Porous Graphene from Coconut Shells
Porous Graphene from Coconut Shells
Fahmi Fahmi, Nur Anggita Ayu Dewayanti, Widiyastuti Widiyastuti & Heru
Setyawan |
To cite this article: Fahmi Fahmi, Nur Anggita Ayu Dewayanti, Widiyastuti Widiyastuti & Heru
Setyawan | (2020) Preparation of porous graphene-like material from coconut shell charcoals
for supercapacitors, Cogent Engineering, 7:1, 1748962, DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
Page 1 of 9
Fahmi et al., Cogent Engineering (2020), 7: 1748962
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
Received: 26 December 2019 Abstract: High-surface area carbon with porous structure can provide a large electrical-
Accepted: 23 March 2020
double layer as energy storage in supercapacitors. Herein, porous graphene-like materials
*Corresponding author: Heru with high-surface area were prepared from renewable coconut shell charcoal via KOH
Setyawan, Department of Chemical
Engineering, Faculty of Industrial activation followed by oxidation in a harsh environment using a modified-Hummer
Technology, Sepuluh Nopember
Institute of Technology, Kampus ITS
method. Using the method, the surface area of the treated coconut shell charcoal
Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia. increased significantly from about 189.97 m2/g to 642.45 m2/g with a pore diameter of
E-mail: [email protected]
approximately 5 nm. As expected, the increase in surface area increased the capacitance
Reviewing editor: significantly, by up to 46-fold, from 3.22 to 148.20 F/g. These results demonstrated that
Harvey Arellano-Garcia,
Brandenburgische Technische the low cost renewable porous graphene-like material prepared from coconut shell
Universitat Cottbus-Senftenberg,
GERMANY charcoals is promising for use as electrode material for supercapacitor.
Additional information is available at Subjects: Materials Science; Nanoscience & Nanotechnology; Chemical Engineering
the end of the article
Keywords: coconut shell; hard carbon; supercapacitor; graphene-like; renewable biomass
1. Introduction
Supercapacitors have attracted considerable attention due to their high-power density, long cycle life, and fast
charging time that make them the promising power source in electronic equipment and hybrid electrical
vehicles. The energy storage in supercapacitors can be in the form of electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs)
or fast and reversible Faradaic reactions (pseudocapacitors). Carbon materials have been recommended as
the most promising candidates for supercapacitors (Sun et al., 2013), and in the case of EDLCs, activated
carbon has been the most widely used as the electrode material (Ghosh et al., 2019) (Zhao et al., 2011).
Activated carbon is low cost because it can be prepared easily from abundantly available and low cost
© 2020 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons
Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Page 2 of 9
Fahmi et al., Cogent Engineering (2020), 7: 1748962
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
renewable natural resources such as biowastes, sawdust, coconut shell, bamboo, etc. A wide variety of
renewable natural resources have been used to prepare carbon-based electrodes for supercapacitors including
ginkgo leaves (Zhu et al., 2018), Rose (Zhao et al., 2018), wheat straw (Gou et al., 2020), and bamboo (Yang
et al., 2014). The capacitance or storage performance of activated carbon-based supercapacitors is greatly
dependent on the specific surface area of the active material and the charge accumulates at the electrode/
electrolyte interface (Przygocki et al., 2018). The poor conductivity and a huge amount of micropores in
activated carbons hinder the ion and electron transport, which in turn, deteriorate significantly the capacitance
performance at high rates (Sun et al., 2013). To overcome the poor electrical conductivity of activated carbon,
the activated carbon is generally graphitized. However, graphitization leads to reduce the specific surface area.
Recently, hard carbons, a type of disordered carbon material and non-graphitizable, have gained much
attention for use as electrode materials for EDLCs (Ghosh et al., 2019). Hard carbons can be produced by
carbonization of various biomasses such as cellulose, coconut shell, charcoal, etc. Coconut shells, consisting
mainly of cellulose fibers, are biomass waste which is abundantly available in Indonesia and widely distributed
in the earth. They are typically used as raw material to produce charcoal by carbonization in a limited-oxygen
environment for use as either domestic or industrial uses. Coconut shell charcoal is hard carbon and because of
that it can be a potential candidate for conversion into electrode material used in supercapacitors.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The coconut shell charcoal (CSC) were obtained from local market in Surabaya, Indonesia. The
proximate composition analysis of the CSC is shown in Table 1. All chemicals used to prepare the
graphene from the CSC were reagent grade and used without further purification. The sulfuric acid
(H2SO4; 98.0%) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; 30%) were supplied by Merck. The sodium nitrate
(NaNO3; 99.5%) was purchased from SAP Chemical. The potassium permanganate (KMnO4; 99.5%)
and potassium hydroxide (KOH; 99.5%) were purchased from UNI-Chem, Indonesia.
2.2. Synthesis
Prior to use, CSC was ground and sieved to a particle size of approximately 125 μm. The CSC
particles were mixed with KOH solids and ground in an agate mortar. The weight ratio of CSC:KOH
was 1:4. The CSC-KOH mixture was placed in a ceramic boat and introduced into an alumina tube
of tubular furnace. Nitrogen (UHP) gas was flowing during the thermal treatment, which was
carried out successively at 400°C for 1 h and 800°C for 3 h. The heater was turned off, and the
sample was cooled naturally to room temperature, washed with successively 20 wt.% H2SO4 and
deionized water, and dried in an oven at 80°C for 12 h. The dried sample, hereafter will be referred
to as activated carbon (AC), was used as raw materials to produce graphene-like material.
2Graphene-like material was prepared using a modified Hummers approach (Vieira et al., 2016). Two
grams of AC and 2 g of NaNO3 were put into 92 mL of 98.0% H2SO4 in a beaker glass placed in an ice bath
and stirred by a magnetic stirrer. After 30 min, 10 g of KMnO4 was added and the temperature was
Page 3 of 9
Fahmi et al., Cogent Engineering (2020), 7: 1748962
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
increased to 40°C by putting the mixture in a water bath. After 40 min, 100 mL deionized water was added
slowly (in an ice bath) to avoid a rapid temperature raise and it was allowed in the ice bath (~5°C) for 3 h.
Then, it was heated to 35°C and kept at this temperature for 15 min. After that, 100 mL of demineralized
water was added slowly, and the mixture was cooled down to ~5°C and kept at this temperature for
15 min. Fifteen milliliters of H2O2 was added slowly until no bubble could be observed anymore. The solids
were separated from the mixture by a centrifuge, washed subsequently with HCl solution and deionized
water and dried in an oven at 80°C. The sample was denoted as AC-H. For reference, CSC was directly
treated with the same procedure as above and the sample was labeled as CSC-H.
To enhance further the surface properties, the AC-H was reduced by citric acid at high temperature
using the procedure described as follows. The GO in the amount of 5 mg were dispersed in 20 mL of
deionized water and its pH was adjusted to 9 by adding 1 M NH4OH aqueous solution. Then, 4 g of citric
acid as reducing agent for the AC-H was added to the mixture. The mixture was heated in a tubular
furnace at 950°C under flowing nitrogen gas for 120 min. After the heater was turned off, the solid sample
cooled naturally to room temperature. The sample was denoted as AC-H-R.
2.3. Characterization
Crystal structures of graphene were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD; PANalytical X’Pert Pro, The
Netherlands) using Cu Kα radiations (λ = 1.54 Å). Infrared and Raman spectra were recorded using,
respectively, a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrophotometer (IRTracer-100, Shimadzu, Japan)
and a Raman Spectroscopy (XploraPlus, Olympus, Japan). The specific surface area was measured by
multi-point nitrogen adsorption at its boiling point (Nova 1200, Quantachrome, US). The samples were
degassed at 300°C under flowing nitrogen for 3 h prior to the measurements. The specific surface area was
calculated by Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) method. The pore volume was taken at the relative pressure
approaching unity. The pore size was estimated by Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method.
A well-known Hummer method is the most common methods to prepare graphene by exfoliation of
graphite. Since the structure of carbon in the activated carbon was disordered graphitic, a harsh oxidation
using the modified-Hummer method might be used to treat the activated carbon to have properties like
Page 4 of 9
Fahmi et al., Cogent Engineering (2020), 7: 1748962
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
graphene. Figure 2 shows the effect of particle size on the XRD patterns of AC treated with the modified-
Hummer method (AC-H). As expected, the diffraction peaks appeared in the original activated carbon still
exist after it was treated with the modified-Hummer method. The diffraction peak broadened when the
initial particle size decreased (from 35 to 200 mesh). As mentioned above, grinding may influence the
disorder structure of carbon. The smaller the size was, the more intense the grinding was. As a result, the
carbon structure became more disorder as shown by the broader diffraction peaks, and in the case of 200
mesh the peak at 43° nearly disappears. The broader peak at 24° indicates the structure similar to the
stacked structure of graphite oxide (Toh et al., 2014).
Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of the activated carbon treated with only the modified-Hummer
method (AC-H) and the modified-Hummer method plus reduction using citric acid (AC-H-R). As
discussed above, the XRD pattern of AC-H shows a broad peak at around 24° indicating the material
has a stacked structure of graphite oxide. On the other hand, the peak was slightly shifted to 23.3°
when the material was reduced with citric acid (AC-H-R), and the peak at 43° completely disappeared.
The diffraction pattern is similar to that of the reduced graphene oxide (rGO) (De Silva et al., 2017).
Thus, it seems that rGO can be prepared from activated carbon by subsequently treated it with the
modified-Hummer method and citric acid reduction at high temperature.
Figure 4 presents the Raman spectra of the activated carbon treated with: (a) the modified-Hummer
method (AC-H) and (b) the modified-Hummer method plus reduction using citric acid (AC-H-R). There are
three peaks in the Raman spectra of the two samples which are at around 1362 cm–1 (D band), 1569 cm–1
Page 5 of 9
Fahmi et al., Cogent Engineering (2020), 7: 1748962
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
(G band), and 2743 cm–1 (2D band). The peaks can be attributed to graphitic structure of RGO (Sun et al.,
2013). The D-band indicates the presence of defects in the graphitic materials due to bond-angle
disorder, bond-length disorder, vacancies edge defects, etc. On the other hand, G-band is related to
the stretching motion of the pairs of carbon sp2 atoms while the broad peak in 2D-band indicates the
number of layers formed (Dubale et al., 2014). The intensity of the D band is smaller after reduction that
may be due to the breaking of the stacking order due to the reduction reaction (Khrisnamoorthy et al.,
2013). Based on Broad peak in 2D-band, it shows that AC-H has more than one layer (Shui et al., 2015).
Table 2 presents the porosity properties of various carbon samples based on coconut shell charcoal.
It can be seen that the surface area tends to increase after each tretment. The increase in surface area
after the treatment may also confirm the formation of multi-layer. The surface area of coconut shell
charcoal was 189.97 m2/g. It increased to 496.03 m2/g after being successively activated with KOH and
oxidized with the modified-Hummer method (AC-H). The surface area increased further 642.50 m2/g
after it was reduced with citric acid (AC-H-R). The pore volume had the same tendency as the surface
area while the pore diameter was relatively unchanged after each treatment.
Figure 5 shows the FTIR spectra of coconut shell charcoal (CSC) and the coconut charcoal treated by
different treatments. The spectrum of CSC had a peak at 873 and 1615 cm–1 corresponding to C=C
bond (aromatic group) (Zeng et al., 2011). The C=C bond was broken after the charcoal was activated
with KOH (AC) and further with the modified-Hummer method (AC-H) and citric acid reduction (AC-
H-R) as indicated by the disappearance of the band after the treatment. For all samples treated with
only the modified-Hummer method or further with citric acid reduction, there are peaks at 2890, 1049
and 830 cm–1 that can be attributed to, respectively, C-H groups, C-O groups, and C-N groups (Tang
et al., 2012). All functional groups are the typical groups encountered in GO or rGO. Thus, it can be
assumed that graphene-like material had been successfully prepared from coconut shell charcoal by
first activation and followed by the modified-Hummer method plus citric acid reduction.
Page 6 of 9
Fahmi et al., Cogent Engineering (2020), 7: 1748962
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
The specific capacitance values were calculated from the CVs using the equation
2òIdV
C¼ (1)
msR
where I is the cathodic current, V is the applied potential, m is the electrode mass, s is the scan rate and
R is the scan range of applied potential. The specific capacitance values of CSC, AC-H, H-AC and AC-
H-R calculated from Figure 6 using Equation (1) were 3.22, 49.38, 86.32, and 148.20 F/g, respectively.
The specific capacitance could be improved from 3.22 F/g to 49.38 and 86.32 F/g by activating the CSC
followed with oxidizing using the modified-Hummer method (AC-H) and oxidizing using the modified-
Hummer method followed by calcination (H-AC). The specific capacitance could be enhanced further
from 86.32 to 148.20 F/g by reducing AC-H with citric acid (AC-H-R). The specific capacitance of carbon-
based electrodes derived from natural resources reported in the published literature is typically in the
range from 100 to 479 F/g (Ghosh et al., 2019). The high specific capacitance indicates that AC-
H-R sample prepared from coconut shell charcoal using successively treatments of activation, oxida-
tion, and reduction is a promising material for supercapacitor.
Page 7 of 9
Fahmi et al., Cogent Engineering (2020), 7: 1748962
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
4. Conclusion
It has been demonstrated that porous graphene-like materials with high-surface area can be prepared from
renewable coconut shell charcoal via KOH activation followed by oxidation in a harsh environment using a modified-
Hummer method. The surface area of the treated coconut shell charcoal increased significantly from about
189.97 m2/g to 642.45 m2/g with a pore diameter of approximately 5 nm. The increase in surface area leads to an
increase in the capacitance of this material in 1 M Na2S2O3 significantly from 3.22 F/g for coconut shell charcoal to
148.20 F/g for graphene-like material. These results demonstrated that the low cost renewable porous graphene-like
material prepared from coconut shell charcoals is promising for use as electrode material for supercapacitor.
Page 8 of 9
Fahmi et al., Cogent Engineering (2020), 7: 1748962
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1748962
Gou, G., Huang, F., Jiang, M., Li, J., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Toh, S. Y., Loh, K. S., Kamarudin, S. K., & Wan Daud, W. R.
Hierarchical porous carbon electrode materials for (2014). Graphene production via electrochemical
supercapacitor developed from wheat straw cellulo- reduction of graphene oxide; Synthesis and
sic foam. Renewable Energy, 149, 208–2016. https:// characterization. Chemical Engineering Journal, 251,
doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.150 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.004
Khrisnamoorthy, K., Veerapandian, M., Yun, K., & Kim, S. J. Vieira, M. A., Gonvcalves, G. R., Cipriano, D. F., Schettino, M. A.,
(2013). The chemical and structural analysis of gra- Filho, E. A. S., Cunha, A. G., Emmerich, F. G., & Freitas, J. C. C.
phene oxide with different degrees of oxidation. (2016). Synthesis of graphite oxide from milled graphite stu-
Carbon, 53, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon. died by solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Carbon,
2012.10.013 98, 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.037
Pradhan, B. K., & Sandle, N. K. (1999). Effect of different Yang, C.-S., Jang, Y. S., & Jeong, H. K. (2014). Bamboo-based
oxidizing agent treatments on the surface properties activated carbon for supercapacitor applications.
of activated carbons. Carbon, 37(8), 1323–1332. Current Applied Physics, 14(12), 1616–1620. https://doi.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00328-5 org/10.1016/j.cap.2014.09.021
Przygocki, P., Abbas, Q., & Beguin, F. (2018). Capacitance Zeng, F., Sun, Z., Sang, X., Diamond, D., Lau, K. T., Liu, X., &
enhancement of hybrid electrochemical capacitor with Su, S. (2011). In situ one-step electrochemical pre-
asymmetric carbon electrodes configuration in neutral paration of graphene oxide nanosheet-modified
aqueous electrolyte. Electrochimica Acta, 269, 640–648. electrodes for biosensors. ChemSusChem, 4(11),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.03.016 587–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201100319
Shui, J., Wang, M., Du, F., & Dai, L. (2015). N-doped carbon Zhao, B., Song, J. L., Xu, W., Fang, T., Jiao, Z., Zhang, H., &
nanomaterials as durable catalysts for oxygen reduction Jiang, Y. (2011). Monolayer graphene/NiO nanosheets
reaction in acidic fuel cells. Science Advances, 1(1), 1–7. with two-dimension structure for supercapacitors.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400129 Journal of Materials Chemistry, 21(46), 18792–18798.
Sun, L., Tian, C., Li, M., Meng, X., Wang, L., Wang, R., Yin, J., https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm13016a
& Fu, H. (2013). From coconut shell to porous Zhao, C., Huang, Y., Zhao, C., Shao, X., & Zhu, Z. (2018). Rose-
graphene-like nanosheets for high-power derived 3D carbon nanosheets for high cyclability and
supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 23 extended voltage supercapacitors. Electrochimica Acta, 291,
(21), 6462–6470. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta10897j 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.136
Tang, Y., Huang, F., Zhao, W., Liu, Z., & Wan, D. (2012). Zhu, X., Yu, S., Xu, K., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Lou, G., Wu, Y., Zhu, E.,
Synthesis of graphene-supported Li4Ti5O12 Chen, H., Shen, Z., Bao, B., & Fu, S. (2018). Sustainable acti-
nanosheets for high rate battery application. Journal vated carbons from dead ginkgo leaves for supercapacitor
of Materials Chemistry, 22(22), 11257–11260. https:// electrode active materials. Chemical Engineering Science,
doi.org/10.1039/c2jm30624g 181, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.02.004
© 2020 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Cogent Engineering (ISSN: 2331-1916) is published by Cogent OA, part of Taylor & Francis Group.
Publishing with Cogent OA ensures:
• Immediate, universal access to your article on publication
• High visibility and discoverability via the Cogent OA website as well as Taylor & Francis Online
• Download and citation statistics for your article
• Rapid online publication
• Input from, and dialog with, expert editors and editorial boards
• Retention of full copyright of your article
• Guaranteed legacy preservation of your article
• Discounts and waivers for authors in developing regions
Submit your manuscript to a Cogent OA journal at www.CogentOA.com
Page 9 of 9