0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views5 pages

20240823-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Brisbane Coroners Court - Re Wieambilla Inquest - Trains

In my view it is essential that the Coroner is open minded and consider all relevant issues, including the circumstances surrounds the killings and any unlawful conduct by the Queensland Police themselves.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views5 pages

20240823-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Brisbane Coroners Court - Re Wieambilla Inquest - Trains

In my view it is essential that the Coroner is open minded and consider all relevant issues, including the circumstances surrounds the killings and any unlawful conduct by the Queensland Police themselves.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Page 1

1
2
3 Brisbane Coroners Court 23-8-2024
4 [email protected]
5 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
6 SUBMISSION:
7
8 20240824-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Brisbane Coroners Court -
9 Re Wieambilla inquest - Trains
10 Coroner,
11 I have never been to Queensland and never knew the Trains, however, I may just so to
12 say open up your eyes to details/issues that may otherwise be overlooked/not considered.
13
14 I used to conduct a Special Lifeline Service under the title MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS
15 PREVAIL® from 1982 until 2019, when my wife became very ill and I no longer could attend
16 to matters of others as such. In the process I would assist and even represent people in litigation,
17 albeit always without charge, not even for my out-of-pocket expenses. I gained a considerable
18 knowledge but politicians and their officials (collaborators) usually couldn’t give a darn.
19 To give you an example.
20 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2017_Melbourne_car_attack
21 January 2017 Melbourne car attack - Wikipedia
22 Six people were killed and twenty-seven were seriously injured. ... The driver of the vehicle, James
23 "Dimitrious" Gargasoulas, who was in a drug-induced psychosis ...
24
25 Reality is that already 6 months earlier I had actually warned the then Prime minister Malcolm
26 Turnbull as well ads than Premier of Victoria Daniel Andrews that Bourke Street Mall could be
27 targeted for mass murder and urged to install bollards. And again, in December 2006 a month
28 before the killings. But both did nothing to prevent it and then when the people were killed both
29 falling over each other were there for photo opportunities concealing they could have prevented
30 it. And you unlikely will find the coroner having exposed this!
31
32 With the Trains, which I never knew, I view that to do justice to an inquest you need to inquire
33 and consider the relevant circumstances at the time. There can be no question about it that people
34 around Australia were terrorized by their governments aided and abetted by police and armed
35 forces as to the unconstitutional MANDATES.
36 OK, now you may hold I lost you because they were legal after all the High Court of Australia in
37 Palmer v WA stated so, well no the High Court of Australia is limited to adjudicate within the
38 true meaning and application of the principles embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia
39 Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and this is what I view it yet again failed to do, as it did in
40 Municipal of Sydney v Commonwealth 1904, Sue v Hill, MABO, etc.
41
42 In Palmer v WA the High Court of Australia concealed the real relevant part of the Framers of
43 the Constitution, being:
44
45 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
46 Convention)
23-8-2024 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2

1 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-


2 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
3 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
4 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
5 END QUOTE
6
7 Meaning, that the moment the Commonwealth legislated the 1908 Quarantine Act that was the
8 end of all and any state legislation regarding “man-kind” infectious diseases. This act later was
9 replaced with the Biosecurity Act 2015! Meaning, that the States lost their “concurrent”
10 legislative powers since 1908! It also means that the States cannot force any parent to have a
11 child subjected to a childhood vaccination regarding measles, polio and other infectious diseases.
12 Here you had the Trains likely watching how the Queensland Police and other police forces
13 around Australia aided unconstitutionally by the armed forces were terrorising Australians and
14 others to be jabbed and subjected to unconstitutional MANDATES. And then when they have 4
15 armed intruders jumping/climbing their fences do you expect them to roll out the red carpet
16 when those armed intruders/trespassers carried weapons? Hardly to be perceived with a friendly
17 get.
18 Let’s consider reality. If the police at waited at the fence, not entered the property unlawfully,
19 then likely there may have been “ZERO” deaths!
20
21 When you get experts presenting their submissions then unlikely will they present a
22 comprehensive report. As a matter of fact, I doubt that any expert witness will even present a
23 comprehensive set out of the circumstances then prevailing.
24
25 Here you had all this about the non-existing “COVID-19 virus” and how it would decimate the
26 population, with the media all for it, and the Queensland Chief Medical Officer (I understand
27 promoted to be governor) for seeking the Big Tech companies to mute publications by people
28 opposing the “covid scam” with images of violent attacks by police officers upon citizens and all
29 this just to serve the global elites.
30 Yes, I had the Victorian Police making known they would issue a summons against me for
31 exceeding the 5-kilometre permitted radius and not wearing a mask on 28 August 2020 but in the
32 end they never did, because they may just have discovered that I knew my constitutional rights
33 better than they did. After all, we seem to have more than 100,000 lawyers in Australia but not a
34 single one ever achieved what I did when it came to “compulsory” voting. Most if not all of them
35 go voting because well the law requires that, whereas I have the position that if a purported law
36 is in violation to the true meaning and application of the legal principles embedded in the
37 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) then it is not a law at all. Again, it is a
38 pretended law that one can ignore.
39 Well, the Australian Electoral Commission was going to teach me a lessen and charged me in
40 regard of the 2001 federal election with FAILING TO VOTE in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka. I
41 responded with a NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER not just challenging the
42 constitutional validity of the legislation but many other issues, such as “citizenship”. Well, the
43 AEC charged me again regarding the 2004 federal election. To keep it short in the end I appealed
44 both convictions and succeeded unchallenged. Meaning, that any legislation that required
45 “compulsory” voting is unconstitutional!
46 Well, how many lawyer/judges are understanding this when a Defendant is charged with
47 FAILING TO VOTE that the person is innocent?
48
49 How many lawyers understand that neither the purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 and
50 Queensland Constitution Act 2001 are no constitutional at all? As a matter of fact the abolition
51 of the Queensland Upper House in my view was unconstitutional. Meaning that any [purported
52 legislation that since then had not been passed by the Upper House had no constitutional
23-8-2024 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 3

1 validity! By this, not only were the MANDATES unconstitutional as they fell within the
2 exclusive legislative powers of the commonwealth but also any purported legislation by the
3 Queensland Parliament may never have the warrant of law!
4 There are Australians who claim to be “sovereigns” and time and time again court and others
5 ridicule them but reality is they are constitutionally “sovereigns” because they and they alone
6 can approve an amendment to any constitution to which they are a elector to vote.
7 It doesn’t mean that such a “sovereign” can blatantly ignore valid legislative provisions, as they
8 are bound like anyone else to comply with valid legislative provisions, but it appears to me
9 Queensland may have none since the abolition of its Upper House. The purported Queensland
10 Constitution Act 2001 I view is a sheer and utter nonsense. Actually, since 11 November 1910
11 all State land taxes are unconstitutional! Meaning that when a “sovereign” opposes to pay the
12 alleged State land tax named “council rates” then the courts are eager to issue orders against
13 them, because lawyers/judges are generally grossly incompetent in constitutional law. When we
14 then consider the ongoing police/army violent brutality against citizens, then to claim that the
15 Trains were say domestic terrorist or whatever would be to blame the victims for being what the
16 aggressors were doing.
17
18 Let us look as the word “sovereign” and that the colonial Parliaments were “sovereign” and after
19 federation the state Parliaments also were “sovereign” does this means they retained their
20 colonial powers? Absolutely not. This as the States were created from the former colonies and
21 this as Section 106 of the constitution makes very clear “subject to this constitution”. This means
22 that the colonial constitution were transformed in part as state constitutions but as Section 106
23 demands “subject to this constitution” then all the subject matters listed in Section 52 were out
24 of bounds for the nearly created States and all those listed in S51 for so far possible were
25 provided as “concurrent” legislative powers only until the Commonwealth commenced to
26 legislate on a particular subject matter and once it did that was the end of the “concurrent”
27 legislative powers of the states. The State Parliaments therefore were “sovereign” as a
28 “constitutional Parliament”! Whereas prior to federation the colonies “sovereign” powers
29 included to amend their own constitution by an Act of the Parliament, however, after federation
30 the State Parliament became “constitutional Parliaments” and no longer could amend their own
31 constitutions but required a State referendum to approve any State constitution Amendment.
32 Hence, the abolition of the Upper House and the purported 2001 Queensland Constitution Act
33 both are falling foul on this. Moreover, if a State upon federation did not Gazette the emended
34 newly created State constitution then the State had no constitution at all.
35 In Victoria there was alleged Albert Park Racing Act and people violating it were charged, only
36 for the Supreme Court of Victoria to so to say throw the charges out of the window because the
37 purported act had not been Gazetted! As the Court made clear that Royal Assent is not
38 completed until the Act was published in the Gazette. Any purported legislation that was
39 “registered” but not published in the Gazette is not an Act at all! It is without the warrant of law.
40 The Trains may or may not have been aware of this all but that may be irrelevant, as what is
41 relevant is if the Queensland Police lawfully entered their property not as armed intruders but as
42 visible peaceful attendances! If there was no constitutional valid legislation to permit them to be
43 armed intruders upon private property then the blame of any deaths must fall with the
44 Queensland Police.
45 Obviously, it be extremely difficult to know what the Trains were considering and the fact that
46 in some email something was written in itself must not be interpreted as being indicative of
47 violence. After all, I in my writings ongoing have been making clear there will be consequences
48 for trespassing, etc.
49
50 Olga, my 91-year-old wife passed away on 8 August 2024 after long illness. But what is relevant
51 is that Banyule City Council was well aware that my wife suffered from heart failure, leaking
23-8-2024 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 4

1 valves, kidney problems, and other comorbidities. And from onset I make it very clear there
2 were no court orders or warrant(s) against my wife and/or myself! I was caring for my wife
3 under extreme circumstances. Due to the “covid scam” the hospital refused face-to-face
4 treatment, etc.
5 As you may realize from the above writing I am a person who doesn’t hold back to expose the
6 stupidity of government, judges, etc and expose the legal wrongdoing of their collaborators.
7 Well, the Commonwealth in its way has been pestering Olga for years, and well Banyule City
8 council got involved over the years to spy on us. Not that we were doing anything legally wrong
9 but that to them was irrelevant. To them it is show me the person and I will pretend there is a
10 crime. After years of spying upon us they decided time came to well let us know they wanted to
11 inflict harm upon us. Again, Olga my 91-year-old dying wife did no wrong but that was
12 irrelevant to them. So, on 6 September 2023 they trespassed upon our property, despite signage
13 ENTRY PROHIBITED with showing various High Court of Australia rulings, and in the process
14 caused damages that our water bill escalated by hundreds of dollars before I discovered the
15 damages. Not satisfied with this they returned on 7 September 2024 and trespassed upon the
16 neighbours property and then climbed over the fence and then in the process caused property
17 damage to a motorised mobility scooter, etc, and then entered the Gazebo and went along the
18 house to the back and then making photos everywhere. I know it and can prove it because they
19 forwarded a correspondence with photos with the dates included. And after leaving the property
20 again climbing over the fence and then trespassing upon my neighbours property they not
21 satisfied with their criminal actions so far they then went to Olga’s lawfully parked motor
22 vehicle and well vandalised it.
23 Well, not satisfied with their criminal conduct and the harm inflicted, seemingly upsetting my
24 wife was not sufficient, they then returned on 29 November 2003 and again trespassed upon my
25 neighbours property, climbed over the fence, entering the gazebo and then walking to the back of
26 the house. My wife was in the back of the house and then saw a stranger banging on the back
27 door that she got a freight and called out to me someone was trying to break in. I urged my wife
28 to do a blood pressure trespassing and went out and located 2 council officers in the backyard. I
29 made clear they were trespassing and I asked how they entered upon which I was given the
30 understanding they had climbed the fence. When returning into the house my wife’s reading had
31 escalated from 72 to 122 which could have been fatal considering her heart only pumps at 30%
32 and has 2 leaking valves (according to the cardiologist).
33 But the council was not satisfied then again came on 3 January 2024, only this time I had
34 arranged for video recording and well I have the video recordings.
35 Due to the 19 November trespassing, etc, my wife lost the ability to balance herself and had to
36 rely upon a wheelchair.
37 I provided a well set out written report to the Victorian Police but they never even
38 responded in regard of this. But, when my wife died on 8 August 2024 somehow then the
39 police had the time to check out of she was actually death!
40
41 As such, I can very much understand that the Trains may have acted as they did as this terrorism
42 by councils/police and governments must be stopped to avoid further bloodshed.
43
44 My 41-year-old son, a few months ago, was give 2 weeks to 2 years to live. He is in and out of
45 hospitals ongoing, in severe pain. In October 2021 he was forced to have a covid jab or lose his
46 job. In November 2021 he was forced to have another jab or lose his job. After he had both he
47 lost his job anyhow because Holden was downsizing. And well, my son knowing he is dying has
48 given me full authority to pursue the wrongdoers. And unlike lawyers who do this for making
49 monies, I was already on the job, without any payments since January 2020 because I needed to
50 protect Olga. One specialist in December 2021 urged Olga to have the jab but when I asked him
51 to explain the dangers to her, he didn’t know. I then explained what I understood the dangers
23-8-2024 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 5

1 were, and his comment: “You are very intelligent”. Well, I didn’t come for to be told I was
2 “intelligent”, and Olga changed specialist.
3
4 Let me make it very clear, that this “covid scam” was planned way back in 2010 or before with
5 LockStep albeit this was contemplating it would take people 13 years to discover it was a
6 elaborate swindle. Well, I on 8 April 2020 lodged with the Victorian Ombudsman a complaint
7 that the MANDATES were unconstitutional. On 13 April 2020 I also lodged a complaint with
8 the Victorian Human Rights Commissioner as well as with numerous politicians, PM and
9 Premiers, IBAC responded on 19 April 2020 it held it was not a matter of “public interest”.
10 Let me get this right, if all those politicians, etc, had at least investigated what I wrote than all
11 those people who subsequently became victim and died may never have been so. They are the
12 real terrorist, the Premiers and their collaborators who are awarded with all kinds of awards
13 where if convicted they should have the their award earned being the death penalty.
14
15 My blog at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati sets out issues in great details.
16
17 I could add a lot more but it ought to be clear that the Trains may have acted within their rights
18 being faced with 4 armed intruders, as a person wearing a police uniform in itself cannot mean a
19 persons rights are somehow no longer relevant. Police may learn from the following document:
20
21 It is very important that citizens do not cave into the terrorism of any council. Hold
22 them legally accountable. Perhaps this document may provide an insight how to do so.
23 You can download the document from:
24 https://www.scribd.com/document/682156215/20231104-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-
25 to-Lawyers-Molly-Metcalf-Becklegal-Supplement-2
26
27 The article that the Trains murdered police officers appears to blame the victims of armed
28 intruders for what was done unlawfully to them.
29
30 https://www.facebook.com/abcnews.au/videos/an-inquest-will-probe-the-murders-of-two-police-
31 officers-and-a-bystander-at-wiea/948145596994062/
32 An inquest will probe the murders of two police officers ... - Facebook
33 27 July 2024 ... An inquest will probe the murders of two police officers and a bystander at Wieambilla
34 in Queensland in 2022, while an ABC investigation has ...
35
36 Keep in mind if this inquest will turn out to be some white-wash then others may view this that
37 the police are above the rule of law and then the end result could be unimaginable problems to
38 eventuate. During the 37 years of conducting a special lifeline service it was clear to me that
39 police and government officials generally placed themselves above the rule of law and it is this
40 what needs to be stopped.
41 Regarding the harm that was inflicted upon my dying wife the council has not even bothered to
42 apologize for their crime spree and well, I am determine to hold them legally accountable for it
43 all! Police brutality was at an all time high when the Victorian Police were shooting rubber
44 bullets on parents holding small children doing no more but exercising their constitutional rights,
45 all this to pursue A New World Order in violation to our constitutional system!
46
47 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
48
49 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

50 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®


51 (Our name is our motto!)
23-8-2024 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati

You might also like