.
(u) If I travelled to Orlando, I would visit Disney World.
[124]
(v) If I were in her situation, I would never drive. (Expresses a hypothetical
situation)
(w) My mother demanded he prepare the luggage. (Expresses a demand)
(x) I wish my sister were faster at preparing food in the morning. (Expresses
a wish)
12.5 Activity
12.6 Conclusion
The unit has introduced you to Tense, Aspect and Modality. It has shown that Tense
and Aspect are the two main grammatical categories which must be involved in clause
or sentential constructions in English as a tenseness language.
12.7 Summary
In this unit, we have dealt with how each of these grammatical categories (Tense,
Aspect, Mood and Modality) is used in sentential construction in English as a
tenseness language. Keep a closer at each of them as it is explained in subsequent
sections.
[125]
UNIT 13: THE ENGLISH SENTENCE
13.0 Introduction
This unit introduces you to the English sentence. In the unit, we specifically expose
you to the classification of English sentences. You will notice that sentences in
English are classified in two forms. One classification is based on the sentence‘s
structural appearance or their syntactic classes (Structural Classification). The other
classification has to do with the functions English sentences perform (Functional
Classification).
Learning Outcomes
You should remember from your academic writing course in first year that there are
four basic sentence structures in English. Sentence structures range from simple to
complex, or short to long sentences. Note that during your writing process, you will
need to combine different kinds of sentences to make the flow your writing smooth or
indeed well pertained. Remember, you will not only use short or choppy sentences or
indeed only long ones in your writing because your readers may criticize your work.
And so, a combination both of short and long, or indeed complex sentences will
enable you express simple and complex ideas clearly.
[126]
(a) Judy laughed.
(b) Mutinta and Joyce ate nsima and rice.
(f) Until the lion learns t write, every story will glorify the hunter.
(g) It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light.
13.1.4 Compound Complex Sentence
As the name suggests, compound-complex sentences combine compound sentences
with complex sentences. They require at least two independent clauses and at least
one subordinating clause. To combine them, follow the specific grammar rules for
[127]
each. Read more about them and be sure you are using your coordinating conjunctions
and subordinating conjunctions in the right places. See this in (h) - (i).
(h) Chipego read her book and ate her meal while she listened to music.
(i) Ocean currents contain a great deal of energy, and can produce electricity
once we to harness them.
As regards the functions of sentences, note that there are four main types of sentences that can
be distinguished by their function and purpose. The sentences have been described and
exemplified in the subsequent section.
[128]
13.2.3 Imperative Sentence
This type of sentence expresses an emotional feeling and it is usually ended with an
exclamatory mark. Examples are as shown in (q) - (r).
(q) What a wonderful event this is!
(r) How lovely she looks!
13.3 Activity
13.4 Conclusion
The unit has exposed you to the English sentence, discussing the two forms of
classifying the sentence and why you should apply the different sentence structures in
your academic essay writing. It is hoped that you have carefully grasped the material
so learnt.
13.5 Summary
We hope you have had a good experience with the classification of the sentences and
consequently the reason for applying a variety of sentences in your writing. These, we
[129]
are sure have given you insight on how you can improve on your continuous writing.
Get ready therefore, for the next unit on Transformation Generative Grammar.
[130]
UNIT 14: TRANSFORMATIONAL GENERATIVE GRAMMAR (TGG)
14.0 Introduction
Learning Outcomes:
[131]
One major concept which was not properly handled in Traditional and Structural
grammar is the case ambiguity, thus Chomsky developed the Transformational
Grammar and ambiguities are handled properly in the deep structure as
postulated by Chomsky. The TGG is primarily focused on Syntax than on
Semantics.
Note here that in linguistic competence, one knows the structure of the language
and the rules while in linguistic performance one knows how to use language
appropriately.
The term generate is often used in T.G. which is also often referred to as
Transformational Generative Grammar. When a rule is said to generate a
sentence it means that the rule describes how the particular string or linguistic
element is formed and also how potential sentences can be formed. This makes
transformational grammar a grammar of competence rather than a grammar of
Performance like Traditional Grammar. TG relies on three levels of rules: Phrase
Structure, Transformational Structure and Morphophonemics. Each has its own
set of writing rules.
[133]
kernel consists of simple, declarative active sentences … all other sentences can
be described as transforms (Chomsky, 1957). Transforms are ‘these sentences
derivable by the largely nonrecursive phrase-structure level of the grammar
(Lees, 1957).
From the two definitions of ‘kernel’ sentences and transforms Chomsky makes
the following assumptions concerning the sentence. These assumptions are with
regard to what he refers to as the basic sentence.
This notion of the kernel sentence as the basis of generating other sentences was
however abandoned in the revised TG theory of 1965. It came to be understood
that a linguistic transformation is a process that involves the change of one
linguistic structure to another as for instance, the change of the active to the
passive. This type of change is recognized in traditional grammar too. The
sentences (c) - (d) demonstrate this structural change.
[134]
on a given string with a given constituent structure and converts it to a new string
with a new derived constituent structure.
In addition to the assumptions about the sentence, Chomsky brings out concepts
of the Deep and Surface Structure. Kindly pay particular attention so that you do
not confuse the two concepts. Once you confuse the two, you will have trouble in
the transformations that will follow after these.
The concept of deep and surface structure was also developed in 1965 by
Chomsky. The deep structure of a sentence refers to the basic (underlying)
meaning of a sentence derived from its syntactic and semantic components. Put
simply, the deep structure of a sentence is the way the structure is understood to
mean or our interpretation of it.
(e) John and Mary are here. (Surface structure derived from 2 deep
structures).
(f) John is here (deep structure)
(g) Mary is here (deep structure)
(f) and (g) are the two deep structures from which 1, the structures have been
derived. Note that John and Mary are two separate entities, thus creating the two
deep structures that give rise to the surface structure; John and Mary are here
by applying one transformational rule called Conjunction Reduction
Transformational Rule. This shall be later discussed in detail.
[135]
It is important at this point to understand that the distinction between deep and
surface structure can help to explain why some sentences are ambiguous on the
surface stricture. Chomsky argues that we have ambiguous sentences because
they come two deep structures but appear the same in the surface structure. In
English grammar, syntactic ambiguity (also called structural ambiguity
or grammatical ambiguity) is the presence of two or more possible meanings
within a single sentence or sequence of words, as opposed to lexical ambiguity,
which is the presence of two or more possible meanings within a single word. To
clearly understand this concept, consider the following examples in (h) - (i2).
Meaning, of (h1) is that they gave her food intended for dogs. Focus is on ‘they
fed her' the object being ‘her'. The word dog functions as an adjective,
describing what kind of food.
or
(h2) They fed / her dog / food
or
(i2) Flying / planes / can be dangerous
The planes that are flying are the ones that are dangerous.
[136]
14.6 The architecture of the Transformational Generative Grammar
The grammatical model refers to the organisation of grammar of a language.
According to Chomsky's TGG, the grammar of a language is divided into two
major components known as the base component and the transformational
component.
Of course, be reminded that, as earlier pointed out, other literature shows three
levels upon which Transformational Grammar (TG) relies. These are: Phrase
Structure, Transformational Structure and Morphophonemics.
There are two types of phrase structure rules at this level of Transformational
grammar, namely: categorical and lexical. Categorical Rules expand
grammatical categories into other grammatical categories. Lexical Rules expand
grammatical categories into lexical categories or items – words. At this point, we
provide you with details on the phrase structure rules and will get back to
categorical, lexicon and finally, the transformational structure. You will be
required to pay particular attention here for you to fully understand the
subsequent section. So, follow closely so that you do not miss out on anything.
This part forms the foundation to sentence transformations and as such demands
your undisrupted attention. Provided in this part are details on the PS Rules.
And so, in Phrase Structure Grammar, the instruction formulas are known as
Rewrite Rules (Transformational Rules). These rules are given by Chomsky in
Syntactic Structures (1957) as:
1. Sentence - NP + VP.
This means rewrite a sentence as NP (Noun Phrase) + VP (Verb Phrase) or
simply the constituents of a sentence are a Noun Phrase and a Verb Phrase.
2. NP = D + N
This means rewrite NP as D and N where D means a determiner such as a,
an or the and N means a noun. Note that Chomsky in his Syntactic Structures
uses T to mean determiner, but in module and course, we use D instead of T
to mean determiner.
3. VP = Verb + NP
S NP + VP
D N + VP
D + N + Verb + NP
The + N + Verb + NP
The student + Verb + NP
The student + borrowed + D + N
The student + borrowed + the + N
The + student + borrowed + the + book
The constituent structure of the sentence can also be shown in what is known as
a tree diagram or a phrase marker thus:
S
NP VP
D N V NP
D N
2. NP (a) (Det) + N
(c) S
4. VP MV + COMP
5. MV V
[139]
6. COMP (a) Prepositional Phrase (PP)
7. PP P + NP
8. ADV. P ADV
For practice at these phrase structure rules, the following Abbreviations for
syntactic categories have been provided for you. Kindly read and ensure you
master them. Throughout your practice of sentential diagramming, you will be
using these abbreviations.
S Sentence
NP Noun Phrase
N Noun
D Determiner
VP Verb Phrase
V Verb
AP Adjective Phrase
A Adjective
AdvP Adverbial Phrase
PP Prepositional Phrase
P Preposition
COMP Complement
John / is here
NP VP
N MV ADV
[140]
3. No. Singular (sg.), Plural (pl.)
7. Prog. be-ing.
At the level of the lexicon (lexical rules), we are inserting the actual words or
morphemes. The lexicon comprises various morphemes or words that make up
various types of phrases. In other words, it is at the level/stage of the lexicon that
we attach the morphemes. Insertion of actual words has been demonstrated in the
sentence: The man is here:
NP VP
Categorical level
DET N MV ADV
[141]
The sentence is the starting point of the primary constituent of any language. A
sentence is made of different components-;
Q + NP + AUX + VP e.g. W
(CONN +) S
(NEG) + NP + AUX + VP
NP (DET) + N
The Auxiliary
The verb phrase (main verb) may have the complement and this complement
may be an adjective phrase, or prepositional phrase, noun phrase or adverbial
phrase as already shown under the categorical rules.
[142]
VP V + (COMP)
Grammars have nothing to say about units higher than the sentence, such as the
paragraph, the discourse exchange, the text, etc. Such higher units will be the
object of another type of enquiry. In this section of the module we consider the
relation between the structure of the sentence and the words that make up the
sentence. We shall see that sentence structure is to a large extent determined by
lexical information.
As pointed out earlier, it is assumed that you are familiar with the basic
techniques and terminology of sentence parsing learnt in traditional grammar. In
this section, we briefly look at the basic notions of syntactic structure that will be
the starting point for our discussion and consequently an introduction to
sentential transformations. Consider the following example:
(2a) S
NP AUX VP
N MV NP PP
DET N P NP
DET N
Note that it is also possible to add detail to this sentence by bringing out the
complement that lies after the main verb. It is in the complement that we find the
two (2) phrases; the NP – his employer and the PP – at the officer. Consider the
subsequent tree diagram (2aa). The diagram shows the verb complement whose
constituent parts are as stated the NP and the PP. In fact, what we see is that the
two (NP and PP) are Immediate Constituents (sisters) stemming from the
COMP, their mother.
Of course, some other aspects have still been left out in the tree diagram. Such
aspects as number (singular & plural) do not show, but they have been reflected
in the other diagrams that deal with different transformations.
[144]
(2aa) S
NP AUX VP
N T MV COMP
NP PP
14.7 Transformations
You ought to note here that Chomsky‘s grammar of the transformational type
implies that it makes precise the rules for generating new sentences not for
analysing existing ones; the rules themselves provide the analysis. Chomsky also
means that the rules are those for transforming one type of sentence into another;
affirmative into negative, simple into compound or complex, and so forth. The
transformations make the relationships among such sentences clear.
[145]
14.7.1 Types of Transformational Rules
[Link] The Passive Transformational Rule (Passivisation Rule)
The passive transformational rule confirms one of the assumptions about the
sentence. The assumption which claims that “all sentences are active and the
passive ones as transforms of the active” This rule does the following:
Sub NP Obj NP
The subject noun phrase, Kambeu has been moved to the object NP position and
the window, the object noun phrase, has been moved to subject noun position.
In this case by has been inserted to the immediate left of Kambeu, the
juxtaposed subject noun phrase.
It inserts been (passive -be) to the immediate left of the lexical main
verb or after the last unit of the auxiliary.
To understand the example that follows, go back to the explanation on what the
Passive Transformational Rule does. Read the rule carefully as you read the
sentence and follow what happens at each step.
[146]
The students stole the books from the library
NP AUX VP
V NP PP
DET N No P NP
DET N No.
The student pl. pas steal the book pl from the library sg.
The Tree diagram of the Active voice “The students stole the books from the
library” shows the deep structure that has been referred to earlier in this unit. It
will be from this deep structure that the surface structure will be derived from.
From this sentence we derive the passive sentence (passive voice) as is shown
the following sentence and diagram.
[147]
S
NP AUX VP
DET N No MV COMP
V PP PP
P NP P NP
(-en)
Pas.
The book Pl. be steal by the student Pl. from the library Sg.
NP AUX VP
DET N No MV NP
V DET N No.
[148]
The sentence The meat was eaten by the dog is the passive of the sentence The
dog ate the meat in the preceding Tree diagram. The subsequent diagram
demonstrates this.
NP AUX VP
DET N No MV COMP
V PP
P NP
DET N No.
(-en)
And the subsequent diagram shows deletion of the agent. Thus, fulfilling The
Agent deletion transformational Rule; The line you see cutting between the VP
and COMP deletes the Agent introduced in the sentence by the preposition by; the
Agent being deleted in this case is the dog – by the dog.
NP AUX VP
DET N No MV COMP
V PP
P NP
DET N No.
(-en)
[149]
Agent “the dog” deleted
The sentence therefore reads:
The meat be eat - The meat was eaten
NP AUX VP NP AUX VP
NP AUX VP
NP CONN NP
[150]
[Link] The Yes/No Question Transformational Rule
The Yes/No Question Transformational Rule Adds an Auxiliary to the sentence and
Moves it to the front.
The word ―do‖ in ―Do I go,‖ incidentally, comes from the category of words we call
Auxiliaries. In this case it is name is the Dummy Auxiliary because it does not add any
meaning to the sentence. So why use it at all, you may ask.
Because in the rule we call the Yes/No Question Transformation (in other words to
ask a question that requires a yes or no response) we must move the auxiliary to the
front of the sentence.
Since the statement, ―I go,‖ contains no visible auxiliary, it is necessary to insert one
first, as in ―I do go.‖ (Transformation No. 1a).
We then move it to the front of the sentence, as in ―Do I go?‖ (Transformation No.
1b).
Now suppose I want to change that same statement to a negative sentence. We add
two auxiliaries -- the dummy ―do‖ and the negative ―not‖ (Transformation No. 3,) as
in ―I do not go.‖
1. This rule inserts do to the right of Tense if the AUX of the declarative
sentence has Tense and other elements.
2. Then the rule shifts Tense and the first part of the AUX to the immediate
left of the subject noun phrase. e.g.
For the sake of the demonstration with the tree diagram, we can try the sentence:
She (do) did put the books on the shelf (with the dummy do)
[151]
This situation has been demonstrated in subsequent tree diagrams.
(No. 1a)
do NP AUX VP
N No MV COMP
do NP PP
DET N No P NP
She sg. Pas. put the book Pl. on the shelf Sg.
The question thus reads; Did she put it the books on the shelf?
(No. 1b) S1
AUX S
NP VP
T N MV COMP
V NP PP
past DET N P NP
DET N
[152]
[Link] Negative Transformational Rule
The negative transformational rule inserts not to the immediate right of Tense and the
first part of the aux or to the immediate left of the lexical verb. e.g.
NP AUX VP
Pro.
ADV S’
SUBJ PRED
NP AUX VP
DET N T Prog V
NP AUX VP
[153]
Conclusion
Transformational grammar and Transformational generative grammar make up
what could be considered the third phase in the development of grammatical
models. Their most important contributions of this phase are the processes and
rules evolved to address structural transformations in language.
14.8 Activity
Summary
This unit has made the following points: Transformational grammar (TG) is a
type of grammar that tries to explain the rules which govern structural changes
and the formation of utterances. It tries to explain how a native speaker forms
and understands sentences in his native language. The ability of a native speaker
is referred to as Competence. What the native speaker does when he/she uses
language on specific occasions is referred to as Performance. TG relies on three
levels of rules: Phrase Structure, Transformational Structure and
Morphophonemics. Each has its own set of writing rules. A phrase structure
grammar analyses utterances in terms of its syntactic constituents which are
SVOAC. The second level in transformational grammar is that of
transformational structure.
[154]
REFERENCES AND BIBIOGRAPHY
Adejare, R.A. & Adejare, O. (2006). Tertiary English Grammar. Lagos: Difamo
Books.
Alasmari, J., Atwell, E., & Watson, J. (2017). A comparative analysis of verb tense
and aspect in Arabic and English using Google translate. International Journal on
Islamic Applications in Computer Science and Technology, 5(3), 9-13
Brown, K., Clark, E. V., McMahon, A., Miller, J. and Milroy, L. (2005). The
Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
[155]
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge:
Cambridge University.
Marchand, Hans (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-
formation. München: [Link]'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung
Nida, E.A. (1974). Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of words. Michigan: The
University of Michigan Press
[156]
Odebunmi, A (2006) Meaning in English: An Introduction. Ogbomosho: Critical
Sphere
Roberts, N. B. & Spencer, A. (2001). English Syntax and Argumentation (2nd ed.).
New York: Macmillan Publishers.
Spencer, A. & Zwicky, A.M. (1998). The Handbook of Morphology. UK: Blackwell
Publishers.
Tomori, S. H., Milne, J., Banjo, A. & Afolyan, A. (1977). The morphology and
syntax of present-day English : an introduction. London: Heinemann Educational
Trask R.L. & Stockwell, P. (2007). Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts.
London: Routledge Publishers.
[157]
Inflectional morphemes alter the form of a word to express different grammatical categories without changing its core meaning or word class. For instance, the addition of '-s' in 'books' indicates plural, or '-ed' in 'walked' marks the past tense . In contrast, derivational morphemes change the word's meaning and sometimes its part of speech. Examples include 'happy' to 'happiness', where the adjective 'happy' becomes the noun 'happiness', or 'educate' to 'education' . These transformations illustrate their distinct roles in language.
Morphemes are fundamental in delineating semantic content and grammatical function in English. Lexical morphemes contribute to the word’s semantic core, providing dictionary meaning (e.g., 'teach', 'courage'), whereas grammatical morphemes adjust the syntactic and morphological framework of sentences without altering core meanings (e.g., 'the', 'but'). Bound grammatical morphemes, like inflectional suffixes ('-s', '-ed'), mark tense, plurality, and other syntactic roles, while derivational morphemes can change the word's meaning and its part of speech (e.g., 'drive' to 'driver'). This dual role supports precision and complexity in English communication.
Prepositional phrases serve a dual syntactic function, modifying either nouns or verbs by adding detail and context. As adjectival phrases, they describe nouns and help specify or limit the noun's referent, as in 'The girl with red hair' where 'with red hair' adds description to 'girl' . As adverbial phrases, they modify verbs, elucidating circumstances such as time, place, or manner, shown in 'She arrived by bus', where 'by bus' provides information about the mode of arrival . This dual role adds depth and detail to sentence meaning and structure.
Kernel sentences, in Chomsky's Transformational Generative Grammar, are basic, simple sentence structures from which complex sentences derive through transformations. These serve as the foundational declarative, affirmative, active forms before being transformed into passive, negative, or interrogative sentences . Transformations adjust the structure while preserving semantic intent, for example, converting 'Mwaka broke the window' into 'The window was broken by Mwaka'. Understanding kernel forms is key to analyzing grammatical relationships and transformations between sentences, highlighting TGG's focus on underlying sentence structures .
Free morphemes can stand independently as complete words, carrying inherent meaning. They include nouns, verbs, adjectives, and some grammatical words (e.g., 'school', 'teach', 'and'). In contrast, bound morphemes cannot function as standalone words and must attach to free morphemes. These include affixes like '-s', '-ed', '-ing', and prefixes such as 'un-', 'mis-' . While free morphemes form the core meaning of words, bound morphemes adjust grammatical properties or create new words.
A free morpheme as a root operates as the base unit to which other elements attach. It can exist independently with complete semantic and grammatical integrity, often as nouns, verbs, or adjectives (e.g., 'boy', 'school'). A full morpheme, one that carries inherent meaning, is not limited to being a root but can also represent words with stand-alone meaning capacities . Both types contribute semantic content, but the root establishes substance while the full morpheme may also include functional terms (e.g., 'and', 'the'), bridging grammatical roles.
In English morphology, words are formed by combining different types of morphemes. Lexical morphemes carry the core meaning (e.g., 'boy', 'girl'), while grammatical morphemes, including prepositions and conjunctions, provide structural support (e.g., 'of', 'and'). Morphemes can be free, standing alone as words, or bound, attaching to other morphemes . Bound morphemes are classified into inflectional morphemes, which modify a word's grammatical category (e.g., 'walk' + '-s' = 'walks'), and derivational morphemes, which change the word class or meaning (e.g., 'happy' + '-ness' = 'happiness'). This combination of morphemes allows for extensive word formation and modification in the language.
In Transformational Generative Grammar, transformational rules play a critical role in converting underlying structures into varied sentences. They include processes like moving elements and altering sentence forms without changing essential meanings, as seen in the transformation from active to passive voice (e.g., 'She broke the window' to 'The window was broken by her'). These rules involve changes to constituent structures while maintaining the propositional content. Transformational rules focus on deep structures (the underlying meaning) and surface structures (the expressive form), enabling a range of sentence forms to manifest from the same semantic intent .
A bound morpheme is one that cannot stand alone and must attach to a free morpheme to convey meaning . Bound morphemes, such as prefixes and suffixes, serve as grammatical indicators, influencing a word's structure and meaning. For example, 'un-' in 'unhappy' negates the meaning of 'happy', while adding '-ly' to 'quick' forms the adverb 'quickly' to modify verbs in sentences . This ability to alter meaning or grammatical function highlights their importance in sentence construction.
Chomsky's deep and surface structures offer a framework to understand how sentences with similar meanings can have different forms. The deep structure represents the core semantic relationship of a sentence, while the surface structure reflects its final syntactic form. Transformational rules convert the deep structure into surface structures, allowing expression variations like active or passive voices ('The boy kicked the ball' vs. 'The ball was kicked by the boy'). This separation underlies the flexibility and diversity of expression within a language, showcasing the generative capacity of syntax to convey meaning.