20240930-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To - Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees On Environment and Communications-SUBMISSION-Supplement 2
Uploaded by
Gerrit Hendrik Schorel-Hlavka20240930-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To - Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees On Environment and Communications-SUBMISSION-Supplement 2
Uploaded by
Gerrit Hendrik Schorel-HlavkaPage 1
1
2
3 Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications 30-9-2024-No 2
4 Email PO Box 6100
5 Parliament House
6 Canberra ACT 2600
7 [email protected]
8 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
9 Re -SUBMISSION-Supplement 2
10 Sir/Madam,
11 In addition to my earlier writings I at this late hour came across a vide which I view
12 albeit referring to the USA is also to be considered in regard of the Commonwealth of Australia.
13
14
15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYV0RjaVuhg
16 'We Cannot Let This Go': House Republicans Rail Against The UN ...
17 17 Sept 2024 ... 'We Cannot Let This Go': House Republicans Rail Against The UN And World
18 Health Organization. 2.1M views · 12 days ago ...more. Forbes ...
19
20 I just checked the link and it does download.
21
22 The video refers not only to the USA but about the power grab by the U.N. and WHO to serve
23 China. Also, how they seek to implement countries to silence those who may make contrary
24 statement to what they desire.
25 I understand that we also have judges in the High Court of Australia who I view by their conduct
26 have been or are TRAITORS to our constitution, as also many politicians are.
27 It should be understood that the “covid scam” of recent years eventuated long after I already
28 commenced to expose the TREASONOUS conduct by many politicians and their collaborators.
29 As a matter of fact in the AEC v Schorel-Hlavka litigation I then clearly stated that the
30 Commonwealth has no legislative powers to alter the nationality of any person born in the
31 commonwealth of Australia and that “Australian citizenship is not a nationality but a indication
32 of place of abode. I specifically challenge the High Court of Australia jurisdiction powers of Sue
33 v Hill as to claim that Australians are “Australian citizens” by nationality as Australians are and
34 remain to be “subject of the British Crown”. Anyone ought to understand that if the judges in
35 Sue v Hill even a bit had to be correct, while they were then clearly “subjects to the British
36 Crown” to allegedly be “Australian citizens” as a nationality then their judgments were ULTRA
37 VIRES.
38
39 As I stated in the past this legal principle also apply likewise to the Commonwealth of Australia:
40
41 Scheuer v Thodes, 416 US 232 94S Ct 1683, 1687 (1974) states:
42 “when a state officer (which includes Judges) acts under a state law in a manner violative
43 of the US Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
44 Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is
30-9-2024-No 2 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct.
2 The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme
3 authority of the United States”.
4
5 This means that any judge who betrays the constitution simply cannot sit as a judge and therefore
6 cannot hear any litigation either!
7
8 I am well aware that there is a claim about the States having within Ss51(xxxviii) provided
9 powers to the Commonwealth to essential take over the powers of the UK Parliament, but that is
10 grossly misunderstood. As French J (Later French CJ) made clear that Ss51(xxvii) regarding
11 reference of powers of the states to the commonwealth must be found elsewhere as Ss51(xxxvii)
12 does no more but to give the Commonwealth powers to accept a reference of power but it
13 doesn’t provide the states to do so. As such, the States can only have such powers provided the
14 states have a successful State referendum to allow the State constitution to be amended to refer
15 certain original jurisdiction powers from the Supreme Court of Victoria to the Commonwealth,
16 this as any referral of legislative powers include a change of jurisdiction powers ordinary being
17 the original judicial powers of the state Supreme Court and due to the “separation of powers” the
18 state parliament lacks such powers and the State executive cannot do so without consent of the
19 State electors either. Moreover, as I wrote extensively about it appears to me that the State of
20 Victoria didn’t even publish the first State Constitution being the amended old Victoria Colonial
21 Constitution Act 1855 and as such it never even had legislative powers nor could provide for
22 political elections. Any purported amendment and or substitution such as the purported Victorian
23 Constitution Act 1975 is ULTRA VIRES and as such there was no valid State government or
24 even a valid State parliament and as such neither any validly purported reference of legislative
25 powers either. That just sinks the boat of Ss51(xxxvii) and 51(xxxviii).
26 Indeed, very silly if not stupid the State purported government and others as all 9 Attorney-
27 Generals were served with my submissions and also NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL
28 MATTER that was in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka before the court on 19 July 2006 opposed any part
29 of what I had placed before the Court in my successful appeals and therefore conceded that
30 Australians are and remain to be “Subjects of the British crown”.
31 Just in case it be argued that there is the purported Australian Act 1986 (UK) and (Cth) this
32 would be a problem as the British Parliament effectively (well purportedly) denied any future
33 British parliament to legislate in regard of the Commonwealth of Australia and hence cannot
34 then legislate for an Amended Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and so
35 cannot alter the first 8 Clauses of this Act and the purported Australia Act being within
36 Ss51(xxxviii) cannot therefore interfere with the first 8 Clauses.
37 I have been working on this project for decades and as such view that those in power and their
38 collaborators were simply suckers to not first sort out the legal basis despite my ongoing writing
39 to expose it
40 There is not a single judge who can hear and determine any case against me because if the judge
41 claims to be a “Australian citizen” by nationality then he effective claims to be some foreign
42 national and would violate the constitution. If the judge claims to be a “subject of the British
43 Crown” then by Sue v Hill he would be a foreign national and so again the same problem.
44 In a chess game this may refer to this as check mate. Does this mean the end of the rule of law?
45 Absolutely not this because every maintains to have human, natural and common law rights.
46 When you got a purported Attorney-General who appears to me to be BRAIN DEAD not
47 understanding that to give authorization to the U.N. and/or WHO and/or W.E.F. is essentially
48 TREASON as it defies our constitutional system then surely it is well overdue that in future any
49 person wanting to become a Member of Parliament (law maker) then should be competent in
50 explaining constitutional issues. It means that Statute law is no more in certain circumstances.
51 And those who desire to become a Minister for sure should know the constitution extensively as
30-9-2024-No 2 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 3
1 to the legal principles embedded in the constitution. No more taxpayers having to fork out
2 compensation payments because some BRAIN DEAD Minister stuffed up big time blatantly
3 disregarding the constitutional rights of Australians.
4
5 I have actually challenged many politicians for a TV debate but none ever accepted this because
6 they are well aware t-hey would make utter fools of themselves.
7
8 Where the Commonwealth DPP and 9 Attorney-Generals couldn’t even manage to defeat me on
9 a single constitutional issue while I was representing myself surely may underline, they would
10 have done better instead of litigating and not being arrogant to have had direct communication
11 and meetings with me to seek to address matters appropriately.
12 But their arrogance was taken as first priority.
13
14 Now we have them in pickles in that various Ministers have been involved as I view it with
15 committing TREASON and therefore no longer have a seat in the Parliament but are now
16 imposters.
17
18 We cannot overthrow an unconstitutional government because it has no constitutional legitimacy
19 in the first place.
20 This whole mis/disinformation pursued legislation cannot even be valid if it doesn’t apply to all
21 persons, including politicians and their officials, and as such it is back to the drawing board if
22 you really do not desire to hold finally Members of Parliament and Ministers and their officials
23 legally accountable for any mis/disinformation and be able to stand trail for this?
24 Any mis/disinformation Act (if enacted) would be fatal to Ministers and their officials also as the
25 constitution doesn’t allow them to be excluded from legal accountability. The only person who is
26 excluded from legal accountability is a Governor-General (in the States a Governor) as such a
27 person is deemed to represent the Monarch and it are the Ministers who then has to cop the legal
28 accountability unless the Governor-General (Governor in the states) commit offences outside
29 his/her prerogative powers.
30
31 Let the rule of law prevail!
32
33 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
34
35 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
36 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
37 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®
38 (Our name is our motto!)
30-9-2024-No 2 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
