Using sources together - This type of question requires the overall
‘message ox purpose to be established. This is mare than just comparison
Of surace detail, Sometimes sources will agree on some points of detal
yet disagree on overall message ar purpose, answers should point
these ifferences, and similarities, nd you may wish to use quotes from
the sources. Some questions require more than evaluation but also
comparability for elabilty or usefuress, Questions may look similar to
the folowing:
How far do these sources agree about..?
How diferensimilar are these sources?
'sone ofthese sources more useful as evidence about.”
Which source do you trust more as evidence about?
'sone source more usefulfelable than the oer for.?
Are you surprise? Here i nacesay to use cote hronlege
about the peson or egansation to workout wheter cot ou sre
surrey the message, purpose or acon within te Source that ets
totha person or pao
The fnal question Source based question papers wil nce sources
hich suppor te hypothes inthe questo and others which age
Yeu stout ook at enh supporting source tn ond expan des:
with efdence- how tat hat parce source supports re Mp
The same proces sou then be flowed fr hase sources Wado nat
“poo the hypothe. n eth instances your estore shoud be supported
by evidence. Remember that thee questons te about he sources or
he far they suport the hypothesis and not whether the hype
Scot rte at id on te sues ot oa
nowledge shoul be used ny oro and for your rays
the sources, vere = root
Importance Significance Here, avers must demonstat an abit
{0.00 the mporance and gticance of vets, developments and
india’ An eampeof ths approach might be
How significant was the oppestion of big business in iting the
impact of Roosevels New Dea? Exlain your answer.
This question asks about the significance of big business, A good
answer to this question might assess the imoact in terms of what
\was achieved by big business opposition and also consider where big
business opposition was lss succesful. This might involve the nature of
impact such as how powerful was the impact". This would then allow
consideration thatthe New Deal continued in spite of opposition, since
this was not sufficient drastic,
‘Throughout ths revision guide, you wil find examples ofthe diferent
types of questions listed here, to alow you to practise and get familar
With the clfferet sivles of questions. Your teacher should aso be able
to provide past papers to hela you prepare for examination,
Were the peace treaties of 1919-23 fair?
KEY IDEAS
This section wil:
Describe the roles ofthe “Big Thee” in the peacemaking proces.
> Examine the reasons fr ther individual motives and aims.
> Analyse to what extent each of them achieved ther as,
Consider the impact of the treaties on Germany ards ales
Evaluate the view thatthe treaties were “usted atthe time
Background
‘The Fist World War came to an end in November 1918. By the end ofthe
\war over 15 millon people had been Kled, the economy of Europe was in
‘uns and both the Russian and Austro-Hungarian empires had colapsed,
In Russia the Bobhevis had come to power.
In January 1919 delegates from 32 countries were invited to meetin Paris at
‘the palace of Vesailes. Each nation present wanted a settement that would
last. The defeated nations and Soviet Russa were not invited to attend.
{At this conference five treaties were drawn up and refered to collectively
435 the Versailles Settlement. The main ane was the Treaty of Verslles.
whieh dealt with Germany Th other treaties dealt with Germanys ales.
‘he lesders of Britain, France and the United States played a significant
part inthe decision-making and became known asthe "Big Three”
Each of these leaders had his own motives and they al had different
‘outcomes in mind. Woadkow Wison from the United States believed
his objectives could be achieved through hs “Fourteen Points”. Georges
Clemenceau representing France Wanted future sect for hes county while
David Uoyd George from Britain wanted to avoid intense German grievance.
However, diferences in opinion on how this should be achieved led
to disagreements and compromises being made that resulted in ferce
iticism ofthe Versails Settlement, and especially the Treaty of Versailles
Germany fet that they had been treated too harshly and that they should
Seek revenge. Others thought the punishment should have been harsher
The background to the Versailles Settlement
A the end of the Fst World War, Germany ands alles—Austa-Hungary,
Turkey and Bulgaria-—had fed in tee attempt to dominate Europe. There
were several key factors at play asthe Versailles Settlement was Gscussed
Every country involved wanted to prevent another war Four years
cof war had devastated many parts of Europe. Millon of solders on bath
sides were kiled or inured
Towards the end ofthe war the defeated powers sought an armistice
This meant hostites were suspended. The armistice terms had an
important effect on the terms ofthe peace teaties themselves, a5 the
principle of reparations was established‘There had been a revolution in Russia: The Bolsheviks had come to
pone folowing revolution. A left-wing group cften known as communis,
‘they pledged to destroy capitalism throughout the word
Germany had deat withthe Russians inthe Teaty of Brest-tovsk: the
treaty took large amounts of land and 2596 of the population. The Ales
bleved that if Gemany had won they would have done the same 10
Britain and France
‘The mood within countries in 1919: There vas strong feling in Bain
and France that Germany should be held responsible forthe war and
should pay fr al the damage and destruction,
1.1 What were the motives and aims of the
Big Three at Versailles?
‘The roles of the “Big Three” in the peacemaking process
Clemenceau motives and aims were:
‘+ to ensure te future security of France at Germany had attacked
France twice in the previous 50 years
‘+10 punish Germany severly leaving it weak
‘+ the permanent disarmament of Germany
* a very high level of reparations to pay forthe destruction caused
by Germany
1 the tum of Akace-Lorane to France
+ the Rhineland to become an independent state so that France no
longer shared a common berder with Germany
‘the Saar Basin tobe transferred to France
Wisons motives and aims ware:
+ a fai and asting peace to prevent Germany seeking revenge
+ aimed to allow nations to decide ther own political future
(ol determinaton)
+ international cooperation with countries werking together to
setle disputes peacefully inthe future
‘+ his Fourteen Points
Uoyd Georges motives and aims were:
‘+a “ust and fim” peace which avoided Germany seeking revenge
but satisfied the Brtish people
+ ashare of Germany’ colonies
+ the economic revival of Europe and the German economy so
trade would be re-established
‘+ to reduce the threat ofthe spread of communism from Russia
‘+ tomaintan the strength and power ofthe British navy to protect
Britain colonies
+ 10 persuade Clemenceau to make key concessions to ensure
France didnot become the dominant power in Europe,
2 Fg 13d Gee
1.2 What were the main terms of the Treaty
of Versailles?
Key terms of the Treaty of Versailles
‘War Guilt (Article 231): Germany was forced 1 accep total responsibilty
{or stating the war
Reparations: Germany had to accep lability forthe damage caused by
the war and pay eparations. The figure fr reparations was not decided at
Versailles. twas finaly agreed in 1921 and was seta £6,600 malin.
The Rhineland: The Rhineland was to bea demiltarised zone, German
troops were not alowed inthe area at formed the border between
Germany and France, n ation there was o bean Aled ary of
‘occupation onthe west bank ofthe Rhine for 15 years
Anschluss: Germany ands former aly Austria were not alowed to unite
Disarmament: The Germany army was ited to 100,000. The soldiers
had tobe volunteers as conscription was banned. No tanks or heavy
artilery military or naval ait force, or submarines were permitted. The navy
was restricted to_36 warships including 6 battleships and 15,000 sar.
League of Nations: An international police force was ta be set upto
prevent future war.
Decisions about territory under the terms ofthe Treaty of Versailles.
Territory Decision
‘Alsace Lorene Returned to France
‘The Saar Basin To be administered bythe League of Nations
for 18 yeas. After tha time a plebiscite would
be held to decide it should belong to France,
to Germany or remain under League contol
Danzig Was to become a Free City administered by
the League of Nations. Poland could use the
port and the strip of land known asthe
Polish Corridor
Eupen, Malmedy and
Moresnet
Tenstered to Bagium:
North Schieswig TTansfered to Denmark
‘West rusia, Posen and | Tansfered to Poland
arts of Upper Silesia
Meret Transfered to Uthuania
ston, Lata and
Uthuania
‘Set yp as independent states.
Became mandates ofthe League of Nations,
‘which effectively meant that Britain and France