Journal of

Marine Science
and Engineering

Review
Fish Farming Techniques: Current Situation and Trends
Glacio Souza Araujo 1 , José William Alves da Silva 1 , João Cotas 2 and Leonel Pereira 2, *

1 Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceará–IFCE, Campus Aracati, CE 040, km 137.1,
Aracati 62800-000, Brazil
2 MARE–Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre/ARNET-Aquatic Research Network, Department of Life
Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +351-239-855-229

Abstract: World aquaculture is increasingly diversified and intensive, due to the use of new technolo-
gies, having grown a lot in recent decades and contributed significantly to improving food security
and reducing poverty in the world, with fish farming being a promising activity for the production of
protein with high nutritional value. The large aquaculture companies that recognize the potential of
this important modality have invested in the study and production of various productive segments
of the most diverse species of fish. This review article aims to provide information on the world
panorama of marine fish farming, with the main systems and production stages of the most important
organisms with commercial potential, aiming to achieve a highly sustainable production, with high
nutritional content and benefits for human health. The production of live feed in the larval stage
should be highlighted, in order to optimize survival and weight gain. In addition, trends in the culti-
vation of estuarine and saltwater fish will be detailed in this review, such as the use of biotechnology
and technological innovations, cultivations integration, and biosecurity. Thus, innovative methods to
optimize the farming system need to be more ecosustainable, reducing the negative impacts on the
environmental level.

Keywords: aquaculture; culture; fish farm; production; innovations

Citation: Araujo, G.S.; Silva, J.W.A.d.;
Cotas, J.; Pereira, L. Fish Farming
Techniques: Current Situation and
Trends. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598. 1. Introduction
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111598
Aquaculture is the cultivation of aquatic organisms, with human intervention in
Academic Editors: Ka Hou CHU and the breeding process to increase production in operations, such as reproduction, storage,
Gianluca Sarà feeding, and protection against predators, among others [1].
According to the FAO data, in 2020, the world fish production (fishing and aquaculture)
Received: 3 August 2022
was approximately 177.8 million tonnes, with 90.3 million tonness coming from fisheries
Accepted: 18 October 2022
and 87.5 million tons coming from aquaculture. World exports of aquatic products in 2020,
Published: 30 October 2022
excluding algae, totaled about 60 million tonnes of live weight, worth 151 billion USD. Only
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral in relation to aquaculture was the largest amount produced in fresh water (54.4 million
with regard to jurisdictional claims in tons, 62.2% of the world total), when compared to brackish and salt water (33.1 million
published maps and institutional affil- tons, 37.8% of the world total). Global aquaculture production retained its growth trend
iations. in 2020 amid the worldwide spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, albeit with differences
among the regions and among the producing countries within each region. Finfish farming
remained steady, with minimal fluctuation around 66 percent, and accounted for the largest
share of world aquaculture for decades. In 2020, farmed finfish reached 57.5 million
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
tonnes (146.1 billion USD), including 49.1 million tonnes (109.8 billion USD) from inland
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
aquaculture and 8.3 million tonnes (36.2 billion USD) from mariculture in the sea and
distributed under the terms and
coastal aquaculture on the shore [2].
conditions of the Creative Commons
Additionally, according to FAO [2], in 2020, the group of organisms that presented the
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// greatest prominence in aquaculture was freshwater fish, followed by seaweed, showing
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ the great importance of fish farming in food production worldwide. According to the data,
4.0/). aquaculture development has exhibited different fluctuating patterns in growth among

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111598 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jmse

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 2 of 35

regions. In the largest producing region, Asia, the growth in the 1990–2020 period was
relatively steady in the major aquaculture countries, although with decreasing growth rates.
Other regions had had relatively fluctuating growth in the same period, while experiencing
negative growth in some years. Asia has overwhelmingly dominated world aquaculture
for decades, producing 91.6 percent of global aquatic animals and algae in 2020. However,
there are huge differences in the level of aquaculture development between countries
within Asia. Countries such as Mongolia and Timor-Leste, as well as some countries in
Central and West Asia, are in need of accelerated aquaculture development to exploit their
aquaculture potential [2].
The proportion of fisheries and the aquaculture production of the aquatic animals
used for direct human consumption increased significantly from 67 percent in the 1960s to
about 89 percent in 2020 (that is over 157 million tonnes of the 178 million tonnes of total
fisheries and aquaculture production, excluding algae). The remaining 11 percent (over
20 million tonnes) was used for non-food purposes; of this, 81 percent (over 16 million
tonnes) was reduced to fishmeal and fish oil, while the rest (about 4 million tonnes) was
largely utilized as ornamental fish, for culture (e.g., fry, fingerlings, or small adults for on
growing), as bait, in pharmaceutical uses, for pet food, as raw material for direct feeding in
aquaculture, and for the raising of livestock and fur animals [2]. Fish farming is a modern
agricultural production system. To obtain the planned results, modern methods must
be used, based on scientific, ecological, technological, and economic principles [3]. For
the sustainability and competitiveness of fish farming, it is not enough just to fit it into
the current environmental legislation, but it is necessary to define the good management
practices (GMPs) that establish adequate procedures, regarding the ideal stocking density,
the intensity of the cultivations, and the maximum amount to be used for both feed and
chemical and organic fertilizers, among others, so that it can operate with zero effluent and
harvesting techniques that minimize the contribution of both solids and nutrients to the
environment. For this, it is necessary that the ponds be built properly, and the existing ones
adapted, so that fish farming can develop in a responsible and competitive way [4].
Aquatic animal farming systems are very diverse, in terms of culture methods, prac-
tices, facilities, and integration with other agricultural activities. Land ponds remain the
most common type of facility used for freshwater aquaculture. However, in recent years,
rapid and significant advances in improving freshwater aquaculture farming systems,
integrated with agricultural systems, have resulted not only in higher productivity and
better efficiency in the use of resources, but also in an impact on the environment [5].
According to the institution, in freshwater aquaculture, the dominant position of fish
has been gradually reducing, from 97.2% in 2000 to 91.5% in 2018, reflecting the strong
growth of other groups of species, particularly the creation of crustaceans in freshwater
in Asia, including prawns, crayfish, and crabs. Thus, fish farming, the most diversified
subsector of aquaculture, contains 27 species and groups of species, which represented
more than 90% of the total fish produced in 2018, where the twenty most important species
represented 83.6% of the total fish production. Compared with fish, fewer species of
crustaceans, mollusks, and other aquatic animals are farmed [5].
According to the institution, in the global production of aquaculture in brackish and
salt water in 2018, the biggest highlights were mollusks, with 17.3 million tons, followed
by fishes (7.32 million tons) and crustaceans (5.73 million tons); fish, that is, marine fish,
farming ranked second in the segment, in relation to the volume produced in the world in
2018 [5].
In this review, we will address some of the main fish currently cultivated, highlighting
marine aquaculture. It is worth noting that the production of live food in the larval stage
will be highlighted, aiming to optimize survival and weight gain. In addition, trends in the
cultivation of freshwater, estuarine, and saltwater fish will be detailed, such as the use of
biotechnology and genetics, nutrition, technological innovations, cultivations integration,
health, and biosecurity.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 3 of 35

2. Considerations about World Fish Farming

In marine and coastal aquaculture, production is currently concentrated mainly on
crustaceans and mollusks, with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) being the species whose
production has expanded the most in recent years. Other species that also had a significant
increase in production were European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and gilthead (Sparus
aurata). In some European countries, technological developments have made the sea bass
and snapper industries grow remarkably in the past decade [6].
There are few species produced on a large scale and at costs that satisfy the items
established by the market, such as some mollusks and Atlantic salmon. The distinction
made, in relation to these two market segments, is relevant, due to the high expectations
that aquaculture raises at a global level [7].
The success of salmon farming in Norway and Chile is known worldwide. The
governments of these countries have stimulated the production of Atlantic salmon, S. salar,
with the feasibility of spaces for aquaculture in coastal waters. There are thousands of
kilometers of practically intact coastline and hundreds of sheltered areas, where marine
farms find ideal conditions for their implementation and development. Countries whose
coastlines do not have natural shelters have the option of farms in the open sea (“off
shore”) [8]. Still, according to the author of [8], the great challenge is to develop structures
capable of withstanding the severe disturbances caused by bad weather. Thus, large
aquaculture companies that recognize the potential of this new modality, with advantages
in the environmental component, as well, have invested in researching more resistant and
functional models. Its installation in deeper oceanic areas, far from the coast, aims to take
advantage of the best water quality, as it is far from riverside pollution. On the other hand,
it does not suffer from the competition resulting from the great real estate speculation and
the use of these spaces for water sports and recreation.
Preliminary studies with “Pacific threadfin” (Moi) in Hawaii, sea bass and pompano
in the Mediterranean, salmon in the United States and Norway, “yellowtail” in Japan,
“milkfish” in the Philippines, and “cobia” in Taiwan have provided promising results.
The question that arises is: which countries will have the financial capacity to adopt this
technology [7]?
In developing countries, with the exception of marine shrimp, aquaculture production
was mainly omnivorous, herbivorous, or filterer fishes [9].

3. Recirculation System in Fish Farming

The water recirculation system in aquaculture has aroused great interest worldwide.
However, its production in a commercial scale has not yet been achieved, even with the
advances that research has provided in the past few decades [10]. Energy costs, associated
with intensive fish production, are the main obstacles to expanding investments in this
technology. Biological filtration, aeration, water circulation, and temperature control are
necessary for obtaining good results. Therefore, the use of motors, pumps, heaters, and
ventilation devices make energy a fundamental element in the entire process [11]. Although,
in parts, it is not yet possible to confirm the economic viability of this system, as it largely
depends on the balance between the high capital to be invested and operating costs [12].
If the water recirculation system intends to compete directly with other forms of
production, such as excavated ponds and cages, the need to reduce costs cannot interfere
with the quality of the water that must be supplied for long periods, because the fattening
process only becomes profitable if repeated constantly [13]. At high densities, the possi-
bility of reusing water is an important alternative to conventional systems that normally
impose environmental restrictions and generate conflicts over the availability of land and
water [14]. According to Blancheton [15], this system allows for the rapid growth of fish
and the adequate use of natural resources, advantages that can undoubtedly favor its
economic viability.
Feeding fish in captivity is processed differently from what happens in a natural
environment, where decisive factors, such as the nutritional contribution of natural aquatic
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 4 of 35

organisms in the farming ponds, as well as the effect of food on water quality and loss
of nutrients, if the food is not consumed immediately, interfere with the zootechnical
performance. The adoption of more effective cultivation technologies, which allow for
good growth rates, reaching industrial production is only possible with food that meets the
nutritional requirements of the species. Thus, in highly modified environments, such as
floating cages, “raceways”, or ponds stocked with high densities, successful fish farming
depends on nutritionally balanced foods [16].
The deficiency of a single nutrient in the diet, combined with stressors agents inherent
to confinement, can compromise growth, feed conversion, handling tolerance, and disease
resistance, causing inadequate productive performance and high mortality [17].
Almost all commercially cultivated marine species have carnivorous feeding habits;
therefore, their dietary protein requirements are relatively high. Thus, feeding is one of the
most important aspects in the cultivation of aquatic organisms, as the costs can become
rather high, depending on the feeding strategy adopted [18].
Araujo et al. [19] evaluated the zootechnical performance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis
niloticus, varying the amount of daily feeding in the masonry tanks for 154 days, and
observed that this species, being fed in daily amounts of 20 and 30% of food (morning) and
20 and 30% of food (afternoon), showed a better zootechnical performance at the end of
the experiment, when compared to the control, mainly noticed in biomass, final average
weight, and feed conversion.

4. Importance of Live Food in Aquaculture

The supply of live food optimizes the growth and weight gain in the first days of the
lives of the cultivated species, with several technological strategies aiming to reduce costs
and increasing production, without losing essential nutritional characteristics [20].
The larval stage of cultivated aquatic organisms demonstrates a certain need for
care, regarding food and nutrition, as this stage is where high mortalities occur, due to
inappropriate use and choice of food to be offered [21]. During this phase, in the first
days of life, many larvae of different species are not able to consume inert food, and the
individuals still do not have the complete digestive tract, making it difficult to digest and
absorb the nutrients present in the food. As an alternative, the use of live food enables
production in larvicultures, with increased feed efficiency [22].
Live food constitutes a large part of the diet of cultivated species, due to its excellent
nutritional potential, as it has a high-value biochemical composition, mobility, and variable
sizes and formats, important characteristics to be offered as food for a vast number of
species of cultivable aquatic organisms. Other essential factors required for safe production
are ease of cultivation, resistance to contamination, and rapid growth [23].
Several organisms are used as live food, highlighting microalgae, rotifers, copepods,
cladocerans, and brine shrimp as the most produced. Other species are also offered, such as
polychaetes, micro-worms, beetles, and insect and mosquito larvae, mainly in ornamental
aquaculture [24].
Microalgae are the most used live food, being the basis of the modified food chain
in aquaculture, as they serve as food for both cultivated species and live food. They have
a high content of protein and polyunsaturated fatty acids, as well as essential pigments,
vitamins, and minerals. The strains used in aquaculture, in this context, have dimensions
from 0.2 to 500 µm and are cultivated in fresh or saltwater environments, enriched with nu-
trients, according to the microalgal species cultivated. The most used are those of the genera
Arthrospira (Cyanobacteria), Chaetoceros, Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), Chlorella, Dunaliella,
Tetraselmis (Chlorophyta), Nannochloropsis (Ochrophyta, Eustigmatophyceae), Isochrysis
(Haptophyta, Coccolithophyceae), and Schizochytrium (Labyrinthulea) [25]. Table 1 shows
the classes, genera, and main species of the microalgae currently cultivated as live food in
aquaculture and their utilization. Table 2 shows the zooplankton and micro-worms most
used as live food in aquaculture.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 5 of 35

Table 1. Classes, genera, and species of major currently named microalgae grown for food in
aquaculture and their main utilization. FFL: food for fish larvae; FBML: food for bivalve mollusc
larvae; FSL: food for shrimp larvae. Source: modified and updated from Silva et al. [25] and
Muller-Feuga [26].

Class Genus Species Main Utilization

Cyanophyceae
Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis, maxima FFL
(blue-green algae)
Skeletonema costatum, pseudocostatum FBML, FSL
Bacillariophyceae Phaeodactylum tricornutum FBML, FSL
(diatoms) Chaetoceros calcitrans, gracilis, punilum FBML, FSL
Thalassiosira pseudonana FBML
minutissima, virginica,
Chlorella FFL
grossii
Chlorophyceae
Dunaliella tertiolecta, salina FFL, FSL
(green algae)
Nannochloris atomus FBML
Haematococcus pluvialis FFL
Tetraselmis
Prasinophyceae suecica, striata, chuii FFL, FBML, FSL
(Platymonas)
(scaled green algae)
Pyramimonas virginica FBML
Cryptophyceae Rhodomonas salina, baltica, reticulata FBML, FSL
Eustigmatophyceae Nannochloropsis oculata FFL, FSL
Prymnesiophyceae Isochrysis galbana, aff. Galbana,
FBML, FSL
(Haptophyceae) Pavlova (Monochrysis) ‘Tahiti’ (T-iso) lutheri, salina
Dinophyceae
Crypthecodinium cohnii FFL
(dinoflagellates)
Thraustochytriidae Schizochytrium sp. FFL

Table 2. Zooplankton and micro-worms most used as live food in aquaculture. FFL: food for fish
larvae; FSL: food for shrimp larvae. Source: modified from Silva et al. [22].

Organism Genus Species Main Utilization

Rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis, plicatilis FFL, FSL
Daphnia carinata, magna
Cladocera Ceriodaphnia carnuta FFL, FSL
Moina macrocopa, micrura
californicus, brevicornis,
Tigriopus
japonicus
Tisbe biminiensis, holothuriae
Copepod Acartia tonsa, clausi, hudsonica, omorii FFL, FSL
Paracalanus parvus
Cyclops bicuspidatus, strenuus
Thermocyclops parahastatus, parvus,
thailandensis
Artemia Artemia franciscana, salina FFL, FSL
Enchytraeus albidus
Micro-worms and Paramecium caudatum
FFL
Protozoan Anguillula silusiae
Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri

Rotifers range in size from 50 to 2000 µm, acting as a nutritional capsule, transferring
nutrients required by larvae of the cultivated aquatic organisms. Its reproduction is by
parthenogenesis, making cultivation easier and faster. The two most used species as live
food are Brachionus rotundiformis and B. plicatilis [27].
Copepods are more numerous and diversified in the marine environment, with sizes
of 0.3 to 3.2 mm. They have sexual reproduction and present sexual dimorphism. Its
cultivation alternates from the selected individuals to the wild ones collected in natural
environments. In the feeding of fish and shrimp, copepods act as bio-capsules, transferring
energy from microalgae and enriched foods. Copepods have a high reproductive capacity,
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 6 of 35

resulting in high population densities. The most used groups are Cyclopoida, Calanoida, and
Harpacticoida and are offered as food at different stages of life (nauplius, copepodite, and
adults) [28].
The cladocerans are predominantly from freshwater, with few marine species, ranging
from 0.2 to 3 mm. In addition to having good nutritional characteristics, they are also used
as bio-capsules for transferring enriched foods to cultivated organisms. They have a life
cycle of 1 to 2 weeks, with reproduction by parthenogenesis or sexual means. Its cultivation
is practical, being able to offer microalgae and biological yeast for food maintenance. The
most used are Daphnia and Moinas [29].
Artemia have excellent nutritional value, which can be influenced by their diet and can
be enriched with microalgae and nutritional additives, characterizing brine shrimp as bio-
capsules, as they transfer these compounds to the larvae of cultivated aquatic organisms.
Its cultivation is easy, as they are marketed as dehydrated cysts, easy to hatch and maintain,
and can be offered as live food in their various stages of life, from cysts to the nauplius,
meta-nauplius, pre-adult, and adult stages. The most commercialized and used species as
live food is Artemia franciscana [30].
Polychaetes, micro-worms, beetle larvae, insects, and mosquitoes are most used in
ornamental aquaculture, being offered from the larval to adult stages to fish and shrimp
(Table 2). They are organisms that are easy to grow and of great economic importance,
as they contribute up to 80% of the diet of some species of ornamental fish. They can be
offered directly or mixed with foods, increasing the palatability of the inert food [31].
The main obstacle to the use of live food is the high cost, compared to inert foods, as
maintenance requires a small-scale trophic strategy, sometimes requiring the cultivation of
several basis organisms of the trophic chain to maintain the organisms that will be used as
live food, as an example of the use of zooplankton, which need microalgae in their diet.
One of the alternatives is the cultivation of low trophic level organisms, as it reduces the
diversity of species used as food, in addition to facilitating the gradual weaning for feeding
with inert food, without causing undesirable results in the zootechnical indexes of the
cultivated organisms. Another way is to work with the species of high commercial value,
which can cover the costs of production and maintenance of live food [32,33].

5. Biology and Cultivation of the Main Species Cultivated in Marine and Coastal
Fish Farming
Coastal aquaculture and mariculture play an important role in the livelihoods, employ-
ment, and local economy for communities’ development in many developing countries.
They are practiced in fully or partially artificial structures, in areas adjacent to the sea,
such as land ponds along the coast and closed lagoons. Although land ponds, modern or
traditional, are found in almost all regions of the world, they are much more concentrated
in South, Southeast, and East Asia and in Latin America, Europe, and North America
for the creation of crustaceans, fish, mollusks, and, to a lesser extent, marine algae [5].
Thus, to obtain the highest potential of fish cultivation, there is need to understand the
species cultivated.
Table 3 shows the fifteen species (including the species group) most cultivated in
marine and coastal aquaculture in the year 2020, with the percentage of the total produced
worldwide in the same year [2]. Among the species described in the table, in this article, we
highlight three of them (Salmo salar, Chanos chanos, and Lates calcarifer), with two of them
being the most produced (S. salar and C. chanos, respectively), in addition to a species of
pompano of the genus Trachinotus (T. blochii), of which the annual production is 110,194 tons,
with an increasing trend [34]. Its annual production has increased from 25,000 tons to more
than 168,000 tons in a decade [35], and cobia Rachycentron canadum produced almost
50,000 tonnes in 2019 [36]. These five chosen species have their peculiarities of great
relevance to aquaculture, such as the growth in the volume produced in recent years and
consequent economic impact, being, therefore, trends in marine and coastal aquaculture, as
also shown in Table 4.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 7 of 35

Table 3. Fifteen species (including the species group) most cultivated in marine and coastal aquacul-
ture in the year 2020, with the percentage of the total produced worldwide, in the same year. Source:
FAO [2].

Production in 2020
Percentage of
Species (including Species Groups) (Thousand Tonnes, Live
Total, 2020
Weight)
Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar 2719.6 32.6
Milkfish, Chanos chanos 1167.8 14.0
Mullets nei, Mugilidae 291.2 3.5
Gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata 282.1 3.4
Large yellow croaker, Larimichthys croceus 254.1 3.0
European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax 243.9 2.9
Groupers nei, Epinephelus spp. 226.2 2.7
Coho (=Silver) salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch 221.8 2.7
Rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss 220.1 2.6
Japanese seabass, Lateolabrax japonicus 196.9 2.4
Pompano, Trachinotus ovatus 160.0 1.9
Japanese amberjack, Seriola quinqueradiata 137.1 1.6
Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus 107.4 1.3
Barramundi (Giant seaperch), Lates calcarifer 105.8 1.3
Red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus 84.3 1.0
Subtotal of 15 major species 6418.2 77.0

Table 4. The species of marine or coastal fish, highlighting their main characteristics, as covered in
this article.

Common Name Scientific Name Main Feature Source

Rapid growth, high
Cobia Rachycentron canadum market value, good Liao et al. [37]
meat quality
Tolerate wide ecological
Venkatachalam et al.
Barramundi Lates calcarifer conditions and a wide
[38], Sorphea et al. [39]
range of salinity
Marine and brackish
Milkfish Chanos chanos water fish, as well as Riede [40]
fresh water
Spawns in fresh water
Atlantic salmon Salmo salar and growth in sea Bigelow [41]
water
Rapid growth rate,
McMaster and
Golden pompano Trachinotus blochii good meat quality and
Gopakumar [34]
high market demand

In this section, we will address some of the main fish currently cultivated, highlight-
ing: in marine aquaculture, the cobia Rachycentron canadum, which has a high volume of
production in China, with a promising future; the Asian bass, Lates calcarifer, highlighting
the cultivation in Taiwan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and Australia, with its growth
and resistance to diseases being improved; the milkfish, Chanos chanos, which can be culti-
vated in ponds, in-fenced, or cages; the pompano species, of great worldwide importance;
the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, the species whose production has had the greatest ex-
pansion in recent years, where Norway and Chile are the main producers; the golden
pompano Trachinotus blochiis, which has a fast growth rate, good meat quality, and high
market demand. Table 4 shows the species of marine or coastal fish, highlighting their
main characteristics, as covered in this article. It is worth noting that the production of
live food in the larval stage will be highlighted, aiming to optimize survival and weight
gain. In addition, trends in the cultivation of freshwater, estuarine, and saltwater fish
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 8 of 35

will be detailed, such as the use of biotechnology and genetics, nutrition, technological
innovations, cultivations integration, health, and biosecurity.

5.1. Cobia, Rachycentron canadum

This fish belongs to the family Rachycentridae, order Perciformes, class Actinoptery-
gii, genus Rachycentron, scientific name Rachycentron canadum (Linnaeus, 1766), and its
common name is cobia. For this species found in the natural environment, its maximum
size was 200 cm, with a maximum weight of 68 kg. The maximum age recorded was
15 years. It is associated with coral reefs. They are oceanodromes (migrate within the
marine environment), estuarine, and marine. Their depth range goes from 0 to 1200 m, and
they live in subtropical climate. They occur in a variety of habitats, including mud, sand,
boulder bottoms, coral reefs, estuaries, etc. They feed on crabs, fish, and squids. In the
warmer months, this species spawns, and its eggs and larvae are planktonic. In addition,
they exhibit solitary behavior [42].

5.1.1. Cobia Economic Impact

The global aquaculture production of Cobia increased rapidly since 2002, reach-
ing 41,774 tonnes in 2012 [1]. In 2015, the global Cobia production was approximately
40,000 tons [43]. China is the highest producer, with 43,000 tonnes, followed by Taiwan
(2000 tonnes), Panama (1800 tonnes), Viet Nam (1700 tonnes), and Ecuador (400 tonnes) [23].
The aquacultural production of cobia in 2019 was almost 50,000 tonnes [36].

5.1.2. Cobia Farming

Currently, recirculation systems are being used, due to the availability of water. These
systems have been developed and improved in recent years. They are currently common
in North American aquaculture stations, due to the limitation of water catchment. In the
recirculation systems used in cobia hatcheries, generally the tanks are of small volume
(about 300 L). They are efficient in terms of control and precision and inefficient in terms
of large-scale production, as they are quite expensive and occupy a relatively small area,
providing low to medium productivity. In recirculation, the water must pass through a
filtering process, where a 5 ppm chlorine treatment is carried out for sterilization. Due to the
use of chlorine, which is harmful to the cultivation, one must make sure that this compound
has been completely volatilized, using water aeration for a certain period, between 24 to
72 h [44].
In Taiwan, cobia remains the most popular species for cage cultivation in the open
sea, due to its rapid growth, high market value, good meat quality, technology in mass
production of larvae, cultivation in intensive and super-intensive ponds, and formulated
species-specific foods [37].
According to the Carvalho [44], some observations must be followed during the
management of cobia cultivation, such as the constant monitoring and control of the
physical and chemical parameters of the water, with the limiting factors being the dissolved
oxygen, temperature, pH, salinity, alkalinity, and nitrogen compounds, such as ammonia
and nitrite. Debris deposited on the bottom must be siphoned daily, which compromises
the quality of the water and the good performance of the animals. From the larval to
juvenile stages, the food must meet their dietary needs, with the greatest care being the
first feeding (3rd and 4th day after hatching), where the larvae have 4 mm of total length.
In this first feeding, visual changes are observed in the digestive tract of the fish.
During the fattening phase, the fish grow very quickly, reaching 6 to 8 kg in a year,
twice as high as when growing salmon [44]. In Taiwan, cultivation is carried out in two
phases: fingerling hatchery, where nursery cages are used, and fattening, carried out in
larger cages. Additionally, in this phase, an adjustment in the density occurs: 1000 fish per
cage (2.7 fish m−3 ), until the end of cultivation and feeding twice a day (10 and 16 h). Thus,
the cultivation cycle lasts 17 to 18 months. The individuals are harvested when they reach
an average weight of 6 to 8 kg, when they are exported, or 8 to 10 kg, destined for local
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 9 of 35

markets. Fish can also be processed in specialized industries and implemented with the
HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) system [45].
Wang et al. [46] investigated four isonitrogenic and isolipidic diets, regarding the
effects of carbohydrate level (CBH) in the diet of cobia R. canadum with an initial weight
of 22.2 ± 0.27 g for 8 weeks. The authors found that CBH promoted the growth and food
utilization of fish, although it also had negative effects, such as greater lipid deposition and
higher body indexes.

Cobia Feed
Cobia is a marine fish with a carnivorous feeding habit that reaches close to 60 kg in
nature. Under cultivation conditions, this fish can reach 4 to 5 kg in 12 to 15 months. The
fast growth, efficient feed conversion, and high quality of the meat make the cobia a fish of
great interest for marine cultivations. Several successful commercial cultivations are already
established in Asia, the United States, and the Caribbean, stimulating the development of
research and the improvement of production technology [47].
According to the Carvalho [44], for cobia larviculture, it is necessary to produce phyto-
plankton (microalgae) and zooplankton (rotifers and brine shrimp), which are important
in the early stages of the animals’ lives. Several species of microalgae can be used in the
hatchery of cobia. The cultivation of these microalgae has two purposes: the cultivation of
rotifers (food) and the larviculture of fish. Cobia larviculture is usually carried out using the
“green water” technique, containing, for example, the microalgae Nannochloropsis oculata
(Ochrophyta, Eustigmatophyceae) at a density of 120,000 cells.mL−1 . Other microalgae can
also be used, such as Isochrysis galbana (Haptophyta, Coccolithophyceae) and Tetraselmis sp.
(Chlorophyta). Microalgae can be cultured in the farm’s own laboratory or obtained from
other locations.
Two species of rotifers can be used in cobia larviculture, Brachionus rotundiformis and
B. plicatilis, related to different larval sizes. Rotifers can be cultivated in two systems:
continuous and non-continuous. In the continuous system, the tank is emptied daily,
removing about 40% of the volume, with the density maintained at 400 to 500 rotifers.mL−1 .
In the non-continuous system, which is carried out over four days, about 70 % of the
volume is harvested, and 30% remain for the inoculum (new cultivation). This system
enables greater biological control and animal health [44].
Artemia are microcrustaceans, also known as brine shrimp. Artemia nauplii are used to
feed marine fish, obtained through a process of decapsulation of the cysts. The decapsulated
cysts can be used as a rich source of energy in food. The decapsulation process involves the
hydration of the cysts, removal of the shell with a sodium hypochlorite solution, washing
in running water, and maintenance in salt water with constant aeration [48]. In cobia
larviculture, two different types of nauplii are used: reduced size and high amount of
lipids (430 × 162 µm) and larger size with low amount of lipids (630 × 185 µm). For larger
nauplii, enrichment must be carried out before use. For fish, the smaller size nauplii should
be offered in the first three days of the transition phase from rotifer to brine shrimp feeding.
Then, larger nauplii, until the complete exclusion of live food [49].
In nauplii enrichment, also called bioencapsulation, important nutrients for the devel-
opment of larvae are added, using numerous products, such as algae, yeasts, protein, and
lipid concentrates, etc., separately or together [50]. Products containing high concentrations
of docosapentaenoic (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic (EPA) acids are highly recommended.
Marine fish generally lack the enzymes needed to synthesize these acids. Protein, algae,
and yeast-based products are also used [44].

5.1.3. Cobia Reproduction

When studying sperm cryopreservation and oocyte induction, Caylor et al. [51] found
that sperm motility decreases after about 60 min at room temperature, but approximately
100% can be restored by adding a few drops of theophylline 5 mM. Mature and wild
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 10 of 35

females were kept in recirculating water systems, and ovulation was induced by injection
of chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) at a concentration of 275 IU.kg−1 of body weight.
The maturation tanks are the first step in the production of juveniles. In them, females
and males are kept in highly controlled facilities, such as photoperiod, temperature, salinity,
etc. Females can produce between 300,000 and 1.9 million oocytes [52].
Zhang et al. [53] studied the initial stages of development of the cobia, R. canadum,
aiming for the large-scale production of larvae and juveniles. The authors observed that,
after three days after hatching (DAH), the larvae began to feed, and the feeding incidence
was 70%. The incidence was 100% in the case of juveniles. Food consumption of larvae and
juveniles increases with increasing body mass. Cobia larvae and juveniles were satiated in
one hour. The digestion time of larvae for rotifers and copepods was between 0.5 and 1.5 h
and 0.5 to 2 h, respectively, while that of juveniles was 1 to 3 h.

5.1.4. Cobia Farming Problems

Some diseases/pathological agents can affect the animals, causing damage during culti-
vation, such as Cryptocaryon irritans and Amyloodinium ocellatum (parasites), Streptococcus spp.
and Photobacterium spp. (bacteria), and Lymphocystis (virus) [54]. Nguyen et al. [55] ob-
served that two surface proteins, namely phosphoenolpyruvate protein phosphotransferase
(PtsA) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), showed strong reac-
tions with cobia antisera against severe infection by the bacterium Streptococcus dysgalactiae,
being promising for the development of vaccines against this pathogen.

5.1.5. Technological Obstacles in the Cultivation of Cobia

Technological obstacles that prevent the activity from expanding significantly are:
food limitation, since fishing waste is increasingly limited; water quality and excess of
nutrients during cultivation, due to the expansion of the cultures; the environmental danger,
caused by the escape of individuals to the natural environment, where it is cultivated
and diseases, which are related to the increase in density and improper management
and global supply of fish (competition with other cultivated species) [54]. The lack of
regulation in open sea aquaculture in some parts of the world, such as Taiwan, results
in the uncontrolled proliferation of marine farms. Disease outbreaks remain the greatest
threat to cobia cultivation in Taiwan, causing a significant drop in production [37].

5.2. The Asian Sea Bass, Lates calcarifer

This fish belongs to the family Latidae, order Perciformes, class Actinopterygii, genus
Lates, scientific name Lates calcarifer (Block, 1790), and its common name is barramundi.
For this species, found in the natural environment, its maximum size was 200 cm, with a
maximum weight of 60 kg. They are catadromous (migrate from fresh water to the sea).
Their depth range goes from 0 to 40 m, and they live in tropical climates [42].
According to the authors, these fish are found in coastal waters, estuaries, and lakes.
Larvae and juveniles inhabit swamps and estuaries temporarily. Older individuals inhabit
the seas. This fish has a preference for stems and submerged vegetation. They feed on fish
and crustaceans. Juveniles also feed on insects. They have high economic importance.

5.2.1. Asian Sea Bass Economic Impact

Asian sea perch, widely known as Asian seabass or barramundi (common name in the
commonwealth countries, mainly Australia) (Lates calcarifer), is the second highest cultured
marine fish in Malaysia [56]. The production of farmed seabass of five countries, including
Taiwan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and Australia, has increased from 10,000 tonnes
(70,720,000 USD) in 1991 to 30,970 tonnes (79,034,000 USD) produced in 2005 and about
95,000 tonnes in 2018, with a growth rate of 170.6% from 2006 to 2016 [57]. In 2019, the
global output of L. calcarifer rose to about 76,842 tonnes [58]. However, its economic value
after 2005 was not yet calculated.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 11 of 35

5.2.2. Asian Sea Bass Farming

Sea basses are estuarine fish with opportunistic carnivorous habits. In addition to
aquaculture, they are of great importance in commercial and sport fishing, in addition to
their high market value [59]. These fish tolerate wide ecological conditions and a wide
range of salinity, from 0 to 56 ppt, depending on the cultivation conditions, whether in
fresh, brackish, or saline waters [38,39]. Mozanzadeh et al. [60] found that intermediate
salinities (brackish water) between 6 and 12 ppt are recommended for the cultivation of
this species. These fish can be cultivated in different production systems, including cages,
land ponds, and in recirculation systems [61].
In some parts of Asia, juveniles are still collected in the wild, but the most come from
larviculture, which is now well-established. Breeders are kept in floating cages or tanks in
salt water (28 to 35 ppt). This species does not have secondary sexual characters, requiring
cannulation to detect its sex and reproductive status. Breeders feed on fishing waste or
small fish (baitfish). This diet should be supplemented with a vitamin [54].
Nhan et al. [62] evaluated the impacts of high stocking densities on the growth per-
formance, survival rate, and economic efficiency of the Asian sea bass L. calcarifer farmed
intensively in land ponds. The fish had initial average weights of 22.1 ± 1.3 g and were
stored in ponds with an area of 1000 m2 and a water depth of 2.0 m, being fed with pelleted
food containing 43 to 44% of crude protein, with densities of 6, 8, and 10 fish.m−2 . The
authors found that the growth in weight and daily weight gain of fish at a density of
6 fish.m−2 was significantly higher, compared to the density of 10 fish.m−2 . In addition,
the highest capital efficiency was also recorded in the treatment with 6 fish.m−2 .
In Australia, sea basses are stored in cages in fresh or brackish water environments, in
marine waters, or in terrestrial recirculation systems [63].
The fishing technique in the cage system is relatively simple. In the pond’s cultivation
system it is more difficult, requiring the use of nets or mechanisms for water drainage [54].
To optimize the efficiency of barramundi farms, Nor et al. [64] mention that it is neces-
sary to increase the production cycle to 1.73 times.year−1 , in order to reduce production
costs. Government should give more priority to the research and development of cheaper
feed alternatives, probiotics, and vaccines. Farmers should be aware of the costs and make
better decisions, for example, improving the feed conversion ratio (FCR) and biosecurity to
improve profitability.

Asian Sea Bass Feed Needs

Most barramundi cultivations use pelleted food, although “trashfish” is still used, as
it has a lower cost, compared to pelleted food. The feed conversion in this system generally
ranges from 4:1 to 8:1, in relation to feeding with pelleted food. Fish are also fed with
“trashfish” twice a day, in 8 to 10% of the total biomass, up to 100 g, and decreasing to 3 to
5% up to 600 g. It is also necessary to add a vitamin premix in the proportion of 2%. The
feed conversion in this system generally varies from 1.0 to 1.2:1 experimentally and 1.6 to
1.8:1 in commercial cultivation [54].
Hassan et al. [65] tested the cultivation, for 70 days, of juveniles of the Asian bass,
L. calcarifer, with an average weight of 0.2 g, varying the feeding frequency (one, two, three,
and four times a day) in the zootechnical performance of the animals and found that the
feeding frequency of three times a day had a positive effect on weight gain, survival rate,
and food utilization, while animals fed only once a day had the lowest zootechnical indexes.
Chaklader et al. [66] found that the combination of a diet replacing fishmeal (FM) by
a whole meal of Hermetia illucens larvae (HI) with a poultry by-product meal (PBM) for
barramundi allowed for the complete replacement of the meal of fish, without negative
effects on growth, also improving the gut health of fish, and may be a protein alternative
for the production of commercial food for the species.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 12 of 35

5.2.3. Asian Sea Bass Reproduction

The reproductive physiology of the species is reasonably well-understood, with the
life cycle fully closed and hatchery production of juveniles routinely achieved [67].
Research has shown that there is usually hormonal induction for spawning. Currently,
its spawning uses luteinizing hormones and synthetics. The mating ritual is characterized
when the male rubs its dorsal surface against the female genital papilla and fertilization
occurs, which is external. Spawning occurs 34 to 38 h after hormone injection, at dusk,
lasting for five consecutive nights. The eggs are 0.74 to 0.80 mm in diameter, and they are
collected with a mesh of 300 µm. Reproduction of this species in cages is possible, but only
if it has a very fine mesh, preventing the eggs from passing through the meshes [54].
According to the institution, the hatching occurs 12 to 17 h after fertilization, at 27 to
30 ◦ C. The yolk sac is absorbed during the first 24 h. The mouth and digestive tract
(organs between the esophagus and the rectum) are developed in two days. Therefore, the
beginning of feeding occurs 45 to 50 h after hatching. Barramundi larviculture is carried
out using the “green water” technique, using circular or rectangular tanks with a capacity
of 26 m3 . The microalgae Tetraselmis sp. or Nannochloropsis oculata can be used in this
system. Barramundi is intensively fed with rotifers of the species B. plicatilis from the 2nd
to the 15th day after exclusion and with Artemia sp. from the 8th day after exclusion and
onwards. Freshwater cladocerans (Daphnia and Moina) are used to supplement or replace
the brine shrimp.
Fraser et al. [68], when studying the existing deformities in larvae of barramundi
L. calcarifer, recorded three types of spinal deformities, with the most common being light
malformations of the centers. One case of lordotic/scoliotic/kyphotic (LSK) syndrome
and one gross vertebral malformation were also documented. The first spinal deformities
were observed at 20 days after hatching (DAH). The frequency of deformities increased to a
maximum of 7.7% of sampled fish at the completion of the study, at 38 DAH. The deformities
were recorded 6 days after ossification of the spine (20 DAH), implying dysfunctions in
bone metabolism.
The survival of juveniles with a total length of 10 mm is 10 to 50%. They can also be
produced extensively in ponds of 0.05 to 1 ha, lined with plastic tarpaulin. In this system,
some factors occur relatively frequently, including stratification, fertilization, and plankton
growth. The larval density is 400,000 to 900,000 larvae.ha−1 . In this system, harvesting
takes place when the fish reach 25 mm in total length (about three weeks after storage).
Then, the larvae are transferred to nursery tanks. Survival is 20%, but it is highly variable
(ranging from 0 to 90%) [54].
According to the institution, the juveniles, with total lengths of 1.0 to 2.5 cm, can be
stored in floating or fixed cages in rivers, ponds, or coastal areas or directly in fresh water.
Feed is chopped “trashfish” (4 to 6 mm) or in small pellets. In this food, vitamin premix can
be added in the proportion of 2%. This phase lasts from 30 to 45 days, when the juveniles
reach 5 to 10 cm in total length. Cannibalism among larvae is the main problem during the
nursery phase, occurring most frequently in fish up to 150 mm in total length. In order to
reduce this problem, fish should be selected by size [54].

5.2.4. Asian Sea Bass Farming Problems

Some diseases/pathological agents can affect animals, causing damage during cultiva-
tion, such as nervous necrosis virus (NNV) and lymphocysts (virus), vibriosis, bacterial
hemorrhagic septicemia, integumentary bacteriosis and Streptococcus spp. (bacteria), white
spot, chilodonelliasis and trichodyniasis (protozoa), integumentary mycoses and bran-
chiomycosis (fungi), and Argulus sp. and Lernaea sp. (copepods) [54].
Jitrakorn et al. [69] report an unexpected finding of dual infections of both Megalo-
cytivirus ISKNV and nervous ncrosis virus (NNV) in a single Asian bass, Lates calcarifer,
farm, causing approximately 50% mortality in the animals. According to the authors,
these viruses are the two main viral pathogens that affect marine fish on farms in the
Asia–Pacific region.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 13 of 35

Yu et al. [70] demonstrated that astragalus polysaccharides (APS) supplementation

at a dosage of 0.1% is the optimal level to promote the growth performance, health, and
resistance of barramundi against Vibrio harveyi, while the dosage of 0.2% exerts adverse
effects on fish.
Siddik et al. [71] observed a significant improvement in the expression of the immune
response genes found in L. calcarifer fed with symbiotic (Lactobacillus casei and garlic Allium
sativum), when compared to the control, without the inclusion of them. Overall, the
results indicate that dietary symbiotic supplementation has the potential to improve the
antioxidant response and health welfare of barramundi.

5.2.5. Technological Obstacles in the Cultivation of Asian Bass, L. calcarifer

The technological obstacles that prevent the activity from expanding significantly
are the environmental impacts, due to excess nutrients and residues during cultivation,
especially in cage fattening, resulting in diseases [54].

5.3. The Milkfish, Chanos chanos

This fish belongs to the family Chanidae, order Gonorynchiformes, class Actinoptery-
gii, genus Chanos, scientific name Chanos chanos (Forsskal, 1775), and its common name
is milkfish. They are marine and brackish water fish, as well as fresh water, being ben-
thopelagic and amphidromic [40]. Their depth ranges from 1 to 30 m [72], and they are
from tropical waters, with temperatures between 15 and 43 ◦ C [73].
The milkfish C. chanos is a tropical species known for being less tolerant of cold and
being suitable for cultivation in hot seasons of the year, since the highest mortality usually
occurs in the winter period, when cold fronts predominate, causing catastrophic damage
for the aquaculture industry of this species [74].
These fish are found in marine and coastal waters, but can also occur in estuaries and
penetrate rivers [75,76]. They occur in small to large shoals close to the coast or around
islands, such as coral reefs. Eggs and larvae are pelagic up to 2 to 3 weeks. The most
developed larvae migrate to the coast and settle in brackish coastal wetlands (mangroves
or estuaries) during the juvenile stage or occasionally enter freshwater environments. The
most developed juveniles return to the sea, where they mature sexually. Mature adults
spawn only in seawater. The larvae feed on zooplankton; juveniles and adults have
cyanobacteria, small benthic invertebrates, and even larvae and fish eggs in their diet. The
larvae can be collected in rivers, as well as in laboratories aiming for their development
(aquaculture) [77].

5.3.1. The Milkfish Economic Impact

More milkfish is being processed into value-added forms, such as smoked, dried,
marinated (brined, sweetened), fermented with rice, and canned or bottled in a variety
of styles (salmon style, sardine style, Spanish style, smoked in oil, etc.). Some Philippine
enterprises now make frozen prime slices of milkfish bellies and backs, as well as heads
and tails. Milkfish is exported in a variety of forms, including quick-frozen, dried, tinned,
smoked, and marinated. In 2002, the Philippines exported about 17.040 tonnes of milkfish
products to the EU, valued at 58,000 USD. While China’s Taiwan Province focuses on
processed and value-added goods for sale to the United States, Indonesia has increased its
export of hatchery-reared seedstock to the rest of the Asia–Pacific area [43].

5.3.2. The Milkfish Farming

In the Philippines, this species is of great importance for aquaculture, where they
were traditionally cultivated in ponds with brackish water, but eventually expanded to
fenced-in and marine cages [78]. The total annual production of this fish has exceeded
300,000 tonnes, since 1981 [79]. In the year 2015, the annual global production reached
more than 1.1 million tons, highlighting the Philippines, Indonesia, and Taiwan as the main
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 14 of 35

producers [80,81]. In 2016, the species contributed 1.188 million tonnes, representing 2% of
the total fish produced globally in aquaculture [23].
In addition to the characteristics described, this species has rapid growth, efficient use
of natural foods, herbivorous feeding habits, resistance to diseases, and tolerance to a range
of ecological factors [82].
According to the FAO [54], the fenced-in system was first introduced in the Philippines
in 1969. Due to its good acceptance, its use increased a lot from 1973 to 1983. In the
beginning, where there were few milkfish farms, the amount of natural food was high.
Currently, where there is an expansion of cultivations, the amount of natural food is low.
Therefore, the demand for this food is high. To meet this demand, commercial foods are
used, supplying the nutritional needs of fish. The stocking density of juveniles in this
system ranges from 30,000 to 35,000 specimens.ha−1 . The biggest problem in the fattening
of this species in fenced-in is the spread of diseases, causing high mortalities.
Another form of cultivation frequently used is carried out in cages, where smaller
and more restricted areas are used. They can occur in shallow water (fixed) or in deep
water (floating cages). It is commonly performed in coastal marine waters. In this type of
culture, very high stocking densities are used, from 5 to 30 fish.m3 . Densities are higher in
this system, due to the flow of water inside the cages, renewing it frequently, with a high
amount of dissolved oxygen [54].
Lee et al. [79], when comparing the operational procedures, as well as production
costs in the intensive and semi-intensive systems in the milkfish cultivation in Taiwan,
concluded that the semi-intensive or outdoor environments are profitable operations for
the production of juveniles, when compared to the intensive one.
Fishing is usually carried out when the fish reach 20 to 40 cm and around 250 to
500 g. It can be carried out through three different methods: partial, selective harvesting
only in commercial size (average weight of individuals greater than 250 g); total, complete
harvesting, carried out, for example, by completely draining the water from the pond (in
this type of harvesting, the average weight can vary from 250 to 500 g); forced, it is the
emergency fishing, regardless the size of the fish. It occurs when there is an imbalance in the
cultivation, for example, the occurrence of red tide or depletion of dissolved oxygen in the
water. The commercial food used in fenced-in and cages are of floating and semi-floating
forms, which give a visual response to the consumption of this food by the fish. In pond
cultivation, the food is pelleted, sinking in water. Due to the extensive research related to
the nutritional requirements of C. chanos, food is currently offered depending on the animal
life stage [54].

The Milkfish Feed Needs

For the production of natural food in ponds, it is necessary to make a fertilizers, carried
out through the use of organic fertilizers, such as ammonium fertilizers (NH4 )2 SO4 , nitrate
Ca(NO3 )2 , starch 46% N, urea, superphosphate Ca(H2 PO4 )2 .H2 O and dicalcium phosphate
CaHPO3 .H2 O, or inorganic substances, such as cattle, pig, or goat manure. Cottonseed,
rice bran, and other agricultural residues are also used. Thus, the algae growth rate must
exceed the fish pasture rate. Otherwise, it is necessary to make a food supplementation
with the associated microorganisms. The average depth of the ponds is 30 to 40 cm, and
the water supply is independent. The productivity can reach 800 kg.ha−1 , in a total of three
annual harvests, and can be increased to 2000 kg.ha−1 [54].
Hussain et al. [83] verified the effects of different levels of protein in the diet of
C. chanos, in relation to growth and survival during 90 days in soil ponds. The presented
results showed that fishes fed 30% of the protein-containing feed have the highest weight
gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR), average daily weight gain (ADWG), survival, and
the best feed conversion ratio (FCR), compared to the other treatments.
Sandeep et al. [84] studied the potential of fish waste hydrolysate (FWH) in the
production of phytoplankton and reduction of formulated foods in the cultivation of
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 15 of 35

C. chanos. The authors found that FWH supplementation at 40 ppm saved 50% of the food
required by the animals, without affecting growth and survival.

5.3.3. The Milkfish Reproduction

Breeding facilities demand pumping of salt water and integration with larvicultures.
The sexual maturity of this species stored in floating cages is 5 years and in tanks or
fishponds, 8 to 10 years. The production of oocytes from a given breeder of about 8 years
and an average weight of 6 kg is about 3 to 4 million. The mass production of juveniles,
as practiced in Taiwan, Indonesia, and the Philippines, occurs through natural spawning,
featuring high survival rates. Artificial induction of reproduction is not normally used.
Spawning usually takes place around midnight, but can occur during the day. The collection
of wild juveniles, directly from nature, occurs through the use of a fine mesh net, called a
“sweeper”, commonly occurring in the Philippines and Taiwan [54].
According to the FAO [54], for the larviculture of this species, the following facilities
are necessary: tanks for raising the larvae, tanks for growing rotifers (genus Brachionus)
and green microalgae (for example, algae of the genus Chlorella), and tanks for hatching
brine shrimp. After larviculture, the nursery phase begins, which varies depending on
the cultural practices of each place. Suspended nylon hapas are also used and installed in
fresh or salt water. Due to the high density of fish in this system, natural food is practically
extinct. To satisfy their high food demand, artificial foods can be used, such as rice bran,
corn, etc. For storage in the fattening phase (finishing), it is ideal to have juveniles with
5 to 8 cm, achieved when the time in the nursery phase is about 4 to 6 weeks. The fattening
phase (finishing) can be carried out in ponds, cages, or in-fenced.
In a typical production cycle, juveniles are captured in the wild or obtained in labora-
tories, measuring 2 to 3 cm, being cultivated in nursery tanks until the size of 5 to 8 cm,
with an average weight of 30 to 40 g; after that, they will be transported to fattening ponds,
fenced-in, or cages until harvesting, thus having 20 to 40 cm in length and 400 to 700 g in
weight, depending on the market [77,80].

5.3.4. The Milkfish Farming Problems

Some diseases/pathological agents can affect animals, causing damage during cul-
tivation, such as nematode infestation (nematode), anchor worm disease and Caligus
infestation (copepods), trichodynosis and Cryptobia infestation (protozoa), and scolex in-
festation (helminths) [54]. In the Philippines, Estante-Superio et al. [85] observed that the
bacterium V. harveyi is an opportunistic pathogen capable of instigating disease epizootics
in milkfish juveniles stocked at high densities. Another consequence of using high densities
is the increase in cortisol levels, which, together with other management characteristics,
such as feeding strategy and location, increase the stress of farmed animals, as observed
in milkfish mariculture by Hanke et al. [86], and require more sustainable practices in the
aquaculture of this species.

5.3.5. Technological Obstacles in the Cultivation of Milkfish, C. chanos

The technological obstacles that prevent the activity from expanding significantly are:
the low reliability of the breeders of this species, the uncontrolled supply of juveniles, and
the low market acceptance, due to the high amount of spines in the meat, being necessary
to use a technique to debone the same, and due to the expansion of aquaculture by other
species of greater commercial value, thus minimizing the production of milkfish [54].

5.4. The Atlantic Salmon, Salmo salar

This fish belongs to the family Salmonidae, subfamily Salmoninae, order Salmoni-
formes, class Actinopterygii, genus Salmo, scientific name Salmo salar (Linnaeus, 1758), and
its common name is Atlantic salmon. For this species, found in the natural environment, its
maximum size was 150 cm, with a maximum weight of 46.8 kg. They are benthopelagic
(they live close to the bottom and move away from it at night), anadromous, and from brack-
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 16 of 35

ish or marine water. Their depth range goes from 0 to 210 m, and they live in temperate
climates [42].
In the natural environment, this fish spawns in fresh water and the larvae, by absorbing
the natural reserves of the yolk sac, are ready to accept exogenous food. At this stage, these
fish remain in fresh water for 2 to 5 years, depending on the water temperature and food
supply. Before migration, juveniles undergo physiological and behavioral changes, which
prepare them for life at sea. After spending 1 to 2 years at sea, they return to their rivers,
freshwater environments, to spawn. At sea, Atlantic salmon prefer temperatures of 4 to
12 ◦ C, but can withstand short periods of time at lethal temperatures below −7 ◦ C or above
27.8 ◦ C, respectively [41]. On the market, they can be sold fresh, salted, smoked, or frozen,
and the fillet can also be used for sushi and sashimi.
In streams, they mainly feed on aquatic insects, including chironomid larvae and
nymphs, for example; in the marine environment, they mainly feed on a variety of organ-
isms, including crustaceans, amphipods, decapods, and fish [87].

5.4.1. Atlantic Salmon Economic Impact

The Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) represents, by volume, approximately 90% of the
total salmonid farming, with a world production of approximately 1,000,000 tonnes [88].
In Norway, salmon production in 2019 reached 845,000 tonnes and a value of 5 billion
euros [89]. In Chile, in 2020, salmonid production reached 1.468 million tonnes [90]. Thus,
the species has achieved the greatest expansion in recent years, with these two countries
being the main world producers.
Aquaculture of Atlantic salmon (S. salar) has become an important industry for several
countries globally and in the North Atlantic, in particular [91]. In Norway, the production
of farmed salmon started in the 1970s. The industry has since grown rapidly, resulting in
the country having the highest per capita aquaculture production in 2016 [92]. In addition
to the great importance of the Atlantic salmon industry in Norway and Chile, it is worth
mentioning Canada and the United Kingdom [93].
Salmon farming has been hailed as one of the great success stories in modern Norway.
The industry started in the late 1960s and, within 50 years, it became the most important
export industry, next to oil and gas [94]. This success can be attributed to factors such
as favourable natural conditions, increasing seafood demand, and a steady investment,
accompanied by technological development. However, after an expansive growth period
that lasted until around 2013, there has been a stagnation in the production volumes [95].
Norway exports >95% of its salmon production, with firms tending to focus on a
few markets or regions [96]. On top of that, salmon farming takes place mainly in remote
coastal communities, offering valuable employment in municipalities hard hit by the
rationalization of the traditional fisheries and processing industry [97].

5.4.2. Atlantic Salmon Farming

Cross et al. [98] found that a lower water temperature (12 ◦ C) reduced the prevalence
of S. salar maturation in recirculation systems (RAS), keeping production performance
similar to the higher temperature (14 ◦ C). However, more than 20% of salmon cultured at
12 ◦ C matured, indicating that an even lower temperature, additional manipulations to the
RAS environment, or the use of all-female stocks are needed to optimize Atlantic salmon
growth in RAS for reduced maturation.
According to the FAO [54], fish with an average weight of 40 to 120 g are transferred
to specific structures and already acclimatized to the sea (smolt). Transfers are normally
carried out in specialized transport tanks, using specific boats for this purpose. The cages
come in a variety of shapes, being square or circular and have different sizes, up to 24 m2
or 100 m in diameter, and depths from 15 to 18 m. Salmon grow best in water temperatures
between 6 to 16 ◦ C and salinities of 33 to 34 mg.L−1 of salt. The water flows must be
sufficient to eliminate waste and for oxygenation. The maximum density can be up to
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 17 of 35

20 kg.m−3 . The cultivation time in these structures can be up to 2 years, and harvesting
takes place when the salmon reach an average weight of more than 2 kg.
According to the institution, salmon fishing techniques vary greatly, depending on the
location and structures used. Usually, the fish stay three days without feeding (depuration).
The entire process must occur with minimal stress, so that a higher quality of the product
occurs. When harvesting from the cages, a net can be used, or the fish can be pumped
alive and transported to the processing plant in the shortest possible time and at low
temperatures [54].

Atlantic Salmon Feed

Wei et al. [93] used the flour of the microalgae Pavlova sp. cultivated in photobioreac-
tors in the diet of S. salar, with an average weight of 170.1 ± 23.9 g during 12 weeks, and
verified that the flour of this microalga could be a good source of protein and n-3 LC-PUFA
in the performance of this species cultivated in commercial farms.
The basis of the salmon diet consists of fishmeal and oil. Due to the high price reached
by these two compounds, it is necessary to carry out research, in order to replace these
elements, for example, using vegetable protein or other sources of oil. The diet contains high
levels of fish oil, with a feed conversion ratio close to 1:1, which is excellent for cultivation.
Many marine farms use computerized systems to conduct feeding, with mechanisms to
detect when the fish has finished feeding [54].
Hansen et al. [99], when using yeast to optimize the nutrient digestibility of Atlantic
salmon (S. salar), found that Saccharomyces cerevisiae increased the solubility of protein and
β-glucan. In addition, different yeast processing triggered different immunostimulatory
effects in this fish species.
The salmon market demands a reddish-colored meat, requiring the addition of
carotenoid pigments, which comprise a family of natural compounds, of which, more
than 600 structural variants are reported and characterized, from bacteria, algae, fungi, and
higher plants, thus raising the cost of production [54].

5.4.3. Atlantic Salmon Reproduction

In commercial cultivation, the breeders are selected from the breeding stock. These fish
are transferred to freshwater cages or tanks. The collected oocytes are cleaned, fertilized
with extruded semen (extrusion process), and disinfected, before going to the tray system,
where they hatch in this system [54].
After a certain period, the unfertilized eggs are removed, and the hatched ones are
transferred to tanks or incubators. For juveniles, carpets, mats, or stones are needed as a
“substrate”, imitating natural gravel. For the incubation of eggs and the development of
juveniles, the ideal water temperature is below 10 ◦ C. After the absorption of the yolk sac,
the juveniles go upwards in the water column, indicating the beginning of the first feeding,
which can be carried out initially in incubators, through inert (non-live) foods. Juveniles
can be grown in tanks with continuous flow or in a recirculation system. Fish can be kept
at room temperature and in a light regime. Production densities vary, depending on the
system, for example, in a super intensive cultivation, densities are high and can be greater
than 50 kg.m−3 [54].

5.4.4. Atlantic Salmon Farming Problems

Some diseases/pathological agents can affect the animals, causing damage during
cultivation, such as infectious salmon anemia, viral hemorrhagic septicemia and infectious
pancreatic necrosis (virus), bacterial kidney disease and salmon rickettsial disease (bacteria),
saprolegniasis (fungi), and amoeba in gills and freshwater protozoa (endoparasites) [54].
Hevrøy et al. [100], in a study on the depth of the infestation of the ectoparasite
Lepeophtheirus salmonis in Atlantic salmon (S. salar), concluded that this species, kept at 0 to
4 m depth in cages, developed greater infestation than at greater depths (4 to 8 and 8 to
12 m). A strategy to minimize the effects of the ectoparasite in question is to insert the
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 18 of 35

golden wrasse (Ctenolabrus rupestris) into the cultivation cages, a species that will do the
complementary delousing, but studies must be done, so that they do not escape through
the meshes of the cultivation cage net, causing, for example, genetic pollution [101].

5.4.5. Technological Obstacles in the Cultivation of Atlantic Salmon, S. salar

The technological obstacles that prevent the activity from expanding significantly are:
the drop in the sales price, due to the high expansion of the activity, causing high production,
culminating in high supply, and consequent low market prices. Another bottleneck would
be the low availability of suitable places for cultivation, with good quantity and quality of
water, for example. In Europe, the production costs are quite high. Finally, the use of food
during cultivation has an impact on world fisheries, due to the need for raw materials for its
manufacture (flour and fish oil), in addition to the high prices of the inputs currently [54].

5.5. The Golden Pompano, Trachinotus blochii

This fish belongs to the family Carangidae, order Carangiformes, class Actinopterygii,
genus Trachinotus, scientific name Trachinotus blochii (Lacépède 1801), and its common
name is Florida pompano, or golden pompano. The genus Trachinotus is composed of about
20 species. Most are shoal fish and occur mainly in coastal environments and brackish
waters (especially juveniles), although others are oceanic. They occur abundantly in shallow
waters up to 60 m deep [34].

5.5.1. The Golden Pompano Economic Impact

This fish species has high demand in local and international markets, especially in
Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. The market value and growing demand
are the main factors that contribute to the interest in the aquaculture of this fish [102].
Furthermore, juvenile production techniques have been widely performed in Southeast
Asia, along with other high-value marine fish species [103]. According to McMaster and
Gopakumar [34], among the many tropical marine fish of high commercial value that can
be farmed, the golden pompano Trachinotus blochii is one of the most outstanding, mainly
due to its rapid growth rate, good meat quality, and high market demand. Aquaculture of
this species has been successfully established in many Asia–Pacific countries, including
Taiwan and Indonesia. They can be successfully grown in ponds, tanks, and floating
cages at sea. The species is pelagic, very active, and able to acclimate to lower salinities.
Presenting strong growth, even at 10 ppt, this species is suitable for cultivation in low
salinity coastal waters, as well as in sea cages. In addition, basic hybridization efforts were
tested, selecting individuals primarily for rapid growth and early fertility. These findings
strongly demonstrate that selective crossbreeding can result in an improved variety more
adapted to agricultural environments than the wild stock.

5.5.2. The Golden Pompano Farming

The mariculture of this fish is carried out in open sea cages, brackish water cages, and in
ponds in China, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The methods
for cultivation cages in open sea have been well-established in Vietnam, and commercial
cultivation is being carried out by smallholder farmers and private companies [34].
Juveniles inhabit sandy shores and shallow sandy or muddy bays close to the river
mouths, while juveniles move along coral reefs and rocks towards the sea, in small shoals.
Adults are generally solitary, feeding mainly on sand mollusks and other invertebrates.
Concerning aquaculture, they can be weaned to inert food, such as floating or sinking
pellets and catch residue. They can tolerate a wide range of salinities, from 0 to 65 ppt.
The species prefers warm tropical waters, with a tolerance of 25 to 29 ◦ C. This species is
widely distributed in the Indian, Western, and central Pacific Oceans, with a wide and
elongated range from the east-central United States of America to southern Brazil. It is a
coastal species, rarely found in waters deeper than 33 m. This species inhabits both coastal
areas with oceanic salinities and coastal bays and lagoons (estuaries) with low salinities.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 19 of 35

The cultivation temperature range is 24 to 28 ◦ C, with an ideal temperature of 27 ◦ C. In

addition, their primary diet consists of small shrimp, crabs, and bivalves.
The golden pompano, T. blochii, is characterized by its rapid growth and tolerates a
wide range of temperatures. Because of its delicate meat and high nutritional value, it is
widely accepted for consumption, where this species is becoming increasingly popular with
consumers in China, the United States, and Canada, and its annual production has increased
from 25,000 tons to over 150,000 tonnes within a decade [104]. Globally, snubnose pompano
production reached about 0.11 million tonnes during 2014, with a major chunk from
China through net cage farming, low saline pond culture, and re-circulatory aquaculture
systems [23].
The golden pompano, T. blochii, needs to swim continuously and, therefore, needs an
energy-rich diet to support an active metabolism. Growth diets contain an approximate
analysis of 40 to 50% protein and 7 to 10% fat. The pompano spawns naturally in offshore
waters between early spring and mid-autumn, mostly from April to June. Pelagic eggs are
approximately 1mm in diameter and hatch within 24 h. The larvae feed on zooplankton
and undergo metamorphosis after 15 days. Juveniles are common in coastal waters during
the early summer [34].
The culture of this species is being widely spread in various parts of India, in cages or
in ponds close to the coast, using low-cost fish and pelleted food as the main diet [105]. This
species can be grown in cages, ponds, and fenced-in. Among all methods, cultivation in low
salinity brackish water ponds yielded good harvest after 240 days of cultivation, when the
fish reached an average weight of 450 to 500 g and a survival of 94%. In these systems, for
fishing, the preferred method is to use gillnets (entanglement nets) with selective meshes.
Mesh size targets specific-sized fish, allowing smaller fish to escape, to be captured once
they reach market size [34].

The Golden Pompano Feed Needs

Ebenezar et al. [105] cultivated the golden pompano T. blochii fed with diets contain-
ing the amino acid lysine at different concentrations and observed a high survival rate
(95–100%). Maximum weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR), and protein efficiency
ratio (PER) occurred at 2.21% dietary lysine. For Stites et al. [106], the minimum lysine
requirement is 1.67% of dry weight in food formulations, and it is recommended to meet
the nutritional needs for the growth of this species.

5.5.3. The Golden Pompano Reproduction

The reproduction of this species occurs artificially, with the administration of the
hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), at a dosage of 350 IU per kg of body
weight in males and females, in a single dose, and the release of oocytes in females can be
via a natural way or by extrusion, which is the most effective way. Spawning will usually
occur within 36 to 48 h after hormone injection. Spawning normally occurs between the
late evening and early morning hours [34].

5.5.4. The Golden Pompano Farming Problems

Maintaining adequate levels of dissolved oxygen is important for the feeding, growth,
disease resistance, and reproduction of the golden pompano T. blochii, as this species
requires large amounts of oxygen. Thus, increasing the stocking density is an effective way
to improve the production volume, requiring, for this, a greater supply of this gas [107].
Some diseases/pathological agents can affect animals, causing damage during cul-
tivation, such as ectoparasite (white spot, marine ich) and white spot disease (protozoa),
ectoparasite (gill bacterium) and vibriosis (bacteria), ectoparasite (marine velvet) (dinoflag-
ellates), ectoparasite (flukes) and ectoparasite (monogenean worms), cardiac myxosporid-
iosis (myxosporidian protozoan), and parasitic dermatitis (sea lice) [34].
Ransangan et al. [102] reported the first molecular detection of Betanodavirus in T. blochii
juveniles grown in cages offshore in Langkawi, Malaysia. The virus caused the fish finger-
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 20 of 35

lings to exhibit abnormal swimming behavior, dark skin coloration, and loss of appetite,
prior to mass mortality. Histopathological examination revealed acute cell vacuolation in
both the brain and retina tissues of the affected fingerlings.

5.5.5. Technological Obstacles and Future Perspectives in the Cultivation of Golden

Pompano, T. blochii
Temperature tolerance is probably the main environmental constraint for the natural
range of this species. The lowest temperature tolerance is 12 ◦ C, at which fish are inactive
and are at risk of mortality. The upper temperature tolerance is 33 ◦ C, and if left at that
temperature for more than a few days, mortalities will occur. In addition, the supply of
energy-rich diets can be a factor that raises the cost of production, especially nowadays.
Another obstacle is the possibility of the interruption of public electricity, which is a serious
risk in some places, because high-density ponds require constant supplemental aeration,
usually provided by electric pumps. Finally, artificial chemicals, especially the pesticides
used to control mosquitoes, can have direct and indirect negative effects on the success of a
cultivation business of this species [34].

5.6. Other Important Species

While various species are cultured in inland waters using various methods, freshwater
finfish aquaculture and shrimp aquaculture, based on brackish water, are two major forms
of fish farming in Asian countries. Various types of carp, tilapia, and catfish are the major
species produced in the former, whereas whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) are becoming
the second-most dominant in the world, after the black tiger prawn [108].
Due to the importance of the cultivation of these fish in Asia, including the imposing
China, we will briefly address these three species (tilapia, catfish, and carp), which are of
relevant importance for aquaculture in this region, as described below.

5.6.1. Tilapia Culture

Tilapia are omnivorous, rustic fish that easily adapt to confinement in intensive farm-
ing systems, tolerating low levels of oxygen and high concentrations of ammonia [109].
Such characteristics also led them to be commercially cultivated in brackish or salty
waters [110–112], bringing economic, social, and environmental earnings. Among the
tilapia species, the Nile tilapia, the Thai variety, is the most cultivated strain in Brazil [112].
Native from several African countries, the Nile tilapia or Nilotic tilapia is the most
cultivated species of tilapia worldwide. This species stands out from the others for its faster
growth and later reproduction, allowing it to reach a bigger size before the first sexual
maturation. In addition, it has a high prolificity, which makes it possible to produce large
amounts of fingerlings. The Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus seems to have a great ability
to filter plankton particles, and, when cultivated in green water fishponds, this species
generally outperforms other tilapia species in growth and feed conversion [113].
Araujo et al. [114] evaluated the effect of stocking density on the zootechnical perfor-
mance of Nile tilapia O. niloticus cultivated in circular and quadrangular cages and found
a better performance in the treatment in which circular cages were used at a density of
100 fish.m−3 . In addition, the net revenue per kilo of produced fish was also higher in the
circular cages at the lowest studied density.
Tilapia tolerate low concentrations of dissolved oxygen in water. Despite the tremen-
dous ability of tilapia to survive a few hours under anoxia, when they are often exposed
to low concentrations of dissolved oxygen, they are more susceptible to disease and have
reduced growth. Many species of tilapia are euryhaline, that is, they are able to adapt
to different salinity conditions. Among the main cultivated species, Mozambique tilapia
(O. mossambicus) and Zanzibar tilapia (O. eurolepus hornorum) are the ones with the highest
tolerance to salinity. Both O. mossambicus and O. eurolepus hornorum are able to reproduce
at a salinity of 32 ppt. O. mossambicus breeds, even in waters with 49 ppt. However, the
maximum production of post-larvae occurs at 9 ppt, which is three times higher than the
 J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 21 of 35

production of post-larvae in fresh water, that is, in low salinity. Although not as euryhaline
as O. mossambicus and O. eurolepus hornorum, the blue tilapia (O. aureus) and Nile tilapia
(O. niloticus) can be acclimatized in salt water. Nile tilapia breeds normally in salinity up to
15 ppt, and its growth in water with salinity of 16 to 18 ppt is compatible with that observed
in fresh water [113]
Figure 1 shows a female red tilapia, Oreochomis sp., protecting the offspring (fertilized
eggs incubated in the mouth) during reproduction in masonry tanks at the Fish Farming
Station of the Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Ceará–IFCE,
Campus Aracati, east coast of Ceará State, Brazil, which has excellent environmental
conditions for cultivation, mainly due to the hot climate, practically throughout the year.
The red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) is highly in demand, due to many factors, such as its high
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 flesh quality, main source of protein, and its attractive color, which makes the fish worth 22 of 3
the high price [115].

Figure1.1.Female
Figure Femaleredred tilapia,
tilapia, Oreochomis
Oreochomis sp., protecting
sp., protecting the offspring
the offspring (fertilized
(fertilized eggs incubated
eggs incubated in the in th
mouth) during reproduction in masonry tanks at the Fish Farming Station of the
mouth) during reproduction in masonry tanks at the Fish Farming Station of the Federal Institute of Federal Institut
of Education,
Education, Science
Science and Technology
and Technology of Ceará–IFCE,
of Ceará–IFCE, Campus
Campus Aracati, East Aracati, East State,
coast of Ceará coast Brazil.
of Ceará State
Brazil.
5.6.2. Catfish Culture
The
5.6.2. channel
Catfish catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) was introduced into China in 1984 and has be-
Culture
come an important species farmed in nearly 20 provinces in China. According to production
The channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) was introduced into China in 1984 and ha
estimates, the annual output of farmed channel catfish in China was about 220,000 tonnes
become
in an important
2009 [116]. The channelspecies farmed
catfish are in widely
the most nearlycultured
20 provinces inChina,
catfish in China.andAccording
they are to pro
duction estimates, the annual output of farmed channel catfish in China
important food sources for the Chinese people [117]. The consumption of channel catfish was about 220,00
tonnes
has in 2009
expanded [116].
several Thetoo,
times, channel catfish
especially are theofmost
southwest China,widely cultured
where eating catfish
scaleless fishin China
anda they
was are important
traditional consumption food sources
habits [118].for the Chinese people [117]. The consumption o
In recent
channel years,
catfish haschannel
expanded catfish have times,
several playedtoo,
an essential rolesouthwest
especially in specialtyoffreshwater
China, where eat
fish
ingaquaculture
scaleless fishin was
China, due to the wide
a traditional range of suitable
consumption farming areas, fast growth,
habits [118].
In recent years, channel catfish have played an essential role in specialty freshwate
fish aquaculture in China, due to the wide range of suitable farming areas, fast growth
large harvest size, and high quality [119]. With the development of biology, ecology
breeding, and farming technology, channel catfish have been cultured on a large scale
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 22 of 35

large harvest size, and high quality [119]. With the development of biology, ecology,
breeding, and farming technology, channel catfish have been cultured on a large scale,
becoming one of the top aquatic products. The rapid growth of channel catfish aquaculture
has prompted a complete industrial chain, including seed supply, table fish production,
processing, and export [120]. Due to its wide adaptability, miscellaneous food habits, strong
disease resistance, fast growth, high yield, and tender meat, the scale of aquaculture has
expanded rapidly, and the degree of intensification has been continuously improved [121].
African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, is a freshwater fish that widely cultivated in Indone-
sia. The average production increased by 15.84% during the 2015–2019 period. In 2019,
Indonesian catfish production reached 1.2 million tonnes from the production targeted at
1.7 tons. Catfish production in 2030 is projected to increase by 100% [122].

5.6.3. Carp Culture

Cyprinidae is a major source of animal protein in many Asian and eastern Europe
countries and plays an important role in aquaculture and recreational fishery [123]. Com-
mon carp (Cyprinus carpio) is one of the most important Cyprinidae fish in the world [124],
it is one of the most farmed fish in pond aquaculture in Asian and eastern Europe, and
it is the third-most farmed fish of aquaculture production, with the seventh largest mar-
ket value [123,125]. In addition to the broadly distributed wild populations, dozens of
distinctive domestic strains were developed worldwide during its lengthy aquaculture
history. Those variants, such as the Songpu carp, Jian carp, Purse Red Carp, German mirror
carp, Majalayan, Yamoto, Galician, Dor-70, etc., exhibit obvious morphological variability
and/or particular adaptability within this species [126].
Common carp (C. carpio) is an omnivorous species that feeds on aquatic insects,
oligochaetes, mollusks, detritus, seeds, and phytoplankton [127]. Phytoplankton and
zooplankton are important components of the digestive system contents [128].
In 2020, crucian carp production in China was 2.75 million tons, accounting for 8.9% of
the total freshwater aquaculture production in China. Grass carp are a commonly cultured
fish distributed in more than 40 countries worldwide [129]. Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon
idella) is one of the most frequently farmed warm-water species in China, due to its ease
of domestication and acceptance in the marketplace [130]. Grass carp is one of the main
cultured freshwater species in China, with an annual production of over 5.8 million tons,
which is also the largest production of fish in the world’s aquaculture [131].

6. Sustainability in Marine and Coastal Fish Farming

To increase the production of aquatic organisms, it is necessary to raise the stocking
density in the cultivation facilities. Cultivation at high densities can cause negative en-
vironmental repercussions, such as chemical and biological pollution, disease outbreaks,
unsustainable feeding, and competition for coastal area. [107], and may also compromise
the environment, to a certain extent.
Jiang et al. [132] developed a food-energy-water-carbon (FEWC) sustainability index,
from 0 to 100, to assess the global sustainability of aquaculture among countries. The results
indicate that the overall sustainability of global aquaculture is low (average score = 26), with
none achieving a high sustainability score (75–100) and almost all practicing aquaculture in
a relatively low, sustainable way (0–50). Considering the sub-sustainability at a sector level,
80% of countries had at least two sectors among the FEWC falling into the low sustainable
zone (score less than 25). China led all countries by contributing to more than half of
global aquaculture water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, followed by India
and Indonesia.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 23 of 35

6.1. Classical Methods to Have Fish Farming More Sustainable

Among the most sustainable practices in fish farming, we can highlight the use of moderate
densities, feeding strategy, and location, as verified through the level of cortisol in the fish, an
indicative factor of stress in farmed animals, observed, for example, by Hanke et al. [86].
Kumaran et al. [133] observed favorable technical indicators (fish survival, feed con-
version, growth rate, and productivity), economic parameters (cost-benefit ratio, payback
period, and internal rate of return), and indicators of livelihood security in the cultivation
of barramudi L. calcarifer, when cultivated in the three-phase system in India, comprising
larviculture, pre-growing, and final grow-out in cages, thus showing that this system is
technically and economically viable, socially acceptable, and, therefore, sustainable.
Calleja et al. [134] found a high potential for marine aquaculture, specifically for
large and medium-sized enterprises. Three out of each five species studied showed high
suitability in most study sites (central and northern Pacific coasts of Costa Rica), and the
other two species showed promising results in the Gulf of Nicoya. At a regional scale, the
Pacific coast of Costa Rica presents a high potential for fish aquaculture, being a promising
development medium for coastal communities, as long as it is environmentally sustainable
and compatible with other coastal activities, such as tourism.

IMTA
Another point to comment on is the discharge of effluents from aquaculture, mostly
obtained through the foods used in cultivations, which can greatly affect the environment, if
not treated correctly. Based on this notion, the IMTA (integrated multi-trophic aquaculture)
concept was developed, which applies a simplified food web structure to a farming system
of fed species, such as fish and shrimp, in conjunction with extractive organisms, such as
mollusks and seaweed, which suck up particles and nutrients from the environment [135].
On this point, when designing an effluent treatment unit, such as a recirculation system
(RAS) and the use of macrophytes or adsorbents, fish farmers must consider a variety of
factors. Through appropriate treatment methods, the objective is to reduce environmental
pollution [136]. A greater input, mainly of nitrogen and phosphorus, in aquatic ecosys-
tems will be evidenced in eutrophic environments, which means an increase in primary
production in water bodies [136].
Current RAS knowledge and technology make these systems viable and economical
only for the production of high-value species at the moment, but other aquatic species
may become sustainable with alternative choices, such as aquaponics. Many present and
future advancements in renewable energy production will lower RAS operating costs.
To lower RAS costs, aquaculture producers, scientists, and engineers must collaborate
to properly design and constantly improve every component of RAS. Through research
and field tests, greater information about RAS technology is gathered, as well as a better
understanding of the interplay between its numerous components. RAS technology will
continue to alter and modernize the aquaculture sector, including the local production in
or near metropolitan areas, as well as in locations and nations with limited water resources,
where more traditional aquaculture systems will be implemented [137].
The wastewater from the cultivation tanks of the most diverse cultivated marine
species, rich in nutrients, can be used, for example, for the cultivation of marine macroalgae,
which shows the cultivation of the red macroalgae Calliblepharis jubata in an external
environment (outdoor) (Figure 2), using a prototype cultivation tank developed by the
company Lusalgae Ltd., located in Figueira da Foz, Coimbra, Portugal. This macroalgae,
in addition to the environmental quality, due to the consumption of excess nutrients from
fish farming, with the increase in biomass, can be used for the extraction of carrageenan
(phycocolloid), of great importance for the world food industry. In that figure, the culture
medium was estuarine seawater (29 to 34 ppt) obtained from the Mondego River estuary, in
the same locality, without addition of nutrients. The culture tank had a capacity of 1000 L,
containing 800 L of mechanically-filtered estuary water.
J.J.Mar.
Mar.Sci.
Sci.Eng. 2022,10,
Eng.2022, 10,1598
1598 24 of
25 of 35
36

Figure2.2.Cultivation
Figure Cultivationofofthe
themarine
marine macroalgae
macroalgae Calliblepharis
Calliblepharis jubata
jubata in aninexternal
an external environment
environment (out-
(outdoor).
door).
6.2. Technological Evolution in Fish Farming
6.2. Technological
Industry 4.0 Evolution
is associatedin Fish
withFarming
engineering and computer science knowledge, cou-
Industry
pled with 4.0 is associated
multisensory schemeswith engineering systems
for aquaculture and computer science
associated with knowledge, cou-
online servers
pled with
and/or multisensory
workstations withschemes
the mostfor aquaculture
appropriate systems
software associated
to manage andwith
controlonline servers
the system,
thereby contributing to
and/or workstations improved
with the most aquaculture
appropriate productivity
software toand efficiency,
manage and while
controllowering
the sys-
the
tem,overall costs
thereby [138]. Aquaculture
contributing 4.0 technologies
to improved aquaculture are productivity
a long-term solution for increasing
and efficiency, while
production
lowering the (quantity and quality),
overall costs while decreasing
[138]. Aquaculture expensesare
4.0 technologies and pollution in
a long-term aquacul-
solution for
ture [139]. production
increasing Because aquaculture
(quantity and canquality),
be offshorewhileordecreasing
onshore, abiotic
expenses and andbiotic factors
pollution in
influence
aquaculture the [139].
aquaculture
Because system, which can
aquaculture has be
a high influence
offshore on aquaculture
or onshore, abiotic and productivity.
biotic fac-
The
tors4.0 technologies
influence and methods
the aquaculture must
system, be developed
which to deal with
has a high influence the environmental
on aquaculture produc-
demand from the aquaculture location and species cultivated [140].
tivity. The 4.0 technologies and methods must be developed to deal with the environmen-
Numerous
tal demand fromtechnologies
the aquacultureare now being and
location usedspecies
in different domains
cultivated that can be included
[140].
in aquaculture
Numerous 4.0: recirculationare
technologies aquaculture
now beingsystems
used in(RAS), smart
different aquacultures
domains that can(offshore
be in-
and onshore),
cluded and real-time
in aquaculture water qualityaquaculture
4.0: recirculation [138]. systems (RAS), smart aquacultures
Aquaculture
(offshore 4.0 programs
and onshore), providewater
and real-time farmers with real-time
quality [138]. monitoring of water quality
and aquaculture
Aquaculture 4.0 programs provide farmers with real-time amount
conditions. These systems can provide a large monitoring of information
of water qual-at
intervals of seconds or minutes, allowing for the more accurate planning
ity and aquaculture conditions. These systems can provide a large amount of information of aquaculture
activities andofthe
at intervals possibility
seconds of prompting
or minutes, alarms,
allowing in case
for the moreofaccurate
unsafe water conditions/quality
planning of aquaculture
or
activities and the possibility of prompting alarms, in case of unsafe watercages
weather alerts (e.g., allowing the offshore systems to descend the fish to deep sea
conditions/qual-
weight, reducing the negative effects of sea waves and bad weather
ity or weather alerts (e.g., allowing the offshore systems to descend the fish cages to deep in the aquaculture
system).
sea weight, Additionally,
reducing the the creationeffects
negative of a comprehensive
of sea waves and database will aid
bad weather in precise
in the and
aquaculture
specialised research to improve the efficiency of aquaculture over
system). Additionally, the creation of a comprehensive database will aid in precise and the medium- and long-
term, minimising risks and elevating fish farming productivity.
specialised research to improve the efficiency of aquaculture over the medium- and long-
One of the key benefits of aquaculture 4.0 is the remote control and viewing of the RTD
term, minimising risks and elevating fish farming productivity.
on a cloud-based platform, particularly in marine farms, where cages cannot always be
One of the key benefits of aquaculture 4.0 is the remote control and viewing of the
entered quickly and at the desired moment. Onshore fish farmers applaud the cloud-based
RTD on a cloud-based platform, particularly in marine farms, where cages cannot always
system of onshore aquaculture characteristics, which can be accessible from anywhere [138].
be entered quickly and at the desired moment. Onshore fish farmers applaud the cloud-
Thus, the evolution of the fish farm passes for an adaptation to IMTA protocol to reduce
based system of onshore aquaculture characteristics, which can be accessible from any-
wastes in the aquatic systems.
where [138]. Thus, the evolution of the fish farm passes for an adaptation to IMTA proto-
Offshore aquaculture is still a new business that needs to include additional technology,
col to reduce wastes in the aquatic systems.
such as artificial intelligence and augmented reality, that can improve and automate nu-
Offshore aquaculture is still a new business that needs to include additional technol-
merous activities remotely, such as feeding, sampling, monitoring, and surveillance. More
ogy, such as artificial intelligence and augmented reality, that can improve and automate
study on the implications and repercussions of offshore aquaculture on seafood security
numerous activities remotely, such as feeding, sampling, monitoring, and surveillance.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 25 of 35

and marine habitats, as well as the social dimensions and effects of offshore aquaculture,
is required.

6.3. Feed and Nutrition in Fish Farming

Rising fish feed prices, as well as the environmental consequences of over-harvesting
forage fish for feed and fish oil, have led to a rise in the rearing of herbivorous fish (carp
and tilapia) and omnivorous fish (barramundi), which use significantly less fishmeal to
generate protein. Furthermore, antibiotics or pesticides used on farmed fish can have an
impact on other marine species or human health. These nutrients and pollutants fall to the
ocean floor, where they may have an influence on the biodiversity. Meanwhile, research to
discover alternatives to fishmeal feed or methods to make it more sustainable is continuing.
Thus, finding the finest fish feed formulae also includes attempting to attain the lowest
feed conversion ratio—the amount of feed supplied, in relation to the weight acquired by
the fish [141].
The production of feed based on new ingredients is important, due to the fact that
raw materials for feed increase the price and sustainability; therefore, there is an increased
demand to exploit more sustainable and economic raw source for feeds. At this moment,
vegetable- (non-competing vegetables for animal feed or human food) and insect-based
feeds can be an economic and efficient alternatives to the traditional feeds [142]. Thus,
the exploitation of microalgae, macroalgae, bacteria, yeast, and insects can substitute for
the actual forage fish, particularly in high-value species, such as salmonids, which will
be critical for fed aquaculture sustainability [142]. Furthermore, nutrition is a vital player
in fish farming economy, since feed accounts for almost half of the variable production
cost. In recent years, fish nutrition has evolved substantially with the development of new,
balanced commercial diets that support optimal fish growth and health. The creation of
novel species-specific diet formulas helps the aquaculture sector expand to meet the rising
demand for economical, safe, high-quality fish and seafood [143].
Other aquaculture problem is overfeeding, which wastes valuable feed. Water con-
tamination, low dissolved oxygen levels, higher biological oxygen demand, and increased
bacterial loads are other consequences. Fish should typically be fed simply the quantity
of feed that they can ingest fast (in less than 5 to 10 min). A decent general rule of thumb
is to give the fish around 80% of what they want to consume (satiation). In this method,
you feed, for one day, as much as the fish will ingest on a regular basis, possibly twice a
month [143]. Thus, the new feed needs to have higher nutritional values.
Due to the antibiotics and pharmaceuticals restriction used in the fish cultivation. The
industry’s future development is heavily reliant on the sustainable use of natural resources.
Nutraceuticals are being used in aquaculture to improve disease resistance, growth per-
formance, food conversion, and product safety for human consumption. Probiotics boost
growth and feed conversion, enhance health, promote disease resistance, reduce stress
sensitivity, and boost overall vigor. Currently, the majority of nutraceuticals come from
terrestrial sources, rather than fish. Host-associated (autochthonous) nutraceuticals, on the
other hand, are expected to be more durable in the gastrointestinal system of fish and, as a
result, may have longer-lasting benefits on the host. Nutraceuticals candidates are often
evaluated in vitro; however, the transition to in vivo testing is frequently difficult [144]
Although the administration of adequate doses of immunostimulants or immunomod-
ulatory agents promotes an increase in resistance to different diseases and improves the
animals’ health statuses, some studies demonstrate that the administration of an optimal
dose of an immunostimulant is extremely important to obtain an effective response. These
effects were proven in the cultivation of Asia seabass (Lates calcarifer), and the Kappaphycus
alvarezii (Rhodophyta) addition showed excellent immunostimulatory activity, constituting
a good immunostimulant/immunomodulating agent in the fish aquaculture field, although
more trials are needed [145].
The use of natural substances capable of immunomodulating the fish reaction to stress
factors, combined with good management of cultivation, emerges as a promising tool for
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 26 of 35

aquaculture, as it promotes action against the negative effects, reducing mortality during
the production process of these organisms.

6.4. Biosecurity in Fish Farming

According to FAO, biosecurity is a comprehensive and integrated strategy that en-
compasses both the policy and regulatory frameworks aimed at analysing and managing
relevant hazards to human, animal, and plant life and health, as well as the associated envi-
ronmental problems. It is a comprehensive concept that addresses food safety, zoonoses,
the introduction and management of animal and plant illnesses, and invasive alien species.
It also addresses the introduction and dissemination of live modified organisms and their
by-products [146]. Failure to apply biosecurity can result in disease outbreaks, which, as
previously said, can reduce farm output, pose hazards to human health, give fish a terrible
flavour and look, and obstruct farm access to markets. All of this, of course, reduces a
farmer’s cash return. Globalization, for example, has increased the risk of disease spread,
due to the increased volume, diversity, and social-economical relevance of aquatic animal
trafficking. Several stages must be performed, in order to build a successful biosecurity
plan. These processes are as follows: hazard identification and prioritisation; risk-impact
assessment; identification, mitigation, management, and remediation of critical the control
points through which diseases may enter or leave the epidemiological unit; development
of a contingency plan if a disease is discovered in the unit through disease surveillance,
monitoring, and determination of disease status or freedom in the epidemiological unit;
and periodic audition of procedures. Veterinarians test these procedures, and government
veterinary authorities should evaluate and approve them [147].
Aquaculture has been demonstrated to have the potential to contribute to socially
beneficial global food production. However, in order to address the expanding global food
security issues, the aquaculture blue revolution must be accelerated, but corrective tech-
niques to mitigate its negative repercussions must also be developed. While contributing
to global food production and boosting per capita animal protein intake, aquaculture has
depleted resources that sustain regional and global food security in some circumstances.
Indeed, certain aquaculture methods are viewed as a danger to food security [148].
Most aquaculture laws and certification programs are geared toward individual farms.
Even if everyone follows the rules, having a large number of producers in the same location
might have a cumulative environmental impact, such as water pollution or fish infections.
Spatial planning and zoning can help to guarantee that aquaculture activities stay within
the carrying capacity of the surrounding environment, while also reducing disputes over
resource usage. For example, Norway’s zoning restrictions guarantee that salmon farmers
are not unduly concentrated in one location, thus decreasing disease risk and helping to
manage environmental repercussions.
Many fishponds in China, Thailand, and Vietnam have been converted from rice fields,
a practice that China has since prohibited, owing to national food security concerns. More
crucially, it represents a change from producing a main food crop for local populations to
producing a commodity for the export market, and so food security is a major concern for
some small farmers, who have converted good rice fields into fish farms [149].
According to Beveridge et al. [150], the contribution of aquaculture to food security is
dependent not only on where it happens, but also on culture species, product price, and
fish size—all of which impact availability and usage by poor customers. Farmers can be
incentivized to conduct more sustainable aquaculture through a range of governmental
and commercial programs. Thailand’s government, for example, has offered free training,
water supply, and wastewater treatment to shrimp farmers working lawfully in aquaculture
zones. The government has also offered low-interest loans and tax breaks to small-scale
farmers, assisting them in adopting superior technology that has enhanced production
and decreased the need to clear additional land [151]. Thus, to inspire farmworkers to
execute biosecurity measures, they should be instructed on biosecurity by reputable and
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 27 of 35

credible sources, such as veterinarians, so that they understand the benefits of implementing
biosecurity measures, as well as the costs of not implementing them.
A biosecurity strategy must be evaluated and updated on a regular basis to reflect the
changes in internal infrastructure, production, and external exposure, as well as regulations.
The most effective strategy to establish robust biosecurity at an aquaculture plant is to
create a documented biosecurity plan, based on risk assessment, and utilise audits to
determine how well the plan meets the risks and hazards present. The grading method
will be critical in determining the relative relevance of the many elements and activities
included in the plan, both individually and as part of a biosecurity farm programs. A
biosecurity strategy will not be effective unless it is adequately taught and adopted by
farm employees, as a routine operating procedure. Biosecurity cannot be cost-effective
unless farmers collaborate transparently at the regional, national, and international levels.
Transparent reporting of critical data and information exchange on the area health status,
particularly the prevalence of infectious illnesses and increasing mortality occurrences, is
critical. Transparent collaboration among stakeholders is the only way for the industry to
effectively prevent and control disease outbreaks [152].

6.5. Fish Genetics on Farming

Appearance factors in fish, or those exterior body qualities that impact consumer
acceptability at the moment of sale, have risen to prominence in commercial fish farming,
as culture success is strongly tied to control of these traits. Body form and skin pigmentation
are the two most important physical characteristics. An examination of the genetic basis
of these qualities in various fish finds considerable genetic diversity among populations,
indicating the possibility of genetic improvement. Work on determining the minor or main
genes driving commercial fish aesthetic attributes is growing, with significant success in
model fish, in terms of discovering genes that regulate body form and skin colors [153].
As a result, in order to meet the current market expectations and maximize profitability,
manufacturers are being obliged to regulate outward features, particularly body form and
skin color, more intensely on an industrial scale. In commercial fish, such as common carp,
tilapia, sea bream, and salmonids, this genetic strategy is supplemented with previous
progress, based solely on the breeding values estimated with phenotypic and genealogical
information or classical genetics, which has enabled the development of new strains, for
example [153,154].
This is not a simple operation, however, because body form and skin color in fish are
complicated features influenced by a variety of hereditary and environmental variables.
Thus, development in this subject will be dependent, in part, on unravelling the underlying
genetics of these traits, in order to use current selection procedures, such as marker-assisted
selection, based on molecular data, in the future [153].
This type of selection approach has resulted in new fish populations with greater
market involvement, contributing to the better profitability of fish cultures. Because of
the sophistication of the market in many parts of the world, this tendency is projected to
continue in the coming years. As a result, there is interest in fish selection to ensure visually
pleasing species, such as tilapia, rainbow trout, common carp, gilthead sea bream, and sea
bass [153].
To address this challenge, however, fish producers must adapt and connect their
selective breeding objectives with market expectations. One older and antique approach
that might be used to attain this goal is the finding of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) or genes
that underpin body form and skin color, where continuous variation of the various qualities
that comprise these traits is typically found. This knowledge might be utilized to conduct
marker-assisted selection, which is based on molecular markers that are strongly related to
QTLs that affect several appearance features of economic relevance. This technique still
is widely applied in various countries for the rainbow trout, common carp, gilthead sea
bream, and sea bass farming [153].
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 28 of 35

However, nowadays, the trend is in selective breeding using genomic selection, which
has an enormous potential to increase aquaculture efficiency and minimize its environ-
mental footprint [155]. This genomic selection is based on enhanced genomic tools during
the last decade. Thus, these genomic tools are extremely useful for sustainable genetic
improvement. Nowadays, these tools have low cost and ease of use, meaning that they
can now be used at all stages of the domestication and genetic improvement processes,
from informing the selection of base populations to advanced genomic selection in closed
commercial breeding nuclei [155,156]. With the high interest in this genetic technology,
equipment companies are interested in developing equipment for the fish farming. Thus,
R&D and fishery-related laboratories can sequence a target fish species’ genome, thus elim-
inating the need for the coordinated effort and financing that resulted in the first farmed
animal species’ reference genome assemblies (for example, the QTLs method) [155]. In this
case, the most advanced fish farming species is the S. salar (Atlantic Salmon) [157].
Furthermore, genomics technologies are useful for addressing the species-specific
breeding and production difficulties associated with the very diversified biology of aqua-
culture species. The introduction of well-managed selective breeding programs for aqua-
culture, based on pedigree recording and routine trait assessments, has resulted in the
increased output of various species (QTLs method). This previous work, which can be
upgraded with these new genomics technologies, can drive fish farming to a new a level of
aquaculture on the safety, economic, and efficiency levels [155].
In conclusion, biotechnological developments have the potential to overcome produc-
tivity constraints in aquaculture if the all the work done is coupled with new technologies
and not started from ground zero. These advancements include the use of genome editing
technologies to make targeted changes to aquaculture species’ genomes, thus resulting
in improved health and performance, the use of reproductive biotechnologies, such as
surrogate broodstock, to accelerate genetic gain, and combinations of both approaches [155].

6.6. Dangers Nowadays in Fish Farming

Finally, Mahamud et al. [158], in their review article, discussed the factors associated
with the introduction of macro and microplastics (MPs) in aquaculture via fishmeal obtained
from animals caught in natural environment that can accumulate these materials. There
are great consequences of MPs on cultivation ponds, fish physiology, and consumer health.
The authors recommend taking the necessary care to improve the PM screening process
during fish food production and focusing on further studies to elucidate the impacts of
MPs on sustainable aquaculture production.
Because there are several international and national aquaculture certification systems,
the FAO created technical criteria for aquaculture certification, as well as an evaluation
methodology. However, although many big fish farms are obliged to do environmental im-
pact studies and obtain certifications, small farms, many of which are unsustainable, are not.
Many nations have lax regulations managing responsible aquaculture development [141].

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives on the Main Species Cultivated in Marine and
Coastal Fish Farming
Breeding technology advancements, disease management, feeds and nutrition, and
low-impact production techniques are all interconnected areas where science may supple-
ment traditional wisdom to increase efficiency.

7.1. Cobia
Future perspectives for expanding the cultivation of the cobia R. canadum are: the
improvement of the nursery stage and adaptation of juveniles to lower salinities, thus
allowing for the cultivation of this species in various environments. Thus, the future
of the cultivation is bright, as it has a good growth rate and excellent meat quality [54].
At present, research on the development of vaccines against major bacterial pathogens
(Photobacterium damsela subsp. piscicida, Vibrio alginolyticus, and Streptococcus sp.) are
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 29 of 35

undergoing. Another alternative approach to this problem is the use of immunostimulants

(e.g., h-glucan, levamisole, etc.) to enhance the nonspecific immunity of fish to various
diseases [37]. Still, according to the authors, the use of automation, in terms of the feeding,
sorting, harvesting, and washing of the cultivation structures, still needs to be developed,
as these activities are highly necessary for the use of manpower, especially in the fattening
cages in the open sea.

7.2. Asian Sea Bass

For Asian sea bass, L. calcarifers, the future prospects for expanding the activity are:
the implementation of genetic improvement programs, mainly related to growth (higher
growth rate) and disease resistance. Studies of environmental impacts are also necessary,
mainly in cage cultivation and the improvement in the commercialization of this product,
with greater emphasis on by-products (added value) [54]. Given the wide range of produc-
tion environments under which they can be cultivated, it is important to adopt selective
breeding programs to optimize growth rates, considering the impact of the genotypic
interactions (GxE) in these environments [61].

7.3. Milkfish
The future perspectives for the expansion of the cultivation of milkfish C. chanos are:
the use of new production technologies, through the implementation of more efficient
systems, aiming to increase the productivity and the supply of juveniles. It is also necessary
to use by-products (added value) and to open new markets for the commercialization of
this species [54].

7.4. Atlantic Salmon

Still, according to FAO, for Atlantic salmon, S. salar, the future perspectives for the
expansion of the activity are: carrying out research related to the reduction of environmental
pollution caused by activity, due to the excess of nutrients and use of chemical products, in
addition to the danger caused by the escape of specimens to the environment, as well as in
the resistance to several diseases that occurs during cultivation [54].
Regarding the densities in cultivations, there is a concern, for example, in super-
intensive storage in the cultivation of Atlantic salmon, S. salar, regarding the need to feed
the animals and obtain food, with the tons of fish caught destined for fishmeal, the main
source of protein in the food, being an environmental challenge that this industry faces
globally [159]. Under these conditions, alternative sources of protein should be sought, as
described in some works in the previous topics.

7.5. The Golden Pompano

The future perspectives for the expansion of the cultivation of the golden pompano
T. blochii are: the optimization of the cultivation stages and increasing productivity and
production, given the increase in market demand, in addition to discovering new specific
demands and processing, in order to maintain a constant supply of the product, respecting
its short shelf life (very perishable food) [34].

7.6. Conclusions
Thus, this review demonstrates that fish farming is evolving to be more neutral to the
surrounding environment; it is also a hypothesis for being a good food source for humanity,
due to being used aquatic systems and not arable land.
The increase of coastal aquaculture can contribute to the production of much-needed
extra food for the world’s rising population. Increasing fish output, through the growth of
coastal aquaculture, using ecologically friendly techniques and suitable adaption measures
for the physical cultivation methods used nowadays, is important.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 30 of 35

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, G.S.A. and J.C.; preparation, G.S.A., J.W.A.d.S. and J.C.;
writing—review and editing, G.S.A., J.W.A.d.S., J.C. and L.P. All authors have read and agreed to the
published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This work is financed by national funds through the FCT–Foundation for Science and
Technology, I.P., within the scope of the projects UIDB/04292/2020–MARE–Marine and Environ-
mental Sciences Centre and Associate Laboratory ARNET. João Cotas thanks to the European Re-
gional Development Fund, through the Interreg Atlantic Area Program, under the project NASPA
(EAPA_451/2016). This study had the support of national funds, through Fundação para a Ciência e
Tecnologia (FCT), under the project LA/P/0069/2020, granted to the Associate Laboratory ARNET.
We also thank the Live Food Production Laboratory (LABPAV) and the Tropical Aquaculture Study
Group (GEAQUI) of the Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Ceará–IFCE,
Campus Aracati, Ceará, Brazil.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture—Opportunities and Challenges; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014; ISBN 9789251082751.
2. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture—Towards Blue Transformation; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations: Rome, Italy, 2022.
3. Hepher, B.; Prugninin, Y. Cultivo de Peces Comerciales; Editorial Limusa: Mexico City, Mexico, 1985.
4. Junior, O.T.; Casaca, J.M.; Smaniotto, M. Construção de Viveiros para Piscicultura; Boletim Técnico No 124; Empresa de Pesquisa
Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina S.A—EPAGRI: Florianópilis, Brazil, 2004.
5. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 Sustainability in Action; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020.
6. FAO. World Fisheries and Aquaculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2002; ISBN
9789251326923.
7. Lee, C.-S. General Discussion on “Aquaculture Growout Systems—Challenges and Technological Solutions”. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2002,
10, 593–600. [CrossRef]
8. Forster, J. Farming Salmon: An Example of Aquaculture for the Mass Market. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2002, 10, 577–591. [CrossRef]
9. Castagnolli, N. Aquicultura para o Ano 2000; CNPq: Brasilia, Brazil, 1996.
10. Losordo, T.M.; Westerman, P.W. An Analysis of Biological, Economic, and Engineering Factors Affecting the Cost of Fish
Production in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems. J. World Aquac. Soc. 1994, 25, 193–203. [CrossRef]
11. Singh, S.; Marsh, L.S. Modelling thermal environment of a recirculating aquaculture facility. Aquaculture 1996, 139, 11–18.
[CrossRef]
12. van Rijn, J. The potential for integrated biological treatment systems in recirculating fish culture—A review. Aquaculture 1996,
139, 181–201. [CrossRef]
13. Malone, R.F.; Beecher, L.E. Use of floating bead filters to recondition recirculating waters in warmwater aquaculture production
systems. Aquac. Eng. 2000, 22, 57–73. [CrossRef]
14. Davis, D.A.; Arnold, C. The design, management and production of a recirculating raceway system for the production of marine
shrimp. Aquac. Eng. 1998, 17, 193–211. [CrossRef]
15. Blancheton, J.P. Developments in recirculation systems for Mediterranean fish species. Aquac. Eng. 2000, 22, 17–31. [CrossRef]
16. Lovell, R.T. Nutrition of aquaculture species. J. Anim. Sci. 1991, 69, 4193–4200. [CrossRef]
17. Ono, E.A.; Kubitza, F. Cultivo de Peixes em Tanques-Rede; F. Kubitza: Jundiaí, Brazil, 1999.
18. Martinez-Cordova, L.R.; Porchas-Cornejo, M.A.; Villarreal-Colemnares, H.; Calderon-Perez, J.A.; Naranjo-Paramo, J. Evaluation
of three feeding strategies on the culture of white shrimp Penaeus vannamei boone 1931 in low water exchange ponds. Aquac. Eng.
1998, 17, 21–28. [CrossRef]
19. Araujo, G.S.; Maciel, R.L.; Moreira, T.d.S.; Saboya, J.P.d.S.; Moreira, R.T.; da Silva, J.W.A. Performance of the nile tilapia with
varying daily feeding amounts, using a commercial diet. Biosci. J. 2020, 36, 527–538. [CrossRef]
20. Xue, S.; Ding, J.; Li, J.; Jiang, Z.; Fang, J.; Zhao, F.; Mao, Y. Effects of live, artificial and mixed feeds on the growth and energy
budget of Penaeus vannamei. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 19, 100634. [CrossRef]
21. Li, E.; Wang, X.; Chen, K.; Xu, C.; Qin, J.G.; Chen, L. Physiological change and nutritional requirement of Pacific white shrimp
Litopenaeus vannamei at low salinity. Rev. Aquac. 2017, 9, 57–75. [CrossRef]
22. Silva, J.W.A.; Santos, M.J.B.; Bezerra, J.H.C.; Damasceno, V.L.; Araujo, G.S.; Santos, E.S.; Moreira, R.T.; Lopes, D.N.M. Avaliação da
toxicidade da amônia em um policultivo do Litopenaeus vannamei e Spirulina platensis. Braz. J. Dev. 2020, 6, 5615–5623. [CrossRef]
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 31 of 35

23. FAO. World Fisheries and Aquaculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018.
24. Melianawati, R.; Pratiwi, R.; Puniawati, N.; Astuti, P. The role of zooplankton as live feeds on the thyroid hormone profile
related to metamorphosis of marine fish larvae coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Lacepède, 1802). Aquac. Fish. 2022, 7, 179–184.
[CrossRef]
25. Silva, J.W.A.; Santos, M.J.B.; Bezerra, J.H.C.; Damasceno, V.L.; Araujo, G.S.; Santos, E.S.; Moreira, R.T.; Lopes, D.N.M. Influência da
microalga Chlorella vulgaris no desempenho zootécnico do camarão marinho Litopenaeus vannamei. Braz. J. Dev. 2020, 6, 5603–5614.
[CrossRef]
26. Muller-Feuga, A. Microalgae for Aquaculture: The Current Global Situation and Future Trends. In Handbook of Microalgal Culture;
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 613–627.
27. da Silva, A.E.M.; Brito, L.O.; da Silva, D.A.; de Lima, P.C.M.; da Silva Farias, R.; Gálvez, A.O.; da Silva, S.M.B.C. Effect of
Brachionus plicatilis and Navicula sp. on Pacific white shrimp growth performance, Vibrio, immunological responses and resistance
to white spot virus (WSSV) in nursery biofloc system. Aquaculture 2021, 535, 736335. [CrossRef]
28. Jepsen, P.M.; van Someren Gréve, H.; Jørgensen, K.N.; Kjær, K.G.W.; Hansen, B.W. Evaluation of high-density tank cultivation of
the live-feed cyclopoid copepod Apocyclops royi (Lindberg 1940). Aquaculture 2021, 533, 736125. [CrossRef]
29. Chen, Y.; Romeis, J.; Meissle, M. Addressing the challenges of non-target feeding studies with genetically engineered plant
material—Stacked Bt maize and Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 225, 112721. [CrossRef]
30. Vinh, N.P.; Huang, C.T.; Hieu, T.K.; Hsiao, Y.J. Economic evaluation for improving productivity of brine shrimp Artemia franciscana
culture in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735425. [CrossRef]
31. Lim, L.C.; Dhert, P.; Sorgeloos, P. Recent developments in the application of live feeds in the freshwater ornamental fish culture.
Aquaculture 2003, 227, 319–331. [CrossRef]
32. Zhang, H.; Sun, Z.; Liu, B.; Xuan, Y.; Jiang, M.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, Y.; Lu, X.; Yu, D.; et al. Dynamic changes of microbial
communities in Litopenaeus vannamei cultures and the effects of environmental factors. Aquaculture 2016, 455, 97–108. [CrossRef]
33. Vadstein, O.; Attramadal, K.J.K.; Bakke, I.; Olsen, Y. K-Selection as Microbial Community Management Strategy: A Method for
Improved Viability of Larvae in Aquaculture. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2730. [CrossRef]
34. McMaster, M.F.; Gopakumar, G. Trachinotus blochii. In Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016.
35. China Fisheries Association. China Golden Pompano Industry Development Report; China Fisheries Association: Beijing, China, 2020.
36. Tveterås, R.; Jory, D.E.; Nystoyl, R. Goal 2019: Global Finfish Production Review and Forecast; Global Seafood Alliance: Portsmouth,
NH, USA, 2019.
37. Liao, I.C.; Huang, T.-S.; Tsai, W.-S.; Hsueh, C.-M.; Chang, S.-L.; Leaño, E.M. Cobia culture in Taiwan: Current status and problems.
Aquaculture 2004, 237, 155–165. [CrossRef]
38. Venkatachalam, S.; Kandasamy, K.; Krishnamoorthy, I.; Narayanasamy, R. Survival and growth of fish (Lates calcarifer) under
integrated mangrove-aquaculture and open-aquaculture systems. Aquac. Rep. 2018, 9, 18–24. [CrossRef]
39. Sorphea, S.; Terai, A.; Sreyrum, P.; Lundh, T.; Barnes, A.C.; Da, C.T.; Kiessling, A. Growth performance of fry and fingerling Asian
Seabass (Lates calcarifer) from Cambodian brood stock reared at different salinities. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2019, 31, 1–8.
40. Riede, K. Global Register of Migratory Species—From Global to Regional Scales; Final Report of the R&D-Projekt 808 05 08; Federal
Agency for Nature Conservation: Bonn, Germany, 2004.
41. Bigelow, H.B. Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part 1: Lancelets, Cyclostomes, Sharks; Sears Foundation for Marine Research; The
Yale Peabody Museum: New Haven, CT, USA, 1963; Volume 1.
42. Froese, R.; Pauly, D. Fishbase. Available online: www.fishbase.org (accessed on 2 July 2022).
43. FAO. Global Aquaculture Production 1950–2013; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015.
44. Carvalho, M. Larvicultura de Bijupirá. Available online: https://panoramadaaquicultura.com.br/larvicultura-de-bijupira/
(accessed on 2 August 2022).
45. Chang, D. O Cultivo do Bijupirá em Taiwan. Available online: https://panoramadaaquicultura.com.br/o-cultivo-do-bijupira-
em-taiwan/ (accessed on 2 August 2022).
46. Wang, J.; Lan, K.; Wu, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, C.; Lin, H.; Ma, Z. Effect of dietary carbohydrate level on growth, feed utilization,
energy retention, body composition, and digestive and metabolic enzyme activities of juvenile cobia, Rachycentron canadum.
Aquac. Rep. 2022, 25, 101211. [CrossRef]
47. Kubitza, F. Uma Parceria que Resgata a Imagem do Bijupirá. Available online: https://panoramadaaquicultura.com.br/uma-
parceria-que-resgata-a-imagem-do-bijupira/ (accessed on 2 August 2022).
48. Lavens, P.; Sorgeloos, P. Manual on the Production and Use of Live Food for Aquaculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1996.
49. King, N.; Schwarz, M.H.; Morry, D.; Zimmerman, J. Intenive Work on Cobia larvae. Fish Farming Int. 2004.
50. Kanazawa, A. Effects of docosahexaenoic acid and phospholipids on stress tolerance of fish. Aquaculture 1997, 155, 129–134.
[CrossRef]
51. Caylor, R.E.; Biesiot, P.M.; Franks, J.S. Culture of cobia (Rachycentron canadum): Cryopreservation of sperm and induced spawning.
Aquaculture 1994, 125, 81–92. [CrossRef]
52. Brown-Peterson, N.J.; Overstreet, R.M.; Lotz, J.M.; Franks, J.S.; Burns, K.M. Reproductive biology of cobia, Rachycentron canadum,
from coastal waters of the southern United States. Fish. Bull. 2001, 99, 15–28.
53. Zhang, J.; Amenyogbe, E.; Yang, E.; Wang, Z.; Chen, G.; Huang, J. Feeding habits and growth characteristics of cobia (Rachycentron
canadum) larval and juvenile stages. Aquaculture 2021, 539, 736612. [CrossRef]
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 32 of 35

54. FAO. FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies.2008 (accessed on 1 August 2022).
55. Thu Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, H.T.; Vu-Khac, H.; Wang, P.-C.; Chen, S.-C. Identification of protective protein antigens for vaccination
against Streptococcus dysgalactiae in cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 80, 88–96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Yusoff, A. Status of resource management and aquaculture in Malaysia. In Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture
Practices in Southeast Asia: Challenges in Responsible Production of Aquatic Species: Proceedings of the International. Workshop on
Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA); Romana-Eguia, M.R.R., Parado-Estepa,
F.D., Salayo, N.D., Lebata-Ramos, M.J.H., Eds.; Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center: Iloilo,
Philippines, 2015; pp. 53–65.
57. GAA—Global Aquaculture Alliance. Global Fish Production Data and Analysis—Global Fish Production Estimates and Trends; GAA:
Portsmouth, NH, USA, 2016.
58. FAO. Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. Lates calcarifer (Block, 1790); FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019.
59. Alvarez-Lajonchère, L. Cultivo de Robalos: Potencialidades e Resultados. Available online: https://panoramadaaquicultura.com.
br/cultivo-de-robalos-potencialidades-e-resultados/ (accessed on 2 August 2022).
60. Mozanzadeh, M.T.; Safari, O.; Oosooli, R.; Mehrjooyan, S.; Najafabadi, M.Z.; Hoseini, S.J.; Saghavi, H.; Monem, J. The effect of
salinity on growth performance, digestive and antioxidant enzymes, humoral immunity and stress indices in two euryhaline fish
species: Yellowfin seabream (Acanthopagrus latus) and Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). Aquaculture 2021, 534, 736329. [CrossRef]
61. Domingos, J.A.; Goldsbury, J.A.; Bastos Gomes, G.; Smith, B.G.; Tomlinson, C.; Bade, T.; Sander, C.; Forrester, J.; Jerry, D.R.
Genotype by environment interactions of harvest growth traits for barramundi (Lates calcarifer) commercially farmed in marine
vs. freshwater conditions. Aquaculture 2021, 532, 735989. [CrossRef]
62. Nhan, D.T.; Tu, N.P.C.; Tu, N. Van Comparison of growth performance, survival rate and economic efficiency of Asian seabass
(Lates calcarifer) intensively cultured in earthen ponds with high densities. Aquaculture 2022, 554, 738151. [CrossRef]
63. Rimmer, M.A. Barramundi Farming—An Introduction; Queensland Department of Primary Industries Information Series: Queens-
land, Australia, 1995.
64. Mohd Nor, N.; Mohd Yazid, S.H.; Mohd Daud, H.; Azmai, M.N.A.; Mohamad, N. Costs of management practices of Asian seabass
(Lates calcarifer Bloch, 1790) cage culture in Malaysia using stochastic model that includes uncertainty in mortality. Aquaculture
2019, 510, 347–352. [CrossRef]
65. Hassan, H.U.; Ali, Q.M.; Khan, W.; Masood, Z.; Abdel-Aziz, M.F.A.; Shah, M.I.A.; Gabol, K.; Wattoo, J.; Mahmood Chatta, A.;
Kamal, M.; et al. Effect of feeding frequency as a rearing system on biological performance, survival, body chemical composition
and economic efficiency of Asian seabass Lates calcarifer (Bloch, 1790) reared under controlled environmental conditions. Saudi J.
Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 7360–7366. [CrossRef]
66. Chaklader, M.R.; Howieson, J.; Foysal, M.J.; Fotedar, R. Transformation of fish waste protein to Hermetia illucens protein improves
the efficacy of poultry by-products in the culture of juvenile barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 796, 149045.
[CrossRef]
67. Macbeth, M.; O’Brien, L.; Palmer, P.; Lewer, R.; Garrett, R.; Wingfield, M.; Knibb, W. Selective Breeding in Barramundi: Technical
Report for the Australian Barramundi Farmers Association; Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries: Orange, Australia, 2002.
68. Fraser, M.R.; Anderson, T.A.; de Nys, R. Ontogenic development of the spine and spinal deformities in larval barramundi (Lates
calcarifer) culture. Aquaculture 2004, 242, 697–711. [CrossRef]
69. Jitrakorn, S.; Gangnonngiw, W.; Bunnontae, M.; Manajit, O.; Rattanarojpong, T.; Chaivisuthangkura, P.; Dong, H.T.; Saksmerprome,
V. Infectious cell culture system for concurrent propagation and purification of Megalocytivirus ISKNV and nervous necrosis
virus from Asian Sea bass (Lates calcarifer). Aquaculture 2020, 520, 734931. [CrossRef]
70. Yu, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Huang, X.; Huang, Z.; Li, T.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, C.; Ma, Z.; Lin, H. Effects of dietary Astragalus
polysaccharides on growth, health and resistance to Vibrio harveyi of Lates calcarifer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 207, 850–858.
[CrossRef]
71. Siddik, M.A.B.; Howieson, J.; Islam, S.M.M.; Fotedar, R. Synbiotic feed supplementation improves antioxidant response and
innate immunity of juvenile barramundi, Lates calcarifer subjected to bacterial infection. Aquaculture 2022, 552, 737965. [CrossRef]
72. Shao, K.T.; Lim, P.L. Fishes of freshwater and estuary. In Encyclopedia of Field Guide in Taiwan; Recreation Press, Co., Ltd.: Taipei,
China, 1991; p. 240.
73. Jeyaseelan, M.J.P. Manual of Fish Eggs and Larvae from Asian Mangrove Waters; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization: Paris, France, 1998.
74. Kuo, C.M.; Hsieh, S.L. Comparisons of physiological and biochemical responses between milkfish (Chanos chanos) and grass carp
(Ctenopharyngodon idella) to cold shock. Aquaculture 2006, 251, 525–536. [CrossRef]
75. Seegers, L.; De Vos, L.; Okeyo, D.O. Annotated Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Kenya (excluding the lacustrine hap-
lochromines from Lake Victoria). J. East Afr. Nat. Hist. 2003, 92, 11–47. [CrossRef]
76. Allen, G.R.; Midgley, S.H.; Allen, M. Field guide to the freshwater fishes of Australia; Western Australian Museum: Perth, Australia, 2002.
77. Bagarinao, T. Order Gonorynchiformes: Chanidae: Milkfish. In FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes—The Living
Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific: Volume 3: Batoid Fishes, Chimaeras and Bony Fishes Part 1; Carpenter, K.E., Niem, V.H.,
Eds.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1999; pp. 1822–1824.
78. Philippine Council for Agriculture, A. and N.R.R. and D. of the D. of S. and T. The Philippines Recommends for Milkfish; DOST-
PCAARRD: Laguna, Philippines, 2016.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 33 of 35

79. Lee, C.-S.; Leung, P.-S.; Su, M.-S. Bioeconomic evaluation of different fry production systems for milkfish (Chanos chanos).
Aquaculture 1997, 155, 367–376. [CrossRef]
80. de Jesus-Ayson, E.G.T.; Chao, N.H.; Chen, C.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Cheng, C.Y.; Leano, E.M.; Lee, W.C.; Liao, I.C.; Lin, L.T.; Marte, C.L.; et al.
Milkfish Aquaculture in Asia; Asian Fisheries Society and World Aquaculture Society: Keelung, Taiwan, 2010.
81. FAO. FAO Yearbook. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017.
82. Jana, S.N.; Garg, S.K.; Patra, B.C. Effect of inland water salinity on growth performance and nutritional physiology in growing
milkfish, Chanos chanos (Forsskal): Field and laboratory studies. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2006, 22, 25–34. [CrossRef]
83. Hussain, M.; Hassan, H.U.; Siddique, M.A.M.; Mahmood, K.; Abdel-Aziz, M.F.A.; Laghari, M.Y.; Abro, N.A.; Gabol, K.; Nisar;
Rizwan, S.; et al. Effect of varying dietary protein levels on growth performance and survival of milkfish Chanos chanos fingerlings
reared in brackish water pond ecosystem. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2021, 47, 329–334. [CrossRef]
84. Sandeep, K.P.; De, D.; Kumar, S.; Ananda Raja, R.; Mahalakshmi, P.; Suvana, S.; Sivaramakrishnan, T.; Ambasankar, K.; Vijayan,
K.K. Effect of fish waste hydrolysate on growth performance and health status of milk fish (Chanos chanos) and its potential to
reduce feed. Aquaculture 2022, 550, 737834. [CrossRef]
85. Estante-Superio, E.G.; Pakingking, R.V.; Corre, V.L.; Cruz-Lacierda, E.R. Vibrio harveyi-like bacteria associated with fin rot in
farmed milkfish Chanos chanos (Forsskal) fingerlings in the Philippines. Aquaculture 2021, 534, 736259. [CrossRef]
86. Hanke, I.; Hassenrück, C.; Ampe, B.; Kunzmann, A.; Gärdes, A.; Aerts, J. Chronic stress under commercial aquaculture conditions:
Scale cortisol to identify and quantify potential stressors in milkfish (Chanos chanos) mariculture. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735352.
[CrossRef]
87. Scott, W.B.; Crossman, E.J. Freshwater Fishes of Canada; Fisheries Research Board of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1973.
88. Jones, M. Salmo salar. In Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012.
89. Norwegian Seafood Council. Available online: www.seafood.no (accessed on 8 July 2022).
90. SUBPESCA—Subsecretaria de Pesca y Acuicultura Informe Sectorial de Pesca y Acuicultura Consolidado 2020. Available online:
www.subpesca.cl (accessed on 2 August 2022).
91. Olaussen, J.O. Environmental problems and regulation in the aquaculture industry. Insights from Norway. Mar. Policy 2018, 98,
158–163. [CrossRef]
92. Garlock, T.; Asche, F.; Anderson, J.; Bjørndal, T.; Kumar, G.; Lorenzen, K.; Ropicki, A.; Smith, M.D.; Tveterås, R. A Global Blue
Revolution: Aquaculture Growth Across Regions, Species, and Countries. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2020, 28, 107–116. [CrossRef]
93. Wei, M.; Parrish, C.C.; Guerra, N.I.; Tibbetts, S.M.; Colombo, S.M. Dietary inclusion of a marine microalgae meal for Atlantic
salmon (Salmo salar): Impact of Pavlova sp. 459 on growth performance and tissue lipid composition. Aquaculture 2022,
553, 738084. [CrossRef]
94. Hersoug, B.; Mikkelsen, E.; Karlsen, K.M. “Great expectations”—Allocating licenses with special requirements in Norwegian
salmon farming. Mar. Policy 2019, 100, 152–162. [CrossRef]
95. Statistics Norway Akvakultur. Salg av Slaktefisk, Matfisk, Etter Region, Fiskeslag, år og Statistikkvariabel. Available online:
https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/07326/tableViewLayout1 (accessed on 20 August 2022).
96. Gaasland, I.; Straume, H.-M.; Vårdal, E. Agglomeration and trade performance—Evidence from the Norwegian salmon aquacul-
ture industry. Aquac. Econ. Manag. 2020, 24, 181–193. [CrossRef]
97. Johnsen, J.P. Small-Scale Fisheries Governance in Norway: Hierarchy, Institutions and Markets. In Small-Scale Fisheries in
Europe. Status, Resilience and Governance; Pascual-Fernandez, J., Pita, C., Bavinck, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020;
pp. 439–461.
98. Crouse, C.; Davidson, J.; Good, C. The effects of two water temperature regimes on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) growth
performance and maturation in freshwater recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 2022, 553, 738063. [CrossRef]
99. Hansen, J.Ø.; Lagos, L.; Lei, P.; Reveco-Urzua, F.E.; Morales-Lange, B.; Hansen, L.D.; Schiavone, M.; Mydland, L.T.; Arntzen,
M.Ø.; Mercado, L.; et al. Down-stream processing of baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)—Effect on nutrient digestibility and
immune response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2021, 530, 735707. [CrossRef]
100. Hevrøy, E.; Boxaspen, K.; Oppedal, F.; Taranger, G.; Holm, J. The effect of artificial light treatment and depth on the infestation of
the sea louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) culture. Aquaculture 2003, 220, 1–14. [CrossRef]
101. Sistiaga, M.; Herrmann, B.; Jørgensen, T. Prediction of goldsinny wrasse (Ctenolabrus rupestris) minimum size required to avoid
escape through salmon (Salmo salar) farm nets. Aquaculture 2021, 543, 737024. [CrossRef]
102. Ransangan, J.; Manin, B.O.; Abdullah, A.; Roli, Z.; Sharudin, E.F. Betanodavirus infection in golden pompano, Trachinotus blochii,
fingerlings cultured in deep-sea cage culture facility in Langkawi, Malaysia. Aquaculture 2011, 315, 327–334. [CrossRef]
103. Pakingking, R.; Mori, K.-I.; Bautista, N.B.; de Jesus-Ayson, E.G.; Reyes, O. Susceptibility of hatchery-reared snubnose pompano
Trachinotus blochii to natural betanodavirus infection and their immune responses to the inactivated causative virus. Aquaculture
2011, 311, 80–86. [CrossRef]
104. Song, F.; Ye, H.; Shi, L.; Ouyang, D.; Sun, J.; Luo, J. Characterization and functional analysis of myostatin and myogenin genes
involved in temperature variation and starvation stress in Golden pompano, Trachinotus blochii. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A
Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2022, 267, 111183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
105. Ebeneezar, S.; Vijayagopal, P.; Srivastava, P.P.; Gupta, S.; Sikendrakumar; Varghese, T.; Prabu, D.L.; Chandrasekar, S.; Varghese, E.;
Sayooj, P.; et al. Dietary lysine requirement of juvenile Silver pompano, Trachinotus blochii (Lacepede, 1801). Aquaculture 2019,
511, 734234. [CrossRef]
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 34 of 35

106. Stites, W.; Weldon, A.; Reis, J.; Walsh, S.; Davis, R.; Rhodes, M.; Davis, D.A. Quantitative lysine requirement for juvenile Florida
pompano, Trachinotus carolinus fed plant-based diets. Aquaculture 2022, 547, 737548. [CrossRef]
107. Sun, J.L.; Liu, Y.F.; Jiang, T.; Li, Y.Q.; Song, F.B.; Wen, X.; Luo, J. Golden pompano (Trachinotus blochii) adapts to acute hypoxic
stress by altering the preferred mode of energy metabolism. Aquaculture 2021, 542, 736842. [CrossRef]
108. Suzuki, A. Rising Importance of Aquaculture in Asia: Current Status, Issues, and Recommendations; The University of Tokyo: Tokyo,
Japan, 2021.
109. Moreira, H.L.M.; Vargas, L.; Ribeiro, R.P.; Zimmermann, S. Fundamentos da Moderna Aqüicultura; ULBRA: Canoas, Brazil, 2001.
110. Cruz, E.M.; Ridha, M. Production of the tilapiaOreochromis spilurus Günther stocked at different densities in sea cages. Aquaculture
1991, 99, 95–103. [CrossRef]
111. Suresh, A.V.; Lin, C.K. Tilapia culture in saline waters: A review. Aquaculture 1992, 106, 201–226. [CrossRef]
112. Kubitza, F. Tilápia em água salobra e salgada—Uma boa alternativa de cultivo para estuários e viveiros litorâneos. Panor.
Aqüicultura 2005, 15, 14–18.
113. Kubitza, F. Tilápia: Tecnologia e Planejamento na Produção Comercial; F. Kubitza: Jundiaí, Brazil, 2000.
114. Araujo, G.S.; Silva, J.W.A.; Moreira, T.S.; Maciel, R.L.; Farias, W.R.L. Cultivo da tilápia do nilo em tanques-rede circulares e
quadrangulares em duas densidades de estocagem. Biosci. J. 2011, 27, 805–812.
115. Arous, W.H.; El-bermawi, N.M.; Shaltout, O.E.; Essa, M.A.E. Effect of adding different carotenoid sources on growth performance,
pigmentation, stress response and quality in red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp). Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 2014, 4, 988–999.
116. Deng, W.; Xiao, Y.; Cao, K.; Ma, L. Development, challenge and strategy of channel cafish industry of China. China Fish. 2010, 12,
11–13.
117. Geng, Y.; Liu, D.; Han, S.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, K.Y.; Huang, X.L.; Chen, D.F.; Peng, X.; Lai, W.M. Outbreaks of vibriosis associated
with Vibrio mimicus in freshwater catfish in China. Aquaculture 2014, 433, 82–84. [CrossRef]
118. Yan, C.H.; Xiao, Y.H.; Li, L. Current status of world catfish industry and recognition of market positioning of channel catfish
industry in China. China Fish. 2013, 47, 36–40.
119. Tao, J.J. Summary of the development of the channel catfish industry. Fish. Rich Guid. 2017, 13, 14–17.
120. Zhou, Z.; Dai, Y.-Y.; Yuan, Y.; He, Y.-H.; Zhou, J. Status, Trends, and Prospects of the Channel Catfish Industry in China and the
impact of the COVID-19 epidemic. Isr. J. Aquac.—Bamidgeh 2021, 73. [CrossRef]
121. Xia, R.; Hao, Q.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ran, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Chu, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. Effects of dietary Saccharomyces
cerevisiae on growth, intestinal and liver health, intestinal microbiota and disease resistance of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).
Aquac. Rep. 2022, 24, 101157. [CrossRef]
122. Tran, N.; Rodriguez, U.-P.; Chan, C.Y.; Phillips, M.J.; Mohan, C.V.; Henriksson, P.J.G.; Koeshendrajana, S.; Suri, S.; Hall, S.
Indonesian aquaculture futures: An analysis of fish supply and demand in Indonesia to 2030 and role of aquaculture using the
AsiaFish model. Mar. Policy 2017, 79, 25–32. [CrossRef]
123. Piria, M.; Tomljanović, T.; Treer, T.; Safner, R.; Aničić, I.; Matulić, D.; Vilizzi, L. The common carp Cyprinus carpio in Croatia
(Danube and Adriatic basins): A historical review. Aquac. Int. 2016, 24, 1527–1541.
124. Kühlwein, H.; Merrifield, D.L.; Rawling, M.D.; Foey, A.D.; Davies, S.J. Effects of dietary β-(1,3)(1,6)-D-glucan supplementation
on growth performance, intestinal morphology and haemato-immunological profile of mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). J. Anim.
Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2014, 98, 279–289. [CrossRef]
125. Adámek, Z.; Mössmer, M.; Hauber, M. Current principles and issues affecting organic carp (Cyprinus carpio) pond farming.
Aquaculture 2019, 512, 734261. [CrossRef]
126. Hulata, G. A review of genetic improvement of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and other cyprinids by crossbreeding,
hybridization and selection. Aquaculture 1995, 129, 143–155. [CrossRef]
127. Khan, T.A. Dietary studies on exotic carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) from two lakes of western Victoria, Australia. Aquat. Sci.—Res.
Across Boundaries 2003, 65, 272–286. [CrossRef]
128. Fang, J.; Xu, Y.; Nie, Z.; Xu, G.; Jiang, Z.; Shao, N.; Xiao, Y.; Fang, J. Food sources of common carp in a Hani Terrace integrated
rice-fish system (Yunnan Province, China). Aquac. Rep. 2022, 22, 100937. [CrossRef]
129. Dong, Z.; Zhang, J.; Ji, X.; Zhou, F.; Fu, Y.; Chen, W.; Zeng, Y.; Li, T.; Wang, H. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression
of cathepsin D from grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 33, 1207–1214. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
130. FAO. Fisheries and Aquaculture Topics. In The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016; pp. 3–63.
131. Rao, Y.; Su, J. Insights into the Antiviral Immunity against Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Reovirus (GCRV) in Grass Carp. J.
Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 670437. [CrossRef]
132. Jiang, Q.; Bhattarai, N.; Pahlow, M.; Xu, Z. Environmental sustainability and footprints of global aquaculture. Resour. Conserv.
Recycl. 2022, 180, 106183. [CrossRef]
133. Kumaran, M.; Vasagam, K.P.K.; Kailasam, M.; Subburaj, R.; Anand, P.R.; Ravisankar, T.; Sendhilkumar, R.; Santhanakumar, J.;
Vijayan, K.K. Three-tier cage aquaculture of Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer) fish in the coastal brackishwaters—A techno-economic
appraisal. Aquaculture 2021, 543, 737025. [CrossRef]
134. Calleja, F.; Chacón Guzmán, J.; Alfaro Chavarría, H. Marine aquaculture in the pacific coast of Costa Rica: Identifying the
optimum areas for a sustainable development. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2022, 219, 106033. [CrossRef]
135. Carballeira Braña, C.B.; Cerbule, K.; Senff, P.; Stolz, I.K. Towards Environmental Sustainability in Marine Finfish Aquaculture.
Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 666662. [CrossRef]
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1598 35 of 35

136. Ahmad, A.L.; Chin, J.Y.; Mohd Harun, M.H.Z.; Low, S.C. Environmental impacts and imperative technologies towards sustainable
treatment of aquaculture wastewater: A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 46, 102553. [CrossRef]
137. Yue, K.; Shen, Y. An overview of disruptive technologies for aquaculture. Aquac. Fish. 2022, 7, 111–120. [CrossRef]
138. Aquaculture 4.0: Applying Industry Strategy to Fisheries Management; Innovation News Network: Congleton, UK, 2019.
139. Behroozi, L.; Couturier, M.F. Prediction of water velocities in circular aquaculture tanks using an axisymmetric CFD model.
Aquac. Eng. 2019, 85, 114–128. [CrossRef]
140. Reid, G.K.; Lefebvre, S.; Filgueira, R.; Robinson, S.M.C.; Broch, O.J.; Dumas, A.; Chopin, T.B.R. Performance measures and models
for open-water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 47–75. [CrossRef]
141. Making Fish Farming More Sustainable. Available online: https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2016/04/13/making-fish-
farming-more-sustainable/ (accessed on 21 August 2022).
142. Cottrell, R.S.; Blanchard, J.L.; Halpern, B.S.; Metian, M.; Froehlich, H.E. Global adoption of novel aquaculture feeds could
substantially reduce forage fish demand by 2030. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 301–308. [CrossRef]
143. Craig, S.; Kuhn, D.D. Fish Feed. Va. Coop. Ext. 2017, 420–256, 1–6.
144. Wuertz, S.; Schroeder, A.; Wanka, K.M. Probiotics in Fish Nutrition—Long-Standing Household Remedy or Native Nutraceuticals?
Water 2021, 13, 1348. [CrossRef]
145. Sakthivel, M.; Deivasigamani, B. Immunostimulatory Effects of Polysaccharide Compound from Seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii
on Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) and it’s Resistance against Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Mar. Biol. Oceanogr. 2015, 4, 2.
146. FAO. Biosecurity Toolkit—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Biosecurity Priority Area for Interdisci-
plinary Action—Google Books. Available online: https://books.google.pt/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zqOQuw-q7zIC&oi=fnd&
pg=PR5&dq=fao+biosecurity&ots=XxHrmbbphc&sig=lpGOyM6CED365VihfM2WMcDcGaE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=
faobiosecurity&f=false (accessed on 21 August 2022).
147. Palić, D.; Scarfe, A.D.; Walster, C.I. A Standardized Approach for Meeting National and International Aquaculture Biosecurity
Requirements for Preventing, Controlling, and Eradicating Infectious Diseases. J. Appl. Aquac. 2015, 27, 185–219.
148. Ahmed, N.; Turchini, G.M. The evolution of the blue-green revolution of rice-fish cultivation for sustainable food production.
Sustain. Sci. 2021, 16, 1375–1390. [CrossRef]
149. Edwards, P. Aquaculture environment interactions: Past, present and likely future trends. Aquaculture 2015, 447, 2–14. [CrossRef]
150. Beveridge, M.C.M.; Thilsted, S.H.; Phillips, M.J.; Metian, M.; Troell, M.; Hall, S.J. Meeting the food and nutrition needs of the poor:
The role of fish and the opportunities and challenges emerging from the rise of aquaculture a. J. Fish Biol. 2013, 83, 1067–1084.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
151. Waite, R.; Beveridge, M.; Brummett, R.; Castine, S.; Chaiyawannakarn, N.; Kaushik, S.; Mungkung, R.; Nawapakpilai, S.; Phillips,
M. Improving Productivity and Environmental Performance of Aquaculture; WorldFish: Penang, Malaysia, 2014.
152. Leandro, M.G. Biosecurity and Risk of Disease Introduction and Spread in Mediterranean Seabass and Seabream Farms. Doctoral
Thesis, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, 2021.
153. Colihueque, N.; Araneda, C. Appearance traits in fish farming: Progress from classical genetics to genomics, providing insight
into current and potential genetic improvement. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 251. [CrossRef]
154. Pulcini, D.; Wheeler, P.A.; Cataudella, S.; Russo, T.; Thorgaard, G.H. Domestication shapes morphology in rainbow trout
Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Fish Biol. 2013, 82, 390–407. [CrossRef]
155. Houston, R.D.; Bean, T.P.; Macqueen, D.J.; Gundappa, M.K.; Jin, Y.H.; Jenkins, T.L.; Selly, S.L.C.; Martin, S.A.M.; Stevens, J.R.;
Santos, E.M.; et al. Harnessing genomics to fast-track genetic improvement in aquaculture. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 21, 389–409.
[CrossRef]
156. Abdelrahman, H.; ElHady, M.; Alcivar-Warren, A.; Allen, S.; Al-Tobasei, R.; Bao, L.; Beck, B.; Blackburn, H.; Bosworth, B.;
Buchanan, J.; et al. Aquaculture genomics, genetics and breeding in the United States: Current status, challenges, and priorities
for future research. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 191.
157. Lien, S.; Koop, B.F.; Sandve, S.R.; Miller, J.R.; Kent, M.P.; Nome, T.; Hvidsten, T.R.; Leong, J.S.; Minkley, D.R.; Zimin, A.; et al. The
Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 2016, 533, 200–205. [CrossRef]
158. Mahamud, A.G.M.S.U.; Anu, M.S.; Baroi, A.; Datta, A.; Khan, M.S.U.; Rahman, M.; Tabassum, T.; Tanwi, J.T.; Rahman, T.
Microplastics in fishmeal: A threatening issue for sustainable aquaculture and human health. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 25, 101205.
[CrossRef]
159. Martin, S.J.; Mather, C.; Knott, C.; Bavington, D. ‘Landing’ salmon aquaculture: Ecologies, infrastructures and the promise of
sustainability. Geoforum 2021, 123, 47–55. [CrossRef]