Aster DM Healthcare LTD - Initiating Coverage
Aster DM Healthcare LTD - Initiating Coverage
COVERAGE REPORT
Aster DM Healthcare Ltd
20 September 2024
Akshaya Shinde
Pharma & Healthcare
9664200928 / 022 42005518
[email protected]
Awanish Chandra
Executive Director
8693822293 / 022 4200 5508
[email protected]
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH
Aster DM Healthcare is a leading private multi-speciality tertiary care hospital chain in South
India, with 19 hospitals, 13 clinics, 217 pharmacies, and 243 labs and PEC’s across five southern Rating: Accumulate Return: 9%
states. It is one of the emerging hospital chains in India. Established in 1987, Aster DM started Current Price: 418 Target Price: 457
with a single clinic and expanded to multiple clinics, hospitals, labs, and pharmacies across
several Gulf countries, before launching its India operations in 2021. In April 2024, the company |Market data
separated its India and GCC businesses to focus on India and unlock value. Currently, Aster DM
Bloomberg: ASTERDM:IN
has 4,867 beds and plans to double capacity to 10,000 beds within five to six years. We like Aster
52-week H/L (Rs): 558/309
DM due to 1) addition of 1,677 beds by FY27, 2) 57% of the capex to be brownfield, 3) expanding
therapies like oncology for a better case mix, and 4) cost optimization efforts to boost EBITDA Mcap (Rs bn/USD bn): 209 /2.5
margins. Expansions in existing markets also reduce execution risks. Going ahead, due to Shares outstanding (mn): 500
capacity expansion, the revenue will increase significantly. We forecast EBITDA CAGR of 26% over Free float: 45.%
FY24-FY27E. We assign 22x EV/EBITDA on Sept’26E EBITDA and arrive at a target price of Rs 457 Daily vol. (3M Avg.): 3.0 Mn
per share, translating into an upside of 9% and hence, we assign Accumulate rating on the stock. Face Value (Rs): 10.0
Source: Bloomberg, SMIFS Research
Second largest player in South India and largest in Kerala- Aster DM, the second-largest hospital chain
in South India boasts 4,867 beds, just behind Apollo Hospitals' 5,255 beds. The southern states—Tamil |Shareholding pattern (%)
Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Telangana, and Karnataka—boast a high per capita income of over Rs. Jun-24 Mar-24 Dec-23 Sep-23
150,000, compared to the national average of Rs. 94,000. Despite a high bed density of 3.5 hospital
Promoter 41.9 41.9 41.9 41.9
beds per 1,000 people, these states offer great opportunities due to their large elderly population of
FIIs 27.1 33.5 41.0 40.2
4 Cr, driving the demand for robust healthcare services, where Aster DM plays a key role.
DIIs 16.3 13.7 7.2 7.6
Expansion of beds by 34% in FY27: The company plans to add beds capacity of 1677 beds over a span Public/others 14.4 10.6 9.6 9.8
of 3 years which will increase the number of beds by 34% from 4,867 beds in FY24 to 6,544 beds in
FY27E with total capex spend of Rs. 11 Bn. Aster DM will be adding 959 beds through brownfield |Pro. Pledging
expansion across its hospitals in Kerala, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh hospitals with capex of Rs Pledging 98.8 98.8 98.8 98.8
4.8n over FY24-27E. Further company is looking to add additional 718 beds through greenfield in Source: BSE
Kasaragod and Trivandrum (Kerala) with expected capex spend of Rs. 5.7 Bn. Since, Aster already has
strong presence in all three regions it won’t be difficult for them to attract patients due to strong |Price performance (%)*
regional connect. This will help to boost revenue growth going forward. The capex will largely be 1M 3M 12M 36M
funded by internal accruals as the company has healthy cash flows. Despite large capex cycle, the NIFTY 50 3.4 8.0 26.2 M
44.5
returns ratios are expected to improve for the company with ROE and ROCE of 12% and 13% NIFTY 500 3.0 7.3 35.4 58.7
respectively in FY27E.
ASTERDM 6.6 17.9 23.6 92.8
*as on 19th Sep 2024; Source: AceEquity, SMIFS Research
Value unlocking due to demerger of GCC business: In Nov 2023, Aster DM announced the complete
sale of its GCC business for USD 1.0 Bn (USD 1.7 Bn EV; approx. 14.7x FY24 EV/EBITDA) to Alpha GCC |Price Performance Chart
Holdings, which is owned by a consortium led by Fajr (65%) and Aster promoters (35%). Aster received 450
USD 907.6 Mn in Q4FY24, with the balance to be paid upon certain contingent events. The received 400
funds have been utilized for dividend payouts and partially for expansion. Each business now has its 350
dedicated management team; Ms. Alisha Moopen has been promoted to MD and Group CEO of the
300
GCC business, while Dr. Azad Moopen will oversee both operations. The segregation of the GCC
250
business has unlocked value for the India business, making it easier for investors to understand and
evaluate its performance in the market. 200
150
EBITDA margins to improve going forward: The EBITDA margins of the company is expected to improve 100
by 364 bps over the next three years. Some hospitals in Kerala clusters (60% EBITDA contribution) Apr-22 Nov-22 Jun-23 Jan-24 Aug-24
such as Aster Medicity, Aster CMI and Aster Calicut has 30%+ margins whereas the Karnataka and Source: NSE
Andhra cluster have margins of 23% and 11% respectively with scope to improve the margins further.
Margins will expand due to 1) 65% of the beds expansion is justifiably in Kerala which has highest
margins as occupancies there have surpassed 80% 2) Enhanced performance in Andhra-Telangana
region will contribute significantly to overall growth, and early signs are visible (Ramesh hospital
margin has improved to 10% in FY24 from 9% FY23 3) Aster Pharmacy is expected to witness margin
improvements in FY26, albeit gradually. Akshaya Shinde
Sector Lead – Pharma & Healthcare
Valuation is in comfort zone: Currently, the stock is trading at comforting valuation on Sept’26 9664200928/022 42005518
EV/EBITDA of 19.3x. We like Aster as 1) major expansion is brownfield where growth could be [email protected]
Beat estimates
achieved without dilutingon
theall counts;
margins 2) O&Mmaintain Accumulate
hospital additions will add incremental revenue; (3) Awanish Chandra
Aster Labs is EBITDA positive from Q4 FY24; and (4) strong ARPOB growth. We value the stock at 22x Executive Director
on Sept’26 EV/EBITDA (in line with KIMS) and arrive at target price of Rs. 457 per share which offers 8693822293
upside of 9% from current valuations. Therefore, we assign Accumulate rating on the stock. [email protected]
Y/E Mar (Rs mn) Revenue YoY (%) EBITDA EBITDA (%) Adj PAT YoY (%) Adj EPS RoE (%) RoCE (%) Adj P/E (x) EV/EBITDA (x)
FY23 29,941 25.6 4,491 15.0 1,090 60.3 2.8 5.9 8.2 100.0 26.6
FY24 36,989 23.5 5,780 15.6 1,224 12.3 3.6 6.1 8.9 140.6 32.0
FY25E 43,225 16.9 7,384 17.1 2,467 101.6 4.9 6.4 8.2 84.6 27.8
FY26E 51,270 18.6 9,286 18.1 4,059 64.5 8.1 9.6 10.6 51.4 21.7
Update
FY27E 60,626 25.8 11,680 19.3 SMIFS
5,824 Limited
43.5 11.7 12.1 12.6 35.8 17.0 1
Source: Company, SMIFS Research Estimates *ROCE is calculated on post tax profit
esult Update SMIFS Limited 1
SMIFS Research is also available on Bloomberg
Initiating Coverage 1
Index
Index ................................................................................................................ 2
Mapping India’s Hospital Bed Capacity .............................................................. 3
Investment Rationale ....................................................................................... 4
One of the largest players in South India ........................................................................... 4
How Aster DM stands out from its peers? ......................................................................... 4
Expansion of beds by 34% in next three years to drive growth ......................................... 5
Dominance in Domestic Market with Limited Peer Competition ....................................... 6
What makes Kerala a popular medical tourism destination? ............................................ 6
Strong brand equity in GCC but lower international patients mix in India why so? .......... 7
Value unlocked due to demerger of GCC business ............................................................ 8
Higher ARPOB than peers in Tier II and III cities ................................................................. 9
ARPOB to grow at CAGR of 8% over FY24-FY27 ............................................................... 10
Revenue will increase due to new beds addition ............................................................. 12
EBITDA to grow at CAGR of 26% from FY24-27E .............................................................. 12
Why the EBITDA margins are lower than peers? ............................................................. 13
Strong cash generation going ahead ................................................................................ 15
Return ratios are expected to improve going forward ..................................................... 15
Cluster Wise Business ..................................................................................... 16
Kerala cluster contributes 54% to the company’s revenue in FY24 ................................. 16
Karnataka and Maharashtra cluster contribute 30% to the company’s revenue ............ 17
Andhra and Telangana contribute 11% to the revenue ................................................... 18
Industry Overview .......................................................................................... 19
Key Risks ........................................................................................................ 22
Corporate Governance.................................................................................... 23
Promoters’ Shareholding ................................................................................ 23
Board Composition ......................................................................................... 23
Key management personnel ........................................................................... 25
Auditors of the company ................................................................................ 26
CSR Activities .................................................................................................................... 26
Company Background ..................................................................................... 27
What is Aster DM Hospital all about? .............................................................................. 27
Peer Comparison ............................................................................................ 27
Valuation and Recommendations ................................................................... 30
Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................ 31
Financial Statements ...................................................................................... 32
Public
North
West
25% Hospital
25% Beds
38%
Private
East
13%
Hospital
Beds
South 62%
37%
Source :GOI Source :GOI
Fig 3: North India total beds : 4.7 Lacs Fig 4: South India total beds: 7.0 Lacs
Himachal Chandigarh Puducherry
Pradesh 1% Andhra 1%
Jammu &
3% Kashmir Pradesh
Uttrakhand 12%
2% Karnataka
5%
Kerala 37%
14%
Haryana
8%
Uttar
Delhi Pradesh
8% 60% Telangana
14%
Fig 5: East India total beds : 2.4 Lacs Fig 6: West india total beds: 4.7 Lacs
Bihar
13% Chhattisgar Goa
Gujarat h 1%
Jharkhand 14% 4%
11%
West Bengal
Maharashtr
47% Madhya
a
Odisha Pradesh
48%
10% 14%
Fig 7: Kerala total beds 99.2K Fig 8: Aster DM Beds Distribution (4,867 beds)
Andhra and
Aster DM , 2.4% Telangana,
1047, 22%
Public Beds,
38.3%
Private Beds, Kerala, 2396,
59.3% 49%
Karnataka and
maharashtra,
1424, 29%
4867
4000
3641
2769
2333
1990
1691
1000
1000
2396
1378
500
720
470
300
0
Aster DM
Manipal Hospitals
Apollo Hospitals
Narayana Hrudalaya
Kovai Medical
KIMS Hospitals
Gleneagles Global
Kauvery Hospitals
0
Aster DM
Lakeshore
Apollo Hospitals
KIMS Kerala
Lourdes Hospital
Hospitals
Kerala, 2396,
Karnataka
49%
and Kerala
maharashtra 54%
30%
Karnataka
and
maharashtra,
1424, 29%
Source: Company, SMIFS Research Source: Company, SMIFS Research
The company is also looking for O&M Models and small bolt on acquisitions to expand the
capacity in South India. The company aims to concentrate on key markets such as
Coimbatore, Chennai etc.
According to the Ministry of Tourism in India, besides Chennai, major metropolitan areas
such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Hyderabad, and Kolkata have also observed significant
footfalls of Foreign Tourist Arrivals (FTAs) seeking medical treatment. Renowned for their
advancements and enriched pool of knowledge, talent, and expertise, these cities serve as
major Medical Value Tourism (MVT) hubs.
Additionally, Tier-2 MVT destinations like Cochin, Trivandrum, Coimbatore,
Vishakhapatnam, Ahmedabad, Jaipur, Chandigarh, Pune, among others, hold substantial
potential for further growth and development in the medical tourism sector.
Fig 19: Percentage of Medical FTAs with respect to total Fig 20: International patients mix of peers – Apollo wins the
FTAs race
25.0% 16%
14%
19.9%
20.0% 12%
10%
15.0% 8%
6%
10.0% 4%
7.4% 15%
6.1% 6.4% 6.7% 2%
5%
8%
6%
8%
6%
4.9% 5.0%
0%
5.0% 2.4% 2.9%
Aster DM
Fortis
Medanta
Max Healthcare
NH
Apollo
0.0%
CY14 CY15 CY16 CY17 CY18 CY19 CY20 CY21 CY22
Percentage of Medical FTAs wrt Total FTAs
Source: Ministry of Tourism, SMIFS Research Source: Ministry of Tourism, SMIFS Research
Strong brand equity in GCC but lower international patients mix in India
why so?
International patients contribute 5% to the company’s revenues and major patients comes
from countries like Maldives. However, despite having significant brand equity in GCC
countries, the international patients mix is still lower as compared to its peers such as Max,
Apollo, Fortis as major facilities of Aster are in Tier II and Tier III where the flight connectivity
is low. However, In Kochi and Bangalore hospitals of Aster the international revenue
contributes 10-12% to the respective hospitals which is higher than those of the peers in
the same market.
Source: Company
The demerger has sparked a notable rerating of Aster DM's India business, resulting in a
gradual narrowing of the valuation gap. As a result, the company's worth is now aligning
more closely with that of its Indian counterparts, marking a positive trend in its valuation
trajectory.
Source: Company
Each business now has its dedicated management team; Ms. Alisha Moopen has been
promoted to MD and Group CEO of the GCC business, while Dr. Azad Moopen will oversee
both operations. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, previously the Regional Chief Executive Officer for
Karnataka and Maharashtra, has been elevated to the position of Chief Operating Officer
(COO) of Aster DM Healthcare, India
Pre-segregation Post-segregation
Financial Metrics (9M FY24)
(GCC + India) (India)
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
34%
61%
75%
66%
40%
54%
85%
73%
30%
0%
KIMS Apollo Fortis Narayana HCG Medanta Max Rainbow Aster DM
Source: Company
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
54,000
46,600
60,000
57,600
10,000
-
KIMS Rainbow Aster DM Apollo
Source: Company
In Karnataka, Aster is only present in Bangalore, a Tier I city. The ARPOB is notably higher
compared to peers, indicating that a significant portion of Aster’s revenue is derived from
quaternary care services, leading to a higher ARPOB in this Tier I city. Since, large metro
has had inherent advantages like high per capita income, high insurance penetration and
propensity to pay for high end quaternary care facilities and more health awareness.
Also, Tier-1 cities have higher proportion of international patients which results in more
profitability for the hospital chains operating in these regions. For complex procedures,
usually patient in India travel to Tier-1 cities which lead to better case mix (high end
procedures) for the hospital chains. Since, Aster is also further expanding its operations in
Tier-1 cities like Bangalore it will help the company to increase its ARPOB further.
57,488
60,887
38,356
46,506
61,890
39,101
76,000
55,853
28,571
40,100
20,000
10,000
-
KIMS
Aster DM
Apollo
Fortis
Narayana
Yatharth
HCG
Rainbow
Medanta
Shalby
Max
Source: Company
30,000 40%
30%
20,000
20%
26,100
27,700
30,100
33,500
36,500
40,100
43,450
47,143
51,150
10,000
10%
63%
61%
56%
66%
68%
68%
66%
70%
67%
- 0%
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
8.0%
15%
30%
11%
9.8%
9.0%
8.4%
8.4%
9.1%
9.5%
9.9%
5%
6%
7%
9%
0% 7.5%
KIMS
Aster DM
NH
Yatharth
Medanta
Apollo
Rainbow
Fig 31: Revenue to grow at CAGR of 18% from FY24-FY27E Fig 32: Led by higher contribution from Kerala hospitals
70,000 50% 100%
11%
12%
10%
11%
16%
9%
17%
45% 90%
60,000
40% 80%
50,000 35% 70%
27%
30%
26%
27%
29%
33%
33%
30% 60%
40,000
25% 50%
30,000
20% 40%
23,840
29,941
36,989
43,225
51,270
60,626
10,000
5% 10%
57%
55%
57%
54%
52%
50%
49%
0 0% 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Revenues (In Rs. Mn) Growth % Kerala Karnataka and Maharashtra Andhra and Telangana
5%
1,590
3,550
4,491
5,780
7,385
9,286
0.5 2,000
0.7
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.4
0.0 0 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
EBITDA (In mn) EBITDA Margin %
Source: Company, SMIFS Research Estimates Source: Company, SMIFS Research Estimates
Fig 35: The consumable cost of Aster is higher than its peers due to labs and pharmacy
business
60%
52%
52%
51%
50%
40%
28%
26%
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
24%
23%
23%
23%
23%
23%
30%
22%
22%
22%
21%
21%
21%
20%
20%
20%
20%
18%
13%
20%
13%
10%
0%
KIMS
Aster DM
Fortis
Narayana
Apollo
Yatharth
Rainbow
HCG
Medanta
Max
26%
30%
25%
24%
22%
21%
25%
20%
19%
19%
19%
18%
18%
18%
18%
18%
17%
17%
17%
17%
17%
17%
16%
16%
16%
16%
16%
20%
14%
13%
12%
12%
12%
15%
10%
5%
0%
KIMS
Aster DM
Apollo
Fortis
Narayana
Yatharth
HCG
Rainbow
Medanta
Max
FY22 FY23 FY24
Fig 37: Other Expenses including doctor fees for Aster DM are moderate vis-à-vis most
of its large peers, however doctor’s cost is in-line with all the peers at 22%
44%
43%
50%
42%
42%
41%
41%
41%
41%
41%
41%
40%
39%
39%
45% 38%
37%
37%
37%
36%
36%
35%
35%
35%
34%
40%
32%
31%
30%
29%
28%
35%
23%
30%
21%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
KIMS
Aster DM
Narayana
Apollo
Fortis
Rainbow
Yatharth
HCG
Medanta
Max
Fig 38: EBITDA Margin of Aster is lower than its peers but will catch up in coming years
40%
34%
33%
31%
31%
35%
28%
28%
28%
27%
27%
27%
26%
26%
25%
24%
30%
24%
24%
23%
23%
21%
21%
21%
19%
25%
19%
19%
18%
18%
18%
18%
17%
17%
16%
15%
15%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
KIMS
Narayana
Aster DM
Apollo
Fortis
Yatharth
Max
HCG
Rainbow
Medanta
Shalby
4,468
15,000
11,171
2,305
5,000
5,608
Rs Mn
Rs Mn
10,000
0
FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
1,578
5,000
18,340
10,103
6,685
8,016
-5,000
-6,391
0
-10,000
FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
FCF
OCF
Source: Company, SMIFS Research Estimates Source: Company, SMIFS Research Estimates
11% 13%
12%
10% 12%
10% 9%
8% 8% 8%
6%
6%
6% 6%
4%
2%
0%
FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
ROE ROCE
Source: Company, SMIFS Research Estimates *Return ratios computed on Post Tax
16%
35,000 50% 8,000 25% 50%
14%
41% 45% 24% 45%
30,000 12% 7,000
28% 40%
19% 40%
6,000 23%
25,000 35% 35%
5,000 21%
20,000 30% 21% 30%
25% 4,000 25%
15,000 19%
20% 3,000 20%
10,000 15% 13% 15%
2,000
13,180
16,910
20,070
22,394
25,453
29,541
10% 10%
6,109
1,240
2,550
3,560
4,300
5,083
7,385
9,350
5,000 1,000
5% 5%
- 0% - 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Revenues (In Rs. Mn) Growth % EBITDA (In Rs. Mn) Margin %
Fig 44: Kerala ARPOB (In Rs) Fig 45: Kerala Bed Occupancy (%)
50,000 90%
45,000 80%
40,000 70%
35,000
60%
30,000
50%
25,000
40%
20,000
15,000 30%
20%
28,000
32,000
34,400
38,100
40,386
42,809
45,378
10,000
65%
75%
79%
79%
76%
75%
72%
5,000 10%
- 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Fig 46: Kerala Bed Capacity Fig 47: Kerala Operational Beds
4,000 3,000
3,500
2,500
3,000
2,500 2,000
2,000 1,500
1,500
1,000
1,000
1,395
1,575
1,734
1,827
1,999
2,172
2,477
1,894
2,027
2,236
2,396
2,596
2,935
3,489
500
500
0 0
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Fig 48: Karnataka & Maharashtra revenue Fig 49: Karnataka & Maharashtra EBITDA Margins (In %)
14,363
14,723
19,868
8%
4,330
6,550
8,170
5,000 10%
1,280
2,170
3,361
3,534
4,967
1,000 10%
330
830
5% 5%
3%
- 0% - 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Revenues (In Rs. Mn) Growth % EBITDA (In Rs. Mn) Margin %
Source: Company, SMIFS Research Source: Company, SMIFS Research
Fig 50: Karnataka & Maharashtra ARPOB (In Rs) Fig 51: Karnataka & Maharashtra Occupancy (%)
80,000 70%
70,000 60%
60,000
50%
50,000
40%
40,000
30%
30,000
20%
20,000
43,850
37,100
48,800
53,600
58,960
64,266
68,765
53%
60%
59%
61%
62%
65%
65%
10,000 10%
- 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Fig 52: Karnataka & Maharashtra Bed Capacity Fig 53: Karnataka & Maharashtra Operational Beds
2,500 1,400
1,200
2,000
1,000
1,500 800
600
1,000
400
500
1,076
1,218
1,034
1,007
1,424
1,583
1,583
1,933
200
966
644
722
790
946
967
0 0
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Fig 54: Andhra and Telangana revenue Fig 55: Andhra and Telangana EBITDA
33% 10%
6,000 35% 16%
13% 12% 1,000 14% 50%
30% 900 45%
5,000 19%
20% 25% 800 40%
-7% 13%
4,000 20% 700 35%
15% 600 16% 30%
3,000 10%
10% 500 25%
9%
400 20%
2,000 5%
300 15%
0%
2,790
3,700
3,440
4,120
4,652
5,190
5,710
690
320
412
587
748
909
-5% 100 5%
- -10% - 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Revenues (In Rs. Mn) Growth % EBITDA (In Rs. Mn) Margin %
Fig 56: Andhra and Telangana ARPOB (In Rs) Fig 57: Andhra and Telangana Occupancy Level (%)
32,000
60%
31,000
50%
30,000
40%
29,000 30%
28,000 20%
28,800
31,300
27,900
28,100
29,295
30,467
31,685
27,000 10%
40%
52%
50%
50%
51%
52%
55%
26,000 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Fig 58: Andhra and Telangana Bed capacity Fig 59: Andhra and Telangana Operational Beds
1,200
1,000
900
1,000
800
800 700
600
600 500
400
400
300
200
1,047
1,047
1,122
1,122
1,122
200
896
871
647
602
780
779
853
898
898
100
0 0
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25E FY26E FY27E
Fig 60: Healthcare delivery market poised to grow 13-15% over FY22-26
100%
60%
40% 6.1
1.9 3.5 3.9
20%
0%
FY15 FY22 FY23E FY26E
IPD OPD
Source: Crisil Report, SMIFS Research Estimates
The Indian healthcare industry for FY22 is estimated at USD 372 billion of which
hospitals carve out the majority share, i.e., about 35%, contributing about USD 132
billion. This is followed by domestic pharmaceuticals contributing about 15% i.e. USD
54 billion and the remaining is shared by diagnostics, medical equipment and insurance.
Fig 61: Number of Public Beds per 1000 people Fig 62: Healthcare industry demand breakup
14 100%
90%
12 31% 30% 27%
80% 35%
10 70%
8 60%
50%
6
40%
69% 70% 73%
4 30% 65%
20%
2
2.9 2.5 4.3 13 2.6 0.5 10%
0 0%
US UK China Japan Vietnam India FY16 FY21E FY22E FY25E
IPD OPD
Source: Company, SMIFS Research Source: Company, SMIFS Research
Others, 14%
Sudan, 1%
Yemen, 2%
Oman, 3%
Afghanistan, 6%
Maldives, 8%
Bangladesh, 61%
Iraq, 5%
Source: Niti.gov
The number of Foreign Tourist Arrivals (FTAs) in India on medical visa grew to an estimated
697,000 in 2019 from 495,056 in 2017.33 India’s medical visitors have historically come
primarily from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Oman, Bangladesh, Maldives, Nigeria, Kenya and Iraq.
Popular specialities for MVT in India include cardiac care, orthopaedics, organ
transplantation, neurosciences, oncology and bariatrics.
Increasingly, the focus on strong branding of alternative medicine and rejuvenation
therapies, along with an emphasis on wellness and prevention, is drawing patients to India
from across the globe. Wellness tourism that builds on India’s strengths in Ayurveda and
Yoga, in particular, is a fast-emerging and growing segment within India’s MVT sector.
Several major players like Apollo and the Manipal Group are setting up wellness centres,
with traditional healthcare remedies as a key focus of their offerings. Many hotels/resorts
in the country, especially in the southern States, are establishing Ayurveda Centres. Leading
tour operators have also included Ayurveda in their brochures.
General Risks
Competition from healthcare players
Aster DM operates in a competitive landscape with various multi-specialty chains vying for
market share. Notable competitors include Narayana, Apollo Hospitals, KIMS etc. The
presence of these competitors poses potential implications for Aster's business
performance.
Others
Potential factors that could lead to such adverse impacts include a decrease in patient
footfall, reputational harm, liabilities arising from medical negligence, natural calamities, or
any political unrest, disruption, disturbance, or prolonged economic downturn specifically
in the mentioned regions.
Promoters’ Shareholding
The promoters currently hold ~41.9% of the equity capital Union Investments Private
Limited holds the highest equity of 37.9%. The details of the shareholding and its movement
are indicated in the following table and chart:
Fig 67: Latest Promoter Shareholding
Particulars % Holding
Union Investments Private Limited, Mauritius 37.4
Union (Mauritius) Holdings Limited, Mauritius 4.0
Dr. Azad Moopen 0.4
Alisha Moopen 0.0
Ziham Moopen 0.0
Naseera Azad 0.0
Zeba Azad Moopen 0.0
Total 41.9
Source: Company Annual Report, SMIFS Research
42.0%
41.0%
40.0%
39.0%
41.9%
41.9%
38.0%
37.0%
37.9%
37.9%
37.9%
37.8%
36.0%
35.0%
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Board Composition
Independent directors constitute 50% of the board composition.
Fig 69: Board Composition (Rs in mn)
Name FY23 FY24
Independent director 6 5
Non-Executive Directors 4 3
Chairman & Managing Director, CEO 2 2
Source: Company Annual Report, SMIFS Research
Alfaone Medicals Private Limited - Financial assets - loans (Non current) 1,106.4 1669.0
Ms. Alisha Moopen is the Managing Director of Aster Group since February 2012, with
a distinguished career including roles as CEO of Aster Hospitals and Medcare & Medical
Centres – GCC and Deputy Managing Director for India business and overseeing the
strategic direction and development of the Company. A Chartered Accountant from ICAS
Deputy Managing
Ms. Alisha Moopen and a graduate of the University of Michigan and Harvard University, she's been
Director
recognized as a Young Global Leader by the World Economic Forum and has extensive
involvement in healthcare and global leadership organizations. Notable accolades
include being named among the Most Influential Women in the Arab World and the Top
100 World’s Greatest Leaders in Asia and GCC.
Mr. T. J. Wilson is a director of company & the group head–governance & corporate
affairs of AsterDM Healthcare. He holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce from the
university of Calicut, Kerala, India. He is also a member of the institute of chartered
Mr. T J Wilson Non-Executive Director accountants of India. In the past, he has worked with Koyenco Feeds Private Limited &
Parle (Exports) limited. He is responsible for overseeing the legal, secretarial &
governance function, internal audit & large portfolio of new hospital projects. He has
been a director of our company since April 20, 2009.
CSR Activities
In FY24 the company has spent (65.3 Mn) on Disaster management, rehabilitation, and
reconstruction along with Promoting education and livelihood Enhancement projects.
Prescribed
Avg Net Profit in Total Spends Spend as % of prescribed
Year Expenditure
Rs Mn (In Rs. Mn) limit
(In Rs. Mn)
FY24 677.3 13.5 14.0 103.7
FY23 277.8 5.7 7.2 126.3
Source: Annual Report 2023
Women's
health
Cardiac sciences
6%
14%
Orthopaedics
7%
Fig 75: Max has the highest occupancy amongst peers whereas Aster has more headroom to grow
75%
76%
75%
80%
68%
68%
68%
66%
66%
66%
65%
65%
64%
64%
63%
62%
61%
70%
59%
59%
58%
55%
54%
54%
53%
51%
50%
50%
60%
48%
46%
46%
46%
46%
45%
45%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
KIMS Apollo Fortis Narayana HCG Medanta Shalby Max Rainbow Yatharth Aster DM
FY22 FY23 FY24
Fig 76: Max has highest ARPOB amongst peers, Aster DM has long way to go…
76,000
61,890
80,000
60,887
60,431
59,000
57,488
57,274
55,853
55,101
54,547
70,000
51,668
51,056
49,315
48,932
46,506
45,327
60,000
40,100
39,101
38,356
38,042
36,697
36,500
34,842
34,795
33,500
33,329
31,916
50,000
31,347
29,946
28,571
26,538
25,323
24,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
-
KIMS Apollo Fortis Narayana HCG Medanta Shalby Max Rainbow Yatharth Aster DM
98,690
86,769
1,00,000
79,891
68,929
62,976
80,000
57,176
54,060
50,182
45,626
45,248
60,000
39,315
37,013
36,989
32,751
28,190
26,942
24,981
23,430
21,977
21,666
40,000
19,121
16,944
16,508
13,978
12,969
11,736
9,738
9,340
8,049
6,989
6,705
5,203
20,000
4,009
0
KIMS Apollo Fortis Narayana HCG Medanta Shalby Max Rainbow Yatharth Aster DM
Fig 78: EBITDA Margin of Aster DM is lower than its peers but expected to catchup soon
40%
34%
33%
31%
31%
35%
28%
28%
28%
27%
27%
27%
26%
26%
25%
30%
24%
24%
24%
23%
23%
21%
21%
21%
25%
19%
19%
19%
18%
18%
18%
18%
17%
17%
16%
15%
15%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
KIMS Apollo Fortis Narayana HCG Medanta Shalby Max Rainbow Yatharth Aster DM
Source: Bloomberg, SMIFS Research *For Apollo hospitals, only hospital business is compared with its peers
Fig 79: Bed capacity of Apollo is the highest amongst the peers, the rest are catching up…
14,000
12,142
12,408
12,500
12,000
10,000
6,186
6,074
8,000
5,433
4,867
4,317
4,100
4,100
4,100
4,000
3,975
3,940
3,905
6,000
3,412
3,400
3,064
2,823
2,571
2,571
2,200
2,036
2,036
2,012
2,012
2,012
1,935
4,000
1,655
1,500
1,405
1,405
1,100
2,000
-
KIMS Apollo Fortis Narayana HCG Medanta Shalby Max Rainbow Yatharth Aster DM
FY22 FY23 FY24
Fig 81: 1-year forward P/E Fig 82: 1-year forward EV/EBITDA
100.0
36.0
90.0
32.0
80.0
28.0
70.0 24.0
20.0
60.0
16.0
50.0
12.0
40.0 8.0
Apr-22 Nov-22 Jun-23 Jan-24 Aug-24 Apr-22 Nov-22 Jun-23 Jan-24 Aug-24
We /I, the above-mentioned Research Analyst(s) of SMIFS Limited (in short “SMIFS / the Company”), authors and the
names subscribed to this Research Report, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this Research Report
accurately reflect our views about the subject issuer(s) or securities and distributed as per SEBI (Research Analysts)
Regulations 2014. We also certify that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the
specific recommendation(s) or view(s) in this Research Report. It is also confirmed that We/I, the above mentioned
Research Analyst(s) of this Research Report have not received any compensation from the subject companies mentioned
in the Research Report in the preceding twelve months and do not serve as an officer, director or employee of the
subject companies mentioned in the Research Report.
SMIFS Limited is engaged in the business of Stock Broking, Depository Services, Portfolio Management and Distribution
of Financial Products. SMIFS Limited is registered as Research Analyst Entity with Securities & Exchange Board of India
(SEBI) with Registration Number – INH300001474.
SMIFS and our associates might have investment banking and other business relationship with a significant percentage
of companies covered by our Research Analysts. SMIFS generally prohibits its analysts, persons reporting to analysts and
their relatives from maintaining a financial interest in the securities or derivatives of any companies that the analysts
cover.
The information and opinions in this Research Report have been prepared by SMIFS and are subject to change without
any notice. The Research Report and information contained herein is strictly confidential and meant solely for the
selected recipient and may not be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed, in part or in whole, to any
other person or to the media or reproduced in any form, without prior written consent of SMIFS Limited. While we
would endeavor to update the information herein on a reasonable basis, SMIFS is under no obligation to update or keep
the information current. Also, there may be regulatory, compliance or other reasons that may prevent SMIFS from doing
so. Non-rated securities indicate that rating on a particular security has been suspended temporarily and such
suspension is in compliance with applicable regulations and/or policies of SMIFS, in circumstances where SMIFS might
be acting in an advisory capacity to this company, or in certain other circumstances.
This Research Report is based on information obtained from public sources and sources believed to be reliable, but no
independent verification has been made nor is its accuracy or completeness guaranteed. This Research Report and
information herein is solely for informational purpose and shall not be used or considered as an offer document or
solicitation of offer to buy or sell or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. Securities as defined in clause
(h) of section 2 of the Securities Contract Act, 1956, includes Financial Instruments, Currency and Commodity
Derivatives. Though disseminated to all the customers simultaneously, not all customers may receive this Research
Report at the same time. SMIFS will not treat recipients as customers by virtue of their receiving this Research Report.
Nothing in this Research Report constitutes investment, legal, accounting and tax advice or a representation that any
investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your specific circumstances. The securities discussed and opinions
expressed in this Research Report may not be suitable for all investors, who must make their own investment decisions,
based on their own investment objectives, financial positions and needs of specific recipient. This may not be taken in
substitution for the exercise of independent judgment by any recipient. The recipient should independently evaluate
the investment risks. The value and return on investment may vary because of changes in interest rates, foreign
exchange rates or any other reason. SMIFS accepts no liabilities whatsoever for any loss or damage of any kind arising
SMIFS shall not be liable for any delay or any other interruption which may occur in presenting the data due to any
reason including network (Internet) reasons or snags in the system, breakdown of the system or any other equipment,
server breakdown, maintenance shutdown, breakdown of communication services or inability of SMIFS to present the
data. In no event shall SMIFS be liable for any damages, including without limitation direct or indirect, special, incidental,
or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising in connection with the data presented by the SMIFS through this
report.
Participants in foreign exchange transactions may incur risks arising from several factors, including the following: (a)
Exchange Rates can be volatile and are subject to large fluctuations; (b) the value of currencies may be affected by
numerous market factors, including world and notional economic, political and regulatory events, events in Equity &
Debt Markets and changes in interest rates; and (c) Currencies may be subject to devaluation or government imposed
Exchange Controls which could affect the value of the Currency. Investors in securities such as Currency Derivatives,
whose values are affected by the currency of an underlying security, effectively assume currency risk.
Since associates of SMIFS are engaged in various financial service businesses, they might have financial interests or
beneficial ownership in various companies including the subject company/companies mentioned in this Research
Report.
SMIFS and its Associates, Officers, Directors, Employees, Research Analysts including their relatives worldwide may: (i)
from time to may have long or short positions in, and buy or sell the Securities, mentioned herein or (ii) be engaged in
any other transaction involving such Securities and earn brokerage or other compensation of the Subject Company/
companies mentioned herein or act as an Advisor or Lender/Borrower to such Companies or have other
potential/material Conflict of Interest with respect to any recommendation and related information and opinions at the
time of the publication of the Research Report or at the time of Public Appearance.
SMIFS does not have proprietary trades but may at a future date, opt for the same with prior intimation to Clients/
Investors and extant Authorities where it may have proprietary long/short position in the above Scrip(s) and therefore
should be considered as interested.
The views provided herein are general in nature and do not consider Risk Appetite or Investment Objective of any
particular Investor; Clients/ Readers/ Subscribers of this Research Report are requested to take independent
professional advice before investing, however the same shall have no bearing whatsoever on the specific
recommendations made by the analysts, as the recommendations made by the analysts are completely independednt
views of the Associates of SMIFS even though there might exist an inherent conflict of interest in some of the stocks
mentioned in the Research Report.
The information provided herein should not be construed as invitation or solicitation to do business with SMIFS.
SMIFS encourages independence in Research Report preparation and strives to minimize conflict in preparation of
Research Report. Accordingly, neither SMIFS and their Associates nor the Research Analysts and their relatives have any
material conflict of interest at the time of publication of this Research Report or at the time of the Public Appearance, if
any.
SMIFS or its associates might have managed or co-managed public offering of securities for the subject company or
might have been mandated by the subject company for any other assignment in the past twelve months.
SMIFS or its associates might have received any compensation from the companies mentioned in the Research Report
during the period preceding twelve months from the date of this Research Report for services in respect of managing or
co-managing public offerings, corporate finance, investment banking, brokerage services or other advisory service in a
merger or specific transaction from the subject company.
SMIFS or its associates might have received any compensation for products or services other than investment banking
or brokerage services from the subject companies mentioned in the Research Report in the past twelve months.
SMIFS or its associates or its Research Analysts did not receive any compensation or other benefits whatsoever from the
subject companies mentioned in the Research Report or third party in connection with preparation of the Research
Report.
Compensation of Research Analysts is not based on any specific Investment Banking or Brokerage Service Transactions.
The Research Analysts might have served as an officer, director or employee of the subject company.
SMIFS and its Associates, Officers, Directors, Employees, Research Analysts including their relatives worldwide may have
been engaged in market making activity for the companies mentioned in the Research Report.
SMIFS may have issued other Research Reports that are inconsistent with and reach different conclusion from the
information presented in this Research Report.
A graph of daily closing prices of the securities/commodities is also available at www.nseindia.com and/or
www.bseindia.com, www.mcxindia.com and/or www.icex.com.
SMIFS submit’ s that no material disciplinary action has been taken on the Company by any Regulatory Authority
impacting Equity Research Analysis activities in last 3 years.
This Research Report is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or
resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability
or use would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject SMIFS and affiliates to any registration or licensing
requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities described herein may or may not be eligible for sale in all
jurisdictions or to certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this document may come are required to
inform themselves of and to observe such restriction.
Contact us:
SMIFS Limited. (https://www.smifs.com/)
Compliance Officer:
Sudipto Datta,
5F Vaibhav, 4 Lee Road, Kolkata 700020, West Bengal, India.
Contact No.: +91 33 4011 5401 / +91 33 6634 5401
Email Id.: [email protected]
Mumbai Office:
206/207, Trade Centre, Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC), Bandra East, Mumbai – 400051, India
Contact No.: (D) +91 22 4200 5508, (B) +91 22 4200 5555
Email Id: [email protected]
Kolkata Office:
Vaibhav, 4 Lee Road, Kolkata 700020, West Bengal, India.
Contact No.: (D) +91 33 6634 5408, (B) +91 33 4011 5400
Email Id: [email protected]