Page 1

1
2
3 Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus 17-9-2024
4 Email [email protected],
5
6 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
7 Re Discrimination based on age, etc
8 Sir,
9 I refer to my past writings and now add this document on to it.
10
11 Herald Sun 16-9-2024:

12
13 In my view it is the Federal government that is the bully!
14 There appears to be a battle between Anthony Albanese and some Tech companies as to restrict
15 Australians based on age, etc.
16
17 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
18 Convention)
19 QUOTE
20 Mr. ISAACS.-We want a people's Constitution, not a lawyers' Constitution.
21 END QUOTE
22
23 HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
24 Australasian Convention)
25 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
26 The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its
27 Constitution,
28 END QUOTE
29
30 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
31 QUOTE
32 Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by
33 the Parliament of the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in
34 effect, because the provisions of this Constitution, the principles which it embodies,

17-9-2024 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 and the details of enactment by which those principles are enforced, will all have been
2 the work of Australians.
3 END QUOTE
4
5 The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
6 RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
7 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
8 Australasian Convention)
9 QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
10 the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual
11 citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection
12 and secure to him.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
16 QUOTE
17 Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
18
19 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law,
20 every member of a state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state
21 Parliament will be a sentry.
22 As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a
23 sentry, and the whole constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
24 END QUOTE
25
26 Hansard 25-3-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
27 Australasian Convention)
28 QUOTE Mr. WISE:
29 They forget that this commonwealth can only deal with those matters that are expressly
30 remitted to its jurisdiction; and excluded from its jurisdiction are all matters that affect civil
31 rights, all matters that affect property, all matters, in a word, affecting the two great objects
32 which stir the passions and affect the interests of mankind.
33 END QUOTE
34
35 And consider also:
36
37 HANSARD 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
38 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS (Victoria).-
39 It is not something separate from the other portion, and of this Dr. Burgess says, at page
40 217 of the first volume of his work:-
41 The phrase "equal protection of the laws" has been defined by the court to mean
42 exemption from legal discrimination on account of race or colour. This provision would
43 probably, therefore, not be held to cover discriminations in legal standing made for other
44 reasons; as, for example, on account of age or sex, or mental, or even property
45 qualifications. The court distinctly affirms that the history of the provision shows it to have
46 been made to meet only the unnatural discriminations springing from race and colour. If a
47 discrimination should arise from any previous condition of servitude, I think the court
48 would regard this as falling under the inhibition. The language of the provision implies this
49 certainly, if it does not exactly express it.
50 END QUOTE
51
52 Meaning, that the Commonwealth should stop it messing about with constitutional rights. The
53 constitution was not created to deny any Australian his/her “civil rights” merely because the
54 Commonwealth may desire to interfere with it. If anything, we saw with the elaborate “covid

17-9-2024 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 scam” how the Commonwealth and its collaborators were on a path of mass murder, crimes
2 against humanity, etc. That needs to stop!
3 While the Commonwealth in regard of elections does have the constitutional powers to
4 determine when a person is deemed to be of adult age, however that is restricted to electoral
5 issues and not otherwise.
6
7 As a great grandfather I have over my lifespan come across many a person who may be deemed
8 to be underaged but whoever was showing considerably more intelligence then many much of an
9 older age.
10
11 Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
12 Australasian Convention)
13 QUOTE
14 Mr. OCONNOR.-That shows the history of it, as Mr. Isaacs suggests. I am pointing out
15 that there is no necessity for it in our Constitution-no necessity to point out that every
16 person in the states is a citizen of the Commonwealth. There is no necessity for it, because
17 citizenship follows from the rights you give every person in every portion of the
18 Commonwealth under the Constitution. Now, is there any right which it is necessary to
19 state that you give? I see that this provision that we are discussing now makes some
20 reference to privileges or immunities of citizens. Quite sufficient has been pointed out to
21 show that that might work in an exceedingly complicated way-in a way we have no
22 conception of at the present time-if it is inserted in its present form. The only possible
23 differences or disabilities in the states now, as affecting different classes of citizens, are
24 those which exist in regard to aliens and coloured races. But already in clause 52 we have
25 agreed to the insertion of a sub-section which enables the Commonwealth to deal with
26 that matter, and there can be no question about it that in course of time the different
27 laws that exist in the states dealing with such coloured races will be similar, and that
28 such races will be dealt with uniformly, so that whatever privileges [start page 673] or
29 disabilities exist in one state with regard to these people will exist in another state.
30 There is only one portion of the Tasmanian amendment which I think should be preserved,
31 and I prefer it in the form in which it stands as submitted by the Legislative Assembly of
32 Tasmania. I think that the only portion of it which it is necessary to preserve is this-altering
33 the wording slightly so as to make it read as I think it should read-
34 A state shall not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process
35 of law, or deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of its laws.
36 So that any citizen of any portion of the Commonwealth would have the guarantee of
37 liberty and safety in regard to the processes of law, and also would have a guarantee of the
38 equal administration of the law as it exists. I think Mr. Isaacs will bear me out, that in the
39 United States it has been decided that the title to equal treatment under the law does not
40 mean that you cannot make a law which differentiates one class of the community from
41 another; but, as has been decided, it means that in the administration of the laws you have
42 made, all the citizens shall be treated equally. And that should be so. Whatever privilege
43 we give to our citizens, the administration of the law should be equal to all, whatever
44 their colour. The case I refer to is one of the Chinese cases-I forget the name of it.
45 Mr. ISAACS.-The case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 Would it not be appropriate that Albanese instead of having braindead words dropping from his
49 mouth he actually showed to be a competent “constitutional adviser”?
50
51 I was last week looking at a screen in Centrelink when I noticed that a screen showed opposition
52 to “racism”. Yet a few moments later it then goes on about “Aboriginals & Torres Strait
17-9-2024 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 Islanders”. Would it not be better to practice what you preach and do not discriminate amongst
2 Australians based upon colour of skin?
3
4 We seem to have mostly braindead people in the Parliaments who get into positions because of
5 other braindead people supporting them and it is time that this is cleaned out and we have real
6 intelligent people in government, that is a lawful government which is missing at Federal and
7 State levels.
8
9 Why not arrange for a Television debate that is Albanese and myself about constitutional issues
10 and expose how brain dead he is when it comes to the constitution.
11
12 Granted, the Commonwealth, as I stated all along, has certain legislative powers when it comes
13 to telecommunication, which includes the internet, however, it is nevertheless bound that it
14 cannot discriminate against a child merely for being less than a certain age. It is imperative for
15 the commonwealth to deny any child equal rights to FREEDOM OF SPEECH, etc.
16 The development of a child doesn’t just start at say age 16 but long before that. Hence, children
17 must not be denied access to the Internet merely because some incompetent person may
18 disregard their constitutional rights.
19 Obviously, the States have their own legislative power as to “civil rights” and may legislate as to
20 certain websites material such as pedophilia websites not to be accessible. But then why not also
21 reveal former Senator Bill Heffernan’s list of alleged pedophiles in the Parliament? You cannot
22 claim to be righteous when in fact acting precisely opposed to it. However, to ban a child merely
23 for being merely under the age of 16 in my view has no constitutional or legal basis.
24 It is the Federal Government that presided over the largest mis/disinformation campaign such as
25 the “covid scam” and as such is grossly incompetent to in a fair and proper manner evaluate
26 those exercising their FREEDOM OF SPEECH, etc, in an appropriate manner. To deny a child
27 proper recognition as to his/her constitutional rights is to ensure that they in return may neither
28 show respect to others!
29
30 Prior to the 2001 purported federal election I already intended to expose that neither the
31 Commonwealth and/or the States had any validly elected politicians and laws therefore are also
32 ULTRA VIRES ab initio. Well, since then the evidence had been building up more and more
33 how treasonous most politicians are! Again the “covid scam” is a clear example.
34
35 Let the rule of law prevail!
36
37 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
38
39 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
40 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

41 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

42 (Our name is our motto!)

17-9-2024 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati