1
MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION
(Filed under Section.482 of Cr.P.C}
On the file of the Hon'ble VII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate,
Hyderabad
C.C. NO. 199 OF 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
CRL. [Link]. OF 2019
Between:
Rishabh Jain Sio Ramesh B Jain
Aged about 38yrsOcc: Business
R/o 4th Floor, Eros Theatre Building, [Link] Road
Mumbai - 400 020 ..PETITIONER
ACCUSED 1
VERSUS
[Link] State of Telangana
Represented by the Public Prosecutor
High Court of Telangana
Through SHO,Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad
[Link] Nay Mohanty S/o late DebendranathMohanty
Aged 55 yrs, Addl. General Manager (Purchase)
MIDHANI, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad
R/o Flat No.403 Prashant Residency
Vinay Nagar Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS
COMPLAINANT
PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE, 1973 SEEKING QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE LEARNED VII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE AT HYDERABAD, IN [Link]. 199 of 2017 ARISING OUT
OF FIR NO. 54 OF 2017 AND ALL OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL
PROCEEDINGS THERETO, REGISTERED AND INITIATED AGAINST
THE PETITIONER BY THE POLICE STATION, KANCHANBAGH
(HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "FIR"), ON THE DIRECTIONS OF
THE COURT OF VII ACMM, HYDERABADCOURT.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. The address for service of all notices, summons of the above
mentioned Petitioner is that of its Counsel, C. TULASI KRISHNA
2
(10738), Apartment No.3, Sri . Nilayam, [Link]. 3-6-369/A/10, Street
No.1, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 [Link] instant Memorandum
of Grounds of Criminal Petition is been filed UnderSection 482 of Cr.P.
C seeking quashing of charge sheet in [Link].199 of 2017 on the file
of the court of the Hon'ble VII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate,
Hyderabad.
2. The Hon'ble Court of VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad,
has taken on file the above [Link]. 199 of 2017 for offences under
Section 406, 420 r/w Section 34 of IPC.
The petitioner is arrayed as accused No.1.
Brief facts of the case:
1. It is submitted that the 2nd respondent approached the Station
1
House Officer, PS Kanchanbagh on 20.02.2015 and filed an FIR under
Section 406, 420, 468, 471 r/w Sec 34 of IPC against the petitioner
and others. The said FIR No.54 of 2015 was registered on 23.02.2015
by the 2nd respondent herein who was then working as Additional
General Manager (Purchase) in Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited
(MIDHANI) which is a GovernMent of India enterprise.
2. It is submitted that MIDHANI called for a Global Tender for
supply of 1500 Kgs Ferro Tungsten Alloy with an intent to import the
same and M/s Speciality Chemicals UK Limited was adjudged as the
lowest bidder and a Purchase Order was raised on 28.07.2014 on the
said Company by MIDHANI. However, per the terms of the amended
Purchase Order the material was to be sourced from China for
r
.
MIDHANI by way of an amendment dated 04 09.2014, as MIDHANI
had approved the source of material as China by way of email Dated
06.09.2014..
3. It is submitted that the petitioner herein is a business Director
of Mis Speciality Chemicals UK Limited and in due course of its
business had nominated M/s Rishabh Metals & Chemicals Pvt Limited
(an associate concern) for coordination and providing assistance to the
customer MIDHANI. MIDHANI had advised M/s Speciality Chemicals
UK Ltd to dispatch Ferro Tungsten manufactured/ supplied by M/S
Changsha Kangmei (supplier). M/s. Speciality Chemicals UK Ltd
advised the supplier to supply/ dispatch the Ferro tungsten directly to
1CD, Hyderabad, as 'per7the instructions of MIDHANI and accordingly
the goods were dispatched from Xingang Port, China to 1CD,
Hyderabad on 23.10.2014.
4. It is submitted that M/s Speciality Chemicals UK Limited in the
due course of its business made a market query in regard to the
availability and required quality of Ferro Tungsten Alloy for volume of
1500 Kgs for the purpose of procurement for Midhani. The said
market query was responded by M/s. Changsha Kangmei Mining Co.
Ltd. of China who used to supply the said material. It is submitted
that usually whenever chemicals are purchased on the International
Market, a quality specifications from an International Certifying
agency (specialised 3rd party) is the generally accepted norm to assure
maintenance of quality standards. In this case, the International
reputed and accepted agency by name M/s. SGS Ltd. was nominated
to certify the identity and quality of the material. The said services of
quality were duly issued by the agency -SGS [Link] was procured
4
from Mfs Changsha Kangmei Mining Co. Ltd., China. The said
material was procured through a Company which is an associate
company of M/s Rishabh Metals & Chemicals Pvt Limited at Mumbai
i.e. M/s Siddharth Carbochem Products Ltd, which was then
nominated to carry out the said transaction as it had spare banking
Letter of Credit facilities available. It is further submitted that under a
High Seas Sale Agreement M/s Speciality Chemicals UK Limited
purchased the said material fi . .om M/s Siddharth Carbochem Products
Ltd. The said arrangement and the procedure being followed by M/s
Speciality Chemicals UK Limited through M/s Siddharth Carbochem
Products Ltd was duly explained to the officials of MIDHANI and were
agreed upon by the parties. It is further submitted that the officials of
MIDHANI were aware that M/s Siddharth Carbochem Products Ltd
was a closely held company for the purpose of better control and
competitive transaction and that the same was intimated to the
officials of MIDHANI.
5. It is submitted that the SGS certification, certifying the
authenticity of the material in the consignment confirming it to be
Ferro Tungsten Alloy was duly received by the Bank of India from the
Chinese Supplier Changsha Kangmei. The Bank of India, then upon
receipt of the payment from Siddharth Carbochem Products Ltd
stamped the said SGS certificate and handed over the same to
Siddharth Carbochem Products Ltd. This document was then
forwarded to M/s Speciality Chemicals UK Limited and was forwarded
to the officials of MIDHANI. It is submitted that the transaction of
procurement of the material was solely based upon certificate of
quality assurance that were issued by SGS China, which is a. reliable
and internationally accepted quality control and assurance agency.
5
6. It is respectfully submitted that the shipment was dispatched
from China and arrived in India and was delivered directly to ICD at
Hyderabad by the shipping Line. Neither of the companies Rishabh
Metals and Chemicals Pvt Ltd, Siddharth Carbochem Products Ltd nor
Specialty Chemicals UK Ltd ever handled the product or saw the
product. The material was to be delivered sealed and packed directly
from the supplier (Changsha Kengmei China) to the Customer
(MIDHANI) at ICD Hyderabad. The officials of MIDHANI arrived to take
possession of the shipment and sought to take samples to ascertain
the identity and quality of the material. At this stage the seal of the
material was found broken and the bags appeared to be tampered
with. The representative of Rishabh Metals & Chemicals Pvt Ltd then
requested for photographs of the material and asked MIDHANI not to
take delivery of the material. The photographs of the material were
emailed to Changsha Kengmei, China who replied that the goods do
not seem to be the same which were shipped by them. Upon analysis
of the said sample it was found that the material in the consignment
was not Ferro Tungsten Alloy and was actually Limestone. The
petitioner herein was shocked and surprised to learn that despite
having an international certificate by a reputed agency, the
consignment turned down to be a fake and forged one. The Chinese
supplier suggested theft or tampering in transit. The representative of
Rishabh Metals and Chemicals Pvt Ltd then advised MIDHANI not to
clear the material. It was informed to the MIDHANI that Specialty
Chemicals UK Ltd are a procurement company who had placed an
order from the open market and made payment to the supplier basing
upon the validity of an International approved agency and that they