Definitions

Environment Impact Assessment is a process of analyzing the positive and negative effects of
a proposed project, plan, or activity on the environment. This may include studies on the
weather, flora and fauna, soil, human health including physical, social, biological, economic and
cultural impacts. It is one of those measures taken to ensure that development is sustainable.

Environment Impact Study is a study conducted to determine the possible environmental

impacts of a proposed policy, project or activity and measures to mitigate any such impacts.

The Environment Impact Statement is a report made when an environment impact study has
been conducted.

Environment Monitoring: Is the continuous assessment and determination of the actual

potential effects of any activity on the environment.

Environmental Auditing: Is the process undertaken to check compliance with environmental

policies and legislative environmental requirements to check risk and expose them for correction.

A Developer refers to a person or group of persons, agency or firm developing a new project or
proposing to extend an existing project, which is subject to the EIA process.

The Impact is the adverse or beneficial effect of any action on one or more elements of the
natural, social and economic environment.

Direct Impacts are caused by actions, which generally occur at the same time and place as the
activity of the project in question.

Indirect Impacts are those that induce changes in the natural environment, population,
economic growth, land use etc. as a result of actions not directly linked to the project in question.

1
Indirect Impacts are those that induce changes in the natural environment, population,
economic growth, land use etc. as a result of actions not directly linked to the project in question.

The Lead Agency is defined as any ministry, parastatal or Local Govel11ment system in whom
any law vests functions of control or management of any section of the environment.

Mitigation measures refers to actions which reduce, avoid or off set the potential adverse
environmental consequences of a project for example, engineering works, technological
developments, management ways and means of making better the effects to the environment and
losses suffered by individuals including compensation where damage has been done and
resettlement in case of displacement.

Screening is the process of determining what level of environment impact assessment is required
for a particular activity or project.

Significant effects are substantial or potentially substantial adverse changes in any of the
physical factors of the surroundings of humans including water, soil, atmosphere, biological
factors of animals and plants and the social factor of beauty which includes both the natural and
built environment.

Stakeholders refer to those who are affected or likely to be affected by the outcome of a
proposed project, whether positively or negatively.

Public hearing is a public inquiry into the environment impact statement.

A "no action alternative" describes the option of not proceeding with any action and provides a
vital baseline for the comparison with other altematives.

Project defines an action or activity that leads to projects with an impact on the environment.

Project brief is a summary statement of the likely environmental effects of a proposed

development.

Executive Director refers to the Executive Director of the National Environment Management
Authority (NEMA).

2
3
 Chapter One
1.1 Introduction

Monitoring of projects after EIA has been conducted is essential as this will ensure that the
mitigation measures and other conditionalities set out by the developer in the EIA are complied
with.

The environmental law framework lays down the basic legal provisions for Environmental
Impact Study regulation among other things. The regulation of activities that have or are likely to
have an impact on the environment is one of the vital components of environmental law.
Principal issues related to this aspect include environmental impact assessment, environmental
auditing and environmental monitoring.

Environmental legislation is however not the only tool for environmental management. Other
factors such as general policy and education awareness are equally important.
This guide is intended to assist developers and the private sector to comply with the law and also
help them understand EIA to avoid possible contravention of the law, to make informed
decisions and to avoid losses by ensuring that they do not undertake environmentally harmful
projects.

1.2 An Overview of the EIA Process in Uganda

The concept of EIA is not new in Uganda. Before the enactment of the National Environment
Statute (NES) in 1995, EIA was not a legal requirement although there were some provisions
that were contained in various enactments such as the Urban Planning Act and the Investment
Code among others. These enactments provided opportunities to incorporate environmental
considerations into development. However they have not been implemented in a way that
promotes comprehensive assessment of environmental issues in planning and do not expressly
tackle EIA but have provisions that embraced it.

EIA has become an increasingly familiar environmental management tool as a result of pressure
that is mounted on companies, industries to improve upon their environmental performance. It is
now a common tool in the developed countries and is increasingly being applied in Uganda and
other developing countries by foreign and local investors. It is applied to a range of industrial
and commercial activities; from small through medium to large scale establishments.

Until very recently, assessments were mainly done by foreign consultants and the costs met by
the developers. NEMA now has a technical team which is charged with providing EIA expertise
for all projects.
Most districts in Uganda now have environmental officers and committees charged with
handling environmental matters in their jurisdictions. Some municipalities, Ministries and
government departments have established environmental offices to handle environmental
matters. Such environmental committees are also found in schools and institutions allover the
country. This kind of awareness raising will greatly improve upon the efficiency and
effectiveness of the EIA process, its monitoring and compliance in the country.

4
1.3. Environment Impact Assessment (EIA).

EIA is a process of analyzing the positive and negative effects of a proposed project, plan, or
activity on the environment. This may include studies on the weather, flora and fauna, soil,
human health including physical, social, biological, economic and cultural impacts. It is one of
those measures taken to ensure that development is sustainable. An EIA should be conducted
before the commencement of a project. By studying the possible impact that the project may
have on the environment, it is possible to eliminate or avoid adverse impacts or costs that would
be met after damage by either redesigning the project or by taking mitigation measures.

EIA must be exhaustive and comprehensive and must give due consideration to all alternatives
including the "no action" altematives.

1.3.1 For whom is EIA written?

EIA is made for the:

i) developers /Project Proponents;
ii) Project Approving Agency /lead agency;
iii) Public; and
iv) Private sector including bankers or financiers

If written for the public, an EIA must be in a language simple and brief enough to be understood
by the ordinary person, otherwise it will not serve its purpose. Its purpose is to inform these
actors about the project, its environmental consequences, environmentally friendly options and
why the project is preferred to those options.

If an EIA is meant to inform, it must be written in a simple and brief language, in a fully
representative format. If meant for the developer, it must be formatted in such a way that
complicated scientific and other technocratic information is easy to digest.

EIA must contain enough information to enable decision-makers to make a well-informed

decision, or else it can be challenged in courts as being inadequate.

1.3.2 Functions of EIA

i) The primary function of EIA is to avail to both the developer and the authorities such as
NEMA and the Town Planners, the opportunity to choose projects with full knowledge of their
impact on the environment. It also enables the relevant authorities to decide whether to allow the
project to proceed or not. This will save the developer time and costs that would have been
incurred and enables him to develop plans and policies for the mitigation of such impacts.

ii) EIA enables developers and decision makers to predict and assess the potential impacts of the
project on the well-being of the natural environment and also helps them identify alternatives
through recommending the implementation of appropriate modifications / actions that integrate
economic, social and environmental concerns.

iii) EIA can help improve the credibility and also portrays a good corporate image for an

5
organization as an environmentally responsible organization to the general public including
government agencies and employees. For instance, the City Pharmacy uses recycled paper for its
packaging, MTN now uses environmental friendly airtime cards which when disposed of, are not
a threat to the environment.

iv) The EIA process is also of great benefit to banks and other financial institutions that extend
credit to their clients. It is a means by which the institution can protect its investment by ensuring
that the project fulfils all planning and legal requirements, particularly with regard to
environmental concerns.

There have been instances where credit has been extended to developers with no assessment of
the environmental impact and in due course the project is stopped from operating for failing to
meet the requisite standards, with significant losses to the lending institution.

For example, The Freba Tannery pictured above in Kakoba, Mbarara was closed down for
failure to prevent pollution of the environment by untreated effluent (see adjacent pond). An EIA
would have identified the need to put into place a system for the treatment and disposal of
effluent.

An EIA is also important to ensure the safety of both the workers and the public.

v) An EIA is designed to enable the environmental effects of a project to be weighed on a

common yardstick with economic costs and benefits. EIA is good for planners as it enables them
to make environmentally and economically viable decisions during planning and to choose
whether to continue or discontinue with such projects that are likely to have an impact on the
environment.

vi) It is a legal requirement for any project that is likely to have adverse effects on the
environment to carry out an EIA. Hence any developer found to contravene the law will have
legal action taken against him or her.

6
 Chapter Two

2.0 Legal Framework of the EIA Process in Uganda.

2.1 Constitutional Aspects related to EIA

The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda of 1995 provides among its National Objectives,
(Objective No. XXVII) that:

i) Utilization of natural resources shall be managed in such a way as to meet the

development and environmental needs of the present and future generations of Uganda,
particularly taking all measures to prevent or minimize damage and destruction to land,
air, water resources resulting from pollution or any other kind of natural resource
degradation.

ii) the state shall promote sustainable development and public awareness of the need to
manage land, air and water resources in a balanced manner for present and future
generations.

Article 39 provides that every Ugandan has a right to a clean and healthy environment. Article
237(b) in turn, provides that the government or Local Government as determined by Parliament
by law shall hold in trust for the people and protect natural lakes, rivers, wetlands, f0.orests,
game and forest reserves, National Parks and any land to be reserved for ecological and to
touristic purposes for the common good of all citizens. This right carries with it the duty of the
citizen to protect the environment.

2.2 The National Environment Statute (NES) No.4 of 1995

The NES provides for public in-put in EIA, and environmental audits through the rights to
participate, to information and the general right to bring actions to prevent or discontinue an
activity or project with effects that are harmful to the environment. It also empowers local
environmental committees to take action to redress local environmental concerns.

The Statute creates a duty on the developer to take all measures necessary to seek the views of
the people in the communities, which may be affected by the project during the process of
conducting the study.

Major provisions for the EIA process in the NES are contained under part V that defines and
sets out the role and procedures of the EIA process for all activities likely to harm or have an
impact on the environment.
The EIA legal framework under the NES is summarized as follows;

1. A developer of a project is required to submit a project brief to the Lead Agency.

2. Where the development described in the brief is considered to have or likely to have any
impact on the environment, an EIA shall be undertaken by the developer of the project.

7
3. Where the project is likely to have an impact on the environment, an environmental impact
evaluation shall be conducted.

4. Where an environment impact assessment finds that the project will have a significant impact
on the environment and after considering the environmental impact review or the environmental
impact evaluation, an environmental impact study shall be conducted.

Section 4 gives every person a right to a healthy environment and a duty to maintain and enhance
the environment including the duty to inform the authority of all activities likely to harm the
environment. Therefore the public has a right to know what a developer is doing or intends to do.
Furthermore, the Local Environmental Committees are empowered to:

-bring actions against any person whose activities are likely to have a significant impact on the
environment to prevent, stop or discontinue such acts,
- to compel any public officer to take measures to prevent, stop or discontinue such acts,
- request that a court order for taking measures that would ensure that environment does not
suffer damage is issued,
- and to ensure that such activities are subjected to environmental monitoring.

Environmental Restoration orders

Section 72 obliges court in any proceedings brought by any person, to issue an environmental
restoration order against any person who has harmed, is harming or is likely to harm the
environment. An environmental restoration order may act as an anticipatory measure when used
as a means of preventing persons from taking any action which would or is reasonably likely to
cause harm to the environment.

The order is used as a means of redress when issued to cause restoration of the environment as
near as it may be to the state in which it was before the action was taken; or when issued to
award compensation to persons harmed by the said action, or authorized persons who have
incurred costs in the restoration of the environment.

However, where it is satisfied that an environmental impact review or an environmental impact

evaluation conducted does not disclose possible significant impact on the environment, then the
environmental aspects of the project may be approved.

Implementation of the above summarized provisions can only be possible if there are
implemented regulations that are expressed in a precise, practical and understandable manner.

2.3 The National Environment (Wetlands, Riverbanks and Lake-Shore Management)

Regulations, No.3 of 2000.

Provisions of the EIA under these regulations are contained in Part IV.
These provide that;

a developer desiring to put up a project which may have a significant impact on a wetland,
riverbank or lakeshore, is required to carry out an EIA [reg.34].

8
the developer shall carry out annual audits and monitoring of such activities that may impact on
the environment and submit reports to the Executive Director and the Lead Agency.

the Executive Director shall require that a wetland, riverbank or lakeshore which has been
degraded be allowed to regenerate or issue an environment restoration order.

4. Where an inspector has reasonable cause to believe that any person is violating the provisions
as stated in these regulations, he or she may issue against such a person an improvement notice
or take any measures as may deem appropriate.

5. Anyone who reclaims or drains a wetland: creels, constructs or demolishes any structure that
is fixed in or over a wetland; disturbs a wetland, deposits in or under a wetland a substance in a
manner likely to have an adverse effect on it; destroys or damages a wetland or fails or neglects
to protect a lake shore or a river bank from environmental degradation, commits an offence.

2.4 The National Environment (Waste Management Regulations),No.52 of 1999.

Section 15 of these regulations requires that a waste treatment plant or disposal site carry out an
EIA in accordance with these regulations before a licence is issued.
Sub section 2 of the same section, requires that an operator of a waste treatment plant or disposal
site carry out an annual audit of the environmental performance of the site /plant and submit a
report to NEMA.

Section 17 makes it mandatory for every person who operates a waste treatment plant / disposal
site to take all necessary steps to prevent pollution from the site or plant, which include among

9
others, instituting mitigation measures.

2.5 The Water Statute, No.9 of 1995.

This Statute does not expressly deal with EIA but has some provisions that are related to EIA.
These are contained in Division 4 of the statute and are laid out as follows:

Section 22 provides for the suspension or variation of a water permit by the Executive Director
where the water available in an area is or is likely to become insufficient in quality or quantity
for the needs of the people using or seeking to use it. This may be done by notice in writing to
the holder of the water permit for that area.

Where the holder of the permit:

i) fails to comply with the provisions of the statute;
ii) fails to make beneficial use of the permit within the preceding two years;
iii) uses water for purposes other than those for which the permit was issued or more water than
he is entitled to;
the Director may cancel such a permit (sec. 25).

2.6 The Wildlife Statute (No. 14, 1996).

Section 16 of this statute requires a developer desiring to undertake a project which may have a
significant impact on any wildlife species or community to carry out an EIA in accordance with
the National Environment Statute.

Section 17 of the same statute obliges the Uganda Wildlife Authority in consultation with
NEMA to carry out audits and monitor such projects that may have an impact on wildlife.

2.7 The Land Act, 1998.

The Land Act does not expressly deal with EIA but has some provisions that embrace it. It does
however, regulate the ownership of land and controls land use.

Section 44 obliges any person who owns or occupies land to manage and utilize it in accordance
with the Water statute, the National Environment Statute, the Forest Act and any other law.
Section 45 entrusts all natural resources to the Government to hold for the benefit of the people.
It also prohibits the Government or local authorities from leasing out or otherwise alienating
natural resources.

Section 46 of the Act requires that any use of land should conform with Town and Country
Planning Act and other laws. An EIA is therefore a useful tool to guarantee that the proposed
land use does not contravene any law.

10
2.8 The Investment Code, No. 18 of 1987.

This Code empowers the Uganda Investment Authority (UIA) to, among other things, attract and
coordinate all local and foreign investments in the country to enhance economic development.
Section 19 of the code requires every investment licence to take necessary steps to ensure that
the operation of its business enterprise does not cause any injury to the ecology or the
environment.

2.9 The Wetlands Policy, 1995.

This policy provides that all proposed modifications

and restorations on wetlands be subjected to EIA and
that damaged wetlands be rehabilitated in accordance
with the findings of the EIA.

It also requires that all planned new wetland

developments be subjected to EIA to determine the
environmental controls.

Those which have been subjected to EIA will

continually be monitored to assess their impact on the
environment where the impact is detrimental,
government will quire that such development be
halted.

3.0 The Environment Impact Assessment Regulations, No. 13 of 1998.

These regulations apply to;

i) all projects included in the Third Schedule to the statute

ii) any major repairs, extensions or routine maintenance of any existing project which is
included in the Third schedule to the statute.

11
 Chapter Three

3.1 PROJECT BRIEFS

a) Preparation of the project briefs

A developer is required to prepare a project brief stating the nature of the project, the projected
area of land, water and air that may be affected, the activities that shall be undertaken during and
after the development of the project, design of the project, the materials that the project will use
and to submit ten copies of the brief to the Executive Director.
If found complete, a copy of the project brief is transmitted to the Executive Director of the Lead
Agency for comments within seven days of receiving the project brief.
The Lead Agency comments and these are transmitted to the Executive Director within a period
of fourteen days from receiving the project brief (reg. 7).

b) Approval of the project

Where the project brief reveals significant impacts on the environment with no sufficient
mitigation measures to cope with the anticipated impacts, then the developer may be required to
carry out an environmental impact study.

After reviewing the project brief and where it discloses no significant impact on the environment
or where it reveals sufficient mitigation measures to cope with the anticipated impacts, the
project may be approved and a certificate of approval issued.
Where an environmental impact study is to be undertaken, the developer should be notified
within twenty one days from the date of submission of the project brief.

3.2. ENVIRONMENT IMPACT STUDIES AND STATEMENTS

This is covered under regulation 10 of the EIA regulations.

a) Terms of Reference (ToR) for Environmental Impact Assessment and other related matters.
An environmental impact study is conducted in accordance with the ToRs prepared by the
developer in consultation with the Lead Agencies and the Authority. The ToRs must include all
matters as provided for in regulation 14.
All Environmental Impact Statements are conducted in accordance with the guidelines adopted
by NEMA in consultation with the Lead agencies. For purposes of quality control, the Executive
Director approves the persons or firms who will undertake the studies (reg 11).

A code of conduct shall be established to regulate the conduct of those persons who will carry
out the studies.

b) Public Participation in preparing the study.

Modern environmental operations require the involvement of the public in all activities since the
environment is a public good. The public demands that all activities be in accordance with good
environmental practices.

12
Public involvement is critical in identifying a project's potential environmental impacts and
possible mitigation measures. As users of potentially affected resources, local people are quite
knowledgeable regarding their sustainable use. They often present evidence about potential
consequences of a project and can make suggestions to scientists or decision-makers on ways to
minimize the adverse impacts and how to capture potential benefits.

Public involvement gives those who will be affected by a project an opportunity to shape its
construction and operation, thereby ensuring a more harmonious long-term relationship between
the project and the surrounding community.
Involving the public may increase the time and resources required to perform and review an EIA.
Failure to involve the public in impact assessment can however result in increased costs to the
developers. Public participation should also be critical at the scoping process to ensure that
issues concerning the community are addressed in EIA.

While seeking the views of the people, the developer shall;

- publicise the intended project, its anticipated effects and benefits through the media in a
language that the affected communities understand
- hold meetings with the affected communities to explain the project and its effects in places
convenient to the affected people and agreed by the local leaders

c) Environment Impact Statement

An environment impact statement is a report made when an environmental impact study has been
conducted.
In making an environmental impact statement, the developer is required to pay attention to;
i) ecological considerations with emphasis on biological diversity, sustainable use,
ecosystem maintenance;
ii) social considerations with emphasis on immigration and emigration effects, social
disruption, effect of culture and objects of cultural value, and effects on human health
iii) Land use
iv) Landscape and such other issues as laid down in Annex 3 to these Guidelines and in the
First schedule to the EIA regulations.

In addition to the terms of reference, an environmental impact statement provides a description

of the project and the activities likely to be undertaken among other things laid down in
Regulation 14 and such matters as the Executive Director may deem necessary.

d) Contents of the Environment Impact Statement [ reg. 14]

In addition to the terms of reference, an environmental impact statement must provide the
following;
- a description of the project and of the activities it is likely to generate,
- the proposed site and reasons for rejecting the alternative sites,
- the material in-puts into the project and their potential environmental effects,
- the technology and processes that shall be used and a description of the alternative technologies
and processes and reasons for selecting them,
- an economic analysis of the project,
- the measures proposed for eliminating, minimizing or mitigating adverse impacts among other

13
things as shown in regulation 14 and such other matters as the Executive Director may deem
necessary.

3.3 THE REVIEW PROCESS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

a) Submission of the Environmental Impact Statement [reg.1]

The developer is required to submit twenty copies of the environmental impact statement to the
Executive Director.

b) Comments of the Lead Agency [reg. 18]

The Executive Director is required to transmit the EIS report to the Lead agency and requests
them to comment on it. The Lead Agency then makes comments on the EIS and transmits them
back to the Executive Director within thirty days of receiving the EIS.

In the case where the Lead Agency is the developer, it shall not be accepted to make
comments under sub-regulation (2). It shall instead be reql.1ired to submit an environmental
impact statement to the Executive Director who will make comments or invite other Lead
Agencies to make comments.

3.4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE ENVIRONMENT IMPACT

STATEMENT

The Executive Director shall within ten days of receiving the comments of the Lead Agency
invite the general public to submit written comments on the environmental impact statement if
found to be complete and satisfactory.
The invitation of the general public to make written comments shall be published in a Newspaper
having national and/or local circulation.
The notice must state the nature of the project, its location, and the anticipated negative and
positive impacts as well as the proposed mitigation measures to address the negative effects.

The Executive Director on receiving the comments of the Lead Agencies invites the comments
of those persons who are most likely to be affected by the proposed project.

3.5. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A public hearing is a public inquiry into the environmental impact statement.

A public hearing shall be called if the Lead Agency recognizes a need to hear opinions of the
public in concerned areas. It shall be held in consultation with the NEMA and the stakeholders in
the days mentioned in the notice. The Executive Director determines whether a public hearing
should be held or not after considering the comments from the environmental impact statement.
If there is controversy or where the project to be discussed has Trans-boundary effects, a public
hearing shall be called. The public is then notified of a public hearing in the following ways;
- through a letter posted in or near the affected community
- in a publication in a daily news paper in a local language understood by the
affected community
- or published in an official language or through any other suitable media.
The notice shall contain full information about the location, time of proposed meeting and items

14
 to be discussed in the meeting.
Public hearings can be held at the project site, social centre, meeting place within Lead Agency
quarters, or any other convenient place identified for this purpose.

3.5.1 Purpose of the public hearings

The objective of holding the hearings is to enable the Executive Director make a fair and just
decision in either approving or otherwise dealing with the environmental impact study.
This involves two types of decision making and processes;
 Where the Executive Director has considered the EIS and all the comments received, he may
make a decision either to approve or not to approve it without a public hearing or hold a
public hearing. Or where the Executive Director considers it necessary for the protection of
the environment and the promotion of good governance.
Or
 Where there is controversy or where the project may have Trans-boundary impact, a public
hearing must be held.

The presiding officer over the public hearing makes a report at the end of the public hearing of
the views that were presented by the public to the Lead Agency within a period of thirty days
from the day on which the hearing was concluded.
The Lead Agency then makes a report to the Executive Director containing the findings and
recommendations from the public hearing within twenty one days from the public hearing.

3.6. DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ON THE ENVIRONMENT

IMPACT STATEMENTS.

a) Basis of Decision
In making a decision regarding an EIA, the following have to be taken into account;
i) the validity of the predictions made in the environmental impact statement.
ii) the comments made by the public
iii) the report of the presiding officer
iv) an analysis of the economic and the social / cultural impacts of the project and
v) other factors which the Executive Director may consider crucial to the project.

Failure to take any of the above may lead to a cause of action on appeal or review.

b) Decision of the Executive Director

The Executive Director may;

 approve the project or part thereof
 require that the project be redesigned including directing that different technology or an
alternative site be chosen
 refer back the project or part thereof to the developer where there is insufficient information
for further study or submission of additional information as may be required to make the
Executive Director make a decision or
 reject the project

15
 c) Conditions of approval of a project
In making his decision to approve the project, the Executive Director shall;
i) give approval subject to such conditions as it deems necessary
ii) state a period for which the approval shall remain valid
iii) issue a certificate of approval of the project in the form contained in Second schedule to
Regulations.

It is important to note that the conditions of approval are legally binding on the developer and
can be used to take any necessary legal action against the developer.

d) Rejection of the project

If the Executive Director makes a decision to reject a project, he shall state in writing, the
reasons for which the project was rejected.

e) Cancellation of the approval for the environmental impact assessment

In order to safeguard against unscrupulous developers, the Executive Director may at any time
after the issuance of the certificate of approval of the project revoke the approval where:
i) there is non-compliance with the conditions set out in the certificate;
ii) there is substantial modification of the project implementation or operation which may
lead to adverse environmental impacts
iii) there is a substantive undesirable effect not contemplated in the approval

3.7 Other provisions

a) Offences

In order that these EIA requirements are enforced, penalties were set up to deal with those
developers who wouldn't comply with the requirements of the law.
Section 36 of these regulations provides that any person wko carries out a project without
approval from NEMA commits an offence contrary to S. 97 of the NES and is liable on
conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 18 months or a fine of not less than
180,000/= and not more than 18,000,000= or both.

b) Fees
Depending on the size of the project and the circumstances of each particular case, the authority
shall charge a fee on the developer for the following;
Project briefs and EIAs
access to records under subsection (1) of Section 86 any other amount that is necessary

Fees payable for project briefs and environmental impact assessment under regulation 37(1) are
as follows:

1. Where the total value of the project does not exceed Shs. 50,000,000/=, the amount payable shall
be Shs. 250,000=;

16
2. Where the total value of the project exceeds Shs. 50,000,000= but does note exceed
hs.l00,000,000=, amount payable shall be Shs. 500,000=;

3. Where the total value of the project is more than Shs.l00,000,000= but does not exceed
Shs.250,000,000= the amount payable shall be Shs.750,000=;

4. Where the total value of the project is more than Shs. 250,000,000= but does not exceed Shs.
500,000,000= the amount payable shall be Shs.1,000,000=.

5. Where the total value of the project is more than Shs.500,000,000= but does exceed
1,000,000,000= the amount payable shall be Shs.l,250,000=;

6. Where the total value of the project is more than Shs.1,000,000,000= but does not exceed
5,000,000,000=, the amount payable shall be Shs.2,000,000=;

7. Where the total value of the project is more than Shs.5,000,000,000= the amount payable shall be
0.1 % of the total value of the project.

( Note: Exchange rate at the date of publication; 1 US D is equivalent to 1,745 Uganda Shs.)

17
 Chapter Four

4.0 THE EIA PROCESS: PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED IN CARRYING OUT

AN EIA.

The main EIA process is made up of three phases namely;

4.1 Phase I ; Preliminary activities/ Screening process

EIA law usually requires that all projects which are listed in Annex 2 of these guidelines,
undergo a preliminary assessment to determine whether a full EIA is required. However, not all
development projects will necessarily cause adverse effects to the environment, and hence not all
proposed projects that require EIA may undergo the entire EIA process or the same level of
assessment.

The objective of the screening phase is to determine if a proposed project;

1 has or does not have significant impact. If it is found to have no potential of causing
adverse effects to the environment, it shall be excluded from further EIA and an
appropriate decision shall be made to either approve or implement the project.
2 has adverse environmental impacts for which mitigation measures can readily be
identified either directly or through an environmental impact review. If found that
adequate mitigation measures have been incorporated for the identified impact, the
environmental aspects of the project may then be approved.
3 has significant impact whose mitigation measures can not readily be identified hence
requiring a detailed EIS.

The developer gives a description of the project he intends to undertake and its impacts in the
preliminary report. The report is submitted to the National Environment Management Authority,
a Statutory body which is mandated by law to approve a project where upon it is decided
whether a full EIA should be undertaken or not.

4.2 Phase II ; Environment Impact Study(EIS)

This stage deals with the identification of possible impacts

a) Scoping
This exercise should as much as possible involve consultation with the potentially affected
communities as well as Non-Governmental Organisations, the private sector and other interested
parties. Meetings should be arranged to obtain their comments on what to include in the study
and what alternatives to be considered.

The team under the guidance of the coordinator identifies all the possible environmental impacts
of the proposed project. The team in conjunction with the authority determines the scope of the
study based on the magnitude of the project, extent of the impact, significant impacts which

18
include specific local economic, social and ecological setting.

b) Baseline Study
This involves undertaking a detailed description of the existing environment including the social
and economic activities of the local population resident in the area to be affected.

c) Impact Evaluation

The various impacts that the project may have on the environment are evaluated by the team and
ranked according to two criteria;
i) quantitative or measurable change, where the impact can be measured and
ii) qualitative change where the impact cannot be measured but depends on the
environmental acceptability of the project.

Quantitative changes provide a numerical representation of a measure and include the following;
 Water quality and hydrology: whether the proposed project will contaminate a public water
supply, alter the course or flow of flood water, or deplete ground water supply;
 population and housing: whether the proposed project will displace large numbers of people,
induce substantial growth or concentration of people
 geology; whether the proposed project will expose structures and human to major hazards
such as earth quakes, landslides or result in changes in deposition of soils;
 Biological resources: whether it will eliminate plant and animal communities, cause fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels;
 Air quality: whether the intended project will result in substantial air emissions or decrease in
ambient air quality.

Qualitative changes on the other hand refer to measures that are more descriptive and represent
the presence of something reported and not necessarily measurable. These changes would
subsequently lead to the degradation of the visual quality and sense of beauty of the natural
environment. This considers such issues as, whether:
 the proposed project will significantly alter the existing natural view sheds including changes
in natural terrain;
 it will greatly reduce sunlight or introduce shadows in areas used extensively by the
communities;
 it will comply with local guidelines or goals related to visual quality;
 it will significantly increase light and glare on the project vicinity.

d) Identification of Mitigation Measures

The EIA process seeks to compare various alternative options that may be available for any
project and hence determine which one represents the most desirable balance between
environmental and economic costs and benefits. Analysis and discussion of a range of
altematives to the proposed project should include an evaluation of the merits of each alternative
with respect to:
 technology and engineering design;

19
 associated environmental costs of each alternative; interference and harmony with the
surrounding features;
 conformity to the existing laws;
 constraints and benefits of each alternative;
 nature of the alternative/ locations of project.

During such analyses, environmental losses and gains associated with the various alternatives are
compared together with economic costs and benefits to provide a balanced and full picture of
each alternative.
The team then identifies measures for the elimination (where possible), reduction of the
potential impact, repairing damage or compensation for the various altematives identified in the
study and enhancing positive environmental benefits. The cost of the mitigation measures is also
included in the evaluation.

4.3 Phase III; Decision-making

On the basis of whether the proposed project is exempt or appropriate mitigation measures have
been incorporated for the identified impacts, a decision shall be made to either approve or
disapprove the environmental aspects of the proposed project. If approved, the necessary action
shall be undertaken by the developer. After reaching a decision on the proposed action, and if it
is approved, the developer will be permitted to implement the project in accordance with the
mitigation terms or conditions attached to the approval. In the decision given by the developer,
he shall give one alternative and cite reasons for rejecting others. The alternatives rejected and
their reasons for being rejected should also be included in the report.

When approving an EIA, the Lead Agency can give a directive to the developer before, during
and after realization of the project with a view to remedying any adverse effects of the project
and ascertaining what impact the project may have in the event of decommissioning.

4.4 Post Assessment Environmental Audits

Monitoring of projects after EIA has been conducted is essential as this will ensure that the
mitigation measures and any other conditionalities set out by the developer in the EIA are
complied with and also verifies the performance of existing plans in the face of new laws and

20
standards. The developer is required to ensure that all practicable measures to minimise any
predictions as laid out in the project brief or EIS are complied with.

Environmental Audit means the systemic, documented periodic and objective evaluation of how
well an environmental organisation, management and equipment are performing in conserving
the environment and its resources.

Environmental Audits are therefore a monitoring mechanism, the responsibility of carrying out
an environmental audit lies with NEMA and the Lead Agencies. After completion of the project
or before the commencement of its activities, the developer is required to undertake an initial
environmental audit of the project. It is required of the developer to prepare an environmental
audit report after each audit and to have it submitted to the Executive Director.

a) Audit of the Authority

An inspector shall be designated to carry out an audit of any land, project or facility for which a
project brief or EIS has been made to determine how far the predictions made in the project brief
or EIS are complied with.

b) Mitigation Measures
A mitigation measure is that which a developer may carry out to reduce or minimize the
impact to the environment that the proposed project may cause or may have caused. .
The purpose of this is to look for alternative and better ways of implementing the proposed
project or associated activities so that the negative impacts are substantially eliminated or
minimised while the benefits are enhanced.

A mitigation or management plan should include the following items;

 Identification and summary of all anticipated adverse' environmental impacts
 Description of each mitigation measures, including the type of impact to which it relates and
the conditions under which it is required, together with designs, equipment descriptions and
operating procedures
 Description of the elements of the monitoring programme
 Monitoring and reporting procedures that are designed to ensure early detection of conditions
that necessitates corrective actions and provide information on the progress and results of
mitigation and institutional strengthening measures.

c) Improvement Notices

Where a developer fails to put in place mitigation measures as set out in his EIS, he will be
issued with an improvement notice by an environmental inspector and or commence criminal or
civil proceedings against him as laid out in the NES.

21
ANNEX 1

PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE EIA

1. Urban development:
 establishments of industrial estates
 shopping centres/malls
 expansion of recreational townships in areas like national parks or protected areas

2. Transportation:
 all major roads
 all roads in scenic, wooded areas
 railway lines
 airports / fields
 water transport, pipelines

3. Aerial spraying

4. Mining:
-quarrying and open cast extraction of precious metals, metalliferous ores, limestone etc.

5. Dams, rivers and water storage sources:

 storage dams
 river diversions and water transport catchment areas
 drilling for purposes of utilising ground water resources

6. Forestry activities:
 timber harvesting
 use of pesticides and fertilizers
 introduction of new crops

7. Processing and manufacturing products:

 mineral processing
 foundries
 glass works
 oil refineries
 tanning and dressing of hides and skins
 food processing
 brewing and malting

8. Electrical infrastructure:
Generation stations, Transmission lines, electrical substations, manufacturing storage schemes

9. Waste disposal:
 sites for disposal
 sewage disposal

22
  works offensive odours
 atmospheric emissions

10. Natural conservation areas:

 creation of buffer zones, national parks
 establishment of wilderness areas
 introduction of alien species of fauna and flora
 policies for management of ecosystems

ANNEX 2

PROJECTS LIKELY TO BE EXEMPTED FROM EIA

1. Clearing and Farm construction for subsistence use

2. Construction or repair of individual houses
3. Small/ minor land use changes in slopping areas
4. Information collection/ scientific and education , Environmental enforcement actions
5. Emergency repairs to facilities

ANNEX 3

ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED IN MAKING AN EIA

1. Ecological Considerations;
a) Biological diversity including:
i) effect of proposal on number, diversity, breeding habits etc. of wild animals and
vegetation.
ii) Gene pool of domesticated plants and animals e.g. monoculture as opposed to wild types.
b) Sustainable use including:
i) effect of proposal on soil fertility.
ii) breeding populations of fish and game or wild animals.
iii) natural regeneration of woodland and sustainable yield.
iv) wetland resource degradation or wise use of wetlands.

c) Ecosystem maintenance including:

i) Effect of proposal on food chains.
ii) Nutrient cycles,
iii) Aquifer recharge. water run-off rates etc..
iv) Arial extent of habitats.
v) Fragile ecosystems.

2. Social considerations including:

i) effects of proposal on generation or reduction of employment in the area,
ii) social cohesion or disruption,
iii) effect on human health,

23
iv) immigration or emigration,
v) Communication- roads opened up, re-routed.
vi) Local economy.

3.

24