Methyl Group Impact in Drug Design
Methyl Group Impact in Drug Design
Figure 1. Representative drug and clinical candidate molecules containing methyl group
Compound 1 was identified as a potent and selective JAK3 covalent inhibitor. However,
it suffers from moderate to poor PK in rat despite very reasonable oxidative stability
as judged by liver microsomes. It was speculated that glutathione-S-transferase (GST)
mediated glutathione (GSH) addition to the acrylamide is accounted for this
discrepancy. Stability of compound 1 in rat blood is only 98 min, which explained the
observed poor PK profile in rat. In order to decrease GSH addition, the team attempted
to inhibit chemical reactivity by adding substituents to the acrylamide, as steric hinder
around the electrophile should reduce the ability of GST to catalyze GSH addition. As
depicted in Figure 2, methyl groups were introduced on piperidine ring adjacent to
acrylamide in compound 2, 3 and 4. Compound 2 lost potency completely due to a
potential steric clash between the methyl group with protein side chain residue
Leu956 in the ATP pocket. The hypothesis was realized in compound 3 which displayed
comparable enzymatic potency and 3-fold higher HWB potency which was consistent
with higher stability in HWB assay. It was interesting to found that chirality of the
methyl group impacted potency significantly, as seen in compound 4 where the methyl
group had an opposite chirality, resulting in potency loss completely. [9-10]
As shown in Figure 1, there was also a chiral methyl group on piperazine ring in
chemical structure of Sotorasib. In the course of discovery of Sotorasib, compound 10
was identified as one of promising hit compounds with high potency. However, PK
profile was poor (data not shown). Employing similar strategy in the discovery of
compound 8 (AZD3759, Zorifertinib) described above (Figure 3), a chiral methyl group
was incorporated on piperazine ring in compound 11 which had increased cellular
potency by 3-fold while oral bioavailability was improved (F = 12%). Comparing
compound 12 and 13, the same trend was observed with cellular potency and oral
bioavailability both increased, especially oral bioavailability, in compound 13 bearing
a chiral methyl group on piperazine ring (Figure 4). [8]
Figure 4. Methyl groups on piperazine ring modulated potency and PK profile of KARS G12C
inhibitors.
In the course of discovery of a potent and reversible dual orexin receptor antagonist,
compound 14 was identified as a promising lead. As shown in Figure 5, both trans-
methyl groups in compound 15 and 16 increased potency significantly by 96-fold for
OX1R, 145-fold for OX2R and by 505-fold for OX1R, 6-fold for OX2R respectively. This
observation is consistent with structural hypothesis that alpha-methylation favors the
trans-diaxially substituted piperidine with axial orientation for the 3-CH2OAr group. [11]
Figure 7. Methyl groups with opposite chirality impacted potency in different way.
Figure 8. Methyl groups on aniline increased potency by at least 10-fold. (PDB code: 6T3C)
With lead compound 31 in hand, the team turned their attention to modification of
the benzylic linker, based on hypothesis that the incorporation of an appropriate
substituent on the alpha-position of the benzylic amine liker could constrain the linker
to adopt the bioactive conformation and, therefore reduce the entropic cost of ligand
binding. Moreover, methyl substitution could also block the metabolism at the alpha-
position of then benzylic group. Based on modeling, the methyl-substituted linker with
(S) stereochemistry is more conformationally constrained, and the bioactive
conformation is still near an energy minimum. This extra constraint on the linker
conformation would be expected to modestly improve the potency. By contrast, the
(R) enantiomer is expected to be substantially less potent, because it has an energy
minimum that does not resemble the bioactive conformation observed in the crystal
structure. For the (R) enantiomer to adopt the bioactive conformation, there would be
a steric clash between the methyl group and the carbonyl oxygen of the quinolinone.
As X-ray structure of analogue suggests that the protein can only accommodate a small
group in the vicinity of the benzylic group linker, the team selected and investigated
small methyl group in compound 32 and compound 33. As depicted in Figure 10, the
(S)-methyl group in compound 33 was favored, whereas the (R)-methyl group in
compound 32 lost most of its activity. Compound 33 also demonstrated excellent
metabolic stability in human microsome and improved solubility. Taken together, the
data showed that an (S)-methyl-substituted benzylic linker in compound 33 was the
optimal choice, not only providing very potent inhibitory activity against the R132H
and R132C mutants but also conferring excellent metabolic stability and enhanced
solubility (Figure 10). [14] In this context, amine building blocks containing chiral methyl
groups at alpha-position of benzylic linker played critical roles in quick synthesis of
designed molecules.
Figure 10. Methyl group at alpha-benzylic position impacted activity and properties.
It was observed from crystal structure of compound 34 bound to FXIa that a water
molecule was located between the thiazole ring of compound 34 and Leu415, which
precluded tight binding and resulted in the loss of potency. Hence, displacement of
this water molecule by the inhibitor should lead to a significant free-energy gain. This
prediction was validated by compound 35 with a methyl substituent on the thiazole
ring, which indeed displaced the unstable water and improved the FIXa inhibitory
potency by 20-fold (Figure 11). [15]
S N S N
N N N N N N
N -O N N -O N
N N+ N N+
F Cl F Cl
34 35
FXIa Ki = 6.4 nM FXIa Ki = 0.3 nM
Figure 11. A methyl increased potency by displacing unstable water molecule. PDB code: 7V14
and 7V15.
In the course of discovery of PCSK9 inhibitor MK-0616, the addition of an alpha-Me
proline to the peptide 37 provided two advantages over proline peptide 36: 1) 8-fold
potency enhancement, and 5-fold stability in mouse whole blood (Figure 12). [16]
O
O
N O
H
O N
N+ O NH
N N Cl- O
N
H
O O O NH OH HN
O O H F
N N
NH
36 37 O N O
O
proline alpha-Me-proline O O
LDLR Ki = 110 nM LDLR Ki = 14 nM HN
N
MWB T1/2 = 63 min MWB T1/2 = 311 min O O
HN
MK-0616
Figure 12. alpha-Me proline improved both potency and stability in whole blood.
Based on the known preference of structural motifs present in CYP substrates, it was
hypothesized that the observed CYP2D6 inhibition of compound 38 was caused by the
basic nitrogen present in the pyridine ring connected to the core at the C8-position
serving as heme-ligating moiety. Therefore, steric shielding could be employed to
address this critical issue. Introduction of steric bulkiness next to the basic nitrogen in
compounds 39, 40 and 41 greatly reduced CYP2D6 inhibition, with IC50 values in the
low nM range determined for compound 38 while becoming > 350-fold weaker and
reading out in the uM range as methyl groups were introduced next to the nitrogen
(Figure 13). [17]
Comparing compounds 42 and 43, the binding affinity of JAK1 was markedly improved
when a trans-methyl was introduced to the C2-position of piperidine. It is clear that
the “magic methyl” effect exists. The methyl substituent on piperidine occupies the
tiny hydrophobic pocket around the middle of the ATP-binding pocket of JAK1,
according to the docking analysis. The methyl group on the piperidine of Tofacitinib
also occupies this binding pocket (Preface). Addition of a meta-Cl on benzyl ring of
compound 44 further increased potency. The cis-isomer 45 displayed greater potency
than trans-isomer 44 (Figure 14). [18]
Figure 14. Methyl on the piperidine ring increased potency by occupying a hydrophobic pocket.
Compound 46 was identified as a potent 5HT2B agonist with an EC50 of 160 nM. As
5HT2B agonist activity has been strongly implicated in valvular heart disease, the team
focused optimization to remove this deleterious off-target activity. A working model
based on a published structure was developed. The team hypothesized that there
would a closed side of the pocket where substitution on piperidine would be less
tolerated. Addition of a methyl on 4-position of piperidine ring of Darovasertib
dramatically reduced 5HT2B potency. This was in line with the hypothesis that the
piperidine ring would be bound in a closed side of the 5HT2B pocket, and this
additional steric bulk in this region would not be tolerated for 5HT2B agonism (Figure
15). [19]
Given the presence of a small hydrophobic pocket around cyclobutane ring, the
removal of the methyl on cyclobutane ring in compound 48 led to a 4-fold drop in
potency as displayed by compound 47. It was also observed that stability in human
liver microsome was decreased caused by removal of the methyl group. This can be
explained that the methyl blocks metabolism site on cyclobutane ring (Figure 16). [20]
H H
N O N O
N N
F3C N F3C N
N N
47 48
IC50 = 340 nM IC50 = 85 nM
HLM CL = 14 uL/min/mg HLM CL = 2.5 uL/min/mg
Figure 16. A methyl on cyclobutane ring increased both potency and stability in human liver
microsome. PDB code: 8QTG
Figure 18. A methyl group improved potency by occupying a small pocket. PDB code: 8VEU
Discovery of covalent inhibitors is often associated with low GSH stability issue, as
displayed by compound 55. Like the case shown in Figure 2, a methyl group was
introduced on cyclobutane ring in compounds 56 and 57 respectively. This strategy
worked very well in compound 57 with GSH stability increased significantly, while GSH
stability increased slightly for compound 56 (Figure 19). [23]
N N N
O O O O O O
N N N
N N N N N N
N N N
N N N
55 56 57
GSH T1/2 = 2.4 h GSH T1/2 = 4.2 h GSH T1/2 = 15 h
N N
N N
O O
NH2
N N
N N
N N N N
O O
N N
58 59
HER2WT pHER2 IC50 = 41 nM HER2WT pHER2 IC50 = 100 nM
HER2YVMA pHER2 IC50 = 29 nM HER2YVMA pHER2 IC50 = 44 nM
MDCK MDR1 ER = 8.1 MDCK MDR1 ER = 1.3
Figure 20. A methyl group reduced reflux ratio while keeping comparable potency. PDB code:
8U8X
Comparing compounds 62 and 63, the methyl on core structure increased potency by
almost 100-fold, and chirality preference was observed by comparing compounds 63
and 64 (Figure 22). [26]
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O
Boc Boc Boc Boc Boc Boc Boc Boc
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O
Boc Boc Boc Boc Boc Boc Boc Boc
O
OH N N N
N N
N
N N N N N N
N N N N Br H 2N Br
N N H2N Br
Br Cl Cl
N Cl
N N N N N
N N N
N N N N N
N N Br N N
Br Br N
Br
Cl Cl Cl Cl Br
N N N N
COOEt Cl N N N N
N N N N N H H
N N Cl N
Br Cl Cl Cl Cl
N H H
N N N N
N N
Cl N N
N N Cl N N H N N N
H H H Cl N